Control of Gene Expression

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

16 Control of Gene Expression Concept Outline 16.1 Gene expression is controlled by regulating transcription. An Overview of Transcriptional Control. In bacteria transcription is regulated by controlling access of RNA polymerase to the promoter in a flexible and reversible way; eukaryotes by contrast regulate many of their genes by turning them on and off in a more permanent fashion. 16.2 Regulatory proteins read DNA without unwinding it. How to Read a Helix without Unwinding It. Regulatory proteins slide special segments called DNA- binding motifs along the major groove of the DNA helix, reading the sides of the bases. Four Important DNA-Binding Motifs. DNA-binding proteins contain structural motifs such as the helix-turn- helix which fit into the major groove of the DNA helix. 16.3 Bacteria limit transcription by blocking RNA FIGURE 16.1 polymerase. Chromosome puffs. In this chromosome of the fly Drosophila Controlling Transcription Initiation. Repressor melanogaster, individual active genes can be visualized as “puffs” proteins inhibit RNA polymerase’s access to the promoter, on the chromosomes. The RNA being transcribed from the DNA while activators facilitate its binding. template has been radioactively labeled, and the dark specks indicate its position on the chromosome. 16.4 Transcriptional control in eukaryotes operates at a distance. Designing a Complex Gene Control System. n an orchestra, all of the instruments do not play all the Eukaryotic genes use a complex collection of transcription Itime; if they did, all they would produce is noise. In- factors and enhancers to aid the polymerase in stead, a musical score determines which instruments in the transcription. orchestra play when. Similarly, all of the genes in an organ- The Effect of Chromosome Structure on Gene ism are not expressed at the same time, each gene produc- Regulation. The tight packaging of eukaryotic DNA into ing the protein it encodes full tilt. Instead, different genes nucleosomes does not interfere with gene expression. are expressed at different times, with a genetic score writ- Posttranscriptional Control in Eukaryotes. Gene ten in regulatory regions of the DNA determining which expression can be controlled at a variety of levels after genes are active when (figure 16.1). transcription. 313 16.1 Gene expression is controlled by regulating transcription. An Overview of the maintenance of a constant internal environment—is considered by many to be the hallmark of multicellular or- Transcriptional Control ganisms. Although cells in such organisms still respond to Control of gene expression is essential to all organisms. signals in their immediate environment (such as growth In bacteria, it allows the cell to take advantage of chang- factors and hormones) by altering gene expression, in ing environmental conditions. In multicellular organisms, doing so they participate in regulating the body as a it is critical for directing development and maintaining whole. In multicellular organisms with relatively constant homeostasis. internal environments, the primary function of gene con- trol in a cell is not to respond to that cell’s immediate en- vironment, but rather to participate in regulating the body Regulating Promoter Access as a whole. One way to control transcription is to regulate the initia- Some of these changes in gene expression compensate tion of transcription. In order for a gene to be tran- for changes in the physiological condition of the body. scribed, RNA polymerase must have access to the DNA Others mediate the decisions that produce the body, en- helix and must be capable of binding to the gene’s pro- suring that the right genes are expressed in the right cells moter, a specific sequence of nucleotides at one end of at the right time during development. The growth and the gene that tells the polymerase where to begin tran- development of multicellular organisms entail a long se- scribing. How is the initiation of transcription regulated? ries of biochemical reactions, each catalyzed by a specific Protein-binding nucleotide sequences on the DNA regu- enzyme. Once a particular developmental change has oc- late the initiation of transcription by modulating the abil- curred, these enzymes cease to be active, lest they disrupt ity of RNA polymerase to bind to the promoter. These the events that must follow. To produce these enzymes, protein-binding sites are usually only 10 to 15 nucleotides genes are transcribed in a carefully prescribed order, each in length (even a large regulatory protein has a “foot- for a specified period of time. In fact, many genes are ac- print,” or binding area, of only about 20 nucleotides). tivated only once, producing irreversible effects. In many Hundreds of these regulatory sequences have been char- animals, for example, stem cells develop into differenti- acterized, and each provides a binding site for a specific ated tissues like skin cells or red blood cells, following a protein able to recognize the sequence. Binding the pro- fixed genetic program that often