DOCSLIB.ORG

The Ukrainian Weekly, 2021

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Ukrainian Weekly, 2021 INSIDE: l Euro-Maidan activist fights to save his child’s life – page 8 l New research on migration of highly qualified professionals from Ukraine – page 11 l Plast scouts in the U.S. carry on despite impact of COVID-19 – page 13 THE UKRAINIAN WEEKLY Published by the Ukrainian National Association Inc., a fraternal non-profit association Vol. LXXXIX No. 19 THE UKRAINIAN WEEKLY SUNDAY, MAY 9, 2021 $2.00 Government ousts Naftogaz chief, Top U.S. envoy Blinken visits Kyiv, says Washington undermining corporate governance standards considering more military assistance to Ukraine by Roman Tymotsko 2016-2020. But in 2020 the company reported negative financial results. KYIV – Ukraine’s government appointed Together Messrs. Kobolyev and Vitrenko Yuriy Vitrenko as the new CEO of state- influenced the success of Naftogaz, working owned giant Naftogaz on April 28, replacing side by side from 2014 until 2020 when Andriy Kobolyev, who had led the enter- they parted roads due to conflicting visions prise since 2014. The move, which occurred for the company’s future. the day after the national oil and gas com- The company won a historic victory for pany reported a loss in 2020 of $684 mil- Ukraine in an arbitration case decided in lion, was taken by Ukraine’s Cabinet of Stockholm when both Messrs. Kobolyev Ministers, which used a legal loophole to rid and Vitrenko managed Naftogaz. That arbi- themselves of Mr. Kobolyev. tration proceeding between Ukrainian and The Cabinet of Ministers dismissed the Russian national gas companies ultimately entire Naftogaz Board of Directors for a day became the largest commercial arbitration and rehired all but Mr. Kobolyev a day later. ever. During the short interval when the board Mutual claims in that case amounted to was technically absent, the government roughly $125 billion, which threatened to added Mr. Vitrenko as the new CEO of bankrupt both Gazprom and Naftogaz. The Naftogaz, Ukraine’s largest taxpayer in the Stockholm arbitration satisfied Naftogaz’s Office of the President of Ukraine country. Mr. Kobolyev was not informed of claim for compensation of $4.63 billion for Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy (left) met with U.S. Secretary of State the government’s decision. Gazprom’s failure to deliver the agreed vol- Antony Blinken in Kyiv on May 6. “I learned about the ‘dismissal’ from the ume of gas transited to Ukraine from Russia. news,” Mr. Kobolyev wrote on Facebook Following Naftogaz’s recent reported by Mark Raczkiewycz Victoria Nuland as the delegation met with shortly after the government’s decision losses, the Cabinet of Ministers made the Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, went public. decision to remove Mr. Kobolyev, a move KYIV – U.S. Secretary of State Antony Prime Minister Denys Shmyhal, Foreign Most of Ukraine’s state-owned compa- largely viewed as undermining the compa- Blinken on May 6 paid a one-day visit to Affairs Minister Dmytro Kuleba, presiden- nies used to be highly unprofitable, drain- ny’s corporate governance system. The use Ukraine where he reiterated U.S. govern- tial office head Andriy Yermak, parliamen- ing the country’s budget. However, after the of that system was one of the reasons ana- ment support for the country’s sovereignty tary faction heads and leaders of civil soci- Revolution of Dignity, some became profit- lysts said the company became profitable and territorial integrity in the face of ety organizations. able due to corporate governance reforms. in the first place. Russia’s ongoing aggression. Mr. Blinken said the U.S. “is seriously Naftogaz was among the profitable group, The top U.S. diplomat was accompanied considering increasing security assistance,” showing net gains four years running, from (Continued on page 9) by Undersecretary for Political Affairs while noting that much of the more than 100,000 Russian troops and military hard- ware that amassed at Ukraine’s state bor- der remain there following military drills Last suspect in killing of journalist Sheremet last month. “We are monitoring the situation close- ly,” he added. Regarding the war with released from jail, placed under house arrest Russian-led forces in eastern Ukraine, Mr. Blinken