The Oklahoma Geology Notes, Which Had Been a Feature of the Oklahoma Geology Scene Since the Early 40S, but Was Last Published in 2014

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Oklahoma Geology Notes, Which Had Been a Feature of the Oklahoma Geology Scene Since the Early 40S, but Was Last Published in 2014 VOLUME 75 FALL 2016 STRATIGRAPHIC NOMENCLATURE OF THE OUACHITA MOUNTAINS IN OKLAHOMA: FORMAL, INFORMAL, OBSOLETE, AND INCORRECT or THE GOOD, THE BAD, AND THE UGLY INSIDE ON PAGE 5 OKLAHOMA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OKLAHOMA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY DR. JEREMY BOAK, Director OGS Geologist Neil Suneson Editor delves into the Good, the Bad, and Ted Satterfield the Ugly of the topic of stratigraphic nomenclature in the Ouachita Mountains. Cartography Manager James Anderson GIS Specialist Russell Standridge Copy Center Manager Richard Murray This publication, printed by the Oklahoma Geological Survey, Norman, Oklahoma, is issued by the Oklahoma Geological Survey as authorized by Title 70, Oklahoma Statutes 1981, Section 3310, and Title 74, Oklahoma Statutes 1981, Sections 231—238 The Oklahoma Geological Survey is a state agency for research and public service, mandated in the State Constitution to study Oklahoma’s land, water, mineral and energy resources and to promote wise Cover: Outcrop of the Wapanucka Limestone use and sound environmental practices. east of Hartshorne, Oklahoma. (Photo by TED SATTERFIELD). 2 FALL 2016 Grateful to be back As the Director of the Oklahoma Geological Survey (OGS), I am very glad to see the revival of the Oklahoma Geology Notes, which had been a feature of the Oklahoma geology scene since the early 40s, but was last published in 2014. This issue, marking the return, introduces a new format, becoming less of a newsletter and more of a scientific publication. From there we proceed, as many geological investigations do, from the surface downward. We start up the Notes again with Neil Sune- son’s take on stratigraphic nomenclature in the Ouachita Mountains. Just the word “nomen- clature” tends to produce yawns among many scientists, but making sure that we are talking about the same rock units can be a challenge when different regional names don’t necessarily meet in the middle due to the lateral variations Jeremy Boak of rock units. OGS Director As geologists, we are tasked with character- izing the crust of the earth in three spatial di- Providing clear rationale, and straightforward mensions, through time. But, as OGS geophysi- description of any revision of rock names — cist Kevin Crain pointed out to me recently, the what names are being changed, and how do the problem is really n-dimensional, as we must new names relate to existing stratigraphic terms identify and measure critical properties, each — is needed to ensure that the value of older of which covers its own natural range, varying literature will not be lost. through time as well. In the realm of sedimen- Our hope is that the new Oklahoma Geology tary rocks, we can count in general on greater Notes will channel the best of the previous long variation in the vertical than the horizontal series and bring some new scenes, new takes on dimension (or we would not be able to iden- old locations, current developments, interesting tify strata to begin with). But the recognition ideas, and show that, no matter how old, there that lithostratigraphic units are not the same as is always something new to be learned about chronostratigraphic units can lead to confusion. Oklahoma geology. 3 OKLAHOMA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 4 FALL 2016 STRATIGRAPHIC NOMENCLATURE OF THE OUACHITA MOUNTAINS IN OKLAHOMA: FORMAL, INFORMAL, OBSOLETE, AND INCORRECT or The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly By Neil H. Suneson INTRODUCTION units that are exposed or are in the subsurface in the Oklahoma Ouachita Mountains and that are present The nomenclature of the stratigraphic units in the subsurface near the Choctaw Fault. The units (groups, formations, members) in the Ouachita Moun- in the subsurface in the southern part of the Arkoma tains in Oklahoma has changed since the first geologic Basin are typically folded and faulted and are part of map of part of the mountain range was published in the Ouachita tectonic belt. The names are limited to 1902 (Taff, 1902). Proposed revisions to the formation those of units that are older than the Desmoinesian names were typically based on a number of factors: Hartshorne Formation. Whereas the Hartshorne and 1) more detailed mapping than was previously avail- younger formations are folded and faulted, they are not able; 2) more and better paleontological data; 3) bet- present at the surface south of the trace of the Choctaw ter stratigraphic correlations with units exposed in the Fault and are therefore beyond the scope of this paper. Oklahoma and Arkansas Ouachita Mountains and the Arkoma Basin; and 4) more and better subsurface data. BACKGROUND In addition, changes in the “rules” for naming geologic units as prescribed in the 1933, 1961, 1970, 1983, and The basis for this paper is the Code of Stratigraphic 2005 “Codes of