The Soviet Program for Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Explosions

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Soviet Program for Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Explosions UCRL-ID- 1244 10 f The Soviet Program for Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Explosions Milo D. Nordyke July 24,1996 This is an informal report intended primarily for internal or limited external 8 distribution. The opinions and conclusions stated are those of the author and may or may not be those of the Laboratory. Work performed under the auspices of the US.Department of Energy by the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under Contract W-7405-ENG-48. 1 'b DISCLAIMER This document was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor the University of Calihrnia nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed,. or represents that ik use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manuEacturer, or othmise, does not necessarily constitute or imply ik endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or the Univdty of California The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or the University of California, and shall not be used for advertisingor product endorsement purposes. This report has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to and antractors from the Office of ScientificDOE andDOE Technid Information P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831 Prices available &om (615)576-8401, FTS 626-8401 Available to the public from the National Technical Information Service U.S. Department of Commerce 5285 Port Royal Rd., Springfield, VA 22161 DISCLAIMER Portions of this document may be illegible in electronic image products. Images are produced from the best available original document. Mih, D. Nordyke 1. Early History The concept of utilizing the weapons of war to serve the peaceful pursuits of mankind is as old as civilization itself. Perhaps the most famous reference to this basic desire is recorded in the Book of Micah where the great prophet Isiah called upon his people "to turn your spears into pitchforks and your swords into plowshares." As the scientists at Los Alamos worked on developing the world's fust atomic bomb, thoughts of how this tremendous new source of energy could be used for peaceful purposes generally focused on using the thermal energy generated by the slow fission of uranium in a reactor, such as those being used to produce Pluto- to drive elwcpower stations. However, being scientists in a new, exciting field, it was impossible to avoid letting their minds wander from the task at hand to other scientific or non-military uses for the bombs themselves. During the Manhattan Project, Otto Frisch, one of the pioneers in the development of nuclear fission process in the 1930s, first suggested using an atomic explosion as a source for a large quantities of neutrons which could used in scientific experiments designed to expand their understanding of nuclear physics. After the war was over, many grandiose ideas appeared in the popular press onhow this new sourceofenergy should be harnessed to servemankind. Not to be left out of the growing enthusiasm for peaceful uses of atomic energy, the Soviet Union added their visions to the public record. In November 1949, shortly after the test of their first nuclear device on September 23 1949, Andrei Vishinsky, the Soviet representative to the UN, delivered a statement justifying their efforts to develop their own nuclear weapons capability. In poetic but somewhat overblownrhebrichesai& Uthe Soviet Union did not use atomic energy for the purpose of accumulating stockpiles of atomic bombs,........it was using atomic energy for purposes of its own domestic economy: blowing up mountains, changing the course of rivers, irrigating deserts, charting newpathsa€lifeinregionSuntroddenbybumnnfodnl . A few years later, a Russiau engineer, frofessor G. I. Pohvskii wrote: Nations Gene4 Assembly .. 1 United Fo- 1November 10,1949, p. 188. "progressive science claims that it is possible to utilize the noble force of the explosions builder for peaceful purposes....With the help of directional esplosions one can straighten out the beds of large rivers...construct gigantic dams....cut canals.....Indeed, the perspectives aioclosedduetothe newrrtomicenerggareunlimited.";! However, very few of the articles written in the late 40s and early 50s had concrete ideas on how the explosive force of the bombs themselves could be used for scientific purposes or to transform the landscape and alter the character of geological formations deep under the earth. One of the first was written by Fred Reines, a young physicist who had come to Los Alamos in 1944 to work on the nuclear weapons program. In June of 1950, he wrote a short article for the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists examining the possibilities of using atomic explosives for a few large-scale earth-moving applications such as making canals, mining, breaking up icebergs and melting the polar icecap. In general, his outlook was rather pessimistic, concluding that "such use8 appear at best to be extremely limited in scope, owing to the radioactivity hazard aosociated with atomic expiosions."3 With the development of thermonuclear devices, new ideas began to ferment in the minds of the bomb-designers. Thermonuclear devices still required a small fission trigger but, since the thermonuclear fuel consisted of relatively cheap deuterium and lithium and produced almost no long-lived radioactive by-products, they offered the possibility of an order of magnitude decrease in both the cost of an explosive and the amuunt of radioactivity associated with a given total yield. The detonation by the Soviet Union of their first thermonuclear explosion on August 12, 1953 led President Eisenhower to the determination that he needed to take the initiative in dealing with the political aspects of the nuclear arms race. Toward this end, on December 8, 1953 President Eisenhower delivered his now-famous Atoms for Peace speech at the U.N. calling for &...more than the mere reduction or elimination of atomic materialsfor military purposes, It is not enough to take this weapon out of the hands of their soldiers. It must be put into the hands of those who will know bow to strip its military casing and adapt it to the arts of peace... this greatest of destructive forces can be developed into a great boon for the benefit ofaumankidn Who can doubt, it the entire body of the world's scientists and engineers had adequate amounts of fissionabie material with which to test and develop their ideas, that this capability would rapidly be tm&d into universrrl, &cienb and ecowrm'c usage.- This dramatic and stimng call to the world community to begin the process of . applying this powerful new source of energy to the peaceful uses of mankind served as a powerful stimulant within the nuclear physics community and nuclear power 2 G. 1. Pokrovskii, &Te- Molo&zhi, 9,1954. 3~k~~Of~.. -7 BJletin OfAtOmic S~hti~tS,huse, 1950, p. 171-2. 2 I industry. Following up Eisenhower's Atoms for Peace speech, in early 1954 the U.S. proposed thlt the U.N. sponsor a Conference on the Peacelid Uses of Atomic Energy. The first of four such conferences was ultimately was held in Geneva, Switzerland in August of 1955. It was the largest scientific meeting in the world held up to that time with over 2500 participants in attendance; over 1000 technical papers were presented. For many Soviet scientists, it was their first opportunity to attend a scientific meeting outside the Soviet Union and to meet their colleagues from the waL4 While there were papers presented at the Geneva Conference the peaceful uses of nuclear noexplosions, the general enthusiasm for the integrationon of peaceful uses of nuclear energy into the fabric of society and the declassification of a broad spectrum of information about the attributes and effects of nuclear fission processes gave rise to an increasing interest in such ideas, particularly within the nuclearweaponscommunity. Fired by this enthusiasm, in the Spring of 1956 a French scientist Camille Rougeron wrote a monograph conjuring up images of a wide variety of applications for such explosions - building dams, changing the course of rivers, melting glaciers, breaking-up ice jams, changing the climate, constructing underground power plants driven by the heat of thermonuclear explosions, and breaking rock for mining.5 Rougeron's "dreams" added little in the way of quantitative analysis of such applications, but they did serve to raise the expectation of the general public for some peaceful benefit from the nuclear tests being fired in the Pacific and at the Nevada Test Site. At about the same time, the Soviet engineer G. 1. Pokrovskii again wrote of his vision of using compact, powerful, low cost of nuclear explosives for removing overbur&en fiom valuable ore deposits or excavating canals: "With the data now available, we can say that radioactive contamination in a nuclear explosion should not be considered an insurmountable obstacle to the use of such explosives in mining and construction. On the basis of the many advantages of nuclear explosions, we conclude that the time is ripe to begin actual experiments in this Md9 IL The us. Plowshare Program In spite of Pokrovskii's enthusiasm, little of substance was done over the next ten years in the Soviet Union to further explore his vision. In the U.S., however, the AEC formally established a program for non-military uses of nuclear explosions in 4 Goldschmidt, Bertrard, The Atomic CO~~X,American Nuclear Society, 1982, p.257- 62 .. 5 CamilleRoUgeron, -de J:F- ---.mi- - EditioDSmger- Levrault, Paris, 1956.
