Adenostoma Fasciculatum (Chamise), Arctostaphylos Canescens (Hoary Manzanita), and Arctostaphylos Virgata (Marin Manzanita) Alison S

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Adenostoma Fasciculatum (Chamise), Arctostaphylos Canescens (Hoary Manzanita), and Arctostaphylos Virgata (Marin Manzanita) Alison S The University of San Francisco USF Scholarship: a digital repository @ Gleeson Library | Geschke Center Master's Projects and Capstones Theses, Dissertations, Capstones and Projects 5-20-2016 Preserving Biodiversity for a Climate Change Future: A Resilience Assessment of Three Bay Area Species--Adenostoma fasciculatum (Chamise), Arctostaphylos canescens (Hoary Manzanita), and Arctostaphylos virgata (Marin Manzanita) Alison S. Pollack University of San Francisco, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.usfca.edu/capstone Part of the Biodiversity Commons, Biology Commons, Botany Commons, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons, Natural Resources and Conservation Commons, and the Other Environmental Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Pollack, Alison S., "Preserving Biodiversity for a Climate Change Future: A Resilience Assessment of Three Bay Area Species-- Adenostoma fasciculatum (Chamise), Arctostaphylos canescens (Hoary Manzanita), and Arctostaphylos virgata (Marin Manzanita)" (2016). Master's Projects and Capstones. 352. https://repository.usfca.edu/capstone/352 This Project/Capstone is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, Capstones and Projects at USF Scholarship: a digital repository @ Gleeson Library | Geschke Center. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Projects and Capstones by an authorized administrator of USF Scholarship: a digital repository @ Gleeson Library | Geschke Center. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 1 This Master's Project Preserving Biodiversity for a Climate Change Future: A Resilience Assessment of Three Bay Area Species--Adenostoma fasciculatum (Chamise), Arctostaphylos canescens (Hoary Manzanita), and Arctostaphylos virgata (Marin Manzanita) by Alison S. Pollack is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of: Master of Science in Environmental Management at the University of San Francisco Submitted: Received: ................................…………. ................................…………. Alison S. Pollack 5/18/16 Tracy L. Benning, ph.D. 5/18/16 2 3 Table of Contents i Abstract ......................................................................................................................................... 6 ii Key Words ................................................................................................................................... 7 iiii Roadmap .................................................................................................................................... 7 I Introduction and Background ....................................................................................................... 8 Introduction to Climate Change ............................................................................................ 8 1.1 Overview .......................................................................................................................................... 8 1.2 Projections ....................................................................................................................................... 8 1.3 Trajectory ...................................................................................................................................... 11 2.1 Climate Change–Vegetation Overview ........................................................................................ 12 2.2 Succession ..................................................................................................................................... 13 2.3 Species Vulnerability ..................................................................................................................... 14 2.4 Physiology of Climate Resilient Vegetation ................................................................................. 14 2.5 Geography, Risk, Sensitivity .......................................................................................................... 16 2.6 Chaparral and Coastal Scrub Ecosystems .................................................................................... 18 2.7 Chaparral and Coastal Scrub ........................................................................................................ 20 2.8 Nutrients ........................................................................................................................................ 21 3.1 Introduction to Chosen Species ................................................................................................... 21 3.2 Chamise ......................................................................................................................................... 21 3.3 Manzanita ...................................................................................................................................... 23 3.4 Hoary Manzanita ........................................................................................................................... 23 3.5 Marin Manzanita ......................................................................................................................... 25 3.6 Study Area .................................................................................................................. 28 3.7 Rare Plants ..................................................................................................................................... 30 3.8 Refugia ........................................................................................................................................... 