DOCSLIB.ORG

Massachusetts

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Massachusetts NUMBER OF INHABITANTS ·Massachusetts LIST OF TABLES [Page numbers listed here omit the State prefix: number which appears as part of the page number for each page. The prefix: for this State is 21] Tnb,c !'ago 1.-Population of Massachusetts, urban and rural: 1790 to 1950------------------------------- 5 2.-Population in groups of places according to size: 1950------------------------------------- 5 3.-Population in groups of places according to size: 1900 to 1950______________________________ 6 4.-Population of urban places of 10,000 or more from earliest census to 1950-------------------- 7 5.-Arca and population of counties, urban and rural: 1930 to 1950---------------------------- 9 6.-Population of counties by minor civil divisions: 1930 to 1950------------------------------- 10 7.-Population of all cities and of unincorporated places of 1,000 or more: 1950 and 1940 ------------- 12 8.-Population of cities of 5,000 or more, by wards: 1950------------------------------------- 13 9.-Population of urbanized areas: Hl50 _____ --_____ --_---- -- ---- ------- --- ---- ----- -------- 14 21-1 072218-52-2 MASSACHUSETTS-SECTION 1, WESTERN PART .......Nl MINOR CIVIL DIVISIONS-CITIES AND TOWNS ~ 2 3 4 5 Cl.All.K••URO FRANKLIN. l~=~~ . ~•ca. c6 8 B (f.l~ 6::r: c c ~ .......... l...·-·1 •IUMPIJL• ~ ! M'""" D ....... , D SCALE 2.11 2 .4 ta 10 tz. 1.C ti ta 20MILES e---'9 e-----9 I Cl~" INDJCA'l'J: l~RPORA.Tll> PLACES HA.VlNG LESfl: THAM 25it INHA.Dii'.t.NTS lJHINCoRPORATED pUCE NAMES.All~OWM IK IT.WC$ 2 3 4 5 Large-sea.le copies of this map may be purchased from Supei:intcndent of Documents, U- S. Govo:.rnment Printing Offico, Washington 25, D- C. MASSACHUSETTS-SECTION 2, NORTH CENTRAL PART MINOR CIVIL DIVISIONS-CITIES AND TOWNS 5 6 7 8 9 10 A A • WORCESTER co. w........ \ MIDDLESEX CO. ~ ·.:'"\ ~ "0YAl.STOM '\.... .} ·1 WIMCHS:Hl>O"' ... SH8UJUtH•N j (J:l}. z B f ~ ,· ·/ B / ~ ( \ ~ i / ( { j ~to c c 3 ~ ~I,;;:'.!. c!:J D SCALE D 2. f 0 2° .& IS S 10 12. 1-4 115 18 ~ MILES H A ......----.. E+3 E+3 e--a I CJFlCLES INDICATE UNINCORPORATED PlAC£S HAVING LESS n.tAN 2!iOO INHAB:ITANTS UNINCORPORATED PLACE NAMES ME SHOWN IN ITALICS ~ 6 7 8 9 10 ....... 5 caI MASSACHUSETTS-SECTION 3, SOUTHEASTERN· PART ......NJ MINOR CIVIL DIVISIONS-CITIES AND TOWNS I ~ 8 9 10 ·- 11 12 l~~~!:.':<71.~.l. A)_\~ 1'wtli:Sritllol1-StitllattCtllltr ,, - • ~ "S1orrAmi-.5a!liHm. !•Hltf.r:IHAM . ~~,:.:_er; ' Tr~ ! ~<z2> ·~ 0 ~ "\:;/;;•~·~-, 0 ~ E E I F F ~ SCALE %TO 2 4 6 8 10 11 1.4 16 18 2DMIL£S h H ee+i E+3 e+5 = CIRCU:S INDICATE UNINCORPORATED PL.ACES HAVING LESS THAN 2500 '.UNINCORPORAT£D PLACE NAMES ARE SHOWN JN ITALICS ~--~------ 1· NANTUCKET CO. G i ./ G Q" 8 9 10 11 12 NUMBER OF INHABITANTS 21-5 Table 1.-POPULATION. OF MASSACHUSETTS, URBAN AND RURAL: 1790 TO 1950 [For description of new and old urban definitions, see text. Minus sign {-) denotes decrease] The State Urban territory Rural territory Percent of total Oensus date Increase over pre· Increase over pre· Increase over pre- coding census Number ceding census ceding census Population o! urban Population Population Urban Rural places 1 Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent ~ ______ ., _____ _,. __________ New urban definition, 1950 {Apr. 1). 