Mahatma Gandhi NREGA

2nd Performance Review Committee Meeting 20th December, 2019 NASC, PUSA, New Delhi OUTLINE

Achievements SECURE 1 Physical & Financial 6 GIS Planning, CFP Project 2 GeoMGNREGA 7

3 Timely Payment 8 PROJECT UNNATI

4 SOCIAL AUDIT 9 Worksite Management

COMPLETION OF Monitoring 5 INCOMPLETE WORK 10 ACHEIVEMENTS 1 PHYSICAL & FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE – 2019-20 SO FAR

176.96 crore Person-days Generated (69%) Completed Works 51.28 lakh Average days employment 39.26 per HH HHs 100 days Employment 10.34 lakh

Total Central Release ₹ 55,696 crore 100% 120% 140% 20% 40% 60% 80% 0%

MAN 118% RAJ 118% JHA 108% TN 105%

MIZ 104% 2019 FY Budget Achievement Labour KER 103% PUN 103% HP 99% ASA 99% PUD 98% National Achievement: 89% KAR 96% AP 95% TEL 92% ODI 92% TRI 91% GUJ 90% NAT 89% UP 87% A&N 83% MP 82% UK 79% CHA 76%

MEG 75% NAG 75% HAR 72% SIK 72% (As on 30 MAH 70% BIH 67% th

ARU 66% Nov Nov 2019)

WB 61% - J&K 45% 20 LAK 15%

GOA 2% Labour Budget Improvement from FY 2018-19

140% Increase in LB Achievement 120%

100% National Avg. 80%

60%

40%

20%

TRI

TEL

SIK

BIH

MIZ

KER

J&K

RAJ LAK

ODI

JHA NAT

PUD

PUN KAR

ARU

GUJ

ASA HAR

A&N

CHA

MEG

NAG MAH

MAN GOA % age Expenditure of Individual Work

64 Other than PMAY-G FY 2019-20 (As on 15th Dec 2019)

39 National Avg.: 16% 32 30 25 20 20 19 17 16 16 16 16 15 13 12 11 10 9 7 6 5 5

2 2 1 1 1 0 0

TRI

SIK

TEL

BIH

MIZ

KER

RAJ

J&K

ODI

JHA NAT

KAR

ASA

PUN

ARU

GUJ

HAR

CHA

A&N

MEG

MAH

NAG MAN Comparison with FY 2018-19

64 Other than PMAY-G FY 2019-20 (As on 15th Dec 2019)

Increase in %age 39

32 30 25 20 20 19 17 16 16 16 16 15 National Avg. 13 12 11 10 9 7 6 5 5

2 2 1 1 1 0 0

TRI

SIK

TEL

BIH

MIZ

KER

RAJ

J&K

ODI

JHA NAT

KAR

ASA

PUN

ARU

GUJ

HAR

CHA

A&N

MEG

MAH

NAG MAN GIS Based Planning GPs GIS BASED PLAN

2 GP Plan/Block using GIS/RS 13,842 plans targeted

12,340 (89%) plans prepared 5,302 plans verified & uploaded GIS Training Status

Map not to scale GP Plans Approved After MTR meeting

Map not to scale 09th & 10th January 2020 4-Regional

16th & 17th January 2020 GIS Training Proposed

06th & 07th January 2020

26th 27th December 2019 2

Map not to scale Way Forward

GP Plan approved on NREGASoft – 31st December 2019

NRSC Planning Portal ( by 31st January 2020)

Targetted GP Plan- using GIS/RS Financial Year : 2019-20 – Addl. 2 GP/Block till March 2020 2020-21 – All Balance GPs Timely Payment Guidelines and Progress SOP – Timely Payment A ready reckoner to monitor timely payment of wages

 SOP issued on 30th Nov, 2017

 States were required to issue the SOP to the District and Block functionaries

States yet to Notify

1.Andhra Pradesh 2.Uttar Pradesh

3.Goa 4.Lakshadweep Overall Performance

86% 2018-19 2019-20

65% 61% 47%

27% 13%

Stage I Stage II Pending Regeneration out of Rejected Transactions PERFORMANCE (T + 8 DAYS) – 2019-20

National Average: 86% (As on 18th Dec 2019)

TRI

TEL

SIK

BIH

MIZ

KER

J&K

RAJ LAK

ARP

NAT

JHA PUD

KAR PUN

GUJ

ASA HAR

ODS

A&N

CHA

MEG

NAG

MAH

MAN GOA PERFORMANCE STAGE-2 – 2019-20

th 99 98 98 98 National Average: 61% (As on 18 Dec 2019) 92 91 90 88 87 87 81 78 78 76 76 71 69 65 62 61 61 61 55 51 50 50 45 37 33

0 0 0

TRI

TEL

SIK

BIH

MIZ

KER

J&K

RAJ LAK

ARP

NAT

JHA PUD

KAR PUN

GUJ

HAR ASA

ODS

A&N

CHA

MEG

NAG

MAH

MAN GOA % PENDING REGENERATION AFTER REJECTION

99% FY 2019-20 (As on 15th Dec 2019) National Average: 27% 65% 60% 57% 54% 49% 48% 47% 46% 40% 37% 35% 33% 32% 31% 28% 27% 27% 26% 26% 21% 19% 18% 16% 11% 11% 8% 5% 5%

