Evolution of the Supercluster-Void Network

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Evolution of the Supercluster-Void Network AA manuscript no ASTRONOMY will b e inserted by hand later AND Your thesaurus co des are ASTROPHYSICS Evolution of the Sup erclusterVoid Network Patrick Frisch Jaan Einasto Maret Einasto Wolfram Freudling Klaus J Fricke Mirt Gramann Veikko Saar Ott Toomet University Observatory D Gottingen Tartu Astrophysical Observatory EE Toravere Estonia Space Telescope Europ ean Co ordinating Facility D Garching Europ ean Southern Observatory D Garching Princeton University Observatory Peyton Hall Princeton NJ Received th July accepted th September Abstract Recently the observed cellular nature of the ative p ower index on large scales the mass distribution largescale structure of the Universe with its quasiregular function of clusters is to o shallow In the HDM mo del no pattern of sup erclusters and voids has b een p ointed out p ower on small scales the clusterdened voids are com by several authors In this pap er we investigate prop erties pletely empty CDMmo dels have no welldened max of the initial p ower sp ectrum which lead to prediction of imum of the sp ectrum and the cellular distribution of structure consistent with these observations For this pur sup erclusters and voids is insuciently developed in this p ose we analyze the evolution of structure within four sets case of and dimensional cosmological mo dels which dier We also investigated the dynamical evolution of the in their initial p ower sp ectrum The mo dels include HDM sup erclustervoid structure The results show that the ba and CDM mo dels as well as double p owerlaw mo dels We sic sup erclustervoid network is formed very early and is discuss in detail the impact of mo del parameters such as essentially given by initial conditions the large scale and small scale p ower and the p osition and height of the maxima of the p ower sp ectra on the predicted Key words cosmology theory galaxies clustering structure Several statistical techniques were employed to largescale structure of the Universe metho ds numerical compare the mo dels with observations They include the analysis of the distribution of voids dened by rich and p o or clusters of galaxies voids dened by galaxies clus INTRODUCTION ters and sup erclusters In addition the cluster correlation function is compared Several recent studies of the largescale distribution of We conclude that the observed regular distribution of clusters of galaxies have found a quasiregular cellular pattern of sup erclusters and clusterdened voids su sup erclusters and voids can b e repro duced only if the sp ec p ervoids Broadhurst et al Bahcall Tully trum of density uctuations has a welldened maximum et al Einasto et al b hereafter EETDA Vet The wavelength of the maximum determines the scale of astro-ph/9503037 8 Mar 1995 the structure Smallscale uctuations determine the ne tolani et al ab Sup erclusters separate sup ervoids structure of the Universe Largescale uctuations mo d at fairly regular intervals The characteristic scale of the sup erclustervoid network is h Mp c The regu ulate the ne structure and determine the quasiregular lar distribution of sup erclusters of galaxies can b e seen structure on sup ercluster scales in Figures and by EETDA and Figure a of Lindner The b est agreement with observations was observed in et al where rich clusters are plotted in sup ergalac the mo del with the HarrisonZeldovich sp ectrum on large scales a p ower index n on small scales and a tic rectangular co ordinates An essential prop erty of the maximum of the p ower sp ectrum at h Mp c In distribution is the regularity of the structure near the sup ergalactic equatorial plane z there are at fairly this mo del the distribution of masses of clusters and su regular intervals six rich sup erclusters The distribution p erclusters the correlation function of clusters and the of rich sup erclusters in the vertical plane is very similar void distribution repro duce well the resp ective observed distributions see Tully et al Bahcall and EETDA As In mo dels with no p ower on large scales all sup erclus emphasized by Tully et al this distribution lo oks like a threedimensional chessboard ters are equal in mean density while in mo dels with neg P Frisch et al Evolution of the Sup erclusterVoid Network Sup erclusters are made up of a net of galaxy laments ter asso ciated with galaxies as well as individual clusters and knots clusters of galaxies The same constituents and sup erclusters is given in x In x we discuss the sta are also found in sup ervoids which contain lamentary tistical tests to b e applied Next we analyze mo dels for galaxy systems The largescale distribution of galaxies in various mo del parameters We change separately in x the the direction of the Coma and Hercules sup erclusters was p osition of the maximum in x smallscale p ower index studied by Lindner et al In front of these sup er in x largescale p ower index and in x the strength of clusters there is a large lowdensity region without any the maximum In this analysis of mo dels we use dierent rich clusters of galaxies the Northern Lo cal sup ervoid statistics sizes of voids dened by dierent ob jects the This lowdensity region embo dies numerous galaxy la mass distribution of clusters and sup erclusters the corre ments The basic dierence b etween the constituents of lation function In x we present results of the study of sup erclusters and sup ervoids lies in their richness in su the evolution of the structure in dierent mo dels The dis p erclusters systems of galaxies are much richer and denser cussion of our results is given in x Finally we summarize