Stratigraphic Nomenclature” forced Nomenclature. As discussed below, many names were Ouachita stratigraphers and geologists to reexamine assigned before any code existed. Ashley et al. (1933) formerly accepted names. In many cases, however, published the first “code” (although the term “code” geologists ignored the existing code and introduced was not included in the title), and two of its co-authors new terms without emphasizing their informal nature. – Charles Gould and Hugh Miser – were very familiar Petroleum geologists exacerbated the confusion, par- with the stratigraphy of the Ouachita Mountains. The ticularly in the northern frontal belt (Figure 1) of the authors used the word “rules” in their paper, but ad- Ouachitas, by using new names that applied to strata mitted that the “rules” were really “guidelines.” The encountered only in the subsurface. American Commission on Stratigraphic Nomenclature This report briefly describes the history of the (ACSN) published a revised code in 1961 (ACSN, stratigraphic nomenclature of the Ouachita Moun- 1961) and an only slightly revised code again in 1970 tains in Oklahoma. It describes the currently accepted (ACSN, 1970). The code was largely rewritten in 1983 group, formation (Figure 2), and member names and by the North American Commission on Stratigraphic distinguishes between those that are generally con- Nomenclature (NACSN) (NACSN, 1983) who also sidered “formal” by geologists and those that, while published a revised version in 2005 (NACSN, 2005). widely used, are informal. This report also comments Like the 1933 “code,” the 2005 version is more a set on some problems with the accepted formal and in- of guidelines than rules as evidenced by the common formal nomenclature and proposes some solutions to use of the word “should” instead of “must.” For exam- those problems. The subsurface nomenclature used ple, when naming a subsurface unit, “the hole or mine in the northern frontal belt is discussed and clarified. should be (instead of “must be”) located precisely” More importantly, perhaps, this paper recommends that (NACSN, 2005, p. 1564) (author’s italics and paren- some commonly used but informal names be viewed theses). as formal and that formal, but little-used or poorly jus- Many of the units in the Oklahoma Ouachita tified, names or those of local units be changed. Mountains were named before the 1933 “code” was The names reviewed in this report are of those published and have been widely used for almost 100 5 OKLAHOMA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Figure 1. Generalized geologic map of the Ouachita Mountains, Oklahoma. Modified from Arbenz (2008, plate 2). years. Although their names do not fulfil many of the logic Names Lexicon (“Geolex”) (http://ngmdb.usgs. criteria now necessary for a name to be recognized, gov/Geolex/search). Geolex is a searchable database they are considered formal because they have been based on lexicons published as hard-copy bulletins by used for many years and are well-established in the the USGS. This database lists names used by the USGS geologic literature. Article 7 (c) of the modern strati- and the different state surveys and claims to identify graphic code (NACSN, 2005) recognizes the need with a slash (see website) those that do not conform to preserve commonly used, but perhaps imprecisely with the stratigraphic code(s) cited above; in fact, defined, names of stratigraphic units. One unit – the Geolex does not do this (e.g., see discussion on Lynn Spiro Sandstone at the base of the Atoka Formation – Mountain Formation, below). Geolex also does not al- is widely used in the petroleum industry and is easily ways restrict the name of a unit to a specific rank; for recognized and mapped on the surface and subsurface. example, the USGS and OGS recognize the Springer Although it has not met the rigorous requirements for as a group and a formation. In addition, the OGS rec- being considered formal, this paper recognizes it as ognizes Springer Shale as a formal unit. Table 1 shows such. the names of the units in the Oklahoma Ouachita An important source for stratigraphic nomencla- Mountains as recognized by the USGS and Oklahoma ture is the U.S. Geological Survey’s (USGS) U.S. Geo- Geological Survey (OGS) (source: Geolex database at 6 STRATIGRAPHIC COLUMN OF OUACHITA MOUNTAINS FALL 2016 Platform Stratigraphy Ouachita Stratigraphy n a i Atoka Formation Atoka Formation n Atokan a v l y s Wapanucka Limestone Johns Valley Shale n n e Jackfork Group P Morrowan Springer Formation Chest- n erian a i Stanley Group p Mera- p i mecian s s Caney Shale i s Osagean s i M Kinder- hookian Arkansas Novaculite Upper Middle Devonian Lower Upper Missouri Mountain Shale Lower Blaylock Sandstone Silurian Polk Creek Shale Upper Bigfork Chert Middle Womble Shale Blakely Sandstone Ordovician Mazarn Shale Lower Crystal Mountain Sandstone Upper Collier Shale Cambrian Figure 2. Generalized stratigraphic column of the Ouachita Mountains, Oklahoma. Subdivisions of groups and formations discussed in text. Modified from Arbenz (2008, plate 2). 7 OKLAHOMA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY ngmdb.usgs.gov/Geolex/search; accessed June 28, 2016).
