DOCSLIB.ORG

Proposed Kuruman Wind Energy Facility (Phase 1 and 2) Including Grid Connection Infrastructure, Kuruman, Northern Cape

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Proposed Kuruman Wind Energy Facility (Phase 1 and 2) Including Grid Connection Infrastructure, Kuruman, Northern Cape HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENT In terms of Section 38(8) of the NHRA for the Proposed Kuruman Wind Energy Facility (Phase 1 and 2) including grid connection infrastructure, Kuruman, Northern Cape Prepared by Jenna Lavin and Nic Wiltshire With Jonathan Kaplan (ACRM) and Dr John Almond (Natura Viva cc) In Association with the CSIR July 2018 THE INDEPENDENT PERSON WHO COMPILED A SPECIALIST REPORT OR UNDERTOOK A SPECIALIST PROCESS I Jenna Lavin, as the appointed independent specialist hereby declare that I: • act/ed as the independent specialist in this application; • regard the information contained in this report as it relates to my specialist input/study to be true and correct, and • do not have and will not have any financial interest in the undertaking of the activity, other than remuneration for work performed in terms of the NEMA, the Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations, 2010 and any specific environmental management Act; • have and will not have no vested interest in the proposed activity proceeding; • have disclosed, to the applicant, EAP and competent authority, any material information that have or may have the potential to influence the decision of the competent authority or the objectivity of any report, plan or document required in terms of the NEMA, the Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations, 2010 and any specific environmental management Act; • am fully aware of and meet the responsibilities in terms of NEMA, the Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations, 2010 (specifically in terms of regulation 17 of GN No. R. 543) and any specific environmental management Act, and that failure to comply with these requirements may constitute and result in disqualification; • have ensured that information containing all relevant facts in respect of the specialist input/study was distributed or made available to interested and affected parties and the public and that participation by interested and affected parties was facilitated in such a manner that all interested and affected parties were provided with a reasonable opportunity to participate and to provide comments on the specialist input/study; • have ensured that the comments of all interested and affected parties on the specialist input/study were considered, recorded and submitted to the competent authority in respect of the application; • have ensured that the names of all interested and affected parties that participated in terms of the specialist input/study were recorded in the register of interested and affected parties who participated in the public participation process; • have provided the competent authority with access to all information at my disposal regarding the application, whether such information is favourable to the applicant or not; and • am aware that a false declaration is an offence in terms of regulation 71 of GN No. R. 543. Signature of the specialist CTS Heritage Name of company 20 July 2018 Date 1 CTS Heritage 34 Harries Street, Plumstead, Cape Town, 7800 Tel:​ (087) 073 5739 ​Email:​ [email protected] ​Web:​ www.ctsheritage.com EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Mulilo Renewable Project Developments (Pty) Ltd (hereafter, “Mulilo”) appointed the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (hereafter, “CSIR”). Mulilo has proposed to build the Kuruman Wind Energy Facility (WEF) in two phases (1&2). This assessment is for Phases 1 and 2 of this project, as well as the proposed 132kV powerline. The number of turbines to be completed in Phase 1 is 47 and Phase 2 is 52. Each turbine has a maximum output of 4.5MW, blade height of 140m and blade length of 80m. Foundations will be excavated to a depth of 3m. Additional infrastructure assessed for the EIA will include 5m wide connecting roads and widening of existing roads to 8m. New roads constructed will connect all turbines. The WEF will also be connected to the grid via two 132kV overhead powerlines to Kuruman (Segame Substation, 10km in length) and Kathu (Ferrum Substation, 50km in length). Proposed WEF The study site for the proposed Phase 1 and 2 Kuruman WEF (i.e. turbine location sites, access roads, substations, laydown areas) is not a sensitive archaeological landscape. A limited number of stone implements (isolated and dispersed scatters of Later Stone Age tools including retouched and utilized flakes, chunks, and a few cores in locally available banded ironstone), occur on some of the high hill top sites and access roads. Archaeological artefacts are located among extensive scatters of ironstone gravels which are ubiquitous in the surrounding area. No settlement sites, quarry sites, or evidence of human occupation were identified. Banded ironstone is a ready source of raw material across the entire study area. The hilltop sites