TRI

SIK

BIH

MIZ

KER

J&K

RAJ

ARP

NAT

JHA PUD

KAR PUN

GUJ

ASA HAR

ODS

A&N

CHA

MEG

NAG

MAH MAN EXPECTATIONS FROM STATES

• Stage 1 FTO 100% Generation in T+8 Days

• Tracking FTO for Improving Stage 2

• Regeneration of Rejected- 48 Hours

SOCIAL AUDIT INDEPENDENT SOCIAL AUDIT UNIT

States without any SAU setup • Goa

States with SAU not established as per the Auditing Standards for Social Audit • West Bengal • Jharkhand SOCIAL AUDIT PLANNED FOR GPs (ATLEAST ONCE) FY 2019-20 FY 2019-20 (As Per MIS) No Social Audit Calendar uploaded

Less than 50% of GPs planned in the calendar

50% - 90% of GPs planned in the calendar

More than 90% of GPs planned in the calendar FINANCIAL MISAPPROPRIATION- ISSUES FY 2019-20 (AS PER MIS) 72,007 71,805

TOTAL FINANCIAL MISAPPROPRATION AMOUNT

Issues ATR Pending ACTION TAKEN REPORT- FY2019-20 (AS PER MIS)

Grievances Reported Process Violation 46,298 43,979 1,33,68 1,27,28 5 8

Issues ATR Pending Issues ATR Pending EXPECTATION FROM STATES

• RECOVERY OF MISAPPROPIATION AMOUNT

• ACTION ON GRIEVANCES & PROCESS VIOLATION

• UPDATION OF SOCIAL AUDIT REPORTS AND ATR ON MIS (REAL TIME BASIS)

• INDPENDENT SAU - AUDITING STANDARDS Completion of Incomplete Work INCOMPLETE WORKS

31st January 2020 31st March 2020

AWC 17,118 27,440 Water 2,27,866 4,46,264 Conservation

Individual 6,41,038 12,56,586

Total 16,92,227 39,44,954 EXPENDITURE > 100% FS NEEDS TO BE REVISED & TOP PRIORITY TO BE ACCORDED 40 34 35 NATIONAL TOTAL

1.27 lakhs 25

15 14 13 13 10

10 8 (In thousand) (In 5 5 4 Incomplete works works Incomplete 4 4 5 2 2 0 WB BIH AP TEL UP ODI TN MAH MEG JHA RAJ GUJ KER EXPENDITURE - 75% to 100% 250 KEY: BDO/ PO – Priority to such works while issuing MR 213

200

NATIONAL TOTAL

150 141 11.39 lakhs

99 100 82 73 (In thousand) (In 69 63 59 57 Incomplete works Incomplete 53 50 50 39 35 27 19 18 16

0 WB BIH UP ODI AP MP TEL JHA RAJ MAH KAR CHA TN KER GUJ ASA HP ONLY MATERIAL EXPENDITURE

40 Wage payment must precede payment of material: AMC

35 34

NATIONAL TOTAL 25 69,107 20

15 10

(In thousand) (In 10 Incomplete works Incomplete 5 4 5 3 3 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 WB TEL TN AP BIH ODI JHA TRI UP MP KAR MAH HP RAJ CHA NO EXPENDITURE s i n c e 3 1 st M a r c h 2 0 1 8

250 EITHER START THEM IMMEDIATELY OR GET THEM DELETED

200

NATIONAL TOTAL 150 4.83 lakhs

100 (In thousand)(In

Incomplete works Incomplete 50

0 CURRENT STATUS OF IMPLEMENTATION

595 DISTRICTS 24 STATES 3 UTs

55.27 Lakh WORKS in SECURE

ESTIMATES APPROVED 20.95 Lakh ONLINE SECURE STATE WISE LIVE STATUS

Completely live on SECURE

Partially live on SECURE

Not live on SECURE

Not on NREGASoft 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 0%

JHA 78% MIZ 73% UP 59% PUD 58% TN 58% UK 56% HAR 55%

KAR 48% STATE

CHA 47% National Achievement: 42% MAH 46%

J&K 45% - WISE ESTIMATION STATUSESTIMATIONWISE BIH 45% ODI 43% NAT 42% KER 41% MAN 39%

HP 28% STATES TO IMPROVE MP 28% WB 27%

SIK 23% GUJ 23% (As on 15 TRI 21% PUN 14%

RAJ 13% th

Dec 2019)

ASA 9% NAG 9% MEG 7%

Time & Motion Study by States • MORD letter dated 30.11.30217 issued standard template with directions to engage Institute

• Approved outcome to be integrated with SECURE

• Letter dated 07.02.2018 to State/UTs and NIRD&PR for partial assistance not exceeding Rs. 25 lakh

• 50% of the funds after engagement of Institute and balance 50% after approval of TMS reports by State/UTs TMS: PRESENT POSITION

• 5 States - Andaman & Nicobar, Mizoram, Uttar Pradesh, Telangana and Sikkim. TMS under progress through NIRD & PR

