CBPS Appoved Plan Withmap

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

CBPS Appoved Plan Withmap Cockroach Bay Preserve State Park APPROVED Unit Management Plan STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Division of Recreation and Parks July 9 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................1 PURPOSE AND SIGNIFICANCE OF THE PARK ....................................... 1 Park Significance ................................................................................1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF THE PLAN..................................................... 2 MANAGEMENT PROGRAM OVERVIEW ................................................... 7 Management Authority and Responsibility .............................................. 7 Park Management Goals ...................................................................... 8 Management Coordination ................................................................... 8 Public Participation ..............................................................................9 Other Designations .............................................................................9 RESOURCE MANAGEMENT COMPONENT INTRODUCTION ................................................................................. 11 RESOURCE DESCRIPTION AND ASSESSMENT..................................... 12 Natural Resources ............................................................................. 12 Topography .................................................................................. 12 Geology ....................................................................................... 15 Soils ............................................................................................ 16 Minerals ....................................................................................... 16 Hydrology .................................................................................... 19 Natural Communities (FNAI) ........................................................... 20 Imperiled Species ......................................................................... 32 Exotic and Nuisance Species ........................................................... 35 Cultural Resources ............................................................................ 38 Condition Assessment .................................................................... 38 Level of Significance ...................................................................... 38 Prehistoric and Historic Archaeological Sites ..................................... 39 Historic Structures ........................................................................ 41 Collections ................................................................................... 41 RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM ................................................. 42 Management Goals, Objectives and Actions .......................................... 42 Natural Resource Management ........................................................... 43 Hydrological Management .............................................................. 43 Natural Communities Management .................................................. 43 Imperiled Species Management ...................................................... 46 Exotic Species Management ........................................................... 47 Cultural Resource Management .......................................................... 48 Special Management Considerations .................................................... 50 Timber Management Analysis ......................................................... 50 Coastal/Beach Management ........................................................... 50 Arthropod Control Plan ................................................................... 50 Sea Level Rise .............................................................................. 51 i Resource Management Schedule ......................................................... 51 Land Management Review ................................................................. 51 LAND USE COMPONENT INTRODUCTION ................................................................................. 53 EXTERNAL CONDITIONS .................................................................... 53 Existing Use of Adjacent Lands ........................................................... 54 Planned Use of Adjacent Lands ........................................................... 54 PROPERTY ANALYSIS ..................................................................... 57 Recreation Resource Elements ............................................................ 57 Land Area .................................................................................... 57 Water Area ................................................................................... 57 Natural Scenery ............................................................................ 58 Significant Habitat ......................................................................... 58 Natural Features ........................................................................... 58 Archaeological and Historical Features ............................................. 58 Assessment of Use ............................................................................ 59 Past Uses ..................................................................................... 59 Future Land Use and Zoning ........................................................... 59 Current Recreation Use and Visitor Programs .................................... 60 Protected Zones ............................................................................ 