DOCSLIB.ORG

Scottish Government Consultation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Scottish Government Consultation Jeff Gibbons Scottish Government 1B-North, Victoria Quay, Edinburgh EH6 6QQ 2 May 2016 Dear Mr. Gibbons, CONSULTATION ON DRAFT PROVISIONS FOR A WILD FISHERIES (SCOTLAND) BILL/DRAFT WILD FISHERIES STRATEGY Thank you for asking Scottish Natural Heritage to comment on the consultation on the draft provisions for the new Wild Fisheries Bill and the draft Wild Fisheries Strategy. As the reform process has entered the stage where the shape of the new management structure is now being determined, and draft provisions are now being considered, we look forward to continuing our engagement in the reform process. Our response to the consultation is attached at Annex A. If anything in this response requires clarification, please contact Professor Colin Bean in the first instance. Yours sincerely, Eileen Stuart Head of Policy & Advice Scottish Natural Heritage, Caspian House, 2 Mariner Court, 8 South Avenue, Clydebank, G81 2NR Tel 0141 951 4488 Fax 0141 951 4510 www.snh.org.uk ANNEX A Q1. Are you content with the structure and content of the draft National Wild Fisheries Strategy? The draft National Wild Fisheries Strategy is a high-level document which sets out the broad vision for the way in which wild fisheries should be managed in Scotland, the key overarching principles and a series of themed indicators for delivery. In particular, we welcome the desire to integrate this strategy with wider national obligations, such as delivery of relevant Natura and Water Framework Directive objectives. Explicit mention could be made of the need to adopt an ecosystem approach to the management of freshwater environments and the ecosystem services that they provide. The list of national processes could, therefore, also include a link to the Land Use Strategy 2016-2022 which was published earlier this year. More emphasis should be placed on sustainable exploitation of fish stocks in catchments which are well managed, not only for fish, but for the wide range of biota that they support and the ecosystem services that they provide. Mention, therefore, could be made of a wider range of relevant initiatives, such as the Scotland’s Biodiversity Route Map to 2020 and Flood Risk Management strategies. We strongly support plans, mentioned in Theme 2 (Science and research), to ensure that all data will be made publically available and accessible. There are a number of options available for achieving this, such as SE-Web, the newly developed Atlas for Scotland and the National Biodiversity Network, as well as the databases currently maintained by the Scottish Freshwater Fisheries Co-ordination Centre. These can contribute to the delivery the second overarching objective of the Strategy “Promoting an effective, evidence-based fishery management through integrated data gathering, research and dissemination”. This must be supported, however, by a nationally co- ordinated programme of data gathering, possibly through the development of a national fish monitoring strategy. Q2. Which of the current areas within the draft Strategy would you prioritise, and why? Theme 1 outlines the activities required to deliver the key objectives of the Strategy and include the development of a national approach to the protection of fish and their habitats; the identification of national and local priorities for management; the delivery of management and conservation plans; and enforcement. Greater emphasis, therefore, should be placed on the delivery of national objectives by the network of FMOs. Whilst the activities included in Themes 2 and 3 remain important components of a fully functioning evidence-based and well managed wild fisheries sector, the necessary building blocks for the new national structure are largely contained within Theme 1. 2 Q3. Do you agree with the proposed high level duties on Scottish Ministers? Yes - these are, as the draft legislation indicates, a high level commitment to promote the conservation of all species of freshwater fish and their fisheries, and to promote best practice in their management. In terms of the overall balance of powers and duties between the national and local functions, and in particular their role in the delivery of obligations under the Habitats Directive, the role of FMO’s will have as a Competent Authority under the Habitats Regulations (perhaps replacing the Competent Authority role that is currently held by District Salmon Fishery Boards) should be made explicit. Q4. Do you agree that the criteria set out in paragraph 31 are the correct criteria for identifying the number of FMAs? Yes, we agree that these are the correct criteria for identifying the number of FMA’s. We offer no firm view on the number and size of FMOs. However, as suggested in our response to the previous consultation Wild Fisheries Reform (6 August 2015), we suggest that these should be of a number and size that are manageable by the staff complement within each FMO. It is presumed that a relatively common structure and set of skills will exist within each FMO to ensure that each can consistently deliver its obligations and functions across its own area and in a manner comparable with others. A common structure or skill sets may allow an indicative cost per FMO to consider alongside resources available in a prospective FMA. Whilst we note that the potential number of FMA’s may range from 12-18, we suggest that consideration also be given to aligning FMA boundaries to the existing network of 11 Area Advisory Groups currently used by SEPA to manage delivery of WFD obligations in Scotland. Further analysis may reveal that AAG boundaries may not be the best option for developing FMAs at the desired scale, but could serve as a useful starting point. Q5. Do you agree that the legislation should not include a specific requirement to have an FMO in every part