DOCSLIB.ORG

Download Issue 25

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

PRINCIPIUM The Newsletter of the Initiative for Interstellar Studies Issue 25 | May 2019 ISSN 2397-9127 www.i4is.org ■ The State of the Art in Fusion Propulsion ■ Overview: TVIW 2018 Symposium ■ Second Foundations of Interstellar Studies workshop ■ Extreme Deep Space Exploration ■ Competition: From Apollo to the stars! ■ Progress & activity by i4is-US 2017-2019 ■ Fine Tuning Lasers: Project Dragonfly and Glowworm R O F ■ i4is Members Page and Become an i4is member E V ■ Interstellar News I T A I ■ News Features: T I N ■ Oumuamua, Project Lyra and ISOs I ■ Indian Anti-Satellite test ■ All Comets Great and Small S S ■ IAC 2018 - Swarm Systems T U D I E ■ i4is-US at annual MIT Beyond the Cradle event Scientia ad sidera ■ The Membership Team Knowledge to the stars Principium | Issue 25 | May 2019 1 CONTENTS The State of the Art in Fusion Propulsion 4 Editorial Overview: TVIW 2018 Symposium 9 Welcome to issue 25 of Principium, the quarterly Interstellar News 13 newsletter about all things interstellar from i4is, the Masters Collaboration with University of York 13 Initiative and Institute for Interstellar Studies. Breakthrough Discuss 2019 13 Our Introduction feature is The State of the Art in Searches for Galactic Stream Interstellar Asteroids 14 Fusion Propulsion, part 1 of an essay by Kevin i4is at the Royal Institution 2019 14 Schillo, University of Alabama Huntsville (page 4). Ciel et Espace on Hein-Baxter AI for interstellar 14 ISU/i4is Elective Module – Chipsats 15 Our front cover is a reminder of the recent first NASA Grant for Solar Gravity Lens Mission 15 imaging of a black hole, a visualisation of the photon trajectories which produced the image. Our Tau Zero Breakthrough Propulsion Study 15 back cover is an impression of the Large Synoptic More from Prof Claudius Gros on Genesis probes 15 Survey Telescope (LSST), a vital new tool in finding Human exploration beyond the Moon and Mars 16 incoming comets and interstellar objects. The Contact Paradox 16 David Hardy - Honorary FBIS 16 We now feature a table of contents which, as you see, range from the latest i4is work on our The i4is Members Page 17 Glowworm LEO laser-push demonstrator to an 2nd FISW workshop 18 introduction to the team which implemented our News Feature: Indian Anti-Satellite test 21 membership scheme. Become an i4is member 23 Extreme Deep Space Exploration 24 We announce the Second Foundations of Interstellar Competition: From Apollo to the stars! 29 Studies Workshop (FISW) 27-30 June 2019 (page 18). Also in this issue Patrick Mahon exhorts us to News Feature: Oumuamua, Project Lyra and ISOs 30 Become an i4is member (p23) and we have the first News Feature: All Comets Great and Small 35 i4is Members Page (p17) with a few examples of Progress & activity by i4is-US 2017-2019 38 the members-only content we have already made News Feature - IAC 2018 - Swarm Systems 40 available. And with the 50th anniversary of Apollo i4is-US at annual MIT Beyond the Cradle event 43 11, we announce a little Competition: From Apollo Tuning our Lasers: Projects Dragonfly and 48 to the stars! (p29). Our technical team reports Fine Glowworm Tuning our Lasers: News Feature - The Membership Team 51 Letter: ISOs - Warning from Oumuamua? 53 Updates on Project Dragonfly and Glowworm (p48) and the final item is a letter from T Marshall Membership of i4is Eubanks with a Warning from Oumuamua? (p53) Please support us through membership of i4is. The feature on Nomadic Planets is postponed to Join the interstellar community and help to reach next time when we will also have The State of the the stars! Privileges for members and discounts Art in Fusion Propulsion - Part 2, a News Feature: for students, seniors and BIS members. The Principium Team and Terry Regan's Mariner 2 All at i4is.org/membership. Spacecraft model - part 1: The research phase. Please print and display the poster on page 3 As always, comments on Principium, i4is and all (white background for easy printing and 80% matters interstellar are always welcome, discount for students). Other variants are all at - John I Davies, Editor, [email protected] i4is.org/i4is-membership-posters-and-video JOIN i4is at i4is.org/membership Keep in touch! Join in the conversation by following the i4is on our Facebook page www.facebook.com/InterstellarInstitute For Members of i4is Become part of our professional network on LinkedIn Members have access to - www.linkedin.com/groups/4640147 Networking - i4is.org/members/networking- Follow us on Twitter at @I4Interstellar opportunities And seek out our followers too! Contact us on email via [email protected]. Principium preprints- i4is.org/members/preprints Back issues of Principium, from number one, can be Videos - i4is.org/videos found at www.i4is.org/Principium More in The i4is Members Page - page 17 The views of our writers are their own. We aim for sound science but not editorial orthodoxy. Principium | Issue 25 | May 2019 2 JOIN I4IS ON A JOURNEY TO THE STARS! Do you