DOCSLIB.ORG

The New Value Controversy and the Foundations of Economics

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The New Value Controversy and the Foundations of Economics The New Value Controversy and the Foundations of Economics Edited by Alan Freeman University of Greenwich, UK Andrew Kliman Pace University, USA Julian Wells The Open University, UK Edward Elgar Cheltenham, UK • Northampton, MA, USA ©Alan Freeman, Andrew Kliman, Julian Wells 2004 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical or photocopying, recording, or otherwise without the prior permission of the publisher. Published by Edward Elgar Publishing Limited Glensanda House Montpellier Parade Cheltenham Glos GL50 lUA UK Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc. 136 West Street Suite 202 Northampton Massachusetts 01060 USA A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Congress Cataloguing in Publication Data The new value controversy and the foundations of economics I edited by Alan Freeman, Andrew Kliman, Julian Wells. p. em. Includes bibliographical references and index. 1. Labor theory of value. 2. Equilibrium (Economics) 3. Marxian economics. I. Freeman, Alan, 1946- II. Kliman, Andrew, 1955- III. Wells, Julian, 1950- HB206.N48 2004 335.4' 12-dc22 2003049380 ISBN 1 84064 560 1 Printed and bound in Great Britain by MPG Books Ltd, Bodmin, Cornwall Contents List of contributors vii Introduction ix 1. Rhetoric and Substance in Value Theory: an Appraisal of the New Orthodox Marxism David Laibman 2. Marx versus the '20th-Century Marxists': a Reply to Laibman 19 Andrew Kliman 3. The Return to Marx: Retreat or Advance 37 Fred Moseley 4. The Case for Simplicity: a Paradigm for the Political Economy of the 21st Century 55 Alan Freeman 5. Labour, Money, Labour-Saving Innovation and the Falling Rate clProfu 67 Alejandro Ramos Martinez 6. The Other Side of the Class Relation: Women, Money and Commodities in Capitalism 85 Ann Davis 7. Value, Abstract Labour and Exchange Equivalence 107 Bruce Roberts 8. The Duality of Labour 13 5 Ted McGlone and Andrew Kliman 9. On the Abstraction of Labour as a Social Determination 151 Mario L. Robles-Baez 10. Defining the Concreteness of the Abstract and its Measure: Notes on the Relation between Key Concepts in Marx's Theory of Capitalism 167 Massimo DeAngelis 11. Forms of Existence of Abstract Labour and Value-Form 181 Stavros D. Mavroudeas 12. Calculating Labour Values Empirically 199 Edward B. Chilcote v vi The New Value Controversy 13. Socialism and Value Categories in Early Soviet Doctrine: Lenin, Trotsky, Bukharin, Preobrazhensky 219 Paresh Chattopadhyay 14. Value's Law, Value's Metric 233 W Paul Cockshott and Allin F. Cottrell 15. Towards an Empirical Measurement of International Transfers of Value 241 Paul Cooney 16. Some Empirical Considerations for the Question of Transformation 261 Rebecca Kalmans 17. Devalorisation, Crises, and Capital Accumulation in the Late 19th Century US 275 Michael Perelman ] Appendix: IWGVT Scholarship Guidelines 287 Bibliography 29/ Index 309 Contributors Massimo DeAngelis is Senior Lecturer in Economics, University of East London, UK. Paresh Chattopadhyay teaches political economy at the University of Quebec at Montreal, Canada. Edward B. Chilcote works as a SAS programmer and analyst in New York City. W. Paul Cockshott is a Reader in the Department of Computer Science, University of Glasgow, UK. Paul Cooney works at the Center for the Biology of Natural Systems at Queens College, Flushing, NY, USA. Allin F. Cottrell is Professor of Economics at Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, USA. Ann Davis is on the economics faculty of Marist College, Poughkeepsie, NY, USA, and is the founding director of the Marist College Bureau of Economic Research. Alan Freeman is a Visiting Fellow in the economics department of the University of Greenwich, UK. Rebecca Kalmans is Associate Professor of Economics at the State Univer­ sity of New York, Old Westbury, NY, USA. Andrew Kliman is Associate Professor of Economics, Pace University, Pleasantville, NY, USA. David Laibman is Professor of Economics at City University of New York, vii viii The New Value Controversy NY, USA Ted McGlone is Associate Professor of Economics at Saint Joseph's College, Patchogue, NY, USA Stavros Mavroudeas is Associate Professor in the Department of Economic Studies, University of Macedonia, Thessaloniki, Greece. Fred Moseley is Professor of Economics at Mount Holyoke College, South Hadley, MA, USA. Michael Perelman is Professor of Economics at California State University, Chico, CA, USA Alejandro Ramos Martinez is a researcher with the Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean, Santiago, Chile. Bruce Roberts is Professor of Economics at the University of Southern Maine, Portland, ME, USA. Mario L. Robles-Baez teaches economics and political economy at the Departmento de Producci6n Econ6mica, Universidad Aut6noma Metropolitana-Xochimilco, Mexico City, Mexico. Julian Wells is Associate Lecturer of Economics at The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK. Introduction The papers in this volume reflect a critical stage in the evolution of the modern reappraisal of Marx's value theory and critique of political economy. They represent the first response by