DOCSLIB.ORG

Resilient Livelihoods of Vulnerable Smallholder Farmers in the Mayan Landscapes and the Dry Corridor of Guatemala –Relive-Guatemala

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Resilient Livelihoods of Vulnerable Smallholder Farmers in the Mayan Landscapes and the Dry Corridor of Guatemala –Relive-Guatemala RESILIENT LIVELIHOODS OF VULNERABLE SMALLHOLDER FARMERS IN THE MAYAN LANDSCAPES AND THE DRY CORRIDOR OF GUATEMALA –RELIVE-GUATEMALA- DISCLOSURE DOCUMENT Annexes Page Annex 6: Environmental and Social Management Framework 2 Annex 7: Summary of Stakeholder Consultations and Participation Plan 152 Annex 8: Gender Analysis And Evaluation And Action Plan 184 May 22, 2020 Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. RESILIENT LIVELIHOODS OF VULNERABLE SMALLHOLDER FARMERS IN THE MAYAN LANDSCAPES AND THE DRY CORRIDOR OF GUATEMALA –RELIVE-GUATEMALA- 1 Annex 6: Environmental and Social Management Framework ___________________________________________ May 22, 2020 Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 2 PREFACE 1 This Environmental and Social Management Framework (ESMF) will be applied to all activities financed by the Green Climate Fund (GCF) for technical and / or financial support of the project, "REsilient LIVElihoods of vulnerable smallholder farmers in the Mayan landscapes and the Dry Corridor of Guatemala” (RELIVE). 2 The Project Steering Committee (PSC), the Technical Committee Project Management Unit (PMU) (housed in the FAO Office in Guatemala), is responsible for the general coordination of project activities. The respective Territorial Operating Unit (TOU) is responsible for the daily implementation of the specific subcomponents and ensures compliance with the ESMF, as well as the safeguard of related documents, including maintaining the appropriate documentation on the Project file for possible revision by the GCF. 4 | P a g e Table of Contents 1 Annex 6: Environmental and Social Management Framework ..................................... 3 2 PREFACE ......................................................................................................................... 4 3 List of Tables .................................................................................................................. 7 4 List of Figures ................................................................................................................. 8 5 ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................................. 9 6 SUMMARY ................................................................................................................... 11 7 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 15 8 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................ 17 8.1 The Problem at Hand .................................................................................................. 17 8.1.1 The Climate Problem for Food Security .............................................................. 17 8.1.2 The climate problem faced by coffee growers .................................................... 18 8.1.3 The Climate Problem Faced by Cacao Producers ................................................ 19 8.1.4 The Climate Problem, Water and Forests ........................................................... 20 8.2 Location ....................................................................................................................... 21 8.2.1 Methodology Used to Prioritize Work Areas ...................................................... 21 8.2.2 Prioritized Areas .................................................................................................. 22 A.1. Project objective ......................................................................................................... 24 8.3 Project Components ................................................................................................... 24 8.4 Beneficiaries ................................................................................................................ 34 8.4.1 General Description of the Beneficiaries ............................................................. 34 8.4.2 Estimated Quantity of Beneficiaries .................................................................... 34 8.4.3 Linkage of Beneficiaries and Activities in the Project Proposal .......................... 36 8.4.4 Criteria for selecting beneficiaries when implementing the project .................. 40 9 ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL BASELINE ................................................................... 43 9.1 Environmental Aspects ............................................................................................... 43 9.2 Social Aspects .............................................................................................................. 54 9.2.1 Alta Verapaz ......................................................................................................... 54 9.2.2 Baja Verapaz ........................................................................................................ 54 9.2.3 Petén .................................................................................................................... 55 5 | P a g e 9.2.4 Zacapa .................................................................................................................. 55 9.2.5 Chiquimula ........................................................................................................... 56 10 ANALYSIS OF NATIONAL POLITICAL/STRATEGIC AND LEGAL/REGULATORY FRAMEWORKS. 