4, 600, 514 373, 793 8. 7 84 2 3, 959, 239 ------------ 731, 275 ------------ 84.4 15.6 Old urban definition: rn50 !Apr. ll-------------------- 4, 690, 514 373, 793 8. 7 122 4, 122, 138 202, 662 6.8 568, 376 111, 131 24.3 87.9 12.1 1940 A.pr. 1~-------------------- 4, 316, 721 67, 107 1. 6 122 3, 859, 476 28, 050 0. 7 457, 245 39, 057 9.3 89.4 10.6 1930 (A.pr. I -------------------- 4, 249, 614 397, 258 10. 3 122 3, 831, 426 302, 510 10.5 418, 188 34, 748 9.1 90.2 9.8 rn20 (Jan. 1l---·---------------- 3, 852, 356 485, 940 14.4 116 3, 468, 910 473, 177 15. 8 383, 440 12, 763 3.4 llO.O 10. 0 !G!O (Apr. 15l------------------- 3, 360, 416 561, 070 20.0 115 2, 995, 739 583, 862 24. 2 370, 677 -22, 792 -5.8 89.0 11. 0 moo !June 1). __________________ 2, 805, 346 566, 399 25.3 105 2, 411, 877 576, 989 31.4 393,469 -10. 590 -2. 6 86.CL 14.0 1890 Jlme ll------------------- 2, 238, 947 455, 862 25. 6 97 1, 834, 888 503, 308 37. 8 404,059 -47, 446 -10. 5 82.0 18. 0 1880 (June ll- ·----------------- 1, 783, 085 325, 734 22.4 80 1, 331, 580 359, 499 37.0 451, 505 -33, 765 -7.0 74.7 25.3 18001870 (June!)(June 1 ·------------------___________________ 1, 457, 351 220, 285 18. 4 65 972, 081 238, 872 32, 0 485, 270 -12, 587 -2.5 66.7 33.3 1, 231, 006 236, 552 23.8 57 733, 209 229, 348 45. 5 497, 857 7, 204 1. 5 59.6 40.4 1850 (June!) ___________________ 994, 514 256, 815 34.8 43 li03, 861 224, 407 80.3 490, 653 32, 408 7.1 49.3 1840 vnne l) ___________________ 50. 7 1830 June 1) • ._ ________________ 737, 099 127, 291 20. 9 24 279, 454 89, 797 47.3 458, 245 37, 494 8.9 37.ll 62, 1 610, 408 87, 121 16. 0 22 189, 657 70, 470 59.1 420, 751 10, 651 4.1 31. 1 68.0 1820 (Aug, 1\------------------- 523, 287 51, 247 10. 9 14 119, 187 18, 570 18. 5 404, 100 32, 677 8.8 22.8 77.2 1810 tAug, 6 ---·--------------- 3 472, 040 49, 105 11.6 12 100, 617 3/i,317 54, l 371, 423 13, 878 3. 9 21.3 78. 7 1800 Aug. 4l------------------- '422, 845 44, 058 11. 0 8 05, 300 14, 098 27. 5 357, 545 ............29, ______ 960 9.1 15.4 84. 6 1700 (Aug. 2l------------------- 8 378, 787 ------------ ---------- 7 51, 202 ------------ ---·-------- 327, 585 ------------ 13. 5 86.5 1 According to the new urban definition, tho urban population comprises persons residing in urban territory but not necessarily In an urban place, which ls defined as an lncor· po rated Place of 2,500 or more, or an unincorporated place of 2,500 or more located outside an urbanized area. Under the old definition, Incorporated places of 2, 5-00 or more and plaoos urhan under special rule are classified as urban places. · 'Incluclcs 604,559 persons in urban territory outside of urban places. 1 Excludes population of Maine, admitted to the Union as a separate State in March 1820. The population of Maine was 228,705in1810, 161,719 In 1800, 96,540 In 1790. Table 2.