Recommended publications
  • Bob Farquhar
    1 2 Created by Bob Farquhar For and dedicated to my grandchildren, their children, and all humanity. This is Copyright material 3 Table of Contents Preface 4 Conclusions 6 Gadget 8 Making Bombs Tick 15 ‘Little Boy’ 25 ‘Fat Man’ 40 Effectiveness 49 Death By Radiation 52 Crossroads 55 Atomic Bomb Targets 66 Acheson–Lilienthal Report & Baruch Plan 68 The Tests 71 Guinea Pigs 92 Atomic Animals 96 Downwinders 100 The H-Bomb 109 Nukes in Space 119 Going Underground 124 Leaks and Vents 132 Turning Swords Into Plowshares 135 Nuclear Detonations by Other Countries 147 Cessation of Testing 159 Building Bombs 161 Delivering Bombs 178 Strategic Bombers 181 Nuclear Capable Tactical Aircraft 188 Missiles and MIRV’s 193 Naval Delivery 211 Stand-Off & Cruise Missiles 219 U.S. Nuclear Arsenal 229 Enduring Stockpile 246 Nuclear Treaties 251 Duck and Cover 255 Let’s Nuke Des Moines! 265 Conclusion 270 Lest We Forget 274 The Beginning or The End? 280 Update: 7/1/12 Copyright © 2012 rbf 4 Preface 5 Hey there, I’m Ralph. That’s my dog Spot over there. Welcome to the not-so-wonderful world of nuclear weaponry. This book is a journey from 1945 when the first atomic bomb was detonated in the New Mexico desert to where we are today. It’s an interesting and sometimes bizarre journey. It can also be horribly frightening. Today, there are enough nuclear weapons to destroy the civilized world several times over. Over 23,000. “Enough to make the rubble bounce,” Winston Churchill said. The United States alone has over 10,000 warheads in what’s called the ‘enduring stockpile.’ In my time, we took care of things Mano-a-Mano.
    [Show full text]
  • The New Nuclear Forensics: Analysis of Nuclear Material for Security
    THE NEW NUCLEAR FORENSICS Analysis of Nuclear Materials for Security Purposes edited by vitaly fedchenko The New Nuclear Forensics Analysis of Nuclear Materials for Security Purposes STOCKHOLM INTERNATIONAL PEACE RESEARCH INSTITUTE SIPRI is an independent international institute dedicated to research into conflict, armaments, arms control and disarmament. Established in 1966, SIPRI provides data, analysis and recommendations, based on open sources, to policymakers, researchers, media and the interested public. The Governing Board is not responsible for the views expressed in the publications of the Institute. GOVERNING BOARD Sven-Olof Petersson, Chairman (Sweden) Dr Dewi Fortuna Anwar (Indonesia) Dr Vladimir Baranovsky (Russia) Ambassador Lakhdar Brahimi (Algeria) Jayantha Dhanapala (Sri Lanka) Ambassador Wolfgang Ischinger (Germany) Professor Mary Kaldor (United Kingdom) The Director DIRECTOR Dr Ian Anthony (United Kingdom) Signalistgatan 9 SE-169 70 Solna, Sweden Telephone: +46 8 655 97 00 Fax: +46 8 655 97 33 Email: [email protected] Internet: www.sipri.org The New Nuclear Forensics Analysis of Nuclear Materials for Security Purposes EDITED BY VITALY FEDCHENKO OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS 2015 1 Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, United Kingdom Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide. Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries © SIPRI 2015 The moral rights of the authors have been asserted All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of SIPRI, or as expressly permitted by law, or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organizations.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Weapons, Propaganda, and Cold War Memory Expressed in Film: 1959-1989 Michael A
    James Madison University JMU Scholarly Commons Masters Theses The Graduate School Spring 2016 Their swords, our plowshares: "Peaceful" nuclear weapons, propaganda, and Cold War memory expressed in film: 1959-1989 Michael A. St. Jacques James Madison University Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/master201019 Part of the Cultural History Commons, Defense and Security Studies Commons, History of Science, Technology, and Medicine Commons, Other Film and Media Studies Commons, Political History Commons, and the Soviet and Post-Soviet Studies Commons Recommended Citation St. Jacques, Michael A., "Their swords, our plowshares: "Peaceful" nuclear weapons, propaganda, and Cold War memory expressed in film: 1959-1989" (2016). Masters Theses. 102. https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/master201019/102 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the The Graduate School at JMU Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of JMU Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Their Swords, Our Plowshares: "Peaceful" Nuclear Weapons, Propaganda, and Cold War Memory Expressed in Film: 1949-1989 Michael St. Jacques A thesis submitted to the Graduate Faculty of JAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of Master of Arts History May 2016 FACULTY COMMITTEE: Committee Chair: Dr. Steven Guerrier Committee Members/ Readers: Dr. Maria Galmarini Dr. Alison Sandman Dedication For my wife, my children, my siblings, and all of my family and friends who were so supportive of me continuing my education. At the times when I doubted myself, they never did.
