Functional Analysis

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Functional Analysis Functional Analysis Peter Philip∗ Lecture Notes Originally Created for the Class of Summer Semester 2017 at LMU Munich Includes Subsequent Corrections and Revisions† September 19, 2021 Contents 1 Topological Vector Spaces 3 1.1 BasicDefinitionsandProperties . ... 3 1.2 Finite-DimensionalSpaces . .. 14 1.3 Metrization .................................. 16 1.4 Boundedness, Cauchy Sequences, Continuity . ...... 21 1.5 SeminormsandLocalConvexity. 25 1.6 FurtherExamples............................... 33 2 Main Theorems 37 2.1 BaireCategory ................................ 37 2.2 Uniform Boundedness Principle, Banach-Steinhaus Theorem ....... 46 2.3 OpenMappingTheorem ........................... 52 2.4 ClosedGraphTheorem............................ 56 2.4.1 TheTheorem ............................. 56 2.4.2 ApplicationtoSequenceSpaces . 59 ∗E-Mail: [email protected] †Resources used in the preparation of this text include [Els07, Rud73, Wer11]. 1 CONTENTS 2 3 Convexity 63 3.1 Hahn-BanachTheorems ........................... 63 3.2 WeakTopology,WeakConvergence . 69 3.3 Banach-Alaoglu ................................ 78 3.4 ExtremePoints,Krein-Milman. .. 85 4 Duality, Representation Theorems 89 4.1 GeneralNormedSpace,AdjointOperators . .. 89 4.2 Hilbert Space, Riesz Representation Theorem I . ..... 97 4.3 ComplexMeasures,Radon-NikodymTheorem . 116 4.4 Lp-Spaces,RieszRepresentationTheoremII . 126 4.5 Borel Measures on Locally Compact Hausdorff Spaces and Riesz Repre- sentationTheoremsIIIandIV. 132 A Exhaustion by Compact Sets 155 B InterchangingDerivativeswithPointwiseLimits 156 CWeierstrassApproximationTheorem 156 D Topological Invariants 159 E Orthogonalization 160 F Tietze-Urysohn Theorem 161 G Partition of Unity 167 References 168 1 TOPOLOGICAL VECTOR SPACES 3 1 Topological Vector Spaces 1.1 Basic Definitions and Properties As in Analysis I–III, we write K to denote R or C. The central topic of (linear) Functional Analysis is the investigation and representation of continuous linear functionals, i.e. of continuous linear functions f : X K, where X is a vector space over K. To know what continuity of f means, we need−→ to specify topologies on X and K. On K, we will always consider the standard topology (induced by ), unless another topology is explicitly specified. While one will, in general, want to study|·| many different vector spaces X with many different topologies , should at least be compatible with the linear structure on X, giving rise to the followingT T definition: Definition 1.1. Let X be a vector space over K and let be a topology on X. Then the topological space (X, ) is called a topological vectorT space if, and only if, addition and scalar multiplication areT continuous, i.e. if, and only if, the maps +: X X X, (x,y) x + y, (1.1a) × −→ 7→ : K X X, (λ,x) λx, (1.1b) · × −→ 7→ are continuous (with respect to the respective product topology). Example 1.2. (a) Every normed vector space (X, ) over K is a topological vector k · k space: Let (xk)k N and (yk)k N be sequences in X with limk xk = x X and ∈ ∈ →∞ ∈ limk yk = y X. Then limk (xk + yk)= x + y by [Phi16b, (2.20a)], showing →∞ ∈ →∞ continuity of addition. Now let (λk)k N be a sequence in K such that limk λk = ∈ + →∞ λ K. Then ( λk )k N is bounded by some M R0 and ∈ | | ∈ ∈ λ x λx λ x λ x + λ x λx M x x + λ λ x 0 for k , k k