60 Existing Facilities ........................................................................... 60 Recreation Facilities ....................................................................... 60 Support Facilities .......................................................................... 61 CONCEPTUAL LAND USE PLAN ........................................................... 61 Potential Uses .................................................................................. 61 Public Access and Recreational Opportunities .................................... 61 Proposed Facilities ............................................................................ 62 Capital Facilities and Infrastructure ................................................. 62 Facilities Development ....................................................................... 65 Recreational Carrying Capacity ........................................................... 65 Optimum Boundary ........................................................................... 66 IMPLEMENTATION COMPONENT MANAGEMENT PROGRESS .................................................................. 69 Acquisition ....................................................................................... 69 Park Administration and Operations .................................................... 69 Resource Management ...................................................................... 69 Natural Resources ......................................................................... 69 Cultural Resources ........................................................................ 69 Park Facilities ................................................................................... 70 MANAGEMENT PLAN IMPLEMENTATION ............................................ 70 ii TABLES TABLE 1 – Cockroach Bay Preserve State Park Management Zones ............ 12 TABLE 2 – Imperiled Species Inventory .................................................. 34 TABLE 3 – Inventory of FLEPPC Category I and II Exotic Plant Species ....... 37 TABLE 4 – Cultural Sites Listed in the Florida Master Site File ................... 42 TABLE 5 – Recreational Carrying Capacity .............................................. 65 TABLE 6 – Implementation Schedule and Cost Estimates.......................... 71 MAPS Vicinity Map ...........................................................................................3 Reference Map .......................................................................................5 Management Zones Map........................................................................ 13 Soils Map ............................................................................................ 17 Natural Communities Map ...................................................................... 23 Base Map ............................................................................................ 55 Conceptual Land Use Plan ...................................................................... 63 Optimum Boundary Map ........................................................................ 67 LIST OF ADDENDA ADDENDUM 1 Acquisition History ....................................................................... A 1 - 1 ADDENDUM 2 Advisory Group Members and Report ............................................. A 2 - 1 ADDENDUM 3 References Cited ......................................................................... A 3 - 1 ADDENDUM 4 Soil Descriptions ......................................................................... A 4 - 1 ADDENDUM 5 Plant and Animal List ................................................................... A 5 - 1 ADDENDUM 6 Imperiled Species Ranking............................................................ A 6 - 1 ADDENDUM 7 Cultural Information ...................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Mexican Bromeliad Weevil (Suggested Common Name), Metamasius Callizona (Chevrolat) (Insecta: Coleoptera: Curculionidae)1 Barba Larson and J
    EENY161 Mexican Bromeliad Weevil (suggested common name), Metamasius callizona (Chevrolat) (Insecta: Coleoptera: Curculionidae)1 Barba Larson and J. Howard Frank2 Barber, the smallest of the three and native to Florida, Cuba, and the Dominican Republic, has been collected in Florida infrequently. Unlike Metamasius callizona, its presence does not threaten populations of native bromeli- ads in Florida’s natural areas. The third species, Metamasius hempipterus sericeus (Olivier), was first reported in Florida in Miami-Dade County in 1984 and has since become an important pest of sugarcane, bananas, and ornamental palms. Figure 1. Tillandsia utriculata (L.), a bromeliad species endangered in Florida due to attack by Metamasius callizona (Chevrolat), in the Fakahatchee Strand State Preserve, Collier County, 1993. Credits: H. Nadel, University of Florida Introduction and History Metamasius callizona (Chevrolat) has no accepted common name, but it has been referred to as the “Evil Weevil” by bromeliad enthusiasts throughout Florida, as a result of the destruction it has caused to native populations of bromeli- ads in the southern portion of the state. A member of the Figure 2. Guzmania monostachia (L.), one of Florida’s rare and weevil family Curculionidae, it is one of three species of the endangered species of bromeliads, in the Fakahatchee Strand State genus Metamasius present in Florida. Metamasius mosieri Preserve, Collier County, 1999. Credits: J.H. Frank, University of Florida 1. This document is EENY161, one of a series of the Entomology and Nematology Department, UF/IFAS Extension. Original publication date October 2000. Revised October 2000, April 2009, February 2016, April 2016, and February 2019. Visit the EDIS website at https://edis.ifas.ufl.edu.