Marxist scholars to the debate initiated by Marx and Non-equilibrium Economics (Freeman and Carchedi 1996), a work that presented, for the first time in book form, what has become known as the Tem­ poral Single-System Interpretation (TSSI) of Marx's value theory.' In the first part of this volume, comprising chapters 1-11, the key underly­ ing theoretical questions at issue are debated in depth. The second, more ex­ ploratory, section compirising chapters 12-18, is dedicated to a range of new or under-debated questions which, in the light of the TSSI and other new interpre­ tations of Marx's value theory, are recognised to be deserving of renewed schol­ arship. The TSS interpretation is controversial because it challenges a prior con­ sensus within Marxist scholarship. In Duncan Foley's (1997:493) words, it 'endorses Marx's treatment of the transformation problem', that is, the account of the transformation of commodity values into prices of production given in Chapter 9 of Capital, Vol. III. It also offers the first refutation of Okishio's (1961) famous theorem, which had supposedly disproved Marx's claim that cost-reducing technical change tends to lower the rate of profit. In both cases, it confirms the logical coherence of Marx's theoretical results without 'correct­ ing' or replacing Marx's own presentation of his own views. INCONSISTENCY AS JUSTIFICATION FOR CENSORSHIP By any objective standard, the significance of these findings is enormous. In the current historical context, they have an implication extending beyond the specialist study of value theory: they remove the only serious justification offered for the near-total exclusion of Marx's own ideas by mainstream eco­ nomics. Empirically, Marx's fundamental economic judgements, rediscovered by the press in every crisis, have stood the test of time in contrast to many once­ fashionable notions. Who today remembers the conventional wisdom of the sixties, that planners have successfully fine-tuned crisis out of the market ix X The New Value Controversy economy? Or the Nobel Prize-winning bull market gurus of the nineties who, as the Financial Times put it, 'festooned' the boards of today's ignominious stock market failures? In contrast, as Cassidy (1997) notes: Many of the contradictions that [Marx] saw in Victorian capitalism and that were subsequently addressed by reformist governments have begun re­ appearing in new guises, like mutant viruses .... He wrote riveting passages about globalisation, inequality, political corruption, monopolization, tech­ nical progress, the decline of high culture, and the enervating nature of modern existence- issues that economists are now confronting anew, some­ times without realizing that they are walking in Marx's footsteps. Nevertheless, the theory and concepts from which Marx's insights stem are deemed unmentionable in economics. It is insufficiently appreciated that eco­ nomics, which claims to be the most, if not the only, truly scientific discipline among the social sciences, treats Marx quite differently than its 'less scientific' sister disciplines. As Brewer ( 1995: 111) notes: By any normal standard, he should not be accorded a significant position in the history of economics at all. It is not just that his ideas are not to be found in modern textbooks, but that they were never seriously discussed by main­ stream economists, either during or after his lifetime. In standard undergraduate courses in virtually every liberal arts or social sci­ ence subject other than economics, Marx has a place. He is treated as a theorist whose views should at least be known, even if only to reject them. In econom­ ics he is not merely rejected: his ideas are simply not to be found. The mere word 'value' is received by everyone but tax collectors as a signifier of subver­ sive intent. 'Positive' economic science has purged itself of the concept. It thereby systematically excludes an entire theory from consideration. Any economist who seriously seeks to develop Marx's own ideas, in their original form, in however scholarly a manner, must recognise some basic facts. She is unlikely to be published in mainstream journals; she will not be promoted -at least on the strength of her Marxist scholarship; she is unlikely to secure ten­ ure; and she will not be allowed to incorporate her research into her teaching at least until graduate level, and then only in a few islands of liberalism. The charge of inconsistency is a central pivot of this suppression. Without it, no rational basis for excluding Marx remains. Of course, we are not foolish enough to claim that reason has great bearing on what economists choose to teach, study or fund. But Marx's spectre haunts them still. The anti-globalist movement questions a ceaseless thirst for profit masquerading as a natural order, and searches for a more comprehensible ex- Introduction xi planation of how capitalism really works.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Conversations with Stalin on Questions of Political Economy”
