DOCSLIB.ORG

ITS Projects Name Description

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ITS Projects Name Description ITS Projects Name Description MTA Bridges and Tunnels AW35 Authority Wide Weather Recording Systems MTA Bridges and Tunnels AW36 Agency Wide Traffc Camera Upgrade (Analog to IP) MTA Bridges and Tunnels AW52A TRANSMIT System Upgrades MTA Bridges and Tunnels AW52B Queue Warning System MTA Bridges and Tunnels AW66 New Operations Command Center and Systems of System (which includes ATMS and Safety Systems). MTA Bridges and Tunnels AW67 Over Height Vehicle Detection System at QMT and HCT. MTA Bridges and Tunnels AW80 Agency Wide VMS upgrade MTA Bridges and Tunnels BB28 HCT Tunnel Rehabilitation - Lane Lane Use Signal Control, in-tunnel VMS, IP camera, in-tunnel lighting and code call etc MTA Bridges and Tunnels Computer Aid Computer Aided Dispatch MTA Bridges and Tunnels QM81 QMT Facility TMC, Backup TMC at QMT and HCT MTA Bridges and Tunnels QMT40 QMT Tunnel Rehabilitation - Lane Use Signal Control, in-tunnel VMS, IP camera, in-tunnel lighting and code call etc. MTA Bridges and Tunnels SHM Agency Wide Structural Health Monitoring and Weigh In Motion (WIM). MTA Bridges and Tunnels VN11 VN - Lower Gowanus Roadway and Sign Structure Improvement - ITS elements include replacement of VMS, new changeble message signs, and Lane Control Signals. MTA LIRR East Side Access The East Side Access project will connect the Long Island Rail Road's (LIRR) Main and Port Washington lines in Queens to a new LIRR terminal beneath Grand Central Terminal in Manhattan. The new connection will increase the LIRR's capacity into Manhattan, MTA NYC Transit 7 Subway Extension The Subway Extension will bring the Flushing Line to 34th Street & 11th Avenue, at the heart of what will be Manhattan's newest neighborhood. The 7 subway extension will make it possible for new housing, restaurants and entertainment to grow on the Far MTA NYC Transit Automatic Passenger Develop and furnish automated passenger counting system for a large subset of NYCT buses system-wide to improve efficiency of operations. Automatic passenger counting is one of three on-bus applications currently targeted for development. NYMTC TIP proj MTA NYC Transit Fulton Center MTA Capital Construction is building the new Fulton Center in Lower Manhattan, improving connections between, and to, six existing Lower Manhattan subway stations. The Fulton Center will serve as an essential transportation and retail hub in Lower Manhat MTA NYC Transit Implementation of Co Various projects to support the implementation of communications-based train control for the system. Includes the following projects (from NYMTC TIP): MW38- 1456, MW38-1806; MW38-1898; MW38-1899; MW38-1949; MW38-6185; MW38- 6822; MW56-1806; MW56-1811; MW56 MTA NYC Transit Second Avenue Subw The Second Avenue Subway project will include a two-track line along Second Avenue from 125th Street to the Financial District in Lower Manhattan. It will also include a connection from Second Avenue through the 63rd Street tunnel to existing tracks for s NYC DOT Accessible Pedestrian Signal NYCDOT's Accessible Pedestrian Signals (APS) are devices affixed to pedestrian signal poles to assist blind or low vision pedestrians in crossing the street. APSs are wired to a pedestrian signal and send audible and vibro-tactile indications when pedest NYC DOT Brooklyn Bridge Active Traffic To improve efficiency of surface transportation systems in the downtown Brooklyn area, NYCDOT is developing an integrated traffic control system conforming to the Advanced Traffic Demand Management (ATDM) framework. In addition, an integrated traffic cont New York City Sub-Regional ITS Architecture 2 ITS Projects Page 1 of 5 Name Description NYC DOT Connected Vehicle Pilot In 2015, USDOT announced the selection of three connected vehicle deployment sites as Wave 1 participants in the Connected Vehicle Pilot Deployment Program. The three sites collectively envision a broad spectrum of applications enabled by