DOCSLIB.ORG

Bowers and Martin Classification, First Metatarophalangeal Joint, 77 Boyd and Griffin Classification, Intertrochanteric Fracture

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bowers and Martin Classification, First Metatarophalangeal Joint, 77 Boyd and Griffin Classification, Intertrochanteric Fracture Index A Bowers and Martin Acetabulum, Judet-Letournel classification, first classification, 39 metatarophalangeal joint, Acromioclavicular joint, 77 Rockwood classification, Boyd and Griffin 12–14 classification, Allen classification, C3–C7 intertrochanteric injuries, 4–5 fractures, 46 Anderson and D’Alonzo classification, odontoid C process fractures, 2–3 C3–C7 injuries, Allen Anderson and Montisano classification, 4–5 classification, occipital Calcaneal fractures, 68–71 condyle fractures, 1 children, Schmidt and Ankle, 61–67 Weiner classification, 89 Danis-Weber classification, extraarticular, classification 66–67 of, 68 Lauge-Hansen intraarticular, Essex- classification, 61–66 Lopresti classification, Anterior glenohumeral 68–69 dislocations, Sanders classification, classification, 16 70–71 Atlantoaxial rotatory Soure and Remy subluxation and classification, 69 dislocation, Fielding Capitellum fractures, classification, 2 classification, 24 Atlanto-occipital dislocation, Cervical spine. See Spine position of occiput Children, fractures in relation to C1, 1 calcaneal, 89 Atlas fractures, Levine and forearm, 85 Edwards classification, 1 hip, 86 lateral condylar physeal, B 81–82 Bado classification, medial condylar physeal, 82 Monteggia fracture, radial head and neck, 28–29 83–85 98 INDEX Children, fractures in (cont.) Delbet classification, hip Salter-Harris classification, fractures, children, 86 79–80 Delee classification, lateral scaphoid, 85 condylar physeal supracondylar humerus, fractures, children, 82 80–81 Denis classification t-condylar, 82 sacral fractures, 10 tibial spine, 87 thoracolumbar spine tibial tuberosity, 88 fractures, 6–9 transphyseal, 79–80, 82 Distal femur, 53–54 Chopart joint, Main and AO classification, 53–54 Jowell classification, descriptive classification, 71–72 53 Clavical, 11–14 Distal humerus, descriptive acromioclavicular joint, classification, 20 12–14 Distal phalanx fractures, Craig classification, 11–12 Kaplan classification, 36 sternoclavicular joint, Distal radius 14 descriptive classification, Condylar fractures, Milch 30–31 classification, 23 Frykman classification, 30 Cooke and Newman, hip Duncan and Masri fractures, periprosthetic, classification, hip 90–91 fractures, periprosthetic, Coracoid fractures, Eyres and 90 Brooks classification, 15–16 E Coronoid process fracture, Eichenholtz and Levin Regan and Morrey classification, navicular classification, 25 fractures, 72 Craig classification, clavical, Elbow dislocation, 11–12 classification, 27 Craniovertebral dissociation, Elbow periprosthetic position of occiput fractures, classification, relation to C1, 1 95 Cuboid fractures, OTA Epstein classification, classification, 74 anterior hip dislocations, 40–41 D Essex-Lopresti classification, Dameron classification, fifth ankle, intraarticular metatarsal (base) fractures, 68–69 fractures, 77 Evans classification, Danis-Weber classification, intertrochanteric ankle, 66–67 fractures, 47 INDEX 99 Extraarticular fractures talus fractures, 67 calcaneal, 68 tarsometatarsal joint, 75–77 thumb, 35 Forearm Eyres and Brooks children, descriptive classification, coracoid classification, 85 fractures, 15–16 descriptive classification, 28 Monteggia fracture, 28–29 F Frykman classification, distal Femoral head radius, 30 Pipkin subclassification, 43 Thompson & Epstein G subclassification, 43 Garden classification, femoral Femoral neck fractures, neck fractures, 45 44–45 Gartland classification, anatomic