Historic Preservation Design Guidelines

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Historic Preservation Design Guidelines City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines Historic Preservation Design Guidelines table of contents introduction Why Preserve Historic Resources 8 Purpose of the Design Guidelines 10 How to Use the Guidelines 10 Design Review Process 13 historic overview Aspen Historic Overview 16 Architectural Styles in Aspen 21 design guidelines: Chapter 1: Site Planning & Landscape Design 36 context design guidelines: Chapter 2: Building Materials 52 Chapter 3: Windows 55 rehabilitation Chapter 4: Doors 59 Chapter 5: Porches & Balconies 63 Chapter 6: Architectural Details 66 Chapter 7: Roofs 68 Chapter 8: Secondary Structures 73 design guidelines: Chapter 9: Excavation, Building Relocation, & Foundations 76 Chapter 10: Building Additions 79 new construction Chapter 11: New Buildings on Landmarked Properties 85 design guidelines: Chapter 12: Accessibility, Architectural Lighting, general Mechanical Equipment, Services Areas, & Signage 90 appendix Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Historic Preservation 94 INTRODUCTION IntroductIon INTRODUCTION Aspen is a unique community, rich with history, Note: Not every guidelines will apply to each dramatic landscapes, a vibrant economy, and vital project, and some balancing of the guidelines cultural scene. Each of these elements contributes must occur on a case-by-case basis. The to the appeal of the City and enhances its livability. Aspen Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) Within this context, the preservation of historic must determine that a sufficient number of the resources is a high priority. This policy is articulated relevant guidelines have been adequately met in in the Aspen Area Community Plan and in ordinances order to approve a project proposal. It must be that address protection of landmarked properties and emphasized that these are only guidelines and historic districts. they are not applicable in all cases, and need to be weighed with the practicality of the measure. This document provides background on the City’s preservation program and local history and then hand craftsmanship that is more unusual today. presents design guidelines that articulate policies for Some AspenModern structures represent early use of the treatment of locally-designated historic properties building technologies that continue to be favored. and districts. Adaptability Why Preserve Historic Resources Owners frequently find that the floor plans of historic Across the nation, thousands of communities buildings easily accommodate modern lifestyles and promote historic preservation because doing so support a diversity of populations. Many rooms are contributes to neighborhood livability, variety, and large, permitting a variety of uses while retaining quality of life, minimizes negative impacts on the the overall historic character of the structure. Even environment and yields economic rewards. These historic buildings that are smaller in scale often have same reasons apply in Aspen. Preservation of the lots that can accommodate additions, if needed. built environment in Aspen provides a fundamental link to the past. Many of the buildings tell the story Livability and Quality of Life of Aspen’s unique historical development. Preserving When groups of older buildings occur as a historic these resources creates a sense of place for those district, such as along Main Street or the Commercial who live here and provides visitors a connection with Core in Aspen, they create a street scene that is this unique heritage. pedestrian friendly, and encourages walking and neighborly interaction. Mature trees and decorative Construction Quality architectural features also contribute to a sense of Many of the historic structures in the City are of high identity that is unique for each historic neighborhood— quality construction. Other buildings are more modest, an attribute that is rare and difficult to achieve in but even so may have used lumber from mature trees newer areas of a city. These therefore are desirable that were properly seasoned and typically milled to places to live and work. full dimension, which often yields stronger framing. Historic masonry walls were carefully laid, resulting in Environmental Benefits buildings with considerable stability. Preserving a historic structure is sound environmental conservation policy because “recycling” saves energy Many older structures were thoughtfully detailed and and reduces the need for producing new construction the finishes of materials, including fixtures, wood materials. Three types of energy savings occur: floors and trim, were of high quality and exemplify 8 • City of Aspen • Historic Preservation Design Guidelines IntroductIon • First, energy is not consumed to demolish the incentives also exist to help offset potential added existing building and dispose of the