think humanity should aim for the stars? Would you like to help drive the research needed for an interstellar future… … and get the interstellar message to all humanity? The Initiative for Interstellar Studies (i4is) has launched a membership scheme intended to build an active community of space enthusiasts whose sights are set firmly on the stars. We are an interstellar advocacy organisation which: • conducts theoretical and experimental research and development projects; and • supports interstellar education and research in schools and universities. Join us and get: • member exclusive posts, videos and advice; • free or discounted publications, merchandise and events; • advanced booking for special HQ events; and • opportunities to contribute directly to our work. To find out more, see www.i4is.org/membership 80% discount for full time students! Principium | Issue 25 | May 2019 3 The State of the Art in Fusion LEAD FEATURE Propulsion An Essay by Kevin Schillo, University of Alabama in Huntsville Kevin Schillo introduces and surveys fusion-based propulsion systems. There are many live concepts for fusion and many of them are applicable to spacecraft propulsion. Kevin has based this on the extensive literature search he did for a dissertation in support of his PhD research. This is the first of two parts. Part 2 will appear in Principium 26, August 2019. Introduction capabilities, the energy released by a fusion Since the discovery of the vast energy that can be system is significantly greater than what is released in nuclear reactions, scientists and engineers offered in fission. For this reason, fusion have developed concepts in which nuclear fission propulsion systems have been explored and fusion systems may be used for spacecraft extensively over the past several decades. propulsion. In a fission reaction, a heavy element In a fusion propulsion system, the plasma splits into lighter nuclei, releasing large amounts exhaust from fusion reactions can be of energy. In nuclear fusion, light nuclei are joined converted directly to thrust, eliminating the together to form a heavier nuclei. Both have been need to generate electricity that would be researched extensively for spacecraft systems. The needed for an electric propulsion system. A primary advantage that fission has over fusion is fusion system would be capable of sending a that fission systems may be used on spacecraft with spacecraft to the furthest reaches of the solar existing technology in the form of nuclear thermal system and possibly beyond far more rapidly or nuclear electric systems. While fusion propulsion than any other propulsion system that can be is currently beyond our current technological expected to be developed. Figure 1. Comparison of initial spacecraft mass in metric tons and transit times for roundtrip Mars mission, with the x axis showing transit time in years and the y axis showing the initial vehicle mass in low Earth orbit [1]. Principium | Issue 25 | May 2019 4 LEAD FEATURE Studies by Cassibry et al [1], Miernik et al [2], and Early History of Nuclear Propulsion Adams et al [3] in the 2000s and 2010s have shown One of the earliest nuclear propulsion concepts that fusion propulsion rapidly reduces interplanetary explored was Project Orion, in which a spacecraft trip times when compared to other propulsion carries a large number of nuclear explosives. The systems for spacecraft. This can be seen in figure explosives are ejected one at a time and detonated 1, which compares the initial spacecraft mass in at a certain distance from the vehicle. Plasma from low Earth orbit and the corresponding transit times the explosion impinges upon a pusher plate at the required for a roundtrip Mars mission for different spacecraft’s rear and propels the vehicle forward propulsion systems. It is extremely difficult for a [4]. A vehicle design concept for Orion [5] is shown chemical propulsion system to be used for a human in Figure 2. piloted mission due to the corresponding long During the 1970s, research done at the Los Alamos transit times. Nuclear thermal and nuclear electric National Laboratory investigated using a laser to propulsion systems could allow for two-year initiate fusion detonations in fuel pellets [6]. The manned Mars missions. A fusion propulsion system Los Alamos team also researched three different with specific powers of 1-10 kW/kg could enable designs for systems that would convert energy from roundtrip Mars missions lasting less than a year. a fusion explosion into propulsive thrust. The first Compared to other propulsion systems, fusion offers design was a pusher plate very similar to that which significant payload mass and short transit times. was investigated for Project Orion. For this design, Fusion propulsion has also been identified as an a fuel pellet is detonated at a certain distance attractive candidate for making interstellar missions from the spacecraft and a pusher-plate absorbs possible.
Recommended publications
  • Comet Interceptor: a Proposed ESA Mission to a Dynamically New Comet

