18 0846 Lvia

Yew Tree and Gardens

Client: Mr M. Harrison

– Newfield Edge Hall, Gisburn, Lancashire

Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment

Prepared by Yew Tree+Gardens Yew Tree House Hale, Milnthorpe Cumbria LA7 7BJ 015395 63527 07813 897631 [email protected]

23/07/18

CONTENTS

1. Introduction ...... 3

2. Relevant Landscape Policies ...... 4

3. Site, Setting and Landscape Context ...... 5

4. Development Proposals...... 8

5. Viewpoints ...... 9

6. Character assessment ...... 11

7. Conclusion ...... 12

8. Methodology ...... 13

Appendix 1 - Location Map

Appendix 2 - Images

Appendix 3 - Visual Impacts Table

Appendix 4 - Landscape Baseline Effects Table

Appendix 5 – Landscape Character Map

Appendix 6 –Proposed Site Layout

Appendix 7 –Proposed Elevations

Ref: Newfield Edge Hall: LVIA 23_07_18 Page 1

23/07/18

Ref: Newfield Edge Hall: LVIA 23_07_18 Page 2

23/07/18

1. Introduction a. This document is intended to provide a landscape and visual impact assessment in relation to the proposed residential development at the site which is currently occupied by a detached barn, indoor swimming pool and tennis court. The location of the application site is illustrated in Appendix 1 and Appendix 5. Image location map and Landscape Character. The current site is comprised of a the above named buildings which are set within the landscaped grounds of Newfield Edge Hall.

The existing site has extensive boundary screening vegetation which is associated with the swimming pool and tennis court. This screening is established and is of a density and height which serves to largely obscure visibility of the existing structures from locations outside of the site boundaries.

b. An appraisal of the surrounding area has been completed using Ordnance Survey data, local policy and published landscape character assessments. This information has been used alongside the on-site analysis to identify key viewpoints, analyse the landscape character and visual environment of the local area and assess the likely extent of any notable potential landscape and visual impact effects. c. The purpose of this assessment is to evaluate the viability of the proposed development in both landscape character and visual amenity terms. This assessment has been drafted from guidance contained in GLVIA3 (Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment 3rd Edition) published by the Landscape Institute and the Institute of Environmental Management and Assessment in April 2013 - electronic version and utilizing the standardized descriptors detailed in SNH Handbook on Environmental Impact Assessment 2009.

Ref: Newfield Edge Hall: LVIA 23_07_18 Page 3

23/07/18

2. Relevant Landscape Policies

Local Planning Policy

All relevant policy extracts and references are contained within the documentation created by JWPC Ltd, we have not undertaken any review of policies in relation to this LVIA.

Previous planning history

The site has not been subject to previous planning applications for residential dwellings.

The two most recent applications which are shown on the Ribble Valley planning search are the construction of the conservatory and an extension to the swimming pool in 1995 and 1992 respectively.

Ref: Newfield Edge Hall: LVIA 23_07_18 Page 4

23/07/18

3. Site, Setting and Landscape Context a. The development site is centered on the location of two existing buildings. These are the barn and the swimming pool with an area of proposed landscaping being located within the section of the site currently occupied by the tennis court. b. The barn is located to the North of Newfield Edge Hall and is of mixed construction with a traditional / vernacular element running from North to South and an ‘arm’ of more recent concrete panel clad construction running from East to West. This ‘arm’ contains modern garage doors facing into the site, a number of modern, glazed roof lights are located within the roofs and a conservatory is attached to the Eastern elevation of the barn The detached, single storey swimming pool building is located in a lower area of the site to the West of the barn. Both the barn and swimming pool / tennis court are surrounded by established vegetation. This has the effect of entirely screening the swimming pool / tennis court and also of screening the barn entirely from the South and West with additional vegetation, buildings and topography screening the barn from the east and the majority of the Northern boundaries. c. The site occupies an elevated position below Weets Hill with land to the North, South and West falling away to the lower areas of the Ribble Valley. The site is not visible from elevated land to the East due to the topography of the intervening landscape. d. The site is accessed from the A682 public highway to the East. This entrance and associated driveway are visible from the highway, however due to the volume and density of existing tree stock and vegetation within the site neither the development area nor other existing dwellings are readily visible. e. The presence of significant volumes of mixed species is a visible presence within the landscape. As well as having a screening effect on all of the existing dwellings / structures and landscaped areas it does provide a strong indication of the residential nature of the site. f. A single public footpath runs parallel to the Eastern site boundary g. The site is located 1.5 km to the North of the boundary of the Forest of Bowland AONB.