• 5 States - Jharkhand, Chhattisgarh, Nagaland, Tamil Nadu and Madhya Pradesh requested NIRD&PR for conducting TMS

• 14 States engaged Institutes – Assam, Bihar, Haryana, Rajasthan, Jammu & Kashmir, Uttarakhand, Kerala, Meghalaya, Karnataka, Tripura, Odisha, Himachal Pradesh, Gujarat and West Bengal: need to expedite

• 8 State/UTs yet to engage Institute - Arunachal Pradesh, Punjab, Manipur, Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra, Goa, Puducherry, Lakshadweep

CFP Project Objective

Experts at each administrative level

Upgrade the skill base

Comprehensive planning using GIS Target Area – 300 Blocks

250 blocks of 117 Aspirational Districts

50 additional Blocks of other backward areas CFP Selection of Blocks

1.Poor Performance 2.High SC Population 3.Tribal Areas

4. Poor Connectivity 5.MWC blocks Project Summary

Project Timeline - 36 months

Functional Unit- Cluster (sub- Block)

Dedicated team - Block , District , State & National level

Domain Experts - GIS, NRM & Livelihood

Flexibility in hiring– CSOs, HR Agencies Operational Structure

National CFP Cell

State CFP Cell

District CFP Cell

Block/ Cluster CFP Cell Operational Structure

National CFP Cell • Implementation: by CSOs or thematic Expert • Criteria to set-up CFP:15,000 job State CFP Cell cards / 25% of the block • 15,000 job cards > 25% of the block area = 1 CFP Team District CFP Cell • Maximum 4 CFP • CFP Team: 2 Experts – NRM, Agri • 1 GIS Expert at block Block/ Cluster CFP Cell • Cost - ₹ 37,770 Lakh ( 76.8%) Operational Structure

•Implementation- directly by State National CFP Cell Government

•CFP Team – 2 Thematic Experts – GIS & NRM State CFP Cell • Engaging Thematic Experts through HR Agency District CFP Cell •Total District CFP Cells – 123 @ ₹ 62.18 Lakh

Block/ Cluster CFP Cell •Cost - ₹ 7,648.14 Lakh ( 15.5%)

Operational Structure

•Implementation- directly by State National CFP Cell Government

•CFP Team – 3 Thematic Experts – GIS, State CFP Cell NRM & Livelihood

• Engaging Thematic Experts through District CFP Cell HR Agency

•Total Cells –28 @ ₹ 126.35 Lakh Block/ Cluster CFP Cell •Cost - ₹ 3,537.8 Lakh ( 7.2 %) Operational Structure

•Implementation- directly by National CFP Cell Ministry of Rural Development

•Engaging Thematic Experts State CFP Cell through NIRD&PR •CFP Team – 3 Thematic Experts – District CFP Cell GIS, NRM & Livelihood

•Total National CFP Cells – 1 Block/ Cluster CFP Cell •Cost - ₹ 213.75 Lakh ( 0.4 %) Key Deliverables

Deliverables/Outcomes for 6 Months 12 Months 18 Months CSOs/CFP Exp. on NRM work : 65% within 100% 100% 100% 6 months Exp. on Individual work: 60% 100% 100% 100% within 6 months Exp. on Agri and allied work: 100% GPs 100% GPs 100% GPs 60% within 6 months 100% Preparation of GIS based 100% GIS plan of 50% execution of execution of GPs plan GPs GIS Plan GIS Plan Commencement of works as 25% 100% 100% per GIS based plan Key Deliverables

Deliverables/Outcomes for 6 Months 12 Months 18 Months CSOs/CFP Completion of works - GIS based 10% 60% 100% INRM plan SC/ST household- 10% more 100% 100% 100% than district average 100% generation of FTO within 8 100% 100% 100% days

Completion rate- national average 80% National Upto National > National within 9 months Average Average Average

PD generation 80% State Average Upto State Average > State Average Monitoring Structure

Quarterly progress review MoRD Level Monitoring - Web Portal

Quarterly progress review by Commissioner MGNREGA State Level  Minutes to be uploaded on NREGASoft Monitoring Structure

District Level •Monthly progress review by DPC/DC

•Weekly progress review by Block Level BDO Funds – 100% GOI

Total Estimated Expenditure Finance ₹491.69 Crore

Annual Fund release – 2 installments PROJECT UNNATI Aims and Objectives

 Upgrade the skill base by providing training to beneficiaries.  Shift from partial employment to full employment  Reduce their dependence on Mahatma Gandhi NREGA  To improve livelihoods. Target Beneficiaries

 Household completed 100 days work – Previous FY  One adult member (age 18-45 yrs.)  Qualification - NSQF  UNNATI is applicable nationwide. Project Framework

 Skilling for wage employment – DDU-GKY

 Skilling for self-Employment - RSETIs or KVKs.

 The candidate to avail only one training

 Ranking of households as per Para 5 of Schedule-I.

 Counselling and mobilization – Kaushal Panjee App. Role of SRLM/ NRLM

 SRLM/ SNSM shall do registration, mobilization, counselling, follow-up of candidates in consultation of State Mahatma Gandhi NREGA Commissioner Office and subordinate offices and by engaging CRP and SHG members of NRLM.