than in sup ervoids principal results of the study In this pap er h denotes the Hubble constant in units These observations raise several imp ortant questions of kms Mp c What causes the formation of a regular network of sup er clusters and sup ervoids Why do b oth sup erclusters and sup ervoids consist of lamentary structures of dierent MODELS richness A large b o dy of numerical simulations of the formation Model simulations of the structure in the Universe exists in the literature We use the particlemesh co de by Gramann to sim Mo dels with CDM p erturbation sp ectra have b een used ulate the evolution of the distribution of mass Most of the Efstathiou et al West et al Little and Wein investigations are done on twodimensional simulations b erg as well as simple p owerlaw mo dels Efstathiou Two dimensional mo delling is not only less demanding in et al Weinberg and Gunn Beacom et al using computer resources it also facilitates the easy in Melott Shandarin and combined CDM and HDM terpretation and graphical representation of results How mo dels Davis Summers and Schleger Holtzman and ever some asp ects of the structure can b e checked only Primack Klypin et al The formation of a by threedimensional mo delling we therefore also use a regular network of sup erclusters and sup ervoids has b een limited number of threedimensional mo dels Principal pa addressed so far only by Einasto and Gramann rameters of mo dels are given in Table They considered the problem however only qualitatively A quantitative study of the inuence of p erturbations of Table Data on mo dels used various scales using a broad set of initial conditions is still lacking Mo del D n m k L t The goal of this pap er is to mo del two observed h Mp c features of the large scale structure First we fo cus on the question what kind of initial conditions are required Mpk to repro duce the quasiregular distribution of sup erclus Mpk ters and sup ervoids Then we study which conditions are Mpk needed to explain the lamentary structure of galaxies in Mpi sup erclusters and sup ervoids Since initial conditions are Mpi given by the p ower sp ectrum our task is to nd a suitable Mpi initial p ower sp ectrum Direct determinations of the p ower sp ectrum on the scales of interest have to o large random HDM errors these scales are close to the size of the largest Mp volume for which data are available Thus we use an in Mpt direct metho d to investigate the b ehavior of the Universe Mp on large scales by mo delling the evolution of the struc ture and by comparing results with observed prop erties Np using various statistics For that purp ose we carried out CDM Nb o dy simulation to simulate the distribution of matter CDM Since the aim is the study of the inuence of largescale mo des of density p erturbations we consider a computa tional b ox which is considerably larger than the scale of Designations in the table are as follows D is the di the maximum of the p ower sp ectrum mension of the simulation is the density parameter n and m are eective p ower indices of the sp ectrum on large The pap er is organized as follows A description of the and short wavelengths resp ectively index indicates that mo del simulations and rules to identify the clustered mat P Frisch et al Evolution of the Sup erclusterVoid Network the sp ectral index corresp onds to dimensional case the designated as Mpi Mpi Mpi the last number cor index in dimensional case used in d calculations is resp onds to the absolute value of the sp ectral index in n n and m m k is the wavenumber cor dimensional case actual simulations have b een p erformed t resp onding to the maximum of the sp ectrum wavenumber in D and the index is resp ectively lower in absolute k corresp onds to the size of the computational b ox value Instead of a smo oth
Recommended publications
  • SDSS DR7 Superclusters Morphology
    A&A 532, A5 (2011) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201116564 & c ESO 2011 Astrophysics SDSS DR7 superclusters Morphology M. Einasto1,L.J.Liivamägi1,2,E.Tago1,E.Saar1,E.Tempel1,2,J.Einasto1, V. J. Martínez3, and P. Heinämäki4 1 Tartu Observatory, 61602 Tõravere, Estonia e-mail: [email protected] 2 Institute of Physics, Tartu University, Tähe 4, 51010 Tartu, Estonia 3 Observatori Astronòmic, Universitat de València, Apartat de Correus 22085, 46071 València, Spain 4 Tuorla Observatory, University of Turku, Väisäläntie 20, Piikkiö, Finland Received 24 January 2011 / Accepted 2 May 2011 ABSTRACT Aims. We study the morphology of a set of superclusters drawn from the SDSS DR7. Methods. We calculate the luminosity density field to determine superclusters from a flux-limited sample of galaxies from SDSS DR7 and select superclusters with 300 and more galaxies for our study. We characterise the morphology of superclusters using the fourth Minkowski functional V3, the morphological signature (the curve in the shapefinder’s K1-K2 plane) and the shape parameter (the ratio of the shapefinders K1/K2). We investigate the supercluster sample using multidimensional normal mixture modelling. We use Abell clusters to identify our superclusters with known superclusters and to study the large-scale distribution of superclusters. Results. The superclusters in our sample form three chains of superclusters; one of them is the Sloan Great Wall. Most superclusters have filament-like overall shapes. Superclusters can be divided into two sets; more elongated superclusters are more luminous, richer, have larger diameters and a more complex fine structure than less elongated superclusters. The fine structure of superclusters can be divided into four main morphological types: spiders, multispiders, filaments, and multibranching filaments.
