DOCSLIB.ORG

Annual Review 2014 IATA ANNUAL REVIEW 2014

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Annual Review 2014 IATA ANNUAL REVIEW 2014 Annual Review 2014 IATA ANNUAL REVIEW 2014 Tony Tyler Director General & CEO International Air Transport Association Annual Review 2014 70th Annual General Meeting Doha, June 2014 Note: Unless specified otherwise, all dollar ($) figures refer to US dollars (US$). CoNTENTs 4 6 8 10 12 16 Members List Chairman’s Message Director General’s 100 Years of Industry Story Benefits of Aviation Message Aviation in 2013 19 25 28 34 40 44 Safety Security Regulation Infrastructure Environment Cargo and Taxation 48 53 55 58 Passenger Financial Services Aviation Solutions IATA Offices Experience mEmbERs LIsT Air Vanuatu Euroatlantic Airways a AirbridgeCargo Airlines c European Air Transport i Aircalin Eurowings AbsA Cargo Airline Airlink C.A.L. Cargo Airlines EVA Air Iberia Adria Airways Alaska Airlines Cargojet Airways Icelandair Aegean Airlines Alitalia Cargolux InselAir Aer Lingus All Nippon Airways Caribbean Airlines Interair Aero República Almasria Universal Airlines Carpatair f Intersky Aeroflot ALs Cathay Pacific Iran Air Aerolineas Argentinas American Airlines China Airlines Federal Express Iran Aseman Airlines Aeromexico Arik Air China Cargo Airlines Fiji Airways Israir Airline Afriqiyah Airways Arkia Israeli Airlines China Eastern Finnair Aigle Azur Asiana Airlines China southern Airlines flybe Air Algerie Atlas Air CityJet Freebird Airlines Air Arabia Atlasjet Airlines Comair j Air Astana Austral Condor Air Austral Austrian Copa Airlines Japan Airlines Air baltic AVIANCA Corsair International g Jazeera Airways Air berlin Avianca brasil Croatia Airlines Jet Airways Air botswana Azerbaijan Airlines Cubana Garuda Jet Lite (India) Limited Air Caledonie Cyprus Airways Georgian Airways Jetblue Air Canada Czech Airlines Gulf Air Jordan Aviation Air China Limited JsC Aircompany Yakutia Air Corsica b JsC Nordavia-RA Air Europa Juneyao Airlines Air France b&H Airlines d h Air India bangkok Air Air Koryo belavia - belarusian Airlines Delta Air Lines Hahn Air Air macau belle Air DHL Air Hainan Airlines k Air madagascar biman DHL Aviation Hawaiian Airlines Air malta binter Canarias Donavia Hi Fly Kenya Airways Air mauritius blue Panorama Dragonair Hong Kong Airlines Kish Air Air moldova blue1 Hong Kong Express Airways KLm Air Namibia bmi Regional Korean Air Air New Zealand british Airways Kuwait Airways Air Niugini brussels Airlines e Air Nostrum bulgaria air Air one Egyptair Air sERbIA a.d.beograd EL AL Air seychelles Emirates Air Tahiti Estonian Air Air Tahiti Nui Ethiopian Airlines Air Transat Etihad Airways 4 mEmbERs LIsT l n r t v LACsA NIKI Rossiya Airlines TAAG - Angola Airlines Vietnam Airlines LAm - Linhas Aéreas de Nile Air Royal Air maroc TACA Virgin Atlantic Moçambique Nippon Cargo Airlines (NCA) Royal brunei TACA Peru Virgin Australia LAN Airlines Nouvelair Royal Jordanian TACV Cabo Verde Airlines Vladivostok Air LAN Argentina TAm - Transportes Aéreos Volaris LAN Cargo del mercosur Volga-Dnepr Airlines LAN Perú TAm Linhas Aéreas VRG Linhas Aéreas LAN Ecuador o s TAmE - Linea Aérea del Ecuador Libyan Airlines TAP Portugal LLC “NoRD WIND” olympic Air sAA – south African Airways TARom LoT Polish Airlines oman Air safair Thai Airways International Lufthansa onur Air safi Airways THY - Turkish Airlines w Lufthansa Cargo sAs Tianjin Airlines Lufthansa CityLine sATA Air Açores TmA – Trans mediterranean White Airways Luxair sATA Internaçional Airways Wideroe p saudi Arabian Airlines TNT Airways shandong Airlines Transaero PAL – Philippine Airlines shanghai Airlines TransAsia Airways m Pegasus Airlines shenzhen Airlines TUIfly x PGA-Portugália Airlines sIA – singapore Airlines Tunis Air mahan Air PIA – Pakistan sIA Cargo Xiamen Airlines malaysia Airlines International Airlines siberia Airlines malmö Aviation Precision Air sichuan Airlines martinair Cargo PrivatAir silkair u mAs AIR south African Express Airways y mEA – middle East Airlines sriLankan Airlines Ukraine International Airlines meridiana fly sudan Airways United Airlines Yemenia mIAT- mongolian Airlines q sunExpress UPs Airlines montenegro Airlines surinam Airways Us Airways, Inc. Qantas sWISS UT air Qatar Airways sYPHAX AIRLINEs z syrianair 5 ChairmAN richard AndersoN Commercial aviation, catalyst for change In 2014, airlines will safely transport some 3.3 billion passengers and 50 million metric tons of cargo across a network of almost 50,000 routes. This connectivity has an immense economic footprint—58 million jobs and $2.4 trillion of business activity. over a third of the value of goods traded internationally is delivered by air. This year, we are celebrating the centennial of scheduled commercial aviation. In just 100 years, aviation has become an essential part of our global infrastructure. It has also been a catalyst for change. by turning our big planet into a global community, aviation has had a transformational impact on how we live together. The exchange of ideas, cultures, and experiences enriches us. Prosperity is spread by people working together in 6 ChairmAN richard AndersoN global supply chains. And uncountable opportunities— The IATA settlement systems (ISS) play an important role Government inaction on such critical issues as delivering human and economic—are generated by the freedom to be in the global distribution of airline products. Fully 46% of Next Gen air traffic management in the United states or the almost anywhere in a short 24 hours. airline passenger revenues are channeled reliably through single European sky in Europe is equally problematic. The the billing and settlement Plan (bsP). inefficiency of European air traffic management is a burden Aviation is a romantic industry with very practical purposes. on the airline industry and a ¤5 billion disadvantage for our world would be very different—poorer in spirit and The industry also has a strong global voice in IATA. Europe’s economic competitiveness. wealth—without it. Running an airline is challenging, especially when you do business across borders. Harmonization in the regulatory It has been an honor to serve as the Chairman of the IATA IATA plays an important role in the industry’s success. and operational environment assures a better passenger board of Governors over the past year. This review highlights Airlines compete vigorously to generate profits. but there experience and helps airlines to manage costs efficiently. the considerable progress made in 2013 on the industry’s are many areas where cooperation and global standards Governments and regulators need constant reminding main challenges. deliver value for all industry players and consumers. of this.They also need reminding of the unintended consequences of their actions—or inactions. We can be proud of aviation’s many achievements and The IATA operational safety Audit (IOSA), a condition of contributions during its first 100 years. but in marking this IATA membership, demonstrates the important contribution Taxes illustrate the former. Airlines and airline passengers important milestone, it is more important to look forward. of global standards. In 2013, the safety performance