DOCSLIB.ORG

Solar Flares, Current Sheets, and Other Things

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Solar Flares, Current Sheets, and Other Things Solar flares, current sheets, and finite-time singularities in magnetohydrodynamics Yuri Litvinenko Department of Mathematics, University of Waikato, New Zealand Flares and FTS – p.1/44 Flares and FTS – p.2/44 Outline Solar flares: observations and theories Reconnecting current sheets: basic properties Self-similar solutions for current sheet formation in 2D magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) and Hall MHD Finite-time singularities in Hall MHD Flares and FTS – p.3/44 GOES X-ray image of a solar flare (9/9/2005) Flares and FTS – p.4/44 TRACE close-up of the same flare Flares and FTS – p.5/44 The flaring solar corona (Yohkoh X-ray image) Flares and FTS – p.6/44 SDO EUV image of an eruption (31/08/2012) Flares and FTS – p.7/44 Why study solar flares? 1. Solar flares have a direct effect on the Earth. Energetic particles, accelerated in solar flares, are dangerous to astronauts and to electronic instruments in space. The atmosphere expands due to heating by the flare radiation, increasing the drag on the satellites orbiting around the Earth. Plasma density variations in the ionosphere can impact high-frequency radio communication and GPS navigation systems. Power grid vulnerability, pipeline corrosion, ... 2. Flare-like energy release processes take place on other stars and in accretion disks. Flares and FTS – p.8/44 Energy release in flares Flare: impulsive release of magnetic energy as radiation, heat, fast flows and particles in the lower corona of the Sun. Total flare energy up to 1032 erg: E ≃ B2 B = 100 G, L = 1010 cm = L3 ⇒ 8π ≥ E Flare time t 103 s: f ≃ L B tf 100 tA, tA = , vA = ≤ vA √4πρ Flares and FTS – p.9/44 Resistive energy release rate L W = I2R = I2 η S I BL, S L2 = W η ∼ ≃ ⇒ ∼ Problem: η T −3/2 = W is too small. ∼ ⇒ Solution: flatten I into a sheet. η l L, S lL = W ≪ ≃ ⇒ ∼ l The famous Sweet–Parker (1957) scaling: l W η1/2 ∼ ∼ Flares and FTS – p.10/44 Reconnecting current sheet Flares and FTS – p.11/44 Solar flare geometry (Sturrock, 1968) Flares and FTS – p.12/44 Observational evidence for reconnection (McKenzie, 2001) Flares and FTS – p.13/44 RHESSI X-ray images of a current sheet (Sui and Holman, 2003) Flares and FTS – p.14/44 Flare geometry in three dimensions (Machado et al., 1983) Flares and FTS – p.15/44 Hugh Hudson’s archive of flare cartoons Flares and FTS – p.16/44 More flare cartoons Flares and FTS – p.17/44 Even more ... Flares and FTS – p.18/44 A recent flare cartoon (Janvier, 2014) Flares and FTS – p.19/44 Current sheet formation at a neutral line Flares and FTS – p.20/44 Parameters of a solar active region Typical values: L = 109.5 cm, T = 106 K, ρ = 10−15 g cm−3, B B = 102 G, v = 109 cm s−1 A √4πρ ≃ Dimensionless resistivity: c2 η = 10−14.5 4πvALσ ≃ Dimensionless ion inertial length: c −6.5 1/2 di = 10 >η Lωpi ≃ Flares and FTS – p.21/44 Dimensionless equations of Hall MHD Momentum equation: ∂ v +(v )v = p + J B t · ∇ −∇ × Ohm’s law: E + v B = d (J B p ) × i × − ∇ e Incompressibility: v = 0 ∇ · Maxwell’s equations: E = ∂ B, B = 0, J = B ∇× − t ∇ · ∇× Flares and FTS – p.22/44 21 2D Hall MHD solution v(x,y,t) = φ zˆ + W zˆ ∇ × B(x,y,t) = ψ zˆ + Zzˆ ∇ × Planar components: ∂ ( 2φ) + [ 2φ,φ] = [ 2ψ,ψ] t ∇ ∇ ∇ ∂tψ + [ψ,φ] = di[ψ, Z] Axial components: ∂tW + [W, φ] = [Z,ψ] ∂ Z + [Z,φ] = [W, ψ] + d [ 2ψ,ψ] t i ∇ Flares and FTS – p.23/44 A self-similar solution Stream function: φ = γ(t)xy − Flux function: ψ = α(t)x2 β(t)y2 − Axial speed: W = f(t)x2 + g(t)y2 Axial magnetic field: Z = h(t)xy Flares and FTS – p.24/44 v and B at t = 0 Flares and FTS – p.25/44 Reconnection in a resistive viscous plasma η = 0, ν = 0 = 6 6 ⇒ ψ ψ + 2η (α β)dt → − Z W W + 2ν (f + g)dt → Z Flares and FTS – p.26/44 The similarity reduction (a system of