are not conducive to pre-colonial settlement due to their high elevation, lack of caves as well as their isolated, exposed, cold and windy nature. The proposed WEF substations and laydown areas do not constitute a sensitive archaeological landscape. All comprise level sites covered in knee high dry grass on red sands. Given the low overall low palaeosensitivity of the proposed footprint, it is concluded that in terms of palaeontological heritage resources the impact significance of the Kuruman WEF Phase 1 an 2 is ​low (​negative​), both before and after mitigation. This assessment applies to the construction phase and to all relevant components of the WEF infrastructure (​e.g. wind turbines, internal and external access roads, underground cabling, on-site substation and construction yards). Significant impacts during the operational and de-commissioning phases are not anticipated. None of the fossil sites identified fall inside the WEF development footprint and no specialist palaeontological mitigation is therefore proposed here. Small stromatolite-rich outcrop areas of Campbell Rand carbonates to the east of the WEF footprint (areas outlined in red in Figures 8a, b and c) should be designated as No-Go Areas and protected from any disturbance or development. Proposed Powerline Route The proposed powerline route is not a sensitive archaeological landscape, despite it crossing several eco-zones. Long stretches of the route, for example, from Bothaskop till the district gravel road, cross mostly flat lands covered in knee high dry grasses and dense Acacia thicket vegetation on a substrate of loose, red sands. Extensive scatters and patches of ironstone gravels occur in places, where only a few isolated tools were noted, but no settlement or occupation sites were located. Indications are that these tools represent mostly discarded flakes and/or flake debris. The route, from the district gravel road, over the hilltops to Bramcote Farm is also not a sensitive archaeological landscape. Most of the route passes through Woodstock Farm towards the Eskom substation at Kuruman. It crosses flat lands covered in tall dry grasses, with small pockets of dense thicket (Acacia) vegetation (closer to Kuruman), on a substrate of red sands with virtually no surface stone occurring. However, patches and scatters of banded ironstone do occur in places, where a few isolated tools in banded iron stone were identified, however these are mostly discarded flakes and flake debris. Some of these occurrences are located outside of the study area, and were not given GPS locations. 2 CTS Heritage 34 Harries Street, Plumstead, Cape Town, 7800 Tel:​ (087) 073 5739 ​Email:​ [email protected] ​Web:​ www.ctsheritage.com It is interesting to note that fine grained CCS / translucent chert flakes were also noted in the powerline route between Hartlands Farm and the Kuruman Eskom substation, and on Bothaskop (located outside of the study area). In terms of palaeontological heritage resources, the impact significance of the Kuruman WEF 132 kV grid connection is low (negative), both before and after mitigation. This assessment applies to both 132 kV grid connection options under consideration and is based on (1) the low overall low palaeosensitivity of the 132 kV grid connection study region (including both corridor alternatives) as well as (2) the small footprint of the individual electrical pylon footings and associated service roads (i.e. small volume of bedrock excavations or surface clearance entailed). There is no preference on palaeontological heritage grounds for either one of the grid connection route options. Significant impacts during the operational and de-commissioning phases of the 132 kV grid connection are not anticipated. Confidence levels for this assessment are medium, given the low levels of bedrock exposure. In the context of other alternative energy and associated powerline developments in the broader Kathu – Kuruman region, cumulative impacts posed by the Kuruman WEF 132 kV grid connection project are of low significance. Recommendations No mitigation is required prior to construction activities occurring. However, it is recommended that a Heritage Conservation Management Plan be developed for the WEF to ensure that heritage resources are continuously managed throughout the operational phase of the development. This CMP must be required as a condition of Environmental Authorisation. Rock Art - All rock art sites (Sites KUR28, KUR36, KUR37, KUR44, KUR45, KUR46 and TK1, TK3, TK4 and TK5), must be avoided and should not be visited. Location of rock art sites should not be made public. - A no-go buffer zone of 20m must be kept around each rock art site Burial Grounds and Graves - These sites must not be impacted by the proposed development (TK2A, TK7, TK8 and BR2 and BR6) - a 50m buffer
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Final Minutes
