DOCSLIB.ORG

Insecta: Trichoptera)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Insecta Mundi Florida March 1999 Nomenclatural and systematic changes in the Neotropical caddisflies (Insecta: richopterT a) Oliver S. Flint Jr National Museum of Natural History, Washington, D.C. Ralph W. Holzenthal University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN Steven C. Harris Clarion University, Clarion, PA Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi Part of the Entomology Commons Flint, Oliver S. Jr; Holzenthal, Ralph W.; and Harris, Steven C., "Nomenclatural and systematic changes in the Neotropical caddisflies (Insecta: richopterT a)" (1999). Insecta Mundi. 328. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi/328 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Florida at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Insecta Mundi by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. INSECTA MUNDI, Vol. 13, No. 1-2, March-June, 1999 73 Nomenclatural and systematic changes in the Neotropical caddisflies (Insecta: Trichoptera) Oliver S. Flint, Jr. Department of Entomology National Museum of Natural History Smithsonian Institution Washington, DC, 20560-0105 Ralph W. Holzenthal Department of Entomology 219 Hodson Hall, 1980 Folwell Ave. University of Minnesota St. Paul, MN, 55108 Steven C. Harris Department of Biology Clarion University Clarion, PA, 16214-1232 Recent work on a catalog of the Neotropical Murielia falls into synonymy. Phylloicus farri, caddisflies has resulted in the recognition of the however, does not belong to the same generic group need to make numerous lectotype designations, as the other two species currently placed in new names for homonyms, specific and generic Murielia. synonymies, transfers of species between genera and genera between families, and placement of acutiterga, Murielia, Denning and Hogue, in Den- many long ignored names of Muller and others. ning, et al. 1983, transferred to Banyallarga Rationales are presented for all actions, many of NavAs 1916. Correct name: Banyallarga acuti- which had been known for years as the result of terga (Denning and Hogue), new combination. examination of types, but no opportunity had arisen The synonymy of Murielia results in the need to to publish them, others became apparent as a result place its included species in other genera. This of the cataloging. This opportunity is taken to present species, known to us in all stages, is a rather all of those known to us to avoid having them hidden distinctive species of Banyallarga. in a general catalog. They are presented alphabet- ically by family and then alphabetically by the name fortuna, Murielia, Resh, in Denning, et al. 1983, of the species or genus requiring action. Acronyms transferred to Banyallarga Navhs 1916. Cor- of museums and collections cited in the text are rect name: Banyallarga fortuna (Resh), new detailed in the Acknowledgments. combination. As with B. acutiterga, this species also is correctly placed in the genus Banyallarga. Family Calamoceratidae Murielia Hogue and Denning, in Denning, et al. Family Ecnomidae 1983, synonym of Phylloicus Muller 1880a, new synonymy. Chilocentropus NavAs 1934. Type species: Chilo- When Murielia was erected, Phylloicus farri centropus disparilis NavAs (original designa- Flint was designated type species. Phylloicus farri tion). Transferred to Ecnomidae, new place- is a true species of Phylloicus and thus the genus ment. 74 Volume 13, No. 1-2, March-June, 1999, INSECTA MUNDI The true position of this enigmatic genus is very new combinations), and designate Antoptila problematical. Navks provided a figure of the fore- brasiliana Mosely, the type species of Antoptila and hindwing venation with the original description, (original designation) as type species of Itauara. but the sex and the disposition of the type were not stated (the assumption is that it remained in Navks' armata, Paraprotoptila, Jacquemart 1963, trans- personal collection and has subsequently been ferred toMexitrichia Mosely 1937. Correct name: destroyed). It was stated to be similar to the Mexitrichia armata (Jacquemart), new combi- Nearctic genus Phylocentropus, but the venation, nation. especially of the hindwing, is not congruent. Only The generic synonymy proposed below results two genera of psychomyoids (s.1.) are known from in the transfer of P. armata to Mexitrichia. Chile: Polycentropus and Austrotinodes. The genus Although no species is currently known from the Polycentropus has fork 1present in the hindwing, at region whose genitalia match the original figures, least in the Chilean species: this is lacking in the we have no hesitation in making the transfer. figure of Navks. The hindwing venation matches that of Austrotinodes perfectly. The