    WOODROW WILSON INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR SCHOLARS Lee H. Hamilton, Conversations with Stalin on Christian Ostermann, Director Director Questions of Political Economy BOARD OF TRUSTEES: ADVISORY COMMITTEE: Joseph A. Cari, Jr., by Chairman William Taubman Steven Alan Bennett, Ethan Pollock (Amherst College) Vice Chairman Chairman Working Paper No. 33 PUBLIC MEMBERS Michael Beschloss The Secretary of State (Historian, Author) Colin Powell; The Librarian of Congress James H. Billington James H. Billington; (Librarian of Congress) The Archivist of the United States John W. Carlin; Warren I. Cohen The Chairman of the (University of Maryland- National Endowment Baltimore) for the Humanities Bruce Cole; The Secretary of the John Lewis Gaddis Smithsonian Institution (Yale University) Lawrence M. Small; The Secretary of Education James Hershberg Roderick R. Paige; (The George Washington The Secretary of Health University) & Human Services Tommy G. Thompson; Washington, D.C. Samuel F. Wells, Jr. PRIVATE MEMBERS (Woodrow Wilson Center) Carol Cartwright, July 2001 John H. Foster, Jean L. Hennessey, Sharon Wolchik Daniel L. Lamaute, (The George Washington Doris O. Mausui, University) Thomas R. Reedy, Nancy M. Zirkin COLD WAR INTERNATIONAL HISTORY PROJECT THE COLD WAR INTERNATIONAL HISTORY PROJECT WORKING PAPER SERIES CHRISTIAN F. OSTERMANN, Series Editor This paper is one of a series of Working Papers published by the Cold War International History Project of the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars in Washington, D.C. Established in 1991 by a grant from the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, the Cold War International History Project (CWIHP) disseminates new information and perspectives on the history of the Cold War as it emerges from previously inaccessible sources on “the other side” of the post-World War II superpower rivalry.
    [Show full text]
  • Advertising and the Creation of Exchange Value
    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Doctoral Dissertations Dissertations and Theses Summer November 2014 Advertising and the Creation of Exchange Value Zoe Sherman University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_2 Part of the Economic History Commons, Political Economy Commons, and the Public Relations and Advertising Commons Recommended Citation Sherman, Zoe, "Advertising and the Creation of Exchange Value" (2014). Doctoral Dissertations. 205. https://doi.org/10.7275/5625701.0 https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_2/205 This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Dissertations and Theses at ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ADVERTISING AND THE CREATION OF EXCHANGE VALUE A Dissertation Presented by ZOE SHERMAN Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts Amherst in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY September 2014 Economics © Copyright by Zoe Sherman 2014 All Rights Reserved ADVERTISING AND THE CREATION OF EXCHANGE VALUE A Dissertation Presented by ZOE SHERMAN Approved as to style and content by: ______________________________________ Gerald Friedman, Chair ______________________________________ Michael Ash, Member ______________________________________ Judith Smith, Member ___________________________________ Michael Ash, Department Chair Economics DEDICATION Dedicated to the memory of Stephen Resnick. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I have had many strokes of good fortune in my life, not least the intellectual and emotional support I have enjoyed throughout my graduate studies. Stephen Resnick, Gerald Friedman, Michael Ash, and Judith Smith were the midwives of this work.
    [Show full text]
  • The Limits of Ricardian Value: Law, Contingency and Motion in Economics
    Munich Personal RePEc Archive The limits of Ricardian value: law, contingency and motion in economics Freeman, Alan The University of Greenwich March 1999 Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/2574/ MPRA Paper No. 2574, posted 05 Apr 2007 UTC The Limits of Ricardian Value: Law, Contingency and Motion in Economics Alan Freeman The University of Greenwich March 1999 ABSTRACT This paper discusses the relation between law and contingency in the formation of value. It begins from a much-ignored assertion of Marx, repeated throughout his works, that the equality of supply and demand is contingent and their non-equality constitutes their law. This highly complex and original idea leads us to the idea of capitalism, and a market, as an entity which perpetuates itself by failing to perpetuate itself: it is the fact that supply diverges from demand which causes the system to continue, not the fact that supply equals demand, which is only the case as a statistical average and never exactly holds. This fundamental and unrecognised difference between Marx’s approach and that of the classicals also distinguishes Marx from most modern economics, which has focussed on equilibrium as the de facto defining principle from which value may be deduced. The problem is exactly the opposite: it is to define a conception of value which does not require equilibrium and makes no presupposition that supply equals demand, that goods are sold, that profits equalise, or that any of the ‘lawlike’ properties of an ideal market actually hold. The ‘lawlike’ properties of a market must then be deduced as an outcome of the dynamic, that is temporal, behaviour of the market, expressed in terms of the interaction between value so defined and use value.