    [Show full text]
  • Modeling the Conservation Impact of Differential Life History Strategies In
    Modeling the Conservation Impact of Differential Life History Strategies in Tillandsia utric- ulata & Tillandsia fasciculata { A Preliminary Report · Erin N. Bodines Tillandsia utriculata and T. fasciculata are both large, long-lived epiphytes of the Bromeliaceae plant family. All bromeliads are composed of a rosette of strappy leaves produced by a bud, the apical meristem. In most taxa, the apical meristem eventually converts to building an inflorescence for attempted sexual reproduction via flowers, with no further growth from that bud after the seeds are dispersed. Iteroparous taxa can asexually reproduced via clonal pup rosettes (\pups") produced by axillary meristem buds found above each leaf. In stark contrast, semelparous bromeliads lack the ability to produce pups from axillary meristems. In Florida, T. utriculata is semelparous and T. fasciculata is iteroparous. These and other Florida native bromeliads are imperiled by the invasive Mexian weevil Metamasius callizona, whose larva will consume all of the apical meristematic tissue of large bromeliads, leaving no means of sexual reproduction (the only means of reproduction for T. utriculata). We construct an agent-based model to simulate the growth, reproduction, and seed dispersal of populations of T. utriculata and T. fasciculata in Myakka River State Park in Florida. This model will be used to predict future T. utriculata and T. fasciculata population demographics and spatial distribution in the wake of a M. callizona infestation. Additionally, this model will provide the basis for assessing the differential impact of proposed and previously implemented M. callizona control and irradication measures on the populations of T. utriculata and T. fasciculata. 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Metamasius Callizona, a Villain in Florida
    Welcome! On Adobe Connect you can use VOIP or: 1. Call into the meeting 1-866-385-9623 (US) (Call-in toll-free number) 1-443-863-6602 (US) (Call-in number) 2. Enter the access code: 751 091 0623 (Conference code) 3. Please Mute your line if you are not actively speaking 4. A headset is recommended if you use VOIP CISMA Call Agenda 1:30pm Introductions . Sherry Williams 1:35pm Technical Presentation . Mexican Bromeliad Weevil– Howard Frank 1:55pm CISMA Update . Florida CISMAs – Apalachicola RSA – Brian Pelc 2:10pm Shoutouts . 10th FLEPPC CISMA Session, NISAW 2017, 4th Fall HalloWeed Count, . Polls 2:30pm Adjourn Introducing the New FISP Co-Chairs • Sherry Williams – Seminole County Natural Resources Program Coordinator for the Seminole County Greenways and Natural Lands Division – [email protected] • Samantha Yuan – FWC, Invasive Plant Management Section (IPMS) Research and Outreach Manager – [email protected] This Month’s Call 8th Call on the new Adobe Connect platform • Same conference Number as before • Same conference code • New link Technical Presentation Mexican Bromeliad Weevil Presented by Howard Frank Metamasius callizona, a villain in Florida Howard Frank, Entomology & Nematology Department, IFAS, UF campus Retired in 2012, now Professor Emeritus Trained in insect ecology. Worked 1972- 1985 on mosquitoes, mainly in bromeliads, but also Aedes aegypti. Tillandsia utriculata grows slowly – a plant with longest leaf of 1 m and volumetric capacity of 1 liter may be 12 years old – and is monocarpic Tillandsia fasciculata has narrower leaves (so smaller axils), and perhaps more of them, than does T. utriculata, and reproduces vegetatively too Metamasius callizona also attacks 11 other native Florida bromeliads here with Tillandsia fasciculata, also endangered 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Metamasius Callizona Is Destroying Florida's Native Bromeliads
    _________________________________________ Metamasius callizona and Florida’s Native Bromeliads METAMASIUS CALLIZONA IS DESTROYING FLORIDA’S NATIVE BROMELIADS Howard FRANK1 and Ronald CAVE2 1Entomology and Nematology Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-0630, U.S.A. [email protected] 2Indian River Research and Education Center, University of Florida, Ft. Pierce, FL 34945, U.S.A. [email protected] ABSTRACT Bromeliads (Bromeliaceae) are a family of about 2,500 species native to the Neotropics, with 16 native to Florida. For decades, enthusiasts have imported into Florida numerous species from Neotropical countries for their attractive foliage and colorful flowers. The impression of enthusiasts, still fostered by growers’ manuals, was that bromeliads have no serious pest insects – only a few easily controllable scale insects and mealybugs (Coccoidea). In 1989, an unidentified weevil was detected on ornamental bromeliads at a nursery in Ft. Lauderdale. 91 The nursery was treated with chemicals to eradicate the population, but too late – surveys showed that this weevil was established on native Florida bromeliads in nearby county parks. It was Metamasius callizona (Chevrolat) (Coleoptera: Dryophthoridae, formerly Curculionidae). It had been shipped from infested shadehouses in the state of Veracruz, Mexico. USDA-APHIS records showed interceptions year after year of this and other Metamasius weevils on bromeliads imported to Florida. There was little knowledge of it in Mexico except as an occasional pest of cultivated pineapples, which was unpublished information at the time. A chemical eradication attempt was not supportable because (1) the weevil was already in county parks that may not be treated with chemicals, and (2) there were no funds except for eradication of major agricultural pests.
