DOCSLIB.ORG

Text of Speeches Delivered in English and of the Interpretation of Speeches Delivered in the Other Languages

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Text of Speeches Delivered in English and of the Interpretation of Speeches Delivered in the Other Languages United Nations A/60/PV.77 General Assembly Official Records Sixtieth session 77th plenary meeting Friday, 28 April 2006, 10 a.m. New York President: Mr. Eliasson ........................................... (Sweden) In the absence of the President, Mr. Hamidon (c) Strengthening of international cooperation and (Malaysia), Vice-President, took the Chair. coordination of efforts to study, mitigate and minimize the consequences of the Chernobyl The meeting was called to order at 10.20 a.m. disaster: special commemorative meeting in observance of the twentieth anniversary of the Agenda item 128 (continued) Chernobyl catastrophe The Acting President: This morning the General Scale of assessments for the apportionment of the Assembly, in accordance with Assembly resolution expenses of the United Nations (A/60/650/Add.8 and 60/14 of 14 November 2005, will hold a special A/60/650/Add.9) commemorative meeting in observance of the The Acting President: I would like to invite the twentieth anniversary of the Chernobyl catastrophe. attention of the General Assembly to documents Members will recall that the Assembly concluded A/60/650/Add.8 and A/60/650/Add.9, in which the its consideration of sub-item (c) of agenda item 73 at Secretary-General informs the President of the General its 52nd plenary meeting, held on 14 November 2005. Assembly that, since the issuance of his In order for the General Assembly to hold the communications contained in document A/60/650 and commemorative meeting today, it will be necessary to addenda 1 to 7, Papua New Guinea and Seychelles reopen consideration of the sub-item. May I take it that have made the necessary payments to reduce their it is the wish of the General Assembly to reopen arrears below the amount specified in Article 19 of the consideration of sub-item (c) of agenda item 73? Charter. It was so decided. May I take it that the General Assembly duly takes note of the information contained in those The Acting President: May I further take it that documents? the Assembly agrees to proceed immediately to hold the special commemorative meeting under sub-item (c) It was so decided. of agenda item 73? Agenda item 73 (continued) In the absence of objection, we shall proceed accordingly. Strengthening of the coordination of humanitarian On behalf of the President of the General and disaster relief assistance of the United Nations, Assembly, it is my honour to welcome all participants including special economic assistance to this special commemorative meeting of the General This record contains the text of speeches delivered in English and of the interpretation of speeches delivered in the other languages. Corrections should be submitted to the original languages only. They should be incorporated in a copy of the record and sent under the signature of a member of the delegation concerned to the Chief of the Verbatim Reporting Service, room C-154A. Corrections will be issued after the end of the session in a consolidated corrigendum. 06-33162 (E) *0633162* A/60/PV.77 Assembly to observe the twentieth anniversary of the system and other international actors to reflect on Chernobyl catastrophe. On 26 April 1986, the worst lessons learned and to make proposals on future nuclear accident in history occurred at the Chernobyl actions in response to the disaster. May today’s event nuclear power plant in Ukraine. Since then, Chernobyl also serve to remind us of the need for international has become a symbol of shattering human tragedy and solidarity whenever and wherever international devastating environmental damage. disasters occur. In today’s world, the crucial challenges are borderless. Today we have gathered here to honour the memory of the victims of the Chernobyl catastrophe. It Before proceeding further, I should like to consult is also an occasion to remember the heroism of the Member States about inviting Mr. Kemal Derviş, emergency workers who responded in the days Administrator of the United Nations Development following the disaster, the deprivation of more than Programme and United Nations Coordinator of 330,000 residents of the area who were evacuated from International Cooperation on Chernobyl, and Mrs. Ann contaminated regions and the suffering of millions of Veneman, Executive Director of the United Nations people living in affected areas, who over the past two Children’s Fund, to make statements on this occasion. decades have had to cope with the physical and If there is no objection, may I take it that it