    [Show full text]
  • The Falling Rate of Profit Thesis Reassessed: Owart D a Sociology of Marx’S Value Theory of Labor
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 8-2007 The Falling Rate of Profit Thesis Reassessed: owarT d a Sociology of Marx’s Value Theory of Labor John Hamilton Bradford University of Tennessee - Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Part of the Sociology Commons Recommended Citation Bradford, John Hamilton, "The Falling Rate of Profit Thesis Reassessed: owarT d a Sociology of Marx’s Value Theory of Labor. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 2007. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/261 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by John Hamilton Bradford entitled "The Falling Rate of Profit Thesis Reassessed: owarT d a Sociology of Marx’s Value Theory of Labor." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Master of Arts, with a major in Sociology. Harry F. Dahms, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: Stephanie Ann Bohon, Robert Gorman Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by John Hamilton Bradford entitled “The Falling Rate of Profit Thesis Reassessed: Toward a Sociology of Marx’s Value Theory of Labor.” I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts, with a major in Sociology.
    [Show full text]
  • Marxism Without Marx: a Note Towards a Critique
    Capital & Class 34(1) 84 –97 Marxism without Marx: © The Author(s) 2010 Reprints and permission: sagepub. co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav A note towards a critique DOI: 10.1177/0309816809353585 c&c.sagepub.com Alan Freeman University of Manitoba, Canada Abstract The most severe economic crisis since 1929 has produced a level of intellectual disarray probably not seen since 1968. In one crucial respect, the climate is different: Marxism’s intellectual impact is negligible. The culprit is not Marx but ‘Marxism without Marx’—a systematic attempt to divorce his conclusions from his economic theory. The demise of western Marxism marks the failure of this project. This note signals a first attempt to assess Marx’s real relevance to the crisis of 2008. Keywords economics, Marx, value, temporalism, TSSI The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear. (Antonio Gramsci) The most severe economic crisis since 1929 has produced a level of intellectual disarray probably not seen since 1968. Yet in one crucial respect the climate is different: Marxism’s intellectual impact, in western circles at least, is negligible. The culprit, I show in this article, is not Marx himself but a trend I term ‘Marxism without Marx’—a systematic attempt to divorce his conclusions from his economic theory. The demise of western Marxism marks the definitive failure of this project. Its difficulties reflect wider problems facing the left, acerbically summarized by Thomas Walcom (2009). ‘Capitalism is facing its worst crisis in 70 years’, he writes, yet the political movement that prides itself on its critique of the economic status quo is, to all intents and purposes, missing in action … [T]he Great Depression was the left’s time.
    [Show full text]
  • Underdevelopment in a Capital-Rich Economy Ahmed H
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 1983 Underdevelopment in a capital-rich economy Ahmed H. Senani Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Part of the Sociology Commons Recommended Citation Senani, Ahmed H., "Underdevelopment in a capital-rich economy " (1983). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 8959. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/8959 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This reproduction was made from a copy of a document sent to us for microfilming. While the most advanced technology has been used to photograph and reproduce this document, the quality of the reproduction is heavily dependent upon the quality of the material submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help clarify markings or notations which may appear on this reproduction. 1. The sign or "target" for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Page(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting through an image and duplicating adjacent pages to assure complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a round black mark; it is aji indication of either blurred copy because of movement during exposure, duplicate copy, or copyrighted materials that should not have been filmed.
