Active Tectonics, Earthquakes and Palaeoseismicity in Slowly Deforming Continents

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Active Tectonics, Earthquakes and Palaeoseismicity in Slowly Deforming Continents Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on October 1, 2021 Active tectonics, earthquakes and palaeoseismicity in slowly deforming continents ANGELA LANDGRAF1*, SIMON KU¨ BLER2, ESTHER HINTERSBERGER3 & SETH STEIN4 1University of Potsdam, Earth and Environmental Science, Karl Liebknecht Str. 24–25, Potsdam, Brandenburg 14476, Germany 2LMU Munich, Earth and Environmental Sciences, Luisenstr 37, Munich, 80333, Germany 3University of Vienna, Department of Geodynamics and Sedimentology, Althanstrasse 14, Wien, 1090, Austria 4Northwestern University, Dept. of Geological Sciences, 1850 Campus Drive, Evanston, IL 60208-2150, USA *Correspondence: [email protected] Gold Open Access: This article is published under the terms of the CC-BY 3.0 license. Palaeoseismic records and instrumental data from be unpredictable, as is typically the case for com- continental interiors increasingly show that these plex dynamic systems. In particular, some of our areas of slow strain accumulation are more subject instincts developed for plate boundaries may not to seismic and associated natural hazards than pre- apply within plates. In Australia, Clark et al. (2012) viously thought (Tuttle & Schweig 1995; Johnston note that ‘periods of earthquake activity comprising 1996; Johnston & Schweig 1996; Crone et al. 1997, a finite number of large events are separated by 2003; Camelbeeck & Meghraoui 1998; Camelbeeck much longer periods of seismic quiescence, at the et al. 2000; Rastogi et al. 2001; Singh et al. 2004; scale of a single fault and of proximal faults’. As a England & Jackson 2011). This book explores result, ‘assigning an “active/inactive” label to a some of the key issues arising in attempts to under- fault in a slowly deforming area based upon the stand slowly deforming areas. occurrence (or non-occurrence) of an event in the Earthquakes in slowly-deforming areas behave last few thousands to tens of thousands of years quite differently in space and time from those at is not a useful indicator of future seismic poten- plate boundaries, owing to the geometry of faults tial’ (Clark et al. 2011). Moreover, ‘it is debatable and the rate at which they are loaded (Fig. 1). Faults whether a “recurrence interval” on individual faults at plate boundaries are loaded at constant rates by applies’ (Clark 2003), so if the term is used to steady relative plate motion. Consequently, earth- describe the idea that large earthquakes are sepa- quakes concentrate along the plate boundary faults, rated by long time intervals, it does not imply that and show quasi-periodic occurrences, although the these intervals are similar and that the earthquakes actual temporal patterns are often complicated. The are quasi-periodic. At the deepest level, it may not apparent ‘gaps’ that appear will be filled in over be useful to think in terms of a classic seismic cycle time. However, in midcontinents, the tectonic load- in which strain accumulates steadily and is released ing is shared by a complex system of interacting by quasi-periodic earthquakes. In other words, ‘the faults spread over a large region, such that a large fundamental assumption of earthquakes occurring earthquake on one fault could increase the loading due to progressive strain build-up, and thus being rates on remote faults in the system. Because the in some way predictable in their periodicity, is not low tectonic loading rate is shared by many faults satisfied’ (Clark et al. 2015). in midcontinents, individual faults may remain dor- Where ‘recurrence intervals’ of ground-ruptur- mant for a long time and then become active for a ing earthquakes are on the order of thousands to short period. The resulting earthquakes are therefore tens of thousands of years, slip rates on individual episodic and spatially migrating (Li et al. 2009; faults are below or barely at geodetic measurabil- Stein et al. 2009). ity. Consequently, decadal geodetic or seismicity As a result, the precise future spatiotemporal records may not reflect long-term deformation behavior of large mid-continental earthquakes may and seismicity (Friedrich et al. 2003; Stein & Liu From:Landgraf, A., Ku¨ bler, S., Hintersberger,E.&Stein, S. (eds) 2017. Seismicity, Fault Rupture and Earthquake Hazards in Slowly Deforming Regions. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 432, 1–12. First published online September 20, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1144/SP432.13 # 2017 The Author(s). Published by The Geological Society of London. Publishing disclaimer: www.geolsoc.org.uk/pub_ethics Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on October 1, 2021 2 A. LANDGRAF ET AL. Fig. 1. Conceptual models for the difference between interplate (a) and intraplate or mid-continental (b) earthquakes. The plate boundary fault is loaded by steady relative plate motion, causing earthquakes are concentrated along the boundary. In mid-continents, slow far-field tectonic loading is shared by a complex system of interacting faults. Large earthquakes roam across widespread faults, as rupture of one fault zone may affect the loading on a distant fault. Modified from Liu et al. (2011). 