location, supracondylar humerus classification by, 44 fractures, children, 80 Garden classification, 45 Goldberg classification, tibia, Pauwels classification, 44 periprosthetic fractures, Femoral periprosthetic 92 fractures, Lewis and Gustilo and Anderson Rorabeck classification, classification of Open 92–93 fractures, 59 Femoral shaft, 51–52 descriptive classification, 51 H Winquist and Hansen Hangman’s fracture, Levine classification, 52 and Edwards Fielding classification classification, 3–4 atlantoaxial rotatory Hawkins classification, talar subluxation and neck fractures, 67–68 dislocation, 2 Herbert and Fisher subtrochanteric fractures, classification, scaphoid 48 fractures, 32–33 Foot, 67–78 Hip dislocations, 40–54 calcaneal fractures, 68–71 anterior dislocations, 40–41 cuboid fractures, 74 distal femur, 53–54 fifth metatarsal (base) Epstein classification, 40–41 fractures, 77 femoral head, 43 first metatarsal, 77–78 femoral neck fractures, metatarophalangeal joint, 44–45 77–78 femoral shaft, 51–52 midfoot fractures, 71–78 intertrochanteric fractures, midtarsal joint, 71–72 46–47 navicular fractures, 72–74 posterior dislocations, talar neck fractures, 67–68 42–54 100 INDEX Hip dislocations (cont.) Johansson classification, hip subtrochanteric fractures, fractures, periprosthetic, 48–51 90 Thompson and Epstein Judet-Letournel classification, classification, 42 acetabulum, 39 Hip fractures, Delbet classification, 86 K Hip periprosthetic fractures, Kaplan classification, distal 90–92 phalanx fractures, 36 Cooke and Newman, 90–91 Knee dislocations, 56–61 Duncan and Masri descriptive classification, classification, 90 56–57 Johansson classification, pilon fracture, 60–61 90 tibial/fibular shaft, 59 Humeral diaphyseal fractures, tibial plateau fractures, 58 AO classification, 20–21 Knee periprosthetic fractures Humeral shaft, descriptive femoral, Lewis and classification, 18 Rorabeck classifiction, 92–93 I Neer classification, 92–93 Ideberg classification, intraarticular glenoid L fractures, 16–17 Lateral condylar physeal Inferior glenohumeral fractures, children, 81–82 dislocation, 18 Delee classification, 82 Intercondylar fractures, Milch classification, 81–82 Riseborough and Radin Wilkins and Beaty classification, 22 classification, 82 Intertrochanteric fractures, Lauge-Hansen classification, 46–47 ankle, 61–66 Boyd and Griffin Letts classification, radial classification, 46 head and neck fractures, Evans classification, 47 children, 84 Intraarticular fractures Levine and Edwards calcaneal fractures, 68–69 classification thumb, 35 atlas fractures, 1 Intraarticular glenoid traumatic spondylolisthesis fractures, Ideberg of axis, 3–4 classification, 16–17 Limb, lower. See Pelvis/lower limb J Limb, upper. See Shoulder/ Jahss classification, upper limb metatarsophalangeal Lisfranc joint. See joint, first, 78 Tarsometatarsal joint INDEX 101 Lunate fractures, Teisen and Monteggia fracture Hjarkbaek classification, Bado classification, 28–29 34 Letts classification, 84–85 Luxatio erecta, 18 Myerson classification, tarsometatarsal joint, 76 M Main and Jowell N classification, midtarsal Navicular fractures, 72–74 joint, 71–72 Eichenholtz and Levin Mallet fracture, Wehbe and classification, 72 Schnider classification, Sangeorzan classification, 36 72–74 Mason classification, radial Neer classification head, 26 knee fractures, McAfee classification, periprosthetic, 92–93 thoracolumbar spine proximal humerus, 18–19 fractures, 6 Medial condylar physeal O fractures, 82 Occipital condyle fractures, Metatarophalangeal joint, Anderson and Montisano first classification, 1 Bowers and Martin Odontoid process fractures, classification, 77 Anderson and D’Alonzo Jahss classification, 78 classification, 2–3 Metatarsal Olecranon, Morrey Bowers and Martin classification, 