    [Show full text]
  • Andrew Kliman
    ANDREW KLIMAN The Failure of Capitalist Production Underlying Causes of the Great Recession THE FAILURE OF CAPITALIST PRODUCTION Underlying Causes of the Great Recession Andrew Kliman ^fpy) PlutoPress www.plutobooks.com In memory of Ted Kliman (1929-2009) and Chris Harman (1942-2009) For Jesse For Anne Contents List o f Tables viii List o f Figures ix List of Abbreviations xi Acknowledgments xii 1 Introduction 1 2 Profitability, the Credit System, and the “ Destruction of Capital” 13 3 Double, Double, Toil and Trouble: Dot-com Boom and Home-price Bubble 28 4 The 1970s—Not the 1980s—as Turning Point 48 5 Falling Rates of Profit and Accumulation 74 6 The Current-cost “ Rate of Profit” 102 7 W hy the Rate of Profit Fell 123 8 The Underconsumptionist Alternative 151 9 What is to be Undone? 181 Notes 208 Bibliography 227 Index 234 List of Tables 2.1 Non-Linear Effect of Falling Profitability on Business Failures 17 4.1 Growth Rates of Real GDP Per Capita 53 4.2 Sovereign Debt Defaults and Restructurings, 1946-2005 57 4.3 Debt and GDP, U.S. 61 5.1 Rates of Profit, U.S. Corporations, Selected Trough Years 82 6.1 Rates of Profit and Equity-market Rates of Return 117 7.1 Rapid Depreciation of Computer Equipment 142 8.1 Real Income G rowth, U.S., 1979-2007 160 8.2 The Final Part of Output and Economic Growth 163 8.3 Initial Situation 169 8.4 First Ten Periods 172 8.5 W orldwide G rowth of Real GDP since 1600 174 8.6 Investment and Growth, 1965-92 Averages 176 ‘>.1 Pay, Exports, and Economic G rowth in the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • From Congress of Afrikan People to Revolutionary
    UNITY ·STRUGGLE VOL. V NO. 6 25 CENTS POLITICA L ORGAN OF THE REVO LUTIONARY COMMUNIST LEAGU E (M-L- M) JUNE EDITION 1976 A Summation and A Beginning FROMCONGRESS OFAFRIKAN PEOPLE TO REVOLUTIONARYCOMMUNIST LEAGUE (M-L-M) Such leader s as H. Rap Brown , Maulana Karenga, Amiri Baraka, and Floyd RCL (M~L-M) is convinced that the clearest way for us to dra w the line of demar­ Mc Kissick were at the '67 Bla ck Power Conference. The early history of CAP's cation between genuine Marxism-Leninism and modern revisionism today is to use developmen t involved the Rebellions of 1967 and the Black Power Conference in the suffix (M-L-M) and in our practice continously uphold and defend the ba nner of Newark , N.J ., which represented the diversity of the Black Liberation Movement in Mao Tse Tung Thought, which is, "the acme of Marxism-Lenin ism in the prese nt 1967, bu t also the eclecticism that characterized BLM in the absence of a genuine era". communi st party in the U.S.A. And still today we need a revolutionary Marxist­ Lenini st part y, guided by the science of Marxism-Leninism-Mao Tse Tung Thought to lead the proletariat and oppressed nationalities to smash imperialism with Revolutionary socialist revoluti on. Party building is the central task of Marxist-Leninist and ad­ vanced forces in the U.S. toda y. Communist League History of CAP (M-L-M) STAGE ONE reference to such backwardness) . WORLD SITUATION Social-imperialism on the other , these .
    [Show full text]
  • Trends in Value Theory Since 1881
    Munich Personal RePEc Archive Trends in Value Theory since 1881 Freeman, Alan London Metropolitan University 7 December 2010 Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/48646/ MPRA Paper No. 48646, posted 27 Jul 2013 04:31 UTC TRENDS IN VALUE THEORY SINCE 1881 Alan Freeman London Metropolitan University Abstract: This is a prepublication version of an article which originally appeared in the World Review of Political Economy. Please cite as Freeman, A. 2010. ‘Trends in Value Theory since 1881’, World Review of Political Economy Volume 1 No. 4, Fall 2010. pp567-605. The article surveys the key ideas and currents of thinking about Marx’s value theory since he died. It does so by studying their evolution, in their historical context, through the lens of the Temporal Single System Interpretation (TSSI) of Marx’s ideas, an approach to Marx’s theory of value which has secured significant attention in recent years. The article explains the TSSI and highlights the milestones which led to the evolution of its key concepts. Key words: theory of value; Marxian economics; TSSI; New Solution; temporalism JEL codes: B24, B3, B5, B50 Page 1 of 37 TRENDS IN VALUE THEORY SINCE 1881 Alan Freeman Introduction1 This article summarizes the key ideas and currents of thinking about Marx’s value theory since he died. It does so by studying their evolution, in their historical context, through the lens of the Temporal Single System Interpretation (TSSI) of Marx’s ideas, an approach to Marx’s theory of value which has secured significant attention in recent years. The article explains the TSSI and highlights the milestones which led to the evolution of its key concepts.
