DOCSLIB.ORG

Complex and Almost-Complex Structures on Six Dimensional Manifolds

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

COMPLEX AND ALMOST-COMPLEX STRUCTURES ON SIX DIMENSIONAL MANIFOLDS A Dissertation presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School University of Missouri-Columbia In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy by JAMES RYAN BROWN Dr. Jan Segert, Dissertation Supervisor MAY 2006 c Copyright by James Ryan Brown 2006 All Rights Reserved The undersigned, appointed by the Dean of the Graduate School, have examined the dissertation entitled COMPLEX AND ALMOST-COMPLEX STRUCTURES ON SIX DIMENSIONAL MANIFOLDS presented by James Ryan Brown a candidate for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy and hereby certify that in their opinion it is worthy of acceptance. Jan Segert Bahram Mashhoon Dan Edidin Carmen Chicone Yuri Latushkin Acknowledgments As a student in the mathematics department at the University of Missouri-Columbia I have been influenced by many excellent teachers. My first thanks goes to the staff of the mathematics department, both past and present. Without their efforts I would have undoubtedly spent much more time on the administrative aspects of my position. I would like to thank the department and university for financial support to travel to conferences and for making it possible for me to be a part of the larger mathematical and academic communities. Of the professors I have had at the University of Missouri, Shuguang Wang and Zhenbo Qin are among those who have most influenced my development. The members of my committee have been particularly helpful over the time I have spent here. I would like to thank Bahram Mashhoon for several helpful comments on earlier work which have contributed to the writing of this manuscript. I would like to thank Carmen Chicone for introducing me to the exciting work of Kazdan and Warner during my comprehensive examination. It has been in this context that I learned about elliptic partial differential equations. I would like to thank Yuri Latushkin for a number of conversations in which he stimulated me intellectually and ii offered many encouragements and suggestions. Dan Edidin has influenced me greatly both in the several classes I have taken with him as well as the many conversations we have had. I am very appreciative for his helping me to tie together many of the ideas common to both differential geometry and algebraic geometry. I would especially like to express my appreciation to my advisor, Jan Segert. Without his guidance and careful reading of this and many other writings I would likely not have completed this degree. It was a rare conversation that I did not leave with more insight. I am deeply indebted to my family and friends for all of their moral and logistical support. There are too many to enumerate, but among the many colleagues I wish to thank are Geoff, Chris, Jared, Jaewon, Joseph, Yevgen, Krishna, Georgiy, Samar, Sabine, and Raj. I would like to thank Eskil, Lorentz, Mark, Stacie, Jordan, Zak, Scott, Jim, Chris, and David for all of their grounding conversations. Karen, Car- olyn, Eva, Charles, Aaron and Julianne have been a great help over the past several years. My mom Donna and my dad Walt have both helped more than I can express. Amanda, Shannon, and Luciane have supported me in many ways and have provided excellent examples of how to complete projects. Finally I am most grateful to HP and to my wife Ardith. Without their support and love I would certainly not have completed this manuscript. iii Contents Acknowledgments ii Abstract vi 1 Preliminaries 1 1.1 Almost-complex structures and torsion . 2 1.2 Summary of known results on S6 . 6 1.3 Almost-complex structures on CP3 . 10 1.4 Summary of known results on projective space . 13 1.5 Statement of results . 14 2 Properties of hypothetical complex structures on CP3 16 2.1 Dolbeault cohomology and the Fr¨olicher spectral sequence . 17 2.2 Cohomology relations for hypothetical exotic complex structures . 23 2.3 Fr¨olicher Spectral Sequence Computations . 27 2.3.1 The Fr¨olicher Spectral Sequence for a hypothetical complex S6 28 2.3.2 The Fr¨olicher Spectral Sequence for hypothetical exotic structures 30 iv 2.3.3 General descriptions of the terms of the Fr¨olicher spectral se- quence . 36 3 Symmetric complex structures 39 3.1 Index theorems . 40 3.2 Actions of C∗ . 42 3.3 Future directions . 53 A Octonions and almost-complex structures 55 B Index theorems 59 B.1 Characteristic Classes . 59 B.2 The Atiyah-Singer Index Theorem . 63 B.3 The Atiyah-Bott Fixed Point Formula . 65 B.4 The Atiyah-Segal G-Index Theorem . 