2009; Stein et al. 2009). Even in areas with dense more occurs in extensive, tectonically active intra- space-geodetic coverage, the relationship between continental mountain belts or continental rift zones strain accumulation and strain release is poorly (Camelbeeck & Meghraoui 1996; McCalpin 2005; understood. Furthermore, records of historical seis- Zielke & Strecker 2009). If the resulting motion micity in these environments are too short to con- and deformation are large enough, such areas are strain the size of the largest possible earthquakes treated as diffuse plate boundary zones (Gordon & or their recurrence intervals (Schmedes et al. 2005; Stein 1992). Relatively recent historic occurrences Fa¨h et al. 2009). Even in densely populated regions of major earthquakes, some exceeding magnitude with long historical records, such as China or central 8, in low-strain regions of Central Asia or Mongolia Europe, earthquake catalogues do not cover more (e.g. Bogdanovich et al. 1914; Baljiinyam et al. than 1000 or 2000 years and thus, are not sufficient 1993; Schlupp & Cisternas 2007; Kalmetieva et al. to correctly assess how the seismicity and associ- 2009), provide the opportunity for detailed studies ated hazards vary in time and space (Stein & because they were reported, their effects were partly Mazotti 2007; Stein & Liu 2009; Liu et al. 2011). investigated only months afterwards and the rup- Liu et al. (2011) show that earthquakes in Central tures are still well preserved in the landscape. China have migrated over the past 2000 years, and Understanding these events that occurred unexpect- that no fault in this region has ruptured twice in this edly 150 and more years ago may lead to better time span. Accordingly, one of the most pressing assessment of where such earthquakes might strike and enigmatic problems in earthquake geology is in the future. assessing the spatiotemporal distribution of large Although seismic events in the interior of conti- earthquakes in low-strain (intraplate) regions. To nents and low-strain regions represent a small frac- extend the short records of seismicity, palaeoseis- tion of the total number of earthquakes and have mological and historical data are being used. lower magnitudes than the highest at plate bound- Although some seismicity occurs in cratonic aries, they pose a significant hazard to societies interiors (Crone et al. 1997; Clark et al. 2014), (England & Jackson 2011). Part of the reason is Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on October 1, 2021 INTRODUCTION 3 that many seismogenic sources in such settings were lost soon if not systematically collected and digi- unknown prior to rupture owing to a lack of expo- tized. Modern analyses have been performed on sure and thus were not included in hazard estimates. some historic seismograms (e.g. Schlupp & Cister- For example, the 2010 Canterbury (New Zealand) nas 2007; Kulikova & Kru¨ger 2015; Kulikova earthquake occurred on an unknown fault in a region et al. 2016), yielding estimates of magnitude, focal where no large historical earthquakes were known mechanism or other source parameters. Interest- (Gledhill et al. 2010), as did the 2012 Emilia earth- ingly, a new archive, reaching a few more centuries quake in the Bologna region, northern Italy (Alessio back, may be available. In this volume, Kru¨ger et al. 2010) and the 2012 Pernik earthquake in et al. (2015) combine magnetograms with seismic Western Bulgaria (Radulov 2012). Accordingly, records from 1889 and 1911 for new estimates of the numbers of fatalities reported from unexpected, the previously debated magnitude for an earth- moderate to large events in low-strain regions often quake in Central Asia. For yet older seismic events, exceed the death toll from earthquakes in high- macroseismic observations provide useful data. strain areas by multiples (Fig. 2). Where earthquake However, such observations are limited or might recurrence is short enough to be in human memory, be biased by population density, cultural and politi- prepared communities and safer infrastructure often cal changes, and other issues (e.g. Berberian 2014). reduce fatalities. Learning more about earthquakes Stein et al. (2015) and Zo¨ller et al. (2015) note in continental interiors and low-strain regions should the resulting difficulty in estimating how large the hopefully improve hazard assessments and achieve largest earthquakes to expect may be, which gives similar results. rise to uncertainties in hazard estimates. Zo¨ller et al. (2015) analyse the earthquake catalogue of Central Asia, derived from historically reported Types of slowly deforming regions and instrumentally measured data in the magnitude range between 4 and 8.3. They find high probabili- Papers in this volume address earthquakes and ties for occurrence of large magnitude events in deformation in slowly deforming regions world- short time intervals, even if such events are rare in wide. Such regions can be classified in several the catalogue and probably have not occurred within groups. One is stable continental regions of conti- the past c.