    [Show full text]
  • Financialization, the Great Recession and the Rate of Profit
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Lund University Publications - Student Papers Master programme in Economic History Financialization, the Great Recession, and the rate of profit: profitability trends in the US corporate business sector, 1946-2011 Themistoklis Kalogerakos [email protected] Abstract: The tendential fall in the rate of profit lies in the center of a long-lasting debate among Marxist scholarship on its centrality and empirical relevance in the investigation of structural crises. Without neglecting the financial aspect of the current crisis, which is covered in the vast majority of academic accounts, we try to discover its underlying roots in the entire spectrum of capitalist production in the US, in reference with that debate. Our empirical evidence indicates that the US economy experiences an inability to recover profit rates to the high levels of the first postwar decades on a sustainable basis. It is proposed that this is due to the reluctance of policy makers to allow the vast destruction of unproductive capital, because such a process entails a potential systemic risk for the established socioeconomic and political status-quo. Key words: Falling rate of profit, US economy, structural crisis, Great Recession, Marx, financialization, profitability trends EKHR61 Master thesis (15 credits ECTS) August 2013 Supervisor: Anders Ögren Examiner: Kerstin Enflo Website www.ehl.lu.se Themistoklis Kalogerakos EKHR61 Economic History: First Year 870106-5495 Independent
    [Show full text]
  • The Whiggish Foundations of Marxian and Sraffian Economics by Andrew
    The Whiggish Foundations of Marxian and Sraffian Economics by Andrew Kliman Department of Economics, Pace University, Pleasantville, NY 10570. [email protected] For Association for Heterodox Economics conference, Bristol, UK, July 2007. Draft, May 15, 2007. Please to not quote without permission. Citation permitted. Introduction Whig historians construct a story of linear progress. This paper first reviews salient criticisms of this approach to the historiography of ideas, focusing especially on its suppression of cross- theoretical "incommensurabilities" and how Whig historiography sanctions practices that hinder the development of ideas. This discussion is then brought to bear upon the modern controversy over Marx's value theory. The paper argues that Samuelson's self-consciously Whiggish critique of Marx in 1971 set, and continues to set, the ground of debate. It also argues that the alleged inconsistencies in Marx's theory are produced by Whiggish (mis-)interpretation. Marx is read as if he were a modern static equilibrium theorist, which distorts his arguments and produces "internal" inconsistency. Finally, the paper argues that the refutations of the proofs of inconsistency undercut Marxist and Sraffian economists' claims to be improving upon Marx's original theory. Rather than linear progress having occurred through correction of error, the original theory and the revisions of it are simply different, and the former re-emerges as a viable alternative to the latter. Whiggism vs. Pluralism Whiggishness and pluralism are antithetical. One can be against both Whig history and pluralistic practice (as Thomas Kuhn seems to have been, up to a point), but one cannot be in favor of both.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 All Value-Form, No Value-Substance: Comments On
    All Value-Form, No Value-Substance: Comments on Moseley’s New Book Andrew Kliman, May 11, 2016 A number of people have written to me, wanting to know what I think of Fred Moseley’s (2016) new book. So I’ve reluctantly decided to address this matter, in order to show that he hasn’t smashed the temporal single-system interpretation (TSSI) of the quantitative dimension of Marx’s value theory, even though I think that this response will prove to be a waste of time and effort. In truth, my efforts to engage with the Marxian economists during the last three decades have consistently been a waste of time and effort. Their primary aim is to hawk their wares—promote their “approaches”—not to get at the truth, resolve outstanding issues, or better understand Marx’s work if a better understanding comes into conflict with their “approaches.” Even some former proponents of the temporal single-system interpretation (TSSI) of the quantitative dimension of Marx’s value theory have refashioned themselves as purveyors of a so-called “temporal approach.” Moreover, those who have turned to Marx since the Great Recession have, unfortunately, largely imbibed these norms. In some cases, promoting one’s “approach” is conducive to their own careerist aspirations. In other cases, they can’t be bothered trying to force open a genuine debate and trying to ensure that it doesn’t just display wares for them to choose among, but decides outstanding matters. It still other cases, they are just unfamiliar with anything but hawking wares. And there are still more than a few opponents of reason around, postmodernist and otherwise.
    [Show full text]