said “there are daily casualties by Mark Raczkiewycz along the contact line, and cyberattacks, KYIV – After 506 days in jail, the last of the three suspects in and use of force…thus we are against the high-profile murder of journalist Pavel Sheremet was Russia destabilizing the situation in released on April 30 and placed under round-the-clock house Ukraine.” arrest with an electronic monitoring device. By making Ukraine his first destination Upon hearing the judge partly grant his defense motion in a in Eastern Europe early into U.S. President Kyiv court, Andriy Antonenko, 49, said the first emotion he felt Joe Biden’s term, the secretary of state was of denial. underscored Washington’s commitment to “I was perplexed…at first, I didn’t believe they were going to the two countries’ strategic partnership. release me,” he told The Ukrainian Weekly in an exclusive inter- The visit comes amid Kyiv’s vociferous view conducted over the phone on May 5. aspiration for NATO membership, requests Mr. Antonenko, who had been in pre-trial detention since for additional military assistance and per- December 2019, said he wasn’t satisfied that the case against him mission to purchase more advanced arms wasn’t closed “because the real issue here is it’s all a fabrication – from allies to defend against an increasing- they should’ve thrown the case out because my guilt has never ly belligerent Russia. been proven beyond a reasonable doubt,” he said in reference to Facebook page of Andriy Antonenko Since 2014, the U.S. has provided Ukraine more than $4.6 billion in assis- Belarus-born Russian citizen Pavel Sheremet who was killed in a Andriy Antonenko car explosion in the early morning hours of July 20, 2016. tance, including security and non-security At the time of his murder, Mr. Sheremet was employed at environment of impunity for attacks on activists and journalists aid. Radio Vesti and as a columnist for the online Ukrainian news who challenge vested interests and people of power in Ukraine. During the meeting, Mr. Zelenskyy source Ukrayinska Pravda. In his work he criticized the authori- On December 12, 2019, President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, Mr. expressed hope that at the NATO summit ties in Ukraine, Belarus and Russia. Avakov and then-chief prosecutor Ruslan Ryaboshapka jointly on June 14, discussions will begin on the His murder, which Internal Affairs Minister Arseniy Avakov prospect of Ukraine receiving an Action has attributed to his professional work, was a reminder of the (Continued on page 15) (Continued on page 12) 2 THE UKRAINIAN WEEKLY SUNDAY, MAY 9, 2021 No. 19 NEWS ANALYSIS One-on-one with Putin: G-7 seeks to counter ‘irresponsible’ behavior G-7 ministers said they were “deeply con- cerned about the deteriorating human The G-7 has wrapped up its first in-per- rights situation in Russia, and the systemat- a reckless adventure for Zelenskyy son meeting in more than two years with a ic crackdown on opposition voices, human pledge to bolster collective efforts to coun- prehensive list) would be a trophy for Mr. rights defenders, independent civil society, by Vladimir Socor ter Russia’s “irresponsible and destabiliz- Putin from a meeting with the Ukrainian and media.” (RFE/RL) ing” behavior, but offered little concrete “We should not let Mr. Zelenskyy and his president. action aside from expressing support for Russia says half a million passports issued team off the hook, but let them twist [wriggle, Mr. Yermak had guided Mr. Zelenskyy Ukraine. “We are deeply concerned that squirm] there,” Russian Foreign Affairs into accepting the Steinmeier Formula in the negative pattern of Russia’s irresponsi- Russia’s Internal Affairs Ministry says Minister Sergei Lavrov recently told reporters October 2019 as a ticket to the December ble and destabilizing behavior continues,” that more than 527,000 people in parts of (RIA Novosti, April 28). This is Mr. Lavrov’s 2019 Normandy summit; he agreed with the top diplomats of Britain, Canada, eastern Ukraine where Moscow-backed own style of signaling to Ukraine that Russia Mr. Kozak on a “consultative council” equal- separatist formations are waging a war France, Germany, Italy, Japan and the holds the commanding position to set the izing Kyiv with Donetsk-Luhansk in March against Kyiv have been granted