DOCSLIB.ORG

Who's Who in Transaction-Processing Monitors, 4Q05

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Who's Who in Transaction-Processing Monitors, 4Q05 Research Publication Date: 2 February 2006 ID Number: G00137650 Who's Who in Transaction-Processing Monitors, 4Q05 Massimo Pezzini, Yefim V. Natis This report gives details of five vendors of transaction-processing monitor products. It also offers advice on when to consider buying each vendor's product. © 2006 Gartner, Inc. and/or its Affiliates. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of this publication in any form without prior written permission is forbidden. The information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable. Gartner disclaims all warranties as to the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of such information. Although Gartner's research may discuss legal issues related to the information technology business, Gartner does not provide legal advice or services and its research should not be construed or used as such. Gartner shall have no liability for errors, omissions or inadequacies in the information contained herein or for interpretations thereof. The opinions expressed herein are subject to change without notice. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Overview...................................................................................................................................... 3 2.0 Vendors ....................................................................................................................................... 3 2.1 BEA Systems.................................................................................................................. 3 2.2 IBM ................................................................................................................................. 4 2.2.1 CICS TS ......................................................................................................... 4 2.2.2 IMS TM ........................................................................................................... 5 2.2.3 TXSeries......................................................................................................... 5 2.2.4 z/TPF .............................................................................................................. 5 2.3 Micro Focus International ............................................................................................... 6 2.4 Sun Microsystems .......................................................................................................... 7 2.5 Tmax Soft ....................................................................................................................... 7 3.0 Bottom Line.................................................................................................................................. 8 Publication Date: 2 February 2006/ID Number: G00137650 Page 2 of 10 © 2006 Gartner, Inc. and/or its Affiliates. All Rights Reserved. ANALYSIS 1.0 Overview For more than 30 years, transaction-processing monitor (TPM) products have been the platforms of choice for supporting online transaction-processing applications. Born on proprietary mainframe platforms, TPM technology was later made available on Unix and then Windows and Linux platforms in the form of mainframe TPM-compatible products (such as IBM’s TXSeries) and products specifically designed to run on distributed, nonmainframe boxes (such as BEA Systems’ BEA Tuxedo). Although TPMs are declining in popularity, they still run the business of thousands of companies worldwide. Increasingly, enterprises designing new high-end, business-critical, transactional applications look at popular enterprise application servers based on the Java 2 Platform, Enterprise Edition (J2EE) set of standards and the Microsoft application server platform, commonly referred to as .NET, because these platforms have significantly closed the quality-of- service (QOS) gap with TPMs. Leading-edge organizations with extreme requirements are also looking at innovative grid-based or event-driven application servers that aim at providing ultrahigh-end performance, scalability, reliability and availability on commodity Linux or Windows boxes. TPMs still have a vast installed base, proven enterprise-class QOS and rock-solid reliability. The most popular TPMs are still viable platforms that continue to evolve in terms of manageability, QOS and support for technologies such as Java, XML, Web services and event processing. Many TPM users will continue to use these platforms during the next five years to run their business- critical applications, although they will increasingly look at more-recent platforms for new developments. In some cases, they will try to reduce the cost of running TPM applications on mainframes by migrating them to mainframe-TPM-compatible products running on Linux, Unix or Windows boxes. Examples of these are Fujitsu's NeoKicks, High Technology World Company's XFrame, IBM's TXSeries, Micro Focus' Micro Focus Server Enterprise Edition, Rosebud Management Systems' Eden Server, Sun Microsystems' Mainframe Transaction Processing and Mainframe Batch Manager, and Tmax Soft's OpenFrame. 