ODEs) α˙ 2αγ 2d αh = 0 − − i β˙ + 2βγ + 2diβh = 0 f˙ 2γf + 2αh = 0 − g˙ + 2γg + 2βh = 0 h˙ + 4αg + 4βf = 0 Flares and FTS – p.27/44 Current sheet formation in 2D MHD di = 0 f = g = h = 0, γ = γ0 α˙ 2αγ0 = 0 − β˙ + 2βγ0 = 0 Exponential growth, no finite-time singularities (FTS): α(t) = exp(2γ0t) β(t) = exp( 2γ0t) − (Chapman and Kendall, 1963; Sulem et al., 1985; Grauer and Marliani, 1998) Flares and FTS – p.28/44 The simplest model of a finite-time singularity 1D fluid flow, v = v(x, t): ∂tv + v∂xv = 0 v = ω(t)x ω˙ + ω2 = 0 ω0 ω(t) = 1 + ω0t FTS: ω0 < 0 = ω(t) as t 1/ ω0 ⇒ →∞ → | | Flares and FTS – p.29/44 Effect of the Hall term on the magnetic field di > 0 t 1: ≪ α(t) 1+(2γ0 + 2d h0)t ≈ i β(t) 1 (2γ0 + 2d h0)t ≈ − i The angle between the magnetic separatrices, ψ = 0: 1 2 θ β / tan = 1 (2γ0 + 2d h0)t 2 α ≈ − i Flares and FTS – p.30/44 4 Collapse to a current sheet: dih0 = +10− ln Α 15 12.5 10 7.5 5 2.5 t 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 α(0) = β(0) = 1, γ(0) = γ0, f(0) = g(0) = 0 Flares and FTS – p.31/44 4 Collapse to a current sheet: dih0 = +10− ln Β t -2 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 -4 -6 -8 -10 -12 -14 α(0) = β(0) = 1, γ(0) = γ0, f(0) = g(0) = 0 Flares and FTS – p.32/44 4 Collapse to a current sheet: dih0 = +10− lnHh diL 15 10 5 t 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 -5 α(0) = β(0) = 1, γ(0) = γ0, f(0) = g(0) = 0 Flares and FTS – p.33/44 4 Collapse to a current sheet: d h = 10− i 0 − ln Α 3 2 1 t 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 -1 -2 α(0) = β(0) = 1, γ(0) = γ0, f(0) = g(0) = 0 Flares and FTS – p.34/44 4 Collapse to a current sheet: d h = 10− i 0 − ln Β 3 2 1 t 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 -1 -2 -3 α(0) = β(0) = 1, γ(0) = γ0, f(0) = g(0) = 0 Flares and FTS – p.35/44 Finite-time singularity: a mechanical analogy FTS: h(t) as t t →∞ → s h¨ + U ′(h) = 0 1 2 4 2 2 1 2 4 2 2 2 U(h) = (d h + a h ) + (d h0 + a h0) 8(α0g0 + β0f0) −2 i 2 i − 2 2 2 a = 2[4d (α0g0 β0f0) 8α0β0 + d h0] − i − − i Flares and FTS – p.36/44 Finite-time singularity: a mechanical analogy Flares and FTS – p.37/44 Criterion for the FTS absence α0β0(α0 + d f0)(β0 d g0) 0 i − i ≥ d (α0g0 β0f0) 2α0β0 0 i − − ≥ (Litvinenko and McMahon, 2014) Flares and FTS – p.38/44 Behaviour near the singularity (h> 0) t ′ ′ τ =(ts t) 0, Γ = γ(t )dt Γs − → 0 → Z 1 −2 α exp(2Γs)τ ≈ 4(β0 d g0) − i 2 β 4α0β0(β0 d g0)exp( 2Γ )τ ≈ − i − s 1 −2 dif exp(2Γs)τ ≈−4(β0 d g0) − i d g (β0 d g0)exp( 2Γ ) i ≈− − i − s d h τ −1 i ≈ Flares and FTS – p.39/44 An intermediate asymptotic solution h˙ 0 h(t) h0 cosh(at) + sinh(at) ≈ a ! × 2 −1 2 ˙ di h0 1 2 h0 + exp(2at) − 16a a ! Singularity time, h(t ) = : s ∞ −2 2 1 16a h˙ 0 ts = ln 2 h0 + 2a di a ! Flares and FTS – p.40/44 Homework problem Find an exact solution for h(t) in terms of Jacobi elliptic functions. Flares and FTS – p.41/44 Solar flares as finite-time singularities? Flares and FTS – p.42/44 An estimate for the solar flare onset time L = 109.5 cm, T = 106 K, n = 109 cm−3, 2 B 9 −1 B = 10 G, vA = 10 cm s 4πmpn ≃ p c −6.5 di = 10 Lωpi ≃ L 1 a h0 1 = ts ln 30 s ≃ ≃ ⇒ ≃ vA di ≃ Flares and FTS – p.43/44 Summary Observational data and theoretical models strongly suggest that reconnecting current sheets, separating the interacting magnetic fluxes in the solar atmosphere, play the key role in the dynamics and energetics of solar flares. The current sheet formation can be modelled as the development of a singularity in the solution for the electric current density at a magnetic neutral line. A finite-time collapse to the current sheet can occur in a weakly collisional plasma, described by Hall magnetohydrodynamics. Predictions made using the exact self-similar solutions may have important implications for magnetic reconnection in the laboratory and space plasmas. Flares and FTS – p.44/44.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1 Solar Wind at 33 AU: Setting Bounds on the Pluto Interaction For
