DOCSLIB.ORG

Methods and Technical Summary

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Methods and Technical Summary 2016 Pilot Waikato River Report Card: Methods and Technical Summary Prepared for Waikato River Authority March 2016 2015 Pilot Waikato River Report Card: Methods and Technical Summary Prepared by : Bruce Williamson (Diffuse Sources) John Quinn (NIWA) Erica Williams (NIWA) Cheri van Schravendijk-Goodman (WRRT) For any information regarding this report please contact: National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research Ltd PO Box 11115 Hamilton 3251 Phone +64 7 856 7026 NIWA CLIENT REPORT No: HAM2016-011 Report date: March 2016 NIWA Project: WRA14203 Quality Assurance Statement Reviewed by: Dr Bob Wilcock Formatting checked by: Alison Bartley Approved for release by: Bryce Cooper Photo: Waikato River at Wellington Street Beach, Hamilton. [John Quinn, NIWA] 2015 Pilot Waikato River Report Card: Methods and Technical Summary Contents Summary ............................................................................................................................ 9 Reflections from the Project Team ..................................................................................... 12 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 18 1.1 Report Cards ........................................................................................................... 18 1.2 2015 Pilot Waikato River Report Cards .................................................................. 20 1.3 Purpose of this Technical Summary ........................................................................ 28 2 Experience ............................................................................................................... 29 2.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 29 2.1.1 Recreation Attributes of Water Bodies ................................................... 29 2.1.2 Amenity Values and Access ..................................................................... 29 2.1.3 Social and Recreational Values and Beliefs ............................................. 30 2.2 Scoring Experience .................................................................................................. 30 2.2.1 Physical Access ........................................................................................ 31 2.2.2 Navigation ............................................................................................... 33 2.2.3 Rubbish .................................................................................................... 35 2.2.4 Signage .................................................................................................... 38 2.2.5 Human Sewage Discharges ..................................................................... 40 2.2.6 Water Clarity (Black Disk and Secchi Disk Visibility) ................................ 43 2.2.7 E.coli ........................................................................................................ 44 2.2.8 Blue Green Algae ..................................................................................... 47 2.3 Experience Taura scoring ........................................................................................ 48 2.4 Other indicators considered but discarded ............................................................ 50 2.5 Future scoring ......................................................................................................... 50 3 Ecological Integrity ................................................................................................... 52 3.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 52 3.2 Scoring Ecological Integrity ..................................................................................... 52 3.2.1 Physico-chemical stressors ...................................................................... 52 3.2.2 Riparian Condition ................................................................................... 63 3.2.3 Aquatic Plants Lakes and Mainstem ........................................................ 73 3.2.5 Macroinvertebrates ................................................................................. 80 3.2.6 Fish .......................................................................................................... 82 3.2.7 Water Birds .............................................................................................. 85 3.2.8 Connectivity ............................................................................................. 90 2015 Pilot Waikato River Report Card: Methods and Technical Summary 3.3 Ecological Integrity Taura scores ............................................................................ 94 3.4 Other Indicators considered then discarded .......................................................... 95 3.5 Future Scoring ......................................................................................................... 95 4 Kai ........................................................................................................................... 98 4.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 98 4.2 Scoring Kai ............................................................................................................... 98 4.2.1 Tuna ......................................................................................................... 98 4.2.2 Whitebait ............................................................................................... 102 4.2.3 Kaaeo / Kākahi ....................................................................................... 106 4.2.4 Kōura ..................................................................................................... 108 4.2.5 Piharau .................................................................................................. 111 4.2.6 Trout ...................................................................................................... 113 4.2.7 Waterfowl .............................................................................................. 114 4.3 Kai Taura scores .................................................................................................... 115 4.4 Future Scoring ....................................................................................................... 116 5 Water Quality ........................................................................................................ 119 5.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................... 119 5.2 Scoring Water Quality ........................................................................................... 119 5.2.1 Nutrients ................................................................................................ 120 5.2.2 Chlorophyll ............................................................................................ 121 5.3 Water Quality Taura grades .................................................................................. 122 5.4 Water Quality Indicators considered but discarded or covered elsewhere ......... 