is the psychological effects of the accident. wish of the General Assembly, without setting a Alongside Governments, non-governmental precedent, to invite Mr. Kemal Derviş, Administrator organizations and other international organizations, the of the United Nations Development Programme and United Nations and its funds, programmes and United Nations Coordinator of International agencies have been involved in Chernobyl relief and Cooperation on Chernobyl, and Mrs. Ann Veneman, recovery efforts from the very beginning. In the Executive Director of the United Nations Children’s aftermath of the catastrophe, the assistance efforts of Fund, to make statements at this special the United Nations family were, naturally, targeted to commemorative meeting? meet the large-scale humanitarian needs. Over time the It was so decided. emphasis of those efforts has shifted, and the United Nations family has, since 2002, focused on promoting The Acting President: In accordance with the the social and economic development of the affected decision just taken, and without setting a precedent, I communities. now give the floor to Mr. Kemal Derviş, Administrator of the United Nations Development Programme and The legacy of the Chernobyl catastrophe remains United Nations Coordinator of International strong. The effects of radioactive contamination are Cooperation on Chernobyl. still being felt 20 years later in the affected region. There are ongoing international efforts to study, Mr. Derviş (United Nations Development mitigate and minimize the consequences of the Programme): It is an honour to have this opportunity to Chernobyl disaster. Here, I would like to recognize the address this body today, as we mark 20 years since the important contributions of the Chernobyl Forum, a world’s worst nuclear accident occurred at the collective effort by eight organizations within the Chernobyl nuclear power plant. United Nations system and the Governments of the As the United Nations Coordinator of most affected countries — Belarus, the Russian International Cooperation on Chernobyl, I am pleased Federation and Ukraine — to analyse the health, that the United Nations has been able to play a environmental and socio-economic impacts of the prominent role in the many commemorative events that nuclear accident. have been held to mark this solemn twentieth On this solemn occasion, as we observe the anniversary. It is an occasion both to remember the twentieth anniversary of the Chernobyl catastrophe, we enormous human costs of the Chernobyl disaster and to should also look forward and pay attention to the take stock of the many problems that linger two continuing needs of the affected region. In the past 10 decades later. It is also time to look ahead and seek days, two major international conferences on solutions that hold the promise of hope and recovery Chernobyl, held in Minsk and in Kiev, have gathered for the 5 million residents of the Chernobyl-affected representatives of Governments and the United Nations areas. 2 06-33162 A/60/PV.77 Chernobyl was a devastating tragedy. Hundreds Atomic Radiation, UNICEF, the United Nations of emergency workers risked their lives in responding Environment Programme, the Office for the to the accident, and some, sadly, perished. Hundreds of Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, the United thousands laboured to build a shelter around the Nations Development Programme (UNDP) and the damaged reactor. More than 330,000 people were World Bank. uprooted from their towns and villages. Five thousand United Nations Member States — particularly people who were children at the time of the accident Canada, the European Union, Japan, Switzerland and have contracted thyroid cancer. Millions in the region the United States — have also been generous were left traumatized by lingering fears about their contributors to Chernobyl recovery efforts. I would health. We should never forget the loss and pain caused like to express my deep gratitude for their invaluable by the disaster. support. The impact of the accident and the policies However, much more remains to be done to adopted to mitigate its consequences were compounded promote the region’s recovery. Renewed efforts should by the disintegration of the Soviet Union. The region’s gain new impetus from the findings of the United mostly rural economy was devastated. Livelihoods lost Nations Chernobyl Forum. The Forum, an authoritative 20 years ago have not yet been recovered. Farming body composed of representatives of eight United villages have struggled to overcome the stigma of Nations agencies and the three most affected living in a contaminated region. Many communities Governments, recently concluded that most of the have sunk into resignation and apathy. 