forewing Paraprotoptila Jacquemart 1963, synonym of Mex- venation as shown is very peculiar, with 3 veins, all itrichia Mosely 1937, new synonymy. forked, arising from Rs, and M with only a single The putative type of Paraprotoptila armata fork. Nothing is known with this type venation. It Jacquemart was borrowed by Flint from IRSNB. A seems most probable that he somehow connected single slide, with mounting medium almost black, the anterior branch of M to Rs. The apical fork of was sent: it is labelled to the left "S. Jacquemart R2+3 could also have been another det., 196 Paraprotopti-la armata sp.n. [on the misinterpretation, this time of the apical fork of R1 bottom right corner of this label, a small red label] in A~xstrotinodes.If one thus mentally rearranges TYPE, and to the right "S.Jacquemart det., 196 the connections of the forewing forks, the total Argentine Rib sasso 11-IV-1959 I.G. 22893". Flint venation then agrees with Austrotinodes as does the searched the slide repeatedly both under dissecting given size and coloration. However, lacking any real and compound microscopes, including any medium proof of this scenario, we refrain from a formal that had oozed out around the cover slip, without synonymy, but do transfer the genus to the finding recognizable remains. The original figures Ecnomidae in the proximity of Austrotinodes. of the genitalia are typical of many species of Mexitrichia, which is also reasonable on zoogeographic grounds. Family Glossosomatidae primerana, Rhiacophila [sic], Weyenbergh 1881, Antoptila Mosely 1939, synonym of Itauara Miiller transferred to Protoptila Banks 1904. Correct 1888, new synonymy. name: Protoptilaprimerana (Weyenbergh), new The name Itauara was first used by Muller in combination. 1888 without included species or illustrations, but Weyenbergh's description of the larva, pupa later (1921, fig. 173 lower) he gave a surprisingly and case of R. primerana is almost assuredly that of accurate figure of the forewing venation of the a protoptiline glossosomatid, as was also concluded female Itauara. Four genera of protoptiline by Ulmer (1957, p. 156). The figures of the larva (fig. glossoson~atids are currently recognized from 5), case (figs. 3,4), and apex of the abdomen (fig. 10) southeaster11 Brazil: Antoptila, Canoptila, are all typical of glossosomatids. The figures of the Mexitrichia, and Protoptila. The venation of head (fig. 9), larva in case (fig. 8) and wings (fig. 13) Itauara matches almost perfectly that of Antoptila are all pure fantasy. His given length of the larva, 6 and none of the others, as already noted by Ulmer mm, and length of d', 4 mm, 9, 5 mm, are also (1957). All the figures and descriptions of cases and concordant with a protoptiline, but the wingspreads larval parts in the various works of Muller are of of the 5, 14 mm, 9, 16 mm are out of proportion some protoptiline and fully compatible with, but not (perhaps the 1was inserted before the 4 and 6 by the diagnostic for, Antoptila. We thus synonylnize the printer). In all the records Flint has of caddisflies two genera. No species has ever been placed in from Cordoba, the only glossosomatid is Protoptila Itauara; we transfer the species I. brasiliana dubitans Mosely. Lacking any typical material we (Mosely), I. plaumanni (Flint), I. guarani hesitate to synonymize the two species, but do place (Angrisano), and I. amazonica (Flint) to Itauara (all INSECTA MUNDI, Vol. 13, No. 1-2, March-June, 1999 75 R. primerana in the genus Protoptila where it most schmidi, Atopsyche, Sykora 1991, junior homonym likely belongs. of Atopsyche schlnidi Denning 1965, here re- named: Atopsyche onorei Sykora, nomen no- vum. Family Hydrobiosidae Atopsyche schmidi Denning was synonymized with A. callosa (Navhs) by Flint in 1975. As a Australochorema Schmid 195513, synonym of Apa- consequence, the prior use of the name was tanodes Navhs 1934, new synonymy. overlooked by Sykora in 1991. The authorship of the Navhs' (1934) figures of Apatanodes sociata are replacement name is to be credited to Dr. Sykora surprisingly good; the wing venation agrees with who requested it be renamed Atopsyche onorei in Australochorema rectispinum Schmid, the type honor of the entomologist Dr. Giovanni Onore of the species of Australochorema (original designation), Universidad Catholica del Ecuador who participated in the forking of the veins and their relative lengths, in the expeditions of the Carnegie Museum of and the figures of the male genitalia are fully Natural History to Ecuador whereby the type compatible with species more recently described in material was collected. the genus. brachytergum,
Recommended publications
  • Examining Trichoptera Genitalia with Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy Christy Jo Geracy1 & Richard C