123 5.5 Future Scoring ....................................................................................................... 124 6 Water Security ....................................................................................................... 125 6.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................... 125 6.2 Scoring Water Security ......................................................................................... 125 6.2.1 Water Abstraction and Use ................................................................... 125 6.2.2 Groundwater Allocation ........................................................................ 128 6.2.3 Rural Water Use .................................................................................... 129 6.2.4 Urban Water Use ................................................................................... 130 Scoring RCU for Urban Water Use ........................................................................ 132 6.2.5 Water Human Health and Safety .......................................................... 132 6.3 Water Security Taura Grade ................................................................................. 134 6.4 Water Security Indicators Considered but Discarded ........................................... 135 6.5 Future Scoring ....................................................................................................... 136 2015 Pilot Waikato River Report Card: Methods and Technical Summary 7 Effort ..................................................................................................................... 138 7.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................... 138 7.2 Scoring Effort ........................................................................................................ 139 7.2.1 Major Point Discharges ......................................................................... 139 7.2.2 Dairy Shed Consents .............................................................................. 139 7.2.3 Soil Conservation and Farm Plans ........................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Native Land Court, Land Titles and Crown Land Purchasing in the Rohe Potae District, 1866 ‐ 1907
    Wai 898 #A79 The Native Land Court, land titles and Crown land purchasing in the Rohe Potae district, 1866 ‐ 1907 A report for the Te Rohe Potae district inquiry (Wai 898) Paul Husbands James Stuart Mitchell November 2011 ii Contents Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 1 Report summary .................................................................................................................................. 1 The Statements of Claim ..................................................................................................................... 3 The report and the Te Rohe Potae district inquiry .............................................................................. 5 The research questions ........................................................................................................................ 6 Relationship to other reports in the casebook ..................................................................................... 8 The Native Land Court and previous Tribunal inquiries .................................................................. 10 Sources .............................................................................................................................................. 10 The report’s chapters ......................................................................................................................... 20 Terminology .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ōtorohanga District Council Initial Proposal for Representation Arrangements for the 2022 Local Elections
    Ōtorohanga District Council Initial proposal for representation arrangements for the 2022 local elections On 17 August 2021 the Ōtorohanga District Council reviewed its representation arrangements, pursuant to section 19H of the Local Electoral Act 2001, and resolved that the following proposal apply for the Council and Community Boards for the elections to be held on 8 October 2022: Council Representation It is proposed that the Council comprise 9 members elected from six wards, and the Mayor elected at- large. The six wards reflect the following identified communities of interest: Ward Communities of Interest Kāwhia/Tihiroa Ward The communities of Kawhia and Aotea together with, but not limited to, the rural areas of Oparau, Hauturu, Ngutunui, Tihiroa, Te Kawa and Honikiwi. Kio Kio/Korakonui Ward The area comprising, but not limited to, the rural areas of Kio Kio, Tokanui Crossroads, Korakonui and Ngahape. Ōtorohanga Ward The community of Ōtorohanga which covers the township of Ōtorohanga. Waipā Ward The area comprising, but not limited to, the rural areas of Rangiatea, Maihiihi, Paewhenua, Whawharua, Otewa and Rewa Rewa. Wharepuhunga Ward The area comprising, but not limited to, the rural areas of Waikeria, Wharepuhunga, Ngaroma, Arohena and Ranginui. Ōtorohanga Māori Ward A district wide ward that reflects the community of interest for Māori electors and those in the Māori community. The population that each member will represent is as follows: Wards Population* Members Population per % Deviation member from the average General Kāwhia/Tihiroa
    [Show full text]
  • Ecohydrological Characterisation of Whangamarino Wetland
    http://researchcommons.waikato.ac.nz/ Research Commons at the University of Waikato Copyright Statement: The digital copy of this thesis is protected by the Copyright Act 1994 (New Zealand). The thesis may be consulted by you, provided you comply with the provisions of the Act and the following conditions of use: Any use you make of these documents or images must be for research or private study purposes only, and you may not make them available to any other person. Authors control the copyright of their thesis. You will recognise the author’s right to be identified as the author of the thesis, and due acknowledgement will be made to the author where appropriate. You will obtain the author’s permission before publishing any material from the thesis. ECOHYDROLOGICAL CHARACTERISATION OF WHANGAMARINO WETLAND A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Masters of Science in Earth Sciences at The University of Waikato By JAMES MITCHELL BLYTH The University of Waikato 2011 Abstract The Whangamarino wetland is internationally recognised and one of the most important lowland wetland ecosystems in the Waikato Region. The wetland‟s hydrology has been altered by reduced river base levels, the installation of a weir to raise minimum water levels and the Lower Waikato Waipa Flood Control Scheme, which is linked via the (hypertrophic) Lake Waikare and affected by varying catchment land use practices. When water levels exceed capacity, the overflow is released into the Whangamarino wetland, which also receives flood waters from Whangamarino River. Water levels in the wetland are also affected at high stage, by a control structure near Meremere at the confluence of Waikato and Whangamarino Rivers, and at low stage by a weir a short distance upstream.