    [Show full text]
  • Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty: Contributing Towards a World Free of Nuclear Weapons by Jean Du Preez 1
    2016-2017 Critical Issues Forum (CIF) Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty: Contributing towards a World Free of Nuclear Weapons by Jean du Preez 1. History of Nuclear Testing, Nuclear Testing and the Arms Race 5. Educational resources to train the next generation of CTBT experts “If the radiance of a thousand suns were to burst at once into the sky, that would be like the splendor of the mighty one. Now I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds“ From the Hindu scripture Bhagavad Gita as recalled by Dr Robert Oppenheimer Trinity test: 16 July 1945 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZuRvBoLu4t0 Absolute Devastation: Hiroshima & Nagasaki Hiroshima Nagasaki 6 August 1945- “Little Boy” 9 August 1945- “Fat Man” 118,000 killed, 80,000 wounded 74,000 killed, 75,000 wounded The Destruction of Hiroshima bomb (13Kt) • 0-1.0 km: 86% killed • 1-2.5 km: 27% killed • 0-1.3 km: prompt radiation zone • 0-2.1 km: 3rd degree burns • 0-2.7 km: 2nd degree burns Heat: 6000 degrees Celcius • 0-0.3 km: 50 psi overpressure – destroys everything • 0-0.7 km: 10 psi - sweep everything in a high-rise building onto streets • 0-1.2 – 1.6 km: 3 - 5 psi - destroy brick houses & shatter windowpanes Testing and the start of the nuclear arms race Trinity Test (20 kt) UK USSR Tsar Bomba USSR JOE Hurricane (57 mt) (22 kt) (25 kt) China tests at Lop Nur 1945 1949 1952 1961 1964 1960 1962 1974 US Mike Hiroshima & (10.4 mt) Blue Little Feller Nagasaki (Davy Crockett) Dessert Rat (0.01 – 0.02 kt) Smiling France test Budha in Algeria (12Kt): India 70Kt For more on nuclear testing over time, see the CTBTO website Scale comparison U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Explosions 1945 -1998
    F( SE0000380 FOA ISSN 1104-9154 DEFENCE RESEARCH User report ESTABLISHMENT sipn STOCKHOLM INTERNATIONAL PEACE RESEARCH INSTITUTE Nuclear Explosions 1945 -1998 Nils-Olov Bergkvist Ragnhild Ferm Division of Systems and Underwater Technology SE-172 90 STOCKHOLM PLEASE BE AWARE THAT ALL OF THE MISSING PAGES IN THIS DOCUMENT WERE ORIGINALLY BLANK The picture on the front cover shows numerous cables laid out at an underground nuclear test location at Yucca Flat, Nevada. Yucca Flat was the principle underground nuclear weapons testing area at the Nevada Test Site, United States. The cranes in the picture were used to lower the cable “down-hole” with the nuclear weapon canister. Scientific data was communicated through the cables to recording trailers on the surface. The tower was used to hold the instrumentation canister; the tower was removed before the nuclear device was detonated. The drill emplacement hole is beneath the tower. The picture has been down-loaded (by permission) from the web-site of Nevada Division of Environmental Protection Bureau of Federal Facilities. DEFENCE RESEARCH ESTABLISHMENT FOA-R-00-01572-180--SE Division of Systems and Underwater Technology July 2000 SE-172 90 STOCKHOLM ISSN 1104-9154 Sweden Nuclear Explosions 1945-1998 Nils-Olov Bergkvist Ragnhild Ferm Distribution: UD (2 ex), UD Ambasaden i Wien, Fö (2 ex), FHS, SIPRI (20 ex) FOA: Program, Utland, FOA 4, FOA 6 1 Issuing organization Document ref. No., ISRN FOA-R—00-01572-180-SE Defence Research Establishment Date of issue Project No. Division of Systems and Underwater July 2000 E60011 Technology SE-172 90 STOCKHOLM Project name (abbrev.
