Amplitude Modulation May Be Confused with Infrasound

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Amplitude Modulation May Be Confused with Infrasound ACTA ACUSTICA UNITED WITH ACUSTICA Vol. 104 (2018) 825 –829 DOI 10.3813/AAA.919232 Amplitude Modulation MayBeConfused with Infrasound Torsten Marquardt1),Carlos Jurado2) 1) UCL Ear Institute, University College London, 332 Gray’sInn Road, London, WC1X8EE, United Kingdom. [email protected] 2) Escuela de Ingeniería en Sonido yAcústica, Universidad de Las Américas, Avenue Granados and Colimes, Quito EC170125, Ecuador Summary Environmental infrasound is usually accompanied by low-frequency(LF)sounds. Considering that inner hair cell transduction equals half-waverectification, activity of low-frequencyauditory nervefibres may be indistin- guishable whether elicited by LF sound that is amplitude-modulated at an infrasonic rate, or LF sound that is superimposed onto infrasound that “biases” the basilar membrane position. We tested whether listeners are able to distinguish a63-Hz carrier tone, amplitude modulated at 8Hz, from a63-Hz pure tone that wasperceptu- ally loudness-modulated by an 8-Hz biasing tone. Using amaximum-likelihood procedure, 12 participants first adjusted the intensity of the 8-Hz tone so that the perceivedmodulation of the pure tone matched areference amplitude-modulated tone. Both stimuli types were then presented in random order,and participants had to iden- tify presentations which contained the infrasound tone. About half the participants performed close to chance. The best had 81% correct. Experiments with a125-Hz carrier tone gave similar results. Although performance may improve in a2-interval discrimination task, this would not be representative of real listening conditions. Results suggest that slowly amplitude-modulated LF sounds may underlie complaints about environmental infrasound, where measured infrasound levels are well belowsensation threshold. ©2018 The Author(s).Published by S. Hirzel Verlag · EAA. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CCBY4.0)license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). PACS no. 43.66.-x 1. Introduction stimulus types under consideration. Because the inner hair cell releases neuro transmitter only during basilar mem- Noise spectra assessed in response to complaints about en- brane (BM) movement towards scala vestibuli, signals be- vironmental infrasound most often reveal that the sound come effectively half-waverectified. In order to illustrate pressures of spectral components in the infrasound range this operation, the lower parts of the signals that are not (< 20 Hz)are well belowsensation threshold and there- coded by the AN are greyed out in the figure. Comparison fore should be inaudible to human listeners (e.g. [1]). of the remaining upper parts shows schematically that the Commonly,such finding closes the complaint case. The spiking probabilities of the AN fibres in response to those measured spectra, however, often cross the auditory sen- twostimuli are almost identical. sation threshold somewhere between 20 Hz and 100 Hz. Of course, this scenario is givenonly if the stimulus These supra-threshold low-frequencynoise components components are not spectrally resolved by the cochlea. might have pronounced envelope fluctuations with spectral This might easily be the case at its very apical end be- content well below20Hz, which might be easily mistaken cause the lowest auditory filters have relatively wide spec- as containing supra-threshold infrasound. tral tuning and more importantly,the lowest stimulus fre- Using simple sinusoidal stimuli, we tested under lab- quencythat has acharacteristic place on the human BM is oratory conditions whether listeners can actually distin- assumed to be as high as 50 Hz (see reviewing remarks in guish between stimuli mixes that contain true infrasound [2, pages 51–52]), if not even 80 Hz [3]. In other words, all and stimuli that are amplitude-modulated (AM) at an in- frequencycomponents lower than this share the very api- frasonic rate, i.e. do not actually contain frequencycom- cal end of the BM as their characteristic place (the place of ponents below20Hz. This might well not be the case if maximum vibration amplitude). The condition illustrated one considers the similarity in auditory nerve(AN)output in Figure 1istherefore not unlikely,and our test results that these twostimuli produce. Figure 1illustrates the two showthat listeners have indeed great difficulty in distin- guishing these twotypes of stimuli with carrier tones of Received9March 2018, 63 Hz and even 125 Hz. accepted 9September 2018. ©2018 The Author(s). Published by S. Hirzel Verlag · EAA. This is an open access article under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 license. 825 ACTA ACUSTICA UNITED WITH ACUSTICA Marquardt, Jurado: Amplitude modulation confusion Vol. 104 (2018) 2. Methods 2.1. Instrumentation The infrasound source used in this study is identical to that used by Kuehler et al. [4]: From ahermetically en- closed electrodynamic loudspeaker,an8-Hz biasing tone wastransmitted via an 8-m long polyethylene tube to the listener’sear.