2.0 Vendors 2.1 BEA Systems San Jose, California www.bea.com Analysis by Yefim Natis (December 2005) BEA Tuxedo is the dominant online transaction processing (OLTP) monitor for distributed systems. AT&T Labs originally designed the product in the late 1980s. Tuxedo was a visionary product for its time, offering, in the 1990's, support for service-oriented architecture, a precursor of a messaging-based enterprise service bus transport, and a precursor of XML. Its scalability and availability still remain the highest available for Unix and Windows platforms. Approximately 2,000 enterprises depend on Tuxedo for their mission-critical applications. Tuxedo supports C, C++ and COBOL programming (not Java); it uses X/Open XATMI or a less-used implementation of a Common Object Request Broker Architecture (CORBA) programming model. BEA Systems has not invested strategically in modernizing Tuxedo in recent years; still, it was Publication Date: 2 February 2006/ID Number: G00137650 Page 3 of 10 © 2006 Gartner, Inc. and/or its Affiliates. All Rights Reserved. upgraded to support XML and Web services access. Further modernizations and use of Tuxedo technology are expected in the future as BEA Systems is experiencing some renewed interest in Tuxedo in Asia/Pacific markets. Consider BEA Tuxedo when developing high-end distributed business applications using C or COBOL programming. 2.2 IBM Armonk, New York www.ibm.com Analysis by Massimo Pezzini (December 2005) IBM is the dominant vendor of traditional TPMs. Although the installed base of these products is not growing, and possibly eroding at the low end, TPMs are a healthy (about $1 billion in new license revenue in 2004), profitable and growing business for IBM. The daily workload supported by these products is constantly growing, although the number of new applications is relatively small. Among TPM vendors, IBM is the most dedicated to "breathing new life" into its glorious, although aged, TPM platforms, investing more in the products than what is needed to slow down installed- base erosion. IBM's TPMs have gradually absorbed new "Internet-oriented" technologies, such as XML, HTML/HTTP, Java and Web services. Users are still actively extending their IBM TPM- based applications, frequently taking advantage of hybrid architectures that combine J2EE or .NET as front ends and TPMs as back ends to support modern transaction-processing requirements. Although J2EE or .NET has yet to prove to be as dependable as IBM's TPMs, these newer platforms are gradually invading IBM TPMs' vital space and confining them to mainly supporting the most demanding, ultrahigh-end transactional applications. Despite IBM's rejuvenation efforts, its TPMs will continue to be unattractive in comparison with less-proven but more-popular alternatives. This is because of the TPMs' extremely high cost of entry in terms of hardware, software and skills building — a major concern for IBM TPM users, because skills are forecast to become increasingly rare (and, therefore, expensive) during the next five to 10 years. As a result, IBM's TPMs will be confined to their current installed base and will not gain a significant number of new clients, despite their superior maturity and enterprise readiness. 2.2.1 CICS TS Customer Information Control System (CICS) Transaction Server (TS) is IBM's flagship OLTP application platform and the market-dominating enterprise-class application environment since the 1970s. Because of its deep integration with the underlying z/OS (and DOS/VSE) operating system and zSeries mainframe hardware architecture, CICS TS remains one of the most scalable, secure and highly available application environments on the market. CICS TS has a large — albeit slowly shrinking — installed base of about 6,000 enterprises and supports mission- critical business applications with tens of thousands of concurrent users and tens of millions of transactions per day. Since the late 1990s, IBM has been constantly modernizing CICS programming through the addition of support for Java, Enterprise JavaBeans 1.1 Session Beans, Java Database Connectivity (JDBC), Remote Method Invocation (RMI)/Internet Inter-ORB Protocol (IIOP), and Java Naming and Directory Interface (JNDI). IBM also introduced an XML parsing capability, a wide range of connectivity options, including HTTP, the J2EE Connector Architecture (JCA)- compliant CICS Transaction Gateway and Simple Object Access Protocol (SOAP) support. IBM Publication Date: 2 February 2006/ID Number: G00137650 Page 4 of 10 © 2006
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ICL Technical Journal Volume 8 Issue 3
    ICL TECHNICAL JOURNAL Volume 8 Issue 3 May 1993 Published by International Computers Limited at Oxford University Press TECHNICAL JOURNAL The ICL Technical Journal is published twice a year by International Com­ puters Limited at Oxford University Press. Editor J.M.M. Pinkerton ICL, Lovelace Road, Bracknell, Berks RG12 4SN Editorial Board J.M.M. Pinkerton (Editor) M.R. Miller (BT Laboratories) P.J. Cropper W. O’Riordan (Northern Telecom Europe) A. Rowley D.W. Davies FRS D. Overkleeft (Holland) G.E. Felton E.C.P. Portman P. Galais (Symbol, France) D. Thomelin (ICL France) M.D. Godfrey T. Uehara (Fujitsu) (Stanford University) B.C. Warboys (University J. Howlett of Manchester) M.H. Kay H.J. Winterbotham F.F. Land (BNR Europe Ltd) All correspondence and papers to be considered for publication should be addressed to the Editor. The views expressed in the papers are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent ICL policy. 1993 subscription rates: annual subscription £60 UK and Europe and $120 rest of world; single issues £36 UK and Europe and $72 rest of world. Orders with remittances should be sent to the Journals Subscriptions Department, Oxford University Press, Walton Street, Oxford 0X2 6DP. This publication is copyright under the Berne Convention and the Inter­ national Copyright Convention. All rights reserved. Apart from any copying under the UK Copyright Act 1956, part 1, section 7, whereby a single copy of an article may be supplied, under certain conditions, for the purposes of research or private study, by a library of a class prescribed by the UK Board of Trade Regulations (Statutory Instruments 1957, No.
