Schubert's Recapitulation Scripts – Part II
CHAPTER 4 CATEGORY 2 RECAPITULATIONS 4.1. Introduction 4.2. Mozart, Monahan, and the Crux 4.3. Beethoven and the Minimally Recomposed Category 2 4.4. Beethoven and Schubert: Labor and Grace 4.5. Repetitions of Single Referential Measures 4.6. A Summary Analysis: The Finale of D. 537 4.7. Conclusion ADD CUT 1. One alteration only, + x 1. One alteration only, - x SIZE a. Minimally different, + 1 a. Minimally different, -1 1. by repetition (at the same pitch 1. deletion of originally repeated level) material 2. by sequence (repetition at a 2. deletion of non-repeated different pitch level) material a. by repetition of multiple referential measures, en bloc (backing up) STRATEGY b. by repetition of a single referential measure (stasis) 3. by composing new material Figure 4.1. Category 2 Strategies. 151 The ways in which thematic and harmonic gestures reappear go well beyond what can be captured by the standard notions of return or recapitulation.1 Like virtually all Western music, the music of the common-practice period is characterized by formal correspondences of various kinds. Such correspondences usually do not form exact symmetries, however, even at the phrase level. This stems partly, no doubt, from distaste for too much repetition and regularity—for predictability, that is, the negative side of the symmetrical coin.2 At this very early date, Riepel could scarcely be expected to realize what he was observing; later, of course, asymmetry would set in on a much greater scale.3 If one does not perceive how a work repeats itself, the work is, almost literally, not perceptible and therefore, at the same time, not intelligible.
[Show full text]