67 Bibliography 69 Vita 79 v COMPLEX AND ALMOST-COMPLEX STRUCTURES ON SIX DIMENSIONAL MANIFOLDS James Ryan Brown Dr. Jan Segert ABSTRACT We investigate the properties of hypothetical exotic complex structures on three dimensional complex projective space CP3. This is motivated by the long stand- ing question in differential geometry of whether or not the six sphere S6 admits an integrable almost-complex structure. An affirmative answer to this question would imply the existence of many exotic complex structures on CP3. It is known that CP3 admits many topologically different almost-complex structures, but it is unknown whether or not CP3 admits an integrable almost-complex structure other that the standard K¨ahler structure. In this manuscript we give lower bounds on the Hodge numbers of hypothetical exotic structures on CP3 and a necessary condition for the Fr¨olicher spectral sequence to degenerate at the second level. We also give topolog- ical constraints on the classes of hypothetical exotic complex structures which are C∗-symmetric. We give restrictions on the fixed point sets of such C∗ actions. vi Was sich ub¨ erhaupt sagen l¨asst, l¨asst die Worte fassen; und wovon man nicht reden kann, darub¨ er mus man schweigen. -Ludwig Wittenstein, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus What can be said at all can be said clearly; and whereof one cannot speak thereof one must be silent. -C.K. Odgen, English translation vii Chapter 1 Preliminaries A famous long-standing question in differential geometry is whether or not the six sphere S6 admits a complex structure. Hirzebruch and Yau have each listed this prob- lem among the fundamental open problems in differential geometry in [36, Problem 13] and [72, Problem 52], respectively. Borel and Serre [14] have shown that the only spheres which admit almost-complex structures are the two sphere S2 and the six sphere S6, see appendix A for constructions of almost-complex structures on S2 and S6 modeled on the sets of quaternions and octonions, respectively. By deforming a given almost-complex structure one obtains many almost-complex structures on S 2 and S6. It is well-known that S2 admits a unique complex structure. It is unknown, however, whether or not S6 admits any integrable almost-complex structure. Over the past fifty years none of the assertions of resolution of this question has withstood close scrutiny. There have been several published and unpublished manuscripts claiming to show that S6 does not admit a complex structure, e.g. [2] and [39], but none has gained acceptance among experts. On the other hand there 1 is also a recent preprint [28] which asserts that S6 is indeed a complex manifold, but this was found to have a gap in the proof of the main theorem and was quickly withdrawn by its author, leaving the question unanswered still. In addition to having no definitive answer to this existence question, there are relatively few results which give an indication of what the actual answer is. In this chapter we list and summarize the prerequisite material and previous results in this field. In section 1.1 we define complex and almost-complex structures on manifolds and give a classical condition which is both necessary and sufficient for an almost-complex structure to be complex. In section 1.2 we list some of the advances on the six sphere question. In section 1.3 we describe how this question may be reframed in the context of projective space followed by a summary of results on projective space in section 1.4. We conclude in section 1.5 with an announcement of the results to be found in this dissertation. 1.1 Almost-complex structures and torsion In this section we follow [45] and [46] to describe briefly complex and almost-complex structures on manifolds, and we state a classical theorem giving a necessary and sufficient condition for an almost-complex structure to be integrable. Recall that a smooth n-dimensional manifold X is a second countable Hausdorff space which admits a smooth atlas U ; ' , i.e., U is an open covering of X, f i ig f ig ' : U ' (U ) Rn is a homeomorphism, and ' '−1 : ' (U U ) ' (U U ) i i ! i i ⊂ i ◦ j j i \ j ! i i \ j 2 is smooth. A complex manifold X of complex dimension n is a smooth 2n-dimensional n manifold with the additional conditions 'i(Ui) is homeomorphic to a subset of C and ' '−1 : ' (U U ) ' (U U ) is holomorphic. i ◦ j j i \ j ! i i \ j We would like to study manifolds X which are not necessarily complex, but retain a particularly important feature of complex manifolds, that is, the tangent bundle T X of X is a complex vector bundle. We digress for a moment into a discussion of complex vector spaces and complex structures on real vector spaces. Definition 1.1.1. A complex structure J on a real vector space V is an endomor- phism J : V V with the property J 2 = I where I is the identity map.
Recommended publications
  • Orthogonal Symmetric Affine Kac-Moody Algebras