5 million people who live in Chernobyl-affected areas In recounting the enormous human costs of the need not live in fear of radiation. Many of the areas Chernobyl tragedy, however, it is important to previously designated as contaminated are now suitable remember that, while this is undoubtedly a for habitation and cultivation, although precautions are tremendously sad commemoration, it is not a hopeless still necessary in some areas. Those findings mean that one. Much has been done to cope with the legacy of many affected communities can regain the confidence Chernobyl. Granted, the initial silence on the accident they need to return to a normal life. Copies of the was reprehensible, and most Soviet citizens — as well Chernobyl Forum report are available at the side of the as the international community — remained unaware General Assembly Hall.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • General Assembly Distr.: General 27 September 2019
    United Nations A/74/461 General Assembly Distr.: General 27 September 2019 Original: English . Seventy-fourth session Agenda item 71 (d) Strengthening of the coordination of humanitarian and disaster relief assistance of the United Nations, including special economic assistance: strengthening of international cooperation and coordination of efforts to study, mitigate and minimize the consequences of the Chernobyl disaster Persistent legacy of the Chernobyl disaster Report of the Secretary-General Summary The present report is submitted in accordance with General Assembly resolution 71/125 on the persistent legacy of the Chernobyl disaster and provides an update on the progress made in the implementation of all aspects of the resolution. The report provides an overview of the recovery and development activities undertaken by the agencies, funds and programmes of the United Nations system and other international actors to address the consequences of the Chernobyl disaster. The United Nations system remains committed to promoting the principle of leaving no one behind and ensuring that the governmental efforts to support the affected regions are aimed at achieving the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and the Sustainable Development Goals. 19-16688 (E) 041019 151019 *1916688* A/74/461 I. General situation 1. Since the Chernobyl nuclear plant accident on 26 April 1986, the United Nations, along with the Governments of Belarus, the Russian Federation and Ukraine, has been leading the recovery and development efforts to support the affected regions. While extensive humanitarian work was conducted immediately after the accident, additional recovery and rehabilitation activities were conducted in the following years to secure the area, limit the exposure of the population, provide medical follow-up to those affected and study the health consequences of the incident.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposal by Tobias
    International Conference, 23-25 April 2006, House of the Teacher, Volodymyrska 57, Kyiv / Ukraine „Chornobyl is a word we would all like to erase from our memory. It [opened] a Pandora's box of invisible enemies and nameless anxieties in people's minds, but which most of us probably now think of as safely relegated to the past. Yet there are two compelling reasons why this tragedy must not be forgotten. First, if we forget Chornobyl, we increase the risk of more such technological and environmental disasters in the future. Second, more than seven million of our fellow human beings do not have the luxury of forgetting. They are still suffering, every day, as a result of what happened 14 years ago. Indeed, the legacy of Chornobyl will be with us, and with our descendants, for generations to come." Kofi Annan, April 2000 On the occasion of the 20th anniversary of the Chornobyl nuclear disaster, the Heinrich Böll Stiftung (Berlin), Ecoclub (Rivne, Ukraine), The Greens/EFA in the European Parliament, the Nuclear Information and Resource Service (Washington, DC), the World Information Service on Energy (Amsterdam), IPPNW (Germany) and Bündnis 90/DIE GRÜNEN (Germany) are inviting independent scientists, environmentalists, non-governmental organizations and sustainable energy experts from all over the world for the international conference „Chornobyl + 20 – Remembrance for the Future“ to take place in Kyiv/Ukraine on April 23-25. The conference will focus on three areas: First, the ongoing catastrophe of Chornobyl and its continuing consequences, including the release of a new study which reviews and analyzes the recently published report of the IAEA and WHO; second, the continuing safety, economic, proliferation and other problems posed by nuclear power generally; and third, the development of a roadmap to a sustainable energy future.