30 3.9 Assisted Migration ........................................................................................................................ 32 II Objective ................................................................................................................................... 33 III Methods .................................................................................................................................... 34 IV Results...................................................................................................................................... 37 4.1 Recruitment................................................................................................................................... 37 Seed bank ............................................................................................................................................ 39 4.2 Fire Risk ......................................................................................................................................... 42 4.3 Temperature exposure risk .......................................................................................................... 48 4.4 Water uptake risk .......................................................................................................................... 57 4.5 Plant Height ................................................................................................................................... 64 4.6 Potential Refugia ........................................................................................................................... 65 V Discussion ................................................................................................................................. 68 5.1 Synthesis of Results ...................................................................................................... 68 5.2 Disclaimer ..................................................................................................................... 69 5.3 Other Factors ................................................................................................................. 70 VI Recommendations.................................................................................................................... 71 VII Conclusion .............................................................................................................................. 74 IX Appendix-Tools for determining Vulnerability/Resilience ..................................................... 75 X Works Cited .............................................................................................................................. 77 4 List of Figures Figure 1 Evidence of Climate Change……………………………………………….………………………….……………..6 Figure 2 Climate Change Projections………………………………………………………….…………………….…………7 Figure 3 Palmer Drought Severity Index as of February 2016…………………….………………….……………8 Figure 4 Climate Change Projections for Northern California…………………….……………………………….8 Figure 5 Percent Vegetation Cover by Region……………………………………………………………………..……10 Figure 6 Venn Diagram of sensitivity vs. risk…………………………………………….…………………….…………14 Figure 7 Chaparral Distribution Map of California……………………………………………………………..……..15 Figure 8 Sprouting Categories……………………………………………………………………………………………………17 Figure 9 Adenostoma fasciculatum (Chamise)…………………………………………………….……………………18 Figure 10 Genus Distribution…………………………………………………..………………………………………………..19 Figure 11 Arctostaphylos canescens (Hoary Manzanita)…………………………………………….……….…….19 Figure 12 Arctostaphylos virgata (Marin Manzanita)……………………………………………..…….……….….21 Figure 13 Status and Management Recommendations for A. virgata………………………………………..26 Figure 14 Species Distribution Map……………………………………………………………………………………………27 Figure 15 Study Area Microclimate Map……………………………………………………………………………………28 Figure 16 A. fasciculatum Seed…………………………………………………………………………………………………..36
Recommended publications
  • Qty Size Name Price 10 1G Abies Bracteata 12.00 $ 15 1G Abutilon
    REGIONAL PARKS BOTANIC GARDEN, TILDEN REGIONAL PARK, BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA Celebrating 78 years of growing California native plants: 1940-2018 **PRELIMINARY**PLANT SALE LIST **PRELIMINARY** Preliminary Plant Sale List 9/29/2018 visit: www.nativeplants.org for the most up to date plant list, updates are posted until 10/5 FALL PLANT SALE OF CALIFORNIA NATIVE PLANTS SATURDAY, October 6, 2018 PUBLIC SALE: 10:00 AM TO 3:00 PM MEMBERS ONLY SALE: 9:00 AM TO 10:00 AM MEMBERSHIPS ARE AVAILABLE AT THE ENTRY TO THE SALE AT 8:30 AM Qty Size Name Price 10 1G Abies bracteata $ 12.00 15 1G Abutilon palmeri $ 11.00 1 1G Acer circinatum $ 10.00 3 5G Acer circinatum $ 40.00 8 1G Acer macrophyllum $ 9.00 10 1G Achillea millefolium 'Calistoga' $ 8.00 25 4" Achillea millefolium 'Island Pink' OUR INTRODUCTION! $ 5.00 28 1G Achillea millefolium 'Island Pink' OUR INTRODUCTION! $ 8.00 6 1G Actea rubra f. neglecta (white fruits) $ 9.00 3 1G Adenostoma fasciculatum $ 10.00 1 4" Adiantum aleuticum $ 10.00 6 1G Adiantum aleuticum $ 13.00 10 4" Adiantum shastense $ 10.00 4 1G Adiantum x tracyi $ 13.00 2 2G Aesculus californica $ 12.00 1 4" Agave shawii var. shawii $ 8.00 1 1G Agave shawii var. shawii $ 15.00 4 1G Allium eurotophilum $ 10.00 3 1G Alnus incana var. tenuifolia $ 8.00 4 1G Amelanchier alnifolia var. semiintegrifolia $ 9.00 8 2" Anemone drummondii var. drummondii $ 4.00 9 1G Anemopsis californica $ 9.00 8 1G Apocynum cannabinum $ 8.00 2 1G Aquilegia eximia $ 8.00 15 4" Aquilegia formosa $ 6.00 11 1G Aquilegia formosa $ 8.00 10 1G Aquilegia formosa 'Nana' $ 8.00 Arabis - see Boechera 5 1G Arctostaphylos auriculata $ 11.00 2 1G Arctostaphylos auriculata - large inflorescences from Black Diamond $ 11.00 1 1G Arctostaphylos bakeri $ 11.00 15 1G Arctostaphylos bakeri 'Louis Edmunds' $ 11.00 2 1G Arctostaphylos canescens subsp.