k− k ≤ k k k− k k k k − k≤ k k− k | k− | k k → → ∞ showing limk (λkxk) = λx and the continuity of scalar multiplication. We will →∞ see in Sec. 1.2 below that, for dim X < , the norm topology on X is the only T ∞ 1 topology on X that makes X into a topological vector space (but cf. (b) below). (b) Let X be a vector space over K. With the indiscrete topology, X is always a topological vector space (the continuity of addition and scalar multiplication is trivial). If X = 0 , then the indiscrete space is not T1 and, hence, not metrizable (cf. [Phi16b, Sec.6 { 3.1]).} If X = 0 , then, with the discrete topology, X is never a topological vector space: While6 addition{ } is continuous (since X X is also discrete), scalar multiplication is not: Let 0 = x X. Then, while x× X is open, the 1 6 ∈ { } ⊆ preimage P := ( )− ( x ) is not open in K X: Let(λ,y) P , i.e. λy = x. If P were open, then there· had{ to} be an open neighborhood× O of λ∈ such that O y P , × { }⊆ in contradiction to λ being the unique element of K such that λy = x. 1 TOPOLOGICAL VECTOR SPACES 4 (c) Let (Ω, ,µ) be a measure space. Then, for each 0 < p , both p(µ) and Lp(µ) areA topological vector spaces: First, let 1 p . Then≤ ∞ Lp(µ) isL a special case of (a), and, for, p(µ) one observes that the≤ arguments≤ ∞ of (a) still work if the norm is replaced by aL seminorm (since seminormed spaces are still first countable, cf. [Phi16b, Th. 2.8]). If there exists a nonempty µ-null set, then p(µ) is not L T1 (in particular, not metrizable), cf. [Phi17, Def. and Rem. 2.41]. Now consider 0 <p< 1. We know from [Phi17, Def. and Rem. 2.41] that p(µ) is a pseudometric L space, where the pseudometric dp is defined by 1/p d : p(µ) p(µ) R+, d (f,g) := N p(f g), N (f) := f p dµ , p L ×L −→ 0 p p − p | | ZΩ and Lp(µ) is the corresponding (factor) metric space. Like metric spaces, pseu- dometric spaces are first countable and we can show continuity using sequences p according to [Phi16b, Th. 2.8]. Let (fk)k N and (gk)k N be sequences in (µ) with p ∈ p ∈ L limk fk = f (µ) and limk gk = g (µ). Then →∞ ∈L →∞ ∈L [Phi17, (2.51a)] d (f + g ,f + g)= N p f + g (f + g) N p(f f)+ N p(g g) p k k p k k − ≤ p k − p k − = dp(fk,f)+ dp(gk,g) 0 for k , → → ∞ showing continuity of addition. Now let (λk)k N be a sequence in K such that ∈ + limk λk = λ K. Then ( λk )k N is bounded by some M R0 and →∞ ∈ | | ∈ ∈ d (λ f ,λf) d (λ f ,λ f)+ d (λ f,λf) p k k ≤ p k k k p k p p = λ f λ f dµ + λ f λf dµ k k − k k − ZΩ ZΩ M p d (f ,f)+ λ λ p N p(f) 0 for k , ≤ p k | k − | p → → ∞ showing limk (λkfk) = λf and the continuity of scalar multiplication. As for →∞ p p 1, if there exists a nonempty µ-null set, then (µ) is not T1 (in particular, not≥ metrizable), again cf. [Phi17, Def. and Rem. 2.41].L We will see in Ex. 1.11(b) that, for 0 <p< 1, balls in Lp([0, 1], 1,λ1), where 1 denotes the usual σ-algebra of Lebesgue-measurable sets and λ1 denotesL LebesgueL measure, are not convex. In particular, the metric d is not generated by any norm on Lp([0, 1], 1,λ1). p L (d) Consider X := KR = (R, K), i.e. the set of functions f : R K, with the product topology (i.e.F the topology of pointwise convergence).