    Orthogonal Symmetric Affine Kac-Moody Algebras

    TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 367, Number 10, October 2015, Pages 7133–7159 http://dx.doi.org/10.1090/tran/6257 Article electronically published on April 20, 2015 ORTHOGONAL SYMMETRIC AFFINE KAC-MOODY ALGEBRAS WALTER FREYN Abstract. Riemannian symmetric spaces are fundamental objects in finite dimensional differential geometry. An important problem is the construction of symmetric spaces for generalizations of simple Lie groups, especially their closest infinite dimensional analogues, known as affine Kac-Moody groups. We solve this problem and construct affine Kac-Moody symmetric spaces in a series of several papers. This paper focuses on the algebraic side; more precisely, we introduce OSAKAs, the algebraic structures used to describe the connection between affine Kac-Moody symmetric spaces and affine Kac-Moody algebras and describe their classification. 1. Introduction Riemannian symmetric spaces are fundamental objects in finite dimensional dif- ferential geometry displaying numerous connections with Lie theory, physics, and analysis. The search for infinite dimensional symmetric spaces associated to affine Kac-Moody algebras has been an open question for 20 years, since it was first asked by C.-L. Terng in [Ter95]. We present a complete solution to this problem in a series of several papers, dealing successively with the functional analytic, the algebraic and the geometric aspects. In this paper, building on work of E. Heintze and C. Groß in [HG12], we introduce and classify orthogonal symmetric affine Kac- Moody algebras (OSAKAs). OSAKAs are the central objects in the classification of affine Kac-Moody symmetric spaces as they provide the crucial link between the geometric and the algebraic side of the theory.
  • A Geometric Take on Metric Learning

    A Geometric Take on Metric Learning

    A Geometric take on Metric Learning Søren Hauberg Oren Freifeld Michael J. Black MPI for Intelligent Systems Brown University MPI for Intelligent Systems Tubingen,¨ Germany Providence, US Tubingen,¨ Germany [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Abstract Multi-metric learning techniques learn local metric tensors in different parts of a feature space. With such an approach, even simple classifiers can be competitive with the state-of-the-art because the distance measure locally adapts to the struc- ture of the data. The learned distance measure is, however, non-metric, which has prevented multi-metric learning from generalizing to tasks such as dimensional- ity reduction and regression in a principled way. We prove that, with appropriate changes, multi-metric learning corresponds to learning the structure of a Rieman- nian manifold. We then show that this structure gives us a principled way to perform dimensionality reduction and regression according to the learned metrics. Algorithmically, we provide the first practical algorithm for computing geodesics according to the learned metrics, as well as algorithms for computing exponential and logarithmic maps on the Riemannian manifold. Together, these tools let many Euclidean algorithms take advantage of multi-metric learning. We illustrate the approach on regression and dimensionality reduction tasks that involve predicting measurements of the human body from shape data. 1 Learning and Computing Distances Statistics relies on measuring distances. When the Euclidean metric is insufficient, as is the case in many real problems, standard methods break down. This is a key motivation behind metric learning, which strives to learn good distance measures from data.
  • Arxiv:Hep-Th/0006117V1 16 Jun 2000 Oadmarolf Donald VERSION HYPER - Style