    [Show full text]
  • Arctostaphylos Hispidula, Gasquet Manzanita
    Conservation Assessment for Gasquet Manzanita (Arctostaphylos hispidula) Within the State of Oregon Photo by Clint Emerson March 2010 U.S.D.A. Forest Service Region 6 and U.S.D.I. Bureau of Land Management Interagency Special Status and Sensitive Species Program Author CLINT EMERSON is a botanist, USDA Forest Service, Rogue River-Siskiyou National Forest, Gold Beach and Powers Ranger District, Gold Beach, OR 97465 TABLE OF CONTENTS Disclaimer 3 Executive Summary 3 List of Tables and Figures 5 I. Introduction 6 A. Goal 6 B. Scope 6 C. Management Status 7 II. Classification and Description 8 A. Nomenclature and Taxonomy 8 B. Species Description 9 C. Regional Differences 9 D. Similar Species 10 III. Biology and Ecology 14 A. Life History and Reproductive Biology 14 B. Range, Distribution, and Abundance 16 C. Population Trends and Demography 19 D. Habitat 21 E. Ecological Considerations 25 IV. Conservation 26 A. Conservation Threats 26 B. Conservation Status 28 C. Known Management Approaches 32 D. Management Considerations 33 V. Research, Inventory, and Monitoring Opportunities 35 Definitions of Terms Used (Glossary) 39 Acknowledgements 41 References 42 Appendix A. Table of Known Sites in Oregon 45 2 Disclaimer This Conservation Assessment was prepared to compile existing published and unpublished information for the rare vascular plant Gasquet manzanita (Arctostaphylos hispidula) as well as include observational field data gathered during the 2008 field season. This Assessment does not represent a management decision by the U.S. Forest Service (Region 6) or Oregon/Washington BLM. Although the best scientific information available was used and subject experts were consulted in preparation of this document, it is expected that new information will arise.
    [Show full text]
  • 95 Oak Ecosystem Restoration on Santa Catalina Island, California
    95 QUANTIFICATION OF FOG INPUT AND USE BY QUERCUS PACIFICA ON SANTA CATALINA ISLAND Shaun Evola and Darren R. Sandquist Department of Biological Science, California State University, Fullerton 800 N. State College Blvd., Fullerton, CA 92834 USA Email address for corresponding author (D. R. Sandquist): [email protected] ABSTRACT: The proportion of water input resulting from fog, and the impact of canopy dieback on fog-water input, was measured throughout 2005 in a Quercus pacifica-dominated woodland of Santa Catalina Island. Stable isotopes of oxygen were measured in water samples from fog, rain and soils and compared to those found in stem-water from trees in order to identify the extent to which oak trees use different water sources, including fog drip, in their transpirational stream. In summer 2005, fog drip contributed up to 29 % of water found in the upper soil layers of the oak woodland but oxygen isotope ratios in stem water suggest that oak trees are using little if any of this water, instead depending primarily on water from a deeper source. Fog drip measurements indicate that the oak canopy in this system actually inhibits fog from reaching soil underneath the trees; however, fog may contribute additional water in areas with no canopy. Recent observations on Santa Catalina show a significant decline in oak woodlands, with replacement by non-native grasslands. The results of this study indicate that as canopy dieback and oak mortality continue additional water may become available for these invasive grasses. KEYWORDS: Fog drip, oak woodland, Quercus pacifica, Santa Catalina Island, stable isotopes, water use.
