For Ghana (2011‐2016)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

For Ghana (2011‐2016) 1 SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT ACTION PLAN (SDAP) “SECURING THE FUTURE FOR THE NEXT GENERATION OF GHANAIANS” NATIONAL PROGRAMME ON SUSTAINTABLE CONSUMPTION AND PRODUCTION (SCP) FOR GHANA (2011‐2016) VOLUME 1 FINAL REPORT ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY IN COLLABORATION WITH UNEP NOVEMBER 2010 With support from UNEP and NREG (Natural Resources and Environmental Governance Programme) ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Special Thanks to: Dr. Desta Membratu – UNEP Paris France Mr. Lue Reuter – UNEP, Paris France – Resource Person Dr. Partick Mwesigye UNEP – Regional Office for Africa, Nairobi Kenya Project Directors Mr. Jonathan A. Allotey, Executive Director, EPA Mr. Daniel S. Amlalo – Deputy Executive Director, EPA Project Co‐ordinators/Secretarial Support Mrs. Sally Biney Mrs. Stella Okoh‐Ofosu Mrs. Marian Maud Dappa Chairpersons of Working Groups Prof. Newton Ameghey (Mining), Mr. Francis Ohemeng (Agriculture),Mr. Robert Tandoh (Manufacturing), Mr. Kofi Asante (Energy), Dr. John Idan (Waste Management), Mr. Frederick Amu‐Mensah (Water and Sanitation), Mrs. Cindy Badoe (Toursim), Patrick Addai (Economic Instrument), Mr. Sebastian Jerry Ackotia (Consumer Behaviour), Mr. Samuel Anku (Human Settlement, Housing and Construction), Mr. John Pwamang (Chemicals), Mr. Emmanuel Salu (Research and Education), Mr. Ebenezer Appah‐Sampong (Transportation) Mr. K. S. Nketiah (Forestry and Wildlife) Members of Working Groups Mining ‐ Emmanuel Afreh, Nana Andoh, Prof. Newton Ameghey, Mr. Ransford Sekyi, Mr. Isaac Oduro Agriculture ‐ Ms. Bernice Addo, Dr. Julius Nukpezah, Dr. Agyemang Dwomoh, Dr. Charles Domozoro, Mr. Francis Ohemeng, Ms. Elizabeth K.Parkes, Ms. Florence Agyei, Mr. Stephen Osei‐Amakye Manufacturing ‐ Mr. Robert Tandor, Mr. Yaw Sarfo Afriyie, Mrs. Esi Nerquaye‐Tetteh, Mr. Francis Boateng Asomaning, Mr. Philip Acquah, Mr. Saeed Foroco, Dr. Dominic Quainoo 2 Energy ‐ Mr. Kofi Asante, Emmanuel M. K. Amekor, Mr. Martin Kodjo, Mr. Prince O. Agyemang, Mrs. Selina Amoah Waste Management ‐ Mr. William Hayfron‐Acquah, Mr. Samuel Kpodo, Mr. John Afari Idan, Prince Antwi Agyei, Mawuena Aggrey Water and Sanitation ‐ Mr. Frederick Amu‐Mensah, Ronald Abrahams, Mr. Patrick Apoya, Carl Mensah Nyonator, Ms. Safuratu Andawi, Funke Cofie, Ms. Irene Opoku ‐ Tourism Mr. Frank Kofiga, Mr.Godfrey Tamakloe, Ms. Cindy Badoe, Mr. Seth Asare, Gordon Adoboe Economic Instrument ‐ Zakaria Issalaka , Mr. Alex Moyem Komba, Mr. Patrick Addai, Mr. Kwasi Achempong. Consumer Behaviour ‐ Mr. Sebastian Jerry Ackotia, Mr. Mustapha Tawiah Kumah, Mr. Henry Nii Odai , Mr. Daniel Aggrey. Human Settlement, Housing and Construction ‐ Mr. Samuel Anku, Mr. George Doku, Ghana Institute of Planners, Mrs. Theresa Tuffour Chemicals ‐ Mr. John Pwamang, Mr. Paul Osei‐Fosu, Mr. Ernest Osei‐Assibey, Dr. Shiloh Osae, Ms. Faustina Atupra, Dr. Louis Doamekpor Research and Education ‐ Dr. Nelson Obirih‐Opareh, Mr. Emmanuel Newman, Dr.Emmanuel Morgan Attua, Dr. Frederick Ocansey, Mr. Emmanuel Salu, Transportation ‐ Capt. Asmako‐Owiredu, Mr. Ebenezer Appah Sampong, Mr. George Ackom, Mr. William G. Agyare, Forestry and Wildlife – Mr. Oppong Sasu, Dr. Luke Anglaacere, Mr. George Baryeh. 3 Table of content ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ........................................................................................ Error! Bookmark not defined. List of Abbreviations .......................................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. CHAPTER I .......................................................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. NATIONAL PROGRAMME ON SUSTAINABLE CONSUMPTION AND PRODUCTION (SCP) – 2011‐2016 ..... Error! Bookmark not defined. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. Error! Bookmark not defined. 1.1 Background ........................................................................................ Error! Bookmark not defined. Road Map for the preparation of sustainable development action plan (SDAP) for Ghana ............ Error! Bookmark not defined. Introduction ............................................