    [Show full text]
  • Prsrt Std U.S. Postage PAID Gainesville, FL Permit No
    Prsrt std U.S. Postage PAID Gainesville, FL Permit No. 726 SPRING 2005 SPRING SPRING 2005 SPRING Wildland Weeds Wildland Wildland Weeds Wildland FLORIDA EXOTIC PEST PLANT COUNCIL – www.fleppc.org Officers Editorial Brazilian Pepper Karen Brown Jim Cuda Jim Burney, Chair University of Florida Aquatic Vegetation Control, Inc. Education Entomology Department 561/845-5525 Leesa Souto 352/392-1901 Ext. 126 Wildland Weeds WildlandPRING WeedsOLUME UMBER [email protected] Stormwater Management S 2005, V 8, N 2 [email protected] Academy Dianne Owen, Secretary 321/722-2123 Carrotwood Florida Atlantic University [email protected] Chris Lockhart Table of Contents 954-236-1085 [email protected] FNGA/FLEPPC Liaison Dioscorea 4 Editor’s Note Doria Gordon Mike Bodle Kristina Kay Serbesoff-King, University of Florida Treasurer Grasses 5 Letter to the Editor The Nature Conservancy The Nature Conservancy Greg MacDonald by Dennis Teague 352/392-5949 561-744-6668 University of Florida [email protected] [email protected] Agronomy Department 6 Snakes, Snails, and Puppy Dog Tails: -and- 352/392-1811 Ext. 228 Lygodium with Teeth, by Amy Ferriter Karen Brown, Editor JB Miller [email protected] University of Florida St. Johns River Water Exotic South American Snail Occurs in Florida Waters Lygodium Center for Aquatic Management District Amy Ferriter/Tom Fucigna Evil Weevils, by Heidi Aspen Rhoades & Invasive Plants [email protected] 352/392-1799 Skunkvine Legislative 11 The Power of Partnerships – Island Style [email protected] Brian Nelson Matthew
    [Show full text]
  • A Demographic Model of an Endangered Florida Native Bromeliad (Tillandsia Utriculata)
    Spora: A Journal of Biomathematics Volume 6 Article 2 2020 A Demographic Model of an Endangered Florida Native Bromeliad (Tillandsia utriculata) Zoe S. Brookover Rhodes College, [email protected] Alexandra M. Campbell Rhodes College, [email protected] Brian D. Christman Rhodes College, [email protected] Sydney L. Davis Rhodes College, [email protected] Erin N. Bodine Rhodes College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.library.illinoisstate.edu/spora Part of the Other Applied Mathematics Commons, and the Population Biology Commons Recommended Citation Brookover, Zoe S.; Campbell, Alexandra M.; Christman, Brian D.; Davis, Sydney L.; and Bodine, Erin N. (2020) "A Demographic Model of an Endangered Florida Native Bromeliad (Tillandsia utriculata)," Spora: A Journal of Biomathematics: Vol. 6, 1–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30707/SPORA6.1/ZUAI3621 Available at: https://ir.library.illinoisstate.edu/spora/vol6/iss1/2 This Mathematics Research is brought to you for free and open access by ISU ReD: Research and eData. It has been accepted for inclusion in Spora: A Journal of Biomathematics by an authorized editor of ISU ReD: Research and eData. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A Demographic Model of an Endangered Florida Native Bromeliad (Tillandsia utriculata) Cover Page Footnote The authors would like to thank Dr. Teresa Cooper for the use of her raw data from [6] which allowed for the parameterization of the model presented in this paper. This mathematics research is available in Spora: A Journal of Biomathematics: https://ir.library.illinoisstate.edu/ spora/vol6/iss1/2 ISSN 2473-3067 (Print) ISSN 2473-5493 (Online) A Demographic Model of an Endangered Florida Native Bromeliad, Tillandsia utriculata Zoe S.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015-RPTF-Abstracts-Update.Pdf
    ABSTRACTS 2015 RARE PLANT TASK FORCE ORAL PRESENTATIONS Jenna Annis, Eastern Illinois University, Department of Biological Sciences, Samantha Primer, University of Illinois, Department of Plant Biology, Janice Coons, Eastern Illinois University, Department of Biological Sciences, Brenda Molano-Flores, Illinois Natural History Survey, Center for Wildlife and Plant Ecology, and Mary Ann Feist, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Department of Botany, “Impact of environmental factors on anthocyanin production and the proposed link with prey capture in Pinguicula planifolia.” [email protected] The occurrence of anthocyanins in the vegetative tissues of evolutionarily distinct carnivorous plant families suggests these pigments may provide physiological adaptations. Pinguicula planifolia (Lentibulariaceae) is one of six carnivorous butterwort species endemic to the Florida Panhandle. The state threatened P. planifolia expresses a prominent variation of anthocyanins on its insect-trapping leaves. Our objectives were to determine how environmental factors impact anthocyanin production in P. planifolia, and to determine how anthocyanin affects prey capture. Three field studies were conducted at populations within the Florida Panhandle. For the first study, chlorophyll and anthocyanin contents in leaves were measured as a factor of light intensity, water depth, soil nutrients, water nutrients, and habitat structure. In the second study, artificial sticky traps (painted red, green, or control) were established next to plants to determine how color affects prey capture. For the third study, three treatments were established for marked plants (control, clipped, and caged), to test if leaf anthocyanin content can change when light intensity changes. Laboratory studies tested ex situ responses of P. planifolia anthocyanin production to artificial environmental cues. Leaf anthocyanin content is linked to changes in light intensity.