    [Show full text]
  • Rangiriri to Huntly — NZ Walking Access Commission Ara Hīkoi Aotearoa
    10/5/2021 Rangiriri to Huntly — NZ Walking Access Commission Ara Hīkoi Aotearoa Rangiriri to Huntly Walking Difculty Easy Length 21.4 km Journey Time 1 day Region Waikato Sub-Region North Waikato Part of Collections Te Araroa - New Zealand's Trail , Te Araroa - North Island Track maintained by Te Araroa Trail Trust https://www.walkingaccess.govt.nz/track/rangiriri-to-huntly/pdfPreview 1/4 10/5/2021 Rangiriri to Huntly — NZ Walking Access Commission Ara Hīkoi Aotearoa Once you've crossed the bridge, continue a further 150m around the rst corner and there is a stile to take you across the rst fence to this riverside track which runs parallel to Te Ōhākī Road. On a clear day, you'll see the orange-topped chimneys of the Huntly Power station standing in the distance. 1.5km in, past Maurea Marae, there's a monument to the Ngāti Naho chief, Te Wheoro, whose personal history embodies the extraordinary stresses of colonial rule on Waikato Māori as they argued strategies to preserve tribal identity. Te Wheoro sided at rst with the Crown. In 1857, he spoke against setting up a Māori king and, at the great conference of Māori leaders at Kohimarama in 1860, spoke again in favour of the Government. Governor Grey's British troops invaded Waikato territory in July 1863. In November that year, the British Troops overcame the Māori redoubt at Rangiriri, forcing the Māori King, Tāwhiao, out of Ngāruawāhia to sanctuary around Waitomo and Te Kūiti. In the years that followed, Te Wheoro acted as an intermediary for the Government's negotiation with the King.
    [Show full text]
  • Waikato District Council
    WAIKATO DISTRICT COUNCIL Report and Decisions of the Waikato District Plan Hearings Panel REPORT 2 Ohinewai Rezoning 24 May 2021 Commissioners Dr Phil Mitchell (Chair) Mr Paul Cooney (Deputy Chair) Mr Dynes Fulton Mr Weo Maag Page | 1 Decision Report 2: Ohinewai Rezoning Report and Decisions of the Waikato District Plan Hearings Panel Page | 2 Decision Report 2: Ohinewai Rezoning Report and Decisions of the Waikato District Plan Hearings Panel TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 5 2 The APL submission ...................................................................................................................... 9 3 Statutory and planning framework ............................................................................................ 15 4 Site suitability and physical characteristics ............................................................................... 18 5 Three Waters Infrastructure ...................................................................................................... 20 6 Natural hazards ........................................................................................................................... 24 7 Transport and traffic ................................................................................................................... 26 8 Economic effects .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Potential Shallow Seismic Sources in the Hamilton Basin Project 16/717 5 July 2017
    Final Report on EQC Potential shallow seismic sources in the Hamilton Basin Project 16/717 5 July 2017 Vicki Moon & Willem de Lange School of Science University of Waikato 1. Introduction Following the exposure of a fault within a cutting in a new sub-division development in NE Hamilton, an initial investigation suggested the presence of 4 fault zones within the Hamilton Basin (Figure 1) that represented a potential hazard to infrastructure within the Basin. Hence, the overall aim of the proposal put to EQC was to refine the locations of four potentially active faults within the Hamilton Basin. To achieve this aim, two main phases of geophysical surveying were planned: 1. A seismic reflection survey along the Waikato River channel; and 2. Resistivity surveying to examine the sub- surface structure of identified fault zones. Additional MSc student projects, funded by Waikato Regional Council, were proposed to map the surface geology and geomorphology, and assess the liquefaction potential within the Hamilton Basin. During the course of the project, the initial earthworks Figure 1: Map of the four fault zones that were initially identified from geomorphology for the Hamilton Section of the Waikato Expressway and surface fault exposures, as presented in provided exposures of faults, which resulted in some the original proposal. modification of the project. 2. Methods The two main methodological approaches planned for this project were: 1. A high resolution CHIRP seismic reflection survey along the Waikato River within the Hamilton Basin. A previous study examining the stability of the river banks in response to fluctuating water levels (Wood, 2006) had obtained detailed data on the morphology of the river bed using multi-beam and single-beam echo sounders (MBES and SBES respectively), and side scan sonar.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Pilot Waikato River Report Card: Methods and Technical Summary