connected vehicl NYC DOT Cross Island Parkway This project will implement an ITS System along the Cross Island Parkway. The project will include installation of fiber, CCTV, VMS, and sensors along the Cross Island Parkway from the Whitestone Expressway in Queens to the Belt Parkway. NYC DOT Flushing Active Traffic Manag To improve efficiency of surface transportation systems in Flushing area, NYCDOT is developing an integrated traffic control system conforming to the Advanced Traffic Demand Management (ATDM) framework. In addition, an integrated traffic control system is NYC DOT GPS Based Traffic Data City-wide GPS based traffic data. NYC DOT Green Cabinet Update the cabinets for the Advanced Signal Traffic Controllers (ASTC) for 48 vDC. NYC DOT Henry Hudson Pkwy This project will implement an ITS System along the Henry Hudson Parkway. The project will include installation of fiber, CCTV, VMS, and sensors along the Henry Hudson Parkway from the George Washington Bridge to the Dyckman Street Entrance/Exit Ramp.. NYC DOT ICM495 Integrated Corridor Management (ICM) for interjurisdictional planing and operational managemetn of Interstate/Route-495 from the New Jersey Turnpike, through the Lincoln Tunnel, Manhattan, the Queens Midtown Tunnel, to the Cross Island Parkway in Queens, NYC DOT Korean War Veterans Pkwy R This project aims to implement an ITS system consisting of 12 traffic surveillance cameras and 12 vehicle detection equipment 2 variable message signs, 4 Travel time sign, 4 RFID transponder/reader, 1 HAR, communication equipment, and central software equ NYC DOT LinkNYC LinkNYC is a new communications network that is replacing New York City pay phone with state-of-the-art kiosks called Links. Links provide high-speed gigabit Wi-Fi, phone calls to anywhere in the U.S.., device charging, a touch screen tablet for access t NYC DOT Manhattan Bridge This project will implement an ITS System on the Manhattan Bridge. The project will include installation of fiber, CCTV, VMS, and sensors on the Manhattan Bridge. NYC DOT Manhattan Congestion Projec To install ITS field equipment to reassess congestion in Manhattan below 96th Street. ITS field equipment includes video detection systems, CCTV cameras, and RFID readers. NYC DOT Midtown in Motion In July 2011, NYCDOT commissioned the Midtown in Motion (MIM) project, which included Active Traffic Management (ATM), some operational improvements (e.g. changes in lane usage), and enforcement. This was focused on improving mobility in the core of Manha NYC DOT Mobile Parking Payment This project is the continued maintenance and upgrade of the mobile parking payment system (pay by cell application). The mobile application allows a user to make a payment to the NYC DOT parking payment system, allows an (New York City Police Department NYC DOT New England Thruway This project will implement an ITS System along the New England Thruway. The project will include installation of fiber, CCTV, VMS, and sensors along the New England Thruway from the Whitestone Expressway/Bruckner Interchange to the City Line in the Bro NYC DOT Parking by Virtual Permitting This project will provide on-street parking enforcement by virtual permits. Using License Plate Readers (LPRs) installed on a mobile device or a vehicle, license plates will be read and checked for valid parking permits. This project will also unify pay NYC DOT Queensboro Bridge This project will implement an ITS System on the Queensboro Bridge. The project will include installation of fiber, CCTV, VMS, and sensors on the Queensboro Bridge. New York City Sub-Regional ITS Architecture 2 ITS Projects Page 2 of 5 Name Description NYC DOT Real Time Passenger Informa NYCDOT is responsible for replacing standard bus stop poles with Real-Time Passenger Information (RTPI) displays both in visual format and with push-button audible technology to provide information on bus routes and real-time bus arrival information. The NYC DOT Signal Coordination Improvements in ITS Signal Coordination NYC DOT Smart Lights The