25 classification, 77–78 Orthopaedic Trauma dislocation, 78 Association classification fifth, Dameron cervical spine injuries, 6 classification, 77 cuboid fractures, 74 metatarophalangeal joint, 77–78 P tarsometatarsal joint, 75–77 Patellar fractures, 55–56 Meyers and McKeever descriptive classification, 55 classification, tibial spine, Saunders classification, children, 87 55–56 Midtarsal joint, Main and Pauwels classification, Jowell classification, femoral neck fractures, 71–72 44 Milch classification Pediatric fractures. See condylar fractures, 23 Children, fractures in lateral condylar physeal Pelvis, 37–39 fractures, children, acetabulum, 39 81–82 Tile classification, 38–39 102 INDEX Pelvis (cont.) Riseborough and Radin Young and Burgess classification, classification, 37–38 intercondylar fractures, Pelvis/lower limb 22 ankle, 61–67 Rockwood classification, foot, 67–78 acromioclavicular joint, hip dislocations, 40–54 12–14 knee dislocations, 56–61 Ruedi-Allgower classification, patellar fractures, 55–56 pilon fracture, 60 pelvis, 37–39 Russe classification, scaphoid Periprosthetic fractures fractures, 32 elbow, 95 Russel-Taylor classification, hip, 90–92 subtrochanteric fractures, knee, 92–93 51 shoulder, 94–95 tibia, 92 S Pilon fracture, Ruedi- Sacral fractures, Denis Allgower classification, classification, 10 60 Sanders classification, Pipkin subclassification, calcaneal fractures, 70–71 femoral head, 43 Sangeorzan classification, Posterior glenohumeral navicular fractures, dislocation, anatomic 72–74 classification, 18 Saunders classification, Proximal humerus, Neer patellar fractures, 55–56 classification, 18–19 Scaphoid fractures children, classification, Q 85 Quenu and Kuss Herbert and Fisher classification, classification, 32–33 tarsometatarsal joint, Russe classification, 32 75 Scapula, 15–23 anterior glenohumeral R dislocations, 16 Radial head, Mason condylar fractures, 23 classification, 26 coracoid fractures, 15–16 Radial head and neck distal humerus, 20 fractures, children, 83–85 humeral diaphyseal Letts classification, 84 fractures, 20–21 Wilkins classification, humeral shaft, 18 83–84 inferior glenohumeral Regan and Morrey dislocation, 18 classification, coronoid intercondylar fractures, process fracture, 25 22 INDEX 103 intraarticular glenoid Spine fractures, 16–17 atlantoaxial rotatory posterior glenohumeral subluxation and dislocation, 18 dislocation, 2 proximal humerus,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cohen2018.Pdf
    Influence of treatment modality on morbidity and mortality in periprosthetic femoral fracture. A comparative study of 71 fractures treated by internal fixation or femoral implant revision S. Cohen, X. Flecher, S. Parratte, M. Ollivier, Jean-Noël Argenson To cite this version: S. Cohen, X. Flecher, S. Parratte, M. Ollivier, Jean-Noël Argenson. Influence of treatment modality on morbidity and mortality in periprosthetic femoral fracture. A comparative study of 71 fractures treated by internal fixation or femoral implant revision. Orthopaedics and Traumatology -Surgery and Research, Elsevier, 2018, 104 (3), pp.363-367. 10.1016/j.otsr.2017.12.018. hal-01960509 HAL Id: hal-01960509 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01960509 Submitted on 22 Apr 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Original article Influence of treatment modality on morbidity and mortality in periprosthetic femoral fracture. A comparative study of 71 fractures treated by internal fixation or femoral implant revision. S. Cohena, X. Flechera,*, S. Parrattea, M. Olliviera,
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Society of Plastic Surgeons Société Canadienne Des Chirurgiens Plasticiens