leads to programmed tein to the regulatory sequence either blocks transcription cell death. The one-time expression of the genes that by getting in the way of RNA polymerase, or stimulates guide this program is fundamentally different from the transcription by facilitating the binding of RNA poly- reversible metabolic adjustments bacterial cells make to merase to the promoter. the environment. In all multicellular organisms, changes in gene expression within particular cells serve the needs of the whole organism, rather than the survival of indi- Transcriptional Control in Prokaryotes vidual cells. Control of gene expression is accomplished very differently in bacteria than in the cells of complex multicellular organ- Posttranscriptional Control isms. Bacterial cells have been shaped by evolution to grow and divide as rapidly as possible, enabling them to exploit Gene expression can be regulated at many levels. By far transient resources. In bacteria, the primary function of the most common form of regulation in both bacteria and gene control is to adjust the cell’s activities to its immediate eukaryotes is transcriptional control, that is, control of environment. Changes in gene expression alter which en- the transcription of particular genes by RNA polymerase. zymes are present in the cell in response to the quantity Other less common forms of control occur after transcrip- and type of available nutrients and the amount of oxygen tion, influencing the mRNA that is produced from the present. Almost all of these changes are fully reversible, al- genes or the activity of the proteins encoded by the lowing the cell to adjust its enzyme levels up or down as the mRNA. These controls, collectively referred to as post- environment changes. transcriptional controls, will be discussed briefly later in this chapter. Transcriptional Control in Eukaryotes The cells of multicellular organisms, on the other hand, have Gene expression is controlled at the transcriptional and been shaped by evolution to be protected from transient posttranscriptional levels. Transcriptional control, more common, is effected by the binding of proteins to changes in their immediate environment. Most of them ex- regulatory sequences within the DNA. perience fairly constant conditions. Indeed, homeostasis— 314 Part V Molecular Genetics 16.2 Regulatory proteins read DNA without unwinding it. How to Read a Helix without groove, the nucleotides’ hydrophobic methyl groups, hy- drogen atoms, and hydrogen bond donors and acceptors Unwinding It protrude. The pattern created by these chemical groups is It is the ability of certain proteins to bind to specific DNA unique for each of the four possible base-pair arrange- regulatory sequences that provides the basic tool of gene ments, providing a ready way for a protein nestled in the regulation, the key ability that makes transcriptional con- groove to read the sequence of bases (figure 16.2). trol possible. To understand how cells control gene expres- sion, it is first necessary to gain a clear picture of this mole- DNA-Binding Motifs cular recognition process. Protein-DNA recognition is an area of active research; so far, the structures of over 30 regulatory proteins have been Looking into the Major Groove analyzed. Although each protein is unique in its fine details, Molecular biologists used to think that the DNA helix had the part of the protein that actually binds to the DNA is to unwind before proteins could distinguish one DNA se- much less variable. Almost all of these proteins employ one quence from another; only in this way, they reasoned, of a small set of structural, or DNA-binding, motifs, par- could regulatory proteins gain access to the hydrogen ticular bends of the protein chain that permit it to interlock bonds between base-pairs. We now know it is unnecessary with the major groove of the DNA helix. for the helix to unwind because proteins can bind to its outside surface, where the edges of the base-pairs are ex- Regulatory proteins identify specific sequences on the posed. Careful inspection of a DNA molecule reveals two DNA double helix, without unwinding it, by inserting helical grooves winding round the molecule, one deeper DNA-binding motifs into the major groove of the double helix where the edges of the bases protrude. than the other. Within the deeper groove, called the major Major groove Major groove H H H N O HN H H N N H O CH3 N G NH N C H N A NHN T H N N N N Sugar N H O H O H Phosphate Minor groove Minor groove Key: = Hydrogen bond donors = Hydrogen bond acceptors = Hydrophobic methyl group = Hydrogen atoms unable to form hydrogen bonds FIGURE 16.2 Reading the major groove of DNA. Looking down into the major groove of a DNA helix, we can see the edges of the bases protruding into the groove. Each of the four possible base-pair arrangements (two are shown here) extends a unique set of chemical groups into the groove, indicated in this diagram by differently colored balls.
Recommended publications
  • An Atlas of Gene Regulatory Elements in Adult Mouse Cerebrum Yang Eric Li1*, Sebastian Preissl2*, Xiaomeng Hou2, Ziyang Zhang1