Smart Lights system builds upon DOT's existing investments in ITS infrastructure - new advanced traffic controllers, NYCWiN, a NYC centralized Traffic Control System and the adaptive control system (ACDSS). ACDSS is a multi-regime, variable objective, NYC DOT Third Avenue Bridge This project will implement an ITS System on the Third Avenue Bridge. The project will include installation of fiber, CCTV, VMS, and sensors on the Third Avenue Bridge. NYC DOT Transit Signal Prioritization Working in partnership with MTA, NYCDOT is actively implementing Select Bus Service (SBS) features to hep improve bus reliability and travel time performance citywide. TSP is one of the features NYCDOT implements as part of the city's SBS expansion effort NYC DOT Williamsburg Bridge This project will implement an ITS System on the Williamsburg Bridge. The project will include installation of fiber, CCTV, VMS, and sensors on the Williamsburg Bridge. NYC DOT X50160 Jackie Robinson Par This project will implement an ITS System along the Jackie Robinson Parkway. The project will include installation of fiber, CCTV, VMS, and sensors along the Jackie Robinson Parkway from the Grand Central Parkway and the Whitestone Expressway in Queens t NYC DOT X50162 Belt Parkway This project will install 25 miles of fiber along the Belt Parkway from 65st Street in Brooklyn to the Southern State Parkway in Queens. Additional ITS Equipment will be installed. TIP ID: X50162 Reference: STIP 2011-2014 NYC DOT X77032 Brooklyn Bridge This project will implement an ITS System consisting of 1.4 miles of fiber cable along the Brooklyn Bridge, 16 traffic surveillance cameras, 16 RTMS (or a similar style of detection equipment) and 6 E-ZPass Readers for energy efficiency in Brooklyn. TI NYC DOT X80670 NYC This project will coordinate Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) deployment in New York City (CIDNY) is a multi-year research, deployment and training project focusing on three program areas: Congestion Management, Emergency Management, and NTCIP/ITS NYC DOT X80674 NYC This project provides for ITS signal timing for the outer boroughs. This project would retime and additional 1500 traffic signals for major routes in the four outer boroughs.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fixing the L Train and Managing the Shutdown a Community Consensus Proposal
    Fixing the L Train and Managing the Shutdown A Community Consensus Proposal November 2016 Contents Executive Summary / 3 Summary of Recommendations / 3 Introduction / 6 Impact on Commuters and Residents / 8 Implications/how to prepare for the shutdown / 10 Impact on Businesses / 11 How much do local businesses depend on the L train? / 11 How to prepare for the shutdown / 11 Providing the Best Travel Alternatives / 12 Prepare adjacent subway lines for higher ridership / 12 New rapid bus services with dedicated preferential treatments and auto-free zones / 13 Transform streets in Brooklyn to better connect people and cyclists to transit / 17 Improve ferry service and reduce fares to serve Williamsburg residents / 18 Making the Most of the Shutdown: Transforming the L Train / 19 Capital improvements at five stations / 20 Timing and funding / 20 Procurement and design / 21 An Inclusive Process / 22 Community Profiles /23 Manhattan / 24 Williamsburg/Greenpoint / 25 Bushwick/Ridgewood / 26 East New York/Brownsville/Canarsie / 27 2 Fixing the L Train and Managing the Shutdown: A Community Consensus Proposal | November 2016 Executive Summary The Metropolitan Transportation Authority has said it will shut ⊲ State Senator Martin M. Dilan down the L train tunnels under the East River for more than a ⊲ Council Member Stephen Levin year to repair the severe damage caused by Superstorm Sandy. ⊲ Council Member Antonio Reynoso That is grim news for the hundreds of thousands of New Yorkers ⊲ Manhattan Borough President Gale Brewer who rely on the L and who will have few easy alternatives to get ⊲ Brooklyn Borrough President Eric L. Adams to where they’re going every day.