    2016 Pilot Waikato River Report Card: Methods and Technical Summary Prepared for Waikato River Authority March 2016 2016 Pilot Waikato River Report Card: Methods and Technical Summary Prepared by: Bruce Williamson (Diffuse Sources) John Quinn (NIWA) Erica Williams (NIWA) Cheri van Schravendijk-Goodman (WRRT) For any information regarding this report please contact: National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research Ltd PO Box 11115 Hamilton 3251 Phone +64 7 856 7026 NIWA CLIENT REPORT No: HAM2016-011 Report date: March 2016 NIWA Project: WRA14203 Quality Assurance Statement Reviewed by: Dr Bob Wilcock Formatting checked by: Alison Bartley Approved for release by: Bryce Cooper Photo: Waikato River at Wellington Street Beach, Hamilton. [John Quinn, NIWA] 2016 Pilot Waikato River Report Card: Methods and Technical Summary Contents Summary ............................................................................................................................ 9 Reflections from the Project Team ..................................................................................... 12 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 18 1.1 Report Cards ........................................................................................................... 18 1.2 2015 Pilot Waikato River Report Cards .................................................................. 20 1.3 Purpose of this Technical Summary .......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • NZ Canoeing Bulletin
    Inside: Tongarlro, Walkato, Californian Rivers, Arnold ... ----------------------~ New Zealand oo.2 Canoeing Canoeist of the Year Spring 2000 Hugh Canard, Patron Contents Ron Wastney was multi spotters. His name appeared nominated Canoeist of in the dub's harbour race and river the Year at this year's race results. Ron's name carne up in Annual General Meeting. council circles as a frequent About NZ Canoeing 2 Hugh Canard writes of how Ron's spokesperson for recreation on our contribution to kayaking deserves local rivers. Who drove from Nelson Executive & Officers 2 wider recognition ... to Christchurch in the middle of "Ron is one of those people whose winter to attend the NZRCA President's Comment 3 passion for canoeing manifests itself Annual General Meeting? There in many ways. Ron instructs, was Ron again. Events 3 organises races, lobbies DOC, the local council, attends long boring Many of us take it for granted that North Island Consents Projects 4 hearings and leads river trips. His the rivers will always flow free, that interest in the sport is expressed someone will push our case to Paddling in the States 6 through the enjoyment of others. councils and government departments, get up in the dark and I first met Ron when he turned up hitch up a trailer load of boats and President's Confessions 8 at a Conservation Board meeting I drive to the pool, and write was chairing. He argued eloquently submissions when they would rather Trip Report 9 the case for allowing canoe races on be out there paddling. Lake Rotoroa in Nelson Lakes Letters 10 National Park.
    [Show full text]
  • Wetlands Open to the Public in the Waikato
    Wetlands to visit in the Waikato Region of New Zealand The Waikato Region is a New Zealand The swards of rush-like plants found in the Waikato Wetland Management Agencies stronghold for wetlands. It has: Region’s peat bogs are unique to the Southern Hemisphere. Two plants found only in the Department of Conservation • around 30 percent of the country’s Waikato are the giant cane rush www.doc.govt.nz remaining wetlands, (Sporadanthus ferrugineus) and the threatened 07 858 1000 • three of NZ’s six internationally swamp helmet orchid, Corybas carsei (also recognised (Ramsar) wetlands, found in Australia). Other threatened plants Waikato Regional Council • most of NZ’s rare peat lakes include a clubmoss, a hooded orchid and an www.ew.govt.nz insectivorous bladderwort. • the two largest freshwater wetlands in 0800 800 401 the North Island, • the nation’s biggest lake, Around 25% of NZ’s Australasian bittern • the longest river, and population and one of the largest populations Auckland/Waikato • the largest river delta. of North Island fernbird live in the Fish and Game internationally significant Whangamarino www.fishandgame.org.nz Wetland. 07 849-1666 It also contains an extraordinary diversity of wetland types including geothermal springs, alpine tarns, lowland swamps, estuaries, peat Waikato wetlands are important habitats for lakes, and peat bogs. native fish including: An estimated 32,000 ha (25 percent of the pre- • threatened black mudfish that burrow human extent) of freshwater wetlands remain deep into mud or under logs to survive in the Region, with most located in the lowland dry spells for months at a time.