resulting costs of appropriate rehabilitation procedures. debris. Income tax credits are offered at the state and federal • Second, energy is not used to create new building levels for appropriate rehabilitation. Eligible projects materials, transport them and assemble them on also can qualify for the Colorado Historical Society’s site. State Historical Fund, a substantial opportunity for owners of commercial and significant residential • Finally, the embodied energy which was used to properties. create the original building and its components, is preserved. The City also offers financial bonuses which are available for historic landmarks. The Aspen Historic By reusing older buildings, pressure is reduced to Preservation Commission (HPC) has the ability to harvest new lumber and other materials that may award zoning bonuses to historic landmarks. have negative effects on the environment of other locales where these materials are produced. Responsibility of Ownership Ownership of a historic property carries both the Economic Benefits benefits described above and a responsibility to Historic resources are finite and cannot be replaced, respect the historic character of the resource and its making them precious commodities that many buyers setting. While this responsibility does exist, it does not seek. Preservation adds value to private property. automatically translate into higher construction or Many studies across the nation document that, where maintenance costs. Ultimately, residents and property local historic districts are established, property values owners should recognize that historic preservation typically rise, or at least are stabilized. In this sense, is a long-range community policy that promotes designation of a historic district appears to protect economic wellbeing and overall viability of the City investment. Property owners within the district know at large and that they play a vital role in helping to that the time and money they spend on improving implement that policy through careful stewardship of their properties will be matched with similar efforts the area’s historic resources. on surrounding lots. Arguably, this applies to Aspen as well. Levels of Historic Designation in Aspen Nationwide studies prove that preservation projects Local Landmark also contribute more to the local economy than do The City has identified approximately 300 historic new building programs because each dollar spent resources, including buildings, structures, parks, on a preservation project has a higher percentage cemeteries, and bridges as historic landmarks. devoted to labor and to the purchase of materials Because there was a long period of economic available locally. By contrast, new construction depression at the turn of the 20th century, historic typically has a higher percentage of each dollar spent development in Aspen generally occurred either in the devoted to materials that are produced outside of silver mining era (these resources are termed Aspen the local economy and to special construction skills Victorian) or around World War II (these resources are that may be imported. When money is spent on termed AspenModern). rehabilitating a building, it has a higher “multiplier effect,” keeping more money circulating in the The local register designation process is established community. Rehabilitation therefore, provides more through the police powers of Aspen’s zoning jobs for Aspen area residents. ordinance. Criteria for designation are set forth in city codes and designated properties are subject Heritage Tourism to protections outlined in the ordinance, including Preservation minded communities are among demolition and design review. In general, any exterior the leading tourist destinations. Aspen has an alteration to an inventoried property must be reviewed authenticity that visitors appreciate. There are many and approved before work can begin. opportunities to connect with the history of Aspen as a tourist and this contributes to longer stays and District Designation repeat visits. Currently, the City of Aspen has two locally designated historic districts, the Main Street Historic District, and Incentives for Preservation the Commercial Core Historic District. The districts While the economic benefits are substantial, special were created to preserve the character of entire City of Aspen • Historic Preservation Design Guidelines • 9 IntroductIon neighborhoods. In general, any demolition, exterior • Encourage sustainable reuse of historic alteration, or construction on a property within a structures. historic district must be reviewed and approved • Encourage voluntary efforts to increase public before work can begin. information, interaction or access to historic
Recommended publications
  • Agenda City Council Work Session