    [Show full text]
  • Arctostaphylos Photos Susan Mcdougall Arctostaphylos Andersonii
    Arctostaphylos photos Susan McDougall Arctostaphylos andersonii Santa Cruz Manzanita Arctostaphylos auriculata Mount Diablo Manzanita Arctostaphylos bakeri ssp. bakeri Baker's Manzanita Arctostaphylos bakeri ssp. sublaevis The Cedars Manzanita Arctostaphylos canescens ssp. canescens Hoary Manzanita Arctostaphylos canescens ssp. sonomensis Sonoma Canescent Manzanita Arctostaphylos catalinae Catalina Island Manzanita Arctostaphylos columbiana Columbia Manzanita Arctostaphylos confertiflora Santa Rosa Island Manzanita Arctostaphylos crustacea ssp. crinita Crinite Manzanita Arctostaphylos crustacea ssp. crustacea Brittleleaf Manzanita Arctostaphylos crustacea ssp. rosei Rose's Manzanita Arctostaphylos crustacea ssp. subcordata Santa Cruz Island Manzanita Arctostaphylos cruzensis Arroyo De La Cruz Manzanita Arctostaphylos densiflora Vine Hill Manzanita Arctostaphylos edmundsii Little Sur Manzanita Arctostaphylos franciscana Franciscan Manzanita Arctostaphylos gabilanensis Gabilan Manzanita Arctostaphylos glandulosa ssp. adamsii Adam's Manzanita Arctostaphylos glandulosa ssp. crassifolia Del Mar Manzanita Arctostaphylos glandulosa ssp. cushingiana Cushing's Manzanita Arctostaphylos glandulosa ssp. glandulosa Eastwood Manzanita Arctostaphylos glauca Big berry Manzanita Arctostaphylos hookeri ssp. hearstiorum Hearst's Manzanita Arctostaphylos hookeri ssp. hookeri Hooker's Manzanita Arctostaphylos hooveri Hoover’s Manzanita Arctostaphylos glandulosa ssp. howellii Howell's Manzanita Arctostaphylos insularis Island Manzanita Arctostaphylos luciana
    [Show full text]
  • Quantifying Fog Contributions to Water Balance in a Coastal California Watershed
    Received: 27 February 2017 Accepted: 11 August 2017 DOI: 10.1002/hyp.11312 RESEARCH ARTICLE How much does dry-season fog matter? Quantifying fog contributions to water balance in a coastal California watershed Michaella Chung1 Alexis Dufour2 Rebecca Pluche2 Sally Thompson1 1Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, Abstract Davis Hall, Berkeley,CA 94720, USA The seasonally-dry climate of Northern California imposes significant water stress on ecosys- 2San Francisco Public Utilities Commission, 525 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, CA tems and water resources during the dry summer months. Frequently during summer, the only 94102, USA water inputs occur as non-rainfall water, in the form of fog and dew. However, due to spa- Correspondence tially heterogeneous fog interaction within a watershed, estimating fog water fluxes to under- Michaella Chung, Department of Civil and stand watershed-scale hydrologic effects remains challenging. In this study, we characterized Environmental Engineering, University of California, Berkeley,Davis Hall, Berkeley,CA the role of coastal fog, a dominant feature of Northern Californian coastal ecosystems, in a 94720, USA. San Francisco Peninsula watershed. To monitor fog occurrence, intensity, and spatial extent, Email: [email protected] we focused on the mechanisms through which fog can affect the water balance: throughfall following canopy interception of fog, soil moisture, streamflow, and meteorological variables. A stratified sampling design was used to capture the watershed's spatial heterogeneities in rela- tion to fog events. We developed a novel spatial averaging scheme to upscale local observations of throughfall inputs and evapotranspiration suppression and make watershed-scale estimates of fog water fluxes.