    Examining Trichoptera Genitalia with Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy Christy Jo Geracy1 & Richard C

    Nectopsyche Neotropical Trichoptera Newsletter ISSN 1550 - 7971 Issue Number 3 June 2006 Examining Trichoptera Genitalia with Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy Christy Jo Geracy1 & Richard C. Laughlin2 1Department of Entomology, Soils, and Plant Sciences, Clemson University, 2Department of Genetics and Biochemistry, Clemson University Corresponding Address: 114 Long Hall, Box 340315, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634 USA, [email protected] Introduction microscope and compiled into images by computer software. Table of Contents onfocal microscopy is a com- What makes confocal microscopy C Examining Trichoptera Genitalia mon tool that is based on the prin- potentially useful for taxonomy • with Confocal Scanning ciples of fluorescent microscopy. It and systematics is that it takes Microscopy.................................................1 has been around for decades, but image slices through the speci- • Editor’s Remarks..................................2 it has mainly been used by cellu- men at user-defined intervals • Colecta, cría y asociación en lar biologists to view intracellular and depths. This “digital dissec- Atopsyche (Collecting, rearing and structures labeled with fluorescent tion” process assures that only the associating Atopsyche, English and dyes. Recently, confocal imaging light that is in focus in any one Spanish)......................................................5 has been used for examining in- optical plane is captured. Out-of- • Featured photograph......................7 ternal morphology and the three- focus background noise, which • New Neotropical Trichoptera Lit- dimensional shape of the cuticle often obscures images taken with erature (2004-June 2006).....................8 in Blattodea (Periplaneta, Blaberus; conventional light microscopy, is • Being an Entomologist....................9 Larsen et al. 1997, Zill et al. 2000), eliminated. Each digital slice can • Featured illustration.......................10 and as well as muscle tissue and be examined individually, or the • E-mail List..................................
  • Research Report110

    Research Report110

    ~ ~ WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES A Survey of Rare and Endangered Mayflies of Selected RESEARCH Rivers of Wisconsin by Richard A. Lillie REPORT110 Bureau of Research, Monona December 1995 ~ Abstract The mayfly fauna of 25 rivers and streams in Wisconsin were surveyed during 1991-93 to document the temporal and spatial occurrence patterns of two state endangered mayflies, Acantha­ metropus pecatonica and Anepeorus simplex. Both species are candidates under review for addition to the federal List of Endang­ ered and Threatened Wildlife. Based on previous records of occur­ rence in Wisconsin, sampling was conducted during the period May-July using a combination of sampling methods, including dredges, air-lift pumps, kick-nets, and hand-picking of substrates. No specimens of Anepeorus simplex were collected. Three specimens (nymphs or larvae) of Acanthametropus pecatonica were found in the Black River, one nymph was collected from the lower Wisconsin River, and a partial exuviae was collected from the Chippewa River. Homoeoneuria ammophila was recorded from Wisconsin waters for the first time from the Black River and Sugar River. New site distribution records for the following Wiscon­ sin special concern species include: Macdunnoa persimplex, Metretopus borealis, Paracloeodes minutus, Parameletus chelifer, Pentagenia vittigera, Cercobrachys sp., and Pseudiron centra/is. Collection of many of the aforementioned species from large rivers appears to be dependent upon sampling sand-bottomed substrates at frequent intervals, as several species were relatively abundant during only very short time spans. Most species were associated with sand substrates in water < 2 m deep. Acantha­ metropus pecatonica and Anepeorus simplex should continue to be listed as endangered for state purposes and receive a biological rarity ranking of critically imperiled (S1 ranking), and both species should be considered as candidates proposed for listing as endangered or threatened as defined by the Endangered Species Act.
  • Invertebrate Prey Selectivity of Channel Catfish (Ictalurus Punctatus) in Western South Dakota Prairie Streams Erin D

    Invertebrate Prey Selectivity of Channel Catfish (Ictalurus Punctatus) in Western South Dakota Prairie Streams Erin D

