DOCSLIB.ORG

A AAOS Classification, of Acetabular Bone Defects, 2557–2559

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A AAOS Classification, of Acetabular Bone Defects, 2557–2559 Index A morsellized and structural bone grafts, 2574–2575 AAOS classification, of acetabular bone defects, operative technique, 2575–2576 2557–2559 posterolateral approach, 2575 Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) score, 100, 101 post-operative care, 2577 ABC. See Aneurysmal bone cyst (ABC) results, 2577, 2579 Abduction small fragment grafts, 2575 bracing, 4455 Acetabular rim syndrome, 2345 deformity, midfoot, 3549 Acetabuloplasty, 4602–4603. See also Shelf Abductor pollicis brevis (APB) acetabuloplasty median nerve lesions, 1585, 1586 Acetabulum median nerve palsy, 1587 bone metastases, 4303–4304 Abnormal parabola, metatarsalgia, 3529–3531 cementing process, 2408–2410 Acetabular bone defects component insertion, 2410 AAOS classification, 2557–2559 hip, 2347 CT scans, 2557 reaming, 2405 dislocation, prevention of, 2568–2569 rim preparation, 2406–2407 Paprosky classification, 2557, 2559, 2560 sucker aspirator device, 2407–2408 radiographic criteria, 2557 surface area, 2405–2406 reconstruction of, 2566, 2568 Acetabulum, aseptic loosening of THR Acetabular fractures aetiology and pathology, 2554–2555 aetiology, 2270–2271 anterolateral approach and implant removal, 2562–2563 in children, incomplete fractures, 4802 antibiotics, 2561–2562 classification of, 2270–2271 bone defects (see Acetabular bone defects) of columns, 2278–2279, 2288 complications, 2570 computerized axial tomography, 2285–2297 defect-specific reconstruction, 2564 disabling sequelae, 2313–2316 diagnosis of, 2555 in horizontal plane, 2275–2278, 2282–2288 goals, for hip reconstruction, 2560 ileo-inguinal approach, 2300–2306 isolated acetabular revision, 2558–2560 inveterate fractures, 2310–2313 post-operative care and rehabilitation, 2570 Iselin’s posterior approach, 2298–2297 pre-operative work-up, for infection, 2556 post-operative care and rehabilitation, 2306 radiographic criteria for, 2555 post-operative complications, 2307–2310 radiolucent lines, 2555 pre-operative planning and preparation, 2297–2298 revision implants, 2563–2564 principles of, 2270 surgical indications, 2555–2556 radiology, 2280–2285, 2289 surgical risk factors, 2560 surgical indications, 2297 type-I defect reconstruction, 2564 in vertical plane, 2271–2275, 2279, 2281 type-II defect reconstruction, 2564 Acetabular labrum, 2151 type-III defect reconstruction, 2564 Acetabular lip, 2270 type-IV defect reconstruction, 2564–2568 Acetabular revision total hip arthroplasty Acetabulum, hip replacement acetabular reconstruction, 2574, 2577–2580 anatomy, 2441–2442 combined cavitary segmental defect, 2574 bone grafting, 2445–2446 complications, 2579, 2581 CT scanning, 2442 graft preparation, 2576–2578 fixation of, 2444–2445 indication for, 2575 positioning of, 2443–2444 large fragment grafts, 2575 pre-operative planning, 2442–2443 G. Bentley (ed.), European Surgical Orthopaedics and Traumatology, 4897 DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-34746-7, # EFORT 2014 4898 Index Achilles reinforcement, 3896–3897 augmented, 3869 Achilles tendinopathy biomechanics, 3861 calcaneus fractures, 3821, 3823 classical open technique, 3866–3868 diagnosis, 3886 complications, 3870–3872 insertion (see Insertion tendinopathy) epidemiology, 3860 tendon body pathology (see Tendon body pathology) mini-open, 3868 Achilles tendon allograft, PCL reconstruction open repair, 3865–3866 femoral tunnel, 3055–3056 percutaneous, 3867–3868 fixation, 3058 post-operative care and rehabilitation, 3869–3870 graft preparation, 3054–3055 presentation and diagnosis, 3861–3863 operating set-up, 3055 treatment, 3863–3865 patient position, 3054, 3055 Acute acromioclavicular-joint displacement. See also tibial tunnel, 3056–3058 Acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) injuries Achilles tendon