    [Show full text]
  • 44 Old-Growth Chaparral 12/20
    THE CHAPARRALIAN December 25, 2020 #44 Volume 10, Issue 1 2 The Chaparralian #44 Contents 3 The Legacy of Old-Growth Chaparral 4 The Photography of Chaparralian Alexander S. Kunz 8 A New Vision for Chaparral 11 The Dance Between Arctostaphylos and Ceanothus 14 Unfoldings Cover photograph: A magnificent old-growth red shanks or ribbonwood (Adenostoma sparsifolium) with a chaparral elf exploring its The Chaparralian is the periodic journal of the California Chaparral branches. Photo taken in the Descanso Ranger Institute, a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization dedicated to the District, Cleveland National Forest, by Richard preservation of native shrubland ecosystems and supporting the W. Halsey. creative spirit as inspired by Nature. To join the Institute and receive The Chaparralian, please visit our website or fill out and Photo upper left: Old-growth manzanita in The mail in the slip below. We welcome unsolicited submissions to the fabulous Burton Mesa Ecological Preserve, Chaparralian. Please send to: [email protected] or via near Lompoc, CA. The reserve is a 5,368-acre post to the address below. protected area, managed by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife. In this photo, You can find us on the web at: https://californiachaparral.org/ an ephemeral Chaparrailan enjoys the ancient, twisting branches of the rare, endemic Purisima Publisher................................... Richard W. Halsey manzanita (Arctostaphylos purissima). Photo by Editor....................................... Dylan Tweed Richard W. Halsey. Please Join the California Chaparral Institute and support our research and educational efforts to help promote a better understanding of and appreciation for the remarkable biodiversity found in shrubland ecosystems and to encourage the creative spirit as inspired by Nature.
    [Show full text]
  • Definition of Maritime Chaparral in the Manual of California Vegetation
    Definition of Maritime Chaparral What is Maritime Chaparral? (Focus: Northern and Central Maritime Chaparral) in the Manual of California Vegetation John O. Sawyer, Humboldt State University Professor Emeritus Julie M. Evens, California Native Plant Society Vegetation Ecologist Shrublands whose plants have sclerophyllous leaves and grow in Many habitats contain distinctive nutrient-poor soils on windward uplands plant species and characteristic and coastal lowlands of northern and vegetation types that make habitats central California (from Mendocino to easy to distinguish from Santa Barbara Cos.). other habitats. “The kind of site or region with Northern/Central Maritime Chaparral respect to physical features (as soil, weather, elevation) naturally or exists on California’s coast normally preferred by a biological between southern Mendocino and species” – Merriam-Webster Dictionary Santa Barbara Cos. Alkali sinks, fens, freshwater marshes, salt marshes, vernal pools 1 Maritime chaparral Maritime chaparral contains plants adapted to areas has nutrient-poor soils and occurs with cool, foggy summers, unlike on windward uplands and coastal interior chaparral types (where lowlands summers are not moderated by fog) In maritime chaparral – Maritime chaparral Periodic burning is necessary for includes Arctostaphylos or renewal of plant populations that Ceanothus species, including any characterize the habitat. narrow endemics considered rare and endangered. Recent fire suppression practices have reduced the size and They characterize the habitat. frequency of wildfires in the habitat. In maritime chaparral – In maritime chaparral – Recent conditions favor longer- lived Agricultural conversion, residential shrubs and trees over shorter-lived, development, and fire suppression crown-sprouting or obligate-seeding have fragmented and degraded shrubs characteristic of the habitat.