    AGENDA CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION July 15, 2019 4:00 PM, City Council Chambers 130 S Galena Street, Aspen I. COUNCIL ROUNDTABLE 4:00-4:10 II. WORK SESSION II.A. Board and Commission Interviews (round 2) II.B. Retreat follow up regarding transportation and housing framework 1 1 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Linda Manning, City Clerk DATE OF MEMO: July 11, 2019 MEETING DATE: July 15, 2019 RE: Citizen board appointments (round 2) City Council has been conducting board interviews for various citizen boards twice a year, typically in January and July. In the past, not all boards have been interviewed by Council including the Animal Shelter, Building Code Board of Appeals and the Kid’s First Board. Mayor Torre has indicated that he would like Council to interview all perspective board members. To be consistent with how board interviews have happened in the past and due to the number of applicants for each board, staff is recommending that Council interview all members for each board at the same time instead of conducting individual interviews. Included in the packet for each board will be a list of the current members, the most recent ordinance or code section as well as bylaws if available. 2 Wheeler Board of Directors 1 regular member opening 7 regular members, 1 alternate member and 1 ex officio member Current Members Chip Fuller – chair – reapplying Tom Kurt – expires 2020 Richard Stettner – expires 2022 Christine Benedetti – vice chair – expires 2023 Nina Gabianelli – expires 2020 Amy Mountjoy – expires 2023 Ziska Childs –
    [Show full text]
  • Name Elevator No CO Conveyance ID 100 EAST MAIN 18592L CP16-000072 106 N FRENCH 407503 CP09-001296 1560 PINE GROVE RD BV590464 C
    Name Elevator No CO Conveyance ID 100 EAST MAIN 18592L CP16-000072 106 N FRENCH 407503 CP09-001296 1560 PINE GROVE RD BV590464 CP13-000710 1600 PINE GROVE EJ5851 CP08-001973 1874 GEORGETOWN SCHOOL 14270-L CP12-000696 204 S GALENA ST HANDICAP LIFT 630130 CP14-000240 225 MAIN ST ER6938 CP09-003119 2551 DOLORES LLC EP1461 NOT REGISTERED WITH STATE 300 S SPRING ST COA 611067 CP12-000239 308 E HOPKINS CONDO ASSOC EAC805 CP09-005503 308 E HOPKINS CONDO ASSOC EAC806 CP09-005504 311 MAIN ST 117999 CP12-000216 320 MAIN ST CONDO ASSN 009379 CP11-000374 320 SOUTH MAIN 66083 CP15-000664 327 MAIN ST CBJ531 CP13-000031 4 POINTS LODGE EBT951 CP13-000390 415 EAST HYMAN AVE LLC 51868-FL-B CP11-002146 514 AH LLC 5021458 CP14-000647 514 AH LLC 62866 CP14-000648 625 MAIN CONDO ASSOC EBB305 CP12-000846 625 MAIN CONDO ASSOC EBB306 CP12-000847 625 MAIN CONDO ASSOC EBB304 CP12-000845 701 GRAND AVE. IE08-83307 CP09-002123 8TH ST PROF BLDG C570596038 CP12-000295 AAA STORAGE 472555 CP09-001249 ADDISON CENTER CONDO ASSOC INC 238917 CP09-002635 ADVOCATES OF LAKE COUNTY 614602 CP13-000117 AGAVE RESTAURANT 11-2198 CP09-001683 AIRPORT OPERATION CENTER BC601584 CP09-001684 AJAX MOUNTAIN BUILDING 215334 CP15-000030 ALANTE VISTA/ARROWHEAD 200907 CP09-000859 ALANTE VISTA/EAGLE RIDGE ON SUMMIT WINTERSET 2P0702 CP11-001221 1 ALLIES CABIN 455412 CP09-001451 ALLIES CABIN 37118 CP09-001450 ALLINGTON INN & SUITES EY7423 CP12-000343 ALPENGLOW HGD2621 CP08-005142 ALPINE BANK - AVON 472419 CP09-001228 ALPINE BANK - BRECK EP7197 CP09-001685 ALPINE BANK - GS F34573 CP11-000163 ALPINE
    [Show full text]
  • Three Perfect Days Colorado Rockies Story and Photography by Sam Polcer
    20 HEMI SKI 15 NOVEMBER 2015 THREE PERFECT DAYS COLORADO ROCKIES STORY AND PHOTOGRAPHY BY SAM POLCER INCE FOLKS BEGAN DELVING INTO THE ROCKIES FOR GOLD BACK IN THE MID-1800S, THIS EXTRAVAGANTLY BEAUTIFUL PART OF THE UNITED STATES HAS BEEN DOTTED S WITH BOOMTOWNS, EACH OF THEM A MAGNET FOR ADVENTURERS AND ROMANTICS. WHILE THE ADVENTURERS REMAIN, PICKAXES HAVE BEEN REPLACED BY SKI POLES, AND THE RICHES ARE ASSOCIATED WITH EXPERIENCES RATHER THAN MATERIAL WEALTH. TODAY, TOWNS LIKE BRECKENRIDGE, VAIL AND ASPEN BRIM WITH FIVE-STAR HOTELS, SOPHISTICATED EATERIES, WORLD-CLASS MUSEUMS AND BUZZING NIGHTCLUBS. BUT MAKE NO MISTAKE, THE BIGGEST DRAW OF ALL IS THE MOUNTAINS—AND THE UNPARALLELED THRILL OF HURTLING DOWN THEM. THE REAL TREASURE, IT TURNS OUT, WAS ON THE SURFACE ALL ALONG. 64 064_HEMI1115_3PD.indd 64 07/10/2015 11:12 Skiers hiking above the Kensho SuperChair to the top of Breckenridge’s Peak 6, 12,573 feet above sea level 064_HEMI1115_3PD.indd 65 07/10/2015 11:12 THREE PERFECT DAYS 2005 YEAR AUTHOR HUNTER S. THOMPSON’S ASHES WERE SHOT OUT OF A CANNON NEAR ASPEN A sugar cinnamon crumble doughnut from Sweet ColoraDough Four turns into the first run of the day, I wonderder DAY ONE aloud how common it is for Sky’s clients to hollerer with glee, which is what I do while following himm In which Sam goes to Breckenridge to test his lung down an untouched run on Peak 8. “Pretty typical,”al,” capacity and cry over the beer at Broken Compass he says, smiling. It’s been a while since I’ve skied, butbut one thing I remember, aside from how euphoric those firstst tuturnsrns on a perfectly groomed trail can feel, is that hardcore skiers T’S ALWAYS A GOOD IDEA to make note of what’s often appear to have life’s mysteries figured out.