    [Show full text]
  • Radioactive Heaven and Earth
    You have downloaded the electronic version of Radioactive Heaven and Earth The health and environmental effects of nuclear weapons testing in, on, and above the earth A report of the IPPNW International Commission to Investigate the Health and Environmental Effects of Nuclear Weapons Production and the Institute for Energy and Environmental Research The copyright of this book in all formats is held by the International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War and the Institute for Energy and Environmental Research. This electronic file is made available for downloading at no charge for non-commercial use only. Any commercial use, including sales in paper, electronic, audio, or any other format or via the Internet, is strictly prohibited. Unauthorized sales in any format are a violation of copyright law. Hard copies of this book available for sale at http://www.ieer.org/ RADIOACTIVE HEAVEN AND EARTH The Health and Environmental Effects of Nuclear Weapons Testing In, On, and Above the Earth A report of the IPPNW International Commission To Investigate the Health and Environmental Effects of Nuclear Weapons Production and the Institute for Energy and Environmental Research Commission Director Anthony Robbins, M.D. International Physicians for the Prevention . of Nuclear War President of IEER and Technical Consultant to Commission Arjun Makhijani, Ph.D. Institute for Energy and Environmental Research Commission Coordinator Katherine Yih, Ph.D. International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War THE APEX PRESS New Yo* ZED BOOKS London Copyright O 1991 International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War and the Institute for Energy and Environmental Research All rights reserved The Apex Press is an imprint of the Council on Inter- national and Public Affairs, 777 United Nations Plaza, New York, New York 10017 (2121953-6920).
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Explosions 1945 -1998
    F( SE0000380 FOA ISSN 1104-9154 DEFENCE RESEARCH User report ESTABLISHMENT sipri STOCKHOLM INTERNATIONAL PEACE RESEARCH INSTITUTE Nuclear Explosions 1945 -1998 Division of Systems and Underwater Technology SE-172 90 STOCKHOLM PLEASE BE AWARE THAT ALL OF THE MISSING PAGES IN THIS DOCUMENT WERE ORIGINALLY BLANK The picture on the front cover shows numerous cables laid out at an underground nuclear test location at Yucca Flat, Nevada. Yucca Flat was the principle underground nuclear weapons testing area at the Nevada Test Site, United States. The cranes in the picture were used to lower the cable "down-hole" with the nuclear weapon canister. Scientific data was communicated through the cables to recording trailers on the surface. The tower was used to hold the instrumentation canister; the tower was removed before the nuclear device was detonated. The drill emplacement hole is beneath the tower. The picture has been down-loaded (by permission) from the web-site of Nevada Division of Environmental Protection Bureau of Federal Facilities. DEFENCE RESEARCH ESTABLISHMENT FOA-R--00-01572-180-SE Division of Systems and Underwater Technology July 2000 SE-172 90 STOCKHOLM ISSN 1104-9154 Sweden Nuclear Explosions 1945-1998 Nils-Olov Bergkvist Ragnhild Ferm Distribution: UD (2 ex), UD Ambasaden i Wien, Fo (2 ex), FHS, SIPRJ (20 ex) FOA: Program, Utland, FOA 4, FOA 6 Issuing organization Document ret. No., ISRN FOA-R-00-01572-180-SE Defence Research Establishment Date of issue Project No. Division of Systems and Underwater July 2000 E60011 Technology SE-172 90 STOCKHOLM Project name (abbrev. if necessary) Sweden Author(s) initiator of sponsoring organization Nils-Olov Bergkvist Ragnhild Ferm Project manager Nils-Olov Bergkvist Scientifically and technically responsible Nils-Olov Bergkvist and Ragnhild Ferm Document title Nuclear Explosions 1945 -1998 Abstract The main part of this report is a list of nuclear explosions conducted by the United States, the Soviet Union, the United Kingdom, France, China, India and Pakistan in 1945-98.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Weapons Tests and Peaceful Nuclear Explosions By