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. Overview of Sustainable Consumption Issues in National Policies, Plans and Programmes............ Error! Bookmark not defined. What is Sustainable Consumption and Production? ................................. Error! Bookmark not defined. Sustainable Production .............................................................................. Error! Bookmark not defined. Sustainable Consumption .......................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. Priority areas on energy ............................................................................. Error! Bookmark not defined. Priority areas on water and sanitation ...................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. Priority areas habit and sustainable urban development ......................... Error! Bookmark not defined. Priority areas on industrial development .................................................. Error! Bookmark not defined. Purpose and Benefits of SCP Programme .................................................. Error! Bookmark not defined. The key element of SCP is that it is: ........................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. The key principles are: ............................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. SCP is .......................................................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. Strategic Priorities of the SCP Programme ................................................ Error! Bookmark not defined. 4 Methodology and Reports Production ...................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. CHAPTER II ......................................................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. OVERVIEW OF HOUSEHOLD CONSUMPTION PATTERNS ................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. Poverty Trends ............................................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. Household Assets ........................................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. Access to Services .......................................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. Human Development ..................................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. Household Patterns – Living Conditions of Households ................................ Error! Bookmark not defined. Demography ................................................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. Employment ................................................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. Migration and Tourism .................................................................................. Error! Bookmark not defined. Housing .......................................................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. Non‐Farm Enterprises .................................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. Household Expenditure ................................................................................. Error! Bookmark not defined. Table 8: Average annual household cash expenditure by locality and expenditure group . Error! Bookmark not defined. Table 10: Proportion of households owning various assets and consumer durables by locality (percent) ........................................................................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. Household Income ......................................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. Agricultural Inputs .......................................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. CHAPTER III ........................................................................................................ Error! Bookmark not defined. STATUS OF CONSUMPTION AND PRODUCTION PATTERNS .............................. Error! Bookmark not defined. Energy ............................................................................................................ Error! Bookmark not defined. Land use and Crop production ....................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. Land area and production patterns ............................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. Production and supply pattern of food crops ................................................ Error! Bookmark not defined. 5 Table 15 Quantity and Value of Cereal Imports (1999 – 2007) ..................... Error! Bookmark not defined. Seed Cotton2 ...................................................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. Livestock Sub‐sector ...................................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. Soils as supply component of the production