    Comet Interceptor: a Proposed ESA Mission to a Dynamically New Comet

    EPSC Abstracts Vol. 13, EPSC-DPS2019-1679-1, 2019 EPSC-DPS Joint Meeting 2019 c Author(s) 2019. CC Attribution 4.0 license. Comet Interceptor: A proposed ESA Mission to a Dynamically New Comet Geraint H. Jones(1,2), Colin Snodgrass(3), and The Comet Interceptor Consortium (see www.cometinterceptor.space ) (1) UCL Mullard Space Science Laboratory, Holmbury St. Mary, Dorking, RH5 6NT, UK ([email protected]) (2) The Centre for Planetary Sciences at UCL/Birkbeck, London, UK (3) University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom ([email protected]) Abstract allow valuable multi-point measurements of the solar wind over different lengtH-scales as tHese craft In response to the recent European Space Agency’s separate. call for proposals for a Fast (F) Mission, a multi- spacecraft project has been submitted to ESA to For the comet encounter, the primary spacecraft, encounter a dynamically new comet or interstellar planned to also act as the primary communication object. SucH an encounter with a comet approacHing point for the whole constellation, would be targetted the Sun for the first time would provide valuable data to pass outside the hazardous inner coma, on the to complement that from all previous comet missions, sunward side of tHe comet. At least one sub-spacecraft whicH Have by necessity studied sHort-period comets would be targetted for tHe nucleus/inner coma region. that Have evolved from their original condition during The various component spacecraft will carry a range their time orbiting near the Sun. of miniaturised instruments for remote and in situ studies of tHe object’s composition, nucleus, coma, The mission’s primary science goal is to cHaracterise, and plasma environment.
  • Nasa Tm X-1864 *

    Nasa Tm X-1864 *

    NASA TECHNICAL. • £HP2fKit NASA TM X-1864 * ... MEMORANDUM oo fe *' > ;ff f- •* '• . ;.*• f PROPULSION • FOR *MANN1D E30PLORATION-k '* *Of THE SOEAE " • » £ Moedkel • - " *' ' ' y Lem$ Research Center Cleveland, Qbt® NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SFACE ADMINISTRATION • WASHINGTON, D. €, * AUCUST 1969 NASA TM X-1864 PROPULSION SYSTEMS FOR MANNED EXPLORATION OF THE SOLAR SYSTEM By W. E. Moeckel Lewis Research Center Cleveland, Ohio NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION For sale by the Clearinghouse for Federal Scientific and. Technical Information Springfield, Virginia 22151 - CFSTI price $3.00 ABSTRACT What propulsion systems are in sight for fast interplanetary travel? Only a few show promise of reducing trip times to values comparable to those of 16th century terrestrial expeditions. The first portion of this report relates planetary round-trip times to the performance parameters of two types of propulsion systems: type I is specific-impulse limited (with high thrust), and type n is specific-mass limited (with low thrust). The second part of the report discusses advanced propulsion concepts of both types and evaluates their limitations. The discussion includes nuclear-fission . rockets (solid, liquid, and gaseous core), nuclear-pulse propulsion, nuclear-electric rockets, and thermonuclear-fusion rockets. Particular attention is given to the last of these, because it is less familiar than the others. A general conclusion is that the more advanced systems, if they prove feasible, will reduce trip time to the near planets by factors of 3 to 5, and will make several outer planets accessible to manned exploration. PROPULSION SYSTEMS FOR MANNED EXPLORATION OF THE SOLAR SYSTEM* byW. E. Moeckel Lewis Research Center SUMMARY What propulsion systems are in sight for fast interplanetary travel? Only a few show promise of reducing trip times to values comparable to those of 16th century terrestrial expeditions.
  • The Solar System and Its Place in the Galaxy in Encyclopedia of the Solar System by Paul R