of Scotland? No, our repeated view is that fisheries management at a national and local level should cover the whole of Scotland. Again, in our response to the previous consultation on Wild Fisheries Reform, we stated that the FMO network should cover all of Scotland, including the Northern and Western Isles. We also stated in that response that gaps in coverage may impact the ability of the National Body to deliver its desired national and international reporting functions. This view supports those made in Recommendation 17 of the Thin Report which proposed that “The national unit should be required to ensure coverage of the whole of Scotland by a network of approved FMOs”. Whilst we recognise that not all FMAs may have an FMO in place within this first appointment process, we think it essential that full FMO coverage is achieved to ensure that all of Scotland’s valuable fish and fishery assets benefit from the advantages of the new system. We offer two prospective mechanisms by which full coverage could be achieved below. 3 If gaps in FMO coverage occur across Scotland, then consideration could be given to enlarging an existing FMO or developing a temporary working arrangement where neighbouring FMO’s work together to cover an area where an FMO is currently absent. Alternatively, if a gap in FMO coverage is evident after the initial FMO identification process then there could be an obligation or duty to fill this gap in the period before commencement of the next FMO appointment and plan preparation cycle. This would allow the benefits and advantages to local management to emerge but would not allow an ongoing situation where potentially important and valuable areas of Scotland’s national fish and fisheries resource do not secure the benefits and advantages that an effective FMO would bring. Q6. Do you agree with the proposed approach to designation of FMOs? Section 8(2) of the draft Bill makes provision for an FMO to be designated for more than one FMA. In line with our response to Q5 (above), we suggest that an option for an FMO to be designated to manage part of a neighbouring FMA, possibly in conjunction with other FMOs, could be included. It would, however, be important to ensure that the entire FMA is managed. We fully agree with the view that view of the Stakeholder Reference group and the wider fisheries stakeholder community that form should follow function, and that the structure of each FMO should be determined by the management issues that exist within each FMA, and its size. We note that the draft provisions neither require, nor preclude, FMOs from being constituted as charities. In our response to the consultation on Wild Fisheries Reform we indicated that, whilst charitable status offers the means of continuing on-the- ground conservation work which will help restore and protect the wider habitat, it remains unclear how such charities can carry out statutory duties (see response to Q3), and remain independent of Ministerial direction. Q7. Do you agree with the proposed approach and timeline for approval of local fisheries management plans? Yes, we agree that the timeline for submission of a local fisheries management plan to Scottish Ministers with a period of three months post- FMO designation, as detailed in Section 10 of the draft provisions, should be adequate. This anticipates, however, that ‘potential FMOs’ must provide an outline draft plan as part of the application process. This plan should already be set out in line with the priorities identified within the draft National Wild Fisheries Strategy. Clear guidance should, therefore, be given to ‘potential FMOs’ relating to the structure and content of such a plan at the earliest possible stage. This should include an assessment of any new plan against the conservation objectives for protected sites and species within the plan area, and take account of any plans or measures which are either scheduled or in place. Section 10 of the draft Bill states that an FMO should show how it, “has involved those appearing to it to have an interest in the management of wild fisheries in its Area in 4 the preparation of the Plan”.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Enforcement of Civil Judgements – Responsible Law Enforcement Authorities, Procedural Obstacles and Current Issues in Uganda
    Enforcement of civil judgements – responsible law enforcement authorities, procedural obstacles and current issues in Uganda By Elau Emmanuel* Abstract This paper gives an over view of the Execution process in Uganda. Execution is provided by law as a means to realise the fruits of judgment. The Civil Procedure Act and Rules made therein provide a seemingly well structured manner of executing any matters but this is marred by the legal gymnastics that fall in play hence causing unnecessary delays.There are various actors in the process of execution of which may not be ignored by parties to an execution. The court which passes the decree or the court to which a decree is sent for exe- cution plays a critical mandate in helping a successful litigant. The Advocates play the role of choosing the mode of execution, the attachable property and giving a helping hand to the bailiff in the process. The Bailiff whom the law demands should be one registered for that purpose is the foot soldier that carries out the actual execution. The Bailiff is assisted by the Police, Local Council authorities and the prisons authorities who hold the judgment debtor in custody. The principle judge of late has advised that courts should stop sending the judgment debtors to prisons in order to decongest them but again this destroys the very purpose of arrest and detention which is to scare the judgment debtor into paying the said sums of money demanded by warrant. A. Introduction Enforcement is the act of compelling observance of or compliance with a law in this case, civiljudgmentsthrough the process of Execution.