Russian cit- United States said in a joint statement on agenda of President Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s 2020, as a price for the hoped-for April izenship over the past two years. The min- May 5 following talks in London. The minis- ardently sought meeting with his Kremlin 2020 Normandy summit (aborted following istry’s press service made the announce- ters cited “the large buildup of Russian mil- counterpart, President Vladimir Putin. Ukrainian civil society’s backlash); and he ment on May 2 to the state news agency itary forces on Ukraine’s borders and in Elaborating on Mr. Putin’s pre-conditions guided his president into accepting the July TASS. It said around 40 percent of applica- illegally annexed Crimea, its malign activi- (see EDM, April 28, 29) to such a meeting, tions had been rejected, citing expulsions 2020 agreement, again equalizing Kyiv with ties aimed at undermining other countries’ Russia’s top diplomat reaffirms that Mr. or restrictions on entry to Russia. Russian Donetsk-Luhansk (see above), which is why democratic systems, its malicious cyberac- Putin and himself (Mr. Lavrov) would not President Vladimir Putin in April 2019 Kyiv has backtracked on it since then. At tivity and use of disinformation.” The state- answer phone calls from their Ukrainian issued an order for a simplified and expe- present, Mr.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Impeachment of Donald J. Trump, President of the United States: Report of the Comm
    IN THE SENATEOF THEUNITED STATES Sitting as a Court of Impeachment Inre IMPEACHMENTOF PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP TRIAL MEMORANDUM OF THEUNITEDSTATES HOUSEOF REPRESENTATIVES IN THE IMPEACHMENTTRIALOF PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP United States House of Representatives AdamB.Schiff JerroldNadler Zoe Lofgren HakeemS.Jeffries Val ButlerDemings Jason Crow Sylvia R.Garcia U.S. House of RepresentativesManagers TABLEOF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................................1 BACKGROUND..............................................................................................................................................9 I. C ONSTITUTIONALG ROUNDSFORP RESIDENTIALI MPEACHMENT....................................................9 II. THE HOUSE’SIMPEACHMENTOF PRESIDENTDONALDJ. TRUMPANDPRESENTATIONOF T HISM ATTERTO THE S ENATE..............................................................................................................12 ARGUMENT...................................................................................................................................................16 I. T HE S ENATES HOULDC ONVICT P RESIDENTT RUMPOF A BUSEOF P OWER..................................16 A. PresidentTrumpExercisedHis OfficialPowerto PressureUkraineintoAidingHis Reelection....................................................................................................................................16 B. PresidentTrumpExercisedOfficialPowerto
    [Show full text]
  • Naftogaz of Ukraine 2014 Annual Report
    NAFTOGAZ OF UKRAINE 2014 ANNUAL REPORT New Ukraine Europe New rules Market Transparency Naftogaz Reform Europe New Ukraine Europe New rules Naftogaz Market Europe New UkraineNew Transparency Reform Ukraine Naftogaz New rules Europe Naftogaz New Ukraine Market Naftogaz Europe New Ukraine Reform Transparency Naftogaz EuropeReform Europe Naftogaz New Ukraine New rules Transparency New rules Transparency New rules Europe Transparency New Ukraine Naftogaz New rules Europe Market Reform Reform Naftogaz Market Reform TransparencyNew rules Reform Europe New rules Market Reform Transparency New Ukraine Transparency Transparency Naftogaz New Ukraine Naftogaz New rules Reform NaftogazTransparency Market New rules Reform Europe Reform Naftogaz New rules Europe Naftogaz New Ukraine Transparency Market Transparency New rules Naftogaz Transparency Reform Europe New rules Market New Ukraine New Ukraine Transparency New rules New rules Market Market New Ukraine Europe Transparency Reform Europe New Ukraine New Ukraine Naftogaz Transparency New rules Reform New rules Naftogaz New rules New Ukraine Reform Market Europe New rules ReformNaftogaz Transparency Europe Reform Naftogaz Transparency Reform MarketNaftogaz Reform Naftogaz New rules Naftogaz New Ukraine Market Market Naftogaz Transparency Transparency Reform Europe Transparency New rules New rules New rules Reform New Ukraine Market Transparency New rules Naftogaz Market Europe Changing for the future Ukraine’s gas transmission Entry capacity: EUROPE’S LARGEST GAS MARKETS, 2014, bcm NAFTOGAZ AT A