    Zitholele Consulting Reg. No. 2000/000392/07 PO Box 6002 Halfway House 1685, South Africa Building 1, Maxwell Office Park, Magwa Crescent West c/o Allandale Road & Maxwell Drive, Waterfall City, Midrand Tel + (27) 11 207 2060 Fax + (27) 86 674 6121 Basic Assessment (BA) and Water Use Licence Application (IWULA) for the proposed upgrading of the 66kV network to 132kV network in the Kuruman area, Northern Cape Province (DEA Ref.: 14/12/16/3/3/1/1376) BAGA JANTJIE TRADITIONAL COUNCIL CONSULTATION Wednesday, 11 February 2015, 11h00 Baga Jantjie Traditional Council Offices, Manyeding Village Final Minutes Note: These minutes are a summary of the presentation made to the Tribal Council Members and the comments / questions / concerns raised by the Tribal Council Members and are not verbatim. List of abbreviations: BA Basic Assessment BJTC Baga Jantjie Tribal Council CoGHSTA Cooperative Governance, Human Settlements and Traditional Affairs 1. WELCOME, INTRODUCTIONS AND APOLOGIES Zitholele Consulting was introduced by Mr Mmusinyane (Manager -Traditional Affairs) to the Baga Jantjie Traditional Council (BJTC) as the independent Environmental Consultants conducting the Basic Assessment and Public Participation processes for the project that will be presented. Thereafter a warm welcome was extended by Mr MD Ilanka (BJTC) as well as the Honourable Kgosi Jantjie (Chief – BJTC). Tricia Njapha (Public Participation Practitioner, Zitholele Consulting, briefly introduced herself and Dr Mathys Vosloo, Project Manager, and gave a brief summary of their role in the proposed project and then continued to brief the BJTC of the purpose of the Consultation. It was agreed by all present that the information provided by Zitholele Consulting will be presented in English and will be translated during the meeting into Tswana by Mr Boitshoko Moacwi.
    [Show full text]
  • North West Northern Cape Proposed Main Seat / Sub District Within The
    # # !C # # ### !C^# !.!C# # # !C # # # # # # # # # # # ^!C # # # # # # # ^ # # ^ # # !C # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # !C# # # !C # # # # # # # ## # # !C# # # # #!C# # # # # # !C ^ # # # # # # # ^ # # #!C # # # # # # # !C # #^ # # # # # # ## # #!C # # # # # # ## !C # # # # # # # !C# ## # # #!C # !C # # # # # # # # # ^ # # # # # # # # # # # !C# # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #!C ## # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # # !C # # ## # # # # # # # # # !C # #!C # ## ## # # # # # # # # # # !C# # #^ # # # # # # # # !C# # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # # #!C ## # ##^ # !C #!C# # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # # ## # # # # #!C ^ # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # ## # # !C # !C # # # # !C# # # # # # #!C # # !C## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # ## ## ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #!C # ## # # # # # # # ## # # ^!C # # # # # ^ # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # ## # # # # #!C # !C # # !C # # # # #!C # # # # # !C# # # # # # # # # ## # !C # ## # # # # # ## # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # !C # # # # # #### # # # # # # !C# # ## !C# # # !C # ## !C !C #!. # # # # # # # # # # ## ## # #!C# # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # ### # #^ # # # # # # # # # ^ # !C ## # # # # # # # # # # # !C## # # # # # # # # ## # ## # ## ## # !C## !C## # # # !C # # # # ## # !C # # # ^ # # !C ## # # # !C# ^# #!C # !C # # # !C ## # # #!C ## # # # # # # # # # ## # !C## ## # # # # # # # # #!C # # # # # # # ## ## # # # # !C # # # # # !C ^ # ## # ## # # # # # !. # # # # # !C # !C# # ### # # # # # # #
    [Show full text]
  • Briefing to the Select Committee on Security and Justice
    Briefing to the Select Committee on Security and Justice 03 June 2020 Presentation: Notice of submission for approval of another Declaration of Amnesty Presentation Overview 1. Purpose 2. Background 3. Monthly comparisons 4. Status of Firearms and Ammunitions per province 5. Integrated Ballistic Information System (IBIS) Testing of Firearms 6. Status of Firearm Licence Applications 7. Comparison of Amnesties 8. Contact crimes committed with firearms in 2010 Amnesty period 9. Contact crimes committed with firearms in 2019/2020 Amnesty period 10. Achievement of objectives 11. Motivation for another Amnesty 12. Proposed Firearm 2020 Amnesty 13. Conclusion 2 Purpose To brief the Select Committee on Security and Justice, on the progress of Amnesty 2019/20 and to seek support for another amnesty for a period of six (6) months. 3 Background Firearm Amnesty was approved by Parliament on 21 November 2019 for the period of six (6) from 1 December 2019 to 31 May 2020. The amnesty was premised on the following Five (5) objectives: . To reduce the number of illegally possessed firearms in circulation in South Africa. To provide firearm owners with the opportunity to hand in unwanted firearms. To prevent crime and violence and to promote safety. To address the fundamental causes of crime in order to effectively protect our communities. To ensure people living in South Africa feel and have no fear of crime. The partial achievement of the set objectives and numerous requests from members of the public prompted a submission for another amnesty. The presentation will include the comparison of amnesty 2019/2020 with the previous amnesties.
