DOCSLIB.ORG

The Fall of the Roman Empire

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Fall of the Roman Empire Against the Grain Manuscript 8249 Collecting to the Core — The Fall of the Roman Empire Fred W. Jenkins Anne Doherty Follow this and additional works at: https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/atg Part of the Library and Information Science Commons This document has been made available through Purdue e-Pubs, a service of the Purdue University Libraries. Please contact [email protected] for additional information. Collecting to the Core — The Fall of the Roman Empire by Fred W. Jenkins (Associate Dean for Collections & Operations and Professor, University of Dayton Libraries; Ancient History, Classical Languages and Literatures Subject Editor, Resources for College Libraries) <[email protected]> Column Editor: Anne Doherty (Resources for College Libraries Project Editor, CHOICE/ACRL) <[email protected]> Column Editor’s Note: The “Collecting Commodus (180-192) and wends its leisurely es (men and money) to resist the multiple to the Core” column highlights monographic way through the division of empire into east threats of barbarian invasions. Ward-Perkins works that are essential to the academic li- and west, the end of the western empire in 476, juxtaposes the “horrors of war” found in the brary within a particular discipline, inspired the history of the eastern empire until its fall sources and the painful accommodations made by the Resources for College Libraries bib- in 1453, and the history of the city of Rome by occupied Romans to the “sunnier” picture liography (online at http://www.rclweb.net). from the twelfth to the fifteenth centuries. found in Goffart; in an amusing send-up In each essay, subject specialists introduce Gibbon identified multiple he writes that “some of the and explain the classic titles and topics that causes for the decline of recent literature on the Ger- continue to remain relevant to the undergrad- Rome, most famously the manic settlements reads like uate curriculum and library collection. Dis- rise of Christianity and the an account of a tea party at 11 ciplinary trends may shift, but some classics effect of barbarian invasions. the Roman vicarage.” He never go out of style. — AD Many of the causes he put traces a significant decline in forth reflect a decline in Roman material comfort and civic obligation and virtue economic activity in the fifth n 1996 Glen Bowersock dismissed the among Roman citizens. As a philosophical century leading up to the fall of the western fall of Rome as a paradigm, saying that it historian of the Enlightenment, he thought that empire in 476. Ward-Perkins briefly address- Iis “no longer needed, and like the writing decline “was the natural and inevitable effect es the survival of the Eastern Roman Empire on a faded papyrus, it no longer speaks to of immoderate greatness” (Chapter XXXVIII). until 1453, ascribing it in no small part to luck. us.”1 Many books and articles on the end of the Roman Empire have appeared since, most Gibbon was long the dominant narrative, In the next year Peter Heather’s The Fall of recently Bertrand Lançon’s La chute de despite criticism of his anti-Christian posture. the Roman Empire: A New History of Rome and l’Empire roman: histoire sans fin in late 2017; His successors argued details, but few questioned the Barbarians also argued that Rome’s fall was 12 his subtitle, “story without end,” says it all.2 the basic notion of decline and fall. Everything due to pressure from barbarian invasions. He The idea of the decline and fall of the greatest changed in 1971 when Peter Brown published sees the empire as relatively stable for much of empire in the history of the world retains its The World of Late Antiquity: From Marcus Aure- the fourth century, before the catastrophic defeat fascination, despite the views of many con- lius to Mohammed and founded the new field of of the Roman army by the Goths at Adrianople 5 temporary historians, who see transformation Late Antique studies. He declares in his preface in 378. Heather posits that the Gothic invasion rather than decline. It remains a topic fraught that “it is only too easy to write about the Late of 476-478 and an earlier cluster of invasions with problems. When did the Roman Empire Antique world as if it were a melancholy tale by Goths, Vandals, Alans and others in 405-408 fall? Why? Some view the sack of Rome by of ‘Decline and Fall’: of the end of the Roman were key events in the fall of the western empire, 6 Alaric in 410 as the pivotal event, others the empire as viewed from the West.” Brown shifts even if it limped along for another 65 years. He removal of Romulus Augustulus as the last the narrative to one of transformation and inno- holds the Huns to be indirectly responsible by Roman emperor in the west in 476, still others vation in Late Antique society, mentioning the driving the Germanic peoples west into the em- the death in 565 of Justinian I, the last Eastern sack of Rome in 410 and the fall of the western pire. As the barbarians took over more and more Roman emperor to hold a significant part of empire in 476 almost in passing. His focus is Roman territory, tax revenues declined and the the west, including Rome itself. One can also on social and cultural change, shaped by the imperial government was less and less able to make a case for the fall of Constantinople and rise of Christianity. Continuing in this vein of maintain adequate military forces and the central the Eastern Roman Empire