    Arxiv:Hep-Th/0006117V1 16 Jun 2000 Oadmarolf Donald VERSION HYPER - Style

    Preprint typeset in JHEP style. - HYPER VERSION SUGP-00/6-1 hep-th/0006117 Chern-Simons terms and the Three Notions of Charge Donald Marolf Physics Department, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York 13244 Abstract: In theories with Chern-Simons terms or modified Bianchi identities, it is useful to define three notions of either electric or magnetic charge associated with a given gauge field. A language for discussing these charges is introduced and the proper- ties of each charge are described. ‘Brane source charge’ is gauge invariant and localized but not conserved or quantized, ‘Maxwell charge’ is gauge invariant and conserved but not localized or quantized, while ‘Page charge’ conserved, localized, and quantized but not gauge invariant. This provides a further perspective on the issue of charge quanti- zation recently raised by Bachas, Douglas, and Schweigert. For the Proceedings of the E.S. Fradkin Memorial Conference. Keywords: Supergravity, p–branes, D-branes. arXiv:hep-th/0006117v1 16 Jun 2000 Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Brane Source Charge and Brane-ending effects 3 3. Maxwell Charge and Asymptotic Conditions 6 4. Page Charge and Kaluza-Klein reduction 7 5. Discussion 9 1. Introduction One of the intriguing properties of supergravity theories is the presence of Abelian Chern-Simons terms and their duals, the modified Bianchi identities, in the dynamics of the gauge fields. Such cases have the unusual feature that the equations of motion for the gauge field are non-linear in the gauge fields even though the associated gauge groups are Abelian. For example, massless type IIA supergravity contains a relation of the form dF˜4 + F2 H3 =0, (1.1) ∧ where F˜4, F2,H3 are gauge invariant field strengths of rank 4, 2, 3 respectively.
  • Hodge Decomposition

    Hodge Decomposition

    Hodge Decomposition Daniel Lowengrub April 27, 2014 1 Introduction All of the content in these notes in contained in the book Differential Analysis on Complex Man- ifolds by Raymond Wells. The primary objective here is to highlight the steps needed to prove the Hodge decomposition theorems for real and complex manifolds, in addition to providing intuition as to how everything fits together. 1.1 The Decomposition Theorem On a given complex manifold X, there are two natural cohomologies to consider. One is the de Rham Cohomology which can be defined on a general, possibly non complex, manifold. The second one is the Dolbeault cohomology which uses the complex structure. We’ll quickly go over the definitions of these cohomologies in order to set notation but for a precise discussion I recommend Huybrechts or Wells. If X is a manifold, we can define the de Rahm Complex to be the chain complex 0 E(Ω0)(X) −d E(Ω1)(X) −d ::: Where Ω = T∗ denotes the cotangent vector bundle and Ωk is the alternating product Ωk = ΛkΩ. In general, we’ll use the notation! E(E) to! denote the sheaf! of sections associated to a vector bundle E. The boundary operator is the usual differentiation operator. The de Rham cohomology of the manifold X is defined to be the cohomology of the de Rham chain complex: d Ker(E(Ωn)(X) − E(Ωn+1)(X)) n (X R) = HdR , d Im(E(Ωn-1)(X) − E(Ωn)(X)) ! We can also consider the de Rham cohomology with complex coefficients by tensoring the de Rham complex with C in order to obtain the de Rham complex! with complex coefficients 0 d 1 d 0 E(ΩC)(X) − E(ΩC)(X) − ::: where ΩC = Ω ⊗ C and the differential d is linearly extended.
  • Riemann Surfaces

    Riemann Surfaces

    RIEMANN SURFACES AARON LANDESMAN CONTENTS 1. Introduction 2 2. Maps of Riemann Surfaces 4 2.1. Defining the maps 4 2.2. The multiplicity of a map 4 2.3. Ramification Loci of maps 6 2.4. Applications 6 3. Properness 9 3.1. Definition of properness 9 3.2. Basic properties of proper morphisms 9 3.3. Constancy of degree of a map 10 4. Examples of Proper Maps of Riemann Surfaces 13 5. Riemann-Hurwitz 15 5.1. Statement of Riemann-Hurwitz 15 5.2. Applications 15 6. Automorphisms of Riemann Surfaces of genus ≥ 2 18 6.1. Statement of the bound 18 6.2. Proving the bound 18 6.3. We rule out g(Y) > 1 20 6.4. We rule out g(Y) = 1 20 6.5. We rule out g(Y) = 0, n ≥ 5 20 6.6. We rule out g(Y) = 0, n = 4 20 6.7. We rule out g(C0) = 0, n = 3 20 6.8. 21 7. Automorphisms in low genus 0 and 1 22 7.1. Genus 0 22 7.2. Genus 1 22 7.3. Example in Genus 3 23 Appendix A. Proof of Riemann Hurwitz 25 Appendix B. Quotients of Riemann surfaces by automorphisms 29 References 31 1 2 AARON LANDESMAN 1. INTRODUCTION In this course, we’ll discuss the theory of Riemann surfaces. Rie- mann surfaces are a beautiful breeding ground for ideas from many areas of math. In this way they connect seemingly disjoint fields, and also allow one to use tools from different areas of math to study them.
  • Lattices and Vertex Operator Algebras