    South Dakota State University Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange Electronic Theses and Dissertations 2017 Invertebrate Prey Selectivity of Channel Catfish (Ictalurus punctatus) in Western South Dakota Prairie Streams Erin D. Peterson South Dakota State University Follow this and additional works at: https://openprairie.sdstate.edu/etd Part of the Aquaculture and Fisheries Commons, and the Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons Recommended Citation Peterson, Erin D., "Invertebrate Prey Selectivity of Channel Catfish (Ictalurus punctatus) in Western South Dakota Prairie Streams" (2017). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 1677. https://openprairie.sdstate.edu/etd/1677 This Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INVERTEBRATE PREY SELECTIVITY OF CHANNEL CATFISH (ICTALURUS PUNCTATUS) IN WESTERN SOUTH DAKOTA PRAIRIE STREAMS BY ERIN D. PETERSON A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the degree for the Master of Science Major in Wildlife and Fisheries Sciences South Dakota State University 2017 iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS South Dakota Game, Fish & Parks provided funding for this project. Oak Lake Field Station and the Department of Natural Resource Management at South Dakota State University provided lab space. My sincerest thanks to my advisor, Dr. Nels H. Troelstrup, Jr., for all of the guidance and support he has provided over the past three years and for taking a chance on me.
  • Biological Diversity, Ecological Health and Condition of Aquatic Assemblages at National Wildlife Refuges in Southern Indiana, USA

    Biological Diversity, Ecological Health and Condition of Aquatic Assemblages at National Wildlife Refuges in Southern Indiana, USA

    Biodiversity Data Journal 3: e4300 doi: 10.3897/BDJ.3.e4300 Taxonomic Paper Biological Diversity, Ecological Health and Condition of Aquatic Assemblages at National Wildlife Refuges in Southern Indiana, USA Thomas P. Simon†, Charles C. Morris‡, Joseph R. Robb§, William McCoy | † Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 46403, United States of America ‡ US National Park Service, Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore, Porter, IN 47468, United States of America § US Fish and Wildlife Service, Big Oaks National Wildlife Refuge, Madison, IN 47250, United States of America | US Fish and Wildlife Service, Patoka River National Wildlife Refuge, Oakland City, IN 47660, United States of America Corresponding author: Thomas P. Simon ([email protected]) Academic editor: Benjamin Price Received: 08 Dec 2014 | Accepted: 09 Jan 2015 | Published: 12 Jan 2015 Citation: Simon T, Morris C, Robb J, McCoy W (2015) Biological Diversity, Ecological Health and Condition of Aquatic Assemblages at National Wildlife Refuges in Southern Indiana, USA. Biodiversity Data Journal 3: e4300. doi: 10.3897/BDJ.3.e4300 Abstract The National Wildlife Refuge system is a vital resource for the protection and conservation of biodiversity and biological integrity in the United States. Surveys were conducted to determine the spatial and temporal patterns of fish, macroinvertebrate, and crayfish populations in two watersheds that encompass three refuges in southern Indiana. The Patoka River National Wildlife Refuge had the highest number of aquatic species with 355 macroinvertebrate taxa, six crayfish species, and 82 fish species, while the Big Oaks National Wildlife Refuge had 163 macroinvertebrate taxa, seven crayfish species, and 37 fish species. The Muscatatuck National Wildlife Refuge had the lowest diversity of macroinvertebrates with 96 taxa and six crayfish species, while possessing the second highest fish species richness with 51 species.
  • Amphiesmeno- Ptera: the Caddisflies and Lepidoptera

    Amphiesmeno- Ptera: the Caddisflies and Lepidoptera

    CY501-C13[548-606].qxd 2/16/05 12:17 AM Page 548 quark11 27B:CY501:Chapters:Chapter-13: 13Amphiesmeno-Amphiesmenoptera: The ptera:Caddisflies The and Lepidoptera With very few exceptions the life histories of the orders Tri- from Old English traveling cadice men, who pinned bits of choptera (caddisflies)Caddisflies and Lepidoptera (moths and butter- cloth to their and coats to advertise their fabrics. A few species flies) are extremely different; the former have aquatic larvae, actually have terrestrial larvae, but even these are relegated to and the latter nearly always have terrestrial, plant-feeding wet leaf litter, so many defining features of the order concern caterpillars. Nonetheless, the close relationship of these two larval adaptations for an almost wholly aquatic lifestyle (Wig- orders hasLepidoptera essentially never been disputed and is supported gins, 1977, 1996). For example, larvae are apneustic (without by strong morphological (Kristensen, 1975, 1991), molecular spiracles) and respire through a thin, permeable cuticle, (Wheeler et al., 2001; Whiting, 2002), and paleontological evi- some of which have filamentous abdominal gills that are sim- dence. Synapomorphies linking these two orders include het- ple or intricately branched (Figure 13.3). Antennae and the erogametic females; a pair of glands on sternite V (found in tentorium of larvae are reduced, though functional signifi- Trichoptera and in basal moths); dense, long setae on the cance of these features is unknown. Larvae do not have pro- wing membrane (which are modified into scales in Lepi- legs on most abdominal segments, save for a pair of anal pro- doptera); forewing with the anal veins looping up to form a legs that have sclerotized hooks for anchoring the larva in its double “Y” configuration; larva with a fused hypopharynx case.
  • SOP #: MDNR-WQMS-209 EFFECTIVE DATE: May 31, 2005