    ABSTRACTS/RÉSUMÉS Canadian Society of Plastic Surgeons Société Canadienne des Chirurgiens Plasticiens Abstracts presented at the 69th Annual Meeting / 69e Réunion annuelle June 2 – 6, 2015, Victoria, British Columbia Dr Edward Tredget: President/Président Dr Howard Clarke: Vice President / Vice-président, Scientific Program Chair / Comité de programme scientifique Dr Chris Taylor: Local Organizing Committee Chair / Président, Comité d’accueil 02 EYE-OPENER SESSION FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES OF ENOPHTHALMOS 00 CORRECTION PELVIC, PERINEAL AND VAGINAL RECONSTRUCTION M McRae, A Budning, C Lynham, O Antonyshyn C Butler Toronto, ON University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, PURPOSE: Determine functional outcomes of late post-traumatic enoph- USA thalmos repair, specifically, ocular motility, diplopia, and strabismus. Learning Objectives: METHODS: The study series comprises 81 consecutive patients with late 1. Participants will recognize advantages and disadvantages of flap reconstruc- post-traumatic enophthalmos with functional impairment, that underwent tion of pelvic and perineal defects following abdominal perineal resection or enophthalmos repair by a single surgeon (OA) between May 2002 and pelvic exenteration. April 2014. Of those, 39 patients fulfilled study inclusion and exclusion 2. Participants will identify strategies to reconstruct the pelvic, perineal and vaginal criteria. Outcomes (diplopia, limitations of ocular motility, and strabismus) structures using flaps from various donor sites. were assessed independently by a single ophthalmologist who specializes in 3. Participants will understand the advantages and disadvantages of thigh-based strabismus surgery (AB), and were performed preop and postop for each and abdominal-based flaps for pelvic/perineal reconstruction. patient. Results: Average age was 43.1 (range 15-79) with 26 males, and 13 females.
    [Show full text]
  • Periprosthetic Fractures Around Loose Femoral Components
    Review Article Periprosthetic Fractures Around Loose Femoral Components Abstract Roshan P. Shah, MD, JD The development of periprosthetic fractures around loose femoral Neil P. Sheth, MD components can be a devastating event for patients who have undergone total hip arthroplasty (THA). As indications for THA expand Chancellor Gray, MD in an aging population and to use in younger patients, these fractures Hassan Alosh, MD are increasing in incidence. This review covers the epidemiology, risk Jonathan P. Garino, MD factors, prevention, and clinical management of periprosthetic femoral fractures. Treatment principles and reconstructive options are discussed, along with outcomes and complications. Femoral revision with a long-stem prosthesis or a modular tapered stem is the mainstay of treatment and has demonstrated good outcomes in the literature. Other reconstruction options are available, depending on bone From Columbia University, New York, quality. Surgeons must have a sound understanding of the diagnosis NY (Dr. Shah), the University of and treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures. Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA (Dr. Sheth, Dr. Gray, and Dr. Alosh), and the Pennsylvania Orthopedic Center, Alvern, PA (Dr. Garino). otal hip arthroplasty (THA) The incidence of periprosthetic hip Dr. Shah or an immediate family Treliably treats hip pain caused by fractures is increasing. Bhattacharyya member has stock or stock options articular cartilage degeneration; et al5 found a 216% increase between held in Pfizer, Merck, GlaxoSmithKline, Alnylam, and Intuitive Surgical. however, the development of peri- 2002 and 2006. Several reasons for Dr. Sheth or an immediate family prosthetic femoral fractures after the increase have been proposed.1,2 member serves as a paid consultant to THA is a devastating complication.