in 1453. Though revisionism, in 1980 Walter Goffart rejected the bureaucracy that governed the Roman state. The Greek in speech and culture, the Byzantines long-standing belief that massive barbarian mi- former Roman provincials gradually lost much called themselves Ῥωμαίοι (Romans) until the grations and invasions brought down the western of their “Romanness,” as Heather calls it, under end; it was German historian and humanist empire. His influentialRomans and Barbarians, their new barbarian masters. While Heather is Hieronymous Wolf who first called them A.D. 418-584 contends instead that the empire a bit more conciliatory toward the supporters Byzantine in 1557. As for causes of decline absorbed and accommodated smallish groups of transformation than is Ward-Perkins, he and fall, Edward Gibbon put forth over two of barbarians in a series of “undramatic adjust- firmly pushes the case for Roman decline and 7 dozen; in 1984 Alexander Demandt identified ments.” Gibbon would have been shocked to for barbarians as the major cause of the fall of more than 200 proposed by various scholars.3 read Goffart’s assertion that “what we call the the western empire in 476. This brief overview will look at a handful of Fall of the Western Roman Empire was an imag- 8 In 2009 Adrian Goldsworthy picked up the key works exploring the end of the Roman Em- inative experiment that got a little out of hand.” banner of decline and fall in his How Rome Fell: pire, with emphasis on recent work in English. Twenty-five years later, Goffart published a Death of a Superpower, which in the original Though he drew heavily upon predeces- sequel, Barbarian Tides, in which he again ar- British edition was titled The Fall of the West.13 sors such as the French historian Le Nain de gues against the many scholars who attribute the Like Gibbon, he takes the death of Marcus Au- fall of Rome completely or in large measure to Tillemont, Edward Gibbon’s History of the 9 relius in 180 as his point of departure, although Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire stands Germanic barbarians. He devotes much effort to he stops with the death of Justinian rather than as the seminal and iconic work on the subject, disproving the existence of a “German” people in continuing the story of the eastern empire. He as well as a monument of English prose.4 First Roman antiquity, contra generations of German views deposition of Romulus Augustulus in published from 1776-88, it was received with scholars who constructed a quasi-mythic account 476 as the actual end of the empire, with Jus- great acclaim and soon translated into French, of German national origins. tinian a brief renewal of former glory before the German, and Italian. Nearly all subsequent By 2005 a reaction to the ideas of transfor- eastern empire became a rump state. Goldswor- work builds on or argues with Gibbon in one mation and accommodation had set in. Bryan thy tells a story of internal conflicts as well as way or another. Gibbon begins with a survey Ward-Perkins, an archaeologist, renewed the the external threats of barbarians and Persians. of the Antonine age (98-180), which he called case for the barbarian invasions as the major He sees the incessant civil wars and revolts that the “most happy and prosperous” (Chapter I) cause of Rome’s fall in his The Fall of Rome: occurred from the end of the Antonine age until in the history of humanity. The narrative of And the End of Civilization.10 He argues that the fall of the western empire as a major cause the decline proper begins with the reign of by the fifth century, Rome lacked the resourc- continued on page 46 Against the Grain / June 2018 <http://www.against-the-grain.com> 45 Collecting to the Core Endnotes from page 45 1. Bowersock, Glen W. “The Vanishing Paradigm of the Fall of Rome.” Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 49, no. of Rome’s decline.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Stories of Ancient Rome Unit 4 Reader Skills Strand Grade 3
    Grade 3 Core Knowledge Language Arts® • Skills Strand Ancient Rome Ancient Stories of of Stories Unit 4 Reader 4 Unit Stories of Ancient Rome Unit 4 Reader Skills Strand GraDE 3 Core Knowledge Language Arts® Creative Commons Licensing This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. You are free: to Share — to copy, distribute and transmit the work to Remix — to adapt the work Under the following conditions: Attribution — You must attribute the work in the following manner: This work is based on an original work of the Core Knowledge® Foundation made available through licensing under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. This does not in any way imply that the Core Knowledge Foundation endorses this work. Noncommercial — You may not use this work for commercial purposes. Share Alike — If you alter, transform, or build upon this work, you may distribute the resulting work only under the same or similar license to this one. With the understanding that: For any reuse or distribution, you must make clear to others the license terms of this work. The best way to do this is with a link to this web page: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ Copyright © 2013 Core Knowledge Foundation www.coreknowledge.org All Rights Reserved. Core Knowledge Language Arts, Listening & Learning, and Tell It Again! are trademarks of the Core Knowledge Foundation. Trademarks and trade names are shown in this book strictly for illustrative and educational purposes and are the property of their respective owners.
