International Subcommission on Stratigraphy
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
A Review of the Classification of Jurassic Aspidoceratid Ammonites – the Superfamily Aspidoceratoidea
VOLUMINA JURASSICA, 2020, XVIII (1): 47–52 DOI: 10.7306/VJ.18.4 A review of the classification of Jurassic aspidoceratid ammonites – the Superfamily Aspidoceratoidea Horacio PARENT1, Günter SCHWEIGERT2, Armin SCHERZINGER3 Key words: Superfamily Aspidoceratoidea, Aspidoceratidae, Epipeltoceratinae emended, Peltoceratidae, Gregoryceratinae nov. subfam. Abstract. The aspidoceratid ammonites have been traditionally included in the superfamily Perisphinctoidea. However, the basis of this is unclear for they bear unique combinations of characters unknown in typical perisphinctoids: (1) the distinct laevaptychus, (2) stout shells with high growth rate of the whorl section area, (3) prominent ornamentation with tubercles, spines and strong growth lines running in parallel over strong ribs, (4) lack of constrictions, (5) short to very short bodychamber, and (6) sexual dimorphism characterized by minia- turized microconchs and small-sized macroconchs besides the larger ones, including changes of sex during ontogeny in many cases. Considering the uniqueness of these characters we propose herein to raise the family Aspidoceratidae to the rank of a superfamily Aspi- doceratoidea, ranging from the earliest Late Callovian to the Early Berriasian Jacobi Zone. The new superfamily includes two families, Aspidoceratidae (Aspidoceratinae, Euaspidoceratinae, Epipeltoceratinae and Hybonoticeratinae), and Peltoceratidae (Peltoceratinae and Gregoryceratinae nov. subfam.). The highly differentiated features of the aspidoceratoids indicate that their life-histories -
Schmitz, M. D. 2000. Appendix 2: Radioisotopic Ages Used In
Appendix 2 Radioisotopic ages used in GTS2020 M.D. SCHMITZ 1285 1286 Appendix 2 GTS GTS Sample Locality Lat-Long Lithostratigraphy Age 6 2s 6 2s Age Type 2020 2012 (Ma) analytical total ID ID Period Epoch Age Quaternary À not compiled Neogene À not compiled Pliocene Miocene Paleogene Oligocene Chattian Pg36 biotite-rich layer; PAC- Pieve d’Accinelli section, 43 35040.41vN, Scaglia Cinerea Fm, 42.3 m above base of 26.57 0.02 0.04 206Pb/238U B2 northeastern Apennines, Italy 12 29034.16vE section Rupelian Pg35 Pg20 biotite-rich layer; MCA- Monte Cagnero section (Chattian 43 38047.81vN, Scaglia Cinerea Fm, 145.8 m above base 31.41 0.03 0.04 206Pb/238U 145.8, equivalent to GSSP), northeastern Apennines, Italy 12 28003.83vE of section MCA/84-3 Pg34 biotite-rich layer; MCA- Monte Cagnero section (Chattian 43 38047.81vN, Scaglia Cinerea Fm, 142.8 m above base 31.72 0.02 0.04 206Pb/238U 142.8 GSSP), northeastern Apennines, Italy 12 28003.83vE of section Eocene Priabonian Pg33 Pg19 biotite-rich layer; MASS- Massignano (Oligocene GSSP), near 43.5328 N, Scaglia Cinerea Fm, 14.7 m above base of 34.50 0.04 0.05 206Pb/238U 14.7, equivalent to Ancona, northeastern Apennines, 13.6011 E section MAS/86-14.7 Italy Pg32 biotite-rich layer; MASS- Massignano (Oligocene GSSP), near 43.5328 N, Scaglia Cinerea Fm, 12.9 m above base of 34.68 0.04 0.06 206Pb/238U 12.9 Ancona, northeastern Apennines, 13.6011 E section Italy Pg31 Pg18 biotite-rich layer; MASS- Massignano (Oligocene GSSP), near 43.5328 N, Scaglia Cinerea Fm, 12.7 m above base of 34.72 0.02 0.04 206Pb/238U -
Palaeoecology and Palaeoenvironments of the Middle Jurassic to Lowermost Cretaceous Agardhfjellet Formation (Bathonian–Ryazanian), Spitsbergen, Svalbard
NORWEGIAN JOURNAL OF GEOLOGY Vol 99 Nr. 1 https://dx.doi.org/10.17850/njg99-1-02 Palaeoecology and palaeoenvironments of the Middle Jurassic to lowermost Cretaceous Agardhfjellet Formation (Bathonian–Ryazanian), Spitsbergen, Svalbard Maayke J. Koevoets1, Øyvind Hammer1 & Crispin T.S. Little2 1Natural History Museum, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1172 Blindern, 0318 Oslo, Norway. 