Recommended publications
  • Biogas Current Biofuels
    Current Biofuels - Biogas Keywords Bioenergy, biofuel, biogas, sustainable, renewable, biomass, anaerobic, waste, bacteria, microbes, fermentation, methane. Background Biofuel feedstocks that have high water content, such as food wastes and livestock manure cannot be easily incinerated, but can produce biogas. Biogas can be burnt to produce heat for cooking, warming homes and producing electricity. It can also be compressed and used as a transport fuel in specially © istockphoto® converted vehicle engines. The digested residue is of use as fertiliser in agriculture. Biogas storage containers Biogas is 60-80% methane and is created by a process termed anaerobic digestion, leaving behind a nutrient- rich substance termed digestate. Anaerobic digestion is carried out by a range of bacteria in the absence of oxygen. A number of bacteria and yeast have been identified in biogas production. Initially carbon dioxide is produced by the decomposing organic matter until an anaerobic environment is created. After the initial digestion a group of bacteria known as methanogens convert the products into methane and carbon dioxide. Anaerobic digestion has a number of environmental benefits including production of ‘green energy and natural fertilisers. The production of biogas can substitute feedstocks for fossil fuels and artificial fertilisers, reducing the amount of greenhouse gases released into the atmosphere. The problems associated with waste disposal are also alleviated by the generation of useful products and decreased release of the potent greenhouse gas, methane, from landfill sites Biogas is successfully generated in a number of developing countries and Europe. In the UK, research is being conducted in a number of areas of biogas production including: • Assessment of how more automated production can be achieved and scaled up to make it efficient and cost e fective.
    [Show full text]
  • Expanding the Use of Biogas with Fuel Cell Technologies
    Expanding the Use of Biogas with Fuel Cell Technologies Biogas with Fuel Cells Workshop Sunita Satyapal National Renewable Energy Laboratory U.S. Department of Energy Golden, Colorado Fuel Cell Technologies Program Program Manager 6/11/2012 1 eere.energy.gov U.S. Energy Consumption U.S. Primary Energy Consumption by Source and Sector Renewable Electric Power Energy 8% Fuel Cells can apply to diverse Nuclear Industrial sectors Energy 9% Share of Energy Consumed Petroleum 37% by Major Sectors of the Economy, 2010 Residential & Commercial Coal 21% Residential 16% Transportation Natural Gas Electric Power 25% 29% Commercial 13% Transportation 20% Total U.S. Energy = 98 Quadrillion Btu/yr Industrial 22% Source: Energy Information Administration, Annual Energy Review 2010, Table 1.3 2 eere.energy.gov Fuel Cells – An Emerging Global Industry Fuel Cell Patents Geographic Source: Clean Distribution 2002-2011 Energy Patent Growth Index Japan 31% United States 46% Other 3% Clean Energy Patent Growth Index France 1% Korea Great Taiwan 7% Top 10 companies: GM, Honda, Samsung, Britain 1% 1% Toyota, UTC Power, Nissan, Ballard, Plug Canada Germany Power, Panasonic, Delphi Technologies 3% 7% Clean Energy Patent Growth Index[1] shows that fuel cell patents lead in the clean energy field with over 950 fuel cell patents issued in 2011. • Nearly double the second place holder, solar, which has ~540 patents. [1] http://cepgi.typepad.com/files/cepgi-4th-quarter-2011-1.pdf 3 eere.energy.gov Fuel Cells: Benefits & Market Potential The Role of Fuel Cells Key Benefits • up to 60% (electrical) Very High • up to 70% (electrical, hybrid fuel cell / Efficiency turbine) • up to 85% (with CHP) • 35–50%+ reductions for CHP systems Reduced (>80% with biogas) CO2 • 55–90% reductions for light-duty vehicles Emissions /Biogas • >95% reduction for FCEVs (vs.