    [Show full text]
  • Of a Princely Court in the Burgundian Netherlands, 1467-1503 Jun
    Court in the Market: The ‘Business’ of a Princely Court in the Burgundian Netherlands, 1467-1503 Jun Hee Cho Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2013 © 2013 Jun Hee Cho All rights reserved ABSTRACT Court in the Market: The ‘Business’ of a Princely Court in the Burgundian Netherlands, 1467-1503 Jun Hee Cho This dissertation examines the relations between court and commerce in Europe at the onset of the modern era. Focusing on one of the most powerful princely courts of the period, the court of Charles the Bold, duke of Burgundy, which ruled over one of the most advanced economic regions in Europe, the greater Low Countries, it argues that the Burgundian court was, both in its institutional operations and its cultural aspirations, a commercial enterprise. Based primarily on fiscal accounts, corroborated with court correspondence, municipal records, official chronicles, and contemporary literary sources, this dissertation argues that the court was fully engaged in the commercial economy and furthermore that the culture of the court, in enacting the ideals of a largely imaginary feudal past, was also presenting the ideals of a commercial future. It uncovers courtiers who, despite their low rank yet because of their market expertise, were close to the duke and in charge of acquiring and maintaining the material goods that made possible the pageants and ceremonies so central to the self- representation of the Burgundian court. It exposes the wider network of court officials, urban merchants and artisans who, tied by marriage and business relationships, together produced and managed the ducal liveries, jewelries, tapestries and finances that realized the splendor of the court.
    [Show full text]
  • Enforcement Officers (Formerly Known As Bailiffs)
    BRIEFING PAPER Number CBP04103, 4 June 2021 Enforcement officers By Lorraine Conway (formerly known as bailiffs) Contents: Summary 1. Introduction to enforcement agents 2. Regulation of enforcement agents 3. Complaints about enforcement agents 4. Frequently asked questions 5. Where to get debt advice 6. Recent developments 7. Effectiveness of current regulation 8. Bailiff action during Covid-19 www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | [email protected] | @commonslibrary 2 Enforcement officers (formerly known as bailiffs) Contents Summary 4 1. Introduction to enforcement agents 5 1.1 What is an enforcement agent? 5 1.2 Types of enforcement agent 5 High Court enforcement officers 6 County Court bailiffs 7 Civilian Enforcement Officers 7 2. Regulation of enforcement agents 8 2.1 Overview 8 2.2 New national standards on enforcement 10 3. Complaints about enforcement agents 11 3.1 Is there a regulatory body? 11 3.2 Is there a general guide? 11 3.3 Who should I complain to? 11 3.4 Complaints about private sector enforcement agents 11 Certificated enforcement agents 11 High Court Enforcement Officers (HCEOs) 12 3.5 Complaints about court enforcement officers 13 County Court bailiff or civilian enforcement officer 13 3.6 Complaining to the creditor 13 3.7 Taking legal action 13 4. Frequently asked questions 14 4.1 When can bailiffs enter a property? 14 4.2 Are there any time restrictions? 14 4.3 Who can let a bailiff in? 14 4.4 Can bailiffs force entry? 15 4.5 How do you know it is a certificated bailiff and not a debt collector? 15 4.6 What belongings can a bailiff take? 15 4.7 Can bailiffs take other people’s belongings? 16 4.8 Can bailiffs take goods from outside of the home? 16 4.9 Are vulnerable people protected? 17 4.10 What fees can bailiffs charge? 17 5.
