DOCSLIB.ORG

SPECIAL SECTION When Materials Speak About Ontology: a Hunter-Gatherer Perspective Beyond Tools and Function: the Selection of M

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SPECIAL SECTION When Materials Speak About Ontology: a Hunter-Gatherer Perspective Beyond Tools and Function: the Selection of M SPECIAL SECTION When Materials Speak about Ontology: A Hunter-Gatherer Perspective Beyond Tools and Function: The Selection of Materials and the Ontology of Hunter-Gatherers. Ethnographic Evidences and Implications for Palaeolithic Archaeology Ella Assaf & Francesca Romagnoli In this paper we discuss the universal selection of exceptional materials for tool making in prehistory. The interpretation suggested in the literature for these non-standard materials is usually limited to a general statement, considering possible aesthetic values or a general, mostly unexplained, symbolic meaning. We discuss the implications of viewing these materials as active agents and living vital beings in Palaeolithic archaeology as attested in indigenous hunter-gatherer communities all around the world. We suggest that the use of specific materials in the Palaeolithic was meaningful, and beyond its possible ‘symbolic’ meaning, it reflects deep familiarity and complex relations of early humans with the world surrounding them—humans and other-than- human persons (animals, plants, water and stones)—on which they were dependent. We discuss the perception of tools and the materials from which they are made as reflecting relationships, respectful behaviour and functionality from an ontological point of view. In this spirit, we suggest re-viewing materials as reflecting social, cosmological and ontological world-views of Palaeolithic humans, and looking beyond their economic, functional aspects, as did, perhaps, our ancestors themselves. Introduction anthropocentric, western and colonial one (Harris & Cipolla 2017). In contemporary indigenous societies, The earliest production and use of stone tools more rather than being a dividing element between than three million years ago was, no doubt, a turning humans and other elements of the world, tools are point in the history of humankind, considered by perceived as a bridge, connecting all of them. In some scholars to be one of the defining characteristics this light, various elements related to the making of the genus Homo, setting humans apart (e.g. process of these tools—including the selection of Man the Toolmaker, Oakley 1944; Holloway 1969; materials from which they are made—reflect the rela- Premack 2010, although this approach is less accept- tions between these elements. Can we speculate that able nowadays). One might consider this dichotom- similar perceptions were shared by humans in the ous human–animal perspective on tools as an distant past? Cambridge Archaeological Journal 31:2, 281–291 © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/coredoi:10.1017/S0959774320000359. IP address:Received 170.106.40.40 7 Aug 2019;, on Accepted01 Oct 2021 25 at Aug14:35:33 2020;, subject Revised to the 10 Cambridge Jul 2020 Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774320000359 Ella Assaf & Francesca Romagnoli This introductory paper is part of a special values or a general, mostly unexplained, symbolic section addressing the universal phenomenon of meaning. human selection of exceptional materials for tool Notwithstanding any of these explanations, making and its possible socio-cultural, cosmological there might have been other factors which influenced implications. The first part of this article will briefly choices of materials, and exceptional materials par- describe the main theme of this section and this ticularly, relating to the socio-cultural world of paper, its theoretical framework and the implications early humans and their ontological-cosmological for prehistoric archaeology. The second part will worldviews. But is it possible for us to comprehend, explore one line of thinking suggested for interpret- in general, this role of ‘material culture’ in the socio- ing this phenomenon: the relational-ontology cultural realms and in the ontology of ancient approach. Here, we will discuss the possible applica- humans? The relationship between humans and tion of this view to Lower Palaeolithic findings, and materiality has recently attracted much theoretical with regard to material selection for handaxe making interest in archaeology and various other disciplines in particular, as a test case. Finally, we will briefly (e.g. Bell & Spikins 2018; Herva 2009; Ingold 2000; present the case studies included in this thematic sec- Knappett 2002), but these issues remain under- tion and conclude with some thoughts that could explored in prehistoric archaeology. The contribu- guide further attempts to enlarge our understanding tions of this section, as well as this paper, attempt of archaeological hunter-gatherer societies, including to address some of these issues. the way in which they built their cosmological word Looking at the overview of ethnographic and and interacted with it. anthropological hunter-gatherer case studies pre- sented, and keeping in mind the archaeological evi- Human selection of exceptional materials: dence suggesting that past humans most probably considering socio-cultural, cosmological aspects had social and cognitive behaviours more complex than was thought a few years ago (here we only dis- For more than three million years, humans have been cuss a small number of these cases, but the recent sci- selecting, collecting and transporting various materi- entific Palaeolithic literature is