-POPULATION IN GROUPS OF PLACES ACCORDING TO SIZE: 1950 Percent Percent Type of area and size of place Number p 1 ti of total Percent Type of area and size of place Number Population of total Percent of places opu a on popula- of total of places 11Po1;1a- of total ----------------1-------------1----11----------------1----1---·-tion ------ The State__________________________ ---------- 4, 690, 514 100. O Urban, total-Con, Ontside urbanized areas ________ ------·---- 55 563, 540 12. 0 14. 2 Urban, total. __________ --------------- t') 3, 959, 239 84. 4 100, 0 Places of 50,000 or more___________________ 1 53, 348 1.1 1. 3 Places of 25,000 to 50,000._________________ 4 155, 247 a.a 3. 9 Within urbanized areas_____________ -------- ---------- 3, 395, 699 72. 4 85. 8 Places of 10,000 to 25,000__________________ 12 187, 929 4. 0 4. 7 Central cities, total.. __ ------------------- 9 1, 683, 787 35. 9 42. 5 Places of 5,000 to 10,000 ••• -·-·------------ 11 72, 578 1. 5 1.8 Cities of 500,000 to 1,000.000.____________ 1 801, 444 17.1 20. 2 Places of 2,500 to 5,000-------------------- 27 94, 438 2.0 2. 4 Cities of 200,000 to 500,000 _______________ ---------- -----------· --·------- ---------- C!t!es of 100,000 to 250,000_______________ 4 587, 037 12. 5 14. 8 Rural, totaL---··--·---------·-----·-- ---------- 731,275 15. 8 100.0 Cities of 50,000 to 100,000---------------- 4 295,306 6. 3 7. 5 Cities under 50,000 ______________________ ---------- ----------·- ---------- ---------- Places under 2,500-------------------------- 69 104, 758 2. 2 14. 3 Places of 2,000 to 2,500____________________ 7 16, 1!37 O. 3 2. 2 Urban fringes, totaL--------------------· ---·------ 1, 711,912 86. 5 43.2 Places of 1,500 to 2,000____________________ 23 39, 682 0. 8 5. 4 Incorporated places of 2,500 or more____ 20 1, 047, 353 22. 3 20. 5 Places of 1,000 to 1,500.------------------- 39 49, 139 1. 0 6. 7 Incorporated places of 100,000 to Places under 1,000 ________________________ ---------- ------------ ---------- ---------- 250,0QQ __ --------------------------- 2 223, 091 4. 8 5. 6 Other rural territory·---------------------- ---------- 626, 517 13. 4 85. 7 Incorporated places of50,000 to 100,000. 5 391, 484 8. 3 9. 9 Incorporated places of 25,000 to 50,000. 9 344, 870 7. 4 8. 7 Urbanized areas, totaL---··---------- 9 3, 395, 699 72.4 100. 0 Incorporated places of 10,000 to 25,000. 4 87, 008 1. 9 2, 2 ------------- Incorporated places of 5,000 to 10,000 .• ---···---- ------------ ---------- ---------- Areas of 1,000.000 or more __________________ _ 1 2, 233,448 47.6 65,8 Areas of 500,000 to 1,000,000 ________________ _ 1 32, 539 o. 7 1. 0 Incorporated places of 2,500 to 5,ooo ___ ---------- ------------ ---------- ---------- Areas of 250,000 to 500,000 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Annual Reports of the Town of Hanover, New Hampshire for The
