Imperialism and Its Class Structure in 1997 by MC5, July 22, 1997, Edited for Proofreading Mistakes August 8, 1999
Maoist Internationalist Movement Imperialism and Its Class Structure in 1997 by MC5, July 22, 1997, edited for proofreading mistakes August 8, 1999 A. Marxist-Leninist-Maoist definitions 1. Internationalism in the era of imperialist war From the perspective of communists in the United $tates the class structure in the imperialist countries of Western Europe is important, because the conditions are similar. Many comrades have asked us if we have done a concrete analysis to show that the class structure in Europe is similar to the one in the United $tates. We exclude Greece, Portugal and Spain; although the latter in particular may be an imperialist country as gauged by the existence of monopoly capitalist corporations. We exclude these countries, because an analysis of their imperialist character is not so clear-cut. By covering just the four big imperialists--England, France, Germany and Italy, we cover a population approximating that in the United States. However, in this essay we also include other imperialist countries including Japan. Of course, we have also taken the position that some countries of Europe such as Albania are not imperialist at all. In Albania and Russia there is in fact a white proletariat unlike the situation of the majority of Western Europeans. A. Marxist-Leninist-Maoist Definitions 1. Internationalism in the era of imperialist world war Engaging in a polemic amongst European communists, Lenin put forward the ideological orientation and tactics of internationalism in the imperialist countries. “I must argue, not from the point of view of ʻmyʼ country (for that is the argument of a wretched, stupid, petty-bourgeois nationalist who does not realize that he is only a plaything in the hands of the imperialist bourgeoisie), but from the point of view of my share in the preparation, in the propaganda, and in the acceleration of the world proletarian revolution.
[Show full text]