Ref: Newfield Edge Hall: LVIA 23_07_18 Page 5

23/07/18

Topography a. The site itself is located at the Eastern extent of an area of rolling farmland, this farmland consists of enclosed fields of mainly improved grassland. b. Fields to the South, North and West of the site are divided by a network of drystone walls and traditional hedgerow boundaries; occasional groups of trees become less frequent within the more elevated landscape surrounding the site. c. Land to the East of the site gradually increases in elevation until a distance of approximately 600 m from the site where the slopes of Weet Hill are encountered. Land to the East of this point continues to rise to the open moorland fells. d. Land to the North of the site continues at a similar elevation then gradually reduces in elevation towards the undulating farmland to the South of Barnoldswick e. Land to the Southwest of the site descends towards The Ribble Valley with lower areas of undulating farmland and parcels of woodland encountered towards Howgill and Rimington. This landscape represents the lower margins of the elevated land before the valley formed by Swanside Beck is reached. f. Land to the East of the site forms an upland moorland ridge, this ridge terminates above Barnoldswick to the North but continues to the South as the mass of Pendle Hill is approached. This ridge has a lower height at the point at which the A682 highway crosses its crest with this area being differentiated from land to the North and South by a continuation of enclosed agricultural grazing. g. Land of significant elevation is not encountered to the West or South of the site until the central fells of The Forest of Bowland in the direction of Slaidburn. This elevated land is located at a significant distance from the site.

Ref: Newfield Edge Hall: LVIA 23_07_18 Page 6

23/07/18

Cultural Pattern

The setting of the site is characterized as being within an area of low population density / developments.

The location of the site to the East of the land identified as Lowland Undulating Farmland and within an area identified as being Moorland Fringe influences its cultural context. The landscape to the West of the site is comprised of a network of minor lanes within fields associated with dairy farming and agricultural use. This landscape contains farms at intervals with these farms typically being composed of a mixture of traditional vernacular buildings and later 20th century agricultural buildings.

Scattered dwellings and clusters of dwellings are located at points along these lanes with occasional agricultural dwellings / farms sited away from public highways and accessed via farm tracks across the grazing land. These dwellings are often associated with groups of mature trees (predominantly Sycamore).

The frequency of dwellings and agricultural holdings reduces as the more elevated land surrounding the site and to the East of the site is reached.

The closest dwellings / structures are clustered around Higher Newfield Edge to the North of the site. These are comprised of dwellings and a mixture of traditional and modern agricultural / equestrian buildings.

A single dwelling ‘Newfield Edge’ is located to the East of the site entrance immediately adjacent to the highway, this dwelling is a modernized agricultural dwelling with converted barns. A second dwelling ‘Crag’ located further to the East beneath Weets Hill is a traditional upland farm holding with farmhouse and attached barn of a vernacular style.

No other habitation is located to the East of the site as this landscape is comprised of open moorland fells.

Newfield Edge Hall as previously stated, is enclosed by extensive areas of established trees and shrubs. The effect of this planting is to give shelter to the existing dwellings and grounds and also to obscure the existing structures from external views. The site contains, the detached barn, swimming pool and tennis court included within this development; it also contains the historic dwelling Newfield Edge Hall and a detached 20th dwelling towards the South East corner of the central site.

As outlined previously, the tarmac driveway, post and rail fencing and extensive mixed species landscaping strongly hint at the presence of a dwelling but due to the density of the screening the actual dwellings and structures are not readily visible within the surrounding landscape.