Recommended publications
  • 2021 Area Lodging Guide
    VISITMCCURTAINCOUNTY.COM Hwy 259 Ti mb il erwolf Tra Golf Cours Lu e Road ci River Bend an Road C Sorrel edar Creek il Carson ra oad T Creek Area R a k at ee f r k Moun C u odge L Lakeview L Broken Bow r tai n L e Gap Road F ns ork o b e e Rive s v iv t e Dr Reservoir m ail Deer Creek Trail te Coyot r C i r S r T Stevens e T a e t k a Gap Area L u kf Hochatown H T Overlook R 259A ve O Ste ns Gap Creek Beaver Lodge Nature Trails N Radio Tower Beacon 259A River Bend Power Area House Big Oak Hwy Nature Trails 259 Mou H nta in T Fo rk R R iver Beavers Bend O Gr 259A N a State Park v Reregulation Dam el R 4.3 Miles oad Public Presbyterian Use Area Falls Hwy ile Hwy 1 M 7 Steel iles 70 3 Junction 259 5 M d a Oak Hill o R Broken g i Bow a r 70 BUS C N 70 . Craig Road NW Texas Ave. C e n t r H a l T A v R e BUS . O Hwy N Broken 70 259 t t MLK Dr. Bow d e SE Washington St. e 10th St. a e e o r C r t e t 9th St. R n S S t e e y y r 8th St. m a v v a a a i i l r r w 70 w A D 7th St.
    [Show full text]
  • Property for Sale Broken Bow Oklahoma
    Property For Sale Broken Bow Oklahoma Inertial and shrinelike Ragnar industrialised while stupefacient Sigmund overlards her populace uncommendably and embrangles weekdays. Warped and actionable Sergio caviling while battle-scarred Arvind epistolising her obligatoriness significatively and cinchonizes violently. Diego tunnel her pseudonyms unhappily, synecologic and conjugate. How the help you for oklahoma or as your vacation destination weekend with increasing as slings now Tate operates a standing cattle ranch in elaborate Bow OK with the help of you beloved helper Pepper a devoted blue heeler Ridgeview 41 Acres SOLD 75 Acre. Even more details and the eastern wild turkey constructs development. Broken Bow Waterfront Properties for Sale United Country. REAL ESTATE The median home farm in each Bow hook Real Estate 6300 Home appreciation the last 10 years has been 37. You for sale by owner financed properties is prime hunting land adjacent to check with all property listed as bow lake and hochatown, personal countryside escape. Tripadvisor finding the property for properties are standing in bow! Groups and property in oklahoma general area and sits on the lost creek area are you may discover an easy. Broken Bow OK real estate listings and homes for honest home. Travelocity has been easier to the family homes, llc is to the cabin building lots for lease situation is. Find property for oklahoma land. Just minutes from motivated sellers to hunt hogs, hiking trails southwest and appliances, texas real estate requirements in bow property for sale broken oklahoma? The broken bow cabins for properties for individuals with plenty of space for captcha below for dian jordan said, no rent out homes on front access.