    [Show full text]
  • レガシーシステムからクラウドネイティブ・JAVA化への ハイブリッドアプローチのご紹介！ 目標はlegacyのai Transformation
    Over the レガシーシステムからクラウドネイティブ・JAVA化への ハイブリッドアプローチのご紹介！ 目標はLegacyのAI Transformation 2021.04.22 16:00-16:30 日本ティーマックスソフト株式会社 副社長・製品＆ソリューション最高責任者 羅 鍾弼 ( [email protected] ) 目次 I. はじめに（弊社TmaxSoftのご案内） II. レガシーシステムの課題 III.レガシーマイグレーション: リアーキテクチャ （OpenFrame21） IV. DX化の実現のための最適なビジネスモデル I. はじめに（弊社TmaxSoftのご案内） TmaxSoftについて 他社にはない迅速で広範な製品提供力を持つ、クラウド・ AIコラボレーションソリューションのグローバル・プロバイダーです。 ◆ TmaxSoftは、韓国科学技術院（KAIST）教授であった朴 大演（パク・デヨン）によって1997年に設立 ◆ データベース、ミドルウェア、フレームワーク・ソフトウェアを中心に 研究開発されたソリューションを提供 ◆ IT大国となった韓国において、ミドルウェア市場の4割超のシェ アを獲得しているトップ・プレーヤー ◆ 全従業員のうちエンジニアの割合が7割を占める技術オリエン テッドな企業であり、韓国及び海外の主要大学の電算系出身 の修士/博士級の優秀な研究開発者が結集 ◆ 激変するビジネスの世界で、クラウド・AIコラボレーションのソ リューション提供に技術力を集中 米国シカゴのグローバル本社、韓国ソウルのグループ本社を含め、現在、世界18か国に拠 点をおき、約2000名の社員でビジネスを展開しています。 成長の道 グローバル独占との競争における比類のない成果 韓国における Webアプリケーションサーバー 43.8% の市場シェアの変遷 Hits top 市場競争力を構築 for first time →顧客のソフトウェア選択肢拡大 29.8% BEA社買収 高品質のソフトウェア開発 19.6% →顧客が競争優位性獲得 6.8% Others 優秀なR＆Dエンジニアの採用 →良い仕事とIT人材の創出 2000 2003 2006 2009 2012 2015 [Source: IDC Korea, 2000-2018] 製品ポートフォリオ エンタープライズシステムのミドルウェアから最新のAIコラボレーション技術を 中心とした製品ラインナップを提供 ｜ビジネスプラットフォーム + コラボレーション・コミュニケーション・プラットフォーム + インフラ｜ II. レガシーシステムの課題 メインフレームの維持によるリスク （DXレポート） 1. 継続される高額なIT予算 3. システムの老朽化 30～40年前に作成されたアプリケーションに対するノウハウがなく、現世代 「IT予算の8割がシステム維持管理」が依然続き、 では手が付けられない状態。 沈みゆく日本のITユーザー（IT Leaders 2019/６/6) 4. システムの肥大化 事業拡大に伴い、その中心を担ってきたメインフレームに膨大なアプリケー ション資産が集中。 5. アプリケーションがスパゲッティ 様々な工夫を盛り込んだメインフレームアプリケーションは、複雑な構成とな （出典：JUAS「企業IT動向調査」の2013～2018年度結果を基に作成） り、ひも解くことが困難になってきた。 2. レガシー環境を支えるIT人材不足 6. ベンダーロックイン IT人材が不足する中、レガシーシステムの保守・運用にIT・ インフラ管理技術の専任化。ベンダー固有のS/Wや周辺機器しか選択で
    [Show full text]
  • Mainframe Services & Solutions
    Mainframe Services & Solutions A research report U.S. 2021 comparing provider strengths, challenges and competitive differentiators Quadrant Report Customized report courtesy of: April 2021 ISG Provider Lens™ Quadrant Report | April 2021 Section Name About this Report Information Services Group Inc. is solely responsible for the content of this report. ISG Provider Lens™ delivers leading-edge and actionable research studies, reports Unless otherwise cited, all content, including illustrations, research, conclusions, and consulting services focused on technology and service providers’ strengths and assertions and positions contained in this report were developed by, and are the sole weaknesses and how they are positioned relative to their peers in the market. These property of Information Services Group Inc. reports provide influential insights accessed by our large pool of advisors who are actively advising