    [Show full text]
  • California Flora Nursery Field Inventory for November 7, 2016
    California Flora Nursery Field Inventory for November 7, 2016 4 4 inch = $5.00 T " S $9.50 $10.50 $25.00 T = T = 5G = = $35.00 1G perennials & grasses = $8.50/$10.00 P $11.00 P $12.00 $30.00 7G Short Treepot Tall Treepot 5 Gallon 7 Gallon N 4" 4" ferns = $5.50 1G 1G ferns = $10.00 o Lavender labels indicate specialty prices. n 1G vines, shrubs, & trees = $9.50/$11.00 - 10 or more of the same plant 10% off N 20 or more of the same plant 20% off a t i S T v T T 5G e Plant Common Name 4" 1G P P 7G Abies concolor (2 in 2G) white fir 22 Abies grandis grand fir 23 Acer circinatum vine maple 17 15 Acer glabrum Sierra maple 2 Acer macrophyllum bigleaf maple 31 Achillea millefolium 'Island Pink' yarrow 13 Adenostema fasciculatum chamise 5 Adiantum capillus-veneris southern maidenhair fern 116 Adiantum X tracyi Tracy's maidenhair fern 36 Aesculus californica California buckeye 39 12 10 Alnus incana ssp. tenuifolia mountain alder 2 Amorpha californica napense $15 1 Anemone deltoidea western white anemone 8 Angelica tomentosa foothill angelica 10 8 Arctostaphylos 'Austin Griffiths' manzanita 9 Arctostaphylos canescens canescens 5 Arctostaphylos edmundsii 'Carmel Sur' Little Sur manzanita 98 Arctostaphylos 'Emerald Carpet' manzanita 266 Arctostaphylos glandulosa Eastwood manzanita 2 6 Arctostaphylos hookeri 'Monterey Carpet' 2 Arctostaphylos hookeri 'Wayside' 13 Arctostaphylos 'Howard McMinn' manzanita 122 Arctostaphylos 'John Dourley' manzanita 151 4 Arctostaphylos 'Laguna White' manzanita 4 Container Sizes: Outside diameter x Height S T 14" T T 11.5" 1G 9.25" 14" 5G 7G 4" 3.9" 7" P P 3.3" 6" 4" 4" 10" 12" 4 inch 1 Gallon Short Treepot Tall Treepot 5 Gallon 7 Gallon 1 S T N T T 5G N Plant Common Name 4" 1G P P 7G Arctostaphylos 'Lester Rowntree' 14 Arctostaphylos 'Lutsko's Pink' manzanita 8 Arctostaphylos manzanita 50 Arctostaphylos manzanita 'Hood Mountain' 6 Arctostaphylos manzanita 'Sebastopol White' manzanita 2 Arctostaphylos manzanita (St.
    [Show full text]
  • Almeta Barrett
    VOLUME 9, NUMBER 3 OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY OCTOBER 2003 Almeta Barrett: Manzanitas – A study in speciation patterns A pioneer woman botanist in Oregon Part II: Summary of the Oregon taxa of Arctostaphylos by Robin Lodewick by Kenton L. Chambers Only a few women, as far as we know, collected new For the Oregon Vascular Plant Checklist, we are plants in the early Pacific Northwest, sending them to the recognizing the following 8 species of manzanitas as Eastern botanical establishment for naming. One of these occurring in the state. This is many fewer than the 57 was Almeta Hodge Barrett, an Oregon pioneer. Almeta was species, with accompanying subspecies, found in the wife of a former Civil War surgeon, Dr. Perry Barrett, California according to the treatment by P. V. Wells in The who began a medical practice in Pennsylvania following the Jepson Manual. Two rare species of northern California war. After losing nearly everything to a fire however, the cited by Wells, A. klamathensis and A. nortensis, are found couple chose to start over in the west. In 1871, with year-old just south of Oregon but have not yet been discovered in daughter Julia, the family traveled to Portland, then up the this state. As mentioned in Part I of this article, most of Columbia to where Hood River joins the mighty River of the taxonomic complexity in Oregon manzanitas is seen in the West. There, in the fertile Hood River Valley, the family Curry, Josephine, and Jackson counties. It is important to established their homestead. observe population variability and to take careful notes on The Barretts built a two-story house and barn and the habit and burl development, when collecting specimens in doctor began to accept patients.