−→ We know from T [Phi16b, Ex. 1.53(c)] that is not metrizable (however, is T2 by [Phi16b, Prop. 3.5(b)]). We show that (X,T ) is a topological vector spaceT over K: According T to [Phi16b, Ex. 2.12(c)], we have to show that, for each f,g : R K, each −→ 1 TOPOLOGICAL VECTOR SPACES 5 λ K, and each t R, (f,g) f(t)+ g(t) is continuous at (f,g), (λ,f) λf(t) is∈ continuous at (λ,f∈ ). Due7→ to the continuity of the maps + : K K7→ K, + × −→ : K K K, given ǫ R , there exist neighborhoods Uf , Ug, Uλ of f(t), g(t), and· λ×, respectively,−→ such that∈ z + w Bǫ f(t)+ g(t) , µz Bǫ λf(t) . (z,w) ∀Uf Ug ∈ (µ,z) ∀Uλ Uf ∈ ∈ × ∈ × 1 1 Letting Vf := πt− (Uf ), Vg := πt− (Ug), we obtain f˜(t)+˜g(t) Bǫ f(t)+ g(t) , (f,˜ g˜) ∀V Vg ∈ ∈ f × proving continuity of addition on X. We also have µf˜(t) Bǫ λf(t) , (µ,f˜) ∀U V ∈ ∈ λ× f proving continuity of scalar multiplication. — In certain situations, the following notation has already been used in both Analysis and Linear Algebra: Notation 1.3. Let X be a vector space over K, let (X) (where (X) denotes the power set of X), A, B X, x X, and λ K. DefineA⊆P P ⊆ ∈ ∈ x + A := x + a : a A , (1.2a) { ∈ } A + B := a + b : a A, b B , (1.2b) { ∈ ∈ } λA := λa : a A , (1.2c) { ∈ } x + := x + A : A . (1.2d) A { ∈ A} Note that, in general, the familiar arithmetic laws do not hold for set arithmetic: For example, if X = 0 , then X X = X = 0 ; if 0 = x X, A := x,x , then 0 A + A, but6 0 /{ 2}A, i.e. 2A =− A + A. 6 { } 6 ∈ {− } ∈ ∈ 6 Proposition 1.4. Let (X, ) be a topological vector space over K. T (a) For each a X and each λ K 0 , the maps ∈ ∈ \ { } T ,M : X X, T (x) := x + a, M (x) := λx, (1.3) a λ −→ a λ 1 1 − are homeomorphisms, where Ta− = T a, Mλ− = Mλ 1 . − 1 TOPOLOGICAL VECTOR SPACES 6 (b) is both translation-invariant and scaling-invariant, i.e. the following holds for eachT O X: ⊆ O open O + a open λO open . ⇔ a ∀X ⇔ λ K∀ 0 ∈ ∈ \{ } (c) Let x,a X, U X, λ K 0 .
Recommended publications
  • Completeness in Quasi-Pseudometric Spaces—A Survey
    mathematics Article Completeness in Quasi-Pseudometric Spaces—A Survey ¸StefanCobzas Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science, Babe¸s-BolyaiUniversity, 400 084 Cluj-Napoca, Romania; [email protected] Received:17 June 2020; Accepted: 24 July 2020; Published: 3 August 2020 Abstract: The aim of this paper is to discuss the relations between various notions of sequential completeness and the corresponding notions of completeness by nets or by filters in the setting of quasi-metric spaces. We propose a new definition of right K-Cauchy net in a quasi-metric space for which the corresponding completeness is equivalent to the sequential completeness. In this way we complete some results of R. A. Stoltenberg, Proc. London Math. Soc. 17 (1967), 226–240, and V. Gregori and J. Ferrer, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc., III Ser., 49 (1984), 36. A discussion on nets defined over ordered or pre-ordered directed sets is also included. Keywords: metric space; quasi-metric space; uniform space; quasi-uniform space; Cauchy sequence; Cauchy net; Cauchy filter; completeness MSC: 54E15; 54E25; 54E50; 46S99 1. Introduction It is well known that completeness is an essential tool in the study of metric spaces, particularly for fixed points results in such spaces. The study of completeness in quasi-metric spaces is considerably more involved, due to the lack of symmetry of the distance—there are several notions of completeness all agreing with the usual one in the metric case (see [1] or [2]). Again these notions are essential in proving fixed point results in quasi-metric spaces as it is shown by some papers on this topic as, for instance, [3–6] (see also the book [7]).
