<<

Current status of the Transboundary Aquifer Area- Policy Implications

P.K. Kenabatho, Ph.D.

Department of Environmental Science, University of , . NEPAD Southern African Network of Centres of Excellence in Water Climate Change ..

As per UN WATER : Adaptation to Climate Change is mainly about better water management. Without improved water resources management, progress towards poverty reduction targets, the MDGs and sustainable development in all its economics, social and environmental dimensions, will be jeopardized. Population Growth Throughout History (Source: United Nations) Population Growth and Water Availability in the SADC region

Water Stress in Many Countries

Source: SADC, IUCN, SARDC, World Bank, Sida. Defining and Mainstreaming Sustainability in Water Resources Management in Southern , 2002. p.38 Rainfall pattern, recharge in Southern Africa

Spatial variation of rainfall and recharge Complexities of Water Resources Management

Reliable supply and Regional good quality Groundwater development resources Reduce Full cost management conflicts recovery Enough Aquifer water at recharge low cost Equal & safe yield access for the poor Industry Policy Makers

Water Regional Utilities Water Managers Farmers Groundwater Experts Local NGO Sources of water (Botswana)

Indigenous Rivers run for 10-75 days in a year; Recharge Low

Inter-basin Transfers

Desalination

12 10

8 Extraction rate in 6 Mcm 4 Recharge rate in They drain Mcm annually 2 0 3 N. Palla Zambesi 2100 Mm

Pandamatenga Abstraction and Maun Recharge Shashe Orapa Dikgatlhong Ghansi Letsibogo Selebi Phikwe

Charles Hill Lotsane North-South Carrier Selika Palla Road Masama Bokaa Riversdale Jwaneng Mmamashia Sekoma Gaborone Legend Jwaneng Molatedi Kanye Ramotswa Demand Surface Source Groundwater Existing Transfer Tshabong Possible Transfer Eastern Botswana Model 2005 Groundwater issues in Ramotswa

 Evidence of pollution in some aquifers  The case of Ramotswa dolomite aquifers

 One of the boreholes showing high levels of nitrates – largely due to seepage from pit latrines and septic tanks

 Well field closed in 1996 due to Groundwater pollution Sources of contamination and Water resources mgt issues

ü Promotion of use of pit latrines in the 1980s to address sanitation led to grroundwater contamination (Zwikula, 2005) ü Hundreds of private septic tanks were also in use during that time in the industrial complex and railway station in Ramotswa. ü Due to this pollution, the wellfields were decommissioned in 1996 and the village was supplied with water from the . ü A study done in 2001 indicated that out of 31 boreholes sampled in 2001, 11 had nitrate levels exceeding the Botswana’s recommended quality standards of 45mg/L. Ø Seven of the boreholes sampled in 1983 were re- sampled in 2001 and three of these showed increases in nitrate ranging from approximately 4 times to 55 times (Staudt, 2003). Ø This study also found that about 3000 pit latrines constituted a major groundwater pollution hazard to the shallow water table (where in some cases it is as close as 3m below the ground). Ø Due to increased droughts in recent years, the Water Utilities Corporation (WUC) has rehabilitated the wellfield to augment water supply in the greater Gaborone area as of 2013. Location Map of Ramotswa and Wellfield About Ramotswa Village and Wellfield

Ø Ramotswa Village located in South Eastern Botswana, about 25 km south of Gaborone Ø Located closer to two villages, Taung and Boatle Ø Due to its proximity to Gaborone it has experienced significant population growth from 18683 to 23760 between 2001 and 2011 (Statistics Botswana, 2011) Ø Ramotswa wellfield located about 25km upstream of Gaborone dam Ø It covers and area of about 29 km2, part of which is within the village (DWA, 2000) Production boreholes in the area

Ø Ramotswa Wellfield comprises 10 production boreholes (4336; 4337; 4340; 4349; 4358; 4373; 4400; 4406; 4422; and 4423) and several monitoring boreholes. Ø Historically, residents of the area draw water from hand- dug wells in the alluvium of the . Ø The first recorded early borehole was drilled in 1937. Ø In the late 1970’s, it was decided that groundwater from the dolomites in Ramotswa should be considered for emergency water supply for Gaborone during drought periods. Ø Hence construction of more boreholes and their equipment in the mid 1980s Geology and Hydrogeology