    [Show full text]
  • FY 2022 EXECUTIVE BUDGET CITYWIDE SAVINGS PROGRAM—5 YEAR VALUE (City $ in 000’S)
    The City of New York Executive Budget Fiscal Year 2022 Bill de Blasio, Mayor Mayor's Office of Management and Budget Jacques Jiha, Ph.D., Director Message of the Mayor The City of New York Executive Budget Fiscal Year 2022 Bill de Blasio, Mayor Mayor’s Office of Management and Budget Jacques Jiha, Ph.D., Director April 26, 2021 Message of the Mayor Contents BUDGET AND FINANCIAL PLAN SUMMARY Budget and Financial Plan Overview .......................................................................... 3 State and Federal Agenda ........................................................................................................... 4 Sandy Recovery .......................................................................................................................... 6 Contract Budget .......................................................................................................................... 9 Community Board Participation in the Budget Process ............................................................ 10 Economic Outlook .................................................................................................. 11 Tax Revenue .......................................................................................................... 27 Miscellaneous Receipts ............................................................................................ 52 Capital Budget ........................................................................................................ 58 Financing Program .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding the “Platform” River 15 Hudson Yards 12Th Ave
    35 HUDSON BUILDING HUDSON YARDS HUDSON YARDS UNDERSTANDING THE “PLATFORM” RIVER 15 HUDSON YARDS 12TH AVE. To build the first half of Hudson Yards, a “PODIUM” WESTERN 10-acre “platform” was constructed over the 30 HUDSON STRUCTURE: PLATFORM YARDS Eastern Rail Yard of the Long Island Rail Road. 30 HUDSON YARDS A similar structure will be built over the UPPER TRUSSES Columns and other support 10 HUDSON YARDS Western Rail Yard. When completed, the two Tall trusses support hung structures land between the rail HUDSON platforms will support approximately three sections of this building, which lines—and were placed to avoid YARDS PODIUM quarters of the 28-acre primary development. connects 10 Hudson Yards and underground utilities—while 34TH ST. 11TH AVE. The foundations of the buildings that sit on 30 Hudson Yards. trusses supporting the tower’s 33RD ST. the Eastern Rail Yard platform extend through south face span the tracks. HIGH LINE EASTERN 30TH ST. and rise above it, while the platform itself is PLATFORM supported by 300 caissons of varying sizes 10TH AVE. drilled into bedrock between the tracks. GLOSSARY Caisson. A large-diameter pipe drilled into rock and filled with concrete. “PODIUM” BASE STRUCTURE OVER STRUCTURE Eastern Rail Yard Platform. A 10-acre deck THE YARDS The location and construction built above 30 LIRR tracks that supports of the columns supporting this Trusses bridge over this narrow more than five acres of open space, four building—which is home to a section of the rail yard, where towers, a cultural center and one million collection of shops and there was no room for caissons.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 COMBINED CONTINUING DISCLOSURE FILINGS PURSUANT to SEC RULE 15C2-12 Relating to METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY Dedic
    2019 COMBINED CONTINUING DISCLOSURE FILINGS PURSUANT TO SEC RULE 15c2-12 relating to METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY Dedicated Tax Fund Bonds Transportation Revenue Bonds State Service Contract Bonds Special Obligation Taxable Refunding Bonds Hudson Rail Yards Trust Obligations and TRIBOROUGH BRIDGE AND TUNNEL AUTHORITY (MTA BRIDGES AND TUNNELS) General Revenue Bonds Subordinate Revenue Bonds Dated: April 30, 2019 [THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] INTRODUCTION This book contains the 2019 Combined Continuing Disclosure Filings prepared by Metropolitan Transportation Authority (“MTA”) and Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority (“TBTA”) pursuant to various written undertakings made to assist the underwriters in complying with their obligations in accordance with SEC Rule 15c2-12 in connection with the following credits: • MTA Transportation Revenue Bonds, • TBTA General Revenue Bonds, • TBTA Subordinate Revenue Bonds, • MTA Dedicated Tax Fund Bonds, • MTA State Service Contract Bonds, • MTA Special Obligation Taxable Refunding Bonds, and • MTA Hudson Rail Yards Trust Obligations. A roadmap to the continuing disclosure information that MTA or TBTA has contractually agreed to update, in accordance with the respective continuing disclosure agreements in official statements, describing where the materials required may be found in MTA’s Annual Disclosure Statement is set forth at the end of this Introduction. This Annual Information booklet contains the following information: PART I contains the MTA Annual Disclosure Statement (“ADS”). The ADS describes the Related Entities, and includes the information necessary to meet the requirements of the continuing disclosure agreements under MTA and TBTA official statements, offering circulars and remarketing circulars, as applicable, for all credits. PART II includes the following, which are also part of the Annual Continuing Disclosure Filings: • Tab 1 lists, by designation, the various issues of securities outstanding for all credits.