 NRLM to issue appropriate communication in consultation with rural skill development division of MoRD. Project Target & Tenure

2 lakhs beneficiaries to be skilled in 3 years

 Year wise break up of Training to be imparted:

FY 19-20 FY 20-21 FY 21-22

DDU-GKY 25,000 50,000 50,000

RSETI 20,000 20,000 20,000

KVK 5,000 5,000 5,000 Total 50,000 75,000 75,000 Fund flow and fund requirement

 Fund requirement for the project for 3 years Rs.307.34 crore

 Funds flow : in advance to the States

 Separate bank accounts in each State - PFMS

 Separate Budget Head will be created for this purpose.

 Requirements of fund towards stipend will be made available under specific heads of material head.

 Stipend funds will be release in two equal instalments

 The trainee will be paid stipend by the PO/BDO by generating FTOs. Worksite Management Worksite Management

Task based payment

Wage for a day - Based on SoR Worksite Management

Differential wage rate system (CTNPS to GTNPS)

Worksite facilities- Crèche, drinking water, first aid and shade Worksite Management- Women Mate

Total Mates at National level- 1,08,209

Total Women Mates at National level- 23,757 (22%)C

Should aim for 100% Trained Women Mate in NRLM intensive Blocks with full knowledge of SoR: to be drawn from the CRPs/NRLM compliant SHG members 10 Monitoring Monitoring: What you monitor, will get monitored Nothing can be compared with Field Visit of ongoing works: Mandatory inspection every month

Minimum 2 visits per month by Commissioner/ DPC/ PO

Priority on visiting at least 5 ongoing works per months - Check these are on worksite or not: MRs, attendance record v/s physical presence, job card (custody), CIB, payment they got ! and at GP: 7 registers

Monitoring App for Inspection of ongoing works: simple questionnaire Key Issues for Commissioners/DPCs:1/4 • Procurement: • Chapter 7.1.7 of AMC, by not below the BDO, • For Individual beneficiary works: can be procured by Beneficiary themselves- IEC • Rate for building materials > SoR, approval by one level above

Key Issues for Commissioners/DPCs:2/4 • Engineering side: • Quantity in estimate, MB, supply of material should match • CC amount: minimum of FS/Valuation/actual expenditure; otherwise revision of FS needed • Checking of works by appropriate authority(engineer) before CC as per schedule of powers • Old works: generation of new work code for some old works - e.g. GP Bhawan/building; merge them

Key Issues for Commissioners/DPCs:3/4 • Payment issues • Account seeding: JC seeded to some other account- may be deliberate! • GPs to choose for inspection: • 2 GPs in a block: 1st one- their choice, • 2nd one: your choice: • Highest spending GP • Lowest/NIL spending GP: Administrative inefficiency may be there • Material:Labour Ratio: highest

Key Issues for Commissioners/DPCs:4/4

• Right Based Issues: wage seekers- aware of their rights • Custody of Job Cards/Bank pass Book: with the workers • Transparency, Accountability & Good Governance Issues: • MR & Citizen CIB at worksite • Enforcement of GTNPS (Groupwise task Naapi Payment System); Knowledge of SoR: Mate, Proper MB: wage as per task done • Effective Social Audit: Gram sabha, trained audit team(VRPs from CRPs/SHG-NRLM compliant) • Proactive display of information at GP: Wall painting, 100% Geo-Tagging & Proper record keeping: 7 Registers • Monitoring & Field Visits

• 25% material cost Shyama Prasad Mukherji Rurban Mission

Performance Review Committee meeting

Date: 20th December 2019

Physical Achievements so far.. Progress Parameter Achievements since Achievements so June PRC far ICAPs approved 14 288 DPRs approved by SLEC 93 233 Planning Notifications done 59 188

New Initiatives successfully piloted since June PRC: Draft Spatial Outcomes – 7 clusters prepared. Plan Andhra Pradesh, Telangana, Tamil Nadu, Odisha, Manipur, Chhattisgarh PFMS Outcomes – 6 States onboarded. integration Chhattisgarh, Uttar Pradesh, Punjab, Tamil Nadu, Mizoram, Telangana RurbanSoft MIS Achievements so far.. Progress Achievements since June PRC Achievements so far Parameter ICAP entry in 31 268 MIS DPR entry in All 106 DPRs entered by 106 MIS States/UTs between June - Dec Financial Achievements so far (Rs. Cr.)