    The Solar System and Its Place in the Galaxy in Encyclopedia of the Solar System by Paul R

    Giant Molecular Clouds http://www.astro.ncu.edu.tw/irlab/projects/project.htm Æ Galactic Open Clusters Æ Galactic Structure Æ GMCs The Solar System and its Place in the Galaxy In Encyclopedia of the Solar System By Paul R. Weissman http://www.academicpress.com/refer/solar/Contents/chap1.htm Stars in the galactic disk have different characteristic velocities as a function of their stellar classification, and hence age. Low-mass, older stars, like the Sun, have relatively high random velocities and as a result c an move farther out of the galactic plane. Younger, more massive stars have lower mean velocities and thus smaller scale heights above and below the plane. Giant molecular clouds, the birthplace of stars, also have low mean velocities and thus are confined to regions relatively close to the galactic plane. The disk rotates clockwise as viewed from "galactic north," at a relatively constant velocity of 160-220 km/sec. This motion is distinctly non-Keplerian, the result of the very nonspherical mass distribution. The rotation velocity for a circular galactic orbit in the galactic plane defines the Local Standard of Rest (LSR). The LSR is then used as the reference frame for describing local stellar dynamics. The Sun and the solar system are located approxi-mately 8.5 kpc from the galactic center, and 10-20 pc above the central plane of the galactic disk. The circular orbit velocity at the Sun's distance from the galactic center is 220 km/sec, and the Sun and the solar system are moving at approximately 17 to 22 km/sec relative to the LSR.
  • Pulsed Fusion Space Propulsion: Computational Ideal Magneto-Hydro Dynamics of a Magnetic Flux Compression Reaction Chamber

    Pulsed Fusion Space Propulsion: Computational Ideal Magneto-Hydro Dynamics of a Magnetic Flux Compression Reaction Chamber

    Pulsed Fusion Space Propulsion: Computational Ideal Magneto-Hydro Dynamics of a Magnetic Flux Compression Reaction Chamber G. Romanelli Master of Science Thesis Space Systems Engineering PULSED FUSION SPACE PROPULSION: COMPUTATIONAL IDEAL MAGNETO-HYDRO DYNAMICS OFA MAGNETIC FLUX COMPRESSION REACTION CHAMBER by Gherardo ROMANELLI to obtain the degree of Master of Science at the Delft University of Technology, to be defended publicly on Friday February 26, 2016 at 10:00 AM. Student number: 4299876 Thesis committee: Dr. A. Cervone, TU Delft, supervisor Prof. Dr. E. K. A. Gill, TU Delft Dr. Ir. E. Mooij, TU Delft Prof. A. Mignone, Politecnico di Torino An electronic version of this thesis is available at http://repository.tudelft.nl/. To boldly go where no one has gone before. James T. Kirk ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First of all I would like to thank my supervisor Dr. A. Cervone who has always sup- ported me despite my “quite exotic” interests. He left me completely autonomous in shaping my thesis project, and still, was always there every time I needed help. Then, I would of course like to thank Prof. A. Mignone who decided to give his contribute to this seemingly crazy project of mine. His advice arrived just in time to give an happy ending to this story. Il ringraziamento più grande, però, va di certo alla mia famiglia. Alla mia mamma e a mio babbo, perché hanno sempre avuto fiducia in me e non hanno mai chiesto ragioni o spiegazioni alle mie scelte. Ai miei nonni, perché se di punto in bianco, un giorno di novembre ho deciso di intraprendere questa lunga strada verso l’Olanda, l’ho potuto fare anche per merito loro.
  • Breakthrough Propulsion Study Assessing Interstellar Flight Challenges and Prospects

    Breakthrough Propulsion Study Assessing Interstellar Flight Challenges and Prospects