Ref: Newfield Edge Hall: LVIA 23_07_18 Page 7

23/07/18

4. Development Proposals

The development proposal is for the conversion and alteration of the existing barn into a residential dwelling. The supplied proposals are illustrated in Appendix 6.

A second element of the development proposal is for the removal of the existing swimming pool building followed by the construction of a similar footprint and height. The current tennis court would form and area of gardens and car parking for this dwelling.

The barn conversion would be accessed via the existing driveway and utilize the extensive areas of hard surfaces for vehicle parking and maneuvering. Access to the dwelling within the former tennis court would be via a driveway spur from the existing access.

Ref: Newfield Edge Hall: LVIA 23_07_18 Page 8

23/07/18

5. Viewpoints / Visual Impacts

Localised receptor points

As detailed in Appendix 1, 2 and 3 we have identified a number of localised receptor points within a radius of up to 2.0 km from the site.

These receptor points are predominantly located to the West and North of the site and can be defined as either being along Stocks Lane or within the environs of Coal Pit Lane / High Netherfield Edge.

Due to the location of the site and the surrounding topography, the site is not visible from receptors to the East towards Weets Hill.

A limited number of transient receptors are located immediately to the South of the site along the A682 highway.

For detailed assessment of individual receptor points see Appendix 3: Visual Effects Table and Appendix 1 Locations map which details image locations.

As can be seen from the assessed impacts over the period 1 to 15 years we are of the opinion that the overall impact of the proposed development will lend towards a scale of negligible adverse to none.

This assessment is based upon a number of factors.

Firstly, the receptor points to the South and West do not have views of either the barn or swimming pool due to the density of existing boundary / screening vegetation.

Secondly, the site cannot be viewed from open land and footpaths to the East.

Thirdly, where views of the existing barn are achieved from the North of the site these are glimpsed and significantly obscured by existing vegetation. The proposed alterations to the barn are likely to be glimpsed from a restricted number of locations.

With the exception of any glimpsed views of the proposed first floor openings in the barn, no views are obtained of the swimming pool from outside the site.

Finally, the location of the proposed vehicle access combined with existing and additional landscape planting will not be visually significant for any localised receptors.

Ref: Newfield Edge Hall: LVIA 23_07_18 Page 9

23/07/18

Distant receptor points

As can be seen from Appendix 1, 2 and 3, distant receptor points are restricted to locations in excess of 2 km from the site.

The landscape topography prevents views of the site from the East and distance views to the South are limited by the continuation of elevated land.

This restricts potential distant receptor locations to the lower valley landscape to the South of Gisburn village and distant landscape towards Barnoldswick.

The presence of the existing screening, surrounding landforms / topography and distance from site means that the impacts on all distant receptors will be none.

Ref: Newfield Edge Hall: LVIA 23_07_18 Page 10

23/07/18

6. Character assessment a. The character assessment identifies that the setting of the site is within the National Landscape Character Area (NCA) 33 Bowland Fringe and Pendle Hill with the NCA 35 Lancashire Valleys being located to the East of the site where this landscape commences after the upper levels of Weets Hill. b. Whilst the site is located towards the edge of the NCA 33 character area, this is such a wide ranging character classification that the surrounding landscape of moorland / upland fringe is typical of the areas which form transitional zones between the more intensively managed lowland farmland and the unenclosed moorland areas. c. The site is identified within the Lancashire County Council Character Types as being within the 4i North Pendle Moorland fringe. This is a relatively narrow ‘strip’ of landscape which forms a transition from the enclosed grazing land to the higher areas of moorland to the East. d. This zone, as detailed in the Cultural Pattern is relatively sparsely populated and where dwellings are present they are of generally traditional / vernacular appearance with occasional modern agricultural buildings where farming activity is present. The moorland fringe is sensitive to change. e. When assessing the impact of the proposed development upon the Landscape Character of the surrounding area we have assessed both the current site impact and the likely impact of the proposed development. f. We are of the opinion that the current site does not impact upon the character of the surrounding landscape. As stated, the volume and type of existing tree stock is not typical of that surrounding other dwellings / agricultural holdings in the locale. However, this is outweighed by the fact that the existing dwellings and buildings are not visible within the surrounding landscape. g. The proposed development will not represent any significant change to the existing site and therefore we are of the opinion that it will not have an impact upon the surrounding landscape character.