    [Show full text]
  • Metric Geometry in a Tame Setting
    University of California Los Angeles Metric Geometry in a Tame Setting A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Mathematics by Erik Walsberg 2015 c Copyright by Erik Walsberg 2015 Abstract of the Dissertation Metric Geometry in a Tame Setting by Erik Walsberg Doctor of Philosophy in Mathematics University of California, Los Angeles, 2015 Professor Matthias J. Aschenbrenner, Chair We prove basic results about the topology and metric geometry of metric spaces which are definable in o-minimal expansions of ordered fields. ii The dissertation of Erik Walsberg is approved. Yiannis N. Moschovakis Chandrashekhar Khare David Kaplan Matthias J. Aschenbrenner, Committee Chair University of California, Los Angeles 2015 iii To Sam. iv Table of Contents 1 Introduction :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: 1 2 Conventions :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: 5 3 Metric Geometry ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: 7 3.1 Metric Spaces . 7 3.2 Maps Between Metric Spaces . 8 3.3 Covers and Packing Inequalities . 9 3.3.1 The 5r-covering Lemma . 9 3.3.2 Doubling Metrics . 10 3.4 Hausdorff Measures and Dimension . 11 3.4.1 Hausdorff Measures . 11 3.4.2 Hausdorff Dimension . 13 3.5 Topological Dimension . 15 3.6 Left-Invariant Metrics on Groups . 15 3.7 Reductions, Ultralimits and Limits of Metric Spaces . 16 3.7.1 Reductions of Λ-valued Metric Spaces . 16 3.7.2 Ultralimits . 17 3.7.3 GH-Convergence and GH-Ultralimits . 18 3.7.4 Asymptotic Cones . 19 3.7.5 Tangent Cones . 22 3.7.6 Conical Metric Spaces . 22 3.8 Normed Spaces . 23 4 T-Convexity :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: 24 4.1 T-convex Structures .
    [Show full text]
  • Fundamentals of Functional Analysis Kluwer Texts in the Mathematical Sciences
    Fundamentals of Functional Analysis Kluwer Texts in the Mathematical Sciences VOLUME 12 A Graduate-Level Book Series The titles published in this series are listed at the end of this volume. Fundamentals of Functional Analysis by S. S. Kutateladze Sobolev Institute ofMathematics, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russia Springer-Science+Business Media, B.V. A C.I.P. Catalogue record for this book is available from the Library of Congress ISBN 978-90-481-4661-1 ISBN 978-94-015-8755-6 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-94-015-8755-6 Translated from OCHOBbI Ij)YHK~HOHaJIl>HODO aHaJIHsa. J/IS;l\~ 2, ;l\OIIOJIHeHHoe., Sobo1ev Institute of Mathematics, Novosibirsk, © 1995 S. S. Kutate1adze Printed on acid-free paper All Rights Reserved © 1996 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht Originally published by Kluwer Academic Publishers in 1996. Softcover reprint of the hardcover 1st edition 1996 No part of the material protected by this copyright notice may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system, without written permission from the copyright owner. Contents Preface to the English Translation ix Preface to the First Russian Edition x Preface to the Second Russian Edition xii Chapter 1. An Excursion into Set Theory 1.1. Correspondences . 1 1.2. Ordered Sets . 3 1.3. Filters . 6 Exercises . 8 Chapter 2. Vector Spaces 2.1. Spaces and Subspaces ... ......................... 10 2.2. Linear Operators . 12 2.3. Equations in Operators ........................ .. 15 Exercises . 18 Chapter 3. Convex Analysis 3.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Exercise Set 13 Top04-E013 ; November 26, 2004 ; 9:45 A.M
    Prof. D. P.Patil, Department of Mathematics, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore August-December 2004 MA-231 Topology 13. Function spaces1) —————————— — Uniform Convergence, Stone-Weierstrass theorem, Arzela-Ascoli theorem ———————————————————————————————– November 22, 2004 Karl Theodor Wilhelm Weierstrass† Marshall Harvey Stone†† (1815-1897) (1903-1989) First recall the following definitions and results : Our overall aim in this section is the study of the compactness and completeness properties of a subset F of the set Y X of all maps from a space X into a space Y . To do this a usable topology must be introduced on F (presumably related to the structures of X and Y ) and when this is has been done F is called a f unction space. N13.1 . (The Topology of Pointwise Convergence 2) Let X be any set, Y be any topological space and let fn : X → Y , n ∈ N, be a sequence of maps. We say that the sequence (fn)n∈N is pointwise convergent,ifforeverypoint x ∈X, the sequence fn(x) , n∈N,inY is convergent. a). The (Tychonoff) product topology on Y X is determined solely by the topology of Y (even if X is a topological X X space) the structure on X plays no part. A sequence fn : X →Y , n∈N,inY converges to a function f in Y if and only if for every point x ∈X, the sequence fn(x) , n∈N,inY is convergent. This provides the reason for the name the topology of pointwise convergence;this topology is also simply called the pointwise topology andisdenoted by Tptc .