Recommended publications
  • Nureg/Cr-7238
    NUREG/CR-7238 Guidance Document: Conducting Paleoliquefaction Studies for Earthquake Source Characterization Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research AVAILABILITY OF REFERENCE MATERIALS IN NRC PUBLICATIONS NRC Reference Material Non-N RC Reference Material As of November 1999, you may electronically access Documents available from public and special technical NUREG-series publications and other NRC records at libraries include all open literature items, such as books, the NRC's Public Electronic Reading Room at journal articles, transactions, Federal Register notices, http://www. nrc. gov/reading-rm.html. Publicly released Federal and State legislation, and congressional reports. records include, to name a few, NUREG-series Such documents as theses, dissertations, foreign reports publications; Federal Register notices; applicant, and translations, and non-NRC conference proceedings licensee, and vendor documents and correspondence; may be purchased from their sponsoring organization. NRC correspondence and internal memoranda; bulletins Copies of industry codes and standards used in a and information notices; inspection and investigative substantive manner in the NRC regulatory process are reports; licensee event reports; and Commission papers maintained at- and their attachments. The NRC Technical Library NRC publications in the NUREG series, NRC Two White Flint North regulations, and Title 10, "Energy," in the Code of 11545 Rockville Pike Federal Regulations may also be purchased from one Rockville, MD 20852-2738 of these two sources. These standards are available in the library for reference 1. The Superintendent of Documents use by the public. Codes and standards are usually U.S. Government Publishing Office copyrighted and may be purchased from the originating Washington, DC 20402-0001 organization or, if they are American National Standards, from- Internet: http://bookstore.gpo.gov Telephone: American National Standards Institute 1-866-512-1800 11 West 42nd Street Fax: (202) 512-2104 New York, NY 10036-8002 http://www.ansi.org 2.
    [Show full text]
  • High-Resolution Spatial and Temporal Analysis of the Aftershock Sequence of the 23 August 2011 Mw 5.8 Mineral, Virginia, Earthquake
    High-Resolution Spatial and Temporal Analysis of the Aftershock Sequence of the 23 August 2011 Mw 5.8 Mineral, Virginia, Earthquake Author: Stephen Glenn Hilfiker Persistent link: http://hdl.handle.net/2345/bc-ir:107179 This work is posted on eScholarship@BC, Boston College University Libraries. Boston College Electronic Thesis or Dissertation, 2016 Copyright is held by the author. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0). Boston College The Graduate School of Arts and Sciences Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences HIGH-RESOLUTION SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL ANALYSIS OF THE AFTERSHOCK SEQUENCE OF THE 23 AUGUST 2011 Mw 5.8 MINERAL, VIRGINIA, EARTHQUAKE a thesis by STEPHEN GLENN HILFIKER submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science August 2016 © copyright by STEPHEN GLENN HILFIKER 2016 High-Resolution Spatial and Temporal Analysis of the Aftershock Sequence of the 23 August 2011 Mw 5.8 Mineral, Virginia, Earthquake Stephen G. Hilfiker John E. Ebel ABSTRACT Studies of aftershock sequences in the Central Virginia Seismic Zone (CVSZ) provide critical details of the subsurface geologic structures responsible for past and (possibly) future earthquakes in an intraplate setting. The 23 August 2011 MW 5.8 Mineral, Virginia, earthquake, the largest magnitude event recorded in the CVSZ, caused widespread damage and generated a lengthy and well-recorded aftershock sequence. Over 1600 aftershocks were recorded using a dense network of seismometers in the four months following the mainshock, offering the unique opportunity to study the fault structure responsible for the post-main event seismicity.