    NHamp 352.07 H24 1978 w WOttk /: ; •• m ' / ./ , University of Tlew Hampshire ANNUAL REPORTS of the Town of HANOVER, NEW HAMPSHIRE For The Year Ending December 31, 1978 COVER PHOTO Ladder Tower Main Street, Hanover. By: Adrian Bouchard O N n TABLE OF CONTENTS Town Officers 3 Warrant 7 Finance Committee Report 14 Report of Selectmen 16 Town Activities 18 Auditors' Reports and Financial Statements 37 (See separate index on Page 37) Supplementary Financial Information Budget Discussions and Comparisons - 1978-1979 62 Budget Summary and Analysis Report - 1978-1979 69 Capital Outlay and Capital Reserve Expenditures - 1979 91 Federal Revenue Sharing Allocation 93 1978 Tax Rates and Assessments 94 Tax Collector's Reports 96 Town Clerk's Report 98 Treasurer's Report 98 Parking Fund 99 Hanover Housing Authority Reports 100 Hanover District Court 101 Upper Valley Regional Emergency Medical Care Service 102 Regional Association Reports Headrest 104 Uppper Valley-Lake Sunapee Council 105 Upper Valley Regional Dispatch Center 106 Town Meetings - 1978 108 Annual Report of the Hanover School District 118 (see separate index on page 119) Annual Report of the Dresden School District Dl (see separate index on page D2) TOWN OF HANOVER TOWN OFFICERS SUPERVISORS OF BOARD OF SELECTMEN THE CHECKLIST James Campion, III, Chairman Sharon Tucker Martha S. Solow Dorothy C. King Stephen V. F. Waite Eleanor B. Rand Roy W. Banwell, Jr. Benjamin Thompson, Jr. MODERATOR LIBRARY TRUSTEES Harry H. Bird, Jr. Ann S. Cioffi Alice B. Hayes Edgar T. Mead TOWN CLERK TRUSTEE OF TRUST FUNDS Patricia H. Radway Roger C. Ball Frederick T.
    [Show full text]
  • Views of the Blackstone River and the Mumford River
    THE SHlNER~ AND ITS USE AS A SOURCE OF INCOME IN WORCESTER, AND SOUTHEASTERN WORCESTER COUNTY, MASSACHUSETTS By Robert William Spayne S.B., State Teachers College at Worcester, Massachusetts 19,3 A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Oberlin College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in the Department of Geography CONTENTS Ie INTRODUCTION Location of Thesis Area 1 Purpose of Study 1 Methods of Study 1 Acknowledgments 2 II. GEOGRAPHY OF SOUTHERN WORCESTER COUNTY 4 PIiYSICAL GEOGRAPHY 4 Topography 4 stream Systems 8 Ponds 11 Artificial 11 Glacial 12 Ponds for Bait Fishing 14 .1 oJ Game Fishing Ponds 15 Climatic Characteristics 16 Weather 18 POPULATION 20 Size of Population 20 Distribution of Population 21 Industrialization 22 III. GEOGRAPHICAL BASIS FOR TEE SHINER INDUSTRY 26 Recreational Demands 26 Game Fish Resources 26 l~umber of ;Ponds 28 Number of Fishermerf .. 29 Demand for Bait 30 l IV. GENERAL NATURE OF THE BAIT INDUSTRY 31 ,~ Number of Bait Fishermen 31 .1 Range in Size of Operations 32 Nature of Typical Operations 34 Personality of the Bait Fishermen 34 V. THE SHINER - ITS DESCRIPTION, HABITS AND , CHARACTERISTICS 35 VI. 'STANDARD AND IlIIlPROVISED EQUIPMENT USED IN .~ THE IhllUSTRY 41 Transportation 41 Keeping the Bait Alive 43 Foul Weather Gear 47 Types of Nets 48 SUCCESSFUL METHODS USED IN NETTING BAIT 52 Open Water Fishing 5'2 " Ice Fishing 56 .-:-) VII. ECONOMIC IMPORTANCE OF THE SHINER INDUSTRY ~O VIII. FUTURE OUTLOOK FOR THE SHINER INDUSTRY 62 IX. BIBLIOGRAPHY 69 x. APPENDIX 72 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Following Page .