for are a soft target for taxes. Taxes may provide short-term IATA’s challenge is to continue supporting its members so IOSA-registered carriers was more than two times better budget relief for governments. but taxes dampen demand that they can profitably deliver efficient global connectivity than the rate for non-IOSA carriers. And the superiority for connectivity in the long run, and eventually that places that is safe, secure, and sustainable. of that performance will only rise as Enhanced IOSA is a greater burden on the economy. progressively adopted. richard anderson Chairman IATA Board of governors 2013- 2014 Chair of the Board: Mr. david Bronczek Mr. alexandre de Juniac Mr. Naresh Goyal Mr. harry hohmeister Mr. titus Naikuni Mr. Carsten spohr President and Chief President and Chief Chairman Chief Executive officer Group managing Director Chairman and Chief Mr. richard anderson Executive officer Executive officer JET AIRWAYs (INDIA) LTD. sWISS and Chief Executive officer Executive officer Chief Executive officer FEDEX EXPRESS AIR FRANCE-KLm KENYA AIRWAYs LUFTHANsA DELTA AIR LINEs (representing AIR Mr. rickard Gustafson Mr. alan Joyce Mr. Yang ho Cho FRANCE) President and Chief Chief Executive officer Mr. Masaru onishi Mr. antonio Vázquez MeMBers: Chairman and Chief Executive officer QANTAs Chairman Chairman IAG Executive officer Mr. Germán efromovich sAs JAPAN AIRLINEs board of Directors Mr. akbar al Baker KoREAN AIR President of the Mr. temel Kotil (representing IbERIA) Chief Executive officer board of Directors Mr. Peter hartman President and Chief Mr. Calin rovinescu QATAR AIRWAYs Mr. Chu Kwok Leung, ivan AVIANCA Vice Chairman Executive officer President and Chief Mr. Willie Walsh Chief Executive of the board TURKIsH AIRLINEs Executive officer Chief Executive Mr. Khalid abdullah CATHAY PACIFIC Mr. tewolde GebreMariam AIR FRANCE-KLm AIR CANADA officer International almolhem Chief Executive officer (representing KLm) Mr. Liu shaoyong Airlines Group Director General Mr. andrés Conesa ETHIoPIAN AIRLINEs Chairman Mr. Vitaly G. saveliev (representing sAUDI ARAbIAN AIRLINEs Chief Executive officer Mr. James hogan CHINA EAsTERN Chairman bRITIsH AIRWAYs) AERomEXICo Mr. Goh Choon Phong President and Chief AIRLINEs AERoFLoT Mr. david Barger Chief Executive officer Executive officer President and Chief Mr. enrique Cueto sINGAPoRE AIRLINEs ETIHAD AIRWAYs Mr. Pham Ngoc Minh Mr. si Xian Min Executive officer Chief Executive officer President and Chief President/Chairman
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Contents [Edit] Africa
    Low cost carriers The following is a list of low cost carriers organized by home country. A low-cost carrier or low-cost airline (also known as a no-frills, discount or budget carrier or airline) is an airline that offers generally low fares in exchange for eliminating many traditional passenger services. See the low cost carrier article for more information. Regional airlines, which may compete with low-cost airlines on some routes are listed at the article 'List of regional airlines.' Contents [hide] y 1 Africa y 2 Americas y 3 Asia y 4 Europe y 5 Middle East y 6 Oceania y 7 Defunct low-cost carriers y 8 See also y 9 References [edit] Africa Egypt South Africa y Air Arabia Egypt y Kulula.com y 1Time Kenya y Mango y Velvet Sky y Fly540 Tunisia Nigeria y Karthago Airlines y Aero Contractors Morocco y Jet4you y Air Arabia Maroc [edit] Americas Mexico y Aviacsa y Interjet y VivaAerobus y Volaris Barbados Peru y REDjet (planned) y Peruvian Airlines Brazil United States y Azul Brazilian Airlines y AirTran Airways Domestic y Gol Airlines Routes, Caribbean Routes and y WebJet Linhas Aéreas Mexico Routes (in process of being acquired by Southwest) Canada y Allegiant Air Domestic Routes and International Charter y CanJet (chartered flights y Frontier Airlines Domestic, only) Mexico, and Central America y WestJet Domestic, United Routes [1] States and Caribbean y JetBlue Airways Domestic, Routes Caribbean, and South America Routes Colombia y Southwest Airlines Domestic Routes y Aires y Spirit Airlines Domestic, y EasyFly Caribbean, Central and