    [Show full text]
  • General News
    Biocontrol News and Information 29(1), 1N–18N pestscience.com General News Biological Control of the Mexican Bromeliad Most final instars of the parasitoid exited their host Weevil 13–16 days after initial exposure to the flies. The technology was subsequently refined and expanded The Mexican bromeliad weevil, Metamasius calli- for M. callizona in the quarantine facility at UF’s zona, is destroying native bromeliad populations Hayslip Biological Control Research and Contain- throughout south Florida (USA). Southern Florida ment Laboratory at the Indian River Research and has 16 native species of bromeliads, of which 12 are Education Center. Pineapple crowns obtained from susceptible to attack by the weevil. The female local grocery stores are exposed to M. callizona weevil lays her eggs in the bromeliad leaf and soon females for one week, after which they are removed. after the larva emerges it bores into the plant’s stem. The pineapple crowns are held at 25ºC for three After extensive feeding by the weevil grub, the plant weeks, at which time the weevil larvae inside the dies before producing seeds. The weevil was first crowns should be in the third instar. Twelve infested detected in Florida in 1989, certainly as a result of crowns are placed five days per week in a large para- infested plants being imported from southern sitization cage containing 150–300 adult L. franki of Mexico1. In 1993, a tachinid fly parasitizing the mixed ages; crowns remain in the cage for ten days. related bromeliad-eating weevil Metamasius quadri- Afterwards, the crowns are placed in a smaller cage lineatus was found in the montane forests of to monitor the emergence of any adult flies that were Honduras.
    [Show full text]
  • Network Scan Data
    Selbyana 20(1): 40-48. 1999. BROMELIAD-EATING WEEVILS 1.R. FRANK Entomology and Nematology Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-0630 USA. E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT. All known bromeliad-eating weevils-24 species in four genera (Cactophagus, Cholus, Dias­ tethus, and Metamasius)-are native to the tropics and subtropics of the Americas. Several attack more than one bromeliad genus. Six are known to attack Ananas comosus. Four (Metamasius dimidiatipennis, M. callizona, M. quadrilineatus, and M. sellatus) have traveled far from their native ranges by hitchhiking in exported/imported bromeliads. Metamasius mosieri (a small weevil) attacks bromeliads of small stature, whereas M. callizona (a larger weevil) attacks bromeliads of larger stature. Tillandsia utriculata popUlations in Florida (USA) have suffered devastating attack by the immigrant weevil M. callizona (from Mexico), perhaps because these plants have evolved in isolation and have no method of resistance. A biological control campaign against M. callizona is in progress. RESUMEN. Todos los picudos comedores de bromelias conocidas, los cuales pertenecen a 24 especies en cuatro generos (Metamasius, Cactophagus, Diastethus y Cholus), son nativos de los tr6picos y subtr6picos de las Americas. Varios atacan mas de un genero de bromelias. Seis atacan Ananas comosus. Cuatro (Metamasius dimidiatipennis, M. callizona, M. quadrilineatus y M. sellatus) han viajado lejos de sus am­ bientes nativos como "polizones" en bromelias exportadas e importadas. Metamasius mosieri (un picudo pequeno) ataca bromelias de tamano pequeno, mientras M. callizona (un picudo mas grande) ataca bro­ melias de mayor tamano. Poblaciones de Tillandsia utriculata en la Florida (Estados Unidos) han sufrido ataques devastadores por el picudo inmigrante de Mexico M.