outsourcing deals as well as large numbers of ISG enterprise clients The research and analysis presented in this report includes research from the ISG who are potential outsourcers. Provider Lens™ program, ongoing ISG Research programs, interviews with ISG advisors, briefings with services providers, and analysis of publicly available market information For more information about our studies, please email [email protected], from multiple sources. The data collected for this report represents information that call +49 (0) 561-50697537, or visit ISG Provider Lens™ under ISG Provider Lens™. ISG believes to be current as of February 2021, for providers who actively participated as well as for providers who did not. ISG recognizes that many mergers and acquisitions have taken place since that time, but those changes are not reflected in this report.
    [Show full text]
  • CASE STUDY GE CAPITAL ASSESSING, CONVERTING, & REPLATFORMING a MASSIVE BUSINESS CRITICAL APPLICATION with ASTONISHING RESULTS Introduction
    CASE STUDY GE CAPITAL ASSESSING, CONVERTING, & REPLATFORMING A MASSIVE BUSINESS CRITICAL APPLICATION WITH ASTONISHING RESULTS Introduction GE Capital is the financial services unit of the American conglomerate General Electric, it provides commercial lending and leasing, as well as a range of financial services for consumers. Most of GE Capital’s commercial loans are to small and midsized companies, spread across multiple industries and geographies, and secured by tangible assets. GE Capital’s consumer lending activities are also diversified by product and geography and include operations in 55 countries. Project Summary GE Capital was looking to move their PMS suite of $ 2014 Net Income: $7.0 billion applications from ADS/O and COBOL/IDMS running 2014 Assets: $499 billion on a mainframe, to COBOL running with Oracle on Unix without changing the user interface in the Operations in 40+ Countries process. PMS was built by GE Capital in 1987 500,000+ Commercial Customers and began its life as a 20,000 account schedule system without any interfaces. 35,000+ Employees As with most homegrown systems, it was built out of necessity and to serve the business as it existed at the time. Over the decades, this small system grew in size and complexity to become the central nervous system of both GE Capital’s direct and indirect business units comprised of four highly customized implementations. With over 5 million account schedules, 382 interfaces, 1,700 concurrent users, and 3.5 million transactions per day running against 71 million lines of code, the PMS system had come a long way from its humble roots.