    [Show full text]
  • Construction of the Protective Shelter for the Chernobyl Nuclear Reactor Faces Schedule Delays, Potential Cost Increases, and Technical Uncertainties
    United States Government Accountability Office Report to the Ranking Member, GAO Subcommittee on National Security and Foreign Affairs, Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, House of Representatives July 2007 NUCLEAR SAFETY Construction of the Protective Shelter for the Chernobyl Nuclear Reactor Faces Schedule Delays, Potential Cost Increases, and Technical Uncertainties GAO-07-923 July 2007 NUCLEAR SAFETY Accountability Integrity Reliability Highlights Construction of the Protective Shelter for Highlights of GAO-07-923, a report to the the Chernobyl Nuclear Reactor Faces Ranking Member, Subcommittee on National Security and Foreign Affairs, Schedule Delays, Potential Cost Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, House of Representatives Increases, and Technical Uncertainties Why GAO Did This Study What GAO Found In 1986, an explosion at the Although two of three construction components—site preparation and Chernobyl nuclear power plant in stabilization of the existing shelter—are nearly finished, construction of the Ukraine destroyed the reactor new shelter has fallen about 7 years behind schedule. Over the past couple building and released massive of years, the main reason for schedule slippage has been the failure to award amounts of radioactive a construction contract. The lack of a contract is partly the result of a contamination. A temporary lengthy disagreement between Ukraine and the European Bank for shelter was built over the damaged reactor to prevent further Reconstruction and Development (EBRD). In late 2006, the Chernobyl contamination. The United States nuclear power plant director told GAO that the donors should not make any is a major donor to an international additional contributions to the project until contracting issues were project to build a new shelter to resolved.
    [Show full text]
  • Chernobyl: Chronology of a Disaster
    MARCH 11, 2011 | No. 724 CHERNOBYL: CHRONOLOGY OF A DISASTER CHERNOBYL; CHRONOLOGY OF A DISASTER 1 INHOUD: 1- An accident waiting to happen 2 2- The accident and immediate consequences ( 1986 – 1989) 4 3- Trying to minimize the consequences (1990 – 2000) 8 4- Aftermath: no lessons learned (2001 - 2011) 5- Postscript 18 Chernobyl - 200,000 sq km contaminated; 600,000 liquidators; $200 billion in damage; 350,000 people evacuated; 50 mln Ci of radiation. Are you ready to pay this price for the development of nuclear power? (Poster by Ecodefence, 2011) 1 At 1.23 hr on April 26, 1986, the fourth reactor of the Cherno- power plants are designed to withstand natural disasters (hur- byl nuclear power plant exploded. ricanes, fl oods, earthquakes, etc.) and to withstand aircraft The disaster was a unique industrial accident due to the crash and blasts from outside. The safety is increased by scale of its social, economic and environmental impacts and the possibility in Russia to select a site far away from bigger longevity. It is estimated that, in Ukraine, Belarus and Russia towns." (page 647: "Zur Betriebssicherheit sind die Kraftwerke alone, around 9 million people were directly affected resulting (VVER and RBMK) mit drei parallel arbeitenden Sicherheit- from the fact that the long lived radioactivity released was systeme ausgeruested. Die Kraftwerke sing gegen Naturka- more than 200 times that of the atomic bombs dropped on tastrophen (Orkane, Ueberschwemmungen, Erdbeben, etc) Hiroshima and Nagasaki. und gegen Flugzeugabsturz und Druckwellen von aussen ausgelegt. Die Sicherheit wird noch durch die in Russland Across the former Soviet Union the contamination resulted in moegliche Standortauswahl, KKW in gewisser Entfernung van evacuation of some 400,000 people.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF: Transforming Chernobyl
    The works to transform Chernobyl into a safe and on the ground. Total costs for the Shelter secure state are nearing conclusion. The New Implementation Plan – of which the NSC is the Safe Confinement (NSC), a gigantic steel arch, most prominent element – were estimated to be has been erected and is now being equipped €2.1 billion in 2014, leaving a large funding gap with systems and tools to make the site safe for of €615 million. generations to come. The EBRD shareholders’ decision in November Impressive progress has been made and we are 2014 to commit an additional €350 million confident that the NSC will be completed and (from the Bank’s reserves) for the NSC and operational by the end of 2017. an anticipated €165 million from the G7/ European Commission have significantly The Chernobyl project would not have been reduced the funding gap. However, a shortfall of possible without the active involvement and €100 million remains. generous contributions of the international community and Ukraine. The fact that to date Ukraine is currently in a vulnerable state and more than 40 countries and the EBRD have cannot be left to bear this uniquely hazardous provided funds speaks for itself. burden alone. The EBRD welcomes the leadership of the G7 to secure the full funding As the project is now far-advanced it is possible of the project. to make a reliable cost estimate based on the final design of the NSC and the progress Suma Chakrabarti, EBRD President PART OF A LARGER The New Safe Confinement (NSC) is a structure intended to the international community’s work together with Ukraine cover the destroyed reactor unit 4 at Chernobyl, the site of got under way.
