The PHILJA Judicial Journal
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Commencing the Pre-Judicature Program
The PHILJA Judicial Journal The PHILJA Judicial Journal is published twice a year by the Research, Publications and Linkages Office of the Philippine Judicial Academy (PHILJA). The Journal features articles, lectures, research outputs and other materials of interest to members of the Judiciary, particularly judges, as well as law students and practitioners. The views expressed by the authors do not necessarily reflect the views of either the Academy or its editorial board. Editorial and general offices are located at PHILJA, 3rd Floor, Centennial Building, Supreme Court, Padre Faura St., Manila. Tel. No.: 552-9524 Telefax No.: 552-9628 E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] CONTRIBUTIONS. The PHILJA Judicial Journal invites contributions. Please include the author’s name and biographical information. The editorial board reserves the right to edit the materials submitted for publication. Copyright © 2010 by The PHILJA Judicial Journal. All rights reserved. For more information, please visit the PHILJA website at http://philja.judiciary.gov.ph. SUPREME COURT OF THE PHILIPPINES CHIEF JUSTICE Hon. REYNATO S. PUNO ASSOCIATE JUSTICES Hon. ANTONIO T. CARPIO Hon. RENATO C. CORONA Hon. CONCHITA CARPIO MORALES Hon. MINITA V. CHICO-NAZARIO Hon. PRESBITERO J. VELASCO, Jr. Hon. ANTONIO EDUARDO B. NACHURA Hon. TERESITA J. LEONARDO-DE CASTRO Hon. ARTURO D. BRION Hon. DIOSDADO M. PERALTA Hon. LUCAS P. BERSAMIN Hon. MARIANO C. DEL CASTILLO Hon. ROBERTO A. ABAD Hon. MARTIN S. VILLARAMA, Jr. COURT ADMINISTRATOR Hon. JOSE P. PEREZ DEPUTY COURT ADMINISTRATORS Hon. NIMFA C. VILCHES Hon. JOSE MIDAS P. MARQUEZ Hon. JESUS EDWIN A. VILLASOR CLERK OF COURT Atty. -
Chief Justice Reynato S. Puno Distinguished Lectures Series of 2010
The PHILJA Judicial Journal The PHILJA Judicial Journal is published twice a year by the Research, Publications and Linkages Office of the Philippine Judicial Academy (PHILJA). The Journal features articles, lectures, research outputs and other materials of interest to members of the Judiciary, particularly judges, as well as law students and practitioners. The views expressed by the authors do not necessarily reflect the views of either the Academy or its editorial board. Editorial and general offices are located at PHILJA, 3rd Floor, Centennial Building, Supreme Court, Padre Faura St., Manila. Tel. No.: 552-9524 Telefax No.: 552-9628 Email: [email protected]; [email protected] CONTRIBUTIONS. The PHILJA Judicial Journal invites contributions. Please include author’s name and biographical information. The editorial board reserves the right to edit the materials submitted for publication. Copyright © 2010 by The PHILJA Judicial Journal. All rights reserved. For more information, please visit the PHILJA website at http://philja.judiciary.gov.ph. ISSN 2244-5854 SUPREME COURT OF THE PHILIPPINES CHIEF JUSTICE Hon. RENATO C. CORONA ASSOCIATE JUSTICES Hon. ANTONIO T. CARPIO Hon. CONCHITA CARPIO MORALES Hon. PRESBITERO J. VELASCO, Jr. Hon. ANTONIO EDUARDO B. NACHURA Hon. TERESITA J. LEONARDO-DE CASTRO Hon. ARTURO D. BRION Hon. DIOSDADO M. PERALTA Hon. LUCAS P. BERSAMIN Hon. MARIANO C. DEL CASTILLO Hon. ROBERTO A. ABAD Hon. MARTIN S. VILLARAMA, Jr. Hon. JOSE P. PEREZ Hon. JOSE C. MENDOZA COURT ADMINISTRATOR Hon. JOSE MIDAS P. MARQUEZ DEPUTY COURT ADMINISTRATORS Hon. NIMFA C. VILCHES Hon. EDWIN A. VILLASOR Hon. RAUL B. VILLANUEVA CLERK OF COURT Atty. MA. -
Democracy Initiative Assessment
PHILIPPINE DEMOCRACY INITIATIVE ASSESSMENT Prepared for: U.S. AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT MISSION TO THE PHILIPPINES Prepared by: Clark D. Nehor, Ph. D. Violeta Lopez-Gonzaga, Ph. D. Carolina G. Hernandez, Ph. D. Ross Marlay, Ph. D. Stephen Golub, J.D. JUNE 1991 This paper has been prepared forthe purpose of discussions within USAID/Philippine-.Q Its contents do not necessarily represent the views or Interpretations of the Mission TABLE OF CONTENTS Ezecutive Summary i Acknowledgments 1 Preface 2" Program Concept and Imlementation 4 Administration 5 Introduction 7 Democratic Pluralism 7 Democracy and Economic Development 8 Elements of the Assessment 9 Philippine Sensitivities 10 USAID Existing Programs Related to PDI 11 Political Background 14 Factors that Sustain and Strengthen Philippine Democracy 14 Factors that Weaken and Threaten Philippine Democracy 17 Voice 21 Media 21 Non-governmental Organizations 26 The Voice of Women 28 Choice 30 Elections 30 Governance 34 Legislature 34 Civil-Military Relations 36 Decentralization and the Philippine Democracy Initiative 39 Accountability 45 Redress 47 Human Rights 47 Thp Legal System 52 Summary of Recommendations 63 Appendices List of Persons Interviewed A- Bibliography B-1 Potential Non-govenmental Partners for USAID C-I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The assessment team has mapped the terrain for a USAID-sponsored Philippine Democracy Initiative (PDI) and suggested ways USAID can enhance the prospects for the survival of Philippine democracy. We have looked at USAID's portfolio and found that some existing programs address issues of democratic pluralism. We have set forth a framework and a .et of recommendations that will help VSAID look more systematically toward the future. -
Toc UNCLOS 2011 Book I.Pmd
TheTheThe PHILPHILPHIL AAA JULY - DECEMBER 2011 VOL. 13, ISSUE NO. 36 JJJUDICIALUDICIALUDICIAL OURNALOURNALOURNAL UNCLOS PHILIPPINE MARITIME REGIMES BOOK I PHILIPPINE LAWS AND JURISPRUDENCE The PHILJA Judicial Journal The PHILJA Judicial Journal is published twice a year by the Research, Publications and Linkages Office of the Philippine Judicial Academy (PHILJA). The Journal features articles, lectures, research outputs and other materials of interest to members of the Judiciary, particularly judges, as well as law students and practitioners. The views expressed by the authors do not necessarily reflect the views of either the Academy or its editorial board. Editorial and general offices are located at PHILJA, 3rd Floor, Centennial Building, Supreme Court, Padre Faura St., Manila. Tel. No.: 552-9524 Telefax No.: 552-9621 Email: [email protected]; [email protected] CONTRIBUTIONS. The PHILJA Judicial Journal invites contributions. Please include author’s name and biographical information. The editorial board reserves the right to edit the materials submitted for publication. Copyright © 2011 by The PHILJA Judicial Journal. All rights reserved. For more information, please visit the PHILJA website at http://philja.judiciary.gov.ph. ISSN 2244-5854 SUPREME COURT OF THE PHILIPPINES CHIEF JUSTICE Hon. RENATO C. CORONA ASSOCIATE JUSTICES Hon. ANTONIO T. CARPIO Hon. PRESBITERO J. VELASCO, Jr. Hon. TERESITA J. LEONARDO-DE CASTRO Hon. ARTURO D. BRION Hon. DIOSDADO M. PERALTA Hon. LUCAS P. BERSAMIN Hon. MARIANO C. DEL CASTILLO Hon. ROBERTO A. ABAD Hon. MARTIN S. VILLARAMA, Jr. Hon. JOSE P. PEREZ Hon. JOSE C. MENDOZA Hon. MARIA LOURDES P. A. SERENO Hon. BIENVENIDO L. REYES Hon. ESTELA M. -
Escr-Philippines41.Pdf
1 Executive Summary 42, 32, 2008 The three numbers above are significant to the Philippines. 42 represents the number of years that have passed since the country signed the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. 32 represents the number of years that have passed since the country ratified the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. 2008 represents this year, the year wherein the Philippine government’s performance, in realizing economic, social and cultural rights during the period of 1995-2005, will be assessed. When the Philippine government signed and ratified the Covenant, it affirmed its commitment to promote social progress and better standards of life for all Filipinos. This report will assess how the Philippine government, during the period of 1995-2005, has stood by this commitment. General Framework within which the Covenant is to be implemented The Philippines has enacted numerous laws to comply with the obligations set forth by the Covenant. It has enacted laws for the protection of children, migrant workers, women, and indigenous peoples. But these enacted laws have fallen far short of their objectives of protecting the targeted sectors. Numbers of abused children, trafficked migrant workers, abused women and discriminated indigenous peoples are still high. This can be attributed in part to the lack of effective information dissemination about the Covenant and the local laws that have been enacted in pursuant to the Covenant’s provisions. The Covenant, for instance, has not been translated into any of the country’s major languages or dialects. More importantly, It can also be attributed to mixed government policies and misplaced government resources. -
Villacorta Nov 2009
1 Politics of Constitutional Design and Implementation: Addressing Community Diversity in Mindanao Dr. Wilfrido V. Villacorta Paper presented at the IDEA South-South Symposium on Constitution-Building Theme: “Constitutional Designs for Diversity and Conflict” 12- 15 October, 2009, Jakarta, Indonesia The so-called Mindanao problem has faced the Philippines for five centuries and remains unresolved to this day. Most analysts have regarded it as a political and economic issue, which is not rooted in cultural or religious considerations. In fact, the economic, political, cultural and religious dimensions have become so intertwined in the perceptions of Christians and Muslims in Mindanao that it is difficult to segregate them from each other. The Memorandum of Agreement on the Ancestral Domain Aspect (MOA-AD) would have been the beginning of the solution, had it been handled well by the present government. It sought the expansion of the geographical coverage of the Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao (ARMM) under a Bangsamoro Juridical Entity (BJE). This juridical entity would be empowered to establish its own courts, security, trade, education and election systems and explore and develop natural resources in its own territory. 1 The date set for the signing of that historic document was on 5 August 2008 in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. It was prevented from happening when the Philippine Supreme Court issued a Temporary Restraining Order the day before the scheduled signing. 1 Amina Rasul, “How to Make the the GRP-MILF Peace Process Work,” in Voices of Dissent: A Postscript to the MOA-AD Decision (Mandaluyong City: Magbassa Kita Foundation/ Philippine Council for Islam and Democracy, 2009), p.