59 10.1 Guatemalan Legal / political framework ................................................................. 59 10.2 Institutional framework .......................................................................................... 63 10.2.1 General Institutional Framework related to the Project ..................................... 63 10.2.2 The National Development Council System ........................................................ 67 10.3 Other Initiatives and Projects linked to Climate Change in Guatemala.................. 67 A.1. Main Projects currently Implemented by FAO ........................................................... 68 10.4 Status of Climate Information ................................................................................. 74 10.5 Applicable Environmental and Social Safeguard Policies ....................................... 77 10.5.1 FAO Safeguards.................................................................................................... 77 10.5.2 GCF Safeguards (International Finance Corporation, IFC) .................................. 77 10.5.3 FAO Standards vs. IFC Performance Standards ................................................... 78 10.6 Summary of Objectives and Principles for Implementation of the Gender Action Plan 78 10.7 Summary of the framework for Developing the Plan for Indigenous Peoples ....... 79 11 STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT ..................................................................................... 80 11.1 Stakeholder consultation and participation, including indigenous peoples .......... 80 11.2 Disclosure ................................................................................................................ 80 11.3 Complaint and Grievance Mechanism .................................................................... 81 12 EXPECTED PROJECT IMPACTS ...................................................................................... 84 12.1 Risk Classification .................................................................................................... 84 12.2 Summary of the Project’s Environmental and Sociocultural Impacts .................... 84 12.2.1 Identification of the Project’s Environmental and Sociocultural Impacts .......... 84 12.2.2 Description of positive project impacts ............................................................... 92 12.3 Rating negative impacts .......................................................................................... 96 13 MITIGATION MEASURES & APPROACH TO ENHANCE POSITIVE IMPACTS ............... 105 13.1 Determining preventive, control or mitigation and/or corrective measures of each of the impacts identified. .................................................................................................... 105 6 | P a g e 13.2 Budget ................................................................................................................... 111 14 PRINCIPLES AND PROCEDURES TO MITIGATE IMPACTS FOR IMPLEMENTATION .... 114 14.1 Step 1: Defining Sub-Activities .............................................................................. 114 14.2 Step 2: Environmental and Social Risk Screening of Sub-Activities ...................... 115 14.3 Step 3: Environmental and Social Risk Management (Monitoring and Reporting) 116 15 BIBLIOGRAPHY ........................................................................................................... 118 16 Appendixes ................................................................................................................ 120 Appendix 6.1. Exclusion List of the RELIVE Project ............................................................. 120 Appendix 6.2: Chance find procedures ............................................................................... 121 Appendix 6.3: Environmental and Social Screening Form .................................................. 122 17 Annex 7: Summary of Stakeholder Consultations and Participation Plan ............. 152 23 Annex 8: Gender Analysis and Evaluation and Action Plan .................................... 184 3 List of Tables Table 1: List
Load more

Recommended publications
  • REPORT No. 28/16 CASE 11.550 REPORT on ADMISSIBILITY and MERITS MAURILIA COC MAX ET AL
    OEA/Ser.L/V/II.158 REPORT No. 28/16 Doc. 32 June 10, 2016 CASE 11.550 Original: Spanish ADMISSIBILITY AND MERITS MAURILIA COC MAX ET AL. (XAMÁN MASSACRE) GUATEMALA Approved by the Commission on June 10, 2016 158 Extraordinary Period of Sessions Cite as: IACHR, Report No. 28/16, Case 11.550, Admissibility and Merits. Maurilia Coc Max et al. (Xamán Massacre), XX. www.cidh.org REPORT No. 28/16 CASE 11.550 REPORT ON ADMISSIBILITY AND MERITS MAURILIA COC MAX ET AL. (XAMÁN MASSACRE) GUATEMALA JUNE 10, 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................................................................... 1 II. PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE COMMISSION ..................................................................................................... 1 III. POSITIONS OF THE PARTIES .................................................................................................................................. 2 A. The petitioners .............................................................................................................................................................. 2 B. The State .......................................................................................................................................................................... 3 IV. ANALYSIS OF COMPETENCE AND ADMISSIBILITY ...................................................................................... 4 A. The Commission’s competence ratione personae, ratione