    [Show full text]
  • A Checklist of Vascular Plants Endemic to California
    Humboldt State University Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University Botanical Studies Open Educational Resources and Data 3-2020 A Checklist of Vascular Plants Endemic to California James P. Smith Jr Humboldt State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Smith, James P. Jr, "A Checklist of Vascular Plants Endemic to California" (2020). Botanical Studies. 42. https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps/42 This Flora of California is brought to you for free and open access by the Open Educational Resources and Data at Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Botanical Studies by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A LIST OF THE VASCULAR PLANTS ENDEMIC TO CALIFORNIA Compiled By James P. Smith, Jr. Professor Emeritus of Botany Department of Biological Sciences Humboldt State University Arcata, California 13 February 2020 CONTENTS Willis Jepson (1923-1925) recognized that the assemblage of plants that characterized our flora excludes the desert province of southwest California Introduction. 1 and extends beyond its political boundaries to include An Overview. 2 southwestern Oregon, a small portion of western Endemic Genera . 2 Nevada, and the northern portion of Baja California, Almost Endemic Genera . 3 Mexico. This expanded region became known as the California Floristic Province (CFP). Keep in mind that List of Endemic Plants . 4 not all plants endemic to California lie within the CFP Plants Endemic to a Single County or Island 24 and others that are endemic to the CFP are not County and Channel Island Abbreviations .
    [Show full text]
  • Manzanitas (Arctostaphylos Species) Known to Be Susceptible to Phytophthora Ramorum
    April 3, 2020 Manzanitas (Arctostaphylos species) known to be susceptible to Phytophthora ramorum (Many of the species listed below are not yet on the USDA APHIS P. ramorum proven host or associated host list.) Arctostaphylos columbiana (bristly manzanita, hairy manzanita) – On the USDA APHIS P. ramorum associated host list. First reported in February 2006 by Rizzo, UC Davis (DiLeo et al. 2008). Arctostaphylos columbiana is native to the Pacific coast from northern California to British Columbia. Hairy manzanita is often available at native plant and horticultural nurseries. Arctostaphylos glandulosa (Eastwood's manzanita) – First reported with P. ramorum symptoms on Mt. Tamalpais in June 2015 (Rooney-Latham et al. 2017). Arctostaphylos glandulosa is native to the Pacific coast from Baja California to southern Oregon, and includes eleven subspecies (adamsii, atumescens, crassifolia, cushingiana, erecta, gabrielensis, glandulosa, howellii, juarezensis, leucophylla, mollis). Arctostaphylos glandulosa subsp. crassifolia (Del Mar manzanita) is listed as rare, threatened, or endangered in California and elsewhere (CA RPR 1B.1). Arctostaphylos glandulosa subsp. gabrielensis (San Gabriel manzanita) is listed as rare, threatened, or endangered in California and elsewhere (CA RPR 1B.2) and as Sensitive Species for both Bureau of Land Management and U.S. Forest Service. Eastwood's manzanita is often available at native plant nurseries. Arctostaphylos glauca (bigberry manzanita) – First reported as a P. ramorum host by Rooney- Latham and Blomquist, CDFA (publication in prep, 2020). Arctostaphylos glauca is native to California and Baja California, where it grows in chaparral and woodland ecosystems. Bigberry manzanita is often available at nurseries. Cultivars include 'Blue Corgi', 'Dwaine's Dwarf', ' Frazier Park Manzanita', ' Los Angeles', 'Margarita Pearl', ' Ramona'.
    [Show full text]
  • Sir Francis Drake Boulevard Rehabilitation Project Final Environmental Impact Report
    SIR FRANCIS DRAKE BOULEVARD REHABILITATION PROJECT FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT STATE CLEARING HOUSE NUMBER 2008112004 January 2011 SIR FRANCIS DRAKE BOULEVARD REHABILITATION PROJECT FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT SCH # 2008112004 Submitted to: Marin County Department of Public Works 3501 Civic Center Drive San Rafael, California 94903 Contact: Mr. Dave Bernardi (415) 499-6530 Prepared by: LSA Associates, Inc. 157 Park Place Point Richmond, California 94801 (510) 236-6810 LSA Project No. BKF0902 January 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1.0 INTRODUCTION.........................................................................................................1 1.1 PURPOSE OF THE EIR..................................................................................................1 1.2 PROPOSED ACTION .....................................................................................................1 1.3 CONTENTS OF THE EIR...............................................................................................2 1.4 PUBLIC REVIEW AND COMMENTS..........................................................................3 1.5 EIR PROCESS.................................................................................................................3 CHAPTER 2.0 SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................5 2.1 SUMMARY OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT ................................................................5 2.2 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT UNAVOIDABLE ADVERSE IMPACTS
    [Show full text]