    [Show full text]
  • Mink Brook Watershed
    In an effort to evaluate the status of wild brook trout populations in the Mink Brook watershed, the New Hampshire Fish and Game Department with the assistance of the Hanover Conservancy, conducted a watershed wide survey in the summer of 2011. These surveys are part of a statewide effort to quantify the presence of self-sustaining brook trout ( Salvelinus fontinalis ) populations and to gather some preliminary information on their habitat. These surveys also provide some information on the general fish community in the Upper Valley of New Hampshire. An assessment to determine the current status of brook trout within this region of New Hampshire is of particular interest to the overall goal of prioritizing protection and restoration efforts because quantitative information regarding this region of the state, as with most of the tributary watersheds to the Connecticut River, is limited. It is expected that this document could be used as a guidance tool for the protection of both water quality and wild brook trout in the Mink Brook watershed. As the Upper Valley region continues to grow, more pressure is placed on the ability to sustain water quality and habitat for wild brook trout populations. Statewide Distribution of Wild Brook Trout 1983-2011 (N=2709 survey sites) Wild Brook Trout Captured Wild Brook Trout Not Found Background Brook trout are the only native stream dwelling trout species in New Hampshire, having a historic range that extended from Georgia to eastern Canada. It is believed that wild brook trout were once present throughout all watersheds in New Hampshire. Increased stream temperatures, changes to water chemistry, habitat fragmentation, increased rates of predation and competition, loss of spawning locations, and the loss of stream habitat complexity have led to reduced and isolated populations of wild brook trout both in New Hampshire and throughout the species’ native range in the eastern portions of the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Official List of Public Waters
    Official List of Public Waters New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services Water Division Dam Bureau 29 Hazen Drive PO Box 95 Concord, NH 03302-0095 (603) 271-3406 https://www.des.nh.gov NH Official List of Public Waters Revision Date October 9, 2020 Robert R. Scott, Commissioner Thomas E. O’Donovan, Division Director OFFICIAL LIST OF PUBLIC WATERS Published Pursuant to RSA 271:20 II (effective June 26, 1990) IMPORTANT NOTE: Do not use this list for determining water bodies that are subject to the Comprehensive Shoreland Protection Act (CSPA). The CSPA list is available on the NHDES website. Public waters in New Hampshire are prescribed by common law as great ponds (natural waterbodies of 10 acres or more in size), public rivers and streams, and tidal waters. These common law public waters are held by the State in trust for the people of New Hampshire. The State holds the land underlying great ponds and tidal waters (including tidal rivers) in trust for the people of New Hampshire. Generally, but with some exceptions, private property owners hold title to the land underlying freshwater rivers and streams, and the State has an easement over this land for public purposes. Several New Hampshire statutes further define public waters as including artificial impoundments 10 acres or more in size, solely for the purpose of applying specific statutes. Most artificial impoundments were created by the construction of a dam, but some were created by actions such as dredging or as a result of urbanization (usually due to the effect of road crossings obstructing flow and increased runoff from the surrounding area).
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Revisions to 314 CMR 4.00 (Tables and Figures, Clean)
    Please see the 314 CMR 4.00 Summary and Notice to Reviewers document, as well as the Fact Sheets on particular topics for additional information and explanatory detail associated with these proposed regulatory changes. These documents are available on the MassDEP Website. 314 CMR: DIVISION OF WATER POLLUTION CONTROL 4.06: continued LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES* TABLE & TABLE AND CORRESPONDING FIGURE TITLE Page # FIGURE # A (Figure only) River Basins and Coastal Drainage Areas TF-2 1 Blackstone River Basin TF-3 2 Boston Harbor Drainage Area (formerly Boston Harbor Drainage System and Mystic, Neponset and Weymouth & Weir River Basins) TF-8 3 Buzzards Bay Coastal Drainage Area TF-17 4 Cape Cod Coastal Drainage Area TF-22 5 Charles River Basin TF-30 6 Chicopee River Basin TF-34 7 Connecticut River Basin TF-40 8 Deerfield River Basin TF-49 9 Farmington River Basin TF-58 10 French River Basin TF-60 11 Housatonic River Basin TF-62 12 Hudson River Basin (formerly Hoosic, Kinderhook and Bashbish) TF-70 13 Ipswich River Basin TF-76 14 Islands Coastal Drainage Area (formerly Martha's Vineyard and Nantucket) TF-79 15 Merrimack River Basin TF-81 16 Millers River Basin TF-86 17 Narragansett Bay and Mount Hope Bay Drainage Area TF-90 18 Nashua River Basin TF-93 19 North Coastal Drainage Area TF-103 20 Parker River Basin TF-109 21 Quinebaug River Basin TF-113 22 Shawsheen River Basin TF-116 23 South Coastal Drainage Area TF-118 24 Sudbury, Assabet, and Concord (SuAsCo) River Basin (formerly Concord) TF-123 25 Taunton River Basin TF-128 26 Ten Mile River Basin TF-132 27 Westfield River Basin TF-134 28 (Table only) Site-Specific Criteria TF-144 29 (Table only) GenerallyApplicable Criteria: 29a.