    NUCLEAR WEAPONS TESTS AND PEACEFUL NUCLEAR EXPLOSIONS BY Natural Resource Defense Council, Inc. 1200 New York Avenue, NW Suite 400 Washington, DC 20005 Tel (main) (202) 289-6868 Norris (direct) (202) 289-2369 Cochran (direct) (202) 289-2372 E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] This Working Paper provides a compendium of all known nuclear tests conducted by the Soviet Union.! With respect to underground tests, the U.S. and Russia define a test as either a single underground nuclear explosion conducted at a test site, or two or more underground nuclear explosions conducted at a test site within an area delineated by a circle having a diameter of two kilometers and conducted within a period of time of 0.1 second.2 Moreover, Russia does not include within the definition of a test, experiments with nuclear energy release of about 1 ton (t) of TNT equivalent or less, except for tests resulting in device failures or those carried out for safety purposes. By this definition the total number of tests in the forty-one year period, from 29 August 1949 through 24 October 1990, is 715. Twenty percent (or 145) of the 715 Soviet tests had multiple explosives (or salvos) resulting in a total of 969 nuclear detonations. By comparison the United States conducted 1,149 detonations in 1,054 tests.3 The sixty three U.S. salvo tests (six percent of the total), involved 158 detonations. One U.S. test used six explosive devices, two used five, four used four, 14 used three, and 42 used two devices.
    [Show full text]
  • The Soviet Program for Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Explosions
    UCRL-ID-124410 The Soviet Program for Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Explosions Milo D. Nordyke -•.'iiCE/VED OCT 2 8 ms OSTJ July 24,1996 This is an informal report intended primarily for internal or limited external distribution. The opinions and conclusions stated are those of the author and may or may not be those of the Laboratory. Work performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under Contract W-7405-ENG-48. DISTRIBUTION OF THIS DOCUMENT IS UNLIMITED DISCLAIMER This document was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government Neither the United States Government nor the University of California nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or the University of California. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or the University of California, and shall not be used for advertising or product endorsement purposes. This report has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is Basic Physics Worth? François Roby
    What is basic physics worth? François Roby To cite this version: François Roby. What is basic physics worth?: Orders of magnitude, energy, and overconfidence in technical refinements. 2019. hal-02004696v3 HAL Id: hal-02004696 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02004696v3 Preprint submitted on 18 Feb 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - NoDerivatives| 4.0 International License What is basic physics worth? Orders of magnitude, energy, and overconfidence in technical refinements François Roby∗ « Être informé de tout et condamné ainsi à ne rien comprendre, tel est le sort des imbéciles. » Georges Bernanos (18881948), in La France contre les robots “It doesn’t make any difference how beautiful your guess is, it doesn’t make any difference how smart you are, who made the guess, or what his name is. If it disagrees with experiment, it’s wrong. That’s all there is to it.” Richard Phillips Feynman (19181988), in a famous 1964 lecture at Cornell University. Physics is often perceived as a science of ment occurs thanks to conduction, convec complex and precise calculations, making tion and radiation.
    [Show full text]