Ref: Newfield Edge Hall: LVIA 23_07_18 Page 11

23/07/18

7. Conclusion

The development site is located on a site which is visible from a number of mainly transient receptors, it is located within an area of elevated moorland fringe.

The current site has two existing dwellings, a barn, swimming pool building and tennis court. None of these structures are visually significant within either the surroundings of the site or the wider landscape.

The existing dwelling, Newfield Edge Hall and the detached barn are glimpsed from a limited number of locations. These glimpsed views are of the chimneys and portions of the ridge of the hall and sections of the Northern elevation and roofline of the barn. The swimming pool building and tennis court are entirely screened from external views.

The proposed development is based upon these existing structures. Consequently there will be no impact from the swimming pool redevelopment as it will represent a continuation of the current site and impacts. The formation of the access route will not be visually significant and the provision of additional planting in relation to the enlarged opening in the existing vegetation will further mitigate any potential minor impacts.

The construction /conversion phase of the barn may be visible from a limited number of receptors but this will be confined to glimpsed views of scaffolding. Whilst the barn is significantly screened there may be periods within winter where glimpses of the proposed first floor glazed openings may be visible. As these will be glimpsed views and are confined to a limited number of localised transient receptor locations we have assessed the magnitude of impact as negligible adverse at most.

The site is located within an area of landscape which is susceptible to change.

The current site, similarly to visual impacts, is screened from the surrounding landscape.

The proposed development will maintain or increase this level of screening and is not of a scale which will impact upon the landscape surrounding the site.

We would conclude that in visual impacts the proposed development would have an overall neutral impact upon the site and localised receptors.

Would also conclude that the proposed development would have a neutral to impact upon the surrounding landscape character due to the nature of the existing site and its consequent absence of impacts.

Ref: Newfield Edge Hall: LVIA 23_07_18 Page 12

23/07/18

8. Methodology

a. The Landscape Institute and the Institute of Environmental Management and Assessment have jointly published Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Assessment Third Edition (2013) that gives guidance on carrying out a Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment (LVIA), either as a standalone appraisal or part of an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA). This methodology takes on board the above guidance.

b. When assessing character within an urban context, this methodology can be applied to Townscape Assessments and how the development will affect the elements that make up the townscape and its distinctive character.

c. The main stages of the LVIA process are outlined below. This process will identify and assess the potential effects of a development on the landscape resource and the visual environment.

1. Baseline study

Landscape

 Define the scope of the assessment.

 Outline the planning policy context, including any landscape designations.

 Establish the landscape baseline through a site visit and an assessment of published Landscape Character Assessments to identify the value of the landscape resource (receptor), at community, local, national or international levels where appropriate.

Ref: Newfield Edge Hall: LVIA 23_07_18 Page 13

23/07/18

Visual

 Define the scope of the assessment.

 Identify the extent of visual receptors within the study area, with the use of Zones of Theoretical Visibility (ZTV) where appropriate, and establish the number and sensitivity of the representative viewpoint and/or groups of people (receptors) within the study area whose views may be altered as a result of the proposals.

Project description

The baseline study highlights clear opportunities and constraints for the integration of the proposals into the receiving environment. The aspects of the scheme at each phase that will potentially give rise to effects on the landscape and visual amenity will need identifying. At this time, the proposals can be modified to ensure that further mitigation measures are incorporated into the design as a response to the local landscape and visual environment.

Description of Effects

The level of effect on both landscape and visual receptors should be identified in respect of the different components of the proposed development. In order to assess the significance of the effect on the receiving environment, it is necessary to consider the magnitude, i.e. the degree of change, together with the sensitivity of the receptor.

This will identify whether the effects are:

Adverse or Beneficial - beneficial effects would typically occur where a development could positively contribute to the landscape character or view.

Neutral effects would include changes that neither add nor detract from the quality and character of an area or view. Adverse effects would typically occur where there is loss of landscape elements, or the proposal detracts from the landscape quality and character of an area or view.