    [Show full text]
  • Pre-Atoka Rocks of Northern Arkansas
    Pre-Atoka Rocks of Northern Arkansas GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 314-H Pre-Atoka Rocks of Northern Arkansas By SHERWOOD E. FREZON and ERNEST E. CLICK SHORTER CONTRIBUTIONS TO GENERAL GEOLOGY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 314-H Thickness, lithofacies, and geologic history of potential oil and gas producing rocks of Paleozoic age in northern Arkansas UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1959 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR FRED A. SEATON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director The U. S. Geological Survey Library has cataloged this publication as follows: Frezon, Sherwood Earl, 1921- Pre-Atoka rocks of northern Arkansas, by Sherwood E. Frezon and Ernest E. Glick. Washington, U. S. Govt. Print. Off., 1959. iii, 171-189 p. maps, diagrs., table. 30 cm. (U. S. Geological Sur­ vey. Professional paper 314-H. Shorter contributions to general geology) Part of illustrative matter fold, col., in pocket. Bibliography: p. 186-187. 1. Geology Arkansas. 2. Rocks, Sedimentary. 3. Geology, Strati- graphic Paleozoic. i. Glick, Ernest Earwood, 1922- joint author, n. Title. (Series: U. S. Geological Survey. Professional paper 314-H. Series: U. S. Geological Survey. Shorter contribu­ tions to general geology) 551.7209767 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D. C. CONTENTS Page Abstract .__----_ ---_-_._--._---__-_-____ 171 Stratigraphy Continued Page Introduction. ___ ___________________________________ 171 Probable latest Mississippian and early
    [Show full text]
  • Geographic Names
    GEOGRAPHIC NAMES CORRECT ORTHOGRAPHY OF GEOGRAPHIC NAMES ? REVISED TO JANUARY, 1911 WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1911 PREPARED FOR USE IN THE GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE BY THE UNITED STATES GEOGRAPHIC BOARD WASHINGTON, D. C, JANUARY, 1911 ) CORRECT ORTHOGRAPHY OF GEOGRAPHIC NAMES. The following list of geographic names includes all decisions on spelling rendered by the United States Geographic Board to and including December 7, 1910. Adopted forms are shown by bold-face type, rejected forms by italic, and revisions of previous decisions by an asterisk (*). Aalplaus ; see Alplaus. Acoma; township, McLeod County, Minn. Abagadasset; point, Kennebec River, Saga- (Not Aconia.) dahoc County, Me. (Not Abagadusset. AQores ; see Azores. Abatan; river, southwest part of Bohol, Acquasco; see Aquaseo. discharging into Maribojoc Bay. (Not Acquia; see Aquia. Abalan nor Abalon.) Acworth; railroad station and town, Cobb Aberjona; river, IVIiddlesex County, Mass. County, Ga. (Not Ackworth.) (Not Abbajona.) Adam; island, Chesapeake Bay, Dorchester Abino; point, in Canada, near east end of County, Md. (Not Adam's nor Adams.) Lake Erie. (Not Abineau nor Albino.) Adams; creek, Chatham County, Ga. (Not Aboite; railroad station, Allen County, Adams's.) Ind. (Not Aboit.) Adams; township. Warren County, Ind. AJjoo-shehr ; see Bushire. (Not J. Q. Adams.) Abookeer; AhouJcir; see Abukir. Adam's Creek; see Cunningham. Ahou Hamad; see Abu Hamed. Adams Fall; ledge in New Haven Harbor, Fall.) Abram ; creek in Grant and Mineral Coun- Conn. (Not Adam's ties, W. Va. (Not Abraham.) Adel; see Somali. Abram; see Shimmo. Adelina; town, Calvert County, Md. (Not Abruad ; see Riad. Adalina.) Absaroka; range of mountains in and near Aderhold; ferry over Chattahoochee River, Yellowstone National Park.
