Elaborative Encoding As an Explanation of Levels of Processing

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Elaborative Encoding As an Explanation of Levels of Processing JOURNAL OF VERBAL LEARNING AND VERBAL BEHAVIOR 21, 165-- 174 (1982) Elaborative Encoding as an Explanation of Levels of Processing GARY L. BRADSHAW AND JOHN R. ANDERSON Carnegie-Mellon University Three experiments were performed to study how elaboration of memory structures affects recall accuracy and response latency. The experiments introduce a methodology which can independently manipulate the amount and type of elaborations given to subjects. Using this methodology, it was shown that integrated, highly elaborated memory traces were better recalled than either small unelaborated traces or large, poorly integrated traces. The results have implications for current analyses of levels of processing phenomena, and were found to support the encoding elaboration model (J. R. Anderson & L. M. Reder, Levels of process- ing in human memory. HiUsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum, 1979). In their original conceptualization, Craik criminability of the memory trace (Lock- and Lockhart (1972) argued that memory hart, Craik, & Jacoby, 1976). traces were a record of the processing done Craik and Tulving (1975) performed a on a stimulus. Qualitatively different traces series of experiments which they inter- were said to result from processing a preted as showing both effects of depth of stimulus in different ways. Researchers processing and degree of elaboration. Rep- characterized processing tasks in terms of licating earlier research, they found better the level, or depth, of processing, Early performance for semantically processed studies (Hyde & Jenkins, 1973; Schulman, material than for shallow, physically pro- 1970) reported meaningful, semantic pro- cessed material. This result was obtained cessing of materials led to superior perfor- even when the shallow task took longer to mance on a subsequent recall or recognition perform than the semantic task. Craik and task than performance after shallow, non- Tulving felt that differences in elaboration semantic processing. This superiority was could not account for these results. Such a explained in terms of greater durability of conclusion was natural from a levels of pro- semantic traces (Kintsch, 1975), or less in- cessing framework, which regards memory terference between semantic traces (Wick- as simply a record of perception. Since the elgren, 1973) over other types of traces. shallow analysis took longer to perform, However, this simple analysis was inade- they argued that the memory trace must quate to account for differences in recall for have been more elaborate than the semantic material processed at the same, deep level analysis. They concluded that the memory (Bobrow & Bower, 1969). Later accounts traces were qualitatively different between expanded upon the original formulation by these tasks, due to processing items at dif- proposing that processing within a level ferent levels. could differ in terms of its degree of elab- Craik and Tulving observed differences oration (Craik & Tulving, 1975), or the dis- in recall for semantically processed items, contingent upon a yes or no response in the orienting task. They also found better per- This research was supported by Grant BNS78-17463 formance when subjects had to judge words from the National Science Foundation. Requests for in the context of more elaborate sentence reprints should be sent to John R. Anderson, Depart- frames. These results they thought re- ment of Psychology, Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pa. 15213. We would like to thank Lynne flected the effect of degree of elaboration at Reder for her comments on an earlier draft of this a particular level. Craik and Tulving con- manuscript. cluded that two mechanisms were at work 165 0022-5371/82/020165-10502.00/0 Copyright O 1982 by AcademicPress, Inc. All rights of reproduction in any form reserved. 166 BRADSHAW AND ANDERSON to produce the results observed. Processing elaboration models (Anderson & Reder, tasks with different levels affected the 1979). qualitative nature of the memory trace, The first class of models (Bransford et while differences which occurred at the al., 1979; Tulving, 1979) account for re- same level of processing were due to differ- duced performance for shallow processing ences in elaboration of the memory trace. by noting the information extracted in the Recently, a major series of criticisms semantic processing test is more consistent have been leveled at the original levels of with the retrieval requirements of the sur- processing formulation. Craik and Lock- prise recall task than information extracted hart (1972) claimed that subjects only en- in the other tests. Bransford et al. refer to code attributes of a stimulus item required this theory as transfer-appropriate pro- by the orienting task. A question about the cessing while Tulving sees this as an exten- sound of a word was said to lead to a trace sion of