Direct or Indirect – A direct effect will be one where a development will affect a view or the character of an area, either beneficially or adversely. An indirect effect will occur as a result of associated development i.e. a development may result in an increase of traffic on a particular route.

Ref: Newfield Edge Hall: LVIA 23_07_18 Page 14

23/07/18

Short, Medium or Long Term – this relates to the expected duration and magnitude of a development. Within this assessment the potential effects are assessed during the Construction Phase, then at Years 1 and 10, following completion of the development.

Reversible or Irreversible – can the resulting effect of a development be mitigated or not, and whether the result of the mitigation is beneficial or adverse.

Significance of Effects (EIA only)

A final judgment on whether the effect is likely to be significant, as required by the Regulations. The summary should draw out the key issues and outline the scope for reducing any negative/ adverse effects. Mitigation measures need to be identified that may reduce the final judgement on the significance of any residual negative effects in the long term.

Assessing the significance of effects

Landscape Sensitivity

1.4. The sensitivity of a particular landscape in relation to new development is categorised as very high, high, medium, low or negligible. This takes into account the susceptibility of the receptor to the type of development proposed and the value attributed to the existing landscape. The following table explains each threshold and the factors that make up the degree of sensitivity.

Ref: Newfield Edge Hall: LVIA 23_07_18 Page 15

23/07/18

Table 1: Landscape Sensitivity Thresholds

Sensitivity Definition

Very High Landscape resource where there is a very high susceptibility to change. Landscapes would be considered of high value, have a high degree of intimacy, strong landscape structure, a high sense of intactness and contain features worthy of protection. Townscapes may include a high proportion of historic assets. Typical examples may be Nationally designated e.g. World Heritage Sites, National Parks, Heritage Coasts, AONB’s etc.

High Landscape Resource where there is a high susceptibility to change. Landscapes would be considered of high value, have a high degree of intimacy, strong landscape structure, relatively intact and contain features worthy of protection. Townscapes may include a high proportion of historic assets. Typical examples may be of Regional or County importance e.g. within the setting of National Parks, AONB’s, Conservation Areas etc

Medium Landscape resource where there is a medium susceptibility to change. Landscapes would be medium scale, good landscape structure, with some detracting features or evidence of recent change. Townscapes may include a proportion of historic assets or of cultural value locally. Typical examples may be designated for their value at District level.

Low Landscape resource where there is a low susceptibility to change. Typical landscapes would be of local landscape interest, and contain evidence of previous landscape change.

Negligible Landscape resource where there is little or no susceptibility to change. Typical landscapes are likely to be degraded, of weak landscape structure, intensive land uses, and require landscape restoration.

Ref: Newfield Edge Hall: LVIA 23_07_18 Page 16

23/07/18

Visual Sensitivity

1.5. The sensitivity of the visual receptor will be assessed against the magnitude of visual change, and is categorised as very high, high, medium, low or negligible. Factors affecting the visual sensitivity will be assessed on whether there will be a loss of views of visual amenity.

Table 2: Visual Sensitivity Thresholds

Sensitivity Definition

Very High Viewers on public rights of way whose prime focus is on the quality of the landscape around, and are often very aware of its value. Examples include viewers within nationally designated landscapes such as National Parks or AONB’s.

High Viewers on public rights of way whose attention may be focused on the landscape, or occupiers of residential properties with primary views affected by the development. Examples include viewers within regional/local landscape designations, users of National Trails, Long Distance Routes or Sustrans cycle routes, or the setting of a listed building.

Medium Viewers engaged in outdoor recreation other than appreciation of the landscape, often within moderate quality landscapes. Examples include outdoor sport activities, outdoor tourist attractions, and occupiers of properties with oblique views affected by the development.

Low Viewers passing through or past the area and not necessarily visiting for the appreciation of the landscape. Examples include rail passengers and road users.

Negligible Viewers whose attention is focused on their work or activity, and not susceptible to changes in the surrounding landscape.