    [Show full text]
  • 14 Northern Cape Province
    Section B:Section Profile B:Northern District HealthCape Province Profiles 14 Northern Cape Province John Taolo Gaetsewe District Municipality (DC45) Overview of the district The John Taolo Gaetsewe District Municipalitya (previously Kgalagadi) is a Category C municipality located in the north of the Northern Cape Province, bordering Botswana in the west. It comprises the three local municipalities of Gamagara, Ga- Segonyana and Joe Morolong, and 186 towns and settlements, of which the majority (80%) are villages. The boundaries of this district were demarcated in 2006 to include the once north-western part of Joe Morolong and Olifantshoek, along with its surrounds, into the Gamagara Local Municipality. It has an established rail network from Sishen South and between Black Rock and Dibeng. It is characterised by a mixture of land uses, of which agriculture and mining are dominant. The district holds potential as a viable tourist destination and has numerous growth opportunities in the industrial sector. Area: 27 322km² Population (2016)b: 238 306 Population density (2016): 8.7 persons per km2 Estimated medical scheme coverage: 14.5% Cities/Towns: Bankhara-Bodulong, Deben, Hotazel, Kathu, Kuruman, Mothibistad, Olifantshoek, Santoy, Van Zylsrus. Main Economic Sectors: Agriculture, mining, retail. Population distribution, local municipality boundaries and health facility locations Source: Mid-Year Population Estimates 2016, Stats SA. a The Local Government Handbook South Africa 2017. A complete guide to municipalities in South Africa. Seventh
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Impact Assessment Process and Public Participation Process
    SITE NOTICES HYPERION SOLAR DEVELOPMENT 2, NORTHERN CAPE PROVINCE Final Environmental Impact Assessment Report May 2019 PROOF OF SITE NOTICES (Date placed: 03 October 2018) Figure 1: Site notice placed on a boundary fence at the start point of Access Road Alternative 2 along the existing T25 gravel road (27°37'02.59"S; 23°04'07.79"E). Appendix C2: Proof of Site Notices Page 1 HYPERION SOLAR DEVELOPMENT 2, NORTHERN CAPE PROVINCE Final Environmental Impact Assessment Report May 2019 Figure 2: Site notice placed at the T-junction between the existing T26 gravel road and the N14 national route (25°37'02.59"S; 23°04'07.79"E). Appendix C2: Proof of Site Notices Page 2 HYPERION SOLAR DEVELOPMENT 2, NORTHERN CAPE PROVINCE Final Environmental Impact Assessment Report May 2019 Figure 3: Site notice placed on the boundary fence of the Remaining Extent of the Farm Lyndoch 423 (i.e. the project site) (27°34'12.09"S; 23°05'58.56"E). Appendix C2: Proof of Site Notices Page 3 ADVERTISEMENTS ANNOUNCEMENT OF EIARs AND INVITATION TO PUBLIC MEETING NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT AND INVITATION TO PUBLIC MEETING ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PROCESS FOR THE PROPOSED HYPERION SOLAR DEVELOPMENT 1 AND 2, NORTHERN CAPE PROVINCE Project Name: Applicant: DEA Reference Number Hyperion Solar Development 1 Hyperion Solar Development 1 (Pty) Ltd 14/12/16/3/3/2/1109 Hyperion Solar Development 2 Cyraguard (Pty) Ltd 14/12/16/3/3/2/1110 Proposed Activity: The construction of two (2) separate photovoltaic (PV) solar energy facilities (SEFs) each with a contracted capacity of up to 75MW.