    SOP #: MDNR-WQMS-209 EFFECTIVE DATE: May 31, 2005

    MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AIR AND LAND PROTECTION DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES PROGRAM Standard Operating Procedures SOP #: MDNR-WQMS-209 EFFECTIVE DATE: May 31, 2005 SOP TITLE: Taxonomic Levels for Macroinvertebrate Identifications WRITTEN BY: Randy Sarver, WQMS, ESP APPROVED BY: Earl Pabst, Director, ESP SUMMARY OF REVISIONS: Changes to reflect new taxa and current taxonomy APPLICABILITY: Applies to Water Quality Monitoring Section personnel who perform community level surveys of aquatic macroinvertebrates in wadeable streams of Missouri . DISTRIBUTION: MoDNR Intranet ESP SOP Coordinator RECERTIFICATION RECORD: Date Reviewed Initials Page 1 of 30 MDNR-WQMS-209 Effective Date: 05/31/05 Page 2 of 30 1.0 GENERAL OVERVIEW 1.1 This Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) is designed to be used as a reference by biologists who analyze aquatic macroinvertebrate samples from Missouri. Its purpose is to establish consistent levels of taxonomic resolution among agency, academic and other biologists. The information in this SOP has been established by researching current taxonomic literature. It should assist an experienced aquatic biologist to identify organisms from aquatic surveys to a consistent and reliable level. The criteria used to set the level of taxonomy beyond the genus level are the systematic treatment of the genus by a professional taxonomist and the availability of a published key. 1.2 The consistency in macroinvertebrate identification allowed by this document is important regardless of whether one person is conducting an aquatic survey over a period of time or multiple investigators wish to compare results. It is especially important to provide guidance on the level of taxonomic identification when calculating metrics that depend upon the number of taxa.
  • This Table Contains a Taxonomic List of Benthic Invertebrates Collected from Streams in the Upper Mississippi River Basin Study

    This Table Contains a Taxonomic List of Benthic Invertebrates Collected from Streams in the Upper Mississippi River Basin Study

    This table contains a taxonomic list of benthic invertebrates collected from streams in the Upper Mississippi River Basin study unit as part of the USGS National Water Quality Assessemnt (NAWQA) Program. Invertebrates were collected from woody snags in selected streams from 1996-2004. Data Retreival occurred 26-JAN-06 11.10.25 AM from the USGS data warehouse (Taxonomic List Invert http://water.usgs.gov/nawqa/data). The data warehouse currently contains invertebrate data through 09/30/2002. Invertebrate taxa can include provisional and conditional identifications. For more information about invertebrate sample processing and taxonomic standards see, "Methods of analysis by the U.S. Geological Survey National Water Quality Laboratory -- Processing, taxonomy, and quality control of benthic macroinvertebrate samples", at << http://nwql.usgs.gov/Public/pubs/OFR00-212.html >>. Data Retrieval Precaution: Extreme caution must be exercised when comparing taxonomic lists generated using different search criteria. This is because the number of samples represented by each taxa list will vary depending on the geographic criteria selected for the retrievals. In addition, species lists retrieved at different times using the same criteria may differ because: (1) the taxonomic nomenclature (names) were updated, and/or (2) new samples containing new taxa may Phylum Class Order Family Subfamily Tribe Genus Species Taxon Porifera Porifera Cnidaria Hydrozoa Hydroida Hydridae Hydridae Cnidaria Hydrozoa Hydroida Hydridae Hydra Hydra sp. Platyhelminthes Turbellaria Turbellaria Nematoda Nematoda Bryozoa Bryozoa Mollusca Gastropoda Gastropoda Mollusca Gastropoda Mesogastropoda Mesogastropoda Mollusca Gastropoda Mesogastropoda Viviparidae Campeloma Campeloma sp. Mollusca Gastropoda Mesogastropoda Viviparidae Viviparus Viviparus sp. Mollusca Gastropoda Mesogastropoda Hydrobiidae Hydrobiidae Mollusca Gastropoda Basommatophora Ancylidae Ancylidae Mollusca Gastropoda Basommatophora Ancylidae Ferrissia Ferrissia sp.
  • Diversity and Ecosystem Services of Trichoptera