    [Show full text]
  • Cosmicflows-3: Cosmography of the Local Void
    Draft version May 22, 2019 Preprint typeset using LATEX style AASTeX6 v. 1.0 COSMICFLOWS-3: COSMOGRAPHY OF THE LOCAL VOID R. Brent Tully, Institute for Astronomy, University of Hawaii, 2680 Woodlawn Drive, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA Daniel Pomarede` Institut de Recherche sur les Lois Fondamentales de l'Univers, CEA, Universite' Paris-Saclay, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France Romain Graziani University of Lyon, UCB Lyon 1, CNRS/IN2P3, IPN Lyon, France Hel´ ene` M. Courtois University of Lyon, UCB Lyon 1, CNRS/IN2P3, IPN Lyon, France Yehuda Hoffman Racah Institute of Physics, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, 91904 Israel Edward J. Shaya University of Maryland, Astronomy Department, College Park, MD 20743, USA ABSTRACT Cosmicflows-3 distances and inferred peculiar velocities of galaxies have permitted the reconstruction of the structure of over and under densities within the volume extending to 0:05c. This study focuses on the under dense regions, particularly the Local Void that lies largely in the zone of obscuration and consequently has received limited attention. Major over dense structures that bound the Local Void are the Perseus-Pisces and Norma-Pavo-Indus filaments sepa- rated by 8,500 km s−1. The void network of the universe is interconnected and void passages are found from the Local Void to the adjacent very large Hercules and Sculptor voids. Minor filaments course through voids. A particularly interesting example connects the Virgo and Perseus clusters, with several substantial galaxies found along the chain in the depths of the Local Void. The Local Void has a substantial dynamical effect, causing a deviant motion of the Local Group of 200 − 250 km s−1.
    [Show full text]
  • Modelling the Size Distribution of Cosmic Voids
    Alma Mater Studiorum | Universita` di Bologna SCUOLA DI SCIENZE Corso di Laurea Magistrale in Astrofisica e Cosmologia Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia Modelling the size distribution of Cosmic Voids Tesi di Laurea Magistrale Candidato: Relatore: Tommaso Ronconi Lauro Moscardini Correlatori: Marco Baldi Federico Marulli Sessione I Anno Accademico 2015-2016 Contents Contentsi Introduction vii 1 The cosmological framework1 1.1 The Friedmann-Robertson-Walker metric...............2 1.1.1 The Hubble Law and the reddening of distant objects....4 1.1.2 Friedmann Equations......................5 1.1.3 Friedmann Models........................6 1.1.4 Flat VS Curved Universes....................8 1.2 The Standard Cosmological Model...................9 1.3 Jeans Theory and Expanding Universes................ 12 1.3.1 Instability in a Static Universe................. 13 1.3.2 Instability in an Expanding Universe.............. 14 1.3.3 Primordial Density Fluctuations................ 15 1.3.4 Non-Linear Evolution...................... 17 2 Cosmic Voids in the large scale structure 19 2.1 Spherical evolution............................ 20 2.1.1 Overdensities........................... 23 2.1.2 Underdensities.......................... 24 2.2 Excursion set formalism......................... 26 2.2.1 Press-Schechter halo mass function and exstension...... 29 2.3 Void size function............................. 31 2.3.1 Sheth and van de Weygaert model............... 33 2.3.2 Volume conserving model (Vdn)................ 35 2.4 Halo bias................................. 36 3 Methods 38 3.1 CosmoBolognaLib: C++ libraries for cosmological calculations... 38 3.2 N-body simulations............................ 39 3.2.1 The set of cosmological simulations............... 40 3.3 Void Finders............................... 42 3.4 From centres to spherical non-overlapped voids............ 43 3.4.1 Void centres...........................