(It wasoriginally developed to be used in MEG and fMRI experiments.)For the last 40 cm, the 14 mm inner diameter of this tube wasreduced via acoupling into amore flexible tube with 2.5 mm inner diameter that took at its end an audiometric ear tip (ER3-14A, Etymotic Research)that washermetically fitted in the listener’sear canal. Before, in-between and after all psychometric mea- surements, the fitting wastested by measuring the SPL in situ with aminiature microphone (Knowles FG-23453) Figure 1. The twostimulus types considered in this study: abi- that wascoupled to the ear canal via asmall plastic tube ased tone (upper panel)and an AM tone (lower panel). The half- (20mmlength, 1mminner diameter)that penetrated the wave rectified versions of the signals (only the upper parts)are foam of the ear tip. It wascalibrated in a1.3-cm3 cavity almost indistinguishable. using aBrüel &Kjær 4153 microphone. Asecond such plastic tube penetrated the ear tip foam to deliverthe other sounds into the ear canal. These were produced by asmall biased were set to equal peak level. Levels corresponded insert earphone (ER4B, Etymotic Research)that wasdi- to either 40 phon, or 50 phon of the pure tone (ISO 226). rectly drivenbythe line output of the audio device (RME The phase of the amplitude modulation and that of the 8- Fireface UC). Using separate sound sources ensured that Hz biasing tone wasindependent and random in each trial. AM due to hardware non-linearities were <1%. In con- The duration of all stimuli was1200 ms, including 250 ms trast, the line output of the 8-Hz biasing tone waslow-pass cosine ramps at onset and offset. filtered (6 dB/octave,passive,fc=10 Hz)before power amplification (BEAK Type BAA120). 2.4. Procedures This filter,together with the acoustic low-pass filtering effect of the 8-m polyethylene tube and appropriate elec- The measurement of each subject, including breaks, took tric attenuation, made sure that at maximum electric out- up to three hours. It wasdone in the ear of their pref- put of the audio device, the sound pressure in the ear canal erence. Before the discrimination task could commence, could not exceed 105 phon [5, 6]. LRBT had to be determined for the eight AM reference stimuli. Initially,subjects made themselves familiar with 2.2. Subjects the infrasound biasing tone and its effect on the pure tone in asimple LRBT adjustment procedure (buttons “up” and Tenfemale and four male normal-hearing subjects (18to “down”), starting from lowlevels. Forall eight condi- 49 years), without self-reported hearing abnormality,were tions, theywere asked to set the biasing tone levelsothat recruited. Their auditory threshold for 8Hz, 63 Hz and the pure tone in the second interval wasperceivedwith 125 Hz wastested using the standard audiometric proce- equal modulation as the leading reference AM tone. These dure (but with 3-dB instead of 5-dB steps). None of the served as individual starting levels for the subsequent, subjects had thresholds above 10 dB HL [5, 6]. However, more accurate maximum-likelihood-tracking (MLT)pro- one male and one female subject were unable to perform cedure. Here, both kind of stimuli were presented in ran- the psychometric procedure so that only 12 subjects com- dom order in twointervals. In a2AFC task, the subjects pleted the study. were asked: “Which of the twointervals wasstronger modulated?” The tracks of the eight conditions, each end- 2.3. Stimulus conditions ing after sixteen trials, were interleavedinrandom order. Atotal of eight reference AM stimuli were used, four Foreach condition, the average LRBT of three repeats de- with acarrier frequencyof63Hzand four with 125 Hz. fined the individual’sLRBT,unless avalue deviated by We predicted that the infrasound detection might be eas- more than 4dBfrom anyother,inwhich case it wasex- ier at larger sound pressure, and modified therefore two cluded from the average. further parameters of the AM tone for which we expected The LRBT were then individually set for the final dis- the required biasing tone level(LRBT)tovary to produce crimination task, which wasa1-interval, yes-no proce- amatching perceivedloudness modulation of the biased dure with the question: “Did this stimulus contain infra- pure tone: the modulation depth of the AM tone (25% sound?” Foreach of the eight conditions, atotal of 50 tri- and 37.5%)and its sound pressure. All modulations were als were presented, where half consisted of the AM tone clearly audible. Since we expected asuppression in loud- and half of the corresponding biased tone (containing the ness due to biasing [7], the AM tones and pure tones to be infrasound at LRBT). This gave atotal of 400 trials, which 826 Marquardt, Jurado: Amplitude modulation confusion ACTA ACUSTICA UNITED WITH ACUSTICA Vol. 104 (2018) were presented in random order.The variation in loudness and modulation depth across the eight stimulus conditions 116 modulation depth made the task less monotonous for the subjects. Before the 37.5% actual test, the subjects had atraining session with feed- 114 25% back, using ashorter series of 48 trials.