    [Show full text]
  • ANNUAL ACHIEVEMENTS REPORT 2017/18 the Office of Pediatric Surgical Evaluation and Innovation at BCCH
    ANNUAL ACHIEVEMENTS REPORT 2017/18 The Office of Pediatric Surgical Evaluation and Innovation at BCCH Partnership | Integrity | Curiosity | Enthusiasm | Achievement | Service THE OFFICE OF PEDIATRIC SURGICAL EVALUATION AND INNOVATION ANNUAL ACHIEVEMENTS REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS LETTER FROM THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR 4 REVIEW OF SSRP AND BCCHR RESEARCH AWARD FUNDING (2005-2018) 6 DEPARTMENT OF PEDIATRIC DENTISTRY 8 DEPARTMENT OF PEDIATRIC NEUROSURGERY 18 DEPARTMENT OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY 32 DEPARTMENT OF PEDIATRIC OTOLARYNGOLOGY 88 DIVISION OF PEDIATRIC PLASTIC SURGERY 100 DEPARTMENT OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY 104 DIVISION OF PEDIATRIC UROLOGY 120 DIVISION OF PEDIATRIC OPHTHALMOLOGY 130 PEDIATRIC DENTRISTRY DEPARTMENT OF PEDIATRIC DENTISTRY 2016-2018 FACULTY MEMBERS: Dr. Karen Campbell, Dr. Raymon Dr. Winnie Zhao Department Head Grewal, Division Head Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery Dr. Elsa Hui-Derksen Dr. WaSham Dr. Joy Richman, Cheung Professor UBC Dr. Rosamund Dr. Phoebe Tsang Dr. Kavita Mathu-Muju Harrison Dr. Jennifer Park Dr. Shan Sun Dr. Graham Grabowski Dr. Ben Kang Dr. Jason Choi 2016/18 PEDIATRIC DENTISTRY Dr. Ahmed Hieawy, Consulting Endodontist STAFF MEMBERS: Dr. Anuradha Korada, Consultant Pediatric dentist Dr. Martin Braverman, Consultant Oral and maxillofacial Dr. Angelina Loo, Consultant Orthodontist surgeon Dr. David MacDonald, Consultant Oral radiologist Dr. Mark Casafrancisco, Consultant Pediatric dentist Dr. Chris Olynik, Active Oral and maxillofacial surgeon Dr. Peter Chan, Consultant Pediatric dentist Dr. Benjamin Pliska, Consultant Orthodontist Dr. Kunal Chander, Consultant Pediatric dentist Dr. Paul Pocock, Consultant Orthodontist Dr. Jeff Coil, Active Endodontist Dr. Dorothy Sonya-Hoglund, Consultant Orthodontist and Oral Dr. Leo Fung, Consultant Prosthodontist radiologist Dr. Janice Garrett, Associate General dentist Dr. Priscilla Walsh, Consultant Periodontist Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Proximal Femoral Periprosthetic Fracture Fixation with a Hooked Locking Plate: a Kenyan Experience
    CASE REPORT East African Orthopaedic Journal PROXIMAL FEMORAL PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURE FIXATION WITH A HOOKED LOCKING PLATE: A KENYAN EXPERIENCE L.N. Gakuu, MBChB, MMed (Surg), FCS (ECSA), and A. A. Admani, MBChB, MMed, Resident, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, College of Health Sciences, University of Nairobi, P. O. Box 19676 – 00202, Nairobi, Kenya Correspondence to: Dr. A. A. Admani, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, College of Health Sciences, University of Nairobi, P. O. Box 19676 – 00202, Nairobi, Kenya. Email:[email protected] ABSTRACT The advent and increasing use of joint replacement for various pathologies has led to a new group of fractures- the periprosthetic fractures. The hip joint is no exception to this group, a fair share of these fractures do occur around the hip joint. The management of these fractures is complex and usually needs application of basic principles to fit an individual situation rather than having a fixed set of rules. In this article we discuss the use of a hooked locking plate in the management of one such fracture. CASE REPORT (ii) Debridement of the fracture edges. (iii) Removal of cement from the medullary canal E.M., a 70 year old lady presented to us on 25th distally. February 2011 with complains of severe right hip (iv) Trial of reduction. pain following a fall at home. She was unable to walk (v) Placement of freshly prepared cement into the and the pain was barely bearable even after taking canal distally. strong analgesics. She had undergone total hip (vi) Absolute reduction of the fracture and cerclage replacement in 2005 for severe osteoarthritis of the wiring at the level of the spiral fracture followed hip, but thereafter had no pain in the hip preceding by placement of a hook plate over the construct.