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report the PARLIAMENTARY ASSEMBLY of the MEDITERRANEAN
    PARLIAMENTARY ASSEMBLY OF THE MEDITERRANEAN ASSEMBLEE PARLEMENTAIRE DE LA MEDITERRANEE اﻟﺠﻤﻌﻴﺔ اﻟﺒﺮﻟﻤﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﺒﺤﺮ اﻷﺑﻴﺾ اﻟﻤﺘﻮﺳﻂ a v n a C © 2020 Annual Report THE PARLIAMENTARY ASSEMBLY OF THE MEDITERRANEAN The Parliamentary Assembly of the Mediterranean (PAM) is an international organization, which brings together 34 member parliaments from the Euro-Mediterranean and Gulf regions to discuss the most pressing common challenges, such as regional conflicts, security and counterterrorism, humanitarian crises, economic integration, climate change, mass migrations, education, human rights and inter-faith dialogue. Through this unique political forum, PAM Parliaments are able to engage in productive discussions, share legislative experience, and work together towards constructive solutions. a v n 2 a C © CONTENTS FOREWORD 4 14TH PLENARY SESSION 6 REPORT OF ACTIVITIES 9 1ST STANDING COMMITTEE - POLITICAL AND SECURITY-RELATED COOPERATION 11 2ND STANDING COMMITTEE - ECONOMIC, SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL COOPERATION 16 3RD STANDING COMMITTEE - DIALOGUE AMONG CIVILIZATIONS AND HUMAN RIGHTS 21 KEY EVENTS 2020 28 PAM 2020 DOCUMENTS – QUICK ACCESS LINKS 30 PAM AWARDS 2020 33 MANAGEMENT AND FINANCIAL REMARKS 36 FINANCIAL REPORT 39 CALENDAR 2020 49 PRELIMINARY CALENDAR 2021 60 3 a v n a C © FOREWORD Hon. Karim Darwish President of PAM Dear Colleagues and friends, It has been a privilege and an honor to act as the President of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Mediterranean in 2020. As this year draws to a close, I would like to reiterate my deep gratitude to all PAM delegates and their National Parliaments, the PAM Secretariat and our partner organizations for their great work and unwavering support during a time when our region Honorable Karim Darwish, President of PAM and the world face a complex array of challenges.
    [Show full text]
  • Resilient Ukraine Resilient
    Resilient Ukraine: Safeguarding Society from Russian Aggression Russian from Society Ukraine: Safeguarding Resilient Research Paper Mathieu Boulègue and Orysia Lutsevych Ukraine Forum | June 2020 Resilient Ukraine Safeguarding Society from Russian Aggression Mathieu Boulègue and OrysiaLutsevych Chatham House Contents Summary 2 1 Introduction 3 2 The Impact of the Armed Conflict 13 3 Creating Resilience Dividends: Case Studies 27 4 Recommendations 33 5 Conclusion 37 About the Authors 38 Acknowledgments 39 1 | Chatham House Resilient Ukraine: Safeguarding Society from Russian Aggression Summary • Despite military conflict and an increasingly adversarial relationship with Russia, Ukraine has largely maintained its democratic reforms thanks to its resilience and determination to decide its own future. The country is gradually developing the capacity of its state institutions and civil society to address the political and social consequences of Russian aggression. • Russia’s three main levers of influence in Ukraine include the ongoing armed conflict, corruption, and the poor quality of the political sphere. The Kremlin seeks to exploit these vulnerabilities to promote polarization and encourage a clash between Ukraine’s citizens and its governing elite by taking military action, manipulating the corruption narrative, supporting pro-Russia parties, and fuelling religious tensions through the Russian Orthodox Church (ROC). • The ramifications of the military operation in Donbas reverberate strongly across the country and domestic politics. The most prominent spillover effects include the circulation of firearms and the weakened capacity of authorities to reintegrate internally displaced people (IDPs) and war veterans. • With no clear way to end the armed conflict, there is a growing risk of societal polarization. This could have negative consequences for any prospective peace agreement.