    [Show full text]
  • Ga-Segonyana – Northern Cape
    Working for integration Kagisano/Molopo Joe Morolong Naledi Northern Cape Dr Ruth Segomotsi John Taolo Mompati District Gaetsewe District Municipality Municipality N14 Greater Taung Gamagara Ga-Segonyana Frances Baard District Municipality Phokwane Siyanda District Municipality Magareng Kgatelopele Dikgatlong Tsantsabane Sources: Esri, USGS, NOAA Ga-Segonyana – Northern Cape Housing Market Overview Human Settlements Mining Town Intervention 2008 – 2013 The Housing Development Agency (HDA) Block A, Riviera Office Park, 6 – 10 Riviera Road, Killarney, Johannesburg PO Box 3209, Houghton, South Africa 2041 Tel: +27 11 544 1000 Fax: +27 11 544 1006/7 Acknowledgements The Centre for Affordable Housing Finance (CAHF) in Africa, www.housingfinanceafrica.org Coordinated by Karishma Busgeeth & Johan Minnie for the HDA Disclaimer Reasonable care has been taken in the preparation of this report. The information contained herein has been derived from sources believed to be accurate and reliable. The Housing Development Agency does not assume responsibility for any error, omission or opinion contained herein, including but not limited to any decisions made based on the content of this report. © The Housing Development Agency 2015 Contents 1. Frequently Used Acronyms 1 2. Introduction 2 3. Context 5 4. Context: Mining Sector Overview 6 5. Context: Housing 7 6. Context: Market Reports 8 7. Key Findings: Housing Market Overview 9 8. Housing Performance Profile 10 9. Market Size 15 10. Market Activity 20 11. Lending Activity 27 12. Leverage 31 13. Affordability
    [Show full text]
  • NC Sub Oct2016 ZFM-Postmasburg.Pdf
    # # !C # ### # ^ #!.C# # !C # # # # # # # # # # # ^!C # # # # # # ^ # # ^ # ## # !C ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # !C# # # !C # # # # # ## # #!C# # # # # # #!C # # ^ ## # !C# # # # # # ## # # # # #!C # # ^ !C # # # ^# # # # # # # ## ## # ## # # !C # # # !C# ## # !C# # ## # # # # #!C # # # #!C##^ # # # # # # # # # # # #!C# ## ## # ## # # # # # # ## # ## # # # ## #!C ## # ## # # !C### # # # # # # # # # # # # !C## # # ## #!C # # # ##!C# # # # ##^# # # # # ## ###!C# # ## # # # ## # # # # # # # # ## ## # # # ## # # ## !C# #^ # #!C # # !C# # # # # # # ## # # # # # ## ## # # # # # !C # # ^ # # # ### # # ## ## # # # # ### ## ## # # # # !C# # !C # # # #!C # # # #!C# ### # #!C## # # # # # ## # # # # # # ## # ## ## # # ## # # ## # # # # # # ## ### ## # ##!C # ## # # # # # # # # ^ # # ^ ## # #### ## # # # # # # #!C# # ## # ## #!C## # #!C# ## # # !C# # # ##!C#### # # ## # # # # # !C# # # # ## ## # # # # # ## # ## # # # ## ## ##!C### # # # # # !C # !C## #!C # !C # #!.##!C# # # # ## # ## ## # # ### #!C# # # # # # # ## ###### # # ## # # # # # # ## ## #^# ## # # # ^ !C## # # !C# ## # # ### # # ## # ## # # ##!C### ##!C# # !C# ## # ^ # # # !C #### # # !C## ^!C#!C## # # # !C # #!C## #### ## ## #!C # ## # # ## # # # ## ## ## !C# # # # ## ## #!C # # # # !C # #!C^# ### ## ### ## # # # # # !C# !.### # #!C# #### ## # # # # ## # ## #!C# # # #### # #!C### # # # # ## # # ### # # # # # ## # # ^ # # !C ## # # # # !C# # # ## #^ # # ^ # ## #!C# # # ^ # !C# # #!C ## # ## # # # # # # # ### #!C# # #!C # # # #!C # # # # #!C #!C### # # # # !C# # # # ## # # # # # # # #
    [Show full text]
  • Insert Proposal Title