    [Show full text]
  • Hudson Yards FGEIS
    96TH ST. 96TH ST. BROADWAY 86TH ST. 86TH ST. RIVERSIDE PARK 72ND ST. 72ND ST. WEST NEW YORK QUEENS CENTRAL PARK ROOSEVELT ISLAND AMSTERDAM AVE. CENTRAL PARK WEST QUEENSBORO BRIDGE 57TH ST. DEWITT CLINTON PARK FIFTH AVE. FIRST AVE. SIXTH AVE. THIRD AVE. TENTH AVE. EIGHTH AVE. SEVENTH AVE. WEEHAWKEN 49TH ST. 42ND ST. Area of Proposed ROUTE 9A PARK AVE. Action 34TH ST. HUDSON RIVER B R EAST RIVER O A D W A Y PARK AVE. SOUTH 23RD ST. UNION SQUARE 14TH ST. F O U R T H A V E . F D R D R I TOMPKINS V HOBOKEN SQUARE AVE. C E PARK WASHINGTON SQUARE PARK N ST. HOUSTO EAST RIDGE SBURG B B RIVER WILLIAM O PARK W V E A R R Y Y ST. I ANC C DEL K S T . ST. GRAND Y H C A U AN W AL D D ST. A S RO O B N ST A W S E T E . S T S T Y . A W W O Y R D CITY HALL K . A A R R A D W PARK O P R D R VE A B I R O T T R S S A E B E BATTERY PARK CITY W M A N H A FULTON ST. TT BRO AN OKL B WTC YN R BRI ID DGE G NEW JERSEY E WALL ST. BROOKLYN BATTERY 0 2000 4000 Feet PARK Legend Project Area Boundary Location of Proposed Action Figure 1-1 NO. 7 SUBWAY EXTENSION-HUDSON YARDS REZONING AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM 92 W.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Railroad Administration Record of Decision for the East Side Access Project
    Federal Railroad Administration Record of Decision For the East Side Access Project September 2012 SUMMARY OF DECISION This is a Record of Decision (ROD) of the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), an operating administration of the U.S. Department of Transportation, regarding the East Side Access (ESA) Project. FRA has prepared this ROD in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the Council on Environmental Quality’s (CEQ) regulations implementing NEPA, and FRA’s Procedures for Considering Environmental Impacts. The Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) filed an application with the FRA for a loan to finance eligible elements of the ESA Project through the Railroad Rehabilitation and Improvement Financing (RRIF) Program. The ESA Project is the MTA’s largest system expansion in over 100 years. The ESA Project will expand the Long Island Rail Road (LIRR) services by connecting Queens and Long Island with East Midtown Manhattan. With direct LIRR service to Midtown East, the LIRR will further increase its market share of commuters by saving up to 40 minutes per day in subway/bus/sidewalk travel time for commuters who work on Manhattan’s East Side. The ESA Project was previously considered in an environmental impact statement (EIS) prepared by the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) in May 2001 and subsequent FTA reevaluations and an environmental assessment of changes in the ESA Project. Construction of the ESA Project has been ongoing since 2001. FRA has reviewed the environmental impacts for the ESA Project identified in the FTA March 2001 Final EIS, subsequent FTA Reevaluations, and the 2006 Supplemental EA/FONSI (collectively, the “2001 EIS”) for the ESA Project and adopted it pursuant to CEQ regulations (40 CFR 1506.3).