his encoding specificity principle. which encoded that attribute, but not in- To be somewhat neutral we will refer to this formation about the orthographic features type of account of depth of processing as or meaning of that word. Numerous ex- encoding-appropriateness. Our major crit- periments have been done (e.g., Bransford, icism of this approach is that it is simply a Franks, Morris, & Stein, 1979; Eysenck, summary of empirical data, rather than a 1979; Nelson, 1979) that indicate a memory model of the processes involved. As such, trace records multiple levels of information. it is unable to predict the effects of many For instance, Nelson, Reed, and McEvoy study manipulations including the ones to (1977) showed that phonetic or semantic be reported here. interference will lower recall independent The distinctiveness models (Bransford et of the original orienting task. Nelson (1979) al., 1979; Jacoby & Craik, 1979; Nelson, argued that orienting tasks have their effect 1979; Eysenck, 1979; Wickelgren, 1973) by emphasizing the attributes that are in- rest on the assertion that semantically pro- volved by them. Subjects automatically cessed traces are more distinct from one process items at many levels, but may di- another than are traces processed with re- rect further controlled processing to elabo- spect to surface properties like phonetic rate upon a particular attribute. structure. Calling on past research from the Most current models of levels of process- interference literature, these models predict ing phenomena (Jacoby & Craik, 1979; Nel- that more distinctive traces will be better son, 1979; Eysenck, 1979) accept the gen- recalled. Anderson and Reder (1979) argued eral formulation which has been developed that there are many situations where recall here: Subjects will automatically encode for highly distinctive events can be further most attributes of stimulus materials re- facilitated by elaborative processing. For gardless of the orienting task. Manipula- instance, Bower, Kadin, and Dueck (1975) tions in the orienting tasks are effective be- demonstrated better memory for distinctive cause they direct further controlled pro- drawings when the drawings were given cessing to different levels. Differences in meaningful interpretations. The experi- current models do not center around the ments to be reported here will contain a di- initial encoding of information, but rather rect contrast between the predictions of how the encoded information leads to dif- distinctiveness and elaboration. ferences in retrieval. There are three gen- Anderson and Reder (1979) proposed an eral types of explanations: models that em- elaboration model which could explain phasize the match between study and test depth-of-processing effects. According to (Bransford et al., 1979; Tulving, 1979), dis- this theory the to-be-remembered material tinctiveness models (Jacoby & Craik, 1979; and any elaborations are encoded into a Lockhart et al., 1976; Eysenck, 1979), and propositional network. Any particular en- ENCODING ELABORATION 167 coded proposition is fragile. There is a sig- in recall for the main fact like Newton be- nificant chance that the subject will not be came emotionally unstable and insecure as able to activate that proposition at test. a child. In the caused-by and resulted-in However, if the subject generated a mem- conditions subjects were provided with two ory episode which encoded a set of multiple other highly related facts. We assume that propositions that were partially redundant these facts are like the kinds of elaborations with the to-be-remembered information, he subjects would generate themselves. The or she would have a much better chance of unrelated condition also included two addi- recalling it at the time of test. There are two tional facts, but these facts had little con- basic ways that a more elaborate encoding nection to the target central fact. Finally, in can lead to better memory. One, which we the single condition, subjects studied just call network redundancy, involves using the main fact. alternate retrieval paths created by the The elaboration model predicts best re- elaborations. The second possibility, which call in the related condition. This is because is more appropriate to sentential material this condition creates the kind of network than single word material, is what we call and inferential redundancy that is postu- inferential redundancy. This refers to the lated to promote good recall. Memory per- fact that the subject may be able to infer the formance should be worst in the unrelated material he studied from remaining elab- conditions, according to the ACT theory, orations. because these facts only
Recommended publications
  • The Effects of Multimedia and Elaborative Encoding on Learning