    [Show full text]
  • WHY BIOGAS? Biogas Systems Protect Our Air, Water and Soil While Recycling Organic Material to Produce Renewable Energy and Soil Products
    WHY BIOGAS? Biogas systems protect our air, water and soil while recycling organic material to produce renewable energy and soil products. In cities, biogas systems recycle food scraps and wastewater sludge, reducing municipal costs and avoiding transport to disposal sites. In rural areas, biogas systems make agriculture more sustainable and create additional revenue streams for farmers. Since biogas systems prevent greenhouse gases, like methane, from entering the atmosphere, all biogas systems make our air cleaner to breathe and combat climate change, displacing fossil fuels. Biogas systems produce soil products that recycle nutrients, contributing to healthier soils 1211 Connecticut Avenue NW, Suite 650 and creating opportunities to eliminate nutrient runoff that pollutes our waterways. Waste management, renewable Washington, DC 20036-2701 energy and fuels, clean air, healthy soils and crystal clear waterways—you can get all of this when you build a new 202-640-6595 biogas system. [email protected] Use the interactive map at https://americanbiogascouncil.org/resources/biogas-projects/ Operational U.S. Biogas Systems The U.S. has over 2,200 sites producing biogas in all 50 states: 253 anaerobic digesters on farms, 1,269 water resource recovery facilities utilizing anaerobic 101 digesters, 68 stand-alone systems that digest food waste, and 652 landfill gas projects. For comparison, Europe has over Alaska 10,000 operating digesters, with some communities essentially fossil fuel free because of these systems. In 2018, investment in new biogas systems Puerto Rico totaled $1 billion. Over the last five years, total investment in the U.S. biogas industry has been growing at an annual rate of 12%.
    [Show full text]
  • Fuel Properties Comparison
    Alternative Fuels Data Center Fuel Properties Comparison Compressed Liquefied Low Sulfur Gasoline/E10 Biodiesel Propane (LPG) Natural Gas Natural Gas Ethanol/E100 Methanol Hydrogen Electricity Diesel (CNG) (LNG) Chemical C4 to C12 and C8 to C25 Methyl esters of C3H8 (majority) CH4 (majority), CH4 same as CNG CH3CH2OH CH3OH H2 N/A Structure [1] Ethanol ≤ to C12 to C22 fatty acids and C4H10 C2H6 and inert with inert gasses 10% (minority) gases <0.5% (a) Fuel Material Crude Oil Crude Oil Fats and oils from A by-product of Underground Underground Corn, grains, or Natural gas, coal, Natural gas, Natural gas, coal, (feedstocks) sources such as petroleum reserves and reserves and agricultural waste or woody biomass methanol, and nuclear, wind, soybeans, waste refining or renewable renewable (cellulose) electrolysis of hydro, solar, and cooking oil, animal natural gas biogas biogas water small percentages fats, and rapeseed processing of geothermal and biomass Gasoline or 1 gal = 1.00 1 gal = 1.12 B100 1 gal = 0.74 GGE 1 lb. = 0.18 GGE 1 lb. = 0.19 GGE 1 gal = 0.67 GGE 1 gal = 0.50 GGE 1 lb. = 0.45 1 kWh = 0.030 Diesel Gallon GGE GGE 1 gal = 1.05 GGE 1 gal = 0.66 DGE 1 lb. = 0.16 DGE 1 lb. = 0.17 DGE 1 gal = 0.59 DGE 1 gal = 0.45 DGE GGE GGE Equivalent 1 gal = 0.88 1 gal = 1.00 1 gal = 0.93 DGE 1 lb. = 0.40 1 kWh = 0.027 (GGE or DGE) DGE DGE B20 DGE DGE 1 gal = 1.11 GGE 1 kg = 1 GGE 1 gal = 0.99 DGE 1 kg = 0.9 DGE Energy 1 gallon of 1 gallon of 1 gallon of B100 1 gallon of 5.66 lb., or 5.37 lb.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report Study on the Potential of Increased Use of LPG for Cooking in Developing Countries
    Final Report Study on the Potential of Increased Use of LPG for Cooking in Developing Countries September 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................................................... 2 List of Abbreviations ...................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Preface .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 1 Introduction.......................................................................................................................................................................... 8 1.1 General ................................................................................................................................................................................. 8 1.2 Background ........................................................................................................................................................................... 8 2 Purpose and Scope of the Study ............................................................................................................................................ 9 2.1 Purpose of the Study ...........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Process Technologies and Projects for Biolpg