    [Show full text]
  • Nwccog Edd Ceds 2017
    NWCCOG Economic Development District COMPREHENSIVE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY 2017-2022 1 NWCCOG Economic Development District Board of Directors: Acknowledgements: Kathy Chandler-Henry, Eagle County Commissioner DiAnn Butler, Grand County Economic Development Coordinator The report prepared by: Betsy Blecha, Jackson County Commissioner Rachel Lunney, Director, NWCCOG Economic Development District Patti Clapper, Pitkin County Commissioner This report is a culmination of the work of NWCCOG’s dedicated Karn Stiegelmeier, Summit County Commissioner Jeremy Rietmann, Economic Development Director, Town of Gypsum stakeholders including: Tom Clark, Mayor, Town of Kremmling Kelli McDonald, Economic Development Director, Town of Vail Susan Philp, Town Planner, Town of Basalt NWCCOG’s Comprehensive NWCCOG Council Members: Suze Kanack, Town Clerk, Town of Walden Jeanne McQueeney, Commissioner, Eagle County Chris Romer, President/CEO, Vail Valley Partnership Economic Development Catherine Ross, Executive Director, Winter Park/Fraser Chamber of Commerce Strategy 2017-2021 was Kris Mancuso, Commissioner, Grand County Betsy Blecha, Commissioner, Jackson County Robin Waters, President/CEO, Basalt Chamber of Commerce funded utilizing the planning Patti Clapper, Commissioner, Pitkin County Corry Mihm, Executive Director, Summit Independent Business Alliance partnership funds granted to Karn Stiegelmeier, Commissioner, Summit County Matt Gianneschi, COO/Chief of Staff, Colorado Mountain College the NWCCOG EDD by the Steve Barwick, City Manager, City of Aspen Jack Taylor, Business Services Representative, Frisco Workforce Center Economic Development Mike Scanlon, Town Manager, Town of Basalt Michelle Eddy, Town Manager, Town of Blue River Administration (EDA). These CEDS Strategy Committee: John Hoffmann, Trustee, Town of Carbondale Aaron Landau, Founder/Owner, Evo 3 CoWorkspace funds are matched 1:1 by Carolyn Skowyra, Councilmember, Town of Dillon Amy Kemp, Founder/Owner, Elevate CoSpace NWCCOG member dues.
    [Show full text]
  • Hotel & Travel Information
    Hotel & Travel Information HOTELS The Aspen Institute has secured and negotiated preferred rates at select Aspen hotels for Aspen Children’s Forum guests. Hotels, rates and information on securing reservations follows. July is peak season in Aspen, therefore guests are strongly encouraged to book hotel rooms as soon as possible. Availability at each hotel is on a first-come, first-served basis. Negotiated rates are for the nights of Wednesday, July 12, and Thursday, July 13, 2017. Please discuss rates for pre- and post-event night lodging directly with hotels for extended stays. Hotel Jerome Website: https://hoteljerome.aubergeresorts.com/ Address: 330 E Main St., Aspen, CO 81611 Negotiated Rate: $475 per night, plus fees and taxes Make a Reservation: Please call Veronica at 970-429-7696 to make a reservation. Reference the “Aspen Children’s Forum.” ASPEN CHILDREN’S FORUM — HOTEL & TRAVEL INFORMATION Aspen Meadows Resort Website: https://www.aspenmeadows.com/ Address: 845 Meadows Rd., Aspen, CO 81611 Negotiated Rate: $285 per night, plus fees and taxes Make a Reservation: Please visit this link to make a reservation within our room block: https://aws.passkey.com/go/ChildrensForum2017 The Limelight Hotel Website: https://www.limelighthotels.com/aspen Address: 355 S Monarch St., Aspen, CO 81611 Negotiated Rate: The room block is FULL, so the negotiated rate is no longer available. However, rooms are still available at a higher rate. Please call the Limelight directly to request the current rate. Make a Reservation: Please email [email protected] or call 800-433-0832. The Gant Condominium Resort Website: http://www.gantaspen.com/ Address: 610 S W End St., Aspen, CO 81611 Negotiated Rates: One Bedroom Condo/One Bath $295 Two Bedroom Condo /Two Bath $395 One Bedroom Condo/One Bath Premier $355 Two Bedroom Condo /Two Bath Premier $395 Three Bedroom Condo /Three Bath Premier $645 Make a Reservation: Please call The Resort Reservations Department at 1-800-345-1471 and reference the “Aspen Institute Children’s Forum” to book a room.