    [Show full text]
  • The Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant Accident : Its Decommissioning, The
    The Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant accident : its decommissioning, the Interim Spent Fuel Storage ISF-2, the nuclear waste treatment plants and the Safe Confinement project. by Dr. Ing. Fulcieri Maltini Ph.D. SMIEEE, life, PES, Comsoc FM Consultants Associates, France Keywords Nuclear power, Disaster engineering, Decommissioning, Waste management & disposal, Buildings, structures & design. Abstract On April 26, 1986, the Unit 4 of the RBMK nuclear power plant of Chernobyl, in Ukraine, went out of control during a test at low-power, leading to an explosion and fire. The reactor building was totally demolished and very large amounts of radiation were released into the atmosphere for several hundred miles around the site including the nearby town of Pripyat. The explosion leaving tons of nuclear waste and spent fuel residues without any protection and control. Several square kilometres were totally contaminated. Several hundred thousand people were affected by the radiation fall out. The radioactive cloud spread across Europe affecting most of the northern, eastern, central and southern Europe. The initiative of the G7 countries to launch an important programme for the closure of some Soviet built nuclear plants was accepted by several countries. A team of engineers was established within the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development were a fund was provided by the donor countries for the entire design, management of all projects and the plants decommissioning. The Chernobyl programme includes the establishment of a safety strategy for the entire site remediation and the planning for the plant decommissioning. Several facilities that will process and store the spent fuel and the radioactive liquid and solid waste as well as to protect the plant damaged structures have been designed and are under construction.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Contribution to EBRD Chernobyl Shelter Fund: 4Th Pledge, 5Th Instalment
    Community Contribution to EBRD Chernobyl Shelter Fund: 4th Pledge, 5th Instalment Description Background The Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant (ChNPP) is situated 110 Km north of Kiev. Its construction began in the 1970s and by 1983 four units were in operation producing about 10 percent of Ukraine’s electricity. Two additional units were under construction. On 26 April 1986, the world’s worst nuclear accident occurred, which destroyed Unit 4 of the power plant and resulted in the release of radioactive materials into the environment. The nearby city of Chernobyl, located about 15 km away from the power plant had a population of 12,500, but the city was not the residence of the power plant workers. When the power plant was under construction, Prypiat, a city larger and closer to the power plant, had been built as home for the power plant workers. It had a population of just under 50,000 at the time of the accident. Evacuation of the population of Prypiat began about 40 hours after the accident. Later other population areas within a 30km radius were evacuated, including the city of Chernobyl. By 14th May 1986, some 116,000 people had been evacuated. In the years following the accident, a further 220,000 people were resettled into less contaminated areas, and the initial 30 km radius exclusion zone (2800 km2) was modified and extended to cover about 4300 km2. Following the accident a Shelter (sometimes referred to as a ‘sarcophagus’) enclosing the remains of ChNPP Unit 4 was constructed under exceedingly hazardous conditions. Units 1, 2 and 3 (adjacent to Unit 4) were put back into operation, raising the fear of another accident.