    [Show full text]
  • Source Zones, Recurrence Rates, and Time Histories for Earthquakes Affecting Kentucky (KTC-96-4)
    Commonwealth of Kentucky fred N. Mudge Transportation Cabinet Paul E. Patton Secretary of Transportation Frankfort, Kentucky 40622 Governor August 14, 1996 Mr. Paul Toussaint Division Administrator Federal Highway Administration 330 West Broadway Frankfort, KY 40602 Dear Mr. Toussaint: Subject: IMPLEMENTATION STATEMENT KYHPR 94-155, Evaluation and Analysis of Innovative Concepts for Bridge Seismic Retrofit This report is the first of three reports for the above referenced study. The objective of this study was to develop earthquake time histories for use in the design of transportation facilities throughout the commonwealth. In order to achieve this objective, the following tasks were defined: 1. definition and evaluation of earthquakes in seismic zones that have the potential to generate damaging ground motions in Kentucky, 2. specification of the source characteristics, accounting for the spreading and attenuation of the ground motions to the top-of-the-bedrock at sites in Kentucky, and 3. determination of seismic zoning maps for the commonwealth based on peak­ particle accelerations, response spectra, and time histories. These tasks have been addressed in the report entitled Source Zones, Recurrence Rates, and Time Histories for Earthquakes Affecting Kentucky (KTC-96-4). Seismic input data (time histories, response spectra, and surface accelerations) were generated for all counties in KENTUCKY TRANSPORTATION CABINET "PROVlDE A SAFE, EFFICIENT, ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND, AND FISCALLY RESPONSIBLE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM WHICH PROMOTES ECONOMIC GROWTH AND ENHANCES THE QUAUTY OF LIFE IN KENTUCKY:' "AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER M/F/D" Kentucky and have been included in this report. It should be noted that the seismic data is generated at the county seat and not at the county centroid.
    [Show full text]
  • Data for Quaternary Faults, Liquefaction Features, and Possible Tectonic Features in the Central and Eastern United States, East of the Rocky Mountain Front
    U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Data for Quaternary faults, liquefaction features, and possible tectonic features in the Central and Eastern United States, east of the Rocky Mountain front By Anthony J. Crone and Russell L. Wheeler Open-File Report 00-260 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards nor with the North American Stratigraphic Code. Any use of trade names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. 2000 Contents Abstract........................................................................................................................................1 Introduction..................................................................................................................................2 Strategy for Quaternary fault map and database .......................................................................10 Synopsis of Quaternary faulting and liquefaction features in the Central and Eastern United States..........................................................................................................................................14 Overview of Quaternary faults and liquefaction features.......................................................14 Discussion...............................................................................................................................15 Summary.................................................................................................................................18
    [Show full text]
  • 1 1 2 3 4 5 the MAGIC Experiment: a Combined Seismic And
    1 2 3 4 5 6 The MAGIC experiment: A combined seismic and magnetotelluric deployment to 7 investigate the structure, dynamics, and evolution of the central Appalachians 8 9 Maureen D. Long1*, Margaret H. Benoit2, Rob L. Evans3, John C. Aragon1,4, James Elsenbeck3,5 10 11 12 1Department of Geology and Geophysics, Yale University, PO Box 208109, New Haven, CT, 13 06520, USA. 14 2National Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower Ave., Alexandria, VA, 22314, USA. 15 3Department of Geology and Geophysics, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Clark 263, 16 MS 22, Woods Hole, MA, 02543, USA. 17 4Now at: Earthquake Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey, 345 Middlefield Rd., MS 977, 18 Menlo Park, CA, 94025, USA. 19 5Now at: Lincoln Laboratories, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 244 Wood St., Lexington, 20 MA, 02421, USA. 21 22 23 Revised manuscript submitted to the Data Mine section