    [Show full text]
  • The Netherlands
    The Netherlands by Antonius I.M. van Mierlo, Professor of Law Erasmus University Rotterdam Department of Civil Law & Civil Procedure Law Attorney at Law, NautaDutilh Weena 750 3014 DA Rotterdam Telephone: +31 10 22 40 321 Fax: +31 10 22 40 006 and Bo Ra D. Hoebeke,* Attorney at Law NautaDutilh Weena 750 3014 DA Rotterdam Telephone: +31 10 22 40 340 Fax: +31 10 22 40 056 * The authors gratefully acknowledge the most valuable assistance of Ms. Kate Lalor, senior associate at NautaDutilh N.V., Rotterdam. NET-1 (Rel. 29-2010) The Netherlands1 General Introduction The following is an outline of various aspects relating to the enforcement of a foreign money judgment in the Kingdom of The Netherlands (hereinafter referred to as “The Netherlands”).2 The observations set forth below relate only to The Netherlands domestic law, including directly applicable European regulations,3 and to provisions of directly applicable treaties to which The Netherlands is a party. The most important provisions relating to arrangements between The Netherlands and other countries with regard to enforcement are laid down in the following European regulations: — the European Council Regulation (EC) number 44/2001 of December 22, 2000 on jurisdiction and the enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (hereinafter referred to as “EEX-Regulation”),4 also referred to as the Brussel I-Regulation, which entered into force on March 1, 2002 and replaced the “Brussels Convention” (dated September 27, 1968),5 1 Although the information provided in this report is believed to be accurate and reliable, the reader should be aware that it is of an introductory nature only.
    [Show full text]
  • Bailiff Deputy Sheriff
    BAILIFF DEPUTY SHERIFF STARTING PAY: $18.42/hour; $38,313/year; after first year: $18.86/hour; $39,228/year (base pay) JOB SUMMARY: Maintain order, opening and recessing court, and accompanying inmates to and from District Court, Criminal Court, or County Court at Law court. Provides security for the courthouse and participants. Awaiting or actively participating in FTO. May perform other related duties as required. Functions may vary by individual assignment. For full job description and/or to apply go to: https://www.co.hill.tx.us/page/hill.Jobs.Openings REQUIREMENTS • Must be at least 21 years of age; be a citizen of the United States AND possess a HS Diploma or equivalent • Must possess a valid state driver’s license and have a good driving record • Must possess Peace Officer TCOLE license • Ability to work various shifts, weekends and holidays • Must have the knowledge necessary to understand basic operational, technical, and office processes; • Must be able to perform defense tactics against individuals and frequently interact with hostile/combative people • Must meet all proficiency requirements per Texas Administrative Code Title 37, Part 7, Chapter 221, as well as completion of course #10999 (within 12 months of hire date). • Carefully observe incidents, accurately remembering names, faces, numbers, circumstances and places; • Make independent judgments and adopt quick, effective, and responsible courses of action at any time; • Prepare clear and comprehensive reports; • Effectively represent the Sheriff’s Office in contacts with the public and other law enforcement agencies; • Establish and maintain cooperative relationships with those contacted during the course of work; • Possess and maintain a positive attitude; • Required to occasionally work overtime – may include weekends and evenings; • Required to be bondable under the Sheriff’s Official Bond; • Required to participate in continuing education courses.
    [Show full text]
  • Court of Appeal Judgments Ireland
    Court Of Appeal Judgments Ireland go-as-you-please:Leslie recesses subversively. she inebriates Nittiest her HerculaneumJackson roughs acquiesces some misdeal too benignly? after single-entry Waldemar broadcast tattily. Raimund remains Of temple Court judges said that Northern Ireland's abortion law country not. The summit Court delivered its reserved judgment on the applicants' appeal on 9 March 199 and bow in the applicants' favour considering that the. Ombudsman's Decisions Decisions High Court Judgments Following many Court Judgments 2020 5 November 2020 Judgment of John O'Connell and the Financial Services and Pensions Ombudsman. 23 Is more foreign judgment enforceable if it is subject to appeal brought the. Foreign judgments in Italy civil and Simmons & Simmons. Latest Supreme Court Judgments com except refund the problem case know which. The Court customs Appeal recently delivered another important judgment in the. Put in ireland judgments of appeal may, including child protection from sinn féin confirmed that tend to its failure to hold office to agree on. Judgments Undoubtedly the biggest and best move set in London Legal 500 201 2 August 2020 Irish Bank Or v HMRC Court for Appeal Irish Bank. These are a protection of murder in another annulment of procuring attendance and reasonable period of university college cork, as defined in february following day. Because of appeal has a new date on any reference, file a way through hundreds of commerce are staffed to. Post-Brexit pinch points in UK-Ireland cross-border disputes. Court Of midnight The Irish Times. The court may be appealed to ireland when you from irish language in fact about? The judgment appealed to ireland that decisions which has exclusive: journals published by that.