    energies Review Process Technologies and Projects for BioLPG Eric Johnson Atlantic Consulting, 8136 Gattikon, Switzerland; [email protected]; Tel.: +41-44-772-1079 Received: 8 December 2018; Accepted: 9 January 2019; Published: 15 January 2019 Abstract: Liquified petroleum gas (LPG)—currently consumed at some 300 million tonnes per year—consists of propane, butane, or a mixture of the two. Most of the world’s LPG is fossil, but recently, BioLPG has been commercialized as well. This paper reviews all possible synthesis routes to BioLPG: conventional chemical processes, biological processes, advanced chemical processes, and other. Processes are described, and projects are documented as of early 2018. The paper was compiled through an extensive literature review and a series of interviews with participants and stakeholders. Only one process is already commercial: hydrotreatment of bio-oils. Another, fermentation of sugars, has reached demonstration scale. The process with the largest potential for volume is gaseous conversion and synthesis of two feedstocks, cellulosics or organic wastes. In most cases, BioLPG is produced as a byproduct, i.e., a minor output of a multi-product process. BioLPG’s proportion of output varies according to detailed process design: for example, the advanced chemical processes can produce BioLPG at anywhere from 0–10% of output. All these processes and projects will be of interest to researchers, developers and LPG producers/marketers. Keywords: Liquified petroleum gas (LPG); BioLPG; biofuels; process technologies; alternative fuels 1. Introduction Liquified petroleum gas (LPG) is a major fuel for heating and transport, with a current global market of around 300 million tonnes per year.
    [Show full text]
  • Biogas As a Transport Fuel—A System Analysis of Value Chain Development in a Swedish Context
    sustainability Article Biogas as a Transport Fuel—A System Analysis of Value Chain Development in a Swedish Context Muhammad Arfan *, Zhao Wang, Shveta Soam and Ola Eriksson Department of Building Engineering, Energy Systems and Sustainability Science, University of Gävle, SE-801 76 Gävle, Sweden; [email protected] (Z.W.); [email protected] (S.S.); [email protected] (O.E.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +46-704-400-593 Abstract: Biofuels policy instruments are important in the development and diffusion of biogas as a transport fuel in Sweden. Their effectiveness with links to geodemographic conditions has not been analysed systematically in studying biogas development in a less urbanised regions, with high po- tential and primitive gas infrastructure. One such region identified is Gävleborg in Sweden. By using value chain statistics, interviews with related actors, and studying biofuels policy instruments and implications for biogas development, it is found that the policy measures have not been as effective in the region as in the rest of Sweden due to different geodemographic characteristics of the region, which has resulted in impeded biogas development. In addition to factors found in previous studies, the less-developed biogas value chain in this region can be attributed particularly to undefined rules of the game, which is lack of consensus on trade-off of resources and services, unnecessary competition among several fuel alternatives, as well as the ambiguity of municipalities’ prioritization, and regional cultural differences. To strengthen the regional biogas sector, system actors need a strategy to eliminate blocking effects of identified local factors, and national policy instruments should provide mechanisms to process geographical conditions in regulatory, economic support, Citation: Arfan, M.; Wang, Z.; Soam, and market formation.