    An Atlas of Gene Regulatory Elements in Adult Mouse Cerebrum Yang Eric Li1*, Sebastian Preissl2*, Xiaomeng Hou2, Ziyang Zhang1

    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.10.087585; this version posted May 11, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 1 An Atlas of Gene Regulatory Elements in Adult Mouse Cerebrum 2 3 Yang Eric Li1*, Sebastian Preissl2*, Xiaomeng Hou2, Ziyang Zhang1, Kai Zhang1, Rongxin 4 Fang1, Yunjiang Qiu1, Olivier Poirion2, Bin Li1, Hanqing Liu3, Xinxin Wang2, Jee Yun Han2, 5 Jacinta Lucero4, Yiming Yan1, Samantha Kuan1, David Gorkin2, Michael Nunn3, Eran A. 6 Mukamel5, M. Margarita Behrens4, Joseph Ecker3,6 and Bing Ren1,2,7 7 8 *these authors contributed equally 9 10 1Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA 11 2Center for Epigenomics, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of 12 California, San Diego, School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA. 13 3Genomic Analysis Laboratory, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA, 14 92037, USA. 15 4Computational Neurobiology Laboratory, Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, 16 CA 92037, USA 17 5Department of Cognitive Science, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 18 92037, USA. 19 6Howard Hughes Medical Institute, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA, 20 92037, USA. 21 7Institute of Genomic Medicine, Moores Cancer Center, University of California San 22 Diego, School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA. 23 24 Correspondence: Bing Ren ([email protected]) 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.10.087585; this version posted May 11, 2020.
  • 16.1 | Regulation of Gene Expression

    16.1 | Regulation of Gene Expression

    436 Chapter 16 | Gene Expression 16.1 | Regulation of Gene Expression By the end of this section, you will be able to do the following: • Discuss why every cell does not express all of its genes all of the time • Describe how prokaryotic gene regulation occurs at the transcriptional level • Discuss how eukaryotic gene regulation occurs at the epigenetic, transcriptional, post-transcriptional, translational, and post-translational levels For a cell to function properly, necessary proteins must be synthesized at the proper time and place. All cells control or regulate the synthesis of proteins from information encoded in their DNA. The process of turning on a gene to produce RNA and protein is called gene expression. Whether in a simple unicellular organism or a complex multi-cellular organism, each cell controls when and how its genes are expressed. For this to occur, there must be internal chemical mechanisms that control when a gene is expressed to make RNA and protein, how much of the protein is made, and when it is time to stop making that protein because it is no longer needed. The regulation of gene expression conserves energy and space. It would require a significant amount of energy for an organism to express every gene at all times, so it is more energy efficient to turn on the genes only when they are required. In addition, only expressing a subset of genes in each cell saves space because DNA must be unwound from its tightly coiled structure to transcribe and translate the DNA. Cells would have to be enormous if every protein were expressed in every cell all the time.
  • Formation of Heterodimers Between Wild Type and Mutant Trp Aporepressor Polypeptides of Eschem'chia Coli Thomas J

    Formation of Heterodimers Between Wild Type and Mutant Trp Aporepressor Polypeptides of Eschem'chia Coli Thomas J