    [Show full text]
  • Disaster Risk Programme to Strengthen Resilience in the Dry Corridor in Central America 1 DISASTER RISK in the DRY CORRIDOR
    Disaster Risk Programme to strengthen resilience in the Dry Corridor in Central America El Salvador-Guatemala Honduras-Nicaragua 2015-2018 ©FAO/Orlando Sierra ©FAO/Orlando CONTEXT Central America is one of the regions most vulnerable to disaster risks due to its geographical location, high climate variability, exposure to extreme hazards and the institutional and socio-economic weaknesses of its population. Agriculture and food and nutrition security face multiple threats that can cause damage and disrupt regular weather conditions. One of the areas most affected by extreme It is estimated that in Central America’s Dry hazards, in particular natural hazards, is the Corridor more than 1 million families rely on Dry Corridor. The term Dry Corridor, although subsistence farming. The levels of poverty and referred to a climatic phenomenon, has malnutrition are alarming and mainly affect an ecological basis and defines a group of rural populations and indigenous communities. ecosystems in the eco-region of dry tropical Most livelihoods depend on climate whereas the forests in Central America covering the lowlands percentage of producers of basic grains varies of the Pacific coastal area, and most of central from 54 percent in El Salvador and Honduras to pre-mountain region of El Salvador, Guatemala, 67 percent in Guatemala. Honduras, Nicaragua, Guanacaste in Costa Rica and Panama’s Arco Seco area. The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) – in collaboration with its Climate risks in the Dry Corridor are mainly partners and counterparts – is supporting the represented by recurrent droughts, excessive countries of the Dry Corridor in Central America rains and severe flooding affecting agricultural to increase the resilience of households, production, with greater intensity in degraded communities and institutions to prevent and areas.
    [Show full text]
  • ZAP GUATEMALA END of YEAR REPORT JANUARY 1, 2018 – DECEMBER 31, 2018 Recommended Citation: Zika AIRS Project (ZAP)
    The Zika AIRS (ZAP) Project Indoor Residual Spraying (IRS 2) Task Order Six ZAP GUATEMALA END OF YEAR REPORT JANUARY 1, 2018 – DECEMBER 31, 2018 Recommended Citation: Zika AIRS Project (ZAP). February 2019. ZAP Guatemala End of Year Report 2018. Rockville, MD. Abt Associates Inc. Contract No.: GHN-I-00-09-00013-00 Task Order: AID-OAA-TO-14-00035 Submitted to: United States Agency for International Development Submitted: February 14, 2019 Abt Associates Inc. 1 6130 Executive Boulevard 1 Rockville, Maryland 20852 1 T. 301.347.5000 1 F. 301.913.9061 1 www.abtassociates.com ZAP GUATEMALA END OF YEAR REPORT JANUARY 1, 2018 – DECEMBER 31, 2018 The views expressed in this document do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. 3 CONTENTS Contents Acronyms ii 1. Executive Summary ...............................................................................................................1 2. Progress and Outcomes.........................................................................................................2 2.1 Community Mobilization, Social and Behavior Change Communication .................. 2 2.2 Vector Control .............................................................................................................. 3 2.2.1 Larviciding and Source Reduction...................................................................................................3 2.2.2 IRS………… ......................................................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Guatemala: Zacapa
    BetterNDPBA solutions. Guatemala Final Report: Authors Fewer disasters. Safer world. Guatemala: Zacapa Image: Google 1 National Disaster Preparedness Baseline Assessment – Department Profile NDPBA Guatemala Report: Department Profile Department: Zacapa Department Capital: Zacapa Area: 2,691 km2 Zacapa is in eastern Guatemala and borders Honduras to the southeast. Excluding the highlands, the majority of the department’s climate is semi- arid, often going two months without rain. Crops include tomatoes, cantaloupe, tobacco, and sugar cane. 244,881 55.9% 2.8% 84.9% Population Population in Illiterate Adult Access to (2017) Poverty Population Improved Water Municipality Population Zacapa 77,092 Gualán 42,130 La Unión 34,345 Teculután 19,376 Rio Hondo 18,768 Estanzuela 12,444 Usumatlán 12,248 Cabañas 11,635 Huité 10,660 San Diego 6,183 Multi-Hazard Risk Rank: Very Low (22 of 22) Lack of Resilience Rank: Very Low (20 of 22) RVA Component Scores Table 1. Department scores and ranks (compared across departments) for each index Multi-Hazard Multi-Hazard Risk Lack of Resilience Vulnerability Coping Capacity Exposure Very Low Very Low Very Low Very Low Very High Score Rank (of 22) Score Rank (of 22) Score Rank (of 22) Score Rank (of 22) Score Rank (of 22) 0.293 22 0.395 20 0.089 21 0.396 20 0.607 3 2 NDPBA Guatemala Report: Department Profile Multi-Hazard Exposure (MHE) Multi-Hazard Exposure1 Rank: 21 of 22 Departments (Score: 0.089) Table 2. Estimated ambient population2 exposed to each hazard 0% 100% 0 People 259,306 People 0% 18% 0 People 46,040 People 1% 1,648 People MHE The Dry Corridor Located in Guatemala’s “Dry Corridor,” Raw MHE Zacapa department experiences extreme Relative MHE dry seasons, often going months without rain.