chronic rupture deck-chair position, 1027 aetiology, 3876 deltotrapezius muscle fascia, 1029 allograft, 3885 K-wire placement, 1027, 1028, 1030 artificial materials, 3883 strap incision, 1028 diagnosis, 3876 Acute carpal tunnel syndrome, 1572 fascia lata, 3885 Acute charcot foot, 3943, 3945 free flap, 3885 Acute haematogenous osteomyelitis (AHO). indications, 3885–3886 See Osteomyelitis tendon augmentation, 3877–3882 Acute haematogenous periprosthetic infection, tendon transfer, 3881–3883 2513–2514 treatment indications, 3876 Acute lateral ankle ligament injury Achillon® mini-open technique, 3869 diagnosis, 3682–3683 Achondroplasia, 1671 management of, 3683 crossed lengthening, 4351 Acute lengthening procedure, brachymetatarsia, Acquired varus deformity, 4372 3531–3532 Acromial fractures, classification of, 949, 951 complications and salvage, 3532 Acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) injuries post-operative care and rehabilitation, 3532 acute, surgical treatment, 1027–1029 Acute ligament injuries, 1387–1388 aetiology, 1020–1021 Acute ligament injuries, knee anatomy, 848–849, 1020 ACL and MCL injuries, 2955–2956 chronic, surgical treatment, 1029–1031 anatomy and biomechanics, 2950 classification, 1021–1023 anterior cruciate ligament tears, 2955 complications, 1033–1035 history, 2951–2952 diagnosis, 1023–1024 imaging, 2953–2954 management, 1024–1026 locked knee, 2953 operative techniques, 1026–1028 management, 2954 outcome, 1032 medial collateral ligament sprains, 2954 paediatric sports injuries, 4858 multiple ligament injury, 2956 post-operative care and rehabilitation, 1032 PCL tears, 2956 pre-operative preparation and planning, 1026 physical examination, 2952–2953 surgical indications, 1025–1026 Acute low back pain. See also Low back pain surgilig ligament, 1031–1032 clinical recommendations, 779, 780 tumefaction, 1019 Acute-on-chronic SCFE treatment, 4429–4430 Acromio-humeral plate, shoulder arthrodesis, 1210 Acute-on-chronic slip, 4427 Acromion fractures Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation classification scheme of, 961 (APACHE), 100 operative technique, 962 Acute post-operative periprosthetic infection, 2513 post-operative, 1118 Acute SCFE treatment, 4429 surgical indications, 956 Acute slips, 4426 Acromionisers, 2159 Acute tarsometatarsal dislocation, diabetic foot, Active plantar flexion, 3861 3947, 3950 Acupass® Ap, 2902 Adamantinoma, 4116–4117 Acute Achilles tendon repair Adducto-equino-varus foot treatment, naviculectomy, Achillon® mini-open technique, 3869 4543, 4547 aetiology, 3861 Adhesiolysis, 1347 anatomy and pathology, 3860 Adhesion formation, in flexor tendon injuries, 1965 Index 4899 Adipose flap bulk protection, nerve pain, 1944, 1946–1947 Allograft techniques, for diaphyseal reconstruction, Adjacent level disease, 414–415 4244–4245 Adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) Alumina ceramics, total hip replacement ASDeg and ASDis lumbar fusion, 589–590 alumina/alumina bearings, revision of, 2468–2469 definition, 589 biological tolerance, 2462, 2463 lumbar disc arthroplasty, 590–592 brittleness, 2463 safety of spinal fusion and lumbar disc clinical experience, 2463–2464 replacement, 592 clinical outcome, 2464–2466 Adolescent tibia vara, 4379 complications of, 2466–2468 femoral deformity, 4382 friction characteristics, 2462–2463 hemi-epiphysiodesis, 4380–4382 surgical guidelines, 2470 tibia varus and torsion, 4382 vs. zirconia, physical properties of, 2462, 2643 AER. See Apical ectodermal ridge (AER) AMBRI classification systems, 1138 Agility® Ankle, 3707, 3722 AMBRII classification systems, 1164 Aging Ambulant child characteristics, 786 ankle plantar flexor lengthening, 4594–4595, higher probability of disintegration, 786–787 4598, 4599 I.V. disc degeneration, 786–788 calcaneal lengthening, 4587, 4588, 4592 spinal infections, 796–797 distal anterior femoral epiphyseodesis, 4587, typical disorders, 788–796 4589–4590 Akin osteotomy distal