 The geology in the area consists mainly of three lithological supergroup, i.e. The -Waterberg, The Transvaal, and the Lobatse-Ventersdorp supergroups (Key, 1980, 1983, Carney, et al 1994).  The Transvaal supergroup is of greatest hydrogeological importance.  Specifically the Ramotswa Dolomite and the Lephala Shales Formation, which are among the highly productive wellfields in Botswana (WUC, 1989).  The Lobatse-Ventersdorp supergroup consists of volcano-sedimentary sequences widely distributed in the eastern parts of Botswana, and believed to be 2700 Ma.  They are considered to be the oldest in the study area, and belong to the Kaapvaal Craton which forms the Archaean basement over a large area in Southern Africa.  This supergroup is predominantly overlain by the Black Reef formation of the Transvaal supergroup.  The Ramotswa wellfield extends over an area of 29 km2, which includes part of the Ramotswa Village (Staudt, 2003).  The two primary aquifers (Ramotswa Dolomite and the Lephala Shales Formation) are considered to be in local hydraulic connection via the N-S trending fracture zone (Staudt, 2003).  The dominant feature of the system is a marked anisotropy associated with high density fracturing  In the dolomites groundwater movement is considered to be through local karstification along structural lineaments  Leading to high transmissivities and storativities Stratigraphy of the Transvaal Supergroup in the Project area (Key, 1983)

Formation Lithology Woodlands Fine-grained silicious rocks Sengoma quartzite Upper massive and pure quartzite; bottom shales Sengoma argillite Upper dolomitic and banded carbonates; bottom shales Ditlhojana quartzite quartzite Ditlhojana volcanic Massive andesites and rhyolites Ditlhojana shale Shales Tsokwane quartzite Massive and flaggy quartzites Lephala Chert clasts, Bevet’s conglomerate Ramotswa shale Siltstones and shale Magopane Bedded chert and minor dolomite Matholobota Inter-layered dolomite and chert Ramotswa Dolomite with minor chert dolomite (stromatolithes) Black Reef quartzite Quartz and pebbles in quartz matrix

 The dolomites consists of two karst zones: a shallow and deep zone  The upper karstic zone has variable thickness of between 20 and 50 m and receives recharge from rivers and percolating rainwater.  The deeper karstic zone has a thickness of between 25 to 50 m and recharge is considered to be from  Besides major linear karsts associated with the dolomites, there are also unfractured dolomite country rock which is usually low yielding.  Lephala formation is similar to the Dolomites but is unaffected by karstification.  It is characterised by two fissured zones which are separated by less fissured zone.  The two zones have variable thickness of between 30 to 40m in favour of the upper zone  The lower Argillites have better yields at fractured zones which can be at 40-60 m depth  Yields of boreholes in the Lephala formation depend on their proximity to the river, intersection of the fissured zone and extent of secondary infills (WUC, 1989, Staudt, 2003). Rivers in the TBA Area

 The main rivers are Notwane, Metsemaswaane and Taung which are all ephemeral.  Notwane River is the main tributary into the Gaborone dam, and flows eastwards towards the .  Average rainfall is about 540mm per year Using IWRM best practices to develop Appropriate Capacity and Training to benefit Sub-Saharan Africa Water Security [ACT4SSAWS]  AN AFRICAN UNION COMMISSTION RESEARCH GRANT  Lead by CSIR in South Africa  Involves 7 partners in Southern Africa  Undertaking various projects  Botswana (UB) dealing with Assessment of Groundwater Contamination in the Ramotswa Aquifer and reduced inflows into the Gaborone dam Snapshots of boreholes in the Aquifer area

A Pit latrine located upstream of Inspection of a borehole during and near a borehole in the village a field trip Borehole details

BH No. Drilled Screen Water Strike WRL Yield Formation Depth Depth (mbgl) (mbgl) (m3/hr.) (mbgl) (mbgl) 4336 102 Open hole 24-32, 45 14.32 90 Dolomite 4337 118 Open hole 36, 81-82 5.51 90 Shale & dolomite 4340 120 Open hole 13- 7.12 24 Conglomerate 14,30&42 4349 120 12-85 11,37&112 4 90 Dolomite (254mm) 4358 102 Open hole 45 8.05 40 Dolomite 4373 120 (28- 40,56,75&96 7.09 90 Conglomerate 40),(70- 89), (92- 110) 4422 120 Open hole 70-72 4 80 Dolomite 4423 120 Open hole 24-44 6 80 Dolomite Z4400 102 Open hole 47 - 150 Dolomite