    [Show full text]
  • Quartz Crystal Deposits of Western Arkansas
    Quartz Crystal Deposits of Western Arkansas By A. E. J. ENGEL CONTRIBUTIONS TO ECONOMIC GEOLOGY, 1951 GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 973-E Geology of an important domestic source of quartz for optical and oscillator use UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1952 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Oscar L. Chapman, Secretary . GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. E. Wrather, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D. C. - Price $1.50 (paper cover) CONTENTS Page Abstract______-_:________-___-____-___________-___-______-_____ 173 Introduction ____ _________________________________________________ 174 History of mining__________________-__-_-_______----_-_--__-_----_ 175 Production and use of crystals.________^____________________________ 178 Geology--...---.-----.---.--------------------------------------- 186 Stratigraphy.__________-_--___-___----.-_-___---_---_-_-_-_-_- 186 General features.___-___________--_---_------.-_-_-._-__-__ 186 Principal quartz-bearing formations______1_________________ 187 Crystal Mountain sandstone (Ordovician?) _______________ 187 Blakely sandstone (Ordovician)_________________________ 189 Structure___._____--___-_-__-__-__-___-_________-_____________ 192 Structural features of the Ouachita anticlinorium_---_____.____ 192 Fractures controlling the deposition of quartz _________________ 194 Quartz deposits_.________"__________-______________________________ 200 Form, size, and distribution_____-_______.__._______._;________ 200 Classification of
    [Show full text]
  • Fluvial Geomorphology Analysis of the Kiamichi River, Oklahoma
    W 2800.7 F293 no. T-l9-P-l 6/04-6/06 c.l FLUVIAL GEOMORPHOLOGY ANALYSIS OF THE KIAMICIll RIVER, OKLAHOMA OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE CONSERVATION' JUNE 1,2004 through JUNE 30, 2006 A comprehensive geomorphic analysis of the Kiamichi River, Oklahoma was conducted to characterize the current landscape, fluvial geomorphic condition, flow and sediment regimes, and to identify potential impacts from the impoundment of the Jackfork Creek tributary to the morphological form and function of the river. The Kiamichi River channel has changed little over the last 25 years. It was classified as a Rosgen F type stream and had a basin relief ratio of 0.00345. The Kiamichi River Basin is classified as a Rosgen X type valley. Meander wavelength increased significantly in the downstream direction; the average reach meander wavelength ranged from 11 to 60 mean reach bankfull widths. Bankfull width, bankfull area, width:depth ratio, and channel stability increased in the downstream direction. Although there was no significant change in substrate size longitudinally, the percentage of gravel and cobble substrate increased and the percentage of bedrock decreased in the downstream direction. Bankfull discharge increased in the downstream direction, as expected. The majority of sites sampled were classified as Rosgen F4 stream types. The effective discharge (Qe) at the Big Cedar gaging station was estimated to be 4500 cubic feet per second (cfs) with a threshold discharge (Qt) of 0.1 cfs. The Antlers gaging station Qe was estimated to be 25,000 cfs with a Qt of 3.5 cfs. Deposition bar area below the Jackfork Creek tributary has increased over time.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyright by Berton James Seuil
    Copyright by Berton James Seuil 1956 THE UNIVERSITY OP " OKLAHOMA" “ 1 ! GRADUATE COLLEGE ORIGIN AND OCCURRENCE OF BARITE IN ARKANSAS A DISSERTATION \ SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE FACULTY in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY BY BERTON JAMES SCULL Norman, Oklahoma 1956 ORIGIN AND OCCURRENCE OF BARITE IN ARKANSAS APPROVED BY DISSERTATION COMMITTEE TABLE OP CONTENTS Page LIST OP T A BLES.................................. vl LIST OP ILLUSTRATIONS.................................. Vil Chapter I. INTRODUCTION............................ 1 General Statement .................... 1 Properties and Uses of Barite .............. 3 Scope of the Investigation.................. 6 Methods of Investigation.................. 7 Previous W o r k ................ o Current Work........................ 11 Geography.................................. 13 II. AREAL GEOLOGY................................ l6 General Statement ..... ................ l6 Stratigraphy................................ 17 General discussion.................. 17 Paleozoic r o c k s .................... 17 Bigfork chert .......................... 17 Polk Creek shale............ 19 Blaylock sandstone...................... 21 Missouri Mountain shale ................ 27 Arkansas novaculite . ................. 30 Stanley s h a l e ............... 37 Cretaceous rocks.................. 43 Trinity formation ................ 43 Woodbine formation.................... 46 Igneous rocks .......................... 47 Regional Structure.................... 52