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Summary
    Executive Summary A. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT The Federal Transit Administration (FTA) and the Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA), in cooperation with MTA New York City Transit (NYCT),* are undertaking a Major In- vestment Study (MIS) and Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) to consider options for improving transit access and mobility on Manhattan’s East Side. The alternatives would provide service to an area including Lower Manhattan, the Lower East Side, East Midtown, the Upper East Side, and East Harlem. A secondary area, just west of the primary area south of 59th Street, is also included in the study. After considerable study and evaluation of many options, four alter- natives are addressed in this MIS/DEIS: No Build; Transportation Systems Management (TSM), including dedicated bus lanes on First and Second Avenues; a new East Side subway extension on Second Avenue north of 63rd Street and continuing on the Broadway express tracks down to Lower Manhattan; and the same new subway supplemented by new light rail transit (LRT) serving the Lower East Side and Lower Manhattan. The need for transit improvement on Manhattan’s East Side is clear. In the primary area, only the Lexington Avenue line (4, 5, 6 lines) provides full north-south rapid transit service. South of 64th Street (primarily in East Midtown), several east-west lines (Q, N, R, E, F, 7, Shuttle, and L) cross the area and connect to other north-south services. The N and R trains provide north-south service along Broadway from 57th Street to Lower Manhattan. Several subway lines serve the Lower East Side (F, B, D, Q, J, M and Z), but these do not offer direct north-south service on the East Side, and their stations are at some distance from residents living in the easterly portions of the neighborhood.
    [Show full text]
  • April 18, 2001 Mr. Peter Kalikow Chairman
    April 18, 2001 Mr. Peter Kalikow Chairman Metropolitan Transportation Authority 347 Madison Avenue New York, NY 10017 Re: F and G Train Re-Routing & New V Train Routing Dear Mr. Kalikow, The Queens Civic Congress, representing 99 civic associations throughout the Borough of Queens, wishes to protest the planned new V train routing and the re-routing of the F and G trains. We would like to document our rationale and offer a suggestion that would meet the rigid premises outlined below. Basic Mass Transportation Premises of the Queens Civic Congress: *A plan to improve service to one community should not result in the diminishment of services to another community. *A new train line should enhance, but not curtail services to existing train lines. *A plan should encourage people to use mass transit and not create obstacles that would instead encourage existing riders to take their cars. G TRAIN: We Recommend MTA Rescind Court Square Termination Plan. We are happy to hear that you are rethinking the original plan to eliminate the current G train route between Court Square and Forest Hills. The G train, which serves northern Brooklyn and central Queens, has seen a 33% increase in ridership in recent years. The plan to terminate the G train at Court Square will add travel time for riders and thus encourage them to abandon the line in favor of autos. A further inconvenience to riders making the connection to the E and F trains at Court Square requires climbing a full set of stairs, walking a city block underground and descending another set of stairs.
    [Show full text]
  • 2012-02-01.Pdf
    CONTENTSCONTENTS February 2012 On the Cover Two Become One CH2M HILL, Halcrow combine forces. By Jim Rush Features Advanced Assessment 20 New technology can help reduce risk of damage to structures. By Thomas A. Winant 16 Threading the Eye 22 Jay Dee/Coluccio JV completes Brightwater contract. By Jack Burke Miami-Dade Government Cut 26 Pipeline Replacement Microtunneling, HDD used to replace shallow utility mainlines. By Robin Dill, Ken Watson and Eduardo A. Vega Technical Paper 30 Ventilating Partially Submerged Subway Stations By Rob States, Dan McKinney and Bruce Dandie The Big Bore 32 USA Latest to Use Large-diameter TBM for Highway Project 22 By Jim Rush Columns Editor’s Message.................................... 4 TBM: Tunnel Business Magazine (ISSN 1553-2917) is published six times per year. Copyright 2011, Benjamin Media Inc., P.O. Box 190, Peninsula, OH 44264. USA All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted by any Departments means without written permission from the publisher. One year subscription rates: complimentary in the United States and Canada, and $69 in other foreign countries. Single copy rate: $10. Subscriptions and classified advertising should be addressed Business Briefs ....................................... 6 to the Peninsula office. POSTMASTER: send Changes of Address to TBM: Tunnel Business Magazine, P.O. Box 190, Peninsula OH 44264 USA. Global News ....................................... 13 Canadian Subscriptions: Canada Post Agreement Number 7178957. Send change UCA of SME Newsletter ............................ 14 address information and blocks of undeliverable copies to Canada Express; 7686 Kimble Street, Units 21 & 22, Mississauga, ON L5S 1E9 Canada Upcoming Projects ................................ 34 Calendar........................................... 41 Ad Index ..........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Hudson Yards FGEIS