    [Show full text]
  • The Politics of Roman Memory in the Age of Justinian DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the D
    The Politics of Roman Memory in the Age of Justinian DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Marion Woodrow Kruse, III Graduate Program in Greek and Latin The Ohio State University 2015 Dissertation Committee: Anthony Kaldellis, Advisor; Benjamin Acosta-Hughes; Nathan Rosenstein Copyright by Marion Woodrow Kruse, III 2015 ABSTRACT This dissertation explores the use of Roman historical memory from the late fifth century through the middle of the sixth century AD. The collapse of Roman government in the western Roman empire in the late fifth century inspired a crisis of identity and political messaging in the eastern Roman empire of the same period. I argue that the Romans of the eastern empire, in particular those who lived in Constantinople and worked in or around the imperial administration, responded to the challenge posed by the loss of Rome by rewriting the history of the Roman empire. The new historical narratives that arose during this period were initially concerned with Roman identity and fixated on urban space (in particular the cities of Rome and Constantinople) and Roman mythistory. By the sixth century, however, the debate over Roman history had begun to infuse all levels of Roman political discourse and became a major component of the emperor Justinian’s imperial messaging and propaganda, especially in his Novels. The imperial history proposed by the Novels was aggressivley challenged by other writers of the period, creating a clear historical and political conflict over the role and import of Roman history as a model or justification for Roman politics in the sixth century.
    [Show full text]
  • RICE, CARL ROSS. Diocletian's “Great
    ABSTRACT RICE, CARL ROSS. Diocletian’s “Great Persecutions”: Minority Religions and the Roman Tetrarchy. (Under the direction of Prof. S. Thomas Parker) In the year 303, the Roman Emperor Diocletian and the other members of the Tetrarchy launched a series of persecutions against Christians that is remembered as the most severe, widespread, and systematic persecution in the Church’s history. Around that time, the Tetrarchy also issued a rescript to the Pronconsul of Africa ordering similar persecutory actions against a religious group known as the Manichaeans. At first glance, the Tetrarchy’s actions appear to be the result of tensions between traditional classical paganism and religious groups that were not part of that system. However, when the status of Jewish populations in the Empire is examined, it becomes apparent that the Tetrarchy only persecuted Christians and Manichaeans. This thesis explores the relationship between the Tetrarchy and each of these three minority groups as it attempts to understand the Tetrarchy’s policies towards minority religions. In doing so, this thesis will discuss the relationship between the Roman state and minority religious groups in the era just before the Empire’s formal conversion to Christianity. It is only around certain moments in the various religions’ relationships with the state that the Tetrarchs order violence. Consequently, I argue that violence towards minority religions was a means by which the Roman state policed boundaries around its conceptions of Roman identity. © Copyright 2016 Carl Ross Rice All Rights Reserved Diocletian’s “Great Persecutions”: Minority Religions and the Roman Tetrarchy by Carl Ross Rice A thesis submitted to the Graduate Faculty of North Carolina State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts History Raleigh, North Carolina 2016 APPROVED BY: ______________________________ _______________________________ S.