Recommended publications
  • Acoustic Textiles - the Case of Wall Panels for Home Environment
    Acoustic Textiles - The case of wall panels for home environment Bachelor Thesis Work Bachelor of Science in Engineering in Textile Technology Spring 2013 The Swedish school of Textiles, Borås, Sweden Report number: 2013.2.4 Written by: Louise Wintzell, Ti10, [email protected] Abstract Noise has become an increasing public health problem and has become serious environment pollution in our daily life. This indicates that it is in time to control and reduce noise from traffic and installations in homes and houses. Today a plethora of products are available for business, but none for the private market. The project describes a start up of development of a sound absorbing wall panel for the private market. It will examine whether it is possible to make a wall panel that can lower the sound pressure level with 3 dB, or reach 0.3 s in reverberation time, in a normally furnished bedroom and still follow the demands of price and environmental awareness. To start the project a limitation was made to use the textiles available per meter within the range of IKEA. The test were made according to applicable standards and calculation of reverberation time and sound pressure level using Sabine’s formula and a formula for sound pressure equals sound effect. During the project, tests were made whether it was possible to achieve a sound classification C on a A-E grade scale according to ISO 11654, where A is the best, with only textiles or if a classic sound absorbing mineral wool had to be used. To reach a sound classification C, a weighted sound absorption coefficient (αw) of 0.6 as a minimum must be reached.
    [Show full text]
  • Infrasound and Low Frequency Noise of a Wind Turbine
    Vibrations in Physical Systems Vol.26 (2014) Infrasound and Low Frequency Noise of a Wind TurBine Malgorzata WOJSZNIS Institute of Applied Mechanics, Poznan University of Technology 3 Piotrowo Street, 60-965 Poznań [email protected] Jacek SZULCZYK Environmental Acoustics Laboratory EKO – POMIAR 4 Sloneczna Street, 64-600 Oborniki [email protected] ABstract The paper presents noise evaluation for a 2 MW wind turbine. The obtained results have been analyzed with regard to infrasound and low frequency noise generated during work of the wind turbine. The evaluation was based on standards and decrees binding in Poland. The paper presents also current literature data on the influ- ence of the infrasound and low frequency noise on a human being. It has been concluded, that the permissible levels of infrasound for the investigated wind turbine were not exceeded. Keywords: low frequency noise, infrasound, wind turbine 1. Introduction Research that has been conducted in the world for many years shows that noise can be described as sound below and above so called hearing threshold . It can be assumed that the infrasound , which cannot be heard by a human being, concerns frequencies below 20 Hz, and the ultrasound concerns frequencies above 20 kHz [1]. We receive it as me- chanical vibrations of the medium it passes through, transferring energy from the source in the form of acoustic waves. Puzyna in [1] describes infrasound as infraaccoustic vi- brations . Some investigations show that for some people the hearing level begins already at 16Hz, and sometimes even at 4Hz. Such a phenomenon occurs at appropriate condi- tions and at a high level of sound pressure [2].