2School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, United Kingdom. E-mail corresponding author (Maayke J. Koevoets): [email protected] We describe the invertebrate assemblages in the Middle Jurassic to lowermost Cretaceous of the Agardhfjellet Formation present in the DH2 rock-core material of Central Spitsbergen (Svalbard). Previous studies of the Agardhfjellet Formation do not accurately reflect the distribution of invertebrates throughout the unit as they were limited to sampling discontinuous intervals at outcrop. The rock-core material shows the benthic bivalve fauna to reflect dysoxic, but not anoxic environments for the Oxfordian–Lower Kimmeridgian interval with sporadic monospecific assemblages of epifaunal bivalves, and more favourable conditions in the Volgian, with major increases in abundance and diversity of Hartwellia sp. assemblages. Overall, the new information from cores shows that abundance, diversity and stratigraphic continuity of the fossil record in the Upper Jurassic of Spitsbergen are considerably higher than indicated in outcrop studies. The inferred life positions and feeding habits of the benthic fauna refine our understanding of the depositional environments of the Agardhfjellet Formation. The pattern of occurrence of the bivalve genera is correlated with published studies of Arctic localities in East Greenland and northern Siberia and shows similarities in palaeoecology with the former but not the latter. -
Crustacea : Decapoda : Erymidae) Dans Le Jurassique
Première occurrence d’Enoploclytia M’Coy, 1849 (Crustacea : Decapoda : Erymidae) dans le Jurassique First occurence of Enoploclytia M’Coy, 1849 (Crustacea: Decapoda: Erymidae) in the Jurassic Julien Devillez Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris Centre de Recherche sur la Paléobiodiversité et les Paléoenvironnements (CR2P, UMR 7207), Sorbonne Universités, MNHN, UPMC, CNRS, 57 rue Cuvier F-75005 Paris (France) [email protected] Sylvain Charbonnier Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris Centre de Recherche sur la Paléobiodiversité et les Paléoenvironnements (CR2P, UMR 7207), Sorbonne Universités, MNHN, UPMC, CNRS, 57 rue Cuvier F-75005 Paris (France) [email protected] Jean-Philippe Pezy Normandie Univ, UNICAEN, CNRS, M2C, 14000 CAEN, France [email protected] RÉSUMÉ Parmi les Erymidae Van Straelen, 1925, connus dès le Permien supérieur (Changhsingien) et répandus au Jurassique, le genre Enoploclytia M’Coy, 1849 passe pour être apparu tardivement en raison de son absence avant le Crétacé. Jusqu’à présent, le plus ancien représentant était E. augustobonae Devillez, Charbonnier, Hyžný & Leroy, 2016 du Crétacé inférieur (Barrémien) de l’est du bassin de Paris (France). Cependant, un nouveau fossile récolté en Normandie (France), présentant une architecture des sillons de la carapace typique d’Enoploclytia, atteste de la présence du genre dès le Jurassique supérieur (Oxfordien). MOTS CLÉS Crustacé, Erymidae, France, homard, Jurassique, Mésozoïque, Normandie. ABSTRACT Among the Erymidae Van Straelen, 1925, known as early as the Late Permian (Changhsingian) and widespread in the Jurassic, the genus Enoploclytia M’Coy, 1849 seems to have a late appearance because of its lack before the Cretaceous. Until now, the oldest representative was E. -
Dorset and East Devon Coast for Inclusion in the World Heritage List
Nomination of the Dorset and East Devon Coast for inclusion in the World Heritage List © Dorset County Council 2000 Dorset County Council, Devon County Council and the Dorset Coast Forum June 2000 Published by Dorset County Council on behalf of Dorset County Council, Devon County Council and the Dorset Coast Forum. Publication of this nomination has been supported by English Nature and the Countryside Agency, and has been advised by the Joint Nature Conservation Committee and the British Geological Survey. Maps reproduced from Ordnance Survey maps with the permission of the Controller of HMSO. © Crown Copyright. All rights reserved. Licence Number: LA 076 570. Maps and diagrams reproduced/derived from British Geological Survey material with the permission of the British Geological Survey. © NERC. All rights reserved. Permit Number: IPR/4-2. Design and production by Sillson Communications +44 (0)1929 552233. Cover: Duria antiquior (A more ancient Dorset) by Henry De la Beche, c. 1830. The first published reconstruction of a past environment, based on the Lower Jurassic rocks and fossils of the Dorset