    PROTEINS: Structure, Function, and Genetics 4:173-181 (1988) Formation of Heterodimers Between Wild Type and Mutant trp Aporepressor Polypeptides of Eschem'chia coli Thomas J. Graddis,' Lisa S. Klig,' Charles Yanofsky,' and Dale L. Oxender' 'Department of Biological Chemistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109 and 'Department of Biological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305 ABSTRACT Availability of the three-dimen- tophan.1-6 The trp aporepressor is activated by the sional structure of the trp repressor of Escherichia binding of two molecules of its corepressor. Once ac- coli and a large group of repressor mutants has per- tivated, trp repressor binds to the operators of the trp, mitted the identification and analysis of mutants aroH, and trpR operons, regulating transcription ini- with substitutions of the amino acid residues that tiati~n.~,'The aroH and trp operons encode biosyn- form the tryptophan binding pocket. Mutant apore- thetic enzymes, whereas the trpR operon encodes the pressors selected for study were overproduced using trp aporepressor. The trpR gene has been cloned and a multicopy expression plasmid. Equilibrium di- its nucleotide sequence determined.3 The aporepres- alysis with ''C-tryptophan and purified mutant and sor and repressor have been purified and the crystal wild type aporepressors was employed to determine structures of both have been solved at high resolu- tryptophan binding constants. The results obtained ti~n.~-"The trp aporepressor is a dimer of identical indicate that replacement of threonine 44 by methi- 107 residue polypeptides." The existence of the three- onine (TM44) or arginine 84 by histidine (RH84) low- dimensional structures, and the availability of many ers the affinity for tryptophan approximately two- repressor mutants,2i12has facilitated this analysis of and four-fold, respectively.
  • Zinc Fingers and a Green Thumb: Manipulating Gene Expression in Plants Segal, Stege and Barbas 165

    Zinc Fingers and a Green Thumb: Manipulating Gene Expression in Plants Segal, Stege and Barbas 165

    163 Zinc fingers and a green thumb: manipulating gene expression in plants David J Segaly, Justin T Stegez and Carlos F Barbas IIIç Artificial transcription factors can be rapidly constructed A variety of techniques have been developed to manip- from predefined zinc-finger modules to regulate virtually any ulate gene expression in plants. Increased expression of gene. Stable, heritable up- and downregulation of endogenous genes is most commonly achieved through endogenous genes has been demonstrated in transgenic transgene overexpression [1]. The introduction of tissue- plants. These advances promise new approaches for creating specific and inducible promoters has improved the utility functional knockouts and conditional overexpression, and of this approach, and efficient and robust plant transforma- for other gene discovery and manipulation applications in tion techniques have made the construction of transgenes plants. a relatively routine task. However, variable expression and co-suppression of transgenes often complicate this process. Addresses Furthermore, transgenes cannot accommodate alternative ÃThe Skaggs Institute for Chemical Biology and the Department of splicing, which may be important for the appropriate Molecular Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, function of some transgenes [2]. California 92037, USA yDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721, USA Reducing or eliminating the expression of a gene in plants zDiversa Corporation, San Diego, California 92121, USA is not as simple as overexpressing a gene. Gene disruption §The Scripps Research Institute, BCC-550, North Torrey Pines Road, by homologous recombination, tDNA insertions and che- La Jolla, California 92037, USA mical mutagenesis has been used successfully, but these e-mail: [email protected] Correspondence: Carlos F Barbas III approaches are inefficient and time-consuming technolo- gies.
  • Evolution of Genomic Expression