    [Show full text]
  • Infrasound and Ultrasound
    Infrasound and Ultrasound Exposure and Protection Ranges Classical range of audible frequencies is 20-20,000 Hz <20 Hz is infrasound >20,000 Hz is ultrasound HOWEVER, sounds of sufficient intensity can be aurally detected in the range of both infrasound and ultrasound Infrasound Can be generated by natural events • Thunder • Winds • Volcanic activity • Large waterfalls • Impact of ocean waves • Earthquakes Infrasound Whales and elephants use infrasound to communicate Infrasound Can be generated by man-made events • High powered aircraft • Rocket propulsion systems • Explosions • Sonic booms • Bridge vibrations • Ships • Air compressors • Washing machines • Air heating and cooling systems • Automobiles, trucks, watercraft and rail traffic Infrasound At very specific pitch, can explode matter • Stained glass windows have been known to rupture from the organ’s basso profunda Can incapacitate and kill • Sea creatures use this power to stun and kill prey Infrasound Infrasound can be heard provided it is strong enough. The threshold of hearing is determined at least down to 4 Hz Infrasound is usually not perceived as a tonal sound but rather as a pulsating sensation, pressure on the ears or chest, or other less specific phenomena. Infrasound Produces various physiological sensations Begin as vague “irritations” At certain pitch, can be perceived as physical pressure At low intensity, can produce fear and disorientation Effects can produce extreme nausea (seasickness) Infrasound: Effects on humans Changes in blood pressure, respiratory rate, and balance. These effects occurred after exposures to infrasound at levels generally above 110 dB. Physical damage to the ear or some loss of hearing has been found in humans and/or animals at levels above 140 dB.
    [Show full text]
  • Determination of Speed of Sound in the Air Using Kundt's Tube. the Exercise Aims to Determine the Speed of Sound in the Air with Kundt's Pipe's Application
    Determination of speed of sound in the air using Kundt's tube. The exercise aims to determine the speed of sound in the air with Kundt's pipe's application. 1. Theory Waves could be divided into three main types: 1. Mechanical waves – waves propagate as an oscillation of the medium, for example, sea waves, sound waves and seismic waves. They are propagating consistent with classical physics laws and can exist only in water, air or solid-state. 2. Electromagnetic waves – waves propagate as continuous changes of electric and magnetic fields. This kind of waves doesn't require a medium, and it can propagate in a vacuum. Light, radio waves, TV waves, microwaves, X-rays are examples of electromagnetic waves. They propagate with the speed of light. 3. Matter waves – waves related to all objects in motion. The wavelength of matter waves is given by ℎ ℎ de Broglie formula λ = = . It is easier to detect matter waves of particles (e.g. electrons) than 푚푣 푝 heavy objects like a human. The waves can be divided into two types depending on the oscillation medium's direction with respect to wave propagation direction. If the oscillation direction is perpendicular to the propagation's direction, this kind of wave is called the transverse wave. If the oscillation direction is parallel to the propagation's direction, this kind of wave is called a longitudinal wave. A following formula is used to describe the propagation of the harmonic wave : 푦(푥, 푡) = 퐴 푠푖푛(푘푥 − ω푡), where: 푦(푥, 푡, ) – displacement as a function of position x and time t, A – amplitude of the wave, k – wavenumber equal to 2π/λ, where λ is a wavelength (distance between to minimum or maximum of the wave) ω – circular frequency equal to 2π/T, where T means oscillation period (kx-ωt) – phase of the wave.