    The Effects of Multimedia and Elaborative Encoding on Learning Lawrence J. Najjar School of Psychology and Graphics, Visualization, and Usability Laboratory Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta, GA 30332-0170 [email protected] February 7, 1996 (Technical Report GIT-GVU-96-05) Keywords: Multimedia, elaborative encoding, learning Electronic versions of this paper are available via: FTP ftp://ftp.gvu.gatech.edu:/pub/gvu/tech-reports/96-05.ps.Z Gopher gopher://gopher.cc.gatech.edu/pub/gvu/tech-reports World Wide Web http://www.cc.gatech.edu/gvu/reports/TechReports96.html Table of Contents Abstract .............................................................................................3 Chapter 1 Introduction ..........................................................................4 Chapter 2 Effects of Multimedia on Learning ................................................6 Multimedia Helps People to Learn .....................................................6 Text and Illustrations............................................................ 6 Text and Animated Graphics ...................................................6 Audio and Audio-Visual ........................................................7 Text, Audio, and Illustrations.................................................. 8 Multimedia Does Not Help People to Learn...........................................8 Text and Illustrations............................................................ 9 Text and Animated Graphics ...................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Elaborative Encoding, the Ancient Art of Memory, and the Hippocampus
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES (2013) 36, 589–659 provided by RERO DOC Digital Library doi:10.1017/S0140525X12003135 Such stuff as dreams are made on? Elaborative encoding, the ancient art of memory, and the hippocampus Sue Llewellyn Faculty of Humanities, University of Manchester, Manchester M15 6PB, United Kingdom http://www.humanities.manchester.ac.uk [email protected] Abstract: This article argues that rapid eye movement (REM) dreaming is elaborative encoding for episodic memories. Elaborative encoding in REM can, at least partially, be understood through ancient art of memory (AAOM) principles: visualization, bizarre association, organization, narration, embodiment, and location. These principles render recent memories more distinctive through novel and meaningful association with emotionally salient, remote memories. The AAOM optimizes memory performance, suggesting that its principles may predict aspects of how episodic memory is configured in the brain. Integration and segregation are fundamental organizing principles in the cerebral cortex. Episodic memory networks interconnect profusely within the cortex, creating omnidirectional “landmark” junctions. Memories may be integrated at junctions but segregated along connecting network paths that meet at junctions. Episodic junctions may be instantiated during non–rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep after hippocampal associational function during REM dreams. Hippocampal association involves relating, binding, and integrating episodic memories into a mnemonic compositional whole. This often bizarre, composite image has not been present to the senses; it is not “real” because it hyperassociates several memories. During REM sleep, on the phenomenological level, this composite image is experienced as a dream scene.
    [Show full text]
  • Cognitive and Neuropsychological Aspects of Age-Associated Memory Dysfunction
    COGNITIVE AND NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF AGE-ASSOCIATED MEMORY DYSFUNCTION A k a d e m is k a v h a n d l in g som för avläggande av filosofie doktorsexamen med vederbörligt tillstånd av rektorsämbetet vid Umeå universitet framlägges för offentlig granskning vid Psykologiska institutionen, Umeå Universitet, Seminarierum 2, fredagen den 24 januari 1992, klockan 10.15 AV Th o m a s K a r l s s o n Psykologiska institutionen, Umeå Universitet, Umeå COGNITIVE AND NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF AGE- ASSOCIATED MEMORY DYSFUNCTION BY Thom as K arlsson Doctoral Dissertation Department of Psychology, University of Umeå, Umeå, Sweden ABSTRACT Memory dysfunction is common in association with the course of normal aging. Memory dysfunction is also obligatory in age-associated neurological disorders, such as Alzheimer’s disease. However, despite the ubiquitousness of age-related memory decline, several basic questions regarding this entity remain unanswered. The present investigation addressed two such questions: (1) Can individuals suffering from memory dysfunction due to aging and amnesia due to Alzheimer’s disease improve memory performance if contextual support is provided at the time of acquisition of to-be- remembered material or reproduction of to-be-remembered material? (2) Are memory deficits observed in ‘younger’ older adults similar to the deficits observed in ‘older’ elderly subjects, Alzheimer’s disease, and memory dysfunction in younger subjects? The outcome of this investigation suggests an affirmative answer to the first question. Given appropriate support at encoding and retrieval, even densely amnesic patients can improve their memory performance. As to the second question, a more complex pattern emerges.