Convergence CGF Total (Rs. Cr.) (Rs. Cr.) (Rs. Cr.) Investment 21,093 6,844 27,938 Approved Exp. till June 4,497 799 5,295 PRC Exp. From June 1,144 272 1,417 - Nov Exp. Till date 5,641 1,071 6,712 288 ICAPs approved (14 since June PRC)

Pending (12):

1. West Bengal (3 + 4 clusters pending) 2. NCT of Delhi (1) 3. Goa (1) 4. Arunachal Pradesh (1) 5. Maharashtra (1) 6. Telangana (1)

233 DPRs approved by SLEC (93 since June PRC)

Pending (288 – 233 = 55)

1. Jharkhand (13) 2. Assam (8) 3. West Bengal (7) 4. Bihar (5) 5. Maharashtra, Punjab (4 each) 6. Gujarat, Haryana (2 each) 7. Andaman & Nicobar Islands, Arunachal Pradesh, Daman & Diu, Goa, Kerala, Lakshadweep, Madhya Pradesh, Meghalaya, Rajasthan, Uttarakhand (1 each)

9 States/UTs where not a single 188 Planning cluster notified (marked in red) Notifications done (59 more since June PRC)

9 States/UTs where not a single cluster notified:

1. Jharkhand 2. West Bengal 3. Bihar 4. Haryana 5. Andaman & Nicobar Islands 6. Lakshadweep 7. Madhya Pradesh 8. Karnataka 9. Nagaland

State/UT wise clusters where 60% Utilization achieved but proposal yet to be received for release of 2nd installment No. of S. No. State / UT Name of cluster Clusters Alur, Chandarlapadu, Garividi, Nandalur, Nuzendla, 1 Andhra Pradesh Sompeta 6 2 Telangana Bijigirisharif, Kuntala, Shankarpally, Vennacherla 4 3 Jammu & Kashmir Gole Gujaral, Khumriyal 2 Edappal – Vattamkulam, Punnayoorkulam - 4 Kerala Vadakkekad 2 5 Gujarat Vadinar 1 6 Haryana Badli 1 7 Maharashtra Ashti 1 8 Punjab Fatehgarh Churian 1 9 Sikkim Namthang 1 Total 19 10 States/UTs where CGF Exp. CGF - 6 months on- Zero (marked in red) ground progress since June PRC 10 States/UTs reported zero exp. 1. Andaman & Nicobar Islands 2. Arunachal Pradesh 3. Assam 4. Bihar 5. Dadra & Nagar Haveli 6. Goa 7. Haryana Have CGF Exp. 8. Karnataka Zero CGF Exp. 9. Nagaland 10. West Bengal

Convergence – 11 States/UTs where Conv. Exp. Zero (marked in red) 6 months on- ground progress since June PRC 11 States/UTs reported zero exp. 1. Andaman & Nicobar islands 2. Arunachal Pradesh 3. Goa 4. Gujarat 5. Karnataka 6. Madhya Pradesh 7. Nagaland 8. Puducherry 9. Punjab 10. Tripura 11. West Bengal Have Conv. Exp. Zero Conv. Exp.

State wise clusters where more than 40% Utilization achieved needs to expedite for 2nd instalment S. No. State Name of cluster No. of Clusters Choutuppal, Jaligaon, Kondabheemanapally, 1 Telangana Nagaram, Papannapet 5 2 Odisha Dahita, Keshpur, Kuarmunda, Sibtala 4 3 Kerala Mararikulam - Kanjikuzhy, Peralassery - Chembilode 2 4 Maharashtra Sultanpur, Wadoda 2 5 Himachal Pradesh Aut, Distt. Mandi 1 6 Maharashtra Loni Kalbhor 1 7 Telangana Sulthanabad 1 8 Jharkhand Dharmabahal (T) 1 9 Meghalaya Sohkha 1 10 Uttarakhand Ranipokhri 1 Total 19 State wise clusters where more than 60% Utilization of 2nd installment achieved needs to expedite spatial plan submission S. No. State Name of cluster No. of Clusters Badekapsi, Bhanwarpur, Hardibazar, Jetha, Kunda, Loharsi, 1 Chhattisgarh Mudpal, Murmunda, Raghunathpur, Sonhat 10

Araku Valley, Kambadu, Kuppam, Singarayakonda, 2 Andhra Pradesh Venkatachalam 5

Puthenvelikkara - Kunnukara, Vellanad - Aryanad, Mangattidam - 3 Kerala Kottayam, Puthupally - Manarcadu 4 4 Telangana Allapur.S, Chirrakunta, Jukkal, Ryakal 4 5 Uttar Pradesh Chitehara, Patehara Kalan, Juggaur 3 6 Tamil Nadu Madukkarai, Suthamali 2 7 Tripura Nirbhoypur, Hrishyamukh 2 8 Arunachal Pradesh Tuting 1 9 Himachal Pradesh Sangla 1 10 Manipur Khangabok 1 11 Meghalaya Chisim Apal 1 12 Mizoram Aibawk 1 13 Nagaland Pedi (Ngwalwa) 1 14 Odisha Utkela 1 15 Sikkim Namcheybong 1 Total 38 Geo – Spatial Planning 30th and 31st October Workshop for pilot States 2019 Andhra Pradesh, Telangana, Odisha, Manipur and Tamil Nadu presented their Draft Spatial Plans Kambadur Cluster, AP

Kuthambakkam Cluster, TN Jan – Feb Trainings for supporting States/UTs Geo – Spatial Plan Preparation in Mission Mode Training as per States Status Person to attend State/UTs Tentative Dates Training 1: Uttar Pradesh, Mizoram, Tripura, 7th – 11th States/ UTs where Data collection Planner & GIS Expert Gujarat, Sikkim, Meghalaya, Kerala January 2019 ongoing Training 2: Manipur, Andhra Pradesh, Telangana, 20th – 22th States/ UTs where Spatial Plan Planners & Decision Makers Tamil Nadu, Odisha, Chhattisgarh January 2019 preparation in progress Training 3: State Nodal Officer, Planners, States/ UTs where Planning Punjab, Ladakh, Himanchal Pradesh, 3rd – 7th Rural Development & GIS Notification done. Spatial Uttarakhand, Rajasthan, Daman & Diu February 2019 experts Planning progress awaited