    [Show full text]
  • Re-Hosting Service Deck Driving Business Growth by Creating New Opportunities for Our Customers Contents
    Legacy Re-hosting Service Deck Driving Business growth by creating new Opportunities for our Customers Contents Syntel & LMCoE Service Service Case Profile Overview Methodology Studies 2 Syntel Overview Small Enough to Listen, Big Enough to DeliverTM • Revenue Differentiators $911.4 M (2014) $235.3 M (Q4 2014) - DNA : Delivery & operational excellence • Revenue Growth - Philosophy 12% (Y-o-Y) : 'Customer For Life' • Market Cap - Culture ~$4.2 Billion : Entrepreneurial with 5 core values - Mindset • Headcount : Investment; ahead of the curve in 24,553 new technologies & automation • Headquarters Troy, Michigan (Founded 1980) World-Class Infrastructure Pune, India Chennai, India Mumbai, India (77-acres campus, Capacity:7000+) (27-acres campus, Capacity:5000+) (8.05-acres, Capacity:4000+) Ranked among the top performing 344 public companies by Harvard Business Review 100 Best Small Companies (#20, 2013) NMSDC Certified MBE 3 Integrated Transformation – M-III Migrate Manage Modernize Unified Service StayAhead Future State Syntel IPs & Outcome Catalogue Roadmap Architecture Platform aligned Pricing Services Tools & Accelerators Benefits . Support and Development (Incident, User . IDENTEON, IntelliTransfer & . Quick wins & early cost request Mgmt., Change & Release Mgmt., KARP recovery Preventive Maintenance, Prod Assurance, . Agile for Dev & Support . Continuous Optimizations CBEAT, CCAT and MACH Performance tuning , Product life cycle Mgmt. …) . Performance based pricing . Portfolio Rationalization . Migrations / Consolidation (Virtualization,
    [Show full text]
  • Openframe Faqs
    OpenFrame FAQs OpenFrame is a complete mainframe rehosting solution that lets you take (lift) your existing mainframe assets and move (shift) them to an open system platform, quickly and with minimal risk. This helps your business save on costly mainframe contracts and more effectively leverage critical data, while gaining a more flexible and transparent environment. What is rehosting? What happens to my JCL? Rehosting is a way to preserve valuable JCL is migrated as is into the OpenFrame application business logic that is stuck on environment, no changes are required. proprietary hardware such as mainframes and software by moving it to an open system, Does OpenFrame support third party public or private cloud environment. applications? OpenFrame recompiles the original source What languages does OpenFrame support? code. In many cases, third party vendors are OpenFrame has native support for COBOL, reluctant to share their original source code PL/I, Assembler, JCL, Shell Scripts, Easytrieve which can be an impediment. However, many Plus, and more. third party applications, including schedulers, often have Linux versions / open systems What cloud vendors do you work with? applications available that can integrate with AWS, Microsoft Azure and Google Cloud. We OpenFrame. also have a private cloud solution optimized on Dell EMC. Does OpenFrame support DB2? Yes, but after the migration you would move to Does OpenFrame work with VMware and DB2 LUW or another RDBMS of your choice. Docker? Yes, OpenFrame can exist in a virtual Does OpenFrame support major online environment and/or in a container. subsystems IDMS-DC, IMS-DC and CICS? Yes, OpenFrame supports these online What operating systems does OpenFrame subsystems natively.
    [Show full text]
  • ISG Providerlens™ Quadrant Report
    Mainframe Services & Solutions A research report U.S. 2021 comparing provider strengths, challenges and competitive differentiators Quadrant Report Customized report courtesy of: March 2021 ISG Provider Lens™ Quadrant Report | March 2021 Section Name About this Report Information Services Group Inc. is solely responsible for the content of this report. ISG Provider Lens™ delivers leading-edge and actionable research studies, reports Unless otherwise cited, all content, including illustrations, research, conclusions, and consulting services focused on technology and service providers’ strengths and assertions and positions contained in this report were developed by, and are the sole weaknesses and how they are positioned relative to their peers in the market. These property of Information Services Group Inc. reports provide influential insights accessed by our large pool of advisors who are actively advising outsourcing deals as well as large numbers of ISG enterprise clients The research and analysis presented in this report includes research from the ISG who are potential outsourcers. Provider Lens™ program, ongoing ISG Research programs, interviews with ISG advisors, briefings with services providers, and analysis of publicly available market information For more information about our studies, please email [email protected], from multiple sources. The data collected for this report represents information that call +49 (0) 561-50697537, or visit ISG Provider Lens™ under ISG Provider Lens™. ISG believes to be current as of February 2021, for providers who actively participated as well as for providers who did not. ISG recognizes that many mergers and acquisitions have taken place since that time, but those changes are not reflected in this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Mainframe Modernization: What Are My Choices?