Water supply from the Aquifer

 Water is pumped from the 9 production boreholes  Not all the boreholes are contaminated, so water from contaminated boreholes are pumped into reservoirs and blended with those from good quality  Then treated at nearby treatment plant before it is piped to demand centres (inside and) outside the aquifer area  The proposed abstractions from production boreholes is 10,000 m3/day Socio-economic issues-The Case of AU/EU Project(UB)-Contributions from R Chanda and B Mosetlhi

ü To investigate the causes of the pollution of the Ramotswa wellfield

1) Factual data and perceptions about the level of pollution

2) Factual data and perceptions about causes of pollution

ü To gauge peoples’ perceptions about use of the polluted water for various purposes. ü To investigate the effects of ground water pollution on people’s health and livelihoods before and after the policy response

1) Peoples’ perceptions about the policy response to groundwater pollution (e.g. relevance of the policy response)

2) The effects of ground water pollution on people’s health and livelihoods (e.g. impact on water availability/access/security, costs, uses, distribution, local economy, etc.) before the policy response

3) The effects of ground water pollution on people’s health and livelihoods after the policy response ü To gauge peoples’ perceptions about possible solutions to groundwater pollution Key stakeholders in the area-Stakeholder Mapping

1. Local Communities – A wide range of water users, some water resource/facility owners, those responsible for water pollution, and water facility management committees 2. Traditional Authorities 3. Central and Local Government Water Authorities – i.e. water suppliers, planners, regulators and decision makers 4. Civil Society & the Media 5. Researchers (e.g. Study Technical Team) 6. Politicians (e.g. Study Area Parliamentarians & Counselors) Some Environmental issues

Ø Diverse ecosystems in the area Ø Industrial activities (i.e. Bolux Milling Company) Ø Commercial agriculture (horticulture, poultry, stock and piggery) Ø urban and rural lifestyles, tourism, quarries and dams. Ø Private freehold farms which are a home to middle and high income population most of which work in Gaborone city Ø Pit latrines located near some production boreholes (less than 10 m) Evidence of Rainfall Recharge (Matsaunyane et al 2015)

0 350

1 300 2

3 250 Monthly rainfall 4 200 BH4972 BH4164 5 BH4348 150 6

7 100

8 50 9

10 0 ü Water Levels rising due to rainfall events 0 350

5 300

Monthly rainfall 10 250 BHZ6424 BH6423 15 200 BH4973 BH4995 20 150 BH4886

25 100 GROUNDWATER LEVEL(M)

30 50

35 0

Deep aquifer response Percentage of Urban Population in Botswana

Population: 2.0 mill.

Mostly concentrated in the eastern part. In 1981: 18 % In 1991: 46 % In 2001: 51 % In 2010: 61 % By 2020/25: 70 % (est.) Unsustainable land use practices contribute to land degradation and desertification. Africa’s “Shrinking” Land Base 1950 World’s Reducing Grain Harvest

1970

1990

2005 2050

Source: U.N. FAO, compiled by World watch Institute, 2000 Natural Disasters in Botswana

Floods in Taung-Ramotswa

Typically in the last 2 decades – the average loss have been to the tune of 0.11% of the GDP. Av. Natural Disaster Occurrence Reported (1980-2010) Intervention Analyses (CUSUM test) undertaken at the synoptic stations

400 200 Pandamatenga 0 -2001960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010

Maun -400 -600 CUSUM Values Francistown -800 Gantsi -1000 Selibe-Phikwe Year

Mahalapye

1000

Goodhope 500 Legend 0

rainfall stations 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 -500 ± CUSUM Values 0 55 110 220 Kilometers -1000 general change from 1982 detected Year

600 1000 400 500 200 0 0

Year -2001960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 1965 1975 1985 1995 2005 -400 -500 CUSUM Values -600 -1000 -800 Year CUSUM Values Study on Notwane catchment at Gaborone dam (Parida, Moalafhi & Kenabatho, 2006)

.