    Solar Wind at 33 AU: Setting Bounds on the Pluto Interaction for New Horizons F. Bagenal1, P.A. Delamere2, H. A. Elliott3, M.E. Hill4, C.M. Lisse4, D.J. McComas3,7, R.L McNutt, Jr.4, J.D. Richardson5, C.W. Smith6, D.F. Strobel8 1 University of Colorado, Boulder CO 2 University of Alaska, Fairbanks AK 3 Southwest Research Institute, San Antonio TX 4 ApplieD Physics Laboratory, The Johns Hopkins University, Laurel MD 5 Massachusetts Institute of Technology, CambriDge MA 6 University of New Hampshire, Durham NH 7 University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio TX 8 The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore MD CorresponDing author information: Fran Bagenal Professor of Astrophysical and Planetary Sciences Laboratory for Atmospheric anD Space Physics UCB 600 University of Colorado 3665 Discovery Drive Boulder CO 80303 Tel. 303 492 2598 [email protected] Abstract NASA’s New Horizons spacecraft flies past Pluto on July 14, 2015, carrying two instruments that Detect chargeD particles. Pluto has a tenuous, extenDeD atmosphere that is escaping the planet’s weak gravity. The interaction of the solar wind with Pluto’s escaping atmosphere depends on solar wind conditions as well as the vertical structure of Pluto’s atmosphere. We have analyzeD Voyager 2 particles anD fielDs measurements between 25 anD 39 AU anD present their statistical variations. We have adjusted these predictions to allow for the Sun’s declining activity and solar wind output. We summarize the range of SW conDitions that can be expecteD at 33 AU anD survey the range of scales of interaction that New Horizons might experience.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of Tearing Instability in a Current Sheet Forming by Sheared Incompressible Flow
    Development of tearing instability in a current sheet forming by sheared incompressible flow The MIT Faculty has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters. Citation Tolman, Elizabeth A., Nuno F. Loureiro, and Dmitri A. Uzdensky. “Development of Tearing Instability in a Current Sheet Forming by Sheared Incompressible Flow.” Journal of Plasma Physics 84, no. 01 (February 2018). As Published http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S002237781800017X Publisher Cambridge University Press Version Author's final manuscript Citable link http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/117098 Terms of Use Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike Detailed Terms http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Under consideration for publication in J. Plasma Phys. 1 Development of Tearing Instability in a Current Sheet Forming by Sheared Incompressible Flow Elizabeth A. Tolman1 , Nuno F. Loureiro1 and Dmitri A. Uzdensky2,3 † 1Plasma Science and Fusion Center, Massachus etts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA 2Center for Integrated Plasma Studies, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309, USA 3Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA (Received xx; revised xx; accepted xx) Sweet-Parker current sheets in high Lundquist number plasmas are unstable to tearing, suggesting they will not form in physical systems. Understanding magnetic reconnection thus requires study of the stability of a current sheet as it forms. Formation can occur due to sheared, sub-Alfv´enic incompressible flows which narrow the sheet. Standard tearing theory (Furth et al. 1963; Coppi et al. 1976; Rutherford 1973) is not immediately appli- cable to such forming sheets for two reasons: first, because the flow introduces terms not present in the standard calculation; second, because the changing equilibrium introduces time dependence to terms which are constant in the standard calculation, complicating the formulation of an eigenvalue problem.