    Lattices and Vertex Operator Algebras

    My collaboration with Geoffrey Schellekens List Three Descriptions of Schellekens List Lattices and Vertex Operator Algebras Gerald H¨ohn Kansas State University Vertex Operator Algebras, Number Theory, and Related Topics A conference in Honor of Geoffrey Mason Sacramento, June 2018 Gerald H¨ohn Kansas State University Lattices and Vertex Operator Algebras My collaboration with Geoffrey Schellekens List Three Descriptions of Schellekens List How all began From gerald Mon Apr 24 18:49:10 1995 To: [email protected] Subject: Santa Cruz / Babymonster twisted sector Dear Prof. Mason, Thank you for your detailed letter from Thursday. It is probably the best choice for me to come to Santa Cruz in the year 95-96. I see some projects which I can do in connection with my thesis. The main project is the classification of all self-dual SVOA`s with rank smaller than 24. The method to do this is developed in my thesis, but not all theorems are proven. So I think it is really a good idea to stay at a place where I can discuss the problems with other people. [...] I must probably first finish my thesis to make an application [to the DFG] and then they need around 4 months to decide the application, so in principle I can come September or October. [...] I have not all of this proven, but probably the methods you have developed are enough. I hope that I have at least really constructed my Babymonster SVOA of rank 23 1/2. (edited for spelling and grammar) Gerald H¨ohn Kansas State University Lattices and Vertex Operator Algebras My collaboration with Geoffrey Schellekens List Three Descriptions of Schellekens List Theorem (H.
  • Introduction to Quantum Q-Langlands Correspondence

    Introduction to Quantum Q-Langlands Correspondence

    Introduction to Quantum q-Langlands Correspondence Ming Zhang∗ May 16{19, 2017 Abstract Quantum q-Langlands Correspondence was introduced by Aganagic, Frenkel and Okounkov in their recent work [AFO17]. Roughly speaking, it is a correspondence between q-deformed conformal blocks of the quantum affine algebra and the deformed W-algebra. In this mini-course, I will define these objects and discuss some results in quantum K-theory of the Nakajima quiver varieties which is the key ingredient in the proof of the correspondence (in the simply-laced case). It will be helpful to know the basic concepts in the theory of Lie algebras (roots, weights, etc.). Contents 1 Introduction 2 1.1 The geometric Langlands correspondence.............................2 1.2 A representation-theoretic statement and its generalization in [AFO17].............2 2 Lie algebras 2 2.1 Root systems.............................................3 2.2 The Langlands dual.........................................4 3 Affine Kac{Moody algebras4 3.1 Via generators and relations.....................................5 3.2 Via extensions............................................6 4 Representations of affine Kac{Moody algebras7 4.1 The extended algebra........................................7 4.2 Representations of finite-dimensional Lie algebras.........................8 4.2.1 Weights............................................8 4.2.2 Verma modules........................................8 4.3 Representations of affine Kac{Moody algebras...........................9 4.3.1 The category of representations.............................9 4.3.2 Verma modulesO........................................ 10 4.3.3 The evaluation representation................................ 11 4.3.4 Level.............................................. 11 ∗Notes were taken by Takumi Murayama, who is responsible for any and all errors. Please e-mail [email protected] with any more corrections. Compiled on May 21, 2017. 1 1 Introduction We will follow Aganagic, Frenkel, and Okounkov's paper [AFO17], which came out in January of this year.
  • Holomorphic Embedding of Complex Curves in Spaces of Constant Holomorphic Curvature (Wirtinger's Theorem/Kaehler Manifold/Riemann Surfaces) ISSAC CHAVEL and HARRY E