femoral extension osteotomy, 4583–4587 modified technique, 3412, 3414 distal hamstring lengthening, 4592, 4594, 4597 MTPJ, 3462 equinovarus foot deformity, 4595–4596 post-operative radiograph, 3412 first metatarsal extension osteotomy, 4590–4591, 4595 Allen test, 192, 193 medial displacement calcaneal osteotomy, Allgo¨wer suture technique, distal tibia fractures, 3783, 4588–4590, 4593 3784 patellar advancement, 4584, 4588 Allograft-prosthetic composites (APC), 2929–2930, 2934 proximal femoral de-rotation osteotomy, 4583–4585 femoral, 2930–2931 psoas lengthening, 4591–4592, 4596 tibial, 2930 tibial de-rotation osteotomy, 4857, 4591 Allografts tibialis anterior split transfer, 4597 Achilles tendon chronic rupture, 3885 tibialis posterior recession, 4596–4597, 4600 ACL repair, failure of, 3124–3126 valgus foot deformity, stabilisation of, 4587–4594 knee, 4228 Amelanotic melanomas, 1838–1839 limb salvage, 4237 American College of Surgeons (ACS), 99 meniscal allograft (see Meniscal allograft American Knee Society Score (AKSS) score, 3381 transplantation) American Spine Injury Association (ASIA) classification, open fractures, allogenic bone grafts, 217 700–701, 745, 746 osteoarticular, 4234 Amniotic band syndrome, 4516 peroneal tendon disorders, 3650 Amplitude of displacement, 141 UOA (see Unicondylar osteo-articular allografts Amputations (UOA)) arterial disease, 376 Allografts, bone loss in knee Boyd amputation, 388–389 aetiology, 2926, 2927 circular open, 381–382 anatomy and basic science, 2926 diabetic foot, 376, 3939, 3941 APC (see Allograft-prosthetic composites (APC)) disarticulation, at hip, 399–401 classification, 2926, 2927 disarticulation, at knee, 392–394 complications, 2933 Gritti-Stokes, 394–397 CT scan, 2932 indications, 376 diagnosis of, 2927 infection, 377 extensor mechanism allografts, 2931–2932 knee, 4228 indications, 2927 pain, 377 operative technique, 2928 periprosthetic infection, 2521–2522 post-operative care and rehabilitation, 2932–2933 post-operative
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Transolecranon Distal Humerus Fractures: a Mini Review
    Patel SS, Gatta J, Lee A, Bafus BT. Transolecranon Distal Humerus Fractures: A Mini Review. J Orthopedics & Orthopedic Surg. 2021;2(1):7-12 Mini Review Open Access Transolecranon Distal Humerus Fractures: A Mini Review Shaan S. Patel*, Julian Gatta, Adrienne Lee, Blaine T. Bafus Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA Article Info Abstract Article Notes Background: Transolecranon distal humerus fractures are uncommon Received: March 13, 2021 injuries. The purpose of this study is to review the outcomes and complications Accepted: April 22, 2021 associated with transolecranon distal humerus fractures. *Correspondence: Material and Methods: We performed a systematic search of PubMed *Dr. Shaan S. Patel, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, for articles published between 1990 and 2021. Included studies reported MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA; Telephone No: (205) 495-0460; Email: [email protected]. outcomes and complications of transolecranon distal humerus fractures. Data was extracted from the included studies to describe patient demographics, ©2021 Patel SS. This article is distributed under the terms of the injury characteristics, outcome measurements, and complications. Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Results: A total of 4 studies met inclusion criteria for data extraction and Keywords analysis. Two studies evaluated an adult cohort of a total of 18 patients. The Transolecranon average Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score was 40 (range Olecranon 4.2 – 76.5). Fifteen patients (83%) had a complication. Elbow stiffness (11/18, Distal humerus 61%) was the most common complication. Eleven patients (61%) underwent Fracture Outcomes more than one procedure. Two studies evaluated a pediatric cohort of a total Complications of 9 patients.