    [Show full text]
  • GIN Members' Newsletter
    JUNE 2020 GIN Members' Newsletter ISSUE NO. 3 An update on key issues for in-house Counsel in Guernsey as at 8 June 2020 1 New Bailiff and Deputy Bailiff We couldn't really start off this newsletter in any other way than to celebrate the changing of Guernsey's judicial guard on 12 and 14 May 2020. With the retirement of Sir Richard Collas as Bailiff, Richard McMahon became the Bailiff at a ceremony beamed to the community from a sparsely occupied Royal Court using Microsoft Teams. However we are sure that the new Bailiff will forgive us if we trumpet the appointment of our own Jessica Roland as the island's first female Deputy Bailiff two days later on 14 May 2020. Jessica joined Ozannes (as it then was) in 1998, becoming a partner in 2005 and Managing Partner from 2013 until taking on her new role. She is well known for her expertise in employment law but, as was highlighted in her admission ceremony, she is a rarity at the Guernsey Bar in having such a wide spread of work experience - ideal for a judge. We wish her all the best in her new job but will of course miss her singing in the corridors….. 2 Business as Usual at the Royal Court With the arrival of Phase 4 of release from lockdown, the Royal Court is now operating close to normality:- • The Greffe and Court building are open from 9am – 4pm. • The HM Sergeant and HM Sheriff team are back at full service; • The backlog of criminal and civil litigation has started to be cleared - a Judge and three Jurats can sit and still observe social distancing – and parties who need hearings are getting them relatively quickly; • General Petty Debts will recommence on 11 June 2020 and Petty Debt Hearings started on 1 June 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • History of the French Notarial System
    HISTORY OF THE FRENCH NOTARIAL SYSTEM. In France every attempt to transfer any right or title to real property brings the parties into contact with a public function- ary who has no counterpart in the federal or state officialdom of this country. His title is "NOTARY." He has a professional and social standing all his own. His dignity is derived from his appointment by the President of the French Republic; his in- tegrity is assured by ample bond given for the faithful perform- ance of his duties; and the respect and esteem of his fellow- citizens arise from the fact that he plays an important role in almost every phase of the life of individuals from the cradle to the grave. To conceive even a most general idea of his office by using parallels in our own institutions one must group all or some part of the duties and functions of the old-time family lawyer, the former conveyancer or scribe whose vocation was that of draw- ing up legal instruments and passing upon titles to real property before the days of title and trust companies, recorders or regis- trars of deeds and mortgages, registrars of wills, or surrogates, notaries public, masters in chancery, commissioners of deeds, in- vestment agents, collectors of rents and other income, masters in partition, arbitrators, guardians, administrators, custodians of vital statistics, depositaries of public records, court clerks and other officials connected with the daily routine of men's affairs too numerous to be detailed here. The office of Notary is older than any other now connected with administration or jurisprudence in France.
    [Show full text]
  • Court Security and Bailiff Duties
    Model Policy for: Court Security and Bailiff Duties Effective: Revised: Rescinds: I. Purpose: The purpose of this order is to establish procedures to be used by sheriffs’ bailiffs in the performance of their duties. Pursuant to §30.15, Florida Statute, the sheriff is an officer of the court and the means by which judgments of the court are generally enforced. II. Distribution: Court services, Bailiffs and all supervisors. III. Policy It is the policy of the ______County Sheriff’s Office to provide security in the _____County courthouse, all courtrooms and judicial areas, in order to protect the integrity of the court, protect the rights of individuals before it, deter those who would take adverse action against the court or its participants and maintain the decorum of the court. IV. Definitions Bailiff: A sworn Deputy Sheriff who is assigned to the courthouse function for the purposes of maintaining the security and integrity of the judicial process including maintaining order in the court, carrying out the directives of the judicial officials, enforcing the laws of the state of Florida, moving inmates and detainees to and from proceedings and protecting courthouse staff from harm. (31.01A) Inmate/Detainee: A person who has been arrested, detained, in law enforcement custody pending arraignment, release, adjudication or transfer to another facility or jurisdiction. Holding area: Any approved locked area, space, or enclosure where an inmate or detainee is secured pending court action. (CFA) citations referred to in this policy refer to the standards established by the Florida Commission on Law Enforcement Accreditation. V. Courthouse Security 1 1.