    [Show full text]
  • Undergraduate Thesis on Supermassive Black Holes
    Into the Void: Mass Function of Supermassive Black Holes in the local universe A Thesis Presented to The Division of Mathematics and Natural Sciences Reed College In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Bachelor of Arts Farhanul Hasan May 2018 Approved for the Division (Physics) Alison Crocker Acknowledgements Writing a thesis is a long and arduous process. There were times when it seemed further from my reach than the galaxies I studied. It’s with great relief and pride that I realize I made it this far and didn’t let it overpower me at the end. I have so many people to thank in very little space, and so much to be grateful for. Alison, you were more than a phenomenal thesis adviser, you inspired me to believe that Astro is cool. Your calm helped me stop freaking out at the end of February, when I had virtually no work to show for, and a back that ached with every step I took. Thank you for pushing me forward. Working with you in two different research projects were very enriching experiences, and I appreciate you not giving up on me, even after all the times I blanked on how to proceed forward. Thank you Johnny, for being so appreciative of my work, despite me bringing in a thesis that I myself barely understood when I brought it to your table. I was overjoyed when I heard you wanted to be on my thesis board! Thanks to Reed, for being the quirky, intellectual community that it prides itself on being.
    [Show full text]
  • An Outline of Stellar Astrophysics with Problems and Solutions
    An Outline of Stellar Astrophysics with Problems and Solutions Using Maple R and Mathematica R Robert Roseberry 2016 1 Contents 1 Introduction 5 2 Electromagnetic Radiation 7 2.1 Specific intensity, luminosity and flux density ............7 Problem 1: luminous flux (**) . .8 Problem 2: galaxy fluxes (*) . .8 Problem 3: radiative pressure (**) . .9 2.2 Magnitude ...................................9 Problem 4: magnitude (**) . 10 2.3 Colour ..................................... 11 Problem 5: Planck{Stefan-Boltzmann{Wien{colour (***) . 13 Problem 6: Planck graph (**) . 13 Problem 7: radio and visual luminosity and brightness (***) . 14 Problem 8: Sirius (*) . 15 2.4 Emission Mechanisms: Continuum Emission ............. 15 Problem 9: Orion (***) . 17 Problem 10: synchrotron (***) . 18 Problem 11: Crab (**) . 18 2.5 Emission Mechanisms: Line Emission ................. 19 Problem 12: line spectrum (*) . 20 2.6 Interference: Line Broadening, Scattering, and Zeeman splitting 21 Problem 13: natural broadening (**) . 21 Problem 14: Doppler broadening (*) . 22 Problem 15: Thomson Cross Section (**) . 23 Problem 16: Inverse Compton scattering (***) . 24 Problem 17: normal Zeeman splitting (**) . 25 3 Measuring Distance 26 3.1 Parallax .................................... 27 Problem 18: parallax (*) . 27 3.2 Doppler shifting ............................... 27 Problem 19: supernova distance (***) . 28 3.3 Spectroscopic parallax and Main Sequence fitting .......... 28 Problem 20: Main Sequence fitting (**) . 29 3.4 Standard candles ............................... 30 Video: supernova light curve . 30 Problem 21: Cepheid distance (*) . 30 3.5 Tully-Fisher relation ............................ 31 3.6 Lyman-break galaxies and the Hubble flow .............. 33 4 Transparent Gas: Interstellar Gas Clouds and the Atmospheres and Photospheres of Stars 35 2 4.1 Transfer equation and optical depth .................. 36 Problem 22: optical depth (**) . 37 4.2 Plane-parallel atmosphere, Eddington's approximation, and limb darkening ..................................