    [Show full text]
  • Physics of Stellar Coronae
    Physics of Stellar Coronae Manuel G¨udel Paul Scherrer Institut, W¨urenlingen and Villigen, CH-5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland [email protected] 1 Introduction For the plasma physicist, the solar corona offers an outstanding example of a space plasma, and surely one that deserves a lifetime of study. Not only can we observe the solar corona on scales of a few hundred kilometers and monitor its changes in the course of seconds to minutes, we also have a wide range of detailed diagnostics at our disposal that provide immediate access to the prevalent physical processes. Yet, solar physics offers a rich field of unsolved plasma-physical problems. How is the coronal plasma continuously heated to > 106 K? How and where are high-energy particles episodically accelerated? What is the internal dy- namics of plasma in magnetic loops? What is the initial trigger of a coronal flare? How does the corona link to the solar wind, and how and where is the latter accelerated? How is plasma transported into the solar corona? Why, then, study stellar coronae that remain spatially unresolved in X- rays and are only marginally resolved at radio wavelengths, objects that require exposure times of several hours before approximate measurements of the ensemble of plasma structures can be obtained? There are many reasons. In the context of the solar-stellar connection, stellar X-ray astronomy has introduced a range of stellar rotation periods, gravities, masses, and ages into the debate on the magnetic dynamo. Coronal magnetic structures and heating mechanisms may vary together with varia- tions of these parameters.
    [Show full text]
  • Coronal Heating and Nanoflares: Current Sheet Formation and Heating
    A&A 560, A89 (2013) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201116652 & c ESO 2013 Astrophysics Coronal heating and nanoflares: current sheet formation and heating R. Bowness, A. W. Hood, and C. E. Parnell School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of St Andrews, North Haugh, St Andrews, Fife, KY16 9SS, UK e-mail: [email protected] Received 4 February 2011 / Accepted 14 November 2013 ABSTRACT Aims. Solar photospheric footpoint motions can produce strong, localised currents in the corona. A detailed understanding of the formation process and the resulting heating is important in modelling nanoflares, as a mechanism for heating the solar corona. Methods. A 3D MHD simulation is described in which an initially straight magnetic field is sheared in two directions. Grid resolutions up to 5123 were used and two boundary drivers were considered; one where the boundaries are continuously driven and one where the driving is switched off once a current layer is formed. Results. For both drivers a twisted current layer is formed. After a long time we see that, when the boundary driving has been switched off, the system relaxes towards a lower energy equilibrium. For the driver which continuously shears the magnetic field we see a repeating cycle of strong current structures forming, fragmenting and decreasing in magnitude and then building up again. Realistic coronal temperatures are obtained. Key words. magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) – magnetic reconnection – Sun: corona 1. Introduction It is well known that current layers can form at null points in both two dimensions (e.g. Green 1965; Syrovatskiˇı The Sun’s corona is much hotter than its visible surface: the pho- 1971; Bungey & Priest 1995; Craig & Litvinenko 2005; tosphere’s average temperature is 6000 K compared to over a Fuentes-Fernández et al.