    Holomorphic Embedding of Complex Curves in Spaces of Constant Holomorphic Curvature (Wirtinger's Theorem/Kaehler Manifold/Riemann Surfaces) ISSAC CHAVEL and HARRY E

    Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 69, No. 3, pp. 633-635, March 1972 Holomorphic Embedding of Complex Curves in Spaces of Constant Holomorphic Curvature (Wirtinger's theorem/Kaehler manifold/Riemann surfaces) ISSAC CHAVEL AND HARRY E. RAUCH* The City College of The City University of New York and * The Graduate Center of The City University of New York, 33 West 42nd St., New York, N.Y. 10036 Communicated by D. C. Spencer, December 21, 1971 ABSTRACT A special case of Wirtinger's theorem ever, the converse is not true in general: the complex curve asserts that a complex curve (two-dimensional) hob-o embedded as a real minimal surface is not necessarily holo- morphically embedded in a Kaehler manifold is a minimal are obstructions. With the by morphically embedded-there surface. The converse is not necessarily true. Guided that we view the considerations from the theory of moduli of Riemann moduli problem in mind, this fact suggests surfaces, we discover (among other results) sufficient embedding of our complex curve as a real minimal surface topological aind differential-geometric conditions for a in a Kaehler manifold as the solution to the differential-geo- minimal (Riemannian) immersion of a 2-manifold in for our present mapping problem metric metric extremal problem complex projective space with the Fubini-Study as our infinitesimal moduli, differential- to be holomorphic. and that we then seek, geometric invariants on the curve whose vanishing forms neces- sary and sufficient conditions for the minimal embedding to be INTRODUCTION AND MOTIVATION holomorphic. Going further, we observe that minimal surface It is known [1-5] how Riemann's conception of moduli for con- evokes the notion of second fundamental forms; while the formal mapping of homeomorphic, multiply connected Rie- moduli problem, again, suggests quadratic differentials.
  • Spectral Data for L^2 Cohomology

    Spectral Data for L^2 Cohomology

    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2018 Spectral Data For L^2 Cohomology Xiaofei Jin University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Mathematics Commons Recommended Citation Jin, Xiaofei, "Spectral Data For L^2 Cohomology" (2018). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 2815. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2815 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2815 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Spectral Data For L^2 Cohomology Abstract We study the spectral data for the higher direct images of a parabolic Higgs bundle along a map between a surface and a curve with both vertical and horizontal parabolic divisors. We describe the cohomology of a parabolic Higgs bundle on a curve in terms of its spectral data. We also calculate the integral kernel that reproduces the spectral data for the higher direct images of a parabolic Higgs bundle on the surface. This research is inspired by and extends the works of Simpson [21] and Donagi-Pantev-Simpson [7]. Degree Type Dissertation Degree Name Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) Graduate Group Mathematics First Advisor Tony Pantev Keywords Higgs bundle, Monodromy weight filtration, Nonabelian Hodge theory, Parabolic L^2 Dolbeault complex, Root stack, Spectral correspondence Subject Categories Mathematics This dissertation is available at ScholarlyCommons: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2815 SPECTRAL DATA FOR L2 COHOMOLOGY Xiaofei Jin A DISSERTATION in Mathematics Presented to the Faculties of the University of Pennsylvania in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2018 Supervisor of Dissertation Tony Pantev, Class of 1939 Professor in Mathematics Graduate Group Chairperson Wolfgang Ziller, Francis J.
  • Complex Manifolds