    [Show full text]
  • Topology of Large Scale Under-Dense Regions
    MNRAS 000,1{12 () Preprint 9 September 2018 Compiled using MNRAS LATEX style file v3.0 Topology of large scale under-dense regions A. M. So ltan? Nicolaus Copernicus Astronomical Centre, Polish Academy of Science, Bartycka 18, 00-716 Warsaw, Poland Accepted . Received ; in original form ABSTRACT We investigate the large scale matter distribution adopting QSOs as matter tracer. The quasar catalogue based on the SDSS DR7 is used. The void finding algorithm is presented and statistical properties of void sizes and shapes are determined. Number of large voids in the quasar distribution is greater than the number of the same size voids found in the random distribution. The largest voids with diameters exceeding 300 Mpc indicate an existence of comparable size areas of lower than the average matter density. No void-void space correlations have been detected, and no larger scale deviations from the uniform distribution are revealed. The average CMB temperature in the directions of the largest voids is lower than in the surrounding areas by 0:0046 ± 0:0028 mK. This figure is compared to the amplitude of the expected temperature depletion caused by the Integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect. Key words: Large-scale structure of universe { cosmic background radiation { quasars: general. 1 INTRODUCTION voluminous data sets with low observational selection bias (e.g. Croom et al. 2001, see below). Clustering properties of Statistical characteristics of matter distribution depend on quasars and galaxies are not distinctly different at small and a number of cosmological parameters. Albeit structures on medium scales (see Ross et al. 2009), what assures us that at various scales carry the information of cosmological rele- scales of several hundreds Mpc quasar distribution is repre- vance, matter agglomerations on the largest scales attract sentative for the luminous matter distribution.
    [Show full text]
  • And Ecclesiastical Cosmology
    GSJ: VOLUME 6, ISSUE 3, MARCH 2018 101 GSJ: Volume 6, Issue 3, March 2018, Online: ISSN 2320-9186 www.globalscientificjournal.com DEMOLITION HUBBLE'S LAW, BIG BANG THE BASIS OF "MODERN" AND ECCLESIASTICAL COSMOLOGY Author: Weitter Duckss (Slavko Sedic) Zadar Croatia Pусскй Croatian „If two objects are represented by ball bearings and space-time by the stretching of a rubber sheet, the Doppler effect is caused by the rolling of ball bearings over the rubber sheet in order to achieve a particular motion. A cosmological red shift occurs when ball bearings get stuck on the sheet, which is stretched.“ Wikipedia OK, let's check that on our local group of galaxies (the table from my article „Where did the blue spectral shift inside the universe come from?“) galaxies, local groups Redshift km/s Blueshift km/s Sextans B (4.44 ± 0.23 Mly) 300 ± 0 Sextans A 324 ± 2 NGC 3109 403 ± 1 Tucana Dwarf 130 ± ? Leo I 285 ± 2 NGC 6822 -57 ± 2 Andromeda Galaxy -301 ± 1 Leo II (about 690,000 ly) 79 ± 1 Phoenix Dwarf 60 ± 30 SagDIG -79 ± 1 Aquarius Dwarf -141 ± 2 Wolf–Lundmark–Melotte -122 ± 2 Pisces Dwarf -287 ± 0 Antlia Dwarf 362 ± 0 Leo A 0.000067 (z) Pegasus Dwarf Spheroidal -354 ± 3 IC 10 -348 ± 1 NGC 185 -202 ± 3 Canes Venatici I ~ 31 GSJ© 2018 www.globalscientificjournal.com GSJ: VOLUME 6, ISSUE 3, MARCH 2018 102 Andromeda III -351 ± 9 Andromeda II -188 ± 3 Triangulum Galaxy -179 ± 3 Messier 110 -241 ± 3 NGC 147 (2.53 ± 0.11 Mly) -193 ± 3 Small Magellanic Cloud 0.000527 Large Magellanic Cloud - - M32 -200 ± 6 NGC 205 -241 ± 3 IC 1613 -234 ± 1 Carina Dwarf 230 ± 60 Sextans Dwarf 224 ± 2 Ursa Minor Dwarf (200 ± 30 kly) -247 ± 1 Draco Dwarf -292 ± 21 Cassiopeia Dwarf -307 ± 2 Ursa Major II Dwarf - 116 Leo IV 130 Leo V ( 585 kly) 173 Leo T -60 Bootes II -120 Pegasus Dwarf -183 ± 0 Sculptor Dwarf 110 ± 1 Etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Astronomy 422