    [Show full text]
  • Surjective Isometries on Grassmann Spaces 11
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Repository of the Academy's Library SURJECTIVE ISOMETRIES ON GRASSMANN SPACES FERNANDA BOTELHO, JAMES JAMISON, AND LAJOS MOLNAR´ Abstract. Let H be a complex Hilbert space, n a given positive integer and let Pn(H) be the set of all projections on H with rank n. Under the condition dim H ≥ 4n, we describe the surjective isometries of Pn(H) with respect to the gap metric (the metric induced by the operator norm). 1. Introduction The study of isometries of function spaces or operator algebras is an important research area in functional analysis with history dating back to the 1930's. The most classical results in the area are the Banach-Stone theorem describing the surjective linear isometries between Banach spaces of complex- valued continuous functions on compact Hausdorff spaces and its noncommutative extension for general C∗-algebras due to Kadison. This has the surprising and remarkable consequence that the surjective linear isometries between C∗-algebras are closely related to algebra isomorphisms. More precisely, every such surjective linear isometry is a Jordan *-isomorphism followed by multiplication by a fixed unitary element. We point out that in the aforementioned fundamental results the underlying structures are algebras and the isometries are assumed to be linear. However, descriptions of isometries of non-linear structures also play important roles in several areas. We only mention one example which is closely related with the subject matter of this paper. This is the famous Wigner's theorem that describes the structure of quantum mechanical symmetry transformations and plays a fundamental role in the probabilistic aspects of quantum theory.
    [Show full text]
  • Topological Vector Spaces and Algebras
    Joseph Muscat 2015 1 Topological Vector Spaces and Algebras [email protected] 1 June 2016 1 Topological Vector Spaces over R or C Recall that a topological vector space is a vector space with a T0 topology such that addition and the field action are continuous. When the field is F := R or C, the field action is called scalar multiplication. Examples: A N • R , such as sequences R , with pointwise convergence. p • Sequence spaces ℓ (real or complex) with topology generated by Br = (a ): p a p < r , where p> 0. { n n | n| } p p p p • LebesgueP spaces L (A) with Br = f : A F, measurable, f < r (p> 0). { → | | } R p • Products and quotients by closed subspaces are again topological vector spaces. If π : Y X are linear maps, then the vector space Y with the ini- i → i tial topology is a topological vector space, which is T0 when the πi are collectively 1-1. The set of (continuous linear) morphisms is denoted by B(X, Y ). The mor- phisms B(X, F) are called ‘functionals’. +, , Finitely- Locally Bounded First ∗ → Generated Separable countable Top. Vec. Spaces ///// Lp 0 <p< 1 ℓp[0, 1] (ℓp)N (ℓp)R p ∞ N n R 2 Locally Convex ///// L p > 1 L R , C(R ) R pointwise, ℓweak Inner Product ///// L2 ℓ2[0, 1] ///// ///// Locally Compact Rn ///// ///// ///// ///// 1. A set is balanced when λ 6 1 λA A. | | ⇒ ⊆ (a) The image and pre-image of balanced sets are balanced. ◦ (b) The closure and interior are again balanced (if A 0; since λA = (λA)◦ A◦); as are the union, intersection, sum,∈ scaling, T and prod- uct A ⊆B of balanced sets.
    [Show full text]
  • FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS 1. Banach and Hilbert Spaces in What
    FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS PIOTR HAJLASZ 1. Banach and Hilbert spaces In what follows K will denote R of C. Definition. A normed space is a pair (X, k · k), where X is a linear space over K and k · k : X → [0, ∞) is a function, called a norm, such that (1) kx + yk ≤ kxk + kyk for all x, y ∈ X; (2) kαxk = |α|kxk for all x ∈ X and α ∈ K; (3) kxk = 0 if and only if x = 0. Since kx − yk ≤ kx − zk + kz − yk for all x, y, z ∈ X, d(x, y) = kx − yk defines a metric in a normed space. In what follows normed paces will always be regarded as metric spaces with respect to the metric d. A normed space is called a Banach space if it is complete with respect to the metric d. Definition. Let X be a linear space over K (=R or C). The inner product (scalar product) is a function h·, ·i : X × X → K such that (1) hx, xi ≥ 0; (2) hx, xi = 0 if and only if x = 0; (3) hαx, yi = αhx, yi; (4) hx1 + x2, yi = hx1, yi + hx2, yi; (5) hx, yi = hy, xi, for all x, x1, x2, y ∈ X and all α ∈ K. As an obvious corollary we obtain hx, y1 + y2i = hx, y1i + hx, y2i, hx, αyi = αhx, yi , Date: February 12, 2009. 1 2 PIOTR HAJLASZ for all x, y1, y2 ∈ X and α ∈ K. For a space with an inner product we define kxk = phx, xi . Lemma 1.1 (Schwarz inequality).