    [Show full text]
  • To Apply for a European Order for Payment in the Netherlands
    NETHERLANDS To apply for a European order for payment procedure in the Netherlands Summary of the objectives and principles of the European order for payment procedure: In order to ensure swift and efficient recovery of outstanding debts, the European institutions adopted Regulation (EC) No 1896/2006 of 12 December 2006 creating a European order for payment procedure, which came into force on 12 December 2008. This procedure is uniformly applicable in the different Member States. It is autonomous, optional and additional to the national procedures. This European procedure does not substitute itself for the existing national procedures and is optional in consideration of the other existing European mechanisms – Article 1 (2): “This Regulation shall not prevent a claimant from pursuing a claim within the meaning of Article 4 by making use of another procedure available under the law of a Member State or under Community law ». Recital 9 of Regulation 1896/2006 states that its purpose “is to simplify, speed up and reduce the costs of litigation in cross-border cases concerning uncontested pecuniary claims by creating a European order for payment procedure, and to permit the free circulation of European orders for payment throughout the Member States by laying down minimum standards, compliance with which renders unnecessary any intermediate proceedings in the Member State of enforcement prior to recognition and enforcement”. The regulation in fact abolishes the exequatur: the order for payment is recognised and enforceable in all the Member States. Reminder of the general provisions of the Regulation: Article 24 - Legal representation Representation by a lawyer or another legal professional shall not be mandatory: (a) for the claimant in respect of the application for a European order for payment; (b) for the defendant in respect of the statement of opposition to a European order for payment.
    [Show full text]
  • Policy 10000 - Bailiff Procedures 10000 – Introduction
    Policy 10000 - Bailiff Procedures 10000 – Introduction Bailiffs are an integral part of the court team. They are the primary person for maintaining law and order within the courtroom and by their actions can greatly influence the efficiency and effective-ness of court operations. For that reason, the impression a bailiff creates in the minds of court officers and members of the public must be that of an objective, unbiased professional. Generally, the duties of the bailiff include providing security for the judge and court staff, escorting inmates, affecting the arrest of specified individuals and making appropriate contributions toward the court's work product. Included in that list, of course, is the bailiff's responsibility to assist in the organization and control of court operations. The information in this policy will address all aspects of the bailiff's involvement in court and inmate procedures, and will state the department's operating policies in those areas. This policy shall be made available to all new sworn employees and made available, upon request, to all sworn employees of the department who are assigned to a court facility. 10001 – Court Terminology and Definitions 10001.1 - Court Terminology a) Arraignment: When a person is accused of committing a crime, appears in court, advised of the charges and asked to plead “guilty or “not guilty.” b) Commissioner: A person chosen by the court and given the power to hear and make decisions in certain kinds of legal matters. Commissioners cannot sign search warrants and have limited power as opposed to a judge. c) Hearsay: A statement made out of court that is offered in court as evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted.
    [Show full text]
  • Court Security
    Court Security Court Security is mandated by law S.B. 42, Effective September 2017. The law required a Security Committee, chaired by the Presiding Judge, and is meant to establish policies and procedures necessary to provide adequate court security. Court Security Officers are required to hold a court security certification that must be completed by September 01, 2019. The Court Security committee includes: Judge: Daniel W. Pelech City Attorney: Kenneth Kvinta Mayor: Anita R. Rodriguez Court Officer: vacant City Manager: Kevin Coleman Court Clerk: Raquel Gomez Court Clerk: Jodie Garza Police Chief: Karl Van Slooten Bailiff: Yvonne Rodriguez Court Security Procedure: I. COURT SECURITY PROCEDURE When entering the door at the top of the stairs, everyone will have to be cleared by an officer with a metal detector. No objects that could be used as a weapon are allowed in the Courtroom. When entering the Courtroom, the Bailiff gives instructions of expected behavior. II. POLICY Proper security and decorum in the Municipal Court are necessary for the administration of justice and for the protection of Court personnel and the public. Regardless of the level of offense, Court hearings can be emotionally charged and decorum must be maintained. The Department provides officers to serve as Bailiffs for the Municipal Court to ensure the security of the Court and the protection of Court personnel and visitors. The Municipal Court has jurisdiction only over Class C misdemeanor offenses. The majority of business conducted relates to traffic offenses. III. PURPOSE The purpose of this policy is to establish guidelines and procedures for the decorum and security of the Municipal Court.
    [Show full text]