    [Show full text]
  • MHD Simulation of the Three-Dimensional Structure of the Heliospheric Current Sheet
    A&A 376, 288–291 (2001) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20010881 & c ESO 2001 Astrophysics MHD simulation of the three-dimensional structure of the heliospheric current sheet P. L. Israelevich1,T.I.Gombosi2,A.I.Ershkovich1,K.C.Hansen2,C.P.T.Groth2, D. L. DeZeeuw2, andK.G.Powell3 1 Department of Geophysics and Planetary Sciences, Raymond and Beverly Sackler Faculty of Exact Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, 69978 Tel Aviv, Israel 2 Space Physics Research Laboratory, Department of Atmospheric, Oceanic and Space Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA 3 Department of Aerospace Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA Received 18 April 2001 / Accepted 15 June 2001 Abstract. The existence of the radial component of the electric current flowing toward the Sun is revealed in numerical simulation. The total strength of the radial current is ∼3 × 109 A. The only way to fulfil the electric current continuity is to close the radial electric current by means of field- aligned currents at the polar region of the Sun. Thus, the surface density of the closure current flowing along the solar surface can be estimated as ∼4 A/m, and the magnetic field produced by this current is B ∼ 5 × 10−6 T, i.e. several percent of the intrinsic magnetic field of the Sun. This seems to mean that any treatment of the solar magnetic field generation should take into account the heliospheric current circuit as well as the currents flowing inside the Sun. Key words. solar wind – Sun: magnetic fields 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Nanoflares Heating of Solar Corona by Reconnection Model
    NANOFLARES HEATING OF SOLAR CORONA BY RECONNECTION MODEL VINOD KUMAR JOSHI1, LALAN PRASAD2 1Department of Electronics and Communication, Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal-576104, India E-mail: [email protected] 2Department of Physics, M. B. Govt. P. G. College, Haldwani-263139, India E-mail: [email protected] Abstract. Abstract. A number of mechanisms have been proposed that predicts heating by discrete events of various energies. By taking the facts that when two oppositely di- rected magnetic fields come closer to form a current sheet (treated as diffusion region), the current density of plasma increases due to which magnetic reconnection and turbu- lence takes place. We investigate the energy range 1023 to 1026 ergs (called nanoflares), by steady state of magnetic reconnection. Here the magnetic energy convert in to the thermal energy and heating exist by the process of reconnection model. This process is also the principle source of heat for solar X-ray corona. We reported that the energy release in current sheet also matches with the observations of Yohkoh satellite. From Yohkoh X-ray observations the fluctuation in brightness is of the order of 1023 – 1026 ergs over times of 100 sec. Key words: Sun, Solar corona, Magnetic reconnection, Coronal heating, Solar flares. 1. INTRODUCTION The enigma of coronal heating represents one of the most challenging problems in Astrophysics at present time. The Sun’s outer atmosphere (solar corona) contains a highly ionized atoms that can only form at a temperature of millions degree. While the underlying region photosphere (temperature 4500K–6000K) and chromospheres (temperature 4500K–10000K) are much cooler.
    [Show full text]
  • Modeling a Carrington-Scale Stellar Superflare and Coronal Mass
    The Astrophysical Journal, 880:97 (12pp), 2019 August 1 https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab287e © 2019. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. Modeling a Carrington-scale Stellar Superflare and Coronal Mass Ejection from k1Cet Benjamin J. Lynch1 , Vladimir S. Airapetian2,3 , C. Richard DeVore2 , Maria D. Kazachenko4 , Teresa Lüftinger5, Oleg Kochukhov6 , Lisa Rosén6, and William P. Abbett1 1 Space Sciences Laboratory, University of California–Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA; [email protected] 2 NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA 3 Department of Physics, American University, Washington, D.C. 20016, USA 4 Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80303, USA 5 Department of Astrophysics, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria 6 Department of Physics and Astronomy, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden Received 2019 April 9; revised 2019 June 3; accepted 2019 June 7; published 2019 July 30 Abstract Observations from the Kepler mission have revealed frequent superflares on young and active solar-like stars. Superflares result from the large-scale restructuring of stellar magnetic fields, and are associated with the eruption of coronal material (a coronal mass ejection, or CME) and energy release that can be orders of magnitude greater than those observed in the largest solar flares. These catastrophic events, if frequent, can significantly impact the potential habitability of terrestrial exoplanets through atmospheric erosion or intense radiation exposure at the
    [Show full text]
  • In Situ Analysis of Heliospheric Current Sheet Propagation 10.1002/2017JA024194 Jun Peng1,2 , Yong C.-M