Using a Neural Network Model: Climate & Land use contributed 48% : 52% ROC 25°0'0"E 26°0'0"E 27°0'0"E 28°0'0"E 29°0'0"E 30°0'0"E

19°0'0"S 19°0'0"S Existing±and New Reservoirs Together drain about 20°0'0"S 20°0'0"S 2100 M m3/a Ntimbale: 26.4 M m3 Ntimbale

21°0'0"S 21°0'0"S 3 Shashe Shashe: 85.3 M m Dikgatlhong 3 Letsibogo Lower Shashe: 400 M m 3 22°0'0"S Thune 22°0'0"S Letsibogo: 100 M m Lotsane Thune: 90 M m3

23°0'0"S 23°0'0"S Lotsane: 42.35 M m3

24°0'0"S 24°0'0"S Bokaa : 18.5 M m3

Bokaa Legend

Existing and current dams Gaborone 3 River Systems Gaborone: 141.4 M m 25°0'0"S Nywane National boundary 25°0'0"S Nywane : 2.2 M m3

3 26°0'0"S 26°0'0"S Presently: 350 M m 3 0 45 90 180 Kilometers Additional:550 M m

27°0'0"S 27°0'0"S

25°0'0"E 26°0'0"E 27°0'0"E 28°0'0"E 29°0'0"E 30°0'0"E City of Gaborone and its sprawl Water consumption increase by about 4 MCM/yr

y = 3.3714x + 126.57 200

R 2 = 0.8337 180

160

140

120

100

80

60

40

20

0

1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003

Year The North South Carrier Lower Shashe Dam

Let si bog o PS

Mora la ne PS

Pala pye Palapy e Mor upul e wtw

Pala pye PS

Kalamare Ma hal ap e Mahalapye Shosh ong wtw

Serorome V all ey PS

Bok aa D am Legend Phas e I

Phas e II Mmamashia wtw

Great er Ga borone Modeling Inflow into the Gaborone Reservoir

\&

\& \& \& \& \& \& \&

\& \&

\&

\&

\&

Water Demand and Water Supply

 Population Density : Average 2.6 /km2 Urban : 440 /km2

 Water demand very high in urban places compared to rural areas  e.g. Water demand in Gaborone is of the order of 240 lits/person/day ; compared to 75-100 lits/person/day in rural areas

 The current reservoir capacities created equivalent to 530 lits/cap/day DWA Water Losses (2002-2010)-Botswana

30.0% 50%

45% 25.0% 40%

35% 20.0% 30%

25%

15.0% 20%

15%

10% 10.0% 5%

0% 5.0%

0.0% 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 High losses (Kanye and High water losses-avrg Ramotswa) 26% Water Demand Management

•Use of recycled water (16 % of the water resources) : still unacceptable to many, especially the poor (Chanda & Ruthenberg, 2005)

• Rainwater harvesting

•Urban water restrictions have been successful during the drought spells of 1980’s, for example reducing consumptions by 45 %, and 35 % for 2005.

•Loss Reductions and efficiency in water use: Through use of pressure reduction valves in the main pipe line (to be operated at night time) and replacement of leaky taps with sensor type taps in public buildings etc. can save nearly 40 % of wastages) In summary

Ø Both surface and groundwater – Key to Botswana’s development. Ø As well as Improved Water Supply/management –due to rapid rate of urbanization and sanitation related issues. Ø Climate Change will remain – can affect our major sources of water significantly. Ø We know that our catchments not storage types. Ø Even with creation of water storages – we are unable to adequately meet requirements – possibly due to (i) evaporative losses from reservoirs ; (ii)morphological changes taking place in the catchments – in the upstream of reservoirs (iii)changes in recession pattern in streams (iv)inadequate steps in water demand management For long term benefits

 Conjunctive use of groundwater and surface water as well as monitoring of the same is the way forward  Policy on Watershed &/ Aquifer management (including TBA), together with water demand management is critical towards improved Water Resources Management in Botswana, and the region.  Policies addressing land use in catchments/aquifer areas should be put in place to maintain/improve yields and reduce possibility of water contamination.  A more participatory approach is needed in assessment and management of TBAs such as the Ramotswa Aquifer Acknowledgement

Special thanks to Prof. Parida, Prof Chanda, Dr Mosetlhi, and Mr. Thato Setloboko (DWA) for their contribution

Meteorological Services, Dept. of Water Affairs & Dept. of Agriculture of the Govt. of Botswana for providing the raw data

Thank You for your attention