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 9: References
    CHAPTER 9: REFERENCES Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE). 1970. New England Division. Small Navigation Project - New Bedford and Fairhaven Harbor, Massachusetts - Detailed Project Report. ------. 1988. Wetland Study Report for the New Bedford Superfund Site. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, New England Division. Prepared by IEP, Inc., Final Report. ------. 1990. New Bedford Harbor Superfund Pilot Study. Evaluation of Dredging and Dredged Material Disposal. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, New England Division. May 1990. Bartlett, M. 1997. Letter to Jack Terrill dated February 12, 1997. Battelle Memorial Institute. 1990. Modeling of the Transport, Distribution, and Fate of PCBs and Heavy Metals in the Acushnet River/New Bedford Harbor/Buzzards Bay System. Volume I. Final Report. Contract No. 4236-MOD-0019 to EBASCO Services, Inc. Belding, D.L. 1909. A Report Upon the Mollusk Fisheries of Massachusetts. Boston: Wright and Potter. ------. 1912. A Report upon the Quahog and Oyster Fisheries of Massachusetts. Division of Marine Fisheries. ------. 1912. A Report upon the Alewife Fisheries of Massachusetts. Division of Fisheries and Game. Bellmer, R. J. 1988. The infaunal community of a polychlorinated biphenyls polluted harbor, New Bedford, Massachusetts, USA. Waltham, MA: ACOE New England Division. Bigelow, H. B., & Schroeder, W. C. 1953. Fishes of the Gulf of Maine. Washington: USGPO. Boss, J. A. and J. D. Thomas, 1983. New Bedford - A Pictorial History. The Donning Company. Norfolk, VA. Brady, Phillip, Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries, Sandwich Laboratory. Personal communication to James Turek, VHB Inc., 1996. Buzzards Bay Project. 1991. Buzzards Bay Comprehensive Conservation and Management Plan. Cardin, S.X., A.B. Howe, S.J.
    [Show full text]
  • Boston Harbor South Watersheds 2004 Assessment Report
    Boston Harbor South Watersheds 2004 Assessment Report June 30, 2004 Prepared for: Massachusetts Executive Office of Environmental Affairs Prepared by: Neponset River Watershed Association University of Massachusetts, Urban Harbors Institute Boston Harbor Association Fore River Watershed Association Weir River Watershed Association Contents How rapidly is open space being lost?.......................................................35 Introduction ix What % of the shoreline is publicly accessible?........................................35 References for Boston Inner Harbor Watershed........................................37 Common Assessment for All Watersheds 1 Does bacterial pollution limit fishing or recreation? ...................................1 Neponset River Watershed 41 Does nutrient pollution pose a threat to aquatic life? ..................................1 Does bacterial pollution limit fishing or recreational use? ......................46 Do dissolved oxygen levels support aquatic life?........................................5 Does nutrient pollution pose a threat to aquatic life or other uses?...........48 Are there other water quality problems? ....................................................6 Do dissolved oxygen (DO) levels support aquatic life? ..........................51 Do water supply or wastewater management impact instream flows?........7 Are there other indicators that limit use of the watershed? .....................53 Roughly what percentage of the watersheds is impervious? .....................8 Do water supply,
    [Show full text]
  • The Acushnet River Restoration Project: Restoring Diadromous Populations to a Superfund Site in Southeastern Massachusetts
    Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries Technical Report TR-56 The Acushnet River Restoration Project: Restoring Diadromous Populations to a Superfund Site in Southeastern Massachusetts J.J. Sheppard1, S. Block2, H.L Becker3, and D. Quinn4 1Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries South Shore Field Station 1213 Purchase Street, 3rd Floor New Bedford, MA 02740 2National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Restoration Center 55 Great Republic Drive Gloucester, MA 01930 3EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, Inc 221 Sun Valley Boulevard, Suite D Lincoln, NE 68528 4DQ Engineering 11 Hickory Lane Walpole, MA 02081 Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs Department of Fish and Game Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries Technical Report Technical March 2014 Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries Technical Report Series Managing Editor: Michael P. Armstrong Technical and Copy Editor: Elaine Brewer The Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries Technical Reports present information and data pertinent to the management, biology and commercial and recreational fisheries of anadromous, estuarine, and marine organisms of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and adjacent waters. The series presents information in a timely fashion that is of limited scope or is useful to a smaller, specific audience and therefore may not be appropriate for national or international journals. Included in this series are data summaries, reports of monitoring programs, and results of studies that are directed at specific management problems. All Reports in the series are available for download in PDF format at: http://www.mass.gov/eea/agencies/dfg/dmf/publications/technical.html or hard copies may be obtained from the Annisquam River Marine Fisheries Station, 30 Emerson Ave., Gloucester, MA 01930 USA (978-282-0308).
    [Show full text]
  • Route 140 Corridor Study and Plan.3 General
    ROOUTEUTE 114040 COORRIDORRRIDOR PLLANAN SShrewsburyhrewsbury SStreettreet BBoylston,oylston, MMassachusettsassachusetts Prepared for: Town of Boylston, Massachusetts Blatman, Bobrowski, and Mead, LLC Prepared by: Community Opportunities Group, Inc. Boston, Massachusetts March 2010 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................................................1 Key Findings .......................................................................................................................................................................1 Key Recommendations......................................................................................................................................................1 INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................................................................................3 Population and Household Characteristics ....................................................................................................................4 Industries and Employment .............................................................................................................................................7 Economic Development Capacity & Resources.............................................................................................................9 CORRIDOR PLANNING AREA .....................................................................................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • 40B Or Not to 40B in Saugus Nahant Rallies
    WEDNESDAY, JULY 17, 2019 Nahant Senator sees licensing rallies the undocumented as safe By Thor Jourgensen (RMV) cannot issue a driver’s license to for ITEM STAFF anyone that cannot prove U.S. citizen- ship or lawful presence in the United LYNN — It’s time to shatter nega- States,” Registry spokeswoman Judith wetlands tive myths dogging proposals to allow Reardon Riley said in a statement. undocumented immigrants to obtain Crighton said the Work and Family By Bridget Turcotte driver’s licenses, said state Sen. Bren- Mobility Act would allow an undocu- ITEM STAFF dan Crighton. mented immigrant to bring a passport The Lynn Democrat and state Repre- from their country of origin or obtain NAHANT — Several Nah- sentatives Tricia Farley-Bouvier (Pitts- PHOTO | SHNS documentation from their country’s ant residents boarded a bus eld) and Christine Barber (Somer- consulate and present the documents to the Massachusetts State From left, state Sen. Brendan Crighton, Rep. ville-Medford) support allowing state along with a standard license applica- House Tuesday morning to Tricia Farley-Bouvier and Rep. Christine residents to apply for a standard driv- tion at the RMV. support a bill that would Barber are sponsoring legislation that would er’s license regardless of immigration “They would go through the same change a law that enables allow undocumented immigrants to acquire status. religious and education non- standard Massachusetts driver’s licenses. “The Registry of Motor Vehicles CRIGHTON, A3 pro ts to bypass local envi- ronmental regulations. An act to prevent nonprof- it institutions from avoiding wetlands or natural resource Mother 40B or protections under the so- called Dover Amendment, proposed by State Rep.