    Astronomy 422 Lecture 15: Expansion and Large Scale Structure of the Universe Key concepts: Hubble Flow Clusters and Large scale structure Gravitational Lensing Sunyaev-Zeldovich Effect Expansion and age of the Universe • Slipher (1914) found that most 'spiral nebulae' were redshifted. • Hubble (1929): "Spiral nebulae" are • other galaxies. – Measured distances with Cepheids – Found V=H0d (Hubble's Law) • V is called recessional velocity, but redshift due to stretching of photons as Universe expands. • V=H0D is natural result of uniform expansion of the universe, and also provides a powerful distance determination method. • However, total observed redshift is due to expansion of the universe plus a galaxy's motion through space (peculiar motion). – For example, the Milky Way and M31 approaching each other at 119 km/s. • Hubble Flow : apparent motion of galaxies due to expansion of space. v ~ cz • Cosmological redshift: stretching of photon wavelength due to expansion of space. Recall relativistic Doppler shift: Thus, as long as H0 constant For z<<1 (OK within z ~ 0.1) What is H0? Main uncertainty is distance, though also galaxy peculiar motions play a role. Measurements now indicate H0 = 70.4 ± 1.4 (km/sec)/Mpc. Sometimes you will see For example, v=15,000 km/s => D=210 Mpc = 150 h-1 Mpc. Hubble time The Hubble time, th, is the time since Big Bang assuming a constant H0. How long ago was all of space at a single point? Consider a galaxy now at distance d from us, with recessional velocity v. At time th ago it was at our location For H0 = 71 km/s/Mpc Large scale structure of the universe • Density fluctuations evolve into structures we observe (galaxies, clusters etc.) • On scales > galaxies we talk about Large Scale Structure (LSS): – groups, clusters, filaments, walls, voids, superclusters • To map and quantify the LSS (and to compare with theoretical predictions), we use redshift surveys.
    [Show full text]
  • Monthly Newsletter of the Durban Centre - March 2018
    Page 1 Monthly Newsletter of the Durban Centre - March 2018 Page 2 Table of Contents Chairman’s Chatter …...…………………….……….………..….…… 3 Andrew Gray …………………………………………...………………. 5 The Hyades Star Cluster …...………………………….…….……….. 6 At the Eye Piece …………………………………………….….…….... 9 The Cover Image - Antennae Nebula …….……………………….. 11 Galaxy - Part 2 ….………………………………..………………….... 13 Self-Taught Astronomer …………………………………..………… 21 The Month Ahead …..…………………...….…….……………..…… 24 Minutes of the Previous Meeting …………………………….……. 25 Public Viewing Roster …………………………….……….…..……. 26 Pre-loved Telescope Equipment …………………………...……… 28 ASSA Symposium 2018 ………………………...……….…......…… 29 Member Submissions Disclaimer: The views expressed in ‘nDaba are solely those of the writer and are not necessarily the views of the Durban Centre, nor the Editor. All images and content is the work of the respective copyright owner Page 3 Chairman’s Chatter By Mike Hadlow Dear Members, The third month of the year is upon us and already the viewing conditions have been more favourable over the last few nights. Let’s hope it continues and we have clear skies and good viewing for the next five or six months. Our February meeting was well attended, with our main speaker being Dr Matt Hilton from the Astrophysics and Cosmology Research Unit at UKZN who gave us an excellent presentation on gravity waves. We really have to be thankful to Dr Hilton from ACRU UKZN for giving us his time to give us presentations and hope that we can maintain our relationship with ACRU and that we can draw other speakers from his colleagues and other research students! Thanks must also go to Debbie Abel and Piet Strauss for their monthly presentations on NASA and the sky for the following month, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • The Aspen–Amsterdam Void Finder Comparison Project
    University of Groningen The Aspen-Amsterdam void finder comparison project Colberg, Joerg M.; Pearce, Frazer; Foster, Caroline; Platen, Erwin; Brunino, Riccardo; Neyrinck, Mark; Basilakos, Spyros; Fairall, Anthony; Feldman, Hume; Gottloeber, Stefan Published in: Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13307.x IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below. Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Publication date: 2008 Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database Citation for published version (APA): Colberg, J. M., Pearce, F., Foster, C., Platen, E., Brunino, R., Neyrinck, M., ... van de Weygaert, R. (2008). The Aspen-Amsterdam void finder comparison project. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 387(2), 933-944. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13307.x Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nanograv 11 Yr Data Set: Limits on Supermassive Black Hole Binaries in Galaxies Within 500 Mpc