    Diversity and Ecosystem Services of Trichoptera

    Review Diversity and Ecosystem Services of Trichoptera John C. Morse 1,*, Paul B. Frandsen 2,3, Wolfram Graf 4 and Jessica A. Thomas 5 1 Department of Plant & Environmental Sciences, Clemson University, E-143 Poole Agricultural Center, Clemson, SC 29634-0310, USA; [email protected] 2 Department of Plant & Wildlife Sciences, Brigham Young University, 701 E University Parkway Drive, Provo, UT 84602, USA; [email protected] 3 Data Science Lab, Smithsonian Institution, 600 Maryland Ave SW, Washington, D.C. 20024, USA 4 BOKU, Institute of Hydrobiology and Aquatic Ecology Management, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Gregor Mendelstr. 33, A-1180 Vienna, Austria; [email protected] 5 Department of Biology, University of York, Wentworth Way, York Y010 5DD, UK; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-864-656-5049 Received: 2 February 2019; Accepted: 12 April 2019; Published: 1 May 2019 Abstract: The holometabolous insect order Trichoptera (caddisflies) includes more known species than all of the other primarily aquatic orders of insects combined. They are distributed unevenly; with the greatest number and density occurring in the Oriental Biogeographic Region and the smallest in the East Palearctic. Ecosystem services provided by Trichoptera are also very diverse and include their essential roles in food webs, in biological monitoring of water quality, as food for fish and other predators (many of which are of human concern), and as engineers that stabilize gravel bed sediment. They are especially important in capturing and using a wide variety of nutrients in many forms, transforming them for use by other organisms in freshwaters and surrounding riparian areas.
  • Functional Feeding Groups of Aquatic Insect Families in Latin America: a Critical Analysis and Review of Existing Literature

    Functional Feeding Groups of Aquatic Insect Families in Latin America: a Critical Analysis and Review of Existing Literature

    Functional feeding groups of aquatic insect families in Latin America: a critical analysis and review of existing literature Alonso Ramírez1 & Pablo E. Gutiérrez-Fonseca2 1. Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Puerto Rico, P.O. Box 190341, San Juan, Puerto Rico 00919; [email protected] 2. Department of Biology, University of Puerto Rico Rio Piedras, San Juan, Puerto Rico 00919; [email protected] Received 12-XII-2013. Corrected 20-I-2014. Accepted 13-II-2014. Abstract: Aquatic macroinvertebrates are involved in numerous processes within aquatic ecosystems. They often have important effects on ecosystem processes such as primary production (via grazing), detritus break- down, and nutrient mineralization and downstream spiraling. The functional feeding groups (FFG) classification was developed as a tool to facilitate the incorporation of macroinvertebrates in studies of aquatic ecosystems. This classification has the advantage of combining morphological characteristics (e.g., mouth part specializa- tion) and behavioral mechanisms (e.g., way of feeding) used by macroinvertebrates when consuming resources. Although recent efforts have greatly advanced our ability to identify aquatic macroinvertebrates, there is limited information on FFG assignment. Furthermore, there has been some variation in the use of the FFG classification, in part due to an emphasis on using gut content analysis to assign FFG, which is more appropriate for assigning trophic guilds. Thus, the main goals of this study are to (1) provide an overview of the value of using the FFG classification, (2) make an initial attempt to summarize available information on FFG for aquatic insects in Latin America, and (3) provide general guidelines on how to assign organisms to their FFGs.
  • Protocol for Monitoring Aquatic Invertebrates at Ozark National Scenic Riverways, Missouri, and Buffalo National River, Arkansas

    Protocol for Monitoring Aquatic Invertebrates at Ozark National Scenic Riverways, Missouri, and Buffalo National River, Arkansas