    [Show full text]
  • IATA CLEARING HOUSE PAGE 1 of 21 2021-09-08 14:22 EST Member List Report
    IATA CLEARING HOUSE PAGE 1 OF 21 2021-09-08 14:22 EST Member List Report AGREEMENT : Standard PERIOD: P01 September 2021 MEMBER CODE MEMBER NAME ZONE STATUS CATEGORY XB-B72 "INTERAVIA" LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY B Live Associate Member FV-195 "ROSSIYA AIRLINES" JSC D Live IATA Airline 2I-681 21 AIR LLC C Live ACH XD-A39 617436 BC LTD DBA FREIGHTLINK EXPRESS C Live ACH 4O-837 ABC AEROLINEAS S.A. DE C.V. B Suspended Non-IATA Airline M3-549 ABSA - AEROLINHAS BRASILEIRAS S.A. C Live ACH XB-B11 ACCELYA AMERICA B Live Associate Member XB-B81 ACCELYA FRANCE S.A.S D Live Associate Member XB-B05 ACCELYA MIDDLE EAST FZE B Live Associate Member XB-B40 ACCELYA SOLUTIONS AMERICAS INC B Live Associate Member XB-B52 ACCELYA SOLUTIONS INDIA LTD. D Live Associate Member XB-B28 ACCELYA SOLUTIONS UK LIMITED A Live Associate Member XB-B70 ACCELYA UK LIMITED A Live Associate Member XB-B86 ACCELYA WORLD, S.L.U D Live Associate Member 9B-450 ACCESRAIL AND PARTNER RAILWAYS D Live Associate Member XB-280 ACCOUNTING CENTRE OF CHINA AVIATION B Live Associate Member XB-M30 ACNA D Live Associate Member XB-B31 ADB SAFEGATE AIRPORT SYSTEMS UK LTD. A Live Associate Member JP-165 ADRIA AIRWAYS D.O.O. D Suspended Non-IATA Airline A3-390 AEGEAN AIRLINES S.A. D Live IATA Airline KH-687 AEKO KULA LLC C Live ACH EI-053 AER LINGUS LIMITED B Live IATA Airline XB-B74 AERCAP HOLDINGS NV B Live Associate Member 7T-144 AERO EXPRESS DEL ECUADOR - TRANS AM B Live Non-IATA Airline XB-B13 AERO INDUSTRIAL SALES COMPANY B Live Associate Member P5-845 AERO REPUBLICA S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2017 Contents & Financial Highlights
    ANNUAL REPORT 2017 CONTENTS & FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS TUI GroupFinancial 2017 in numbers highlights Formats The Annual Report and 2017 2016 Var. % Var. % at the Magazine are also available online € 18.5 bn € 1,102.1restated m constant € million currency Turnover 18,535.0 17,153.9 + 8.1 + 11.7 Underlying EBITA1 1 1 + 11.7Hotels & %Resorts + 12.0356.5 % 303.8 + 17.3 + 19.2 Cruises 255.6 190.9 + 33.9 + 38.0 Online turnoverSource Markets underlying526.5 554.3 – 5.0 – 4.0 Northern Region 345.8 383.1 – 9.7 – 8.4 year-on-year Central Region 71.5 85.1 – 16.0 – 15.8 Western Region EBITA109.2 86.1 + 26.8 + 27.0 Other Tourism year-on-year13.4 7.9 + 69.6 + 124.6 Tourism 1,152.0 1,056.9 + 9.0 + 11.2 All other segments – 49.9 – 56.4 + 11.5 + 3.4 Mobile TUI Group 1,102.1 1,000.5 + 10.2 + 12.0 Discontinued operations – 1.2 92.9 n. a. Total 1,100.9 1,093.4 + 0.7 http://annualreport2017. tuigroup.com EBITA 2, 4 1,026.5 898.1 + 14.3 Underlying EBITDA4 1,541.7 1,379.6 + 11.7 56 %EBITDA2 4 23.61,490.9 % ROIC1,305.1 + 14.2 Net profi t for the period 910.9 464.9 + 95.9 fromEarnings hotels per share4 & € 6.751.36 % WACC0.61 + 123.0 Equity ratio (30 Sept.)3 % 24.9 22.5 + 2.4 cruisesNet capex and contentinvestments (30 Sept.) 1,071.9 634.8 + 68.9 comparedNet with cash 30 %(302 at Sept.) time 4of merger 583.0 31.8 n.