    [Show full text]
  • Tha American J L.IH ~~ UI!J I!J, Louis Inoersoii, SEC.·M.IS
    ASPEN HISTOrliC/\L SOCIETY )Cfi3 ACCESSION NO. ....4..~.,.~.t..: ...1. ~,J11to n" C FflAIlK KIRCIlIJOF, PIlESln::::l i"l~qvnl"1I'11lI • I11l c. F. STAlll, VICE·PRESIOEIIT Tha American J l.IH ~~ UI!J I!J, lOUIS InOERSOII, SEC.·m.IS. MANUFACTURERS OF BANK, OFFICE, STORE AND BAR FIXTURES TEl. UAiR 59. OFFICE & FACTORI: 1232-46 ARAPAHOE ST., DENVER, COLO. ASP1<lN 138 ASPgN --~----------- Lewis H. 'l'omldlls, Prost. F. M. Yates, Seq Henry H. Tomkins, V·Prest. W. R. Foutz, 'I'rc!ts. The Lewis H. Tomkins IRON ANO STEEL Hau'rl!w3.ll'e Co. OILS AND GLASS Stoves and 'rinware. Powder, Fuse, Caps and Candles. 'rin an~ Sheet Iron Work. Fire Arms and Ammunition. Aspen Colorado ---'-------~._~------~--_._---. ASPEN PlUM~~~J~ Co. ~1~UTM:1~,~:~~A~~,:'N~ James C. Johnsen. Mgr. JOBBING PROMPTLY ATTENDED All Goods Pertaining to the 'llrade. Estimates given free. PIPE AND FITTINGS .. _1~~South Mill St. __ .__Phone 40~~e_~___~sJlell,-c,o~0l'adG Aspen Bottling Works, Hawkins Bonnell & Andiu, groceries. & Bascom props. Bourquin A.mos, mining and iT; ASPOl} Commcl'eiaJ Club, Cllas vestments. Daily Sec. Boyer J.1ce' C, express. i\SPEN (JOMMISSION CO, Henry Breach A, shoemaker. lToltheer prop. BROWN DR C, pres Aspen Stall Aspen Democrat. '!'imcH (w), Chas Bank. Daily mgr. Brown IJ A VY, real estate. Aspen Drug Co, W K Hanson prop Bruin AIrs P, millinery. Aspen F'nel Co, D 1~ Hughes mgI'. 13n1't Housc, lVII's Fanny Hnff pro; Aspen Novelty Wad,", Ben Black· Byron J A, hakery, grocer.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of a Full-Time Ride Service Program
    0 U.S. Department of Transportation National Highway Traffic Safety People Saving People Administration www.nhtsa.dot.gov Evaluation of a Full-Time Ride Service Program: Aspen, Colorado's Tipsy Taxi Service * DOT HS 8og i 55 October 2000 * Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. DOT HS 809 155 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date October 2000 Evaluation of a Full-Time Ride Service Program: Aspen, Colorado's Tipsy Taxi Service 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Lacey, J. H.; Jones, R. K.; and Anderson, E. W. 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Mid-America Research Institute 611 Main Street Winchester, MA 01890 11. Contract or Grant No. DTN H22-93-C-05127 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Final Report Office of Research and Traffic Records 400 7"Street, S. W. 14. Sponsoring Agency Code Washington, DC 20590 15. Supplementary Notes Amy Berning was the Contracting Officer's Technical Representative (COTR) for this project. 16. Abstract This report summarizes a study of Aspen Colorado's Tipsy Taxi ride service program. This service, which provides a free ride home for persons who are too intoxicated to drive, has been in place since December 1983. Funded through donations from the community, this program is available 365 days a year, 24 hours per day. The program is distinctive in that it has been operating for over sixteen years and is self-sustaining.