increasingly als, mostly stones and minerals but also animal abundant), we cannot exclude that a different per- bones and shells, for the production of tools. This ception of artefacts was most probably present in seemingly basic activity is far from being trivial, the Palaeolithic period. Possibly, material cultural and it raises questions concerning the mode of adap- was produced not only for meeting functional tation, cost-benefit considerations and choices made needs, but it was a way to reflect and form relation- by early humans (Beck et al. 2002; Brantingham ships between a group and another group, a human 2003; Dibble 1991; Wilson 2007). Many studies and another human or other-than-human person and emphasize techno-economic considerations, such as between a human and the landscape. How can we the quality, size, availability and abundance of knap- enlarge our understanding of prehistory through ping materials as well as location of outcrops on the the notion that cultural material constituted a signifi- displacement to foraging, as leading reasons for cant part of the ontology and cosmology of early selection, transportation and use of knapping materi- human communities? als (Braun et al. 2009; Browne & Wilson 2011; Shick In this paper, we explore one line of thinking 1987; Stout et al. 2005). The situation is somewhat dif- suggested for interpreting this phenomenon: the ferent as regards ‘exceptional’ materials, that is, relational-ontology approach. We discuss the impli- unusual, non-standard materials identified in specific cations of viewing exceptional materials selected for archaeological contexts, such as stones with notice- tool making as active agents and living vital beings able aesthetic values, animal bones and shells, as in Palaeolithic archaeology as attested in indigenous well as materials originating from remote sources. hunter-gatherer communities worldwide. The capacity to differentiate these from the huge amount of other materials makes them more easily The relational-ontology view and the identifiable in the archaeological record (even if it is archaeological record possible that more common materials also have had meanings other than functional, as briefly noted in Ethnographic and archaeological literature suggests this paper). These exceptional materials, for the that present and past hunter-gatherers are constantly most part, are not overlooked, although the interpret- engaged in establishing and maintaining social rela- ation suggested for their presence is usually limited tions between human group members and other- to a general statement, considering possible aesthetic than-human persons (Betts et al. 2015; Bird-David 282 Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.40.40, on 01 Oct 2021 at 14:35:33, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774320000359 Beyond Tools and Function 1999; Hill 2011; Naveh & Bird-David 2014; Viveiros other-than-human persons. Engaging and forming de Castro 1998), designated to ensure that current reciprocal relations such as these is considered to ways of life will be sustained (Barkai 2019; Tanner be vital, and it is practised in everyday life by all per- 1979). Beyond the functional aspect, producing and sons of the group (Harrison-Buck & Hendon 2018). using tools is one way to maintain relations between Hill (2011) suggests that prehistoric hunters in the the different elements of the world, as they reflect Arctic treated animals as agential persons, involved perceptions transmitted over generations regarding in social practices intended to facilitate hunting suc- the relations of humans with other-than-human per- cess and avoid offending prey. Their thoughts and sons. Tools are also active agents, means
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Earliest African Evidence of Carcass Processing and Consumption In
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Earliest African evidence of carcass processing and consumption in cave at 700 ka, Casablanca, Morocco Camille Daujeard1*, Christophe Falguères1, Qingfeng Shao2, Denis Geraads3,4, Jean-Jacques Hublin4,5, David Lefèvre6, Mohssine El Graoui7, Mathieu Rué 6,8, Rosalia Gallotti6,9, Vincent Delvigne9,10, Alain Quefelec 9, Eslem Ben Arous 1, Olivier Tombret1, Abderrahim Mohib7,11 & Jean-Paul Raynal9,4 To date, in Africa, evidence for animal processing and consumption in caves routinely used as living spaces is only documented in the late Middle Pleistocene of the North and South of the continent and postdates the Middle Pleistocene in East Africa. Here we report the earliest evidence in a North-African cave (Grotte des Rhinocéros at Casablanca, Morocco) of cut, percussion and human gnawing marks on faunal remains directly associated with lithic knapping activities in the same space and in a well- documented stratifed context. Ages for this Acheulean site are provided by the dating of herbivorous teeth to 690–720 ka and 520–550 ka (lower and upper sets) by combined Electron Spin Resonance (ESR) and U-series techniques. Traces of butchery on gazelle, alcelaphin, and zebra bones demonstrate that hominins had primary access to herbivore carcasses. Hominins brought and consumed meat in the cave, as documented by herbivore bones bearing human tooth marks concentrated in a circumscribed area of the excavation. In Africa, this site provides the earliest evidence for in situ carcass processing and meat- eating in cave, directly associated with lithic production and demonstrates the recurrent use by early Middle Pleistocene hominins of a North African cave site 400 000 years before that by Homo sapiens at Jebel Irhoud (Morocco).