    PUBLICATIONS Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics RESEARCH ARTICLE In Situ Analysis of Heliospheric Current Sheet Propagation 10.1002/2017JA024194 Jun Peng1,2 , Yong C.-M. Liu1 , Jia Huang1,2 , Hui Li1 , Berndt Klecker3 , 4 5 4 6,7 8 Key Points: Antoinette B. Galvin , Kristin Simunac , Charles Farrugia , L. K. Jian , Yang Liu , 9 • Latitudinal effect is important for the and Jie Zhang heliospheric current sheet (HCS) propagation 1State Key Laboratory of Space Weather, National Space Science Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China, • Latitudinal effect is significant when a 2College of Earth Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China, 3Max-Planck-Institut für HCS has a small inclination angle 4 • Extraterrestrische Physik, Garching, Germany, Institute for the Study of Earth Oceans and Space, University of New The HCS inclination angle is better 5 determined using the observation Hampshire, Durham, NH, USA, Department of Natural Science, St. Petersburg College, Tarpon Springs, FL, USA, 6 7 at 1 AU Department of Astronomy, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA, Heliophysics Science Division, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA, 8W. W. Hansen Experimental Physics Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA, 9Department of Physics and Astronomy, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA Correspondence to: Y. C.-M. Liu, Abstract The heliospheric current sheet (HCS) is an important structure not only for understanding the [email protected] physics of interplanetary space but also for space weather prediction. We investigate the differences of the HCS arrival time between three spacecraft separated in heliolongitude, heliolatitude and radial distance from Citation: the Sun (STEREO A, STEREO B, and ACE) to understand the key factors controlling the HCS propagation.
    [Show full text]
  • Current Sheets from Ulysses Observation
    Ann. Geophys., 29, 237–249, 2011 www.ann-geophys.net/29/237/2011/ Annales doi:10.5194/angeo-29-237-2011 Geophysicae © Author(s) 2011. CC Attribution 3.0 License. Current sheets from Ulysses observation B. Miao1,3, B. Peng2, and G. Li1,2 1CSPAR, University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, AL 35805, USA 2Department of Physics, University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, AL 35805, USA 3CAS Key Laboratory of Basic Plasma Physics, School of Earth and Space Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui 230026, China Received: 1 October 2010 – Revised: 5 January 2011 – Accepted: 25 January 2011 – Published: 2 February 2011 Abstract. Current sheet is a significant source of solar wind very difficult. In particular, studying the dynamical evo- MHD turbulence intermittency. It has long been recognized lution of MHD turbulence in terrestrial laboratory experi- that these structures can arise from non-linear interactions ments is difficult because these experiments are short lived. of MHD turbulence. Alternatively, they may also be relic In comparison, solar wind provides a natural laboratory to structures in the solar wind that have a solar origin, e.g., study MHD turbulence in a collisionless plasma. In partic- magnetic walls of flux tubes that separate solar wind plasma ular, the launches of multiple spacecraft in the past several into distinct parcels. Identifying these structures in the solar decades, noticeably Voyager, Helios, WIND, Ulysses and wind is crucial to understanding the properties of the solar Cluster, have accumulated a significant amount of plasma wind MHD turbulence. Using Ulysses observations we ex- and magnetic field data These data have revealed valuable amine 3-year worth of solar wind magnetic field data when information about MHD turbulence and its dynamical evolu- the Ulysses is at low latitude during solar minimum.
    [Show full text]
  • Modeling Solar Energetic Particle Transport Near a Wavy Heliospheric Current Sheet
    The Astrophysical Journal, 854:23 (14pp), 2018 February 10 https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aaa3fa © 2018. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. Modeling Solar Energetic Particle Transport near a Wavy Heliospheric Current Sheet Markus Battarbee1,3 , Silvia Dalla1 , and Mike S. Marsh2 1 Jeremiah Horrocks Institute, University of Central Lancashire, PR1 2HE, UK; [email protected] 2 Met Office, Exeter, EX1 3 PB, UK Received 2017 November 2; revised 2017 December 11; accepted 2017 December 21; published 2018 February 7 Abstract Understanding the transport of solar energetic particles (SEPs) from acceleration sites at the Sun into interplanetary space and to the Earth is an important question for forecasting space weather. The interplanetary magnetic field (IMF), with two distinct polarities and a complex structure, governs energetic particle transport and drifts. We analyze for the first time the effect of a wavy heliospheric current sheet (HCS) on the propagation of SEPs. We inject protons close to the Sun and propagate them by integrating fully 3D trajectories within the inner heliosphere in the presence of weak scattering. We model the HCS position using fits based on neutral lines of magnetic field source surface maps (SSMs). We map 1 au proton crossings, which show efficient transport in longitude via HCS, depending on the location of the injection region with respect to the HCS. For HCS tilt angles around 30°–40°,wefind significant qualitative differences between A+ and A− configurations of the IMF, with stronger fluences along the HCS in the former case but with a distribution of particles across a wider range of longitudes and latitudes in the latter.