    [Show full text]
  • Livy's View of the Roman National Character
    James Luce, December 5th, 1993 Livy's View of the Roman National Character As early as 1663, Francis Pope named his plantation, in what would later become Washington, DC, "Rome" and renamed Goose Creek "Tiber", a local hill "Capitolium", an example of the way in which the colonists would draw upon ancient Rome for names, architecture and ideas. The founding fathers often called America "the New Rome", a place where, as Charles Lee said to Patrick Henry, Roman republican ideals were being realized. The Roman historian Livy (Titus Livius, 59 BC-AD 17) lived at the juncture of the breakdown of the Roman Republic and the rise of the Roman Empire. His 142 book History of Rome from 753 to 9 BC (35 books now extant, the rest epitomes) was one of the most read Latin authors by early American colonists, partly because he wrote about the Roman national character and his unique view of how that character was formed. "National character" is no longer considered a valid term, nations may not really have specific national characters, but many think they do. The ancients believed states or peoples had a national character and that it arose one of 3 ways: 1) innate/racial: Aristotle believed that all non-Greeks were barbarous and suited to be slaves; Romans believed that Carthaginians were perfidious. 2) influence of geography/climate: e.g., that Northern tribes were vigorous but dumb 3) influence of institutions and national norms based on political and family life. The Greek historian Polybios believed that Roman institutions (e.g., division of government into senate, assemblies and magistrates, each with its own powers) made the Romans great, and the architects of the American constitution read this with especial care and interest.
    [Show full text]
  • Tatarstan, Dagestan, and Chechnya
    The Institutional Design of Russian Federalism: A Comparative Study of Three Republics; Tatarstan, Dagestan, and Chechnya STERGOS KALOUDIS Abstract: Federalism, as an institutional design, is a rubric that can consolidate all regions within Russia into a stable state. Lessons learned in Tatarstan and Dagestan since 1990 provide the necessary guidelines that may facilitate Chechnya’s peaceful inclusion into the state. Federalism can demonstrate to the citizenry that they are better off within a federal system than an independent system. Keywords: asymmetry, Chechnya, Dagestan, federalism, Russia, Tatarstan Introduction ver the course of the past decade federalism has, for the most part, allowed Russia to O temporarily stave off ethnically motivated separatism by granting varying levels of autonomy to the regions. The question follows as to why this has worked successfully in certain non-Russian areas, specifically the republics of Tatarstan and Dagestan, which have joined with Moscow under this federalist arrangement, while other ethnic groups and states, most notably the Chechens, have pushed for secession and violence. Moreover, is instability inherent to an ethnically diverse federation or can agreement on the breakdown of power be achieved that will pacify all parties involved? Following the resignation of Soviet President Mikhail Gorbachev, the Russian rump state lost the coercive and persuasive ability to rule a centrally controlled empire. Instead, the Russian masses were bequeathed a decentralized nation devoid of a coherent national
    [Show full text]
  • The Crisis and Collapse of the Roman Empire
    The Crisis and Collapse of the Roman Empire The Crisis and Collapse of the Roman Empire Lesson plan (Polish) Lesson plan (English) The Crisis and Collapse of the Roman Empire The capture of Rome by the Vandals Source: Karl Bryullo, Zdobycie Rzymu przez Wandalów, between 1833 and 1836, Tretyakov Gallery, licencja: CC 0. Link to the lesson You will learn to define the causes of the crisis of the Roman Empire in the third century CE; telling who was Diocletian and what he did to end the crisis; to describe when was the Roman Empire divided into the East and West Empires; to define what was the Migration Period and how did it influence the collapse of the Western Roman Empire; to define at what point in history the Antiquity ended and the Middle Ages started. Nagranie dostępne na portalu epodreczniki.pl Nagranie abstraktu The period of “Roman Peace”, ushered in by Emperor Augustus, brought the Empire peace and prosperity. Halfway through the second century CE the Roman Empire reached the peak of its power and greatness. The provinces thrived, undergoing the process of romanization, i.e. the spread of Roman models and customs. It was, however, not an easy task to maintain peace and power in such a large area. In order to keep the borders safe, the construction of the border fortification system, known as the limes was undertaken. Its most widely‐known portion – the over 120 kilometer‐long Hadrian’s Wall – is still present in Britain. That notwithstanding, the Empire was facing ever greater inner problems. The bust of Emperor Augustus Source: Augustus Bevilacqua, Glyptothek, Munich, licencja: Especially in the third century, the state’s CC 0.