    [Show full text]
  • Posters, Which Were Displayed on All Orthopaedic Wards and Emailed Individually to All Orthopaedic Trainees and Consultants
    Abstract no.: 36413 PATHOLOGICAL INFLUENCES OF CONNECTIVE TISSUES DYSPLASTIC DISORDERS ON SURGICAL TREATMENT RESULTS OF PECTUS EXCAVATUM IN CHILDREN Iskandar KHODJANOV, Sherali KHAKIMOV, Khatam KASYMOV Scientific Research Institute Traumatology and Orthopedics, Tashkent city (UZBEKISTAN) Recently, several complications associating with the instability of the installed bar, PC deformity occurrence and the PE relapse have been occurred in more than 20% after surgery. Purpose was the determination of the role of the connective tissues dysplastic disorders for remodeling processes of the anterior chest wall in children with PE in post- operative periods. Investigation performed on 40 children, who underwent operative treatment by the D. Nuss procedure in Clinic of SRITO RUz, with PE. Genetic assessment was carried out by the T. Milkovska-Dmitrova and A. Karakeshev classification (1985). Good results were obtained in 35 cases in the nearest postoperative periods, 5 cases were with the severe pain and in long-term periods was occurred the PC deformity in 2 cases, secondary atypical deformation in 1, the relapse of PE till I degree in 1 and in 1 case was saved the neuralgic pain. The connective tissues dysplasia is a congenital character genesis, characterized by metabolic disorders in the stroma tissues and several enzymopathy. The osseo-cartilaginous structural system growth processes were not behavioral in the necessary age norm of locomotors apparatus and with the delaying of ossification processes also in the adolescent's age and the sterno-costal complex became most pliable. These changes complicated the correction method of PE, extended the period of immobilization. It is hard to determine the outcome operative results of the patients with severe degrees of conjunctive tissues dysplasia.
    [Show full text]
  • Periprosthetic Femoral Fracture After Total Hip Replacement
    Periprosthetic femoral fracture after total hip replacement Incidence, risk factors and treatment Georgios Chatziagorou Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg Gothenburg 2020 Periprosthetic femoral fracture after total hip replacement: incidence, risk factors and treatment. © Georgios Chatziagorou 2020 [email protected] The copyright of the contents of this thesis belongs to Georgios Chatziagorou. The published articles are reproduced with permission from the respective journals. Cover illustration by Pontus Andersson Layout by Nikolaos Vryniotis Printed in Borås, Sweden 2020 Printed by Stema Specialtryck AB ISBN 978-91-7833-778-1 (PRINT) ISBN 978-91-7833-997-8 (PDF) http://hdl.handle.net/2077/62689 «Μέτρον ἄριστον» “Lagom är bäst” (Moderation is best) Table of contents ABSTRACT .......................................................................................................... 9 SAMMANFATTNING (SUMMARY IN SWEDISH) .................................. 13 LIST OF PAPERS ............................................................................................... 17 ABBREVIATIONS .............................................................................................. 19 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................ 23 2. BACKGROUND ............................................................................................. 25 2.1 TYPES OF TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENT.........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Thesis Reference
    Thesis Classification des fractures des os longs : concepts et utilité ROD FLEURY, Thierry Abstract Le traitement des fractures des os longs fait partie intégrante des tâches quotidiennes d'un service d'orthopédie et peut représenter une part importante de son activité. Le choix de la stratégie thérapeutique est influencé par de nombreux facteurs plus ou moins objectifs allant de l'expérience de l'opérateur aux recommandations basées sur des preuves scientifiques, en incluant des facteurs liés au patient et aux ressources du service. Cependant, la décision part toujours initialement de la fracture, qui est décrite, puis catégorisée et incluse dans une classification. L'objectif de ce travail est de développer le concept de classification des fractures en soi, d'en identifier les caractéristiques, l'utilité et les limitations, et d'évoquer les pistes de développements futurs qui devraient permettre d'améliorer la prise en charge des patients victimes de fracture. Reference ROD FLEURY, Thierry. Classification des fractures des os longs : concepts et utilité. Thèse de doctorat : Univ. Genève, 2016, no. Méd. 10823 URN : urn:nbn:ch:unige-895791 DOI : 10.13097/archive-ouverte/unige:89579 Available at: http://archive-ouverte.unige.ch/unige:89579 Disclaimer: layout of this document may differ from the published version. 