    Evolution of Genomic Expression

    C H A P T E R 5 Evolution of Genomic Expression Bernardo Lemos, Christian R. Landry, Pierre Fontanillas, Susan P. Renn, Rob Kulathinal, Kyle M. Brown, and Daniel L. Hartl Introduction Genomic regulation is key to cellular differentiation, tissue morphogenesis, and development. Increasing evidence indicates that evolutionary diversity of phenotypes—from cellular to organismic—may also be, in large part, the result of variation in the regulation of genomic expression. In this chapter we explore the complexity of gene regulation from the perspective of single genes and whole genomes. The first part describes the major factors affecting gene expression levels, from rates of gene transcrip- tion—as mediated by promoter–enhancer interactions and chromatin mod- ifications—to rates of mRNA degradation. This description underscores the multiple levels at which genomic expression can be regulated as well as the complexity and variety of mechanisms used. We then briefly describe the major experimental and computational biology techniques for analyzing gene expression variation and its underlying causes. The final section reviews our understanding of the role of regulatory variation in evolution, including the molecular evolution and population genetics of noncoding DNA, as well as the inheritance and phenotypic evolution of levels of mRNA abundance. The Complex Regulation of Genomic Expression The regulation of gene expression is a complex and dynamic process. It is not a simple matter to turn a gene on and off, let alone precisely regulate its level of expression. Regulation can be accomplished through various mech- anisms at nearly every step of the process of gene expression. Furthermore, each mechanism may require a variety of elements, including DNA sequences, RNA molecules, and proteins, acting in combination to deter- 2 Chapter Five Evolution of Genomic Expression 3 mine the final amount, timing, and location of functional gene product.
  • In Response to DNA Damage and C&Sol

    In Response to DNA Damage and C&Sol

    Oncogene (2009) 28, 3235–3245 & 2009 Macmillan Publishers Limited All rights reserved 0950-9232/09 $32.00 www.nature.com/onc ORIGINAL ARTICLE C/EBPa expression is partially regulated by C/EBPb in response to DNA damage and C/EBPa-deficient fibroblasts display an impaired G1 checkpoint R Ranjan1, EA Thompson1, K Yoon2 and RC Smart1 1Cell Signaling and Cancer Group, Department of Environmental and Molecular Toxicology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA and 2National Cancer Center, Division of Common Cancers, Lung Cancer Branch, Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea We observed that CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein involved in homo- or hetero-dimerization (Ramji and (C/EBP)a is highly inducible in primary fibroblasts by Foka, 2002). The N-terminal region contains transcrip- DNA-damaging agents that induce strand breaks, alky- tion activation and regulatory domains that interact late and crosslink DNA as well as those that produce with basal transcription apparatus and transcription bulky DNA lesions. Fibroblasts deficient in C/EBPa co-activators. There are six members of the C/EBP family À/À (C/EBPa ) display an impaired G1 checkpoint as and C/EBPs have important functions in fundamental evidenced by an inappropriate entry into the S-phase in cellular processes, including proliferation, apoptosis, response to DNA damage, and these cells also display an differentiation, inflammation, senescence and energy enhanced G1/S transition in response to mitogens. The metabolism (Ramji and Foka, 2002; Johnson, 2005). induction of C/EBPa by DNA
  • Molecular Basis of the Function of Transcriptional Enhancers

    Molecular Basis of the Function of Transcriptional Enhancers

    cells Review Molecular Basis of the Function of Transcriptional Enhancers 1,2, 1, 1,3, Airat N. Ibragimov y, Oleg V. Bylino y and Yulii V. Shidlovskii * 1 Laboratory of Gene Expression Regulation in Development, Institute of Gene Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 34/5 Vavilov St., 119334 Moscow, Russia; [email protected] (A.N.I.); [email protected] (O.V.B.) 2 Center for Precision Genome Editing and Genetic Technologies for Biomedicine, Institute of Gene Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 34/5 Vavilov St., 119334 Moscow, Russia 3 I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, 8, bldg. 2 Trubetskaya St., 119048 Moscow, Russia * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +7-4991354096 These authors contributed equally to this study. y Received: 30 May 2020; Accepted: 3 July 2020; Published: 5 July 2020 Abstract: Transcriptional enhancers are major genomic elements that control gene activity in eukaryotes. Recent studies provided deeper insight into the temporal and spatial organization of transcription in the nucleus, the role of non-coding RNAs in the process, and the epigenetic control of gene expression. Thus, multiple molecular details of enhancer functioning were revealed. Here, we describe the recent data and models of molecular organization of enhancer-driven transcription. Keywords: enhancer; promoter; chromatin; transcriptional bursting; transcription factories; enhancer RNA; epigenetic marks 1. Introduction Gene transcription is precisely organized in time and space. The process requires the participation of hundreds of molecules, which form an extensive interaction network. Substantial progress was achieved recently in our understanding of the molecular processes that take place in the cell nucleus (e.g., see [1–9]).
  • Chapter 12 Gene Expression and Regulation