    [Show full text]
  • Clinical Practice Guideline for Limb Salvage Or Early Amputation
    Limb Salvage or Early Amputation Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline Adopted by: The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Board of Directors December 6, 2019 Endorsed by: Please cite this guideline as: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Limb Salvage or Early Amputation Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline. https://www.aaos.org/globalassets/quality-and-practice-resources/dod/ lsa-cpg-final-draft-12-10-19.pdf Published December 6, 2019 View background material via the LSA CPG eAppendix Disclaimer This clinical practice guideline was developed by a physician volunteer clinical practice guideline development group based on a formal systematic review of the available scientific and clinical information and accepted approaches to treatment and/or diagnosis. This clinical practice guideline is not intended to be a fixed protocol, as some patients may require more or less treatment or different means of diagnosis. Clinical patients may not necessarily be the same as those found in a clinical trial. Patient care and treatment should always be based on a clinician’s independent medical judgment, given the individual patient’s specific clinical circumstances. Disclosure Requirement In accordance with AAOS policy, all individuals whose names appear as authors or contributors to this clinical practice guideline filed a disclosure statement as part of the submission process. All panel members provided full disclosure of potential conflicts of interest prior to voting on the recommendations contained within this clinical practice guideline. Funding Source This clinical practice guideline was funded exclusively through a research grant provided by the United States Department of Defense with no funding from outside commercial sources to support the development of this document.
    [Show full text]
  • Cohen2018.Pdf
    Influence of treatment modality on morbidity and mortality in periprosthetic femoral fracture. A comparative study of 71 fractures treated by internal fixation or femoral implant revision S. Cohen, X. Flecher, S. Parratte, M. Ollivier, Jean-Noël Argenson To cite this version: S. Cohen, X. Flecher, S. Parratte, M. Ollivier, Jean-Noël Argenson. Influence of treatment modality on morbidity and mortality in periprosthetic femoral fracture. A comparative study of 71 fractures treated by internal fixation or femoral implant revision. Orthopaedics and Traumatology -Surgery and Research, Elsevier, 2018, 104 (3), pp.363-367. 10.1016/j.otsr.2017.12.018. hal-01960509 HAL Id: hal-01960509 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01960509 Submitted on 22 Apr 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Original article Influence of treatment modality on morbidity and mortality in periprosthetic femoral fracture. A comparative study of 71 fractures treated by internal fixation or femoral implant revision. S. Cohena, X. Flechera,*, S. Parrattea, M. Olliviera,
    [Show full text]
  • Downloads As of 6/2011.) 2
    CURRICULUM VITAE Michael J. Prayson, MD Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sports Medicine & Rehabilitation Wright State University Boonshoft School of Medicine 30 E. Apple Street, Suite 2200 Dayton, Ohio 45409 937-208-2128 937-208-2920 Fax EDUCATION Institution Concentration Degree/Date Kent State University & Combined 6-Year Program BS/MD 1989 Northeastern Ohio Universities College of Medicine Rootstown, Ohio POST GRADUATE EDUCATION Item Date Orthopaedic Surgery Internship & Residency Training 1989-1994 Akron General Medical Center, Akron, Ohio Orthopaedic Traumatology Fellowship 1994-1995 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania ACADEMIC EXPERIENCE Institution Position Date Northeastern Ohio Universities College of Medicine Clinical Instructor 1993-1994 Rootstown, Ohio University of Missouri Assistant Professor 1995-1998 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery Kansas City, Missouri Akron General Medical Center Assistant Professor 1998-1999 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery Akron, Ohio University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Assistant Professor 1999-2004 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Wright State University Boonshoft School of Medicine Associate Professor 2004-2009 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Director of Orthopaedic Sports Medicine & Rehabilitation Undergraduate Education 2004-2006 Dayton, Ohio Trauma Fellowship Director 2006-Present Director of Orthopaedic Trauma 2004-Present Section Chair of Orthopaedic Trauma 2008-2010 Vice Chairman 2008-Present