of Seismological Research Letters 24 25 26 27 28 29 *Corresponding author. Email: [email protected] 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 1 39 ABSTRACT 40 The eastern margin of North America has undergone multiple episodes of orogenesis and 41 rifting, yielding the surface geology and topography visible today. It is poorly known how the crust 42 and mantle lithosphere have responded to these tectonic forces, and how geologic units preserved 43 at the surface relate to deeper structures. The eastern North American margin has undergone 44 significant post-rift evolution since the breakup of Pangea, as evidenced by the presence of young 45 (Eocene) volcanic rocks in western Virginia and eastern West Virginia and by the apparently recent 46 rejuvenation of Appalachian topography.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report for Fiscal Year 2017
    This report covers the National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program (NEHRP or Program) activities during fiscal year (FY) 2017. It is submitted to the Congress by the Interagency Coordinating Committee on Earthquake Hazards Reduction (Interagency Coordinating Committee), as required by the Earthquake Hazards Reduction Act of 1977 (Public Law 95-124, 42 U.S.C. 7701 et. seq.), as amended by the National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program Reauthorization Act of 2004 (Public Law 108-360). The members of the Interagency Coordinating Committee are as follows: Chair Dr. Walter Copan Under Secretary of Commerce for Standards and Technology and Director National Institute of Standards and Technology U.S. Department of Commerce Mr. Peter Gaynor Acting Administrator Federal Emergency Management Agency U.S. Department of Homeland Security Dr. France A. Córdova Director National Science Foundation Mr. John Michael “Mick” Mulvaney Director Office of Management and Budget Executive Office of the President Dr. Kelvin Droegemeier Assistant to the President for Science and Technology and Director Office of Science and Technology Policy Executive Office of the President Dr. James F. Reilly II Director U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior Disclaimer: Certain trade names or company products may be identified in this document to describe a procedure or concept adequately. Such identification is not intended to imply recommendation or endorsement by any of the agencies represented on the Interagency Coordinating Committee on Earthquake Hazards Reduction, nor does it imply that the trade names or company products are necessarily the best available for the purpose. Table of Contents Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................................... i Section 1 – Introduction .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 88 Annual Meeting of the Eastern Section of the Seismological
    88th Annual Meeting of the Eastern Section of the Seismological Society of America October 23-26th, 2016 Reston, VA 88th Annual Meeting of the Eastern Section of the Seismological Society of America Acknowledgements The work of many people made this meeting possible and we are grateful for their contributions. These people include: Field Trip Leaders: J. Wright Horton, Jr., Steven Schindler, Terrence Paret Banquet Guest Speaker: Terrence Paret Abstract Submission and Registration: Bo Orloff, Sissy Stone, Nan Broadbent, SSA main office Budget and planning: Charles Scharnberger from the Eastern Section of SSA Graphic Design and Webmaster: Bo Orloff Jesuit Seismological Society Award Committee. Past meeting organizers, especially Steven Jaume, Chris Cramer, and Maurice Lamontagne. Many thanks to all the session chairs! Thomas Pratt, Oliver Boyd, and Christine Goulet Planning Committee Chairs Many thanks to our generous sponsors: 2 88th Annual Meeting of the Eastern Section of the Seismological Society of America General Information Meeting Theme: The 2016 Eastern Section meeting is titled “From the Mantle to the Surface” and is a joint meeting with the Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research (PEER) Center’s Next Generation Attenuation-East (NGA- East) project. It will include a combination of geophysical studies being carried out using the USArray and other ground-motion data in the eastern United States. Special sessions include crust and mantle studies utilizing USArray, studies of central and eastern U.S. faults, seismicity and ground motions, and the Next Generation Attenuation Project for Central and Eastern North America—NGA-East. NGA-East Special Session (Wednesday 8:30-12:00): The Next Generation Attenuation project for Central and Eastern North America (CENA), NGA-East, is a major multi-disciplinary project coordinated by the PEER.