    [Show full text]
  • Destinationcolorado.Com 2019 Official Statewide Meeting Planner Guide
    COLORADO 2019 Official Statewide Meeting Planner Guide DESTINATION COLORADO PARTNERS: destinationcolorado.com destinationcolorado.com WELCOME WELCOME DESTINATION COLORADO DESTINATION COLORADO Steamboat Springs Fort Collins Estes Loveland Park Greeley Longmont Northeast FRONT RANGE REGION: Northwest Granby Boulder Front Visit www.destinationcolorado.com for more information on all of our members. Winter Park Range BLACK HAWK, BOULDER, ESTES Beaver Black Hawk Keystone Colorado is a paradise for meeting planners and incentive buyers, combining the most magnificent PARK, FORT COLLINS, GREELEY, Creek Vail Golden Aurora Glenwood Springs Breckenridge Denver Copper Mtn natural beauty in the world with first-class accommodations, state-of-the-art meeting space LONGMONT, LOVELAND Snowmass Palisade Denver North of Denver, this region combines some Aspen and convenient access. We have organized our 2019 Meeting Planner Guide into state regions, Grand Buena Vista Colorado of Colorado’s finest college communities with Junction Crested Butte Springs beginning with our Front Range just north of Denver and ending with information on transportation Gateway Salida some of its most spectacular scenery. Boulder, Pueblo in the state. We have included a map illustrating each of our regions and a brief descriptor of some Fort Collins and Greeley, home to the state’s of the features they represent. Rest assured, no matter where you plan your meeting in Colorado, finest public universities, also offer charming Southwest South all of our members can provide you with the type of quality and services you have grown to expect. communities with an abundance of meeting space, Central dining, accommodations and activities. Estes Park Telluride Southeast Colorado is located in the western half of the United States and is easily accessible from both is situated in one of the state’s most spectacular backdrops, Rocky Mountain National Park, while Durango coasts.
    [Show full text]
  • Vv\ / «£C&V$> VA Piiliiiitiniffl^
    f STATE: Form 10-300 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR (Rev. 6-72) NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Colorado COUNTY: NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES Pitkin INVENTORY - NOMINATION FORM FOR NPS USE ONLY ENTRY DATE (Type all entries complete applicable sections) 3SAY 1 2 1975 C OMMON : ^ *^ \"i^Lj / ''^v ASPEN COMMUNITY CHURCH , ^ ^ .,; ^ X\)> "^^<^y\ AND/OR HISTORIC: vV\ FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH / «£C&V$> VA !1;:^lf^lli;lil^^ STREET AND NUMBER: 200 NORTH ASPEN STREET CITY OR TOWN: CON GRESSION^L DISTRICT: mMAV- A1"- ASPEN STATE CQDE COU ^ NTY: ''"•. ;<CVpEi » COLORADO U8 P ITKIN x ... ; ., ^^^i £/$&£ :- :;•':;;, :: 1 £. l: « '^'^ V ' ! : ^, I ?' • '• '& Hiii:H$$l| ':'-. :-\'<-:'^'-\:''<'-''^'<'<'-:' ^ STATUS ACCESSIBLE uo CATEGORY OWNERSHIP (Check One) TO THE PUBLIC Z [ | District ra Building CD Public Public Acquisition: 53 Occupied Yes: O .. , Fl Restricted G Site Q Structure H Private Q ln Process D Unoccupied dered r— i D • i CD Unrestricted n object n B°th n Bein9 c°ns UBFBU u Preservation work — 1- in progress 1 — 1 u PRESENT USE (Check One or More as Appropriate) ID \ | Agricultural [ | Government [~1 Park I | Transportation CD Comments O£ |~1 Commercial CD Industrial [~1 Private Residence Fl Other (Specifv) 1- CD Educational CD Military J£] Religious oo | 1 Entertainment 1 1 Museum [ | Scientific z |ll|i|ii;|?::iiiP;R:iF>|.i?iT Y :. :'• i; • f . : f| i:i :• •'. 3i:' vP;: . '•; •• ; i : ••"' ; ?f p -ill. •• •:";ll!||| OWNER'S NAME: STATE' Rocky Mountain Conference of United Methodist Church Colorado 1LI STREET AND NUMBER: LU U)
    [Show full text]
  • First Presbyterian Church State Register Nomination, 5PE.489 (PDF)
    OAHP1414 (Rev. 1/2005) COLORADO HISTORICAL SOCIETY COLORADO STATE REGISTER OF HISTORIC PROPERTIES NOMINATION FORM SECTION I Name of Property Historic Name First Presbyterian Church Other Names N/A Address of Property address not for publication Street Address 220 West 10th Street City Pueblo County Pueblo Zip 81003 Present Owner of Property (for multiple ownership, list the names and addresses of each owner on one or more continuation sheets) Name First Presbyterian Church Address 220 West 10th Street Phone City Pueblo State Colorado Zip 81003 Owner Consent for Nomination (attach signed consent from each owner of property - see attached form) Preparer of Nomination Name Rev. William B. Munroe Date 2/19/2007 Organization First Presbyterian Church Address 220 West 10th Street Phone City Pueblo State