    Bid No. DEN 09/10/ENV Environmental Management Framework for John Taolo Gaetsewe District Municipality 28 February, 2011 Literature Review Gerard van Weele Tel: +27 (0) 21 950 8517 Email: [email protected] Building No. 1, Tygerberg Office Park, 163 Hendrik Verwoerd Drive, Plattekloof, 7500, CAPE TOWN Literature Review: Environmental Management Framework for John Taolo Gaetsewe District Municipality E02.PTA.000323 Page i SSI Environmental Literature Review: Environmental Management Framework for John Taolo Gaetsewe District Municipality DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION Client: Northern Cape Department of Environment and Nature Conservation Project Name: Environmental Management Framework for John Taolo Gaetsewe District Municipality SSI Environmental Reference Number: E02.PTA.000323 Client Reference: DEN 09/10/ENV Compiled by: Tasneem Collins Date: 28 February, 2011 Reviewer: Gerard van Weele © SSI Environmental All rights reserved No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, without the written permission from SSI Environmental. E02.PTA.000323 Page ii SSI Environmental Literature Review: Environmental Management Framework for John Taolo Gaetsewe District Municipality TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 REPORT OVERVIEW 1 1.1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.2 PROJECT AREA 1 2 SUMMARY TABLE 2 3 LOCAL DOCUMENTATION / STUDIES 3 3.1 KGALAGADI DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK (2006/2007) 3 3.2 MOSHAWENG LOCAL MUNICIPALITY SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK (2005) 10 3.3 GA-SEGONYANA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY
    [Show full text]
  • Building Statistics, 2013
    Building statistics, 2013 Statistics South Africa Pali Lehohla Report No. 50-11-01 (2013) Statistician-General Statistics South Africa i Building statistics, 2013 / Statistics South Africa Published by Statistics South Africa, Private Bag X44, Pretoria 0001 © Statistics South Africa, 2015 Users may apply or process this data, provided Statistics South Africa (Stats SA) is acknowledged as the original source of the data; that it is specified that the application and/or analysis is the result of the user's independent processing of the data; and that neither the basic data nor any reprocessed version or application thereof may be sold or offered for sale in any form whatsoever without prior permission from Stats SA. Stats SA Library Cataloguing-in-Publication (CIP) Data Building statistics, 2013 / Statistics South Africa. Pretoria: Statistics South Africa, 2015 Report No. 50-11-01 (2013) xii. 150 pp ISBN 978-0-621-43954-0 A complete set of Stats SA publications is available at Stats SA Library and the following libraries: National Library of South Africa, Pretoria Division Eastern Cape Library Services, King William's Town National Library of South Africa, Cape Town Division Central Regional Library, Polokwane Library of Parliament, Cape Town Central Reference Library, Mbombela Bloemfontein Public Library Central Reference Collection, Kimberley Natal Society Library, Pietermaritzburg Central Reference Library, Mmabatho Johannesburg Public Library This report is available on the Stats SA website: www.statssa.gov.za Copies are obtainable from: Printing and Distribution, Statistics South Africa Tel: (012) 310 8251 (012) 310 8093 (012) 310 8358 (012) 310 8161 Email: [email protected] [email protected] Building statistics, Report No.