    [Show full text]
  • Earthquake Hazard Studies in the Northeastern United States
    THE LAMONT COOPERATIVE SEISMIC NETWORK AND THE ADVANCED NATIONAL SEISMIC SYSTEM: EARTHQUAKE HAZARD STUDIES IN THE NORTHEASTERN UNITED STATES. Annual Project Summary October 01, 2003 - September 30, 2004 External Grant Award Number: 04HQAG-0115 Won-Young Kim Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University Palisades, NY 10964, USA Tel: 845-365-8387, Fax: 845-365-8150 E-mail: [email protected] URL: <http://www.ldeo.columbia.edu/LCSN> Program Element: Element II. Research on Earthquake Occurrence and Effects Key Words: Wave Propagation, Regional Seismic Hazards and Real-time earthquake information Investigations undertaken The operation of the Lamont-Doherty Cooperative Seismographic Network (LCSN) to mon- itor earthquakes in the northeastern United States is supported under this award. The goal of the project is to compile a complete earthquake catalog for this region to assess the earthquake haz- ards, and to study the causes of the earthquakes in the region. The LCSN now operates 40 seis- mographic stations in seven states: Connecticut, Delaware, Maryland, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania and Vermont. During October 2003 through September 2004, scientists and staff at the Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University (LDEO) satisfactorily carried out three main objectives of the project: 1) continued seismic monitoring for improved delineation and evaluation of hazards associated with earthquakes in the Northeastern United States, 2) im- proved real-time data exchange between regional networks and the USNSN for development of an Advanced National Seismic System (ANSS) and expanded earthquake reporting capabilities, and 3) promoted effective dissemination of earthquake data and information. A significant amount of associated research effort was related to determining seismic mo- ment tensor and focal depth of small to moderate-sized earthquakes in the eastern United States by using three-component, broadband seismic waveform data.
    [Show full text]
  • Alexander E.\(3Ates„ Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Doctor O
    Th;Tectonic Evolution of the Altavista area, I Southwest Virginia Piedmont bv Alexander E. \(3ates„ Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial Fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of Doctor oF Philosophy in Department oFGeologica1 Sciences APPROVED: ‘ " · · .. · L. Gläer III, Chairman; U h f A.@ewitt C. Simps"pUnw 1) ’ _. ..T.....‘*‘ ' K. A. Eriksson A. K. Sinha June 1986 Blacksburg, Virginia The Teetonic Evolution of the Altavista area, Southwest Virginia Piedmont n bv Alexander E. Gates L. Glover Ill, Chairman Department of Geological Sciences I (ABSTRACT) The Altavista area lies at the north end of a large area of continuous detailed mapping in the proposed westward thrusted Smith River Allochthon of the Southwest Virginia Piedmont. lt also lies at the south end of an area of continuous mapping in the central Virginia Piedmont. The stratigraphy of the Smith River Allochthon has not been related to any other in the Southem Appalachians. The units defined to the north of Altavista are Late Precambrian to Early Paleozoic in age and correlated to many other areas in the Central and Southern Applalchians. At Altavista the two stratigraphies merge and are correlatable. The Bowens Creek Fault, which bounds the west side of the Smith River Allochthon, separates blocks that contain the same stratigraphy. If allochthonous at all, the Smith River Allochthon has therefore not been thrusted any great distance. The rocks of the Smith River Allochthon have been metamorphosed to mid zlle to upper amphibolite facies conditions during the Taconic Orogeny whereas those of Central Virginia only acheived upper greenschist conditions during this event.