    [Show full text]
  • CTA Carriers US DOT Carriers
    CTA Carriers The Canadian Transportation Agency (CTA) has defined the application and disclosure of interline baggage rules for travel to or from Canada for tickets issued on or after 1 April 2015. The CTA website offers a list of carriers filing tariffs with the CTA at https://www.otc-cta.gc.ca/eng/carriers-who-file-tariffs-agency. US DOT Carriers The following is a list of carriers that currently file general rule tariffs applicable for travel to/from the United States. This list should be used by subscribers of ATPCO’s Baggage product for determining baggage selection rules for travel to/from the United States. For international journeys to/from the United States, the first marketing carrier’s rules apply. The marketing carrier selected must file general rules tariffs to/from the United States. Systems and data providers should maintain a list based on the carriers listed below to determine whether the first marketing carrier on the journey files tariffs (US DOT carrier). Effective Date: 14AUG17 Code Carrier Code Carrier 2K Aerolineas Galapagos (AeroGal) AA American Airlines 3P Tiara Air Aruba AB Air Berlin 3U Sichuan Airlines AC Air Canada 4C LAN Colombia AD Azul Linhas Aereas Brasileiras 4M LAN Argentina AF Air France 4O ABC Aerolineas S.A. de C.V. AG Aruba Airlines 4V BVI Airways AI Air India 5J Cebu Pacific Air AM Aeromexico 7I Insel Air AR Aerolineas Argentinas 7N Pan American World Airways Dominicana AS Alaska Airlines 7Q Elite Airways LLC AT Royal Air Maroc 8I Inselair Aruba AV Avianca 9V Avoir Airlines AY Finnair 9W Jet Airways AZ Alitalia A3 Aegean Airlines B0 Dreamjet SAS d/b/a La Compagnie Page 1 Revised 31 July 2017 Code Carrier Code Carrier B6 JetBlue Airways GL Air Greenland BA British Airways HA Hawaiian Airlines BE Flybe Group HM Air Seychelles Ltd BG Biman Bangladesh Airlines HU Hainan Airlines BR Eva Airways HX Hong Kong Airlines Limited BT Air Baltic HY Uzbekistan Airways BW Caribbean Airlines IB Iberia CA Air China IG Meridiana CI China Airlines J2 Azerbaijan Airways CM Copa Airlines JD Beijing Capital Airlines Co., Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • Runway Safety Spring 2021 Report
    Graphical NOTAM Interface For Improving Efficiency of Reporting NOTAM Information April 2021 Design Challenge: Runway Safety/Runway Incursions/Runway Excursions Challenge E: Optimizing application of NextGen technology to improve runway safety in particular and airport safety in general. Team Members: Undergraduate Students: Matthew Bacon, Gregory Porcaro, Andrew Vega Advisor’s Name: Dr. Audra Morse Michigan Technological University Table of Contents | 1 02 Executive Summary Runway excursions are a type of aviation incident where an aircraft makes an unsafe exit from the runway. According to the Ascend World Aircraft Accident Summary (WAAS), 141 runway excursion accidents involving the Western-built commercial aircraft fleet occurred globally from 1998 to 2007, resulting in 550 fatalities; 74% of landing phase excursions were caused by either weather-related factors or decision-making factors (Ascend, 2007). One mitigation strategy is training pilots how to interpret Runway Condition Codes (RWYCCs) to understand runway conditions. Recent developments such as NextGen and Electronic Flight Bags (EFBs) have improved the quality of weather condition reporting. However, Notices to Airmen (NOTAMs), the primary source of runway condition information and any other irregularities in airspace, are still presented to pilots in an inefficient format contributing to runway excursions and safety concerns NOTAMs consist of confusing abbreviations and do not effectively convey the relative importance of information. The team developed an Electronic Flight Bag (EFB) user interface that provides a graphical representation of NOTAM and weather information to improve how pilots receive condition changes at airports. The graphical NOTAM interface utilizes Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B) to receive real time NOTAM updates.
    [Show full text]
  • Market Report
    BCD Travel Research and Intelligence What you need to know: Airline operations: Middle East April 28, 2020 As demand declines and governments around the world restrict travel, airlines are adjusting their operations, and, in some cases, suspending all services. This report summarizes what airlines in the Middle East are doing and planning. Major carriers Airline Action and plans Emirates Most passenger operations suspended from March 25. Flights continue to London and Frankfurt, with repatriation services offered to other destinations Etihad Airways All flights suspended from March 26 until May 1. Repatriation flights operated to 11 destinations. Reduced schedule to resume from May 1 until June 30 Qatar Airways Most flights continue, serving passengers transiting through Doha Turkish Airlines All international and some domestic routes suspended until May 1 Emirates resuming some flights after suspending most passenger operations Emirates suspended most passenger operations from March 25, with no date for their resumption.1 It had been trying to maintain these flights as long as possible, to help travelers return home. But increasing travel restrictions – including the March 19 suspension of all entry visas to the United Arab Emirates (U.A.E.) – forced it to curtail its operations substantially. Emirates will continue to operate a small number of passenger flights to a limited number of countries, as long as their borders stay open and demand remains. The airline will resume suspended services once countries reopen their borders and travel confidence returns. Emirates is already looking forward to a gradual resumption of passenger services as travel and operational restrictions are lifted. It received approval to resume services to Brussels, Frankfurt, London, Paris and Zurich from April 6.2 It currently offers four flights per week to Heathrow and three to Frankfurt.