    Breakthrough Propulsion Study Assessing Interstellar Flight Challenges and Prospects NASA Grant No. NNX17AE81G First Year Report Prepared by: Marc G. Millis, Jeff Greason, Rhonda Stevenson Tau Zero Foundation Business Office: 1053 East Third Avenue Broomfield, CO 80020 Prepared for: NASA Headquarters, Space Technology Mission Directorate (STMD) and NASA Innovative Advanced Concepts (NIAC) Washington, DC 20546 June 2018 Millis 2018 Grant NNX17AE81G_for_CR.docx pg 1 of 69 ABSTRACT Progress toward developing an evaluation process for interstellar propulsion and power options is described. The goal is to contrast the challenges, mission choices, and emerging prospects for propulsion and power, to identify which prospects might be more advantageous and under what circumstances, and to identify which technology details might have greater impacts. Unlike prior studies, the infrastructure expenses and prospects for breakthrough advances are included. This first year's focus is on determining the key questions to enable the analysis. Accordingly, a work breakdown structure to organize the information and associated list of variables is offered. A flow diagram of the basic analysis is presented, as well as more detailed methods to convert the performance measures of disparate propulsion methods into common measures of energy, mass, time, and power. Other methods for equitable comparisons include evaluating the prospects under the same assumptions of payload, mission trajectory, and available energy. Missions are divided into three eras of readiness (precursors, era of infrastructure, and era of breakthroughs) as a first step before proceeding to include comparisons of technology advancement rates. Final evaluation "figures of merit" are offered. Preliminary lists of mission architectures and propulsion prospects are provided.
  • Theory of Space Magnetic Sail Some Common Mistakes and Electrostatic Magsail

    Theory of Space Magnetic Sail Some Common Mistakes and Electrostatic Magsail

    1 Article MagSail after Cath for J 10 1 6 06 AIAA -2006 -8148 Theory of Space Magnetic Sail Some Common Mistakes and Electrostatic MagSail * Alexander Bolonkin C&R, 1310 Avenue R, #F -6, Brooklyn, NY 11229, USA T/F 718 -339 -4563, [email protected], http://Bolonki n.narod.ru Abstract The first reports on the “Space Magnetic Sail” concept appeared more 30 years ago. During the period since some hundreds of research and scientific works have been published, including hundreds of research report by professors at major famous universities. The author herein shows that all these works related to Space Magnetic Sail concept are technically incorrect because their authors did not take into consideration that solar wind impinging a MagSail magnetic field creates a particle m agnetic field opposed to the MagSail field. In the incorrect works, the particle magnetic field is hundreds times stronger than a MagSail magnetic field. That means all the laborious and costly computations in revealed in such technology discussions are us eless: the impractical findings on sail thrust (drag), time of flight within the Solar System and speed of interstellar trips are essentially worthless working data! The author reveals the correct equations for any estimated performance of a Magnetic Sail as well as a new type of Magnetic Sail (without a matter ring). Key words: magnetic sail, theory of MagSail, space magnetic sail, Electrostatic MagSail *Presented to 14th AIAA/AHI Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies Conference , 6 - 9 Nov 2006 National Convention Centre, Canberra, Australia. Introduction The idea of utilizing the magnetic field to aggregate matter in space, harnessing a drag from solar wind or receiving a thrust from an Earth - charged particle beam is old.
  • 9.0 BACKGROUND “What Do I Do First?” You Need to Research a Card (Thruster Or 9.1 DESIGNER’S NOTES Robonaut) with a Low Fuel Consumption

    9.0 BACKGROUND “What Do I Do First?” You Need to Research a Card (Thruster Or 9.1 DESIGNER’S NOTES Robonaut) with a Low Fuel Consumption

    9.2 TIPS FOR INEXPERIENCED ROCKET CADETS 9.0 BACKGROUND “What do I do first?” You need to research a card (thruster or 9.1 DESIGNER’S NOTES robonaut) with a low fuel consumption. A “1” is great, a “4” The original concept for this game was a “Lords of the Sierra Madre” in is marginal. The PRC player*** can consider an dash to space. With mines, ranches, smelters, and rail lines all purchased and claim Hellas Basin on Mars, using just his crew card. He controlled by different players, who have to negotiate between them- needs 19 fuel steps (6 WT) along the red route to do this. selves to expand. But space does not work this way. “What does my rocket need?” Your rocket needs 4 things: Suppose you have a smelter on one main-belt asteroid, powered by a • A card with a thruster triangle (2.4D) to act as a thruster. • A card with an ISRU rating, if its mission is to prospect. beam-station on another asteroid, and you discover platinum on a third • A refinery, if its mission is to build a factory. nearby asteroid. Unfortunately for long-term operations, next year these • Enough fuel to get to the destination. asteroids will be separated by 2 to 6 AUs.* Furthermore, main belt Decide between a small rocket able to make multiple claims, Hohmann transfers are about 2 years long, with optimal transfer opportu- or a big rocket including a refinery and robonaut able to nities about 7 years apart. Jerry Pournelle in his book “A Step Farther industrialize the first successful claim.
  • Magnetoshell Aerocapture: Advances Toward Concept Feasibility