    [Show full text]
  • Orthopaedics Essentials
    Frykman Classification of Distal Fracture of base of the first Neer classification of proximal humeral head # Radial # metacarpal bone 1-part 2-part 3-part 4-part GT GT+SN “CLASSIC” SN LT+SN (RARE) “VALGUS IMPACTED” Galeazzi Fracture LN (RARE) Impression # Head split Gartland’s classification of supracondylar Fracture shaft of ulnar, together with distal third of radius with fracture of humerus disruption of the proximal radioulnar dislocation or subluxation of distal joint and dislocation of radiocapitallar radio-ulnar joint joint Salter–Harris fracture = Fracture that involves the epiphyseal plate or growth plate of a bone Type I: undisplaced or minimally displaced fractures. Type II: displaced with posterior cortex intact Type III: displaced with no cortical intact Gustillo Anderson Classification of Open Fracture I – open fracture with a wound <1cm and clean II – open fracture with wound > 1cm with extensive soft tissue damage and avulsion of flaps IIIa – open fracture with adequate soft tissue coverage of bone in • Galeazzi fracture - a fracture of the radius spite of extensive soft tissue laceration or flaps or high energy with dislocation of the distal radioulnar joint trauma irrespective of size of wound • Colles' fracture - a distal fracture of the IIIb – open fracture with extensive soft tissue loss, periosteal radius with dorsal (posterior) displacement of the wrist and hand stripping and exposure of bone • Smith's fracture - a distal fracture of the IIIc – open fracture associated with an arterial injury which requires radius with volar (ventral) displacement of the I II IIIa IIIb IIIc repair wrist and hand • Barton's fracture - an intra-articular fracture of the distal radius with dislocation of Irrigation: 3L 6L 9L ORTHOPAEDICS CLASSIFICATION the radiocarpal joint • Essex-Lopresti fracture - a fracture of PART 1 (UPPER LIMB) the radial head with concomitant dislocation HTARW5B/GKS2013/3- of the distal radio-ulnar joint with disruption of Together In Delivering Excellence (T.I.D.E.) the interosseous membrane Contributors: Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Society of Plastic Surgeons Société Canadienne Des Chirurgiens Plasticiens
    ABSTRACTS/RÉSUMÉS Canadian Society of Plastic Surgeons Société Canadienne des Chirurgiens Plasticiens Abstracts presented at the 69th Annual Meeting / 69e Réunion annuelle June 2 – 6, 2015, Victoria, British Columbia Dr Edward Tredget: President/Président Dr Howard Clarke: Vice President / Vice-président, Scientific Program Chair / Comité de programme scientifique Dr Chris Taylor: Local Organizing Committee Chair / Président, Comité d’accueil 02 EYE-OPENER SESSION FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES OF ENOPHTHALMOS 00 CORRECTION PELVIC, PERINEAL AND VAGINAL RECONSTRUCTION M McRae, A Budning, C Lynham, O Antonyshyn C Butler Toronto, ON University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, PURPOSE: Determine functional outcomes of late post-traumatic enoph- USA thalmos repair, specifically, ocular motility, diplopia, and strabismus. Learning Objectives: METHODS: The study series comprises 81 consecutive patients with late 1. Participants will recognize advantages and disadvantages of flap reconstruc- post-traumatic enophthalmos with functional impairment, that underwent tion of pelvic and perineal defects following abdominal perineal resection or enophthalmos repair by a single surgeon (OA) between May 2002 and pelvic exenteration. April 2014. Of those, 39 patients fulfilled study inclusion and exclusion 2. Participants will identify strategies to reconstruct the pelvic, perineal and vaginal criteria. Outcomes (diplopia, limitations of ocular motility, and strabismus) structures using flaps from various donor sites. were assessed independently by a single ophthalmologist who specializes in 3. Participants will understand the advantages and disadvantages of thigh-based strabismus surgery (AB), and were performed preop and postop for each and abdominal-based flaps for pelvic/perineal reconstruction. patient. Results: Average age was 43.1 (range 15-79) with 26 males, and 13 females.