    [Show full text]
  • Keep Calm and Kayak On! Sarah Holmes and Emma Millen Started at Lake Taupo and Paddled to the Very End of the Waikato River at Port Waikato
    Keep Calm and Kayak On! Sarah Holmes and Emma Millen started at Lake Taupo and paddled to the very end of the Waikato River at Port Waikato. “They said it couldn’t be done, but we knew we could do it. We knew were those that doubted it could be done (including the author of this we had the fitness, skills and above all determination on our side to article!) At approximately 425 kilometres this was certainly a challenge, make it happen, but more than that we chose to do it as we couldn’t find but mid morning on Boxing Day 2012, as most people were recovering any record of anyone completing the challenge – let alone two females from Christmas Day and wondering how many alternative meals they - in six days.” could make out of a turkey, the girls slipped quietly onto the lake and These are the motivational words of two Auckland women who had paddled to the centre in their white water boats . Avoiding a Cessna 206 originally made a pledge to kayak the mighty Waikato, New Zealand’s float plane as it skimmed across the water on landing was to set the longest river, in ten days. Sarah Holmes and Emma Millen would start scene in an unexpected fashion, typically the duo saw the funny side as close to the source as possible at Lake Taupo and paddle to the very and ploughed on regardless – Keep Calm and Kayak On! end, where crystal-clear, fresh water becomes the salty expanse of the The first stage to conquer was the initial rapids section to Reid’s Farm Tasman Sea at Port Waikato.
    [Show full text]
  • Mercer Airport – Submitter #921 – Hearing Highlights Package
    Mercer Airport – Submitter #921 – Hearing Highlights Package Chris Dawson - Planning 1.1 The correct approach under the RMA is to determine what district plan provisions (or zone) most appropriately assist Waikato District Council to carry out its functions to achieve the purpose of the Act. The critical evaluation is set out in s32 of the Act which determines determine the efficiency and effectiveness of the proposed provisions in achieving the objectives of the Proposed Waikato District Plan (PDP). 1.2 Mercer Airport requires a special zone to recognise that it is already a regionally significant aviation resource and should be formally protected in the District Plan as such. The rezoning, plus Obstacle Limitation Surfaces1 and Air Noise Boundary2 provisions are required to protect that facility and provide it with the operational certainty to grow over time in the future. 1.3 The most appropriate time to provide the statutory protection for the airport and the surrounding community is now before the Mercer area gets more developed than it already is. The implementation of a Special Zone for Mercer Airport is essential to ensure that the Proposed Waikato District Plan is consistent with the relevant higher order documents, specifically the Operative Waikato Regional Policy Statement Policy 6.3 and Method 6.3.1. 1.4 The policy direction of the Rural Zone is a relevant consideration under s32 of the Act, and Lens 2 of the s42A Framework report because that zone informs the existing environment and will continue to be applied over the
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Overview - Pokeno & District
    WDC District Plan Review – Built Heritage Assessment Historic Overview - Pokeno & District Pokeno The fertile valley floor in the vicinity of Pokeno has most likely been occupied by Maori since the earliest days of their settlement of Aotearoa. Pokeno is geographically close to the Tamaki isthmus, the lower Waikato River and the Hauraki Plains, all areas densely occupied by Maori in pre-European times. Traditionally, iwi of Waikato have claimed ownership of the area. Prior to and following 1840, that iwi was Ngati Tamaoho, including the hapu of Te Akitai and Te Uri-a-Tapa. The town’s name derives from the Maori village of Pokino located north of the present town centre, which ceased to exist on the eve of General Cameron’s invasion of the Waikato in July 1863. In the early 1820s the area was repeatedly swept by Nga Puhi war parties under Hongi Hika, the first of several forces to move through the area during the inter-tribal wars of the 1820s and 1830s. It is likely that the hapu of Pokeno joined Ngati Tamaoho war parties that travelled north to attack Nga Puhi and other tribes.1 In 1822 Hongi Hika and a force of around 3000 warriors, many armed with muskets, made an epic journey south from the Bay of Islands into the Waikato. The journey involved the portage of large war waka across the Tamaki isthmus and between the Waiuku River and the headwaters of the Awaroa and hence into the Waikato River west of Pokeno. It is likely warriors from the Pokeno area were among Waikato people who felled large trees across the Awaroa River to slow Hika’s progress.
    [Show full text]