1 / 1 Thèse de Doctorat en Médecine Thierry Rod Fleury Sous la supervision du Professeur Pierre J. Hoffmeyer Service d’orthopédie et traumatologie de l’appareil locomoteur, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève Classification des fractures des os longs Concepts et utilité 1 Table des matières Introduction et Résumé .............................................................................................................. 3 Classification of long bone fractures .......................................................................................... 9 Introduction ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Clinical and Biomechanical Assessment of the Treatment of Type B Periprosthetic Fractures of the Femur
    Clinical and Biomechanical Assessment of the Treatment of Type B Periprosthetic Fractures of the Femur Fares S Haddad University College Hospital University College London April 2012 This dissertation is submitted for the degree of Doctor of Medicine at University College London Declaration I hereby declare that this dissertation is the result of my own work and includes nothing which is the outcome of work done in collaboration except where is specifically indicated in the text and bibliography and that my thesis is not substantially the same as any that I have submitted for a degree of diploma or other qualification at any other University. In addition, this dissertation falls within the word limit of exclusive of tables, footnotes, bibliography, and appendices, as set by the University College London. Fares S Haddad 1 | P a g e Abstract Total hip arthroplasty is a well established treatment modality for the diseased hip. The number implanted rises annually on a global scale which is mirrored by increasing indications. After aseptic loosening and infection, periprosthetic fracture remains one of the commonest complications of this otherwise successful surgery. Management is geared towards restoring function through fixation of the fracture. The general aim of this thesis is to validate the classification of periprosthetic fractures of the femur around total hip arthroplasty, provide evidence towards the outcomes of methods of fixation of these fractures, and present supplementary biomechanical data regarding fixation and implant stress. It is hypothesised that the Vancouver classification will be a reliable and reproducible system to use, that strut grafts, cables and long-stemmed implants will improve function and outcome when used to manage these injuries, and that biomechanical models will provide evidence on why the use of the implants is successful.
    [Show full text]
  • Thieme Advance Information February 2014 – April 2014
    Thieme Advance Information February 2014 – April 2014 Table of Contents New Titles Audiology Fitpatrick: Pediatric Audiologic Rehabilitation, From Infancy to Adolescence Complementary Medicine Kersschot: Biopuncture Internal Medicine Zeller: Vascular Medicine Neurosurgery Nader: Neurosurgery Tricks of the Trade: Spine and Peripheral Nerves Nowinski: The Human Brain in 1969 Pieces 2.0, Structure, Vasculature, Tracts, Cranial Nerves, Systems, Head Muscles, and Tracts Ophthalmology Kuchenbecker: Plates for Color Vision Testing Orthopedics Schuetz: Periprosthetic Fracture Management Otolaryngology Bhattacharyya: Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery Series: Laryngology Devaiah: Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery Series: Rhinology and Endoscopic Skull Base Surgery Fried: Clinical Laryngology, The Essentials Philpott: Key Revision for Otolaryngology, Postgraduate and Exit Exam Preparation Plastic Surgery Herman: Encyclopedia of Aesthetic Rejuvenation Through Volume Enhancement 5 Thieme ABI 1-2014 Titles already announced in previous Advance Infomations Thieme Chemistry Thieme Core Titles List Order Form with Barcodes Promotional Material Order Form Promotional Material Information Contact Information General Information Thieme Publishers Stuttgart Fax ++49-711-8931-323 e-mail: [email protected] 6 Thieme ABI 1-2014 TITLE Pediatric Audiologic Rehabilitation From Infancy to Adolescence PRICE €64.99 ISBN 9781604066951 PUB. DATE April 2014 FORMAT HARDBACK · 24 illustrations · 240 pages · 178 x 254 mm SPECIALTY Audiology; Speech Language Pathology LEVEL Students EDITORS Elizabeth Fitzpatrick, MD Suzanne P. Doucet, Me.D Audiology & Speech-Language Pathology Moncton University Program Moncton, NB, Canada Faculty of Health Sciences University of Ottowa Ottawa, ON, Canada DESCRIPTION Pediatric Audiologic Rehabilitation presents evidence-based information on the clinical and educational management of children with hearing loss who are learning spoken language from infancy through adolescence.