    e BOOK Mainframe modernization: What are my choices? Choosing the best legacy modernization option for your organization For decades, most large-scale companies have used mainframes to host and run the software applications that make up their legacy systems. Indeed, most enterprise-level systems in operation today reside within mainframe machines, while COBOL applications (the primary language used with mainframes) continue to handle the vast majority of modern enterprise-level computer transactions. But analysts today emphasize that CIOs need to speed up legacy modernization in their organizations for many reasons, not least of which are remaining competitive and being able to respond quickly to market threats and opportunities. Industry analysts recommend that IT directors take inventory of their portfolio of existing systems in order to divide them into three categories. This exercise can help IT focus on improving its digital business focus: Systems of record Systems of differentiation Systems of innovation These can be purchased as packaged systems Typically, these are internally developed These systems provide true company value or internally developed, and typically they and provide some level of distinction from and often its Intellectual Property. This is do little to company competitiveness. An the competition. An example might be an where innovation needs to be focused and example might be back office accounting. improved customer interface and experience. budgets spent. An example can be a risk rating system for insurance companies. The next step is to look at the percentage of budget each category currently absorbs. If too much is being spent on Systems of Record (typically mainframe applications), and not enough is being spent on Systems of Innovation, your competitors are probably closing in.
    [Show full text]
  • Oracle Database 10G如何作为现代化基础?
    <Insert Picture Here> Oracle 10g Grid: 现代化基础 Manish Jain Director, Platform Technologies 议程 • 什么是现代化和为什么要现代化? • 什么是现代化方法? 好处和不利? • Oracle Database 10g如何作为现代化基础? • 专题研究 – Samsung Life Insurance • 最大的现代化例子 • Oracle的现代化 – 我们能怎么帮助 Oracle Disclaimer "The following is intended to outline our general product direction. It is intended for information purposes only, and may not be incorporated into any contract. It is not a commitment to deliver any material, code, or functionality, and should not be relied upon in making purchasing decision. The development, release, and timing of any features or functionality described for Oracle's products remains at the sole discretion of Oracle." IT现代化 保存遗留应用企业内容同时适应现代技术 环境 扩大您现有应用的ROI IT现代化企业目标 • 减少归属的总成本 • 改进整体商业结果 • 增长收支、收入和现金流动 • 减少作业成本 • 增加企业敏捷性 • 增加能力迅速处理改变的企业需要 • 顾及新兴市场 • 使对遗产技术的依赖减到最小 • 问HR何时这将是问题 • 改进法规服从 • 增长相当数量的处理自动化 看看分析员说什么 • “我们相信中等计算机主机(medium mainframe)是一个危险的种类。我们 盼望计算机主机的数量在微小和小类别极五年以后将大下降。"– Ovum • “直到2010年前, 80% 更小的计算机主机环境将移居至其他平台, 大环境将 是SOA 使能并且将依然在这个平台"– Gartner • “没人在学校再学[ Cobol ] , 并且新应用不再被用 Cobol建立,”….. “Cobol is like Latin.” - Zapthink ComputerWorld April 2006 不是一个容易的问题 Top Secret ADSO TCP APPC Natural RACF LU6.2 CSP Z/OS 30 30 I I L M L M Years Years E E S COBOL S IMS/DB DB2 PL/I CICS Assembler ISAM/VSAM CA/7 JES ISPF OPC 3270 Outsourced, Supplier, and Customer Data Centers s Digital Citie InternetInternet 环境 s Digital vice IT Home Ser rs Providers s ce Mobile Consume 现代化 Digital Offi ry / e ors Enterprise ens Factohous S Ware e Digital Offic r Data and Database Grid Cente User
    [Show full text]
  • Devops Paradox
    DevOps Paradox The truth about DevOps by the people on the front line Viktor Farcic BIRMINGHAM - MUMBAI DevOps Paradox Copyright © 2019 Packt Publishing All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the publisher, except in the case of brief quotations embedded in critical articles or reviews. Every effort has been made in the preparation of this book to ensure the accuracy of the information presented. However, the information contained in this book is sold without warranty, either express or implied. Neither the author, nor Packt Publishing or its dealers and distributors, will be held liable for any damages caused or alleged to have been caused directly or indirectly by this book. Packt Publishing has endeavored to provide trademark information about all of the companies and products mentioned in this book by the appropriate use of capitals. However, Packt Publishing cannot guaran- tee the accuracy of this information. Acquisition Editors: Dominic Shakeshaft, Jonathan Malysiak Project Editor: Kishor Rit Development Editor: Alex Sorrentino Technical Editor: Saby D’silva Copy Editor: Safis Editing Proofreader: Safis Editing Indexer: Pratik Shirodkar Production Coordinator: Sandip Tadge First published: August 2019 Production reference: 1290819 Published by Packt Publishing Ltd. Livery Place 35 Livery Street Birmingham B3 2PB, UK. ISBN 978-1-78913-363-9 www.packt.com Contents Introduction ������������������������������������������������������������������������
    [Show full text]
  • A TCS Perspective on Mainframe Re-Hosting About the Authors
    Alliance and Technology Unit White Paper A TCS Perspective on Mainframe Re-hosting About the Authors Ajay Gupta Ajay is an Enterprise Architect with the Alliance and Technology unit at TCS. He has been in the IT industry for over 18 years. He has worked on application development, maintenance, and database migration initiatives on mainframes, as well as application migration off mainframes. Since 2007, he has been working extensively on IBM mainframe re-hosting. His responsibilities include legacy landscape assessment, target architecture definition, capacity planning, business case preparation, migration planning, and project delivery support. He has a Bachelor’s degree in Electronics and Communication Engineering from Pondicherry University. Sujeet Babu Sujeet is a Solution Architect with the Alliance and Technology unit at TCS. He has been in the IT industry for over 16 years, and has worked extensively in mainframe-based application development and maintenance projects for customers in North America, Europe, and the UK. For the last six years, he has specialized in helping TCS customers with their legacy modernization initiatives, particularly related to IBM mainframe re- hosting. Sujeet holds certifications in DB2, SOA, ITIL, Six Sigma, Enterprise Architecture (TOGAF ), Agile (IBM RUP), and General Insurance (from the Chartered Insurance Institute, UK). He has a Bachelor’s degree in Electrical and Electronics Engineering from Bangalore University. Abstract Mainframes form the backbone of many core business processes in organizations worldwide. However, the total cost of ownership, platform flexibility, and administration and programming skills associated with them have been critical areas of concern in recent times. Banking solely on unsupported legacy systems might not just create reliability and performance issues, it could also lead to more revenue leakage due to the high cost of maintenance.
    [Show full text]
  • Programming Guide
    Ingres OpenROAD® 2006 Programming Guide OR-2006-PR-02 This documentation and related computer software program (hereinafter referred to as the "Documentation") is for the end user's informational purposes only and is subject to change or withdrawal by Ingres Corporation ("Ingres") at any time. This Documentation may not be copied, transferred, reproduced, disclosed or duplicated, in whole or in part, without the prior written consent of Ingres. This Documentation is proprietary information of Ingres and protected by the copyright laws of the United States and international treaties. Notwithstanding the foregoing, licensed users may print a reasonable number of copies of this Documentation for their own internal use, provided that all Ingres copyright notices and legends are affixed to each reproduced copy. Only authorized employees, consultants, or agents of the user who are bound by the confidentiality provisions of the license for the software are permitted to have access to such copies. This right to print copies is limited to the period during which the license for the product remains in full force and effect. The user consents to Ingres obtaining injunctive relief precluding any unauthorized use of the Documentation. Should the license terminate for any reason, it shall be the user's responsibility to return to Ingres the reproduced copies or to certify to Ingres that same have been destroyed. To the extent permitted by applicable law, INGRES PROVIDES THIS DOCUMENTATION "AS IS" WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT WILL INGRES BE LIABLE TO THE END USER OR ANY THIRD PARTY FOR ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE, DIRECT OR INDIRECT, FROM THE USER OF THIS DOCUMENTATION, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, LOST PROFITS, BUSINESS INTERRUPTION, GOODWILL, OR LOST DATA, EVEN IF INGRES IS EXPRESSLY ADVISED OF SUCH LOSS OR DAMAGE.
    [Show full text]