    [Show full text]
  • 96/6 CHERNOBYL -10 YEARS on a Conference on Radiological
    IE9700001 RPII - 96/6 CHERNOBYL -10 YEARS ON A Conference on Radiological Protection and a Review of the Health Consequences of the Chernobyl Accident Proceedings of a Conference organised by the Radiological Protection Institute of Ireland and held in Dublin, 30 April 1996 October 1996 3 Clonskeagh Square, Clonskeagh Road, Dublin 14. Tel: +353 1 269 7766. Telex: 30610. Radiological Protection Institute of Ireland Fax: +353 1 269 7437. An Institiuid Eireannach um Chosaint Raideolaioch Chernobyl - 10 Years On A Conference on Radiological Protection and a Review of the Health Consequences of the Chernobyl Accident Opening Address 1 Mr. Emmet Stagg, T.D., Minister of State, Department of Transport,Energy and Communications Session I: Keynote Lecture Chernobyl: The health consequences. Dr. Peter J. Waight (Canada,Consultant to World Health Organisation). 6 Session II: Environmental radioactivity in Ireland Chernobyl-related research and radiological protection activities in Ireland. 24 Dr. Barbara Rafferty (Radioecology Research Group, RPI1) and Mr. John D. Cunningham (Assistant Chief Executive, RPH). The discharges from Sellafield - how big a risk for the Irish population? 34 Dr. Tom O'Flaherty (Chief Executive, RPIl). Natural radiation hazards - radon in the home and in the workplace. 43 Dr. James P. McLaughlin (Physics Dept., University College, Dublin). Session III: Applications of ionising radiation - evaluating the hazards Radiation hazards in medicine, industry and education. 53 Mr. Christopher Hone (Manager, Regulatory Service, RPIl). Nuclear installations abroad - the accident risks, and their potential consequences for Ireland. 60 Mr. Frank J. Turvey (Assistant Chief Executive, RPIl). Session IV: Radioactive wastes and emergency preparedness The legacy to future generations - long-lived radioactive wastes and plant decommissioning.
    [Show full text]
  • International Initiative for the Chernobyl
    GC(41)/RES/21 October 1997 International Atomic Energy Agency GENERAL Distr. GENERAL CONFERENCE Original: ENGLISH Forty-first regular session Agenda item 22 (GC(41)/28) INTERNATIONAL INITIATIVE FOR THE CHERNOBYL SARCOPHAGUS Resolution adopted on 3 October 1997 during the 9th plenary meeting INTERNATIONAL INITIATIVE FOR THE CHERNOBYL SARCOPHAGUS The General Conference. (a) Recalling the Chernobyl accident of 1986, which destroyed Reactor 4 of the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant, (b) Mindful that the sarcophagus enclosing the remains of Reactor 4 was built under extremely adverse conditions, was intended to serve only as an interim measure and does not represent a long-term solution to the problems posed by the destroyed reactor, (c) Noting that the Group of 7 and Ukraine have adopted the Shelter Implementation Plan developed by an international team of experts to transform the sarcophagus to an environmentally safer condition over the long term, (d) Noting that Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom, the United States and the European Union are committed to raise US$300 million to support the approximately US$750 million Shelter Implementation Plan and that Ukraine will contribute in kind, and (e) Aware that Ukraine currently expends nearly 12 per cent of its national budget on dealing with consequences of the Chernobyl accident, 1. Welcomes the decision of the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development to establish the Chernobyl Shelter Fund, to administer the implementation of the Shelter Implementation Plan and to convene meetings at least annually of the countries contributing to the Fund for the purpose of reviewing and approving projects to implement the Plan; and GC(41)/RES/21 page 2 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Reception UN Chernobyl
    Statement by Kathy Ryan, Chernobyl Children International, Reception “Rarely does a single word become so powerful, that it can tell the story of a million lives. Chernobyl is one such word.” This is Irish Foreign Minister Charlie Flanagan endorsing the International Chernobyl Disaster Remembrance Day earlier this week. For many of us here, the adoption of this day of commemoration is the culmination of over 3 decades of work. This day will be our legacy to the generations of people who have been, and will continue to be, affected by the world’s worst nuclear disaster. Thank you, Ambassador Dapkiunas, and the Permanent Mission of the Republic of Belarus to the United Nations, for the coordination of these important commemorations. Adi Roche and Ali Hewson wish they could be here, but they are in Belarus right now with a team of medical volunteers, and in Ukraine tomorrow. Also this week, our convoy will deliver aid throughout Belarus, and a team of international cardiac surgeons will save children’s lives in Kharkiv, Ukraine. This exhibition is a great reflection of both the human and environmental impact of the disaster. While we rightfully celebrate the healing power of compassion, compassion is not enough. We must remain vigilant in our commitment to ensure that Chernobyl becomes progressively safer. A sobering thought: While the decrepit sarcophagus has been confined, 180 tons of radioactive material is still rumbling inside, material that will be toxic for the next 3000 years. The international community must prioritize the environmental and technological challenges of dealing with this deadly legacy.