    [Show full text]
  • Wind Farm Infrasound Detectability and Its Effects on the Percep- Tion of Wind Farm Noise Amplitude Modulation
    Wind farm infrasound detectability and its effects on the percep- tion of wind farm noise amplitude modulation Duc Phuc Nguyen (1), Kristy Hansen (1), Branko Zajamsek (2), Gorica Micic (2) and Peter Catcheside (2) (1) College of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia (2) Adelaide Institute for Sleep Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia ABSTRACT Some residents attribute adverse effects to the presence of wind farm (WF) infrasound. However, dominant fea- tures of windfarm noise such as infrasound, tonality and amplitude modulation span the average human hearing threshold, so attribution to infrasound is problematic. This study used a combination of pre-recorded noise stimuli, measured at 3.2 km from a wind farm, in laboratory-based listening tests to investigate human perception of infrasound and amplitude modulation at realistic sound pressure levels in a group of 14 participants. Although a small sample size warrants cautious interpretation, preliminary results suggest differential effects between self- reported non-sensitive versus noise-sensitive participants, where the latter detected infrasound above chance. Infrasound did not affect the perception of amplitude modulation. Larger studies remain needed to clarify these findings. 1 INTRODUCTION Wind farm (WF) infrasound remains controversial and the source of substantial debate regarding potential effects of wind farm noise (WFN) on human health. The main infrasonic components of WFN can be measured many kilometres away from a wind farm, but typically at levels deemed well below the normal hearing threshold (Zajamšek et al. 2016, Turnbull, Turner, and Walsh 2012, Jakobsen 2005). The evidence for infrasound-specific effects on human health is very poor. A key hypothesis that has been advanced to explain wind farm noise related complaints, and partly supported by animal studies, suggesting that WF infrasound could potentially be detected by the ear, yet not heard, although supporting evidence from human studies remain lacking (Salt and Hullar 2010).
    [Show full text]
  • A Study in Infrasound and Game Performance
    A Study in Infrasound and Game Performance By Kim Young Hornshøj Hansen Aalborg University Cph, spring 2013 Kim Young Hornshøj Hansen Spring 2013 Aalborg University CPH Master 4th Semester Table of Content 1. Introduction and Motivation ..................................................................................................................... 4 2. Initial Research .......................................................................................................................................... 5 2.1. The Power of Sound .......................................................................................................................... 5 2.1.1. Psychoacoustics ......................................................................................................................... 5 2.2. Infrasound ......................................................................................................................................... 7 2.3. Sound Reflection and Absorption. ................................................................................................. 7 2.4. State of the Art .................................................................................................................................. 9 2.4.1. Brainwaves............................................................................................................................... 11 2.4.2. The Nervous System ................................................................................................................ 12 2.4.3.
    [Show full text]
  • A Prototype Soundproof Box for Isolating Ground-Air Seismo-Acoustic Signals
    Volume 36 http://acousticalsociety.org/ 177th Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America Louisville, Kentucky 13-17 May 2019 Physical Acoustics: Paper 4pPAb9 Aprototypesoundproofboxforisolatingground-air seismo-acousticsignals PhysicsandAstronomy,BrighamYoungUniversity,Provo,Utah,84602; [email protected] RobinMatoza EarthScience,UniversityofCalifornia,SantaBarbara,SantaBarbara; [email protected] Published by the Acoustical Society of America © 2019 Acoustical Society of America. https://doi.org/10.1121/2.0001034 Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics, Vol. 36, 045002 (2019) Page 1 E. J. Lysenko et al. A prototype soundproof box for isolating ground-air seismo-acoustic signals 1. INTRODUCTION Volcanic eruptions pose a serious threat to operating aircraft, since ejecta from volcanoes have a lower melting point than the operating