    [Show full text]
  • ACEA Tax Guide 2018.Pdf
    2018 WWW.ACEA.BE Foreword The 2018 edition of the European Automobile Manufacturers’ Association’s annual Tax Guide provides an overview of specific taxes that are levied on motor vehicles in European countries, as well as in other key markets around the world. This comprehensive guide counts more than 300 pages, making it an indispensable tool for anyone interested in the European automotive industry and relevant policies. The 2018 Tax Guide contains all the latest information about taxes on vehicle acquisition (VAT, sales tax, registration tax), taxes on vehicle ownership (annual circulation tax, road tax) and taxes on motoring (fuel tax). Besides the 28 member states of the European Union, as well as the EFTA countries (Iceland, Norway and Switzerland), this Tax Guide also covers countries such as Brazil, China, India, Japan, Russia, South Korea, Turkey and the United States. The Tax Guide is compiled with the help of the national associations of motor vehicle manufacturers in all these countries. I would like to extend our sincere gratitude to all involved for making the latest information available for this publication. Erik Jonnaert ACEA Secretary General Copyright Reproduction of the content of this document is not permitted without the prior written consent of ACEA. Whenever reproduction is permitted, ACEA shall be referred to as source of the information. Summary EU member countries 5 EFTA 245 Other countries 254 EU member states EU summary tables 5 Austria 10 Belgium 19 Bulgaria 42 Croatia 48 Cyprus 52 Czech Republic 55 Denmark 65 Estonia 79 Finland 82 France 88 Germany 100 Greece 108 Hungary 119 Ireland 125 Italy 137 Latvia 148 Lithuania 154 Luxembourg 158 Malta 168 Netherlands 171 Poland 179 Portugal 184 Romania 194 Slovakia 198 Slovenia 211 Spain 215 Sweden 224 United Kingdom 234 01 EU summary tables Chapter prepared by Francesca Piazza [email protected] ACEA European Automobile Manufacturers’ Association Avenue des Nerviens 85 B — 1040 Brussels T.
    [Show full text]
  • Multinational Commission
    AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT FUND LANGUAGE : ENGLISH ORIGINAL : FRENCH APPRAISAL REPORT ROAD PROGRAMME 1 UEMOA/GHANA MULTINATIONAL COMMISSION DEPARTMENT OF INFRASTRUCTURE OCIN CENTRAL AND WEST REGIONS AUGUST 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS Pages PROGRAMME INFORMATION SHEET, CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS, ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS, LISTS OF ANNEXES AND TABLES, BASIC DATA, PROGRAMME LOGICAL FRAMEWORK, EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.......................... i to - xi 1 INTRODUCTION .........................................................................................................1 1.1 Programme Origin and Background................................................................................1 2 THE TRANSPORT SECTOR ......................................................................................2 2.1 Generalities ...................................................................................................................2 2.2 Sectoral Overview.........................................................................................................2 2.3 Transport Policy, Planning and Co-ordination...................................................................5 3 THE ROAD SUB-SECTOR..........................................................................................5 3.1 The Road Network........................................................................................................5 3.2 Vehicle Fleet and Traffic ...............................................................................................6 3.3 Road Transport Industry................................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Final JAR 2007 24-10-2008