    [Show full text]
  • Oldowan: Rather More Than Smashing Stones Oldowan: Rather More Than Smashing Stones Oldowan
    TREBALLS D’ARQUEOLOGIA, 9 Centre d’Estudis del Patrimoni Arqueològic de la Prehistòria Oldowan: Rather more than smashing stones Oldowan: Rather more than smashing stones Oldowan: First Hominid Technology Workshop Bellaterra, December 2001 Treballs d'Arqueologia, 9 d'Arqueologia, Treballs Jorge Martínez Moreno Rafael Mora Torcal Ignacio de la Torre Sainz Editores portada 12/12/03 15:56 Página 1 Centre d’Estudis del Patrimoni Arqueològic de la Prehistòria TREBALLS D’ARQUEOLOGIA, 9 Oldowan: Rather more than smashing stones First Hominid Technology Workshop Bellaterra, December 2001 Jorge Martínez Moreno Rafael Mora Torcal Ignacio de la Torre Sainz Editores Bellaterra, desembre de 2003 portada 12/12/03 15:56 Página 2 Comitè organitzador Rafael Mora Torcal Paloma González Marcén Jorge Martínez Moreno Ignacio de la Torre Sainz Joel Casanovas Martí Jezabel Pizarro Barberà Comitè científic assessor Pablo Arias. Universidad de Cantabria Felipe Criado. CSIC Carlos Díez de Lomana. Universidad de Burgos Manuel Domínguez-Rodrigo. Universidad Complutense de Madrid Diane Gifford-González. University of California, Santa Cruz Ramiro March. CNRS José Ramos. Universidad de Cádiz Narcís Soler. Universitat de Girona Valentín Villaverde. Universidad de Valencia Coordinació i edició Centre d’Estudis del Patrimoni Arqueològic de la Prehistòria Departament d’Antropologia Social i de Prehistòria Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona Maquetació Cristina Masvidal Jorge Martínez Moreno Amb el suport de: Ministeri de Ciència i Tecnologia Ministeri d’Educació, Cultura i Esport Departament d’Universitats, Recerca i Societat de la Informació Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona Intercanvi i subscripcions: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona Secció d’Intercanvi de Publicacions Edifici A 08193 Bellaterra. Spain Impressió Servei de Publicacions de la Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona ISSN: 1134-9263 Dipòsit legal: B.
    [Show full text]
  • Paper Series N° 33
    33 World Heritage papers Human origin sites and the Heritage World in Africa Convention 33 World Heritage papers HEADWORLD HERITAGES 2 Human origin sites and the World Heritage Convention in Africa For more information contact: UNESCO World Heritage Centre papers 7, place Fontenoy 75352 Paris 07 SP France Tel: 33 (0)1 45 68 18 76 Fax: 33 (0)1 45 68 55 70 E-mail: [email protected] http://whc.unesco.org World HeritageWorld Human origin sites and the World Heritage Convention in Africa Nuria Sanz, Editor Coordinator of the World Heritage/HEADS Programme Table of Contents Published in 2012 by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization Foreword Page 6 7, place de Fontenoy, 75352 Paris 07 SP, France Kishore Rao, Director, UNESCO World Heritage Centre © UNESCO 2012 Foreword Page 7 All rights reserved H.E. Amin Abdulkadir, Minister, Ministry of Culture and Tourism Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia ISBN 978-92-3-001081-2 Introduction Page 8 Original title: Human origin sites and the World Heritage Convention in Africa Published in 2012 by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization Coordination of the HEADS Programme, UNESCO World Heritage Centre The designations employed and the presentation of material throughout this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNESCO concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Outstanding Universal Value of human evolution in Africa Page 13 Yves Coppens The ideas and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors; they are not necessarily those of UNESCO and do not commit the Organization.