    Protocol for Monitoring Aquatic Invertebrates at Ozark National Scenic Riverways, Missouri, and Buffalo National River, Arkansas. Heartland I&M Network SOP 4: Laboratory Processing and Identification of Invertebrates Version 1.2 (03/11/2021) Revision History Log: Previous Revision Author Changes Made Reason for Change New Version # Date Version # Dec 2, 2016 Bowles References updates References were 1.0 1.1 insufficient 1.1 3/11/2021 HR Dodd QA/QC procedures and Clarify QA procedures and 1.2 certification process increase data integrity of clarified; sample sample processing and processing and identification identification methods clarified This SOP explains procedures for processing and storing samples after field collection as well as identification of specimens. Procedures for storing reference specimens are also described. I. Preparing the Sample for Processing Processing procedures apply to all benthic samples. This is an important and time-consuming step. Particular care should be taken to ensure that samples are being processed thoroughly and efficiently. The purpose of sorting is to remove invertebrates from other material in the sample. Procedure: A. Sample processing begins by pouring the original field sample into a USGS standard sieve (500-µm) placed in a catch pan. The preservative that is drained from the sample should be placed back in the original sample container for eventual rehydration of remaining sample debris that is not sorted during the subsample procedure described below. B. Rinse the sample contents in the sieve with tap water to flush the residual preservative. Large debris material (>2 cm; i.e. leaves, sticks, rocks) should be removed by hand and rinsed into the sieve.
  • Butterflies of North America

    Butterflies of North America

    Insects of Western North America 7. Survey of Selected Arthropod Taxa of Fort Sill, Comanche County, Oklahoma. 4. Hexapoda: Selected Coleoptera and Diptera with cumulative list of Arthropoda and additional taxa Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1177 2 Insects of Western North America. 7. Survey of Selected Arthropod Taxa of Fort Sill, Comanche County, Oklahoma. 4. Hexapoda: Selected Coleoptera and Diptera with cumulative list of Arthropoda and additional taxa by Boris C. Kondratieff, Luke Myers, and Whitney S. Cranshaw C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523 August 22, 2011 Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity. Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1177 3 Cover Photo Credits: Whitney S. Cranshaw. Females of the blow fly Cochliomyia macellaria (Fab.) laying eggs on an animal carcass on Fort Sill, Oklahoma. ISBN 1084-8819 This publication and others in the series may be ordered from the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity, Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, 80523-1177. Copyrighted 2011 4 Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................................7 SUMMARY AND MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS
  • Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, Megaloptera, and Trichoptera of Great Smoky Mountains National Park

    Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, Megaloptera, and Trichoptera of Great Smoky Mountains National Park

    The Great Smoky Mountains National Park All Taxa Biodiversity Inventory: A Search for Species in Our Own Backyard 2007 Southeastern Naturalist Special Issue 1:159–174 Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, Megaloptera, and Trichoptera of Great Smoky Mountains National Park Charles R. Parker1,*, Oliver S. Flint, Jr.2, Luke M. Jacobus3, Boris C. Kondratieff 4, W. Patrick McCafferty3, and John C. Morse5 Abstract - Great Smoky Mountains National Park (GSMNP), situated on the moun- tainous border of North Carolina and Tennessee, is recognized as one of the most highly diverse protected areas in the temperate region. In order to provide baseline data for the scientifi c management of GSMNP, an All Taxa Biodiversity Inventory (ATBI) was initiated in 1998. Among the goals of the ATBI are to discover the identity and distribution of as many as possible of the species of life that occur in GSMNP. The authors have concentrated on the orders of completely aquatic insects other than odonates. We examined or utilized others’ records of more than 53,600 adult and 78,000 immature insects from 545 locations. At present, 469 species are known from GSMNP, including 120 species of Ephemeroptera (mayfl ies), 111 spe- cies of Plecoptera (stonefl ies), 7 species of Megaloptera (dobsonfl ies, fi shfl ies, and alderfl ies), and 231 species of Trichoptera (caddisfl ies). Included in this total are 10 species new to science discovered since the ATBI began. Introduction Great Smoky Mountains National Park (GSMNP) is situated on the border of North Carolina and Tennessee and is comprised of 221,000 ha. GSMNP is recognized as one of the most diverse protected areas in the temperate region (Nichols and Langdon 2007).