    [Show full text]
  • Advanced Concept of the National Airspace System of 2015: Human Factors Considerations For
    Advanced Concept of the National Airspace System of 2015: Human Factors Considerations for Air Traffic Control Ben Willems, Human Factors Team – Atlantic City, ATO-P Anton Koros, Northrop Grumman Information Technology June 2007 DOT/FAA/TC-TN-07/21 This document is available to the public through the National Technical Information Service (NTIS), Springfield, VA 22161. A copy is retained for reference at the William J. Hughes Technical Center Library. U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration William J. Hughes Technical Center Atlantic City International Airport, NJ 08405 ote technical note NOTICE This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for the contents or use thereof. The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers' names appear herein solely because they are considered essential to the objective of this report. This document does not constitute Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) certification policy. Consult your local FAA aircraft certification office as to its use. This report is available at the FAA, William J. Hughes Technical Center’s full-text Technical Reports Web site: http://actlibrary.tc.faa.gov in Adobe® Acrobat® portable document format (PDF). Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. DOT/FAA/TC-TN-07/21 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Advanced Concept of the National Airspace System of 2015: Human Factors June 2007 Considerations for Air Traffic Control 6. Performing Organization Code AJP-6110 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Republic of Yemen Air Transport Sector Review Note
    Republic of Yemen Air Transport Sector Review Note May, 2009 Middle East and North Africa Region Energy and Transport Unit CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (Exchange rate effective on January, 2009) Currency Unit = Yemeni Rial (YER) 1 YER = 0.005 USD 1 USD = 200 YER Fiscal Year: January 1 – December 31 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ACAC Arab Civil Aviation Commission ADE Aden International Airport AOC Air Operator Certificate ATC Air Traffic Control ATIS Automated Terminal Information System BASA Bilateral Air Service Agreements CAMA Civil Aviation and Meteorological Authority of Yemen FIR Fligths Information Region GNSS Global Navigation Satellite Systems GoY Government of Yemen GPS Global Positioning System IATA International Air Transport Association ICAO International Civil Aviation Organization ILS Instrument Landing Approach MoT Ministry of Transport RIY Al-Mukalla Airport SAH Sana’a International Airport SARP Standards and Recommended Practices UAE United Arab Emirates USOAP Universal Safety Oversight Audit Programme VOR - DME VHF Omni-Directional Radio Range - Distance Measuring Equipment 2/65 January 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................... 4 I. THE AIR TRANSPORT SECTOR AT A GLANCE ....................................................................... 9 II. AIR TRANSPORT SERVICES AND COMPETITION POLICY..........................................10 A. DOMESTIC AIR TRANSPORT ...............................................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • COVID-19) on Civil Aviation: Economic Impact Analysis
    Effects of Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) on Civil Aviation: Economic Impact Analysis Montréal, Canada 11 March 2020 Contents • Introduction and Background • Scenario Analysis: Mainland China • Scenario Analysis: Hong Kong SAR of China and Macao SAR of China • Summary of Scenario Analysis and Additional Estimates: China • Scenario Analysis: Republic of Korea • Scenario Analysis: Italy • Scenario Analysis: Iran (Islamic Republic of) • Preliminary Analysis: Japan and Singapore 2 Estimated impact on 4 States with the highest number of confirmed cases* Estimated impact of COVID-19 outbreak on scheduled international passenger traffic during 1Q 2020 compared to originally-planned: • China (including Hong Kong/Macao SARs): 42 to 43% seat capacity reduction, 24.8 to 28.1 million passenger reduction, USD 6.0 to 6.9 billion loss of gross operating revenues of airlines • Republic of Korea: 27% seat capacity reduction, 6.1 to 6.6 million passenger reduction, USD 1.3 to 1.4 billion loss of gross operating revenues of airlines • Italy: 19% seat capacity reduction, 4.8 to 5.4 million passenger reduction, USD 0.6 to 0.7 billion loss of gross operating revenues of airlines • Iran (Islamic Republic of): 25% seat capacity reduction, 580,000 to 630,000 passenger reduction, USD 92 to 100 million loss of gross operating revenues of airlines * Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Situation Report by WHO 3 Global capacity share of 4 States dropped from 23% in January to 9% in March 2020 • Number of seats offer by airlines for scheduled international passenger traffic;
    [Show full text]
  • Air Defense Identification Zone (ADIZ) in the Light of Public International Law