    [Show full text]
  • Policy on Infant Hip Screening
    Policy on Infant Hip Screening COMMITTEE ON CHIROPRACTIC PAEDIATRIC DIAGNOSTIC AND THERAPEUTIC PROCEDURES January 2020 Note: This policy is relevant to infant ages only. A policy on hip screening in the post-infantile paediatric patient will be covered separately. BACKGROUND Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is one of the most common musculoskeletal conditions of infancy.1 DDH is the result of abnormal relationship between the femoral head and the acetabulum. It can range in severity from instability to dislocation (requiring surgical intervention), with varying degrees of acetabular dysplasia in between.2–4 In Australia, there is a reported incidence of seven per 1000 live births.5 The incidence of late- detection (clinically detected DDH after 3 months of age) and diagnosis has increased from 0.22 per 1000 live births in 1988-2003 to 0.7 per 1000 in 2003-2009.6,7 SCREENING In Australia, it is recommended that General Practitioners (GP) and Maternal and Child Health Nurses (MCHN) screen for DDH by performing Ortolani, Barlow, Abduction and Allis tests, as well as observing for leg length and thigh crease asymmetry.8–11 This follows guidelines established by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.12 Regular screening is important as early detection of DDH has better outcomes and requires less aggressive management with reduced risks: bracing and non-surgical intervention compared to potential surgical intervention for those older than 6 months of age.5 Clinical hip examination by the infants’ GP and MCHN remains the primary
    [Show full text]
  • Techniques in Hand & Upper Extremity Surgery
    Open Journal of Orthopedics, 2016, 6, 321-325 http://www.scirp.org/journal/ojo ISSN Online: 2164-3016 ISSN Print: 2164-3008 Techniques in Hand & Upper Extremity Surgery Anna De Leo, Billy Ching Leung*, Henk Giele Department of Plastic Surgery, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospital NHS Trust, Oxford, UK How to cite this paper: De Leo, A., Leung, Abstract B.C. and Giele, H. (2016) Techniques in Hand & Upper Extremity Surgery. Open The use of tendon transfer to restore functions of extremities was initially recognised Journal of Orthopedics, 6, 321-325. in the 19th century, and its advancement was further amplified by the polio epidemic http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ojo.2016.610042 towards the turn of that century. Tendon transfer surgery extended to the use for Received: August 18, 2016 traumatic reconstructive surgery during World War I, with key surgical pioneers, in- Accepted: October 16, 2016 cluding Mayer, Sterling Bunnell, Guy Pulvertaft and Joseph Boyes. In 1921, Robert Published: October 19, 2016 Jones first described the transfer of pronator teres (PT) to the wrist extensors for ir- reparable radial nerve paralysis in infantile hemiplegia. Although, a detailed descrip- Copyright © 2016 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. tion of its indication and surgical outcomes were not published until 1959 and 1970 This work is licensed under the Creative by Stelling and Meyer, and Keats, respectively. Pronator teres is often the tendon of Commons Attribution International choice for reconstructing wrist extensors, and used in a multiple of pathologies, in- License (CC BY 4.0). cluding radial nerve palsy, cerebral palsy, and tetraplegia.
    [Show full text]
  • Non-Cardiac Manifestations of Marfan Syndrome
    Keynote Lecture Series Non-cardiac manifestations of Marfan syndrome Anne H. Child Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute, St George’s University of London, Cranmer Terrace, London, UK Correspondence to: Dr. Anne H. Child, MD, FRCP. Reader in Cardiovascular Genetics, Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute, St George's University of London, Cranmer Terrace, London SW17 0RE, UK. Email: [email protected]. Because of the widespread distribution of fibrillin 1 in the body, Marfan syndrome (MFS) affects virtually every system. The expression of this single dominantly inherited gene is variable within a family, and between families. There is some genotype-phenotype correlation which is helpful in guiding long-term prognosis, and management. In general gene mutations have been reported in clusters, with those having mainly ocular manifestations occurring in exons 1 to 15 of this 65-exon gene; those causing cardiac problems often involving cysteine replacement in a calcium binding EGF-like sequence; the most severe mutations occurring in exons 25–32, causing neonatal MFS diagnosed at birth, and severe enough to cause death frequently before the age of 2. Other correlations will certainly be found in future. This condition is progressive, and the manifestations unfold according to age. For example, if the lens is going to dislocate this usually occurs by age 10; scoliosis usually presents itself between the ages of 8 and 15; height should be monitored carefully between the onset of puberty and cessation of growth approximately age 17 or 18. Holistic care should be offered by one doctor who oversees the patient’s welfare. This should be a paediatrician, paediatric cardiologist, or general practitioner in the case of an affected child.
    [Show full text]
  • ICD~10~PCS Complete Code Set Procedural Coding System Sample
    ICD~10~PCS Complete Code Set Procedural Coding System Sample Table.of.Contents Preface....................................................................................00 Mouth and Throat ............................................................................. 00 Introducton...........................................................................00 Gastrointestinal System .................................................................. 00 Hepatobiliary System and Pancreas ........................................... 00 What is ICD-10-PCS? ........................................................................ 00 Endocrine System ............................................................................. 00 ICD-10-PCS Code Structure ........................................................... 00 Skin and Breast .................................................................................. 00 ICD-10-PCS Design ........................................................................... 00 Subcutaneous Tissue and Fascia ................................................. 00 ICD-10-PCS Additional Characteristics ...................................... 00 Muscles ................................................................................................. 00 ICD-10-PCS Applications ................................................................ 00 Tendons ................................................................................................ 00 Understandng.Root.Operatons..........................................00
    [Show full text]
  • Patient Guide for a Hip Replacement
    Day of surgery: ____________________ Expected discharge home: ____________________ Surgeon: ____________________ Phone number: ____________________ Bring this guide with you to the hospital on the day of your surgery 4100492 (17-10) 2 Introduction This information guide will help you understand what is involved in hip arthroplasty (hip replacement). We hope the information in this booklet will help you prepare for your surgery •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• About Hôpital Montfort Hôpital Montfort is a Francophone academic health care institution that provides quality care in both official languages and works with its partners to improve the health of communities. Montfort strives for excellence and wants to be a hospital of choice for its personalized patient care, its workplace, teaching and research. Our daily actions are guided by the values of compassion, commitment, excellence and respect. WARNING This guide does not replace the advice of your care provider. Please consult your care provider to assess if the information presented in this guide applies to your situation. The content of this guide was prepared by Vancouver Coastal Health and adapted by Hôpital Montfort. 3 Your Health Care: Be Involved! • Be involved in your health care. Speak up if you have questions or concerns about your care. • Tell a member of your health care team about your past illnesses and your current health condition. • Tell your health team if you have any food or medication allergies. • Make sure you know what to do when you leave the hospital. •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Your Interprofessional Plan of Care • Your hospital admission for your total hip replacement will follow an “interprofessional plan of care” more commonly called a "Clinical Pathway".
    [Show full text]
  • Surgical Challenges in Complex Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty
    A Review Paper Surgical Challenges in Complex Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Sathappan S. Sathappan, MD, Eric J. Strauss, MD, Daniel Ginat, BS, Vidyadhar Upasani, BS, and Paul E. Di Cesare, MD should be assessed, the Thomas test should be used to Abstract determine presence of flexion contracture, and limb-length Complex primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) is defined as discrepancy should be documented with the patient in the primary THA in patients with compromised bony or soft-tissue supine and upright positions (with use of blocks for stand- states, including but not limited to dysplastic hip, ankylosed hip, prior hip fracture, protrusio acetabuli, certain neuromus- ing, allowing the extent of limb-length correction to be 3 cular conditions, skeletal dysplasia, and previous bony proce- estimated). dures about the hip. Intraoperatively, provisions must be made Standard anteroposterior (AP) and lateral x-rays of the for the possible use of modular implants and/or bone grafts. In hips should reveal underlying hip pathology and facili- this article, we review the principles of preoperative, intraop- tate surgical planning and component templating (Figure erative, and postoperative management of patients requiring a 4 complex primary THA. 1). Special imaging modalities, including computed tomography (CT) of the hip, may be useful in complex .S. surgeons annually perform more than 150,000 hip arthroplasty. CT provides 3-dimensional information total hip arthroplasties (THAs), 90% of which about anterior and posterior column deficiencies, socket are primary procedures.1 Improved surgical size, and thickness of the anterior and posterior walls and technique and instrumentation have expanded allows visualization of the external iliac vessels to ensure Uthe clinical indications for THA to include patients who previously would not have been considered eligible for this procedure.
    [Show full text]