    [Show full text]
  • Reforms in Ukraine After Revolution of Dignity
    REFORMS IN UKRAINE AFTER REVOLUTION OF DIGNITY What was done, why not more and what to do next This publicaon was produced with financial Responsibility for the informaon and views set out assistance from the EBRD-Ukraine Stabilisaon and in this publicaon lies enrely with the authors. The Sustainable Growth Mul-Donor Account, the EBRD makes no representaon or warranty, express donors of which are Denmark, Finland, France, or implied, as to the accuracy or completeness of the Germany, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, Norway, informaon set forth in the publicaon. The EBRD Poland, Sweden, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, has not independently verified any of the informaon the United States of America and the European contained in the publicaon and the EBRD accepts Union, the largest donor. The views expressed herein no liability whatsoever for any of the informaon can in no way be taken to reflect the official opinion contained in the publicaon or for any misstatement of the EBRD or any donor of the account. or omission therein. The publicaon remains the property of the EBRD. REFORMS IN UKRAINE AFTER REVOLUTION OF DIGNITY What was done, why not more and what to do next Editors Ivan Miklos Pavlo Kukhta Contents Foreword 4 Introducon What was done, why not more and what to do next: Ukrainian reforms aer the Revoluon of Dignity 7 Chapter 1 Polical economy of reforms: polical system, governance and corrupon 10 Chapter 2 Macroeconomic policies 35 Chapter 3 Rule of law 48 Chapter 4 Energy policy 75 Chapter 5 Business environment 87 Chapter 6 Land reform 101 Chapter 7 Privasaon and SOE reform 112 Chapter 8 Healthcare reform 132 Chapter 9 Ukraine and the European Union 144 Annex 1 Report on reforms in 2016-17 162 Annex 2 The role of the government and MPs in reform implementaon in Ukraine 167 About SAGSUR (Strategic Advisory Group for Support of Ukrainian Reforms) 173 Glossary of terms 174 Foreword Foreword | 4 Foreword Maeo Patrone and Peter M.
    [Show full text]
  • Cleaning up the Energy Sector
    10 Cleaning Up the Energy Sector Victory is when we won’t buy any Russian gas. —Prime Minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk1 Ukraine’s energy sector is well endowed but extremely mismanaged. Since Ukraine’s independence, it has been the main source of top-level corruption, and its prime beneficiaries have bought the state. This long-lasting policy has undermined national security, caused unsustainable public costs, jeopardized the country’s balance of payments, led to massive waste of energy, and capped domestic production of energy. It is difficult to imagine a worse policy. In- stead, conditions should be created so that Ukraine can develop its substantial energy potential and become self-sufficient in coal and natural gas.2 The solution to these problems is no mystery and it has been elaborated in a large literature for the last two decades. To check corruption energy prices need to be unified. That means raising key prices four to five times, which will eliminate the large energy subsidies and stimulate energy saving, while also stimulating domestic production of all kinds of energy. To make this politi- cally possible, social compensation should be offered to the poorest half of the population. The energy sector suffers from many shortcomings, and most of these need to be dealt with swiftly. Otherwise, new rent-seeking interests will evolve, and soon they will become entrenched and once again impossible to defeat. The new government has a brief window of opportunity to address the most important issues. 1. “Ukraina osvoboditsya ot ‘gazovoi zavisimosti’ ot RF cherez 5 let—Yatsenyuk” [“Yatsenyuk: Ukraine Will Free Itself from Gas Dependence on Russia in 5 Years”], Ekonomichna pravda, Sep- tember 8, 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ukrainian Weekly, 2020
    INSIDE: l State in a Smartphone app is launched – page 3 l ‘Peripheral Visions’ exhibit by the Yurchuks – page 11 l Community: Alberta, New York, New Jersey – pages 16-17 THEPublished U by theKRAINIAN Ukrainian National Association, Inc., celebrating W its 125th anniversaryEEKLY Vol. LXXXVIII No. 7 THE UKRAINIAN WEEKLY SUNDAY, FEBRUARY 16, 2020 $2.00 NEWS ANALYSIS Yermak replaces Bohdan Zelenskyy, with Yermak in new role, as the head of Presidential Office emphasizes continuity in foreign policy by Bohdan Nahaylo understood that it is necessary to change the Minsk accords of 2014-2015 because KYIV – When President Volodymyr they are not working, and he sensed that Zelenskyy fired the controversial head of even “Russia is preparing to think this his Presidential Office, Andriy Bohdan, and over.” This recognition of “Minsk flexibility” replaced him with Andriy Yermak, a non- was a step forward. In his view, the staff close adviser who has become increas- achieve ment of peace remains the goal, for ingly influential in recent months, the move in the end it will be not about winners and suggested a change in style and approach in losers but “a victory for everyone.” the domestic sphere. But the appointment Turning from the Donbas to Crimea, also reaffirmed Mr. Yermak’s position as the President Zelenskyy acknowledged that Ukrainian president’s chief negotiator with this issue was “even more complicated.” He the Kremlin and his stewardship over added cryptically: “But we are also working Ukraine’s foreign policy in general. on it. I cannot say more so far.” On the same day as the personnel The following day, at his first press con- change in Kyiv, Moscow confirmed that ference as head of the Presidential Office, or Dmitry Kozak had replaced Vladyslav chief of staff, Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record—Senate S1184
    S1184 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE February 27, 2020 bomb components, repair and return of weap- get. Laser designation for the LGB can be ests above the interests of the United States. ons, weapons training equipment, practice provided by a variety of laser target markers The House Impeachment Managers have bombs, TTU–595 Test Set and spares, fin as- or designators. proven that the President’s abuse of power semblies, rocket motors, training aids/de- 4. Mk–82 General Purpose (GP) bomb is a and congressional obstruction amount to the vices/spare parts, aircraft spare parts, sup- 500 pound, free-fall, unguided, low-drag weap- constitutional standard of ‘‘high Crimes and port equipment, clothing and textiles, publi- on usually equipped with the mechanical Misdemeanors’’ for which the sole remedy is cations and technical documentation, travel M904 (nose) and M905 (tail) fuzes or the conviction and removal from office. expenses, medical services, construction, air- radar-proximity FMU–113 air-burst fuze. The II. STATEMENT OF THE FACTS craft ferry support, technical and logistical Mk–82 is designed for soft, fragment sen- On December 18, 2019, the United States support services, major modifications/class sitive targets and is not intended for hard House of Representatives passed H. Res. 755,1 IV support, personnel training and training targets or penetrations. The explosive filling ‘‘Impeaching Donald John Trump, President equipment, U.S. Government and contractor is usually tritonal, though other composi- of the United States, for high crimes and program support, and other related elements tions have sometimes been used. misdemeanors.’’ H. Res. 755 contains two Ar- of logistics and program support.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sondland-Volker Texts, Contextualized by Jeremy Venook
    Timeline: The Sondland-Volker Texts, Contextualized By Jeremy Venook After the administration blocked his initially scheduled appearance, U.S. Ambassador to the European Union Gordon Sondland is now reportedly set to testify before the House under subpoena. Prior to his appointment, Sondland, like President Donald Trump, was a hotel developer with no known foreign policy experience or expertise. Moreover, Ukraine is not a part of the European Union, which means it falls outside of his purview as ambassador to the EU. So why was Sondland such a key player in President Trump’s shadow Ukraine agenda? Text messages released by the House Intelligence, Oversight, and Foreign Affairs Committees show that Sondland, at times, personally directed other State Department officials in executing Trump’s extortion scheme, which sought a politically motivated investigation into former Vice President Joe Biden’s family. Sondland also appears to have been intimately involved in drafting a statement for Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky about the opening of that investigation to ensure it met the president’s standards. The text messages are damning in their own right and only become more so when viewed in the context of the president’s pressure campaign against Ukraine. The timeline below illustrates how the president circumvented the national security establishment to extort a foreign government for personal political gain—and that Sondland not only helped him do it but also helped him try to cover it up. NOTE: Messages released by the House appear below in normal font. Commentary on those texts appear in bold. Significant outside events appear in red.