    [Show full text]
  • Stratigraphic, Chronological and Behavioural Contexts of Pleistocene
    letters to nature shows that modern human morphology emerged in Africa Acknowledgements We thank A. Almquist, A. Asfaw, M. Asnake, T. Assebework, D. Brill, long before the Neanderthals vanished from Eurasia. A J. D. Clark, J. DeHeinzelin, A. Getty, Y. Haile-Selassie, B. Latimer, C. Pehlevan, K. Schick, S. Simpson, P.Snow and Y. Zeleka for fieldwork and analytical studies; J. L. Arsuaga, A. Gracia and N. Garcia for comparative metric data; C. O. Lovejoy for review; and F. Bibi, D. Brill, R. Cann, Methods Y. Haile-Selassie, L. Hlusko, L. Jellema, R. Klein, J. Matternes and R. Paul for assistance. We thank Order Primates L., 1758 the Ministry of Youth, Sports and Culture, the Authority for Research and Conservation of the Suborder Anthropoidea Mivart, 1864 Cultural Heritage, and the National Museum of Ethiopia for permissions; the Afar Regional Superfamily Hominoidea Gray, 1825 Government and the Afar people of the Middle Awash, particularly the Bouri–Modaitu Family Hominidae Gray, 1825 community and H. Elema; and many other individuals for contributing to our efforts. This Homo sapiens idaltu subsp. nov. research was supported by the NSF (US) and the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science. Etymology. The subspecies name ‘ida`ltu’ is taken from the Afar language. It means ‘elder’. Competing interests statement The authors declare that they have no competing financial Holotype. BOU-VP-16/1 (Fig. 1), an adult cranium with partial dentition. Holotype and interests. referred material are housed at the National Museum of Ethiopia, Addis Ababa. Holotype from Bouri Vertebrate Paleontology Locality 16 (BOU-VP 16); differentially corrected Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to T.W.
    [Show full text]
  • From 1.5 to 0.85 Ma at Melka Kunture (Upper Awash, Ethiopian Highlands)
    doie-pub 10.4436/jass.95001 ahead of print JASs Reports doi: 10.4436/jass.89003 Journal of Anthropological Sciences Vol. 95 (2017), pp. 137-181 Two Acheuleans, two humankinds: From 1.5 to 0.85 Ma at Melka Kunture (Upper Awash, Ethiopian highlands) Rosalia Gallotti1,2,3 & Margherita Mussi1,2 1) Dipartimento di Scienze dell’Antichità, Sapienza Università di Roma, Via dei Volsci 122, 00185 Rome, Italy e-mail: [email protected] 2) Missione archeologica italiana a Melka Kunture e Balchit 3) Université Bordeaux, UMR 5199 PACEA-PPP, Bâtiment B18 allée Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire, CS 50023 F - 33615 PESSAC CEDEX, France Summary - The Acheulean is the longest-lasting human cultural record, spanning approximately 1.5 Ma and three continents. The most comprehensive sequences are found in East Africa, where, in large- scale syntheses, the Lower Pleistocene Acheulean (LPA) has often been considered a uniform cultural entity. Furthermore, the emergence and development of Acheulean technology are seen as linked to the emergence and evolution of Homo ergaster/erectus. The criterion for grouping together different lithic assemblages scattered over space and time is the presence of large cutting tools (LCTs), more than of any other component. Their degree of refinement has been used, in turn, as a parameter for evaluating Acheulean development and variability. But was the East African LPA really uniform as regards all components involved in lithic productions? The aim of this paper is to evaluate the techno-economic similarities and differences among LPA productions in a specific micro-regional and environmental context, i.e. at Melka Kunture, in the Ethiopian highlands, and in a specific period of time: between ~1.5 Ma, when some of the earliest Acheulean complexes appeared, and 1.0-0.85 Ma, when LCTs productions became intensive and widespread.
    [Show full text]
  • The Prehistory of Melka Kunture \(Ethiopia\)*
    Bulletin du Centre de recherche français à Jérusalem 8 | 2001 Varia The prehistory of Melka Kunture (Ethiopia) Marcello Piperno Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/bcrfj/1992 ISSN: 2075-5287 Publisher Centre de recherche français de Jérusalem Printed version Date of publication: 30 March 2001 Number of pages: 135-145 Electronic reference Marcello Piperno, « The prehistory of Melka Kunture (Ethiopia) », Bulletin du Centre de recherche français à Jérusalem [Online], 8 | 2001, Online since 11 March 2008, connection on 04 May 2019. URL : http:// journals.openedition.org/bcrfj/1992 © Bulletin du Centre de recherche français à Jérusalem Bulletin du CRFJ, printemps 2001, numéro 8 The prehistory of Melka Kunture (Ethiopia)* 1. A brief history of discoveries and researches The site of Melka Kunture was discovered and proposed to the attention of the Ethiopian Archaeological Service for the first time in 1963 by G. Dekker. The same year a French prehistorian archaeologist, G. Bailloud, carried out the first surface surveys and collected important lithic materials and faunal remains. Since 1965, a French-Ethiopian mission directed by Jean Chavaillon faced to the systematic investigation of the Paleolithic site through intensive excavations in some of the archaeological levels, together with the surveys of the large area occupied by prehistoric finds, the definition of the chronostratigraphy of Lower and Middle Pleistocene sediments and the study of the Uthical and faunal occurrences insofar put to light. An interruption of field activities took place after the 1982 excavation campaign; in the following years, the study of a great part of archaeological materials discovered during extensive excavations and stored in the Melka Kunture Laboratory in Addis Abeba was nearly accomplished.