    Magnetoshell Aerocapture: Advances Toward Concept Feasibility

    Magnetoshell Aerocapture: Advances Toward Concept Feasibility Charles L. Kelly A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Aeronautics & Astronautics University of Washington 2018 Committee: Uri Shumlak, Chair Justin Little Program Authorized to Offer Degree: Aeronautics & Astronautics c Copyright 2018 Charles L. Kelly University of Washington Abstract Magnetoshell Aerocapture: Advances Toward Concept Feasibility Charles L. Kelly Chair of the Supervisory Committee: Professor Uri Shumlak Aeronautics & Astronautics Magnetoshell Aerocapture (MAC) is a novel technology that proposes to use drag on a dipole plasma in planetary atmospheres as an orbit insertion technique. It aims to augment the benefits of traditional aerocapture by trapping particles over a much larger area than physical structures can reach. This enables aerocapture at higher altitudes, greatly reducing the heat load and dynamic pressure on spacecraft surfaces. The technology is in its early stages of development, and has yet to demonstrate feasibility in an orbit-representative envi- ronment. The lack of a proof-of-concept stems mainly from the unavailability of large-scale, high-velocity test facilities that can accurately simulate the aerocapture environment. In this thesis, several avenues are identified that can bring MAC closer to a successful demonstration of concept feasibility. A custom orbit code that dynamically couples magnetoshell physics with trajectory prop- agation is developed and benchmarked. The code is used to simulate MAC maneuvers for a 60 ton payload at Mars and a 1 ton payload at Neptune, both proposed NASA mis- sions that are not possible with modern flight-ready technology. In both simulations, MAC successfully completes the maneuver and is shown to produce low dynamic pressures and continuously-variable drag characteristics.
  • Arxiv:2005.12932V1 [Astro-Ph.EP] 26 May 2020 with Eccentricity, E = 1.2, ‘Oumuamua Encountered the Solar System with V∞ = 26 Km S

    Arxiv:2005.12932V1 [Astro-Ph.EP] 26 May 2020 with Eccentricity, E = 1.2, ‘Oumuamua Encountered the Solar System with V∞ = 26 Km S

    Draft version May 28, 2020 Typeset using LATEX default style in AASTeX63 Evidence that 1I/2017 U1 (`Oumuamua) was composed of molecular hydrogen ice. Darryl Seligman1 and Gregory Laughlin2 1 Dept. of the Geophysical Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637 2Dept. of Astronomy, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06517 (Received April 14, 2020; Revised May 22, 2020; Accepted May 28, 2020) Submitted to ApJL ABSTRACT `Oumuamua (I1 2017) was the first macroscopic (l ∼ 100 m) body observed to traverse the inner solar system on an unbound hyperbolic orbit. Its light curve displayed strong periodic variation, and it showed no hint of a coma or emission from molecular outgassing. Astrometric measurements indicate that 'Oumuamua experienced non-gravitational acceleration on its outbound trajectory, but energy balance arguments indicate this acceleration is inconsistent with a water ice sublimation-driven jet of the type exhibited by solar system comets. We show that all of `Oumaumua's observed properties can be explained if it contained a significant fraction of molecular hydrogen (H2) ice. H2 sublimation at a rate proportional to the incident solar flux generates a surface-covering jet that reproduces the observed acceleration. Mass wasting from sublimation leads to monotonic increase in the body axis ratio, explaining `Oumuamua's shape. Back-tracing `Oumuamua's trajectory through the Solar System permits calculation of its mass and aspect ratio prior to encountering the Sun. We show that H2-rich bodies plausibly form in the coldest dense cores of Giant Molecular Clouds, where number densities are of order n ∼ 105, and temperatures approach the T = 3 K background.
  • Future Space Transportation Technology: Prospects and Priorities