    [Show full text]
  • Ukraine's New Gas Chief Says He Is 'True Reformer' After Backlash Over His Appointment
    Received by NSD/FARA Registration Unit 06/24/2021 6:14:10 PM v RadioFreeEurope f RadioLiberty UKRAINE Ukraine's New Gas Chief Says He Is 'True Reformer' After Backlash Over His Appointment June 10, 202117:03 GMT By Todd Prince Received by NSD/FARA Registration Unit 06/24/2021 6:14:10 PM Received by NSD/FARA Registration Unit 06/24/2021 6:14:10 PM The new chief executive officer of Ukraine's state-owned gas behemoth has said he is committed to pushing reforms at the company after a recent management change sparked Western concerns about transparency. Yuriy Vitrenko, who was named CEO of Naftogaz in late April, told RFE/RL on June 9 that he was behind many of the company's reform initiatives since 2014. Vitrenko's comments came following a day of meetings in Washington with officials from the State Department and Energy Department, among others, and a day before addressing U.S. energy industry investors. Ukraine's Cabinet of Ministers, of which Vitrenko was a member in his capacity as acting energy minister, came under harsh criticism after it temporarily dismissed the supervisory board of Naftogaz on April 28 in order to fire longtime CEO Andriy Kobolyev. The body then appointed Vitrenko to replace Kobolyev. The United States, which has pushed reforms of the once notoriously corrupt company for years and viewed Kobolyev's efforts positively, sharply criticized the decision as "calculated." Vitrenko said that Washington reacted as it did because of existing concerns over Ukraine's reform agenda and because Naftogaz had emerged as a "symbol" of the nation's reform progress.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ukrainian Weekly 2012, No.37
    www.ukrweekly.com INSIDE: l Exclusive interview with Bishop Borys Gudziak – page 3 l Ukraine’s achievements at the Paralympic Games – page 9 l Communities celebrate Ukraine’s Independence Day – page 11 THEPublished U by theKRAINIAN Ukrainian National Association Inc., a fraternal W non-profit associationEEKLY Vol. LXXX No. 37 THE UKRAINIAN WEEKLY SUNDAY, SEPTEMBER 9, 2012 $1/$2 in Ukraine Journalists protest Stryiskyi Park Collegium censorship in Ukraine PARSIPPANY, N.J. – President Viktor Yanukovych’s on UCU campus is blessed September 3 speech to the World Newspaper Congress convening in Kyiv was interrupted by about a dozen journalists protesting media censorship in Ukraine. Mr. Yanukovych did not react as the journalists rose from their seats and held up signs reading “Stop cen- sorship” and “Media oligarchs serve the authorities,” but security guards violently ripped the signs out of the hands of some protesters. In his speech, Mr. Yanukovych vowed to uphold democratic principles and media freedoms, stating, “The main task of the government in the media sphere, as I have set it, is to create conditions when free press can develop freely and be independent of any kind of control.” Mr. Yanukovych called on journalists “to maintain a high level of ethical standards and uphold the princi- ples of being objective and politically biased.” He Zenon Zawada apparently meant to say the opposite: unbiased. The Stryiskyi Park Collegium of the Ukrainian Catholic University will consist of a residential wing (left), already According to a report by the Associated Press, in completed, and the academic portion, to be completed by next year.
    [Show full text]
  • Results of the 133Rd Assembly and Related
    TABLE OF CONTENTS Page(s) Meetings and other activities 133rd Assembly 1. Opening of the Assembly .................................................................................................... 4 2. Participation ......................................................................................................................... 4 3. Choice of an emergency item .............................................................................................. 5 4. Debates and decisions of the Assembly and its Standing Committees .............................. 6 5. Concluding sitting ................................................................................................................ 12 197th session of the Governing Council 1. Membership and Permanent Observers of the IPU ............................................................ 12 2. Financial situation of the IPU ............................................................................................... 13 3. Programme and budget for 2016 ........................................................................................ 13 4. Cooperation with the United Nations system ...................................................................... 13 5. Implementation of the IPU Strategy for 2012-2017 ............................................................. 14 6. Recent specialized meetings ............................................................................................... 15 7. Reports of plenary bodies and specialized committees .....................................................
    [Show full text]