    [Show full text]
  • Cooperative Agreement on Human Settlements and Natural Resource Systems Analysis
    COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT ON HUMAN SETTLEMENTS AND NATURAL RESOURCE SYSTEMS ANALYSIS CENTRAL PLACE SYSTEMS IN GUATEMALA: THE FINDINGS OF THE INSTITUTO DE FOMENTO MUNICIPAL (A PRECIS AND TRANSLATION) RICHARD W. WILKIE ARMIN K. LUDWIG University of Massachusetts-Amherst Rural Marketing Centers Working Gro'p Clark University/Institute for Development Anthropology Cooperative Agreemeat (USAID) Clark University Institute for Development Anthropology International Development Program Suite 302, P.O. Box 818 950 Main Street 99 Collier Street Worcester, MA 01610 Binghamton, NY 13902 CENTRAL PLACE SYSTEMS IN GUATEMALA: THE FINDINGS OF THE INSTITUTO DE FOMENTO MUNICIPAL (A PRECIS AND TRANSLATION) RICHARD W. WILKIE ARMIN K. LUDWIG Univer ity of Massachusetts-Amherst Rural Marketing Centers Working Group Clark University/Institute for Development Anthropology Cooperative Agreement (USAID) August 1983 THE ORGANIZATION OF SPACE IN THE CENTRAL BELT OF GUATEMALA (ORGANIZACION DEL ESPACIO EN LA FRANJA CENTRAL DE LA REPUBLICA DE GUATEMALA) Juan Francisco Leal R., Coordinator of the Study Secretaria General del Consejo Nacional de Planificacion Economica (SGCNPE) and Agencia Para el Desarrollo Internacional (AID) Instituto de Fomento Municipal (INFOM) Programa: Estudios Integrados de las Areas Rurales (EIAR) Guatemala, Octubre 1981 Introduction In 1981 the Guatemalan Institute for Municipal Development (Instituto de Fomento Municipal-INFOM) under its program of Integrated Studies of Rural Areas (Est6dios Integrados de las Areas Rurales-EIAR) completed the work entitled Organizacion del Espcio en la Franja Centrol de la Republica de Guatemala (The Organization of Space in the Central Belt of Guatemala). This work had its origins in an agreement between the government of Guatemala, represented by the General Secretariat of the National Council for Economic Planning, and the government of the United States through its Agency for International Development.