    Future Space Transportation Technology: Prospects and Priorities

    Future Space Transportation Technology: Prospects and Priorities David Harris Projects Integration Manager Matt Bille and Lisa Reed In-Space Propulsion Technology Projects Office Booz Allen Hamilton Marshall Space Flight Center 12 1 S. Tejon, Suite 900 MSFC, AL 35812 Colorado Springs, CO 80903 [email protected] [email protected] / [email protected] ABSTRACT. The Transportation Working Group (TWG) was chartered by the NASA Exploration Team (NEXT) to conceptualize, define, and advocate within NASA the space transportation architectures and technologies required to enable the human and robotic exploration and development of‘ space envisioned by the NEXT. In 2002, the NEXT tasked the TWG to assess exploration space transportation requirements versus current and prospective Earth-to-Orbit (ETO) and in-space transportation systems, technologies, and rcsearch, in order to identify investment gaps and recommend priorities. The result was a study nom’ being incorporatcd into future planning by the NASA Space Architect and supporting organizations. This papcr documents the process used to identify exploration space transportation investment gaps ;IS well as tlie group’s recommendations for closing these gaps and prioritizing areas of future investment for NASA work on advanced propulsion systems. Introduction investments needed to close gaps before the point of flight demonstration or test. The NASA Exploration Team (NEXT) was chartered to: Achieving robotic, and eventually, human presence beyond low Earth orbit (LEO) will Create and maintain a long-term require an agency-wide commitment of NASA strategic vision lor science-driven centers working together as “one NASA.” humanhobotic exploration Propulsion technology advancements are vital if NASA is to extend a human presence beyond the Conduct advanced concepts analym Earth’s neighhorhood.
  • Humanity and Space

    Humanity and Space

    10/17/2012!! !!!!!! Project Number: MH-1207 Humanity and Space An Interactive Qualifying Project Submitted to WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE In partial fulfillment for the Degree of Bachelor of Science by: Matthew Beck Jillian Chalke Matthew Chase Julia Rugo Professor Mayer H. Humi, Project Advisor Abstract Our IQP investigates the possible functionality of another celestial body as an alternate home for mankind. This project explores the necessary technological advances for moving forward into the future of space travel and human development on the Moon and Mars. Mars is the optimal candidate for future human colonization and a stepping stone towards humanity’s expansion into outer space. Our group concluded space travel and interplanetary exploration is possible, however international political cooperation and stability is necessary for such accomplishments. 2 Executive Summary This report provides insight into extraterrestrial exploration and colonization with regards to technology and human biology. Multiple locations have been taken into consideration for potential development, with such qualifying specifications as resources, atmospheric conditions, hazards, and the environment. Methods of analysis include essential research through online media and library resources, an interview with NASA about the upcoming Curiosity mission to Mars, and the assessment of data through mathematical equations. Our findings concerning the human aspect of space exploration state that humanity is not yet ready politically and will not be able to biologically withstand the hazards of long-term space travel. Additionally, in the field of robotics, we have the necessary hardware to implement adequate operational systems yet humanity lacks the software to implement rudimentary Artificial Intelligence. Findings regarding the physics behind rocketry and space navigation have revealed that the science of spacecraft is well-established.
  • Espinsights the Global Space Activity Monitor

    Espinsights the Global Space Activity Monitor

    ESPInsights The Global Space Activity Monitor Issue 2 May–June 2019 CONTENTS FOCUS ..................................................................................................................... 1 European industrial leadership at stake ............................................................................ 1 SPACE POLICY AND PROGRAMMES .................................................................................... 2 EUROPE ................................................................................................................. 2 9th EU-ESA Space Council .......................................................................................... 2 Europe’s Martian ambitions take shape ......................................................................... 2 ESA’s advancements on Planetary Defence Systems ........................................................... 2 ESA prepares for rescuing Humans on Moon .................................................................... 3 ESA’s private partnerships ......................................................................................... 3 ESA’s international cooperation with Japan .................................................................... 3 New EU Parliament, new EU European Space Policy? ......................................................... 3 France reflects on its competitiveness and defence posture in space ...................................... 3 Germany joins consortium to support a European reusable rocket.........................................