    Chapter 12 Gene Expression and Regulation

    PYF12 3/21/05 8:04 PM Page 191 Chapter 12 Gene expression and regulation Bacterial genomes usually contain several thousand different genes. Some of the gene products are required by the cell under all growth conditions and are called house- keeping genes. These include the genes that encode such proteins as DNA poly- merase, RNA polymerase, and DNA gyrase. Many other gene products are required under specific growth conditions. These include enzymes that synthesize amino acids, break down specific sugars, or respond to a specific environmental condition such as DNA damage. Housekeeping genes must be expressed at some level all of the time. Frequently, as the cell grows faster, more of the housekeeping gene products are needed. Even under very slow growth, some of each housekeeping gene product is made. The gene prod- ucts required for specific growth conditions are not needed all of the time. These genes are frequently expressed at extremely low levels, or not expressed at all when they are not needed and yet made when they are needed. This chapter will examine gene regulation or how bacteria regulate the expression of their genes so that the genes that are being expressed meet the needs of the cell for a specific growth condition. Gene regulation can occur at three possible places in the production of an active gene product. First, the transcription of the gene can be regulated. This is known as transcriptional regulation. When the gene is transcribed and how much it is transcribed influences the amount of gene product that is made. Second, if the gene encodes a protein, it can be regulated at the translational level.
  • Gene Expression: Layers of Gene Regulation

    Gene Expression: Layers of Gene Regulation

    RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTS GENE EXPRESSION methylation. Spearman’s rank cor- relation between methylation levels Layers of gene regulation (within 50 kb on either side of the transcription start site) and alterna- A new study investigates genetic and expression and DNA methylation lev- tive splicing levels show that, for epigenetic influences on genome els often overlap functional elements. many of the genes tested, there is a regulation and alternative splicing, Across cell types, expression quantita- significant association. Of note, many and highlights the tissue specificity of tive trait loci (eQTLs) are enriched in of the associations between DNA some of these interactions. DNase I-hypersensitive sites, whereas methylation and alternative splicing In a previous study, the researchers methylation QTLs (mQTLs) are are cell type-specific, illustrating examined the relationship between enriched in enhancers and insulators. another layer of cellular variability. genetic variation, DNA methyation Their statistical analyses show that, A complex relationship between and gene expression using samples generally, genetic variation has a more DNA methylation and gene expres- from the GenCord cohort that were consistent effect on gene expres- sion is beginning to emerge. This derived from umbilical cords of 204 sion across cell types, although the study further defines the roles of newborn children. They genotyped strength of the effect can be variable. genomic and epigenomic variation 2.5 million single-nucleotide poly- However, the effects of epigenetic in determining cellular phenotypes, morphisms (SNPs), assayed the meth- variation on gene expression are more and the mechanisms by which these ylation levels of 482,421 CpG sites tissue-specific. Methylation sites effects might occur.
  • Transcription in Eukaryotes