Training 4: Decision Makers and State Madhya Pradesh, Bihar, Jharkhand, West 10th – 11th States/ UTs where Planning Nodal Officer, GIS and data Bengal, Karnataka February 2019 Notification Awaited Collection officer

Training 5: Decision Makers and State Assam, Nagaland, Haryana, Jammu & 12th – 14th States/ UTs where Planning Nodal Officer, GIS and data Kashmir, Maharashtra, Goa February 2019 Notification Awaited Collection officer Parameters being used to track State/UT progress March 2020 Aspirational Map – All States/UTs in Mission’s original duration green category ending on 31st March 2020 Action Points from Jan - March • Approval of 12 pending ICAPs • Approval of 55 pending DPRs • Pending 112 clusters planning notifications • 100% DPRs entry in RurbanSoft MIS

• All States/UTs successfully onboarded on PFMS • At-least 1 Spatial Plan prepared / under process by every State/UT • Focus on potential 2nd & 3rd Instalment releases & Expenditure specially that of CGF Rank State Name Score 1 CHHATTISGARH 77.73 2 TAMIL NADU 71.67 3 UTTAR PRADESH 64.10 13 MEGHALAYA 39.75 4 TELANGANA 63.97 14 KERALA 39.22 5 MANIPUR 63.38 DADRA AND 6 MIZORAM 55.23 15 NAGAR HAVELI 37.17 ANDHRA 16 UTTARAKHAND 36.54 7 PRADESH 51.11 17 NAGALAND 34.21 8 LADAKH 50.88 18 RAJASTHAN 32.92 9 ODISHA 47.73 19 PUDUCHERRY 30.64 10 SIKKIM 47.20 HIMACHAL 11 TRIPURA 41.39 20 PRADESH 30.16 12 PUNJAB 40.31 MADHYA 21 PRADESH 28.85 28 DAMAN AND DIU 19.10 22 GUJARAT 28.77 29 BIHAR 17.44 23 MAHARASHTRA 27.14 30 JHARKHAND 15.62 JAMMU AND ANDAMAN AND 24 KASHMIR 24.64 31 NICOBAR ISLANDS 13.36 ARUNACHAL 32 ASSAM 13.33 25 PRADESH 23.56 33 LAKSHADWEEP 10.00 26 KARNATAKA 22.98 34 GOA 7.50 27 HARYANA 21.58 35 WEST BENGAL 6.43 36 NCT of DELHI 5.00 National Workshop on Experience Sharing organized on 24th June

• Experiences shared by Elected representatives from Clusters: • Employment generation • Waste management • Other Infra. • Focus on: • SHG, FPO convergence • Sustainable O&M • Spatial planning ‘Integrated Cluster Development’ outcomes focus Suttamalli Cluster, Tamil Nadu Suttamalli Cluster •Women / Youth – more than 80% HHs provided skilling & employment opportunities • SHG led growth by MSME units and allied activities • 100% habitations provided with Basic and Social amenities

Rurban Cluster creating and contributing to Cleaner Air in and around NCR Use of Super / Happy seeders in Dhapali Cluster, Punjab