    [Show full text]
  • EDAV (Educazione Audiovisiva) Sussidio Mensile Di «Lettura» Dei Media E D’Uso Dei Loro Linguaggi Fondato Da NAZARENO TADDEI S.J
    EDAV (Educazione Audiovisiva) sussidio mensile di «lettura» dei media e d’uso dei loro linguaggi fondato da NAZARENO TADDEI S.J. diretto dal luglio 2006 da Andrea Fagioli edito dal CiSCS Centro internazionale dello Spettacolo e della Comunicazione Sociale - Roma (*) Indice di indici di 37 anni dal 1972-73 al 2009 a cura di Bruno Michelon INDICE ...ARGUTA PUBBLICITÀ..., [figura], n. 85, p. 1 ...FIORI... di NaT, [foto di copertina], n. 216, p. 1-2 ...LASSA STAR I SANTI, (pubblicità che crea mentalità), [vetrinetta dei media (a cura di Nazareno Taddei S.J.) – pubblicità], n. 296, p. 18 ?BERLUSCONI? di NaT, [foto di copertina], n. 223, p. 1-2 «...ED È ANCORA AMORE» (DA UN CALENDARIO DI GIANNI BELLESIA) di Achille Abramo Saporiti, [foto di copertina – lettura foto], n. 326, pp. 1-2 «‖IN ALTUM‖ LEGGENDO I FILM» di Nazareno Taddei S.J., [studio]: 1. LA SITUAZIONE: MA PERCHÉ?, n. 286, pag. 2 2. USCIRE DALLA NEBBIA, n. 287, pag. 6 3. ANCORA DELLA MENTALITÀ… E NON SOLO, n. 288, pag. 3 4. «NUOVI MODI DI COMUNICARE», n. 289-90, pag. 3 5. LA «LETTURA (STRUTTURALE)» È UNA POSSIBILE SOLUZIONE, n. 291, p. 3 6. «LEGGERE FILM PER FORMARE LA PERSONA»: 1° L‘ASPETTO TEORICO, n. 292, p. 3 Appendice: a) I FILM CHE PIACEVANO A LUCIANO TAGLIAVINI di Eugenio Bicocchi, [studio], n. 292, p. 7 b) THELMA E LOUISE di Ridley Scott (n. 1937), (Olinto Brugnoli), [lettura – film], n. 292, p. 8 7. «LEGGERE FILM PER FORMARE LA PERSONA: 2° L‘ASPETTO METODOLOGICO», n. 294, p. 7 8. «LEGGERE FILM PER FORMARE LA PERSONA: APPENDICE», n.
    [Show full text]
  • Chernobyl Disaster to the Students, a Devastating Explosion That Occurred in Reactor 4 in 1986
    Talk with Adi Roche The TY students of Loreto were very lucky to receive a talk from Adi Roche, an Irish anti- nuclear advocate who has inspired millions. This talk was organised with the help of Ms. Pheasey. On the 24th of February at 12 o’ clock, Adi sat in front of over 100 Loreto TY students digitally. The pupils were waiting to be inspired by her powerful words and she did not disappoint. Adi started her speech off explaining to the girls about her passion of the Earth and how she was amazed by its incredible beauty. She went on to say how we can all get overwhelmed by the negative messages and tragedies we hear on social media on the news. Every day, we hear so much despair and darkness in our daily lives and how this can lead us to feel numb and helpless to the things we hear, making us believe that there is no solution. Adi emphasised that when we feel like this, to “remember the power of the human spirit” and that we can bring greater hope to the next generation. Adi then commented on the generosity of the Irish spirit and how every Irish generation produces groups of people who have a burning passion to work with and reach out to people in need around the world. “Our World is a living entity”, Adi stated and explained that while looking at Earth from afar, you could see no boundaries, conflict, damage, or war. She told us that this realisation had awakened her to the complexity of our planet.
    [Show full text]