Ref: Newfield Edge Hall: LVIA 23_07_18 Page 17

23/07/18

Effect Magnitude

1.6. The magnitude of change relates to the degree in which proposed development alters the fabric of the landscape character or view. This change is categorised as very high, high, medium, low, or negligible.

Table 3: Magnitude of Change

Magnitude Effect Definition

Very High Change resulting in a significant degree of deterioration or improvement, or introduction of dominant new elements that are considered to make a major alteration to a landscape or view.

High Change resulting in a high degree of deterioration or improvement, or introduction of recognisable new components that may be prominent within a landscape or view.

Medium Change resulting in a moderate degree of deterioration or improvement, or constitutes a noticeable change within a landscape or view.

Low Change resulting in a low degree of deterioration or improvement to a landscape or view, or constitutes only a minor component within a landscape or view.

Negligible Change resulting in a barely perceptible degree of deterioration or improvement to a landscape or view.

No Change It is also possible for a landscape or view to experience no change due to being totally compatible with the local character or not visible due to intervening structures or vegetation.

Ref: Newfield Edge Hall: LVIA 23_07_18 Page 18

23/07/18

Significance Threshold

1.7. The magnitude of change is then considered against the sensitivity of the landscape resource as a receptor or the existing character of the panorama / view. In formulating the significance of effect, reasoned professional judgement is required which is explained within the assessment. This is carried out both in terms of the predicted effects on landscape character or on visual amenities. The significance thresholds are predicted as Substantial, Major, Moderate, Minor, Negligible and None, and can be either beneficial or adverse. Unless otherwise stated, all effects are predicted in the winter months. The extent of mitigation measures should be clearly stated, and in the case of planting proposals, the contribution to reducing adverse effects should be demonstrated at different stages (construction stage, operational stage year 0, and year 10).

Table 4: Significance of Effect

Significance Threshold Definition

Substantial A very high magnitude of change that materially affects a landscape or view of national / international importance that has little or no susceptibility to change.

Major A high magnitude of change that materially affects a landscape or view that has limited susceptibility to change. Positive effects will typically occur in a damaged landscape or view.

Moderate A medium magnitude of change that materially affects a landscape or view that may have the ability to accommodate change. Positive effects will typically occur in a lower quality landscape or view.

Minor A low magnitude of change that materially affects a landscape or view that has the ability to accommodate change. Positive effects will typically occur in a lower quality landscape or view.

Negligible A negligible magnitude of change that has little effect on a landscape or view that has the ability to accommodate change.

None It is also possible for a magnitude of change to occur that results in a neutral effect significance due to the change being compatible with local character or not visible.

Ref: Newfield Edge Hall: LVIA 23_07_18 Page 19

23/07/18

1.8. The significance of the effect is measured on the ability of a landscape or view to accommodate the change. In assessing the significance of effects, the following matrix will be used to determine the significance thresholds, through determining the sensitivity of the receptor and the magnitude of change.

Table 5: Measuring Significance of Effect

Sensitivity of Receptors

Very High High Medium Low Negligible

Very Major/ Moderate/ Substantial Major Moderate High Moderate Minor

Major/ Moderate/ High Major Moderate Minor Moderate Minor

Major/ Moderate/ Minor/ Medium Moderate Minor Moderate Minor Negligible

Magnitude of Change of Magnitude Moderate/ Minor/ Low Moderate Minor Negligible Minor Negligible

Moderate/ Minor/ Negligible Minor Negligible Negligible Minor Negligible

1.9. It should be noted that where there is no perceptible change in terms of the effect magnitude regardless of the sensitivity of the receptor, the significance of the effect on a landscape or view will be none.

1.10. Landscape and visual effects that are Substantial, Major or Major/Moderate are considered to be significant.

1.11. A final written statement summarising the significant effects is provided, supported by the tables and matrices. This conclusion relies on professional judgement that is reasonable, based on clear and transparent methods, suitable training and experience, and a detached and dispassionate view of the development in the final assessment.