    The Astrophysical Journal, 914:121 (15pp), 2021 June 20 https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/abfcd3 © 2021. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. The NANOGrav 11 yr Data Set: Limits on Supermassive Black Hole Binaries in Galaxies within 500 Mpc Zaven Arzoumanian1, Paul T. Baker2 , Adam Brazier3, Paul R. Brook4,5 , Sarah Burke-Spolaor4,5 , Bence Becsy6 , Maria Charisi7,8,38 , Shami Chatterjee3 , James M. Cordes3 , Neil J. Cornish6 , Fronefield Crawford9 , H. Thankful Cromartie10 , Megan E. DeCesar11 , Paul B. Demorest12 , Timothy Dolch13,14 , Rodney D. Elliott15 , Justin A. Ellis16, Elizabeth C. Ferrara17 , Emmanuel Fonseca18 , Nathan Garver-Daniels4,5 , Peter A. Gentile4,5 , Deborah C. Good19 , Jeffrey S. Hazboun20 , Kristina Islo21, Ross J. Jennings3 , Megan L. Jones21 , Andrew R. Kaiser4,5 , David L. Kaplan21 , Luke Zoltan Kelley22 , Joey Shapiro Key20 , Michael T. Lam23,24 , T. Joseph W. Lazio7,25, Jing Luo26 , Ryan S. Lynch27 , Chung-Pei Ma28 , Dustin R. Madison4,5,39 , Maura A. McLaughlin4,5 , Chiara M. F. Mingarelli29,30 , Cherry Ng31 , David J. Nice11 , Timothy T. Pennucci32,33,40 , Nihan S. Pol4,5,8 , Scott M. Ransom32 , Paul S. Ray34 , Brent J. Shapiro-Albert4,5 , Xavier Siemens21,35 , Joseph Simon7,25 , Renée Spiewak36 , Ingrid H. Stairs19 , Daniel R. Stinebring37 , Kevin Stovall12 , Joseph K. Swiggum11,41 , Stephen R. Taylor8 , Michele Vallisneri7,25 , Sarah J. Vigeland21 , and Caitlin A. Witt4,5 The NANOGrav Collaboration 1 X-Ray Astrophysics Laboratory, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Code 662, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA 2 Department of Physics and Astronomy, Widener University, One University Place, Chester, PA 19013, USA 3 Cornell Center for Astrophysics and Planetary Science and Department of Astronomy, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA 4 Department of Physics and Astronomy, West Virginia University, P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Clusters of Galaxy Hierarchical Structure the Universe Shows Range of Patterns of Structures on Decidedly Different Scales
    Astronomy 218 Clusters of Galaxy Hierarchical Structure The Universe shows range of patterns of structures on decidedly different scales. Stars (typical diameter of d ~ 106 km) are found in gravitationally bound systems called star clusters (≲ 106 stars) and galaxies (106 ‒ 1012 stars). Galaxies (d ~ 10 kpc), composed of stars, star clusters, gas, dust and dark matter, are found in gravitationally bound systems called groups (< 50 galaxies) and clusters (50 ‒ 104 galaxies). Clusters (d ~ 1 Mpc), composed of galaxies, gas, and dark matter, are found in currently collapsing systems called superclusters. Superclusters (d ≲ 100 Mpc) are the largest known structures. The Local Group Three large spirals, the Milky Way Galaxy, Andromeda Galaxy(M31), and Triangulum Galaxy (M33) and their satellites make up the Local Group of galaxies. At least 45 galaxies are members of the Local Group, all within about 1 Mpc of the Milky Way. The mass of the Local Group is dominated by 11 11 10 M31 (7 × 10 M☉), MW (6 × 10 M☉), M33 (5 × 10 M☉) Virgo Cluster The nearest large cluster to the Local Group is the Virgo Cluster at a distance of 16 Mpc, has a width of ~2 Mpc though it is far from spherical. It covers 7° of the sky in the Constellations Virgo and Coma Berenices. Even these The 4 brightest very bright galaxies are giant galaxies are elliptical galaxies invisible to (M49, M60, M86 & the unaided M87). eye, mV ~ 9. Virgo Census The Virgo Cluster is loosely concentrated and irregularly shaped, making it fairly M88 M99 representative of the most M100 common class of clusters.
    [Show full text]