    [Show full text]
  • Encoding and Retrieval from Long-Term Memory
    SMITMC05_0131825089.QXD 3/29/06 12:49 AM Page 192 REVISED PAGES CHAPTER 5 Encoding and Retrieval from Long-Term Memory Learning Objectives 1. The Nature of Long-Term Memory 3.3. Cues for Retrieval 1.1. The Forms of Long-Term Memory 3.4. The Second Time Around: Recognizing 1.2. The Power of Memory: The Story of H.M. Stimuli by Recollection and Familiarity 1.3. Multiple Systems for Long-Term DEBATE: “Remembering,” “Knowing,” and Learning and Remembering the Medial Temporal Lobes 2. Encoding: How Episodic Memories are 3.5. Misremembering the Past Formed 3.5.1. Bias 2.1. The Importance of Attention 3.5.2. Misattribution A CLOSER LOOK: Transfer Appropriate 3.5.3. Suggestion Processing 4. The Encoding Was Successful, But I Still 2.2. Levels of Processing and Elaborative Can’t Remember Encoding 4.1. Ebbinghaus’s Forgetting Function 2.2.1. Levels-of-Processing Theory: 4.2. Forgetting and Competition Argument and Limitations 4.2.1. Retroactive and Proactive 2.2.2. The Brain, Semantic Elabora- Interference tion, and Episodic Encoding 4.2.2. Blocking and Suppression 2.3. Enhancers of Encoding: Generation and 5. Nondeclarative Memory Systems Spacing 5.1. Priming 2.3.1. The Generation Effect 5.1.1. Perceptual Priming 2.3.2. The Spacing Effect 5.1.2. Conceptual Priming 2.4. Episodic Encoding, Binding, and the 5.2. Beyond Priming: Other Forms of Non- Medial Temporal Lobe declarative Memory 2.5. Consolidation: The Fixing of Memory 5.2.1. Skill Learning 3. Retrieval: How We Recall the Past from 5.2.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Mechanics of Memory – a Review
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR INNOVATIVE RESEARCH IN MULTIDISCIPLINARY FIELD ISSN – 2455-0620 Volume - 2, Issue - 9, Sept - 2016 MECHANICS OF MEMORY – A REVIEW Pampori, Z. A. and Malla, W. A Division of Veterinary Physiology, SKUAST-Kashmir, Alusteng, Srinagar, Kashmir, J&K State, India. Email - [email protected] Abstract: The interaction of living organisms between themselves and with the environment is essential for survival. The communication among different living species involves the integrity of central nervous system which generates brain activity such as arousal, attention, learning and memory. Moreover, face perception and recognition of faces are fundamental brain processes for human relationship. The ability to hold objects in memory is essential to intelligent behavior, but its neural basis still remains poorly understood. Advances in neuroscience research for past two decades have contributed to clarify the intricate puzzle about brain recognizing objects. Key words: Biology of memory, Construction of memory, Neurophysiology of memory, Types of memory. INTRODUCTION: Memory provides an organism the competence to learn and adapt from previous experiences as well as build relationships. Memories make you feel comfortable with familiar people and surroundings, tie your past with your present, and provide a framework for the future. Most people talk about memory as if it is a thing or part of a body, like bad eyes or a good head of hair. But it does not exist as a "thing" that you can touch. It is a concept that refers to the process of remembering. The most difficult problem in discussing memory and one of the mysteries of the brain is neural basis of memory.
    [Show full text]
  • Influence of Controlled Encoding and Retrieval Facilitation on Memory
    Journal of Neurology (2019) 266:2447–2456 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-019-09411-z ORIGINAL COMMUNICATION Infuence of controlled encoding and retrieval facilitation on memory performance of patients with subcortical ischemic vascular dementia and Alzheimer’s disease Roberta Perri1 · Marco Monaco1 · Lucia Fadda1,2 · Carlo Caltagirone1,2 · Giovanni A. Carlesimo1,2 Received: 23 January 2019 / Revised: 9 May 2019 / Accepted: 30 May 2019 / Published online: 18 June 2019 © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019 Abstract Patients with subcortical ischemic vascular dementia (SIVD) perform better than Alzheimer’s disease patients (AD) on the Free and Cued Recall Selective Reminding test (FCSRT). In this test, SIVD are able to overcome their strategic retrieval defcit, whereas AD patients, whose memory impairment is due to a hippocampal storage defcit, are not. However, the FCSRT does not assess the advantage passing from free to assisted learning, which is expected to be diferent in frontal and hippocampal damage. We compared SIVD, AD and healthy subjects on the free recall of a 15-word list not assisted at encoding and on the free and cued recall of the FCRST. Indexes of Encoding, Cueing and Total (measuring the advantage passing from the 15-word list free recall to the free and cued recall of the FCRST) were computed. The two groups performed comparably poorly on the free recall of the 15-word list, but SIVD outperformed AD patients in the free and cued recall of the FCSRT and took greater advantage than AD patients on both learning and recall when passing from the unassisted to the assisted paradigms.