    Transcription in Eukaryotes

    Transcription in eukaryotes Chromatin structure and its effects on transcription RNA polymerases Promoters General Transcription Factors Activators and Repressors Enhancers and ( Silencers ) Order of events leading to transcription initiation in eukaryotes at a specific promoter CRC … and chemical DNA modifications The order of steps on the pathway to transcription initiation appears to be different for different promoters Acção concertada de: -Activadores/ repressores ( proteínas auxiliares acessórias) -Proteínas de remodelação da cromatina -Capacidade de ligação dos factores gerais da transcrição Chromatin Remodeling Complexes (CRC) or Nucleosome remodeling factors ATPase/Helicase activity and DNA binding protein motifs Histone acetylation is one of the Histone histone chemical modifications acetylation characteristic of actively transcribed chromatin Interaction with other histones and with DNA Lys + HAT- histone acetyltransferase HDAC- histone deacetylase DNA chemical modifications affecting transcription initiation in eukaryotes How DNA methylation may help turning off genes? The binding of gene regulatory proteins and the general transcription machinery near an active promoter may prevent DNA methylation by excluding de novo methylases . If most of these proteins dissociate from the DNA, however, as generally occurs when a cell no longer produces the required activator proteins , the DNA becomes methylated , which enables other proteins to bind, and these shut down the gene completely by further altering chromatin structure . DNA
  • Minireview Mcbindall—A Better Name for CCAAT/Enhancer Binding

    Minireview Mcbindall—A Better Name for CCAAT/Enhancer Binding

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector Cell, Vol. 107, 259–261, November 2, 2001, Copyright 2001 by Cell Press McBindall—A Better Name for Minireview CCAAT/Enhancer Binding Proteins? Steven L. McKnight1 code a heterodimeric transcription factor, as well as Department of Biochemistry recognition that the Myc proto-oncogene encodes a UT Southwestern Medical Center transcription factor. Such studies also provided a frame- 5323 Harry Hines Boulevard work and powerful battery of reagents useful for the Dallas, Texas 75390 biological study of C/EBP itself. Finally, biochemical studies of C/EBP helped dispel the myth, anticipated from earlier work on bacterial gene expression, that C/EBP-related transcription factors regulate the bal- eukaryotic transcription factors must have exquisite ance between cell proliferation and mitotic growth ar- binding specificity. This shift of thinking led to the under- rest during terminal differentiation. Three new studies standing that eukaryotic genes employ complex en- give evidence that this regulation is mediated by pro- hancers that integrate the instruction of multiple tran- tein:protein interactions completely distinct from the scription factors acting in a combinatorial manner role of C/EBPs in gene expression. (Thompson and McKnight, 1992). The previous issue of Cell and the most recent issue In the mid-1980s Barbara Graves and Peter Johnson of Molecular Cell present three exciting papers relevant were postdoctoral fellows in my laboratory at the Carne- to the function of various members of the C/EBP family gie Embryology Department. Barbara and Peter were of transcription factors.
  • How Are Protein Products Made from a Gene?

    How Are Protein Products Made from a Gene?

    How are protein products made from a gene? Copyright 2016 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia How are protein products made from a gene? Step 1: Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) is stored within the compartment of the cell called the nucleus. Nucleus DNA is a sequence made up of building blocks called nucleotides (more information can be found DNA in “What is some basic information about DNA?”). RNA When a gene is expressed, the DNA opens up and is transcribed into RNA; this step is called transcription. Cytoplasm Copyright 2016 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia How are protein products made from a gene? Step 2: Nucleus Ribonucleic acid (RNA) is created from transcribing DNA. DNA The RNA is exported from the nucleus into RNA the large compartment of the cell called the cytoplasm. A structure called the ribosome will read the RNA sequence; this step is called translation. protein ribosome In this step, an amino acid sequence will be Cytoplasm generated. There are 20 amino acids used to make proteins (more details about DNA, RNA and amino acids can be found in “What is some basic information about DNA?”, “What is transcription?” and “What is translation?”). Copyright 2016 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia How are protein products made from a gene? Nucleus Step 3: Once the amino acid sequence is DNA generated, the molecule will fold into a three-dimensional (3-D) RNA structure. The protein may go through other processing, but essentially is ready protein to perform its function.