    Appendix Y References Appleseed, Remodeling the Fashion District. February 2003, p. 14 Beranek, L.L. et al. 1988. Noise and Vibration Control. Institute of Noise Control Engineering. Bolt Beranek and Newman. 1973. Fundamentals and Abatement of Highway Traffic Noise. NTIS PB- 222-703. Boreman, J. and H.M. Austin. 1985. Production and harvest of anadromous striped bass stocks along the Atlantic coast. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc.114:3-7. Boss, Shira. “Westward Hoe!” Crain’s New York Business. December 9, 2002. Bram, Jason. “New York City’s Economy before and after September 11.” Current Issues in Economics and Finance: Second District Highlights. Federal Reserve Bank of New York. February 2003. Bram, Jason and Michael Anderson. “Declining Manufacturing Employment in the New York-New Jersey Region: 1969-99.” Current Issues in Economics and Finance: Second District Highlights. Federal Reserve Bank of New York. January 2001. Bram, Jason et al. “Has September 11 Affected New York City’s Growth Potential?” Federal Reserve Bank of New York Economic Policy Review. November 2002. Cartwright, R.A. 2002. History and Hydrologic Effects of Ground-Water Use in Kings, Queens, and Western Nassau Counties, Long Island, New York, 1800’s through 1997. U.S. Geological Survey Water Resources Investigations Report 01-4096. USGS, Coram, NY, in cooperation with New York City Department of Environmental Protection). City of New York, Rules of the City of New York, Traffic Rules and Regulations, Volume II, Chapter 4-13. Clinkenbeard et al., 2002. Lessons Learned from the California Geological Survey’s Recent Activity to Develop Guideline for Naturally Occurring Asbestos Investigations.
    [Show full text]
  • Existing Grand Central Terminal and Approach Tracks
    ASSESSMENTOF THEUPPERLEVELLOOPALTERNATIVE FORTHEMANHATTANPORTION OFTHEEASTSIDEACCESSPROJECT Preparedfor: InstituteforRational UrbanMobility,Inc. NewYork Preparedby: DelcanCorporation Toronto,Canada InAssociationwith: MichaelSchabas London,England October2004 CB2273PMA00 Assessment of The Upper Level Loop Alternative For the Manhattan Portion Of the East Side Access Project Prepared for: Institute for Rational Urban Mobility, Inc. George Haikalis, President P.O. Box 409, New York, NY 10014 Phone: (212) 475-3394 Prepared by: Delcan Corporation 133 Wynford Drive Toronto, Canada M3C 1K1 In Association with: Michael Schabas Independent Consultant London, England October 2004 CB2273 PMA00 Assessment of the Upper Level Loop Alternative For The Manhattan Portion of the East Side Access Project Table of Contents Background................................................................................................................................................. 1 1. Description of the MTA Preferred Scheme and the Upper Level Loop Alternative............... 3 2. Technical and Operational Assessment of the ULLA ................................................................ 5 2.1 Track Alignment................................................................................................................. 5 2.1.1 General.................................................................................................................. 5 2.1.2 Inbound Track Connection...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 7 Subway Extension -- Hudson Yards Rezoning and Development Program 2004 Network Simulation Study
    No. 7 Secaucus Extension Feasibility Analysis Final Report April 2013 Prepared by: Prepared for: The City of New York The City of New York convened a bi-state, multi- agency group to study the feasibility of extending the No. 7 Subway to Secaucus, New Jersey. The study group included representatives of the Governor’s offices of New York and New Jersey, Mayor’s Office of the City of New York, New York Metropolitan Transportation Authority, the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, NJ TRANSIT, Hudson Yards Development Corporation, the New York City Department of City Planning, the New York City Department of Transportation, and the New Jersey Department of Transportation. No. 7 Secaucus Extension Feasibility Analysis Final Report Table of Contents FOREWORD ............................................................................................................................................................... I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................................. III PROJECT GOALS AND OBJECTIVES CONSISTENT WITH THE ARC PROJECT ........................................................................................ IV CONCEPTUAL FEASIBILITY STUDY ....................................................................................................................................... V 1 INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]