    Air Defense Identification Zone (ADIZ) in the light of Public International Law Air Defense Identification Zone (ADIZ) in the light of Public International Law ZOLTÁN PAPP Phd Student, Pázmány Péter Catholic University, In-house legal counsel, HungaroControl Pte Ltd. Co.* The Air Defense Identification Zone (ADIZ) is established to serve the national security interests of the state. Maintaining ADIZ becomes fundamentally relevant from the perspective of international law when such a zone extends into airspace suprajacent to international waters. Materially, two considerations are most relevant in terms of ADIZ conforming to international law, both potentially creating a conflict with ADIZ rules: Contracting Parties to the Chicago Convention on International Civil Aviation have delegated rule-making powers to enact rules of the air with a view to safeguarding the safety of air traffic in international airspace to the ICAO Council. Furthermore, in international airspace the state of registry generally enjoys exclusive jurisdiction with respect to the aircraft carrying its national mark. In this paper ADIZ will be deemed as exercising jurisdiction over extraterritorial acts by the state maintaining ADIZ; hence, the prescriptive and enforcement distinction adds an additional layer to the analysis of the international legal context of ADIZ. The response to as to how ADIZ fits in the international legal framework may differ depending on whether one seeks to identify permissive rules of international law related to the maintenance of ADIZ in international airspace or the non-existence of prohibitive rules sufficient to justify conformance with international law. Keywords: ADIZ, air law, law of the sea, Chicago Convention on International Civil Aviation, jurisdiction, use of force, international customary law, civil aircraft, state of registry 1.
    [Show full text]
  • New Expanded Joint Venture
    Press Release The Power of Choice for Cargo Customers as Air France-KLM, Delta and Virgin Atlantic launch trans-Atlantic Joint Venture AMSTERDAM/PARIS, ATLANTA and LONDON: February 3rd, 2020 – Air France-KLM Cargo, Delta Air Lines Cargo and Virgin Atlantic Cargo are promising cargo customers more connections, greater shipment routing flexibility, improved trucking options, aligned services and innovative digital solutions with the launch of their expanded trans-Atlantic Joint Venture (JV). The new partnership, which represents 23% of total trans-Atlantic cargo capacity or more than 600,000 tonnes annually, will enable the airlines to offer the best-ever customer experience, and a combined network of up to 341 peak daily trans-Atlantic services – a choice of 110 nonstop routes with onward connections to 238 cities in North America, 98 in Continental Europe and 16 in the U.K. More choice and convenience for customers Customers will be able to leverage an enhanced network built around the airlines’ hubs in Amsterdam, Atlanta, Boston, Detroit, London Heathrow, Los Angeles, Minneapolis, New York-JFK, Paris, Seattle and Salt Lake City. It creates convenient nonstop or one-stop connections to every corner of North America, Europe and the U.K., giving customers the added confidence of delivery schedules being met by a wide choice of options. The expanded JV enables greater co-operation between the airlines, focused on delivering world class customer service and reliability on both sides of the Atlantic achieved through co-located facilities, joint trucking options as well as seamless bookings and connected service recovery. The airlines already co-locate at warehouses in key U.S., U.K.
    [Show full text]
  • (Eu) 2015/ 1014
    27.6.2015 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 162/65 COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2015/1014 of 25 June 2015 amending Regulation (EC) No 474/2006 establishing the Community list of air carriers which are subject to an operating ban within the Community (Text with EEA relevance) THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 2111/2005 of the European Parliament and the Council of 14 December 2005 on the establishment of a Community list of air carriers subject to an operating ban within the Community and on informing air passengers of the identity of the operating carrier, and repealing Article 9 of Directive 2004/36/CE (1), and in particular Article 4(2) thereof, Whereas: (1) Commission Regulation (EC) No 474/2006 (2) established the list of air carriers which are subject to an operating ban within the Union, referred to in Chapter II of Regulation (EC) No 2111/2005. (2) In accordance with Article 4(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2111/2005, some Member States and the European Aviation Safety Agency (‘EASA’) communicated to the Commission information that is relevant in the context of updating that Union list. Relevant information was also communicated by certain third countries. On the basis of that information and the verifications carried out by the Commission, the Union list should now be updated. (3) The Commission informed all air carriers concerned, either directly or through the authorities responsible for their regulatory oversight, about the essential facts and considerations which would form the basis for a decision to impose on them an operating ban within the Union or to modify the conditions of an operating ban imposed on an air carrier which is included in the Union list.
    [Show full text]