    [Show full text]
  • Drought: the Silent Harm of Migration from Central America During the Period 1990 to 2019
    Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 25 June 2021 doi:10.20944/preprints202106.0612.v1 Articule Drought: the silent harm of migration from Central America during the period 1990 to 2019 Sazcha Olivera 1*, María del Pilar Fuerte-Celis 2 and Bernardo Bolaños 1, 1 universidad Autónoma Metropolitana 1; [email protected]; [email protected] 2 Centro de Investigación en Ciencias de la Información Geoespacial (Centro Geo); [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: (52 5535705169) Abstract: The worldwide number of migrants has had a rapid increase during the last fifteen years. Despite the extensive research studies that elucidate the in- crease in migrants' recipient countries, we know little about the relationship be- tween the climate factors and human mobility in the countries of origin. Hence, this study focuses on the effects of weather and the propensity of individuals to leave a territory by measuring the importance of rain precipitation or the lack of it in one of the critical food corridors of Central America, formed by El Salvador, Honduras, and Guatemala. To study the mobility process, we develop a stochas- tic frontier model; the main result shows a greater propensity to migrate when there is a significant drought event in the place of origin. Some other factors that motivate people to leave their homeland are the effect of other climate events measured through the control system (ENSO), homicide levels, economic per- formance, and exchange rate. The findings allow differentiating between drought and excess precipitation on a population and mobility to other territories. In ad- dition, these results permit us to derive observable implications of the different effects of flooding and drought and create public policies of prevention, mitiga- tion, and resilience.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 10 25 Frontlinedefender
    InterReligious Task Force on Central America 3606 Bridge Avenue, Cleveland, Ohio 44113 I R T F tel: 216.961.0003 fax: 216.961.0002 e-mail: [email protected] via fax: 011 502 2411 8168 via fax: 011 502 2413 8658 Estimada Físcal Thelma Aldana Hernández Mauricio López Bonilla Attorney General of Guatemala Minister of the Interior October 25, 2014 Dear Attorney General and Minister of the Interior: We are extremely concerned about police repression against the Mayan Q’eqchi indigenous communities in three municipalities (Coban, Chisec and Raxruha) in Alta Verapaz Department and the shooting deaths by police of Sebastian Rax Caal, Luciano Can Cujub and Oscar Chen Quej. The Mayan Q‘eqchi communities have been resisting the local construction of hydroelectric projects and expansion of oil palm plantations in Alta Verapaz. Forced evictions from farms in Santa Rita and Xalahá Cangüinic began in mid-August. In Monte Olivio, Cobán, three community leaders of the peaceful movement against hydroelectric projects, Carmen Hun, Isabel Choc and Obdulia Regina Ical Hun were arrested. On August 15, 1,600 Civilian National Police officers detained Rafael Chen and Carmen del Cid, two community leaders of the Mayan Q’eqchi in Raxruha. In reaction to these detentions people started protesting on the streets and blocked the roads. The Civilian National Police used excessive force against the protesters, raiding homes and physically assaulting demonstrators. People were forced to leave their homes and remain displaced. Forty people were detained, many others were injured and three people lost their lives: Sebastian Rax Caal, Luciano Can Cujub and Oscar Chen Quej were shot by the Civilian National Police.
    [Show full text]
  • WEEKLY EPIDEMIOLOGICAL RECORD RELEVE EPIDEMIOLOGIQUE HEBDOMADAIRE 15 SEPTEMBER 1995 ● 70Th YEAR 70E ANNÉE ● 15 SEPTEMBRE 1995
    WEEKLY EPIDEMIOLOGICAL RECORD, No. 37, 15 SEPTEMBER 1995 • RELEVÉ ÉPIDÉMIOLOGIQUE HEBDOMADAIRE, No 37, 15 SEPTEMBRE 1995 1995, 70, 261-268 No. 37 World Health Organization, Geneva Organisation mondiale de la Santé, Genève WEEKLY EPIDEMIOLOGICAL RECORD RELEVE EPIDEMIOLOGIQUE HEBDOMADAIRE 15 SEPTEMBER 1995 c 70th YEAR 70e ANNÉE c 15 SEPTEMBRE 1995 CONTENTS SOMMAIRE Expanded Programme on Immunization – Programme élargi de vaccination – Lot Quality Assurance Evaluation de la couverture vaccinale par la méthode dite de Lot survey to assess immunization coverage, Quality Assurance (échantillonnage par lots pour l'assurance de la qualité), Burkina Faso 261 Burkina Faso 261 Human rabies in the Americas 264 La rage humaine dans les Amériques 264 Influenza 266 Grippe 266 List of infected areas 266 Liste des zones infectées 266 Diseases subject to the Regulations 268 Maladies soumises au Règlement 268 Expanded Programme on Immunization (EPI) Programme élargi de vaccination (PEV) Lot Quality Assurance survey to assess immunization coverage Evaluation de la couverture vaccinale par la méthode dite de Lot Quality Assurance (échantillonnage par lots pour l'assurance de la qualité) Burkina Faso. In January 1994, national and provincial Burkina Faso. En janvier 1994, les autorités nationales et provin- public health authorities, in collaboration with WHO, con- ciales de santé publique, en collaboration avec l’OMS, ont mené ducted a field survey to evaluate immunization coverage une étude sur le terrain pour évaluer la couverture vaccinale des for children 12-23 months of age in the city of Bobo enfants de 12 à 23 mois dans la ville de Bobo Dioulasso. L’étude a Dioulasso. The survey was carried out using the method of utilisé la méthode dite de Lot Quality Assurance (LQA) plutôt que Lot Quality Assurance (LQA) rather than the 30-cluster la méthode des 30 grappes plus couramment utilisée par les pro- survey method which has traditionally been used by immu- grammes de vaccination.