    [Show full text]
  • Waterbody Name Lat Long Location Town Stage Ruler Rationale Number # Subwatershed A-01-01-010 BB010 No Beaver Brook Beaver Brook Jewish Comm
    Master Site List 2007 Site Rev. Site Watershed CWF Waterbody Name Lat Long Location Town Stage Ruler Rationale Number # Subwatershed A-01-01-010 BB010 No Beaver Brook Beaver Brook Jewish Comm. 42.29549 -71.83817 On footbridge located south of Worcester On footbridge Baseline near beginning Ctr. northerly driveway at 633 of Beaver Brook Salisbury St. at the Jewish Community Center A-01-01-030 BB030 No Beaver Brook Beaver Brook Park Ave. 42.25028 -71.83142 Upstream of confluence of Worcester On abutment on To compare with Carwash Beaver Brook and Tatnuck south side of street Tatnuck Brook just Brook at Clark Fields carwash on above confluence Park Ave. A-02-01-010 BMB010 No Broad Meadow Broad Meadow Dunkirk 42.24258 -71.77599 At end of Dunkirk Ave, slightly Worcester Baseline where brook Brook Brook downstram of culvert. outfalls from culvert A-02-01-020 BMB020 No Broad Meadow Broad Meadow Dupuis Ave. 42.23554 -71.77297 Walk around lawn. Just before Worcester To monitor impacts of Brook Brook Beaver Brook enters pipe 50' Beaver Dam - see how upstream of pipe. quality improves after going through natural area A-02-01-040 BMB040 No Broad Meadow Broad Meadow Holdridge 42.23092 -71.76782 Downstream of stone bridge on Worcester 15 feet below Midway on course Brook Brook Holdridge Trail - on the west stone bridge on through wildlife sanctuary bank tree A-02-01-050 BMB050 No Broad Meadow Broad Meadow Dosco 42.19267 -71.75017 Beside Dosco Sheet Metal Millbury Attached to Dorothy Brook as it flows Brook Brook Company; 30 yards downstream concrete wall into the Blackstone River from Grafton St.
    [Show full text]
  • Bristol County, Massachusetts (All Jurisdictions)
    VOLUME 2 OF 4 BRISTOL COUNTY, MASSACHUSETTS (ALL JURISDICTIONS) Bristol County COMMUNITY NAME COMMUNITY NUMBER ACUSHNET, TOWN OF 250048 ATTLEBORO, CITY OF 250049 BERKLEY, TOWN OF 250050 DARTMOUTH, TOWN OF 250051 DIGHTON, TOWN OF 250052 EASTON, TOWN OF 250053 FAIRHAVEN, TOWN OF 250054 FALL RIVER, CITY OF 250055 FREETOWN, TOWN OF 250056 MANSFIELD, TOWN OF 250057 NEW BEDFORD, CITY OF 255216 NORTH ATTLEBOROUGH, TOWN OF 250059 NORTON, TOWN OF 250060 RAYNHAM, TOWN OF 250061 REHOBOTH, TOWN OF 250062 SEEKONK, TOWN OF 250063 SOMERSET, TOWN OF 255220 SWANSEA, TOWN OF 255221 TAUTON, CITY OF 250066 WESTPORT, TOWN OF 255224 REVISED JULY 16, 2014 FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 25005CV002B NOTICE TO FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY USERS Communities participating in the National Flood Insurance Program have established repositories of flood hazard data for floodplain management and flood insurance purposes. This Flood Insurance Study (FIS) may not contain all data available within the repository. It is advisable to contact the community repository for any additional data. Selected Flood Insurance Rate Map panels for the community contain information that was previously shown separately on the corresponding Flood Boundary and Floodway Map panels (e.g., floodways, cross sections). In addition, former flood hazard zone designations have been changed as follows: Old Zone New Zone A1 through A30 AE V1 through V30 VE (shaded) B X C X Part or all of this Flood Insurance Study may be revised and republished at any time. In addition, part of this Flood Insurance Study may be revised by the Letter of Map Revision process, which does not involve republication or redistribution of the Flood Insurance Study.
    [Show full text]