    [Show full text]
  • RHODES 2 SOLAR PARK Property Description/ Amended DEIAR Ptn Owner/Contact Person Postal Address Physical Adrress Tel No
    RHODES 2 SOLAR PARK Property Description/ Amended DEIAR Ptn Owner/Contact Person Postal Address Physical Adrress Tel No. Fax Cell No. E-mail Method of Notice (BID) Comments DSR notification Comments CEIAR Notification Comments Comments Other Registered I&AP notification Adjacent landowners Tsineng Communal Property Association: Mr. 6/10/2015 registered Gasesa 272 1 PO Box 1196, KATHU, 8446 23/7/2015 registered post Did not register Augustine Bannane post 11 Hobson street Industrial 6/10/2015 email 22/2/2016 email 26/4/2016 email Rhodes 269 0 Mr. Pierre Hauman P.O. Box 714, KURUMAN, 8640 083 444 7988 [email protected] 23/7/2015 email sent & read Area KURUMAN notification & read notification & read notification & read P.O. Box 1443 KURUMAN 8460 PO Box 21 Manganiet Lane, Hotazel, 053 741 1287 0829050744 6/10/2015 email 22/2/2016 email 26/4/2016 email East 270 0 & 2 Jacobus Nicolaas & Heletta Rosia Pretorius [email protected] 23/7/2015 email sent & read 154 HOTAZEL 8490 8490 053 741 1664 0829050844 notification & read notification & read notification & read Sishen Iron Ore Company (Pty) Ltd 1204 Ruimsig, Crescent, 19/2/2016 cd sent PO Box 9679 CENTURION 0001 23/7/2015 registered post WA de Klerk Woodhill Estate, 0076, 6/10/2015 email registered post East 270 1 26/4/2016 email Mine Manager: Johan van Schalkwyk 053 739 2911 [email protected] notification & read 19/2/2016 cd sent Private Bag X506 KATHU 8446 Hendrik van Eck Road Kathu 23/7/2015 email sent notification Mr Jimmy Walker [email protected] registered post 19/2/2016 notification MIMECAST Dikgathlong 268 re 18 Jasmyn Street,Kuruman, 6/10/2015 registered H.M.G Stols P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • John Taolo Gaetsewe Disrict Integrated Human Settlement Sector Plan
    Choose a building block. || JOHN TAOLO GAETSEWE DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY INTEGRATED HUMAN SETTLEMENTS SECTOR PLAN FINAL REPORT 2019/20 JOHN TAOLO GAETSEWE INTEGRATED HUMAN SETTLEMENTS SECTOR PLAN 2019-2024 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Over the past decades South Africa has embarked on building a better life for all by providing and basic services as constitutional requirements. In terms of Section 9 (1)(f) of the Housing Act, 1997 (Act No. 107 of 1997) “Every municipality must, as part of the municipality’s process of integrated development planning, take all reasonable and necessary steps within the framework of national and provincial housing legislation and policy to initiate, plan, co-ordinate, facilitate, promote and enable appropriate housing development in its area of jurisdiction”. Municipalities are expected to prepare and adopt Integrated Development Plans (IDPs) as the basis for planning and coordinating service delivery. Within the IDP certain sector plans also need to be prepared, and the Integrated Human Settlements Sector Plan, is one of these. The Integrated Human Settlements Sector Plan is part of the IDP process and stands as a chapter within a municipality’s IDP; it is not a stand-alone plan resulting from a separate planning process. The Integrated Human Settlements Sector Plan aims to provide the strategic direction for transforming human settlements in the John Taolo Gaetsewe District aligned to the Provincial Department. This transformation relate to accelerating human settlement delivery on well-located land, that provide opportunities to beneficiaries to access the property market and have sufficient access to social amenities and economic opportunities. This transformation will further support the integration of communities and the spatial restructuring of the towns and villages in the Municipal area.
    [Show full text]
  • Joahn Taolo Gaetsewe District Profile
    2 PROFILE: CITY OF JOHANNESBURG METRO PROFILE: CITY OF JOHANNESBURG METRO 3 CONTENT 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................. 6 2. BRIEF OVERVIEW ......................................................................................................... 7 Historical Perspective ...................................................................................................................... 7 Location ........................................................................................................................................... 8 Spatial Status ................................................................................................................................... 9 Land Ownership ............................................................................................................................. 11 3. SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT PROFILE ............................................................................. 14 3.1 Key Social Demographics ..................................................................................................... 14 3.1.1 Population ............................................................................................................................ 14 3.1.1.1 Gender, Age and Race ................................................................................................. 15 3.1.1.2 Households .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]