    [Show full text]
  • Africa • Afrique America • Amérique Asia «Asie Africa «Afrique
    WEEKLY EPIDEMIOLOGICAL RECORD, No. 7,1 4 FEBRUARY 1992 • RELEVE EPIDEMIOLOGIQUE HEBDOMADAIRE, N" 7 ,14 FEVRIER 1992 the west with 660 cases per 100 000 population in the week Hans l'ouest, avec 660 cas pour 100 000 habitants au cours de la ending 26 January has reported a decrease to 560 cases. All semaine qui s'est achevée le 26 janvier, a rapporté une diminution influenza viruses isolated this season have been influenza A à 560 cas. Tous les virus grippaux isolés cette saison ont été des and all those further studied have been identified as in­ virus A, et tous ceux qui ont été étudiés ultérieurement étaient des fluenza A(H3N2). Influenza B has been diagnosed by direct virus grippaux A(H3N2). La grippe B a été diagnostiquée par detection of the virus antigen in a few cases. détection directe de l'antigène du virus chez quelques cas. United Kingdom (7 February 1992).' Influenza activity Royaume-Uni (7 février 1992).1 L'activité grippale a continué à continued on a low level throughout January. However, out­ un bas niveau en janvier. Cependant, des flambées ont été rappor­ breaks were repotted among the elderly in residential tées Hans des résidences pour personnes âgées et dans plusieurs settings and in several schools during the second half of the écoles dînant la seconde quinzaine du mois. Les écoles fournissant month. Schools providing data an influenza reported an des données sur la grippe ont signalé un accroissement de 9,2 à 29,4 increase from 9.2 to 29.4 cases per 1000 children during cas pour 1 000 enfants en janvier — bien au-dessus du taux moyen January — well above the mean rate of 5.2 for the season de 5,2 cas observé au cours des saisons précédentes; Sur 267 isole­ in previous years.
    [Show full text]
  • Baja Verapaz
    NOVIEMBRE 2013 BAJA VERAPAZ DEPARTAMENTO MUNICIPIO DIRECCION LUGAR TELEFONO NIVEL SECTOR NO. NOMBRE_ESTABLECIMIENTO 1 BAJA VERAPAZ CUBULCO EODP ANEXA A LA ESCUELA OFICIAL RURAL MIXTA CASERIO PATZULUP ALDEA LOS PAJALES PARVULOS OFICIAL 2 BAJA VERAPAZ CUBULCO CASERIO TURBALÁ, ALDEA GUATZILEP PREPRIMARIA BILINGUE OFICIAL COPB ANEXO A LA ESCUELA OFICIAL RURAL MIXTA CASERIO PIEDRAS BLANCAS, ALDEA 3 BAJA VERAPAZ CUBULCO PARVULOS OFICIAL COPB ANEXO A LA ESCUELA OFOCIAL RURAL MIXTA PATZIJON 4 BAJA VERAPAZ CUBULCO EODP ANEXA A LA ESCUELA OFICIAL RURAL MIXTA CASERIO CHITANIL, ALDEA PATZIJON PARVULOS OFICIAL CASERIO EL CARRIZAL, ALDEA EL 5 BAJA VERAPAZ CUBULCO PARVULOS OFICIAL EODP ANEXA A LA ESCUELA OFICIAL RURAL MIXTA CEBOLLAL 6 BAJA VERAPAZ CUBULCO EODP ANEXA A LA ESCUELA OFICIAL RURAL MIXTA CASERIO XUN, ALDEA LA LAGUNA PARVULOS OFICIAL 7 BAJA VERAPAZ CUBULCO EODP ANEXA A LA ESCUELA OFICIAL RURAL MIXTA BARRIO SANTIAGO PARVULOS OFICIAL INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE EDUCACION BASICA DE 8 BAJA VERAPAZ CUBULCO ALDEA PAJALES CASERIO CHIVAQUITO BASICO OFICIAL TELESECUNDARIA 9 BAJA VERAPAZ CUBULCO EODP ANEXA A EORM CASERIO PAMISCALCHE ALDEA LA LAGUNA PARVULOS OFICIAL CASERIO TALTIC PASUBIR LA 10 BAJA VERAPAZ CUBULCO ALDEA CANCHEL PRIMARIA OFICIAL EORM RINCONADA 11 BAJA VERAPAZ CUBULCO COLEGIO PARTICULAR MIXTO 'NUEVO AMANECER' BARRIO MAGDALENA PARVULOS PRIVADO INSTITUTO DE EDUCACION BASICA DE TELESECUNDARIA POR 12 BAJA VERAPAZ CUBULCO CASERIO LA ESTANCIA ALDEA LA LAGUNA BASICO OFICIAL AUTOGESTION 13 BAJA VERAPAZ CUBULCO COPB ANEXO A EORM CASERIO CHUACHACALTE
    [Show full text]
  • Hurricanes Eta and Iota on the Updated December 15Th, 2020 Segunda/Postrera Cropping Season in Central America