    [Show full text]
  • Functional Analysis Lecture Notes Chapter 3. Banach
    FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS LECTURE NOTES CHAPTER 3. BANACH SPACES CHRISTOPHER HEIL 1. Elementary Properties and Examples Notation 1.1. Throughout, F will denote either the real line R or the complex plane C. All vector spaces are assumed to be over the field F. Definition 1.2. Let X be a vector space over the field F. Then a semi-norm on X is a function k · k: X ! R such that (a) kxk ≥ 0 for all x 2 X, (b) kαxk = jαj kxk for all x 2 X and α 2 F, (c) Triangle Inequality: kx + yk ≤ kxk + kyk for all x, y 2 X. A norm on X is a semi-norm which also satisfies: (d) kxk = 0 =) x = 0. A vector space X together with a norm k · k is called a normed linear space, a normed vector space, or simply a normed space. Definition 1.3. Let I be a finite or countable index set (for example, I = f1; : : : ; Ng if finite, or I = N or Z if infinite). Let w : I ! [0; 1). Given a sequence of scalars x = (xi)i2I , set 1=p jx jp w(i)p ; 0 < p < 1; 8 i kxkp;w = > Xi2I <> sup jxij w(i); p = 1; i2I > where these quantities could be infinite.:> Then we set p `w(I) = x = (xi)i2I : kxkp < 1 : n o p p p We call `w(I) a weighted ` space, and often denote it just by `w (especially if I = N). If p p w(i) = 1 for all i, then we simply call this space ` (I) or ` and write k · kp instead of k · kp;w.
    [Show full text]
  • Elements of Linear Algebra, Topology, and Calculus
    00˙AMS September 23, 2007 © Copyright, Princeton University Press. No part of this book may be distributed, posted, or reproduced in any form by digital or mechanical means without prior written permission of the publisher. Appendix A Elements of Linear Algebra, Topology, and Calculus A.1 LINEAR ALGEBRA We follow the usual conventions of matrix computations. Rn×p is the set of all n p real matrices (m rows and p columns). Rn is the set Rn×1 of column vectors× with n real entries. A(i, j) denotes the i, j entry (ith row, jth column) of the matrix A. Given A Rm×n and B Rn×p, the matrix product Rm×p ∈ n ∈ AB is defined by (AB)(i, j) = k=1 A(i, k)B(k, j), i = 1, . , m, j = 1∈, . , p. AT is the transpose of the matrix A:(AT )(i, j) = A(j, i). The entries A(i, i) form the diagonal of A. A Pmatrix is square if is has the same number of rows and columns. When A and B are square matrices of the same dimension, [A, B] = AB BA is termed the commutator of A and B. A matrix A is symmetric if −AT = A and skew-symmetric if AT = A. The commutator of two symmetric matrices or two skew-symmetric matrices− is symmetric, and the commutator of a symmetric and a skew-symmetric matrix is skew-symmetric. The trace of A is the sum of the diagonal elements of A, min(n,p ) tr(A) = A(i, i). i=1 X We have the following properties (assuming that A and B have adequate dimensions) tr(A) = tr(AT ), (A.1a) tr(AB) = tr(BA), (A.1b) tr([A, B]) = 0, (A.1c) tr(B) = 0 if BT = B, (A.1d) − tr(AB) = 0 if AT = A and BT = B.