    October 2007 2007 JOINT ANNUAL REPORT EU – GHANA COOPERATION European Commission National Authorising Officer 0 ACRONYMS ACP Africa Caribbean and Pacific AFD Agence Francaise de Development APRM African Peer Review Mechanism ART Antiretroviral therapy AU African Union BPEMS Budget and Expenditure Management System CAN African Nations Cup CEA Country Enrolment Assessment / Country Environmental Assessment CHPS Community Health Planning and Services CISP Cultural Initiatives Support Programme CPI Corruption Perception Index CSP Country Strategy Programme CWIQ Core Welfare Indicator Questionnaire DACF District Assembly Common Fund DFID Department for International Development DOC District Oversight Committee DPs Development Partners EC European Commission ECOWAS Economic Community of West African States EDF European Development Fund EIDRH European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights EMMSDAG Establishment of Monitoring and Mapping System for Development Activities in Ghana EOT Extension of Time EPA Economic Partnership Agreements ESP Education Strategy Plan ETR End Term Review FA Financing Agreement FLEGT Forest law enforcement, governance and trade GDP Gross Domestic Product GER Gross Enrolment Ratios GFATM Global Fund to Fight Aids, Tuberculosis and Malaria GIS Geographic Information System / Ghana Immigration Service GLASOD Global Assessment of Human Induced Soil Degradation GoG Government of Ghana GPI Gender Parity Index GPRS Growth and Poverty Reduction Strategy GSS Ghana Statistical Service HIPC Highly Indebted Poor Countries
    [Show full text]
  • Biogas As Vehicle Fuel
    Biogas as Vehicle Fuel A European Overview October 2003, Stockholm Trendsetter Report No 2003:3 Biogas as Vehicle Fuel – a European Overview FOREWORD The spontaneous development of transport in Europe is not sustainable. To change this it is necessary to mobilise and present a carefully chosen combination of measures that cover several areas and involve various responsibilities in the cities rather than a list of isolated efforts. In other words, to have an integrated approach. The European project TRENDSETTER involves 50 individual projects, all of which aim to; improve mobility, quality of life, air quality, and reduce noise and traffic congestion. The cities of Stockholm, Lille, Graz, Prague and Pécs co-operate in the project to ensure real impact, by setting good examples and encouraging others to follow. More information is available at http://www.trendsetter-europe.org This report is produced within the framework of the Trendsetter project. It is a summary of European experiences of Biogas, with a focus on the use as a vehicle fuel. It highlights the lack of European legislation and regulation as a major barrier to the further development of biogas use, but also presents some examples of best practise and provides a guide for cities interested in producing and upgrading biogas. The report has been compiled by Charlotte Plombin, Engineering student at the Ecole des Mines d´Albi, France, as a part of her internship at Stockholm Environment Administration. Project Manager Björn Hugosson at Stockholm Environment Administration, supervised the work. Stockholm, October 2003 Gustaf Landahl Project Co-ordinator 3 Biogas as Vehicle Fuel – a European Overview SUMMARY This reports is a survey over biogas production and utilisation in the EU.
    [Show full text]
  • Wisconsin Administrative Code Index
    WISCONSIN ADMINISTRATIVE CODE INDEX This is an index of all rules published in the code as of July 1, 2021. Suggestions for the improvement of the index or reports of errors and omissions will be appreciated. ABORTIONS ADULT AND VOCATIONAL EDUCATION Environmental impact statements and assessments, Generally, Ch. Med 11 See Technical College System Ch. ATCP 3 Correspondence courses, for−profit schools, Safety Fairs, county and district, Ch. ATCP 160 ACCOUNTANTS AND ACCOUNTING and Professional Services Department — Farm mediation and arbitration program, Ch. ATCP Certification, individuals, Ch. Accy 2 Educational Approval 162 Endorsement, Ch. Accy 3 Farmland preservation program, Ch. ATCP 49 Licensure: ADVERTISING Farmland, soil and water resource management Firms, Ch. Accy 5 Auctions, Ch. SPS 123 program, grants, Ch. ATCP 50 Individuals, Accy 2.501 Direct marketing, Ch. ATCP 127 Fertilizer and pesticide bulk storage, Ch. ATCP 33 Peer review, Ch. Accy 6 Eggs, unfair practices, Ch. ATCP 88 Anhydrous ammonia, Ch. SPS 343 Rule enforcement, Ch. Accy 4 Employment, deceptive offers, Ch. ATCP 116 Groundwater protection program, Ch. ATCP 31 Rules of conduct, Ch. Accy 1 Gasoline, Ch. ATCP 113 Fish farms, ATCP 10.60 to 10.67 Home solicitation selling, Ch. ATCP 127 Food safety: ACUPUNCTURISTS Insurance, accident and sickness, deceptive practices, Egg grade, labeling and quality standards, Ch. Certification, Ch. SPS 71 Ins 3.27 ATCP 88 Discipline, grounds for, Ch. SPS 73 Motor vehicle dealer’s business sign, Trans 138.06 Food processing plants, Ch. ATCP 70 Practice, standards of, Ch. SPS 72 Outdoor, along federally funded highways, Ch. Trans Food warehouses and milk distributors, Ch.
    [Show full text]