Before

After

93 Iron Removal Plant & piped water supply in Nirbhoypur Cluster, Tripura VO owned paver block unit, Mandir Hasaud Cluster, Chhattisgarh Cluster level Symposiums to attract Investment / Partnerships (Paheniya Cluster, Uttarakhand) Dedicated tourism activities focus, Namthang Cluster, Sikkim • Showcasing of Tourism Focused clusters @ Paryatan Parv 2019 • Himanchal Pradesh, Odisha, Karnataka, Sikkim, Uttar Pradesh and Uttarakhand Smart Classrooms across clusters in Uttar Pradesh Cashew Processing Unit, Thakurmunda cluster, Odisha 50 more Success Stories from clusters across Country on Rurban portal PERFORMANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING NASC Complex Pusa New Delhi 20 December 2019 1733 SAGY GPs across the country 240+ SAGY GPs across the country for 2019-20 As on 3 Jun As on 16 Progress Sl Parameter 2019 Dec 2019 since last PRC 1 2 3 4 5= (4-3) No. of GPs identified Saansad 1 1,483 1,493 10 under SAGY-I (2014-19) No. of GPs identified 1 240 239 Adarsh under SAGY-II (2019-20) No. of SAGY-I GPs that 2 1,286 1,324 38 Gram uploaded VDP No. of SAGY-I GPs that 3 updated the VDP 1,171 1,230 59 Yojana progress No. of projects planned in 4 67,892 69,879 1,987 SAGY-I VDPs An No. of completed projects Innovative Scheme 5 37,283 42,342 5,059 in SAGY-I VDPs by Ministry of Rural Development No. of in-progress 6 7,753 6,708 -1,045 projects in SAGY-I VDPs No. of SAGY No. of projects No. of projects No. of projects in- No. of projects yet to Sl State / UT GPs planned completed progress start Completion 1 Andaman And Nicobar 3 276 194 (70%) 54 (20%) 28 (10%) 2 Andhra Pradesh 65 1350 778 (58%) 88 (07%) 484 (36%) 3 Arunachal Pradesh 7 216 37 (17%) 27 (13%) 152 (70%) of projects in 4 Assam 35 2429 603 (25%) 464 (19%) 1362 (56%) 5 Bihar 82 4817 1718 (36%) 601 (12%) 2498 (52%) 6 Chandigarh 2 31 15 (48%) 2 (06%) 14 (45%) SAGY-I GPs 7 Chhattisgarh 44 3306 2090 (63%) 281 (08%) 935 (28%) 8 Dadra And Nagar Haveli 1 0 0 (00%) 0 (00%) 0 (00%) 9 Daman And Diu 1 52 32 (62%) 7 (13%) 13 (25%) 10 Delhi 13 0 0 (00%) 0 (00%) 0 (00%) 11 Goa 5 596 147 (25%) 33 (06%) 416 (70%) 12 Gujarat 75 1752 1598 (91%) 69 (04%) 85 (05%) 13 Haryana 32 1547 1010 (65%) 160 (10%) 377 (24%) 14 Himachal Pradesh 15 1291 461 (36%) 108 (08%) 722 (56%) 15 Jammu And Kashmir 14 917 444 (48%) 112 (12%) 361 (39%) 16 Jharkhand 51 4230 2061 (49%) 599 (14%) 1570 (37%) 17 Karnataka 57 10117 7396 (73%) 476 (05%) 2245 (22%) 18 Kerala 83 4570 2770 (61%) 739 (16%) 1061 (23%) 19 Lakshadweep 1 79 29 (37%) 36 (46%) 14 (18%) 20 Madhya Pradesh 68 2588 1782 (69%) 232 (09%) 574 (22%) 21 Maharashtra 136 7076 3106 (44%) 789 (11%) 3181 (45%) 22 Manipur 15 786 518 (66%) 210 (27%) 58 (07%) 23 Meghalaya 7 334 87 (26%) 87 (26%) 160 (48%) 24 Mizoram 5 511 346 (68%) 55 (11%) 110 (22%) 25 Nagaland 6 71 16 (23%) 14 (20%) 41 (58%) 26 Odisha 48 1091 379 (35%) 75 (07%) 637 (58%) 27 Puducherry 2 72 18 (25%) 39 (54%) 15 (21%) 28 Punjab 32 815 309 (38%) 145 (18%) 361 (44%) 29 Rajasthan 80 4595 2759 (60%) 526 (11%) 1310 (29%) 30 Sikkim 6 234 120 (51%) 49 (21%) 65 (28%) 31 Tamil Nadu 158 5283 5026 (95%) 188 (04%) 69 (01%) Completed >90% VDP projects 32 Telangana 46 1753 919 (52%) 204 (12%) 630 (36%) Completed 60-90% VDP projects 33 Tripura 4 159 86 (54%) 16 (10%) 57 (36%) Completed 20-50% VDP projects 34 Uttar Pradesh 270 6371 6132 (96%) 166 (03%) 73 (01%)

VDP completion <20% / to be reported 35 Uttarakhand 15 796 554 (70%) 50 (06%) 192 (24%) 1493 70111 43540 (62%) 6701 (10%) 19931 (28%) No of SAGY GPs for Sl State/UT % MPs identified 2019-20 IDENTIFICATION 1 Andaman and Nicobar Islands 1 100% OF SAGY GPs 2 Chhattisgarh 9 56% for 2019-20 3 Daman and Diu 1 100% 4 Gujarat 29 78% 5 Haryana 2 13% 6 Jammu and Kashmir 1 10% 7 Jharkhand 3 15% 8 Karnataka 9 23% 9 Kerala 21 72% 10 Madhya Pradesh 7 18% 11 Maharashtra 32 48% 12 Manipur 1 33% 13 Mizoram 1 50% 14 Nagaland 2 100% 15 Odisha 5 17% 16 Punjab 4 20% 17 Rajasthan 18 53% 18 Sikkim 2 100% 19 Tamil Nadu 35 64%

All Hon’ble MPs identified GPs 20 Telangana 6 25% 40-76% Hon’ble MPs identified GPs 21 Uttar Pradesh 49 44% 10-40% Hon’ble MPs identified GPs 22 Uttarakhand 2 25% Identification details yet to be uploaded for any Hon’ble MP Grand Total 240 31% Total Number No of SAGY- No of officers Sl State of MPs II GPs nominated State-wise nomination of 1 Chhattisgarh 16 9 8 Charge Officers for SAGY 2 Jharkhand 20 3 6 Training 3 Karnataka 40 9 21