    [Show full text]
  • Diagnosis and Management of Intraoperative Fractures in Primary
    Review Article Diagnosis and Management of Intraoperative Fractures in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty 01/21/2021 on k38zdtHxkv6vYCpY6eTuHAvjaBKfkiBvTDlT9UnCurpiFF0LpmGCRtZciWbnx/5o97dLVS/w6H4UBNoIdbWSMFPfrDRrgELMxjRi3nLPvlA5oKaJ+Q9/ELdcC+W3OaGdzSaoRM9vgAY= by http://journals.lww.com/jaaos from Downloaded Downloaded Ahmed Siddiqi, DO, MBA from Bryan D. Springer, MD http://journals.lww.com/jaaos ABSTRACT Antonia F. Chen, MD, MBA Nicolas S. Piuzzi, MD Intraoperative periprosthetic fractures are challenging complications that may affect implant stability and survivorship. Periprosthetic by k38zdtHxkv6vYCpY6eTuHAvjaBKfkiBvTDlT9UnCurpiFF0LpmGCRtZciWbnx/5o97dLVS/w6H4UBNoIdbWSMFPfrDRrgELMxjRi3nLPvlA5oKaJ+Q9/ELdcC+W3OaGdzSaoRM9vgAY= acetabular fractures are uncommon and infrequently are the focus of studies. Acetabular fractures are occasionally recognized after patients report unremitting groin pain weeks postoperatively. The widespread use of cementless acetabular cups might lead to higher number of fractures than is clinically detectable. Conversely, the incidence of intraoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures are more common and From the Department of Orthopedics, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH (Siddiqi, encompass a broad spectrum, ranging from a small cortical perforation Piuzzi), the Department of Orthopedics Atrium, to displaced fractures with an unstable prosthesis. Appropriate OrthoCarolina Hip and Knee Center, Musculoskeletal Institute, Charlotte, NC recognition, including mindfulness of preoperative patient and surgical
    [Show full text]
  • Early Definitive Fixation of an Open Periprosthetic
    Case Report Journal of Orthopaedic Case Reports 2016 Jan-Mar: 6(1):Page 33-36 Early Definitive Fixation of an Open Periprosthetic Femur Fracture in the Polytraumatized Patient: A Case Report and Review of the Literature Ilyas S Aleem¹, Mohit Bhandari¹, Sebastian Rodriguez Elizalde² What to Learn from this Article? Periprosthetic fractures of the femur after total hip arthroplasty are increasing in frequency and ongoing debate exists regarding early definitive stabilization versus initial damage control orthopaedics followed by delayed fixation. Early definitive stabilization versus delayed fixation in the polytraumatized patient with an open periprosthetic femur fracture is reviewed in the context of a case study. Abstract Introduction: Periprosthetic fractures of the femur after total hip arthroplasty are increasing in frequency. In the polytraumatized patient with long-bone fracture, an ongoing debate exists regarding early definitive stabilization versus initial damage control orthopaedics, followed by delayed fixation. It remains to be seen whether this rationale applies to the polytraumatized patient with periprosthetic fracture. Case presentation: We present the case of a 73-years old Caucasian woman who sustained bilateral Gustillo-Anderson grade III open femur fractures; the fracture on the right was a Vancouver C open periprosthetic fracture after cemented total hip arthroplasty. After massive fluid resuscitation in the trauma bay she was taken to the intensive care unit in a hemodynamically unstable condition. She was subsequently operated and underwent early definitive fixation of both femurs with the rationale of potentially reducing pulmonary complications and promoting early mobilization. Conclusion: Early definitive stabilization versus delayed fixation in the polytraumatized patient with an open periprosthetic femur fracture is reviewed.
    [Show full text]