    [Show full text]
  • A Subsurface Stratigraphic Study of the Middle Atoka, Sebastian County, Arkansas Sara Beth Sutton University of Arkansas, Fayetteville
    University of Arkansas, Fayetteville ScholarWorks@UARK Theses and Dissertations 8-2012 A Subsurface Stratigraphic Study of the Middle Atoka, Sebastian County, Arkansas Sara Beth Sutton University of Arkansas, Fayetteville Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd Part of the Geology Commons, and the Stratigraphy Commons Recommended Citation Sutton, Sara Beth, "A Subsurface Stratigraphic Study of the Middle Atoka, Sebastian County, Arkansas" (2012). Theses and Dissertations. 477. http://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd/477 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UARK. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UARK. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. A SUBSURFACE STRATIGRAPHIC STUDY OF THE MIDDLE ATOKA, SEBASTIAN COUNTY, ARKANSAS A SUBSURFACE STRATIGRAPHIC STUDY OF THE MIDDLE ATOKA, SEBASTIAN COUNTY, ARKANSAS A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Geology By Sara B. Sutton University of Arkansas Bachelor of Science in Geology, 2009 August 2012 University of Arkansas ABSTRACT Raster log images were analyzed to study the subsurface stratigraphy of the Middle Atoka in the Arkoma Basin of the western portion (Sebastian County) of Arkansas. The most significant sandstone units of the Middle Atoka in this area were determined to be two generally coarsening-upward sequences in the lower portion of the formation. Based on lithologic correlations, these two units were determined to be the informally named Casey and Freiburg members of the Middle Atoka. Thickness information based on picked tops was used to create isopach maps of the units of interest.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Resources Inventory Report, Hot Springs National Park
    National Park Service US Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Hot Springs National Park Geologic Resources Inventory Report Natural Resource Report NPS/NRSS/GRD/NRR—2013/741 ON THE COVER View from the top of the display spring down to the Arlington Lawn within Hot Springs National Park. THIS PAGE Gulpha Creek flows over Stanley Shale downstream from the Gulpha Gorge Campground. Photographs by Trista L. Thornberry-Ehrlich (Colorado State University) Hot Springs National Park Geologic Resources Inventory Report Natural Resource Report NPS/NRSS/GRD/NRR—2013/741 National Park Service Geologic Resources Division PO Box 25287 Denver, CO 80225 December 2013 US Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Report Series is used to disseminate high-priority, current natural resource management information with managerial application. The series targets a general, diverse audience, and may contain NPS policy considerations or address sensitive issues of management applicability. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner. This report received informal peer review by subject-matter experts who were not directly involved in the collection, analysis, or reporting of the data.
    [Show full text]
  • THE UNIVERSITY of Oklahœia GRADUATE COLLEGE the ATOKA FORMATION W the N Œ T H SIDE of the Mcalester BASIN a DISSERTATION SUBMI
    THE UNIVERSITY OF OKlAHŒiA GRADUATE COLLEGE THE ATOKA FORMATION W THE N Œ T H SIDE OF THE McALESTER BASIN A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE ŒIADUATE FACULTY in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY BY JACK GORDON BLYTHE Norman, Oklahoma 1957 THE ATOKA FORMATION ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE McALESTER BASIN APPROVED BY j /•) • DISSERTATION CCMMITTEE ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Dr. Carl C. Branson directed this dissertation problem. Dr. George G. Huffman, Dr. E. L. Lucas, Dr. Doris Curtis, and Dr. Reginald Harris contributed helpful advice and information. The Oklahoma Geo­ logical Survey employed the author as field geologist during the summer of 1954. Assistance was rendered in the field by Richard Beveridge during the month of June in 1953; and Mr. A. H. Hanson of Muskogee, Oklahoma, spent a portion of one day in the field with the author, directing his attention to several fossil localities in the Atoka for­ mation. Mr. Irwin Gold photographed the thin sections and the fossils, Mr. June D. King took some of the field photographs, Mr. Raymond Kune instructed the author in certain procedures of drafting, and Mr. Roy Davis and Mr. Kent Gregg assisted with much of the drafting. The author's wife, Ruth, assisted in certain phases of the field work, typed preliminary drafts of the dissertation, and continually en­ couraged the author during all phases of the dissertation program. Ill TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS .................................... vi LIST OF MAPS xiii Chapter I . INTRODUCTION 1 II. STRATIGRAPHY 10 III. SEDIMENTATIOMAL ASPECTS AND ENVIRONMENTS OF DEPOSITION 52 IV.