Ref: Newfield Edge Hall: LVIA 23_07_18 Page 20

Appendix 1: Image Locations NewfieldNew Field Edge Edge Hall Hall

4km

G 3km

2km

D A 1km

F 0.5km I/J

E Appendix 2: Receptor Images NewfieldNew Field Edge Edge Hall Hall

Site

Image location A: Howgill Lane 1.5km to site Image date 17/07/17 - 50mm lens 35mm format equivalent view @ 1.5m Appendix 2: Receptor Images NewfieldNew Field Edge Edge Hall Hall

Site

Image location B: Footpath Weets Hill 1.2km to site Image date 17/07/17 - 50mm lens 35mm format equivalent view @ 1.5m Appendix 2: Receptor Images NewNewfield Field Edge Edge Hall Hall

Site

Image location C1 : Site access 240 m to site Image date 17/07/17 - 50mm lens 35mm format equivalent view @ 1.5m Appendix 2: Receptor Images NewfieldNew Field Edge Edge Hall Hall

Site

Image location C2 : Site access 240 m to site Image date 17/07/17 - 50mm lens 35mm format equivalent view @ 1.5m Appendix 2: Receptor Images NewNewfield Field Edge Edge Hall Hall

Site

Image location D1 : A682 1.4 km to site Image date 01/09/17 - 50mm lens 35mm format equivalent view @ 1.5m Appendix 2: Receptor Images NewfieldNew Field Edge Edge Hall Hall

Site

Image location E1 : A682 1.0 km to site Image date 01/09/17 - 50mm lens 35mm format equivalent view @ 1.5m Appendix 2: Receptor Images NewfieldNew Field Edge Edge Hall Hall

Site

Image location E2 : A682 600 m to site Image date 01/09/17 - 50mm lens 35mm format equivalent view @ 1.5m Appendix 2: Receptor Images NewfieldNew Field Edge Edge Hall Hall

Site

Image location F1 : Stocks Lane 370 m to site Image date 17/07/17 - 50mm lens 35mm format equivalent view @ 1.5m Appendix 2: Receptor Images NewfieldNew Field Edge Edge Hall Hall

Site Site

Image location F2 : Stocks Lane 350 m to site Image date 01/09/17 - 50mm lens 35mm format equivalent view @ 1.5m Appendix 2: Receptor Images NewfieldNew Field Edge Edge Hall Hall

Newfield Site Edge Hall

Site

Image location F3 : Stocks Lane 370 m to site Image date 01/09/17 - 50mm lens 35mm format equivalent view @ 1.5m Appendix 2: Receptor Images NewNewfield Field Edge Edge Hall Hall

Site Site

Image location F4 : Stocks Lane 370 m to site Image date 01/09/17 - 50mm lens 35mm format equivalent view @ 1.5m Appendix 2: Receptor Images Newfield Edge Hall

Site

Hall

Northern gable - Barn

Image location F5 : Highway entrance to Newfield Edge 280 m to site Image date 09/07/18 - 50mm lens 35mm format equivalent view @ 1.5m Appendix 2: Receptor Images NewfieldNew Field Edge Edge Hall Hall

Site

Image location G1 : A59 6.0 km to site Image date 01/09/17 - 50mm lens 35mm format equivalent view @ 1.5m Appendix 2: Receptor Images NewfieldNew Field Edge Edge Hall Hall

Site

Image location H1 : Holden Lane 9.0 km to site Image date 01/09/17 - 50mm lens 35mm format equivalent view @ 1.5m Appendix 2: Receptor Images Newfield Edge Hall

Site

Hall Site

Barn

Image location I1 : Coal Pit Lane 390 m to site Image date 09/07/18 - 50mm lens 35mm format equivalent view @ 1.5m Appendix 2: Receptor Images Newfield Edge Hall

Site

Image location I2 : Coal Pit Lane 365 m to site Image date 09/07/18 - 50mm lens 35mm format equivalent view @ 1.5m Appendix 2: Receptor Images Newfield Edge Hall

Site Barn - Eastern elevation

Site

Image location J1 : Footpath from Newfield Edge 60 m to site Image date 09/07/18 - 50mm lens 35mm format equivalent view @ 1.5m Appendix 2a: Internal Site Images Newfield Edge Hall

External view: Northern boundary adjacent to barn