    [Show full text]
  • The Legacy of the Roman Empire and the Middle Ages in the West The
    The Legacy of the Roman Empire and the Middle Ages in the West The Roman Empire reigned from 27 BCE to 476 CE throughout the Mediterranean world, including parts of Europe, the Middle East, and North Africa. The fall of the Roman Empire in the West in 476 CE marked the end of the period of classical antiquity and ushered in a new era in world history. Three civilizations emerged as successors to the Romans in the Mediterranean world: the Byzantine Empire (in many ways a continuation of the Eastern Roman Empire), and the civilizations of Islam and Western Europe. These three civilizations would become rivals and adversaries over the course of the succeeding centuries. They developed distinct religious, cultural, social, political, and linguistic characteristics that shaped the path each civilization would take throughout the course of the Middle Ages and beyond. The Middle Ages in European history refers to the period spanning the fifth through the fifteenth century. The fall of the Western Roman Empire typically represents the beginning of the Middle Ages. Scholars divide the Middle Ages into three eras: the Early Middle Ages (400–1000), the High Middle Ages (1000–1300), and the Late Middle Ages (1300–1500). The Renaissance and the Age of Discovery traditionally mark the end of the Middle Ages and the beginning of the early modern period in European history. The legacy of the Roman Empire, and the division of its territory into three separate civilizations, impacted the course of world history and continues to influence the development of each region to this day.
    [Show full text]
  • The Western Roman Empire from Augustus to Trajan 265 Exploitation and Assimilation
    the western roman empire from augustus to trajan 265 Exploitation and assimilation: thE wEstErn roman EmpirE from augustus to trajan Richard Hingley* 1. Introduction this chapter explores the assimilation of indigenous peoples across the western roman empire from the end of the first millennium BC and in the first century AD. it provides an assessment of the variable ways in which rome incorporated provincial peoples and the reactions of these people to imperial control. the roman administration usually co-opted local élites into the power structure of empire, while communities that were not co-operative were forced into submission or defeated. a number of influ- ential texts, published during the past twenty years, are drawn upon, in order to review interpretations of roman identity and social change. these recent works explore how people of variable status were integrated into the roman empire in ways that exploited their abilities and local resourc- es. the empire expanded across a vast area and was consolidated as a result of the co-opting of local people. the successful assimilation of such peo- ples transformed their cultures but did not create a fully unified and coher- ent ‘roman’ identity; people retained aspects of their indigenous identities in the transformed local cultures that constituted individual elements of a mosaic of regional societies across the empire. the expansion of roman imperial control was based on a process of imperial incorporation that exploited people while enabling them to live in new ways. this involved the spread of a malleable imperial culture—a culture of inclusion and exclusion (dench 2005, 35)—that identified and helped to create imperial order through a structuring system of difference.1 * i am grateful to dexter hoyos for asking me to write this paper and to Chris gosden, shelly hales, tamar hodos, david mattingly, nico roymans, michael shanks, Carol van driel-murray, Christina unwin, rob witcher and greg woolf for discussion over a number of years of some of the issues addressed here.
    [Show full text]
  • The Barbarians Invade the Roman Empire
    THE STORY OF EUROPE FROM THE FALL OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE TO THE REFORMATION THE STORY OF EUROPE FROM THE FALL OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE TO THE REFORMATION BY H. E. MARSHALL CONTAINING TWELVE MAPS YESTERDAY’S CLASSICS CHAPEL HILL, NORTH CAROLINA Cover and arrangement © 2006 Yesterday’s Classics. This edition, first published in 2006 by Yesterday’s Classics, is an unabridged republi- cation of the work originally published as A Short Sketch of European History from the Fall of the Roman Empire to the Reformation by Frederick A. Stokes Company in 1920. For a full listing of books published by Yesterday’s Classics, please visit www.yesterdaysclassics.com. Yesterday’s Classics is the publishing arm of the Baldwin Project which presents the complete text of dozens of classic books for children at www.mainlesson.com under the editorship of Lisa M. Ripperton and T. A. Roth. ISBN-10: 1-59915-158-8 ISBN-13: 978-1-59915-158-8 Yesterday’s Classics PO Box 3418 Chapel Hill, NC 27515 CONTENTS I. THE BARBARIANS INVADE THE ROMAN 1 EMPIRE II. THE RISE OF THE FRANKS 10 III. THE BARBARIANS RULE IN ROME 15 IV. THE RISE AND FALL OF JUSTINIAN’S EMPIRE―THE ROLE OF THE EASTERN EMPIRE 21 V. GREGORY THE GREAT LAYS THE FOUNDATION OF PAPAL POWER 27 VI. THE RISE OF MOHAMMEDANISM 32 VII. THE CONQUEST OF SPAIN BY THE ARABS 39 VIII. THE DEFEAT OF THE SARACENS―THE RISE OF THE CAROLINGIANS―THE DONATION OF PEPIN 45 IX. THE REIGN OF CHARLEMAGNE―THE BEGINNING OF THE HOLY ROMAN EMPIRE 53 X.