temperature of aircraft engines (Matoza et al. 2018a). For example, during the 2010 eruption of the Icelandic volcano Eyjafjallajökull, the ash cloud climbed almost 9 km into the atmosphere causing most of the European airspace to close for six days. The proximity of this relatively small volcanic eruption to numerous major airports caused the largest disruption of air travel since World War II. Currently, satellites are used for visual confirmation of volcanic eruptions and estimation of how much ejecta and vapor is released into the atmosphere. Recent research has focused on using infrasound from volcanoes for early volcanic eruption detection. The ability to interpret volcano infrasound has the potential to not only reduce the time to confirm an eruption but also indicate the type and amount of ejecta (Matoza et al. 2018a). Infrasound can travel thousands of kilometers due to low atmospheric absorption and atmospheric refraction effects.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of the Scientific Literature on the Health Effects Associated with Wind Turbines and Low Frequency Sound
    PSC REF#:121885 Public Service Commission of Wisconsin Exhibit 27 RECEIVED: 10/20/09, 11:52:47 AM Health Sciences Evaluation of the Scientific Literature on the Health Effects Associated with Wind Turbines and Low Frequency Sound Evaluation of the Scientific Literature on the Health Effects Associated with Wind Turbines and Low Frequency Sound Prepared for Wisconsin Public Service Commission Docket No. 6630-CE-302 Prepared by Mark Roberts, M.D., Ph.D. Jennifer Roberts, Dr.PH, MPH Exponent 185 Hansen Court Suite 100 Wood Dale, Illinois 60191 October 20, 2009 © Exponent, Inc. 0903940.000 F0T0 0809 JR03 Contents List of Figures 5 List of Tables 6 Executive Summary 7 Overview of Epidemiology 8 Epidemiology, Association, and Causation 10 Peer Review Process 13 Public Health Issues 16 Precautionary Principle 19 Background on Infrasound and Low Frequency Sound 21 Infrasound 23 Low Frequency Sound 24 Background on Wind Turbines and Noise 27 Evaluation of Scientific Literature on Health Effects 29 Applicability and Utility 30 Soundness 31 Clarity and Completeness 31 Uncertainty and Variability 32 Evaluation and Review 32 Final Included Literature 33 Health Effects of Infrasound and Low Frequency Sound 34 Human Effects 34 Annoyance 38 Disease vs. DIS-ease 39 Limitations of Scientific Literature 40 3 Conclusions 42 References 45 Appendix A 51 Final Literature 51 4 List of Figures Figure 1. The Scientific Process 11 Figure 2. The Scientific Method 12 Figure 3. Peer Review Process 14 Figure 4. Normal Equal-Loudness Level Contours 23 Figure 5. Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine 28 5 List of Tables Table 1. Risk Perception Factors For the Acceptability of Risk 18 Table 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Probing the Atmosphere with Infrasound Infrasound As a Tool
    Probing the Atmosphere with Infrasound Infrasound as a tool Hein Haak Probing or Imaging the Atmosphere with Infrasound CTBT Detection and Identification of nuclear explosions Biggest boost in Infrasound research since 1971 Complemented with radionuclide technique Medium the Atmosphere and its associated processes Dynamic, flow, elasticity and turbulence Interaction with EM-radiation, gravity and Earth rotation Most complex in the series Solid Earth, Oceans, Atmosphere Determination of Sources Imaging instruments, sources scattering and reflection the idea behind imaging is like seeing, watching as we all do, with our eyes CTBT Infrasound Network Contents Receivers Camera Noise reducers Large arrays Medium Gravity waves Sudden Stratospheric Warming Sources Sprites Rogue waves Introduction to Infrasound and atmospheric pressure waves Infrasound: longitudinal sound waves lower than 20 Hz “Sounds of silence” Restoring force is pressure Attenuation is low for moist air and extremely low for dry air Gravity waves: buoyancy waves in the atmosphere Restoring force is buoyancy in the pressure and temperature gradients Generally not in Numerical Weather Prediction Models Rossby waves: planetary waves due to the rotation of the Earth (Coriolis force) Travel from East to West Weather determining patterns The atmosphere as seen by a meteorologist Two low velocity layers Velocity of sound proportional to the square root of the temperature Highly variable winds both in strength and direction Linear map of the atmosphere These are averaged values What is the scale of the waves? Rossby wave pattern as seen from the North pole Imaging and receivers The art to make pictures is to keep track of Intensity as a function of the angle of incidence, and to get the lowest noise possible and finally, to interpret the objects on the picture in their context Imagine…..