Colorado Zip 81003 FOR OFFICIAL USE: Site Number 5PE489 2/23/07 Nomination Received Senate # House # 5/11/2007 Review Board Recommendation 5/31/2007 CHS Board State Register Listing Approval Denial Approved Denied Listing Criteria A B C D E Certification of Listing: President, Colorado Historical Society Date COLORADO STATE REGISTER OF HISTORIC PROPERTIES Property Name First Presbyterian Church SECTION II Local Historic Designation Has the property received local historic designation? [ X ] no [ ] yes --- [ ]individually designated [ ] designated as part of a historic district Date designated Designated by (Name of municipality or county) Use of Property Historic Religion / religious facility Current Religion / religious facility Original Owner Presbytery of Colorado Source of Information The Skyline Synod: Presbyterianism in Colorado and Utah by Andrew Murray Year of Construction 1889-1890 with 1926 addition Source of Information Church records, newspaper accounts Architect, Builder, Engineer, Artist or Designer Frederic A.
    [Show full text]
  • Pitkin County Hazard Mitigation Plan 2018
    Pitkin County Hazard Mitigation Plan 2018 2018 Pitkin County Hazard Mitigation Plan Pitkin County Hazard Mitigation Plan April 2, 2018 1 2018 Pitkin County Hazard Mitigation Plan Table of Contents Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................... 6 Chapter One: Introduction to Hazard Mitigation Planning ............................................................. 9 1.1 Purpose .................................................................................................................................. 9 1.2 Participating Jurisdictions ...................................................................................................... 9 1.3 Background and Scope .......................................................................................................... 9 1.4 Mitigation Planning Requirements ...................................................................................... 10 1.5 Grant Programs Requiring Hazard Mitigation Plans............................................................ 10 1.6 Plan Organization ................................................................................................................ 11 Chapter Two: Planning Process ..................................................................................................... 13 2.1 2017 Plan Update Process ................................................................................................... 13 2.2 Multi-Jurisdictional Participation
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Assessment for the Establishment of Low Altitude Training for Cannon AFB, New Mexico
    Environmental Assessment for the Establishment of Low Altitude Training for Cannon AFB, New Mexico Public comments on this Draft EA are requested pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act, 42 USC 4321, et seq. All written comments received during the comment period would be made available to the public and considered during Final EA preparation. The provision of private address information with your comment is voluntary and would not be released for any other purpose unless required by law. However, this information is used to compile the project mailing list and failure to provide it would result in your name not being included on the mailing list. August 2011 DRAFT FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT (FONSI) INTRODUCTION -The Air Force is interested in obtaining public and agency comments on this revised proposal to designate a low altitude training area for training Air Force Special Operations Command (AFSOC) aircrews. This Draft FONSI is provided as part of the attached Environmental Assessment for public and agency review. NAME OF PROPOSED ACTION - Establishment of Low Altitude Training for Cannon AFB, New Mexico. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED ACTION AND NO ACTION ALTERNATIVE - The United States Air Force (Air Force) proposes to designate a low altitude training area in northern New Mexico and southern Colorado where 27 Special Operations Wing (27 SOW) aircrews operating from Cannon AFB would train for worldwide operations under their global response commitment. Cannon AFB based MC-130J and CV-22 aircraft rely on darkness, terrain, and low altitude to provide masking during missions. 27 SOW aircrews are required to maintain flight proficiency in varying terrain including mountainous terrain, varying threat levels, different climatic conditions, and low altitude after dark missions to support Special Operations Forces.
    [Show full text]