    SPECIALSPECIAL REPORT REPORT www.cropmonitor.orgwww.cropmonitor.org Impact of November Hurricanes Eta and Iota on the Updated December 15th, 2020 Segunda/Postrera Cropping Season in Central America Highlights • The start of the Segunda/Postrera agricultural season in Central America was generally favourable from August through October with above-average rainfall resulting in good crop development. • Crop conditions quickly deteriorated in November across parts of the region impacted by the passing of two Category 4 hurricanes, Hurricanes Eta and Iota. • The 2020 Atlantic hurricane season has been the most active ever recorded with 30 named storms, more than twice the long-term yearly average of 12, and the only season with two major hurricanes in November. This has resulted in one of the wettest October to November periods since 1981 across parts of Central America. • In early November, Hurricane Eta crossed Central America and affected an estimated 4 million people across the region as persistent rains and heavy winds resulted in flooding, landslides, and crop damage across Nicaragua, Honduras, El Salvador, and Figure 1. Crop conditions over Central America and the Caribbean as of November 28th, 2020. Source: GEOGLAM Crop Monitor for Early Warning December Bulletin Guatemala. th • Two weeks later on November 17 , Hurricane Iota made landfall over northern Nicaragua as a Category 4 hurricane, the strongest Atlantic hurricane this year, and extended along virtually the same path as Hurricane Eta (Figure 2). While Iota quickly degraded to a tropical depression, persistent rains and high winds exacerbated previous damage from Eta across Nicaragua, Honduras, and Guatemala. • Excessive flooding and considerable damage to standing crops and agricultural infrastructure have significantly decreased yield prospects for the Segunda/Postrera season crops (Figure 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Mayan Q'eqchi' Voices on the Guatemalan National Reparations
    The International Journal of Transitional Justice, Vol. 4, 2010, 4–25, doi: 10.1093/ijtj//ijp024 Advance Access publication: 9 December 2009 Life Is Priceless: Mayan Q’eqchi’ Voices on the Guatemalan National Reparations Program Lieselotte Viaene∗ Abstract1 Little in-depth research has been conducted on or attention paid to the experience and opinions of survivors regarding issues such as reparation, justice, reconciliation and truth in dealing with the aftermath of atrocities. Less still has been said of the way in which vic- tims’ identities impact on these views or are considered in the design of programs aimed at redress for past violations. This article focuses on Guatemala’s National Reparations Pro- gram (PNR) as critically viewed by Mayan Q’eqchi’ victims. The Q’eqchi’ are the second- largest Mayan group in the country and among the most severely affected by the internal armed conflict of 1960 to 1996. In Guatemala, the dominant culture is nonindigenous, al- though the majority of the population is indigenous Maya. This raises the complex issue of the actual and potential role of cultural context in dealing with grave human rights violations. In this regard, it is pertinent to establish how reparation is understood in differ- ent cultural contexts and to question how governmental reparations programs take these contexts into account. The results of extensive ethnographic field research conducted be- tween 2006 and 2009 reveal the need for a locally rooted and culturally sensitive PNR. Introduction We want the president to listen to us, that our words may reach him, that he may know what happened.
    [Show full text]