    [Show full text]
  • Acoustics and the Performance of Music Modern Acoustics and Signal Processing
    Acoustics and the Performance of Music Modern Acoustics and Signal Processing Editor-in-Chief WILLIAM M. HARTMANN Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan Editorial Board YOICHI ANDO, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan WHITLOW W. L. AU, Hawaii Institute of Marine Biology, Kane’ohe, Hawaii ARTHUR B. BAGGEROER, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts NEVILLE H. FLETCHER, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia CHRISTOPHER R. FULLER, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia WILLIAM A. KUPERMAN, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California JOANNE L. MILLER, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts MANFRED R. SCHROEDER, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany ALEXANDRA I. TOLSTOY, A. Tolstoy Sciences, McLean, Virginia For other titles published in this series, go to www.springer.com/series/3754 Ju¨rgen Meyer Acoustics and the Performance of Music Manual for Acousticians, Audio Engineers, Musicians, Architects and Musical Instruments Makers Fifth Edition Originally published in German by PPV Medien, Edition Bochinsky Ju¨rgen Meyer Bergiusstrasse 2A D‐38116 Braunschweig Germany [email protected] Translated by Uwe Hansen 64 Heritage Drive Terre Haute IN 47803 USA [email protected] ISBN 978-0-387-09516-5 e-ISBN 978-0-387-09517-2 Library of Congress Control Number: 2008944095 # 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC Translation of the latest (fifth) edition, originally published in German by PPVMedien GmbH, Edition Bochinsky, Bergkirchen. All rights reserved. This work may not be translated or copied in whole or in part without the written permission of the publisher (Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, 233 Spring Street, New York, NY 10013, USA), except for brief excerpts in connection with reviews or scholarly analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • 1000816 [U8440012]
    3B SCIENTIFIC® PHYSICS Acoustics Kit 1000816 Instruction sheet 07/15 TL/ALF 1. Description This set of apparatus makes it possible to im- 16. Measurement of wavelength part an extensive and well-rounded overview 17. Soundboard on the topic of acoustics. The set can be used 18. Resonator box for conducting numerous experiments. 19. Spherical cavity resonator Sample experiments: 20. Stringed instruments and the laws they obey 1. String tones 21. Scales on stringed instruments 2. Pure acoustic tones 22. Measurement of string tension 3. Vibrating air columns 23. Relation between pitch and string tension 4. Open air column 24. Wind instruments and the laws they obey 5. Whistle 25. C major scale and its intervals 6. Vibrating rods 26. Harmony and dissonance 7. Infrasound 27. G major triad 8. Ultrasound 28. Four-part G major chord 9. Tuning fork with plotter pen 29. Major scales in an arbitrary key 10. Progressive waves 30. Introduction of semitones 11. Doppler effect 12. Chladni figures The set is supplied in a plastic tray with a foam 13. Chimes insert that facilitates safe storage of the indi- 14. Standing waves vidual components. 15. Overtones 1 2. Contents 1 Trays with foam inserts for acoustics kit 17 Galton whistle 2 Monochord 18 Plotter pen with holder 3 Bridge for monochord 19 Lycopodium powder 4 Metallophone 20 Plastic block for clamp 5 Chladni plate 21 Rubber top 6 Tuning fork, 1700 Hz 22 Bell dome 7 Tuning fork, 440 Hz 23 Reed pipe 8 Tuning fork with plotter pen, 21 Hz 24 Whistle 9 Spring balance 25 Steel string 10 Retaining clip 26 Nylon string 11 Table clamp 27 Resonance rope 12 Helmholtz resonators 28 Plunger 70 mm dia.
    [Show full text]
  • ECHOES Fall 2005
    The newsletter of The Acoustical Society of America Volume 15, Number 4 Fall 2005 Infrasound from the 2004-2005 earthquakes and tsunami near Sumatra Milton Garces, Pierre Caron, and Claus Hetzer Infrasound arrays in the infrasonic source location esti- Pacific and Indian Oceans that mates for the selected Sumatra are part of the International earthquake and tsunami Monitoring System (IMS) of the sequence, we deduce that sub- Comprehensive Nuclear-Test- marine earthquakes can pro- Ban Treaty (CTBT) recorded duce infrasound. The sound three distinct waveform signa- may be radiated by the vibra- tures associated with the tion of the ocean surface or the December 26, 2004 Aceh earth- vibration of land masses near quake (M9, USGS) and tsuna- the epicenter. mi. The infrasound stations It is also apparent that observed (1) seismic arrivals infrasound stations can also (P, S and surface waves) from serve as seismic and T-phase the earthquake, (2) tertiary stations for large events. For arrivals (T-phases), propagated the three submarine earth- along sound channels in the quakes that we investigated, ocean and coupled back into the differences in the observed the ground, and (3) infrasonic signals may be due to either arrivals associated with either source or propagation effects. the tsunami generation mecha- Although there is a substantial nism near the seismic source or difference between the infor- the motion of the ground above Paths of infrasound signals from earthquakes mation contained in the low sea level. All signals were (0.02 – 0.1 Hz) and high (0.5- recorded by the pressure sensors in the arrays.
    [Show full text]