    [Show full text]
  • Functional Analysis Lecture Notes Chapter 2. Operators on Hilbert Spaces
    FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS LECTURE NOTES CHAPTER 2. OPERATORS ON HILBERT SPACES CHRISTOPHER HEIL 1. Elementary Properties and Examples First recall the basic definitions regarding operators. Definition 1.1 (Continuous and Bounded Operators). Let X, Y be normed linear spaces, and let L: X Y be a linear operator. ! (a) L is continuous at a point f X if f f in X implies Lf Lf in Y . 2 n ! n ! (b) L is continuous if it is continuous at every point, i.e., if fn f in X implies Lfn Lf in Y for every f. ! ! (c) L is bounded if there exists a finite K 0 such that ≥ f X; Lf K f : 8 2 k k ≤ k k Note that Lf is the norm of Lf in Y , while f is the norm of f in X. k k k k (d) The operator norm of L is L = sup Lf : k k kfk=1 k k (e) We let (X; Y ) denote the set of all bounded linear operators mapping X into Y , i.e., B (X; Y ) = L: X Y : L is bounded and linear : B f ! g If X = Y = X then we write (X) = (X; X). B B (f) If Y = F then we say that L is a functional. The set of all bounded linear functionals on X is the dual space of X, and is denoted X0 = (X; F) = L: X F : L is bounded and linear : B f ! g We saw in Chapter 1 that, for a linear operator, boundedness and continuity are equivalent.
    [Show full text]
  • Functional Analysis 1 Winter Semester 2013-14
    Functional analysis 1 Winter semester 2013-14 1. Topological vector spaces Basic notions. Notation. (a) The symbol F stands for the set of all reals or for the set of all complex numbers. (b) Let (X; τ) be a topological space and x 2 X. An open set G containing x is called neigh- borhood of x. We denote τ(x) = fG 2 τ; x 2 Gg. Definition. Suppose that τ is a topology on a vector space X over F such that • (X; τ) is T1, i.e., fxg is a closed set for every x 2 X, and • the vector space operations are continuous with respect to τ, i.e., +: X × X ! X and ·: F × X ! X are continuous. Under these conditions, τ is said to be a vector topology on X and (X; +; ·; τ) is a topological vector space (TVS). Remark. Let X be a TVS. (a) For every a 2 X the mapping x 7! x + a is a homeomorphism of X onto X. (b) For every λ 2 F n f0g the mapping x 7! λx is a homeomorphism of X onto X. Definition. Let X be a vector space over F. We say that A ⊂ X is • balanced if for every α 2 F, jαj ≤ 1, we have αA ⊂ A, • absorbing if for every x 2 X there exists t 2 R; t > 0; such that x 2 tA, • symmetric if A = −A. Definition. Let X be a TVS and A ⊂ X. We say that A is bounded if for every V 2 τ(0) there exists s > 0 such that for every t > s we have A ⊂ tV .
    [Show full text]
  • General Topology
    General Topology Tom Leinster 2014{15 Contents A Topological spaces2 A1 Review of metric spaces.......................2 A2 The definition of topological space.................8 A3 Metrics versus topologies....................... 13 A4 Continuous maps........................... 17 A5 When are two spaces homeomorphic?................ 22 A6 Topological properties........................ 26 A7 Bases................................. 28 A8 Closure and interior......................... 31 A9 Subspaces (new spaces from old, 1)................. 35 A10 Products (new spaces from old, 2)................. 39 A11 Quotients (new spaces from old, 3)................. 43 A12 Review of ChapterA......................... 48 B Compactness 51 B1 The definition of compactness.................... 51 B2 Closed bounded intervals are compact............... 55 B3 Compactness and subspaces..................... 56 B4 Compactness and products..................... 58 B5 The compact subsets of Rn ..................... 59 B6 Compactness and quotients (and images)............. 61 B7 Compact metric spaces........................ 64 C Connectedness 68 C1 The definition of connectedness................... 68 C2 Connected subsets of the real line.................. 72 C3 Path-connectedness.......................... 76 C4 Connected-components and path-components........... 80 1 Chapter A Topological spaces A1 Review of metric spaces For the lecture of Thursday, 18 September 2014 Almost everything in this section should have been covered in Honours Analysis, with the possible exception of some of the examples. For that reason, this lecture is longer than usual. Definition A1.1 Let X be a set. A metric on X is a function d: X × X ! [0; 1) with the following three properties: • d(x; y) = 0 () x = y, for x; y 2 X; • d(x; y) + d(y; z) ≥ d(x; z) for all x; y; z 2 X (triangle inequality); • d(x; y) = d(y; x) for all x; y 2 X (symmetry).
    [Show full text]