    [Show full text]
  • Earth Moves: Seismic Stations ™ EART 2 from the Geoinquiries Collection for Earth Science
    LEVEL Earth Moves: Seismic Stations ™ EARTH 2 from the GeoInquiries collection for Earth Science Target audience – Earth science learners Time required – 40 minutes Activity A case study in analysis, exploring the 2011 Virginia earthquake. Science Standards NGSS: MS-ESS2-1. Earth’s Systems. Develop a model to describe the cycling of Earth’s materials and the flow of energy that drives this process. Learning Outcomes • Students will triangulate the epicenter of an earthquake. • Students will rank earthquakes by magnitude. Level 2 GeoInquiry • A free school ArcGIS Online organization account. Instructors or students must be signed in to the account to complete this activity. Requirements • Approximately 0.75 credits will be used per person in the completion of this activity as scripted. Map URL: http://esriurl.com/earthGeoInquiry7 Engage Where are the nearest seismic stations to you? ʅ Click the link above to launch the map. ʅ In the upper-right corner, click Sign In. Use your ArcGIS Online organization account to sign in. ʅ With the Details button underlined, click the button, Content (Show Contents of Map). ʅ Ensure that only one layer is turned on: Global Seismographic Network. ʅ Use the Measurement tool to determine your approximate distance to the nearest seismic station. ʅ Identify two additional local seismic stations to be used if there was an earthquake in your region. Explore Is Virginia prone to earthquakes? – Although Virginia is not on an active tectonic plate boundary, earthquakes are possible due to ancient faults far beneath the surface. ʅ Above the map, in the Find Address Or Place field, type Virginia, USA and press Enter.
    [Show full text]
  • 91St Annual Meeting of the Eastern Section of the Seismological Society of America
    91st Annual Meeting of the Eastern Section of the Seismological Society of America November 3‐5th, 2019 The Ohio State University Columbus, OH 91st Annual Meeting of the Eastern Section of the Seismological Society of America Acknowledgements The work of many people made this meeting possible and we are grateful for their contributions. These people include: Field Trip Leaders: Derek E. Sawyer and W. Ashley Griffith. Banquet Guest Speaker: Brad Lepper. Budget and planning: Daniel Pradel, Derek E. Sawyer and W. Ashley Griffith. Abstract Submission web and logistics support: Rikki Anderson, Nan Broadbent. Registration: Peter Narsavage and the Central Ohio Section of ASCE. Program: Christine Goulet and Daniel Pradel. Student Grant coordination: Oliver Boyd. Jesuit Seismological Society Award Committee. Many thanks to all the session chairs! Daniel Pradel and Christine Goulet Planning Committee Chairs Many thanks to our generous sponsors! 2 91st Annual Meeting of the Eastern Section of the Seismological Society of America General Information Welcome to Columbus, Ohio! With a population of about 900,000, Columbus is Ohio’s most populous city and the state capital. The city’s Scioto Mile is a string of parks on both sides of the Scioto River, with a huge interactive fountain and trails. On the west bank, the COSI science center offers hands‐on exhibits and a planetarium. Downtown, the Columbus Museum of Art includes American and European paintings and a sculpture garden. The German Village area has restored brick houses built by 1800s settlers. More at www.experiencecolumbus.com. A great way to experience Columbus is to rent a bicycle, as there are numerous bicycle trails along the rivers, bike‐friendly communities, and connections to the hundreds of miles that form the state’s bicycle trail network (www.ohiobikeways.net).
    [Show full text]
  • North Carolina Geological Survey Division of Land Resources Geologic Hazard Map Series 2
    DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES NORTH CAROLINA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY DIVISION OF LAND RESOURCES GEOLOGIC HAZARD MAP SERIES 2 Map of Earthquake Epicenters in North Carolina and Portions of Adjacent States (1698-2006) !( !( !( !( !(!( !( By Randy Bechtel, Michael A. Medina, John G. Nickerson, Kenneth B. Taylor, Jeffrey C. Reid, Richard M. Wooten, Kathryn !(Snider and Timothy W. (Tyler) Clark !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( Introduction: !(!( !( !( 86°W 85°W 84°W 83°W 82°W 81°W 80°W 79°W 78°W 77°W 76°W !( 75°W !( !( !( !( !( !( !( _ Charleston Earthquakes are a common occurrence, and literally thousands of earthquakes are !( Frankfort !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( MARYLAND _ !(!( !( !( !( !( recorded each year around the world. We do not hear about most of them because (! !( !( !( !( 38°N 38°N !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( they are very small or occur in isolated areas where few people live. !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( WEST VIRGINIA !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( North Carolina has experienced the effects of earthquakes throughout its history. !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!( !( !(!( The large map shows earthquakes that have been recorded in and around our state !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!( !(!( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!( (!!( !( !( !( (! !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!( !( !(!( !(!( between 1698 and October 2006. Before seismic instruments were installed in the region !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(
    [Show full text]