Performance Evaluation of the Integrated Protected Areas Co-Management (IPAC)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
EVALUATION Performance Evaluation of the Integrated Protected Areas Co-management (IPAC) Project : Democracy and Governance components September 2013 This publication was produced at the request of the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared independently by Catherine Mackenzie, Luca Etter, and AJM Ifjalul Haque Chowdhury of Social Impact, Inc and Saiful Islam of Research, Training, and Management International (RTM) PHOTO CREDIT: Photos collected by the IPAC Evaluation Team and compiled by Sandra Basgall, Chief of Party of the Bangladesh Democracy and Governance Program Evaluations project (BDGPE). PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF THE INTEGRATED PROTECTED AREAS CO- MANAGEMENT (IPAC) PROJECT: Democracy and Governance Components September 2013 USAID Contract AID-OAA-I-10-00003 Task Order AID-388-TO-12-00001 DISCLAIMER The authors‘ views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. CONTENTS Acronyms and Glossary ................................................................................................................................... i Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................................... iv 1. Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 1 2. The Development Problem and USAID‘s Response ....................................................................... 1 2.1 IPAC: Results framework and approach to implementation ................................................... 2 3. Purpose and Scope of the Evaluation .................................................................................................. 5 3.1 Evaluation Purpose ................................................................................................................................ 5 3.2 Evaluation Scope ............................................................................................................................... 5 4. Evaluation Methodology ......................................................................................................................... 6 4.1 Methodology ..................................................................................................................................... 6 4.2 Limitations of the evaluation ......................................................................................................... 7 5. Findings and Conclusions ....................................................................................................................... 7 5.1 Question 1: Overall Achievement of DG Objectives .............................................................. 7 5.2 Question 2: Project Coordination with STAKEHOLDERS ............................................... 16 5.3 Question 3: Capacity Building .................................................................................................... 18 5.4 Question 4: Environmental Governance ................................................................................. 21 5.5 Question 5: Communication & Outreach ............................................................................... 23 5.6 Question 6: Scaling up and Sustaining the IPAC Network ................................................. 25 5.7 Question 7: Gender and Youth ................................................................................................. 27 5.8 Question 8: IPAC DG-Related Successes and Sustainability ............................................... 29 5.9 Question 9: DG Best Practices .................................................................................................. 30 5.10 Question 10: Project Management ........................................................................................... 30 5.11 Overall Conclusions ..................................................................................................................... 32 6. Lessons Learned .................................................................................................................................... 33 7. Recommendations ................................................................................................................................ 34 Annexes ........................................................................................................................................................... 37 Annex 1: Evaluation Scope of Work ................................................................................................... 37 Annex 2: List of IPAC Clusters and sites............................................................................................. 50 Annex 3: Documents reviewed ............................................................................................................ 52 Annex 4: Evaluation Design Matrix ...................................................................................................... 55 Annex 5: Evaluation Itinerary ................................................................................................................ 64 Annex 6: Persons Interviewed ............................................................................................................... 68 Annex 7: List of 20 Policies and Legislation (Indicator 5) ................................................................ 72 Annex 8: Summary of IPAC training program June 2008-March 2013 ........................................ 73 Annex 9: List of 20 TrainingCurriculums/Modules/manuals ............................................................ 76 Annex 10: Disclosure of Any Conflict of Interest for USAID Evaluation Team Members ............................................................................................................. Error! Bookmark not defined. LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Map of IPAC‘s Clusters and Protected Areas vii LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Number of PA Sites and CMOs in IPAC, under three GoB Agencies ................................. 3 Table 2: Hierarchy of Participatory Organizations under each type of PA ......................................... 4 Table 3: Governance Dimension of each IPAC Component .................................................................. 5 Table 4: IPAC‘s Democracy and Governance Indicators, Targets and Results ................................. 8 Table 5: Results of the Final Assessment of IPAC‘s CMO Capacity, 2013 ..................................... 14 ACRONYMS AND GLOSSARY AIG(A) Alternative Income Generation (Activities) BELA Bangladesh Environmental Lawyers Association BFRI Bangladesh Forest Research Institute C&O Communication and Outreach CBD Convention on Biological Diversity CCF Chief Conservator of Forests CM Co-management CMC Co-management Committee (also Co-management Council) CMO Co-management Organization (generic term covering CMC, RMO, UCC) CNRS Centre for Natural Resource Studies CODEC Community Development Centre CONIC Community Owned Nature Interpretation Center CoP Chief of Party CPG Community Patrol Group CREL Climate Resilient Ecosystems and Livelihoods (USAID project 2013-2017) CSR Corporate Social Responsibility CWBMP Coastal and Wetland Biodiversity Management Project (UNDP project) DFID Department for International Development, (UK) DFO Divisional Forest Officer (Forest Department) DFO District Fisheries Officer (Fisheries Department) DG Democracy and Governance DoE Department of Environment DoF Department of Fisheries DPA Development Project Assistance DPP Development Project Proforma (GoB aid management modality) ECA Ecologically Critical Area (protected area under DoE authority) ECAMU ECA Management Unit FD Forest Department FDTC Forest Development and Training Centre (Kaptai) FFP Fourth Fisheries Project FGD Focus Group Discussion FRMP Forest Resource Management Project FRUG Forest Resource Users Group FRUG Federation of Resource Users Groups FSMP Forestry Sector Master Plan FSP Forestry Sector Project FTA Fisheries Training Academy FUG Forest Users Group GEF Global Environment Facility GIS Geographic Information System GIZ German International Co-operation GO Government Order GoB Government of Bangladesh Final Performance Evaluation of the Integrated Protected Areas Co-management (IPAC) Project i GPS Geographic Positioning System IPAC Integrated Protected Areas Co-management IPT Interactive Popular Theater IR Intermediate Result IRG International Resources Group (IPAC contractor) IRMP Integrated Resources Management Plan (for Sundarbans, 2010) IUCN The World Conservation Union (formerly, International Union for the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources) KAP Knowledge, Attitudes, Perceptions KI Key Informant KII Key Informant Interview LCG Local Consultative Group LDF Landscape Development Fund M&E Monitoring and Evaluation MACH Managing Aquatic Systems through Community Husbandry, USAID MoEF Ministry of Environment and Forests MoF Ministry of Finance MoFL Ministry of Fisheries and Livestock MoL Ministry of Land MoU Memorandum of Understanding NBSAP National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan NEMAP National Environmental Management Action Plan NGOs Non-Governmental Organizations NNSAP Nishorgo Network Strategy and Action Plan (2011) NP Nishorgo Progam, Forest Department NRM Natural resources management NS Nishorgo Shahayak (local volunteer facilitator)