    [Show full text]
  • Heliophysics I
    Collected figures from HELIOPHYSICS I. PLASMA PHYSICS OF THE LOCAL COSMOS edited by CAROLUS J. SCHRIJVER Lockheed Martin Advanced Technology Center and GEORGE L. SISCOE Boston University 3 This document contains the figures from the published volume of Helio- physics I as submitted to Cambridge University Press, prior to possible re- visions in the graphics and captions during the copy editing process. This collection is intended only as an aid to students and teachers for use in, e.g., lectures and study sessions. Contents 1 Prologue page 1 by Carolus J. Schrijver and George L. Siscoe 2 Introduction to heliophysics 6 by Thomas J. Bogdan 3 Creation and destruction of magnetic field 16 by Matthias Rempel 4 Magnetic field topology 23 by Dana W. Longcope 5 Magnetic reconnection 36 by Terry G. Forbes 6 Structures of the magnetic field 50 by Mark B. Moldwin, George L. Siscoe, and Carolus J. Schrijver 7 Turbulence in space plasmas 64 by Charles W. Smith 8 The solar atmosphere 73 by Viggo H. Hansteen 9 Stellar winds and magnetic fields 85 by Viggo H. Hansteen 10 Fundamentals of planetary magnetospheres 97 by Vytenis M. Vasyli¯unas i ii Contents 11 Solar-wind magnetosphere coupling: an MHD perpective107 by Frank R. Toffoletto and George L. Siscoe 12 On the ionosphere and chromosphere 117 by Tim Fuller-Rowell and Carolus J. Schrijver 13 Comparative planetary environments 131 by Fran Bagenal 1 Prologue by Carolus J. Schrijver and George L. Siscoe 1 2 Prologue Fig. 1.1. Temperature versus density for a variety of conditions within the local cos- mos.
    [Show full text]
  • Prevalence of Magnetic Reconnection in the Near-Sun Heliospheric Current Sheet T
    A&A 650, A13 (2021) Astronomy https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202039863 & © T. D. Phan et al. 2021 Astrophysics Parker Solar Probe: Ushering a new frontier in space exploration Special issue Prevalence of magnetic reconnection in the near-Sun heliospheric current sheet T. D. Phan1, B. Lavraud2,3, J. S. Halekas4, M. Øieroset1, J. F. Drake5, J. P. Eastwood6, M. A. Shay7, P. S. Pyakurel1, S. D. Bale1,6,8, D. Larson1, R. Livi1, P. L. Whittlesey1, A. Rahmati1, M. Pulupa1, M. D. McManus1, J. L. Verniero1, J. W. Bonnell1, N. A. Schwadron9, M. Stevens10, A. W. Case10, J. C. Kasper11, R. J. MacDowall12, P. A. Szabo12, A. Koval12,13, K. E. Korreck10, T. Dudok de Wit14, D. Malaspina15, K. Goetz16, and P. R. Harvey1 1 SSL, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA e-mail: [email protected] 2 Laboratoire d'Astrophysique de Bordeaux, Univ. Bordeaux, France 3 IRAP, Université de Toulouse, France 4 University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA 5 University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA 6 The Blackett Laboratory, Imperial College London, London, UK 7 University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA 8 Physics Department, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-7300, USA 9 Department of Physics, University of New Hampshire, NH, USA 10 Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, Cambridge, MA, USA 11 Climate and Space Sciences and Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA 12 NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA 13 University of Maryland Baltimore County, Baltimore, MD, USA 14 LPC2E, CNRS and University of Orléans, Orléans, France 15 LASP, University of Colorado Boulder, Colorado, USA 16 School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA Received 6 November 2020 / Accepted 16 December 2020 ABSTRACT During three of its first five orbits around the Sun, Parker Solar Probe (PSP) crossed the large-scale heliospheric current sheet (HCS) multiple times and provided unprecedented detailed plasma and field observations of the near-Sun HCS.
    [Show full text]