    [Show full text]
  • The Unknown Oldowan: ~1.7-Million-Year-Old Standardized Obsidian Small Tools from Garba IV, Melka Kunture, Ethiopia
    RESEARCH ARTICLE The Unknown Oldowan: ~1.7-Million-Year-Old Standardized Obsidian Small Tools from Garba IV, Melka Kunture, Ethiopia Rosalia Gallotti1,2,3☯*, Margherita Mussi1,2☯ 1 Dipartimento di Scienze dell'Antichità, Università di Roma "La Sapienza", Via dei Volsci 122, 00185 Rome, Italy, 2 Italian Archaeological Mission at Melka Kunture and Balchit, Rome, Italy, 3 Université Bordeaux 1 –UMR5199 PACEA-PPP, Bâtiment B18 allée Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire CS 50023 F—33615 PESSAC CEDEX, France ☯ These authors contributed equally to this work. * [email protected] Abstract The Oldowan Industrial Complex has long been thought to have been static, with limited internal variability, embracing techno-complexes essentially focused on small-to-medium flake production. The flakes were rarely modified by retouch to produce small tools, which do not show any standardized pattern. Usually, the manufacture of small standardized tools OPEN ACCESS has been interpreted as a more complex behavior emerging with the Acheulean technology. Citation: Gallotti R, Mussi M (2015) The Unknown Here we report on the ~1.7 Ma Oldowan assemblages from Garba IVE-F at Melka Kunture Oldowan: ~1.7-Million-Year-Old Standardized Obsidian Small Tools from Garba IV, Melka Kunture, in the Ethiopian highland. This industry is structured by technical criteria shared by the other Ethiopia. PLoS ONE 10(12): e0145101. doi:10.1371/ East African Oldowan assemblages. However, there is also evidence of a specific technical journal.pone.0145101 process never recorded before, i.e. the systematic production of standardized small pointed Editor: Nuno Bicho, Universidade do Algarve, tools strictly linked to the obsidian exploitation.
    [Show full text]
  • Dedicated Core-On-Anvil Production of Bladelet-Like Flakes in The
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Dedicated core-on-anvil production of bladelet-like fakes in the Acheulean at Thomas Quarry I - L1 (Casablanca, Morocco) Rosalia Gallotti1,2 ✉ , Abderrahim Mohib3, Paul Fernandes2,4, Mohssine El Graoui5, David Lefèvre1 & Jean-Paul Raynal2,6 The ability to produce large cutting tools (LCTs) is considered as the technological marker of the Acheulean and the indicator of a greater technological complexity compared to the previous Oldowan. Although Acheulean techno-complexes are also composed of a concurrent core-and-fake technology, the iconic handaxes have attracted more attention than any other lithic component. Consequently, little is known of the small and medium-sized fake productions (small faking), especially starting from 1 Ma, when handaxe and cleaver manufacture becomes intensive and widespread across Africa, including the Atlantic coastal regions of Morocco. Research at Thomas Quarry I yielded a rich early Acheulean lithic assemblage, mainly composed of quartzite LCTs and small faking, together with a small-sized fint production. Here, we report a particular aspect of this fint assemblage, i.e. a fint bladelet-like fake production. This process represents a discrete technical behaviour among those related to small faking both in quartzite and fint: pebbles were faked using the bipolar-on-anvil technique repeatedly employing a specifc method to produce bladelet-like fakes. This production represents the oldest dated occurrence of bladelet-like technology in Africa and reveals technical competencies hitherto unknown for these periods, providing further elements for the techno-economic diversifcation of the African Acheulean. Large shaped tools (length or width ≥ 10 cm), made on large fakes, cobbles, or tabular clast blanks, are the hall- mark of the African Acheulean from its emergence at ~1.8 Ma and for the subsequent 1.5 million years1–22.
    [Show full text]