4 Kerala 29 21 21

5 Madhya Pradesh 40 7 4 Nominations Pending from ● Andaman and Nicobar Islands 6 Maharashtra 67 32 29 ● Daman and Diu 7 Odisha 30 5 4 ● Gujarat 8 Punjab 20 4 6 ● Haryana ● Manipur 9 Rajasthan 34 18 16 ● Mizoram 10 Sikkim 2 2 2 ● Nagaland ● Tamil Nadu (Local elections) 11 Telangana 24 6 6 ● Uttar Pradesh 12 Uttarakhand 8 2 2

Total 771 240 125 108 Samanvay Converging Rural Schemes 223 Central Schemes 1806 State Schemes 109

○ Prioritise all major schemes in SAGY GPs ○ Efficient Convergence with different departments/ programmes with defined Recommendations timeline ○ Training for grass root level officers program implementing personnel on By convergence ○ Strict monitoring at district level is CRM necessary to speed up the work. ○ Requires rapport among elected representative, government functionaries and villagers

MAJOR STEPS ON SAGY DURING THE RECENT MONTHS

Letters from Letters from Monthly DO from Monthly review Hon’ble MRD Secretary, RD JS, SAGY with States over VC by JS

Two DO letters sent on SRD wrote to CSs on 9 Monthly progress Progress and other 11 Jul 2019 and 8 Oct Sep 2019 shared issues discussed

2019 to Hon’ble MPs

Orientation for Capacity Third National Training of newly elected Building of SToTs Level Committee Charge Officers Hon’ble MPs Meeting

Orientation Programme on 3 Dec Two rounds of training Attended by 13 On 23-24 Dec 2019 at at NIRD&PR during Ministries on 9 Dec NIRD&PR 2019 Uttarakhand and Sep-Oct 2019 2019 Andaman conducted

training in States Expectations from States

Identification Monitoring Capacity Building

Remaining Hon’ble MPs are to be SAGY as a regular agenda in all Charge officers to be appointed for all SAGY encouraged to adopt GPs under reviews GPs SAGY (2019-24) DC/DMs may conduct monthly Training of Charge Officers of SAGY-II GPs in Orientation Programme for Hon’ble review Dec 2019 at NIRD&PR, Hyderabad MPs in State

Envt creation Dev. Plan Documentation

Awareness generation, Evidence based Village Documentation and wide environment creation and social Development Plans dissemination of success stories mobilisation activities in the newly from SAGY GPs identified SAGY GPs Synergy with GPDP; Involve Mission Antyodaya facilitators

Leverage fund from CSR Hajipur Gram Panchayat, Alwar district, Rajasthan Adopted by Hon’ble MP of Lok Sabha, Col. (Retd) Rajyavardhan Singh Rathore Major initiatives: • Many water harvesting works • An open gym was established by the Olympian MP • Focus on improving school education • Overall development of the GP • Inter-village connectivity

Major reasons for success • Mobilisation of CSR funds from Power Grid Corporation • Effective convergence of Govt Schemes • Focus of district administration Rajanukunte Panchayat, Bangalore Urban district, Karnataka Adopted by Former Hon’ble MP of Rajya Sabha, Shri Rangasayee Ramakrishna Major initiatives: • Overall development under active leadership of Hon. MP • Equal importance to non-infrastructure activities. • Received ‘Best Child friendly Gram Panchayat in Karnataka’ award • Constituted various functional committees • Succeed in completing more economic development activities • Generated revenue from solid waste

management treatment and taxes 1 Major reason for success 1 4 • Efforts of Hon’ble MP,District Administration and the participation of the villagers • Numerous No Cost activities conducted • Taken several steps to raise its own revenue.

Baram Panchayat, Ranchi district, Jharkhand Adopted by Hon’ble MP of Rajya Sabha, Shri Parimal Nathwani Major initiatives:

• Overall development under active leadership of Hon. MP • Many infrastructural interventions were made in the GP in the form of approaching and connecting black top roads, Town Out Post Police Station • Gram Panchayat was declared ODF Major reasons for success • Regular monitoring by the Hon’ble MP and his team • Villagers as co-authors in the development story

1 1 5 Dhanirampur Gram Panchayat, Sepahijala district, Tripura Adopted by Hon’ble MP of Lok Sabha, Shri Sankar Prasad Datta Major initiatives: • The piped drinking water project had a major impact of virtually eliminating dysentery outbreak in the village • Quality upgradation of school education • Students started Judo classes in the village school

Major reasons for success • The Hon’ble MP identified the most backward GP of his constituency • The Hon’ble MP and his team spent time with villagers to prioritise projects • Many line departments focused on the GP only because of the adoption under SAGY Mathwar Gram Panchayat, Jammu district, Jammu and Kashmir Adopted by Hon’ble MP of Lok Sabha, Jugal Kishore Sharma Major initiatives: • Awareness camps on agriculture, health, child development, maternal care etc • Public service delivery campaign ‘Aapki Sarkar Aapke Dwar’ • KCC for every family • Promotion of Bamboo cultivation • Constructed 259 IHHLs under CSR

Major reasons for success • Frequent visits by the Hon’ble MP ensured follow-up measures • Ensured meaningful participation of villagers

THANK YOU !

Websites: Mahatma Gandhi NREGA : nrega.nic.in SPMRM : www.rurban.gov.in/rurbansoft SAGY : http://saanjhi.gov.in [email protected]

Mail id: [email protected]