    [Show full text]
  • Applying Encoding and Retrieval Techniques to Chinese Rhyme
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Department of Teaching, Learning and Teacher The eN braska Educator: A Student-Led Journal Education 2017 Applying Encoding and Retrieval Techniques to Chinese Rhyme Reading in Advanced Placement Chinese Instruction Nan Wang University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nebeducator Part of the Bilingual, Multilingual, and Multicultural Education Commons, Curriculum and Instruction Commons, Educational Methods Commons, Educational Psychology Commons, Language and Literacy Education Commons, and the Secondary Education and Teaching Commons Wang, Nan, "Applying Encoding and Retrieval Techniques to Chinese Rhyme Reading in Advanced Placement Chinese Instruction" (2017). The Nebraska Educator: A Student-Led Journal. 41. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nebeducator/41 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Teaching, Learning and Teacher Education at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in The eN braska Educator: A Student-Led Journal by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. THE NEBRASKA EDUCATO R, VOLUME 4: 2017 64 Applying Encoding and Retrieval Techniques to Chinese Rhyme Reading in Advanced Placement Chinese Instruction Nan Wang Department of Educational Administration Abstract Learning Chinese as a foreign language is increasingly prevalent in public school districts in the U.S. As ACTFL (2011) reported, an increasing number of enrollments of Advanced Placement Chinese courses indicate a growing demand for Chinese language courses in U.S. public school districts (ACTFL, 2011; ACTFL, 2017). AP foreign language exams indicate that students from the mainstream culture in the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Relationships Between User Performance and Spatial Ability in Using Map-Based Software on Pen- Based Devices Michelle Lenae Rusch Iowa State University
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Graduate Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 2008 Relationships between user performance and spatial ability in using map-based software on pen- based devices Michelle Lenae Rusch Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd Part of the Computer Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Rusch, Michelle Lenae, "Relationships between user performance and spatial ability in using map-based software on pen-based devices" (2008). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 10927. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd/10927 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Relationships between user performance and spatial ability in using map-based software on pen-based devices by Michelle Lenae Rusch A dissertation submitted to the graduate faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Major: Human Computer Interaction Program of Study Committee: Leslie Miller, Co-major Professor Sarah Nusser, Co-major Professor James Bernard Reginald Souleyrette Judy Vance Iowa State University Ames, Iowa 2008 Copyright © Michelle Lenae Rusch, 2008. All rights reserved. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES iv LIST OF TABLES
    [Show full text]
  • Operations in Forming an Impression of Another Person
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY 18, 217-234 (1982) The Informational Basis of Social Judgments: Operations in Forming an Impression of Another Person EUGENE BURNSTEIN AND YAACOV SCHUL The University of Michigan Received October 7. 1980 This paper describes four functionally distinct operations carried out in forming an impression of another person: Initial encoding, elaborative encoding, inte- gration, and decision. These processes were identified empirically on the basis of their differential sensitivity to the amount and the consistency of information in a trait description. In Study 1 as the trait set increased in size, processing was hindered to the greatest extent during initial encoding, to a moderate extent during elaborative encoding, and least during the integration-decision interval. Varying consistency produced the opposite pattern of results, that is, an incon- sistent trait description hindered processing the least during initial encoding, a moderate amount during elaborative encoding, and the most during the integra- tion-decision interval. In Study 2 the quantity of information was manipulated via implicit knowledge, that is, the associative structure activated by the trait (rather than set size). Because implicit information is “preintegrated,” impli- cation-rich traits did not hinder initial or elaborative encoding more than impli- cation-poor traits. The decision operation, however, was performed more rapidly with implication-rich traits than with implication-poor ones, which strongly sug- gests that once information is integrated, the “richer” the representation, the easier it is to arrive at a decision. Traditionally, research on social judgments in general, and impression formation in particular, has been concerned with the functional rela- tionship between properties of the judgment (e.g., the extremity of the impression) and properties of the stimulus information (e.g., the number of traits, their consistency).