    Complex Manifolds

    Complex Manifolds Lecture notes based on the course by Lambertus van Geemen A.A. 2012/2013 Author: Michele Ferrari. For any improvement suggestion, please email me at: [email protected] Contents n 1 Some preliminaries about C 3 2 Basic theory of complex manifolds 6 2.1 Complex charts and atlases . 6 2.2 Holomorphic functions . 8 2.3 The complex tangent space and cotangent space . 10 2.4 Differential forms . 12 2.5 Complex submanifolds . 14 n 2.6 Submanifolds of P ............................... 16 2.6.1 Complete intersections . 18 2 3 The Weierstrass }-function; complex tori and cubics in P 21 3.1 Complex tori . 21 3.2 Elliptic functions . 22 3.3 The Weierstrass }-function . 24 3.4 Tori and cubic curves . 26 3.4.1 Addition law on cubic curves . 28 3.4.2 Isomorphisms between tori . 30 2 Chapter 1 n Some preliminaries about C We assume that the reader has some familiarity with the notion of a holomorphic function in one complex variable. We extend that notion with the following n n Definition 1.1. Let f : C ! C, U ⊆ C open with a 2 U, and let z = (z1; : : : ; zn) be n the coordinates in C . f is holomorphic in a = (a1; : : : ; an) 2 U if f has a convergent power series expansion: +1 X k1 kn f(z) = ak1;:::;kn (z1 − a1) ··· (zn − an) k1;:::;kn=0 This means, in particular, that f is holomorphic in each variable. Moreover, we define OCn (U) := ff : U ! C j f is holomorphicg m A map F = (F1;:::;Fm): U ! C is holomorphic if each Fj is holomorphic.
  • INTRODUCTION to ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY 1. Preliminary Of

    INTRODUCTION to ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY 1. Preliminary Of

    INTRODUCTION TO ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY WEI-PING LI 1. Preliminary of Calculus on Manifolds 1.1. Tangent Vectors. What are tangent vectors we encounter in Calculus? 2 0 (1) Given a parametrised curve α(t) = x(t); y(t) in R , α (t) = x0(t); y0(t) is a tangent vector of the curve. (2) Given a surface given by a parameterisation x(u; v) = x(u; v); y(u; v); z(u; v); @x @x n = × is a normal vector of the surface. Any vector @u @v perpendicular to n is a tangent vector of the surface at the corresponding point. (3) Let v = (a; b; c) be a unit tangent vector of R3 at a point p 2 R3, f(x; y; z) be a differentiable function in an open neighbourhood of p, we can have the directional derivative of f in the direction v: @f @f @f D f = a (p) + b (p) + c (p): (1.1) v @x @y @z In fact, given any tangent vector v = (a; b; c), not necessarily a unit vector, we still can define an operator on the set of functions which are differentiable in open neighbourhood of p as in (1.1) Thus we can take the viewpoint that each tangent vector of R3 at p is an operator on the set of differential functions at p, i.e. @ @ @ v = (a; b; v) ! a + b + c j ; @x @y @z p or simply @ @ @ v = (a; b; c) ! a + b + c (1.2) @x @y @z 3 with the evaluation at p understood.
  • Complex Cobordism and Almost Complex Fillings of Contact Manifolds

    Complex Cobordism and Almost Complex Fillings of Contact Manifolds

    MSci Project in Mathematics COMPLEX COBORDISM AND ALMOST COMPLEX FILLINGS OF CONTACT MANIFOLDS November 2, 2016 Naomi L. Kraushar supervised by Dr C Wendl University College London Abstract An important problem in contact and symplectic topology is the question of which contact manifolds are symplectically fillable, in other words, which contact manifolds are the boundaries of symplectic manifolds, such that the symplectic structure is consistent, in some sense, with the given contact struc- ture on the boundary. The homotopy data on the tangent bundles involved in this question is finding an almost complex filling of almost contact manifolds. It is known that such fillings exist, so that there are no obstructions on the tangent bundles to the existence of symplectic fillings of contact manifolds; however, so far a formal proof of this fact has not been written down. In this paper, we prove this statement. We use cobordism theory to deal with the stable part of the homotopy obstruction, and then use obstruction theory, and a variant on surgery theory known as contact surgery, to deal with the unstable part of the obstruction. Contents 1 Introduction 2 2 Vector spaces and vector bundles 4 2.1 Complex vector spaces . .4 2.2 Symplectic vector spaces . .7 2.3 Vector bundles . 13 3 Contact manifolds 19 3.1 Contact manifolds . 19 3.2 Submanifolds of contact manifolds . 23 3.3 Complex, almost complex, and stably complex manifolds . 25 4 Universal bundles and classifying spaces 30 4.1 Universal bundles . 30 4.2 Universal bundles for O(n) and U(n).............. 33 4.3 Stable vector bundles .