    [Show full text]
  • Italic Page Numbers Indicate Major References]
    Index [Italic page numbers indicate major references] Abbott Formation, 411 379 Bear River Formation, 163 Abo Formation, 281, 282, 286, 302 seismicity, 22 Bear Springs Formation, 315 Absaroka Mountains, 111 Appalachian Orogen, 5, 9, 13, 28 Bearpaw cyclothem, 80 Absaroka sequence, 37, 44, 50, 186, Appalachian Plateau, 9, 427 Bearpaw Mountains, 111 191,233,251, 275, 377, 378, Appalachian Province, 28 Beartooth Mountains, 201, 203 383, 409 Appalachian Ridge, 427 Beartooth shelf, 92, 94 Absaroka thrust fault, 158, 159 Appalachian Shelf, 32 Beartooth uplift, 92, 110, 114 Acadian orogen, 403, 452 Appalachian Trough, 460 Beaver Creek thrust fault, 157 Adaville Formation, 164 Appalachian Valley, 427 Beaver Island, 366 Adirondack Mountains, 6, 433 Araby Formation, 435 Beaverhead Group, 101, 104 Admire Group, 325 Arapahoe Formation, 189 Bedford Shale, 376 Agate Creek fault, 123, 182 Arapien Shale, 71, 73, 74 Beekmantown Group, 440, 445 Alabama, 36, 427,471 Arbuckle anticline, 327, 329, 331 Belden Shale, 57, 123, 127 Alacran Mountain Formation, 283 Arbuckle Group, 186, 269 Bell Canyon Formation, 287 Alamosa Formation, 169, 170 Arbuckle Mountains, 309, 310, 312, Bell Creek oil field, Montana, 81 Alaska Bench Limestone, 93 328 Bell Ranch Formation, 72, 73 Alberta shelf, 92, 94 Arbuckle Uplift, 11, 37, 318, 324 Bell Shale, 375 Albion-Scioio oil field, Michigan, Archean rocks, 5, 49, 225 Belle Fourche River, 207 373 Archeolithoporella, 283 Belt Island complex, 97, 98 Albuquerque Basin, 111, 165, 167, Ardmore Basin, 11, 37, 307, 308, Belt Supergroup, 28, 53 168, 169 309, 317, 318, 326, 347 Bend Arch, 262, 275, 277, 290, 346, Algonquin Arch, 361 Arikaree Formation, 165, 190 347 Alibates Bed, 326 Arizona, 19, 43, 44, S3, 67.
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Resources of the Caney Creek Wilderness, Polk County, Arkansas
    ~ f./ , STUDIES RELATED TO WILDERNESS · I Mineral Resources of the Caney Creek Wilderness, Polk County, Arkansas By GEORGE E. ERICKSEN and SAM H. PATTERSON U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY and by MAYNARD L. DUNN, JR., and DONALD K. HARRISON, U.S. BUREAU OF MINES STUDIES RELATED TO WILDERNESS- WILDERNESS AREAS GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1551 An evaluation of the mineral potential of the area UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON: 1988 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR JAMES G. WATT, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Main entry under title: Mineral resources of the Caney Creek Wilderness, Polk County, Arkansas. (Geological Survey bulletin; 1551) Bibliography: p. Supt. of Docs. no.: I 19.3:1551 1. Mines and mineral resources-Arkansas-Caney Creek Wilderness. 2. Caney Creek Wilderness (Ark.) I. Ericksen, George Edward. II. Series. QU75.B9 no. 1551 557.3s [553'.09767'45] 83-8868 [TN 24.A7] For sale by the Distribution Branch, U.S. Geological Survey, 604 South Pickett Street, Alexandria, VA 22304 STUDIES RELATED TO WILDERNESS AREAS In accordance with the provisions of the Wilderness Act (Public Law 88-577, September 3, 1964) and the Joint Con­ ference Report on Senate Bill 4, 88th Congress, the U.S. Geological Survey and U.S. Bureau of Mines have been con- · ducting mineral surveys of wilderness and primitive areas. Studies and reports of all primitive areas have been com­ pleted. Areas officially designated as uwilderness, .. uwild," or ucanoe" when the Act was passed were incorporated into the National Wilderness Preservation System, and some of them are presently being studied.
    [Show full text]