    [Show full text]
  • Testing Computer-Aided Mnemonics and Feedback for Fast Memorization of High-Value Secrets
    Testing Computer-Aided Mnemonics and Feedback for Fast Memorization of High-Value Secrets Sauvik Das and Jason Hong Stuart Schechter Carnegie Mellon University Microsoft Research [email protected] and [email protected] [email protected] Abstract—People sometimes require very strong passwords her master password to be very strong. Additionally, consider for high-value accounts (e.g., master passwords for password whistle-blowers and reporters who want to protect the private managers and encryption keys), but often cannot create these components of their asymmetric keys by encrypting them with strong passwords. Assigning them provably strong secrets is one strong memorized secrets. For these users, there may be no solution, and prior work has shown that people can learn these alternative secure channel that they can trust for two-factor assigned secrets through rote learning, though learning the secrets authentication. In all of these cases, users may benefit from takes some time and they are quickly forgotten after two weeks of disuse. To improve upon the learning speed and long-term learning one or more high-security secrets. All the better if recall of strong, assigned secrets, we introduce, implement and they can do so reliably and with a reasonable amount of effort. evaluate a set of treatments, inspired by mnemonic devices and real-time feedback tutoring systems, to assist people in learning Despite conventional wisdom to the contrary, Bonneau and and remembering their assigned secrets. We encoded strong Sc3hechter recently demonstrated that lay people can indeed secrets as a set of six words randomly chosen from a corpus reliably learn strong (56-bit) passwords with a reasonable of 676 (∼56 bits of entropy).
    [Show full text]
  • Concreteness and Encoding Instructions in Paired-Associate Transfer
    Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 1977, Vol. 9 (1).1-4 Concreteness and encoding instructions in paired-associate transfer JOHN H. MUELLER and JAMES P. PICKERING University ofMisswri. Columbia, Misswri 65201 Subjects were instructed to use either different mnemonics (compound images or verbal combinations) on List 1 and List 2 in an A-B. A-Br transfer paradigm. or to use the same type of mnemonic strategy for both tasks. Compared to A-B. CoB control subjects who were similarly instructed. there was no evidence that switching the type of elaborative encoding led to reduced interference. Negative transfer is typically observed when subjects through either an imaginal or a verbal-symbolic proces­ are required to learn new responses to old nominal sing system, or both, while abstract (low-imagery) items stimuli, as in the A-B, A-Br transfer paradigm. Such are processed through the verbal-symbolic system alone. transfer is usually attributed to interference from List 1 This "dual-code" analysis can be readily related to the associations. It has been argued, however, that subjects recoding corollary. For example, an image could be might select new functional stimuli during Ust 2, thus utilized in the first task and then the same nominal avoiding interference (Bryk & Kausler, 1966). Martin stimulus could be encoded verbally in the second task, (1968) has developed an encoding variability hypothesis or a different image might be used in the second task, which argues that recoding will be easier when the with interference potentially reduced in either manner. stimulus has multiple encodings. Abstract items presumably would not have su~ Two things are involved in this hypothesis: (1) the flexibility .
    [Show full text]
  • Elaborative Encoding
    Journal of Memory and Language 67 (2012) 17–29 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Journal of Memory and Language journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jml Separate mnemonic effects of retrieval practice and elaborative encoding Jeffrey D. Karpicke ⇑, Megan A. Smith Department of Psychological Sciences, Purdue University, 703 Third Street, West Lafayette, IN 47907-2081, United States article info abstract Article history: Does retrieval practice produce learning because it is an especially effective way to induce Received 24 August 2011 elaborative encoding? Four experiments examined this question. Subjects learned word revision received 7 February 2012 pairs across alternating study and recall periods, and once an item was recalled it was Available online 11 March 2012 dropped from further practice, repeatedly studied, or repeatedly retrieved on repeated recall trials. In elaborative study conditions, subjects used an imagery-based keyword Keywords: method (Experiments 1–2) or a verbal elaboration method (Experiment 3) to encode items Retrieval practice during repeated study trials. On a criterial test 1 week after the initial learning phase, Testing effect repeated retrieval produced better long-term retention than repeated study even under Learning Elaboration elaborative study conditions. Elaborative studying improved initial encoding when it occurred prior to the first correct recall of an item, but while repeated retrieval enhanced long-term retention, elaboration produced no measurable learning when it occurred after successful retrieval. Experiment 4 used identical item word pairs (e.g., castle–castle) to reduce or eliminate verbal elaboration, and robust effects of repeated retrieval were still observed with these materials. Retrieval practice likely produces learning by virtue of mechanisms other than elaboration.
    [Show full text]