    [Show full text]
  • Katie Schulman Poster 2105
    Examining the efficacy of pesticide use in the laboratory to treat Tillandsia utriculata against the exotic invasive arthropod species Metamasius callizona Katie Schulman, Dr. John Herman, Dr. Teresa Cooper Environmental Studies – Fall 2015 ABSTRACT Florida is home to the giant airplant, Tillandsia utriculata, an essential resource to multiple South Florida ecosystems because it acts as a habitat for many vertebrate and invertebrate organisms. Recently, T. utriculata has become endangered because of the exotic invasive arthropod species Metamasius callizona, the Mexican weevil. Once an adult weevil lays its eggs on the plant and the eggs hatch, the larvae mine the surrounding leaf area and meristem, the place at which new growth takes place in plants, which ultimately kills the air plant. In an attempt to protect the species, specimens have been collected with permits from the field, (Fakahatchee Strand Preserve and Okaloacoochee Slough State Forest), by local botanical gardens, Naples Botanical Garden and Marie Selby Botanical Gardens, to be quarantined. To rid the quarantined Tillandsias of the weevil, the use of a pesticide is the desired course of action because of the quickness and effectiveness. Currently, no research has tested the efficacy of pesticide control on M. callizona within a laboratory setting. This study tested the efficacy of four chemically different systemic insecticides, (imidacloprid, dinotefuran, azadirachtin, and Isoclast™ Active), by analyzing weevil larva mortality over Figure 6. Petri dishes separated by pesticide group before experiment one Figure 1. Tillandsia utriculata [Photograph]. Retreived from http://www.bandabou.info/Bromeliaceae.htm time. INTRODUCTION Discussion ® Host-plant species, which not only provide food to herbivores, can provide an assortment of While Safari and AzaSol™ caused a higher percentage of mortalities during experiment one • ® other resources for various organisms.
    [Show full text]
  • In Memoriam: Michael C
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Insecta Mundi Florida 12-25-2020 In Memoriam: Michael C. Thomas. May 5, 1948–October 4, 2019 Paul E. Skelley Florida State Collection of Arthropods, [email protected] J. H. Frank University of Florida, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi Part of the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons, and the Entomology Commons Skelley, Paul E. and Frank, J. H., "In Memoriam: Michael C. Thomas. May 5, 1948–October 4, 2019" (2020). Insecta Mundi. 1325. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi/1325 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Florida at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Insecta Mundi by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. A journal of world insect systematics INSECTA MUNDI 0829 In Memoriam: Michael C. Thomas Page Count: 32 May 5, 1948–October 4, 2019 Paul E. Skelley Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services Division of Plant Industry - Florida State Collection of Arthropods 1911 SW 34th St. Gainesville, Florida 32608 USA J. Howard Frank University of Florida Department of Entomology and Nematology Building 970, Natural Area Dr. Gainesville, FL 32611, USA Michael C. Thomas Festschrift Contribution Date of issue: December 25, 2020 Center for Systematic Entomology, Inc., Gainesville, FL Skelley PE, Frank JH. 2020. In Memoriam: Michael C. Thomas. May 5, 1948–October 4, 2019. Insecta Mundi 0829: 1–32. Published on December 25, 2020 by Center for Systematic Entomology, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Metamasius Mosieri Barber Page 1 of 9
    Florida bromeliad weevil - Metamasius mosieri Barber Page 1 of 9 Entomology & Nematology | FDACS/DPI | EDIS Search Go common name: Florida bromeliad weevil (suggested common name) scientific name: Metamasius mosieri Barber (Insecta: Coleoptera: Curculionidae) Introduction and Distribution - Description - Host Plants - Biology and Damage - Management - Selected References Introduction (Back to Top) Metamasius mosieri Barber is native to Cuba and the Dominican Republic and likely to southern Florida. Until recently, it was rarely collected in Florida (most likely because until recently no specific effort was made to find it). It has been reported from Collier (Corkscrew Swamp, Rookery Bay, Collier-Seminole State Park, Fakahatchee Strand), Glades (Fisheating Creek), Hendry (LaBelle, Big Cypress Seminole Reservation) Sarasota (Laurel), Lee, Dade, St. Lucie and Osceola Counties. The Florida bromeliad weevil is an occasional and minor pest on ornamental bromeliads and occurs at very low population densities in its natural habitat. It should not be confused with the Mexican bromeliad weevil, Metamasius callizona, which is currently attacking five species of native bromeliads in 16 counties and will likely destroy populations of six additional species of already-threatened or endangered bromeliads if not brought under control. Description (Back to Top) The Florida bromeliad weevil is considerably smaller than the other two species of Metamasius weevils currently found in Florida. The adult is 6 to 11 mm in length, with males usually slightly smaller than females. Adults are red and black, with most of the thorax and upper half of the elytra being red, and they have two black spots about midway on the elytra. There is some variation in the size and shape of these spots, and occasionally two additional, smaller black spots are present above them.
    [Show full text]