    [Show full text]
  • Explaining Irredentism: the Case of Hungary and Its Transborder Minorities in Romania and Slovakia
    Explaining irredentism: the case of Hungary and its transborder minorities in Romania and Slovakia by Julianna Christa Elisabeth Fuzesi A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of PhD in Government London School of Economics and Political Science University of London 2006 1 UMI Number: U615886 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U615886 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 DECLARATION I hereby declare that the work presented in this thesis is entirely my own. Signature Date ....... 2 UNIVERSITY OF LONDON Abstract of Thesis Author (full names) ..Julianna Christa Elisabeth Fiizesi...................................................................... Title of thesis ..Explaining irredentism: the case of Hungary and its transborder minorities in Romania and Slovakia............................................................................................................................. ....................................................................................... Degree..PhD in Government............... This thesis seeks to explain irredentism by identifying the set of variables that determine its occurrence. To do so it provides the necessary definition and comparative analytical framework, both lacking so far, and thus establishes irredentism as a field of study in its own right. The thesis develops a multi-variate explanatory model that is generalisable yet succinct.
    [Show full text]
  • Lesson 18 - the Situation in the West After the Fall of Rome
    Church History Lesson 18 - The Situation in the West After the Fall of Rome 1. Introduction - A Crumbling Empire 1.1. In the last session we looked at a number of Christological controversies which embroiled the church, and consequently the Empire, up until the council of Chalcedon in 451. 1.2. As we saw, these controversies involved both the East and the West, but there were of far greater concern in the East than in the West, and the majority of bishops attending the various councils were overwhelmingly from the East. 1.3. Although there were a number of reasons for this, one of the major reasons was the rapidly changing situation in the West. After Rome was sacked for the first time in 410 AD, it sent shockwaves through the whole empire, but especially in the West. Although the Eastern part of the Empire continued in one form or another for over 1,000 years more, the situation in the West was far different. 1.4. Today we will take a brief look at what happened in the West after the first sacking of Rome in 410, and see how this affected life and the church in the West for the next 300 years or so. 2. The Barbarian Invasions 2.1. The events that most affected life and the church in the West were a series of invasions by “barbarian” tribes. 2.2. Obviously the first major invasion was when Alaric and his band of Visigoths, who invaded Italy and sacked Rome in 410. It was the shockwaves from this event that caused Augustine to write his opus City of God.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is Racial Domination?
    STATE OF THE ART WHAT IS RACIAL DOMINATION? Matthew Desmond Department of Sociology, University of Wisconsin—Madison Mustafa Emirbayer Department of Sociology, University of Wisconsin—Madison Abstract When students of race and racism seek direction, they can find no single comprehensive source that provides them with basic analytical guidance or that offers insights into the elementary forms of racial classification and domination. We believe the field would benefit greatly from such a source, and we attempt to offer one here. Synchronizing and building upon recent theoretical innovations in the area of race, we lend some conceptual clarification to the nature and dynamics of race and racial domination so that students of the subjects—especially those seeking a general (if economical) introduction to the vast field of race studies—can gain basic insight into how race works as well as effective (and fallacious) ways to think about racial domination. Focusing primarily on the American context, we begin by defining race and unpacking our definition. We then describe how our conception of race must be informed by those of ethnicity and nationhood. Next, we identify five fallacies to avoid when thinking about racism. Finally, we discuss the resilience of racial domination, concentrating on how all actors in a society gripped by racism reproduce the conditions of racial domination, as well as on the benefits and drawbacks of approaches that emphasize intersectionality. Keywords: Race, Race Theory, Racial Domination, Inequality, Intersectionality INTRODUCTION Synchronizing and building upon recent theoretical innovations in the area of race, we lend some conceptual clarification to the nature and dynamics of race and racial domination, providing in a single essay a source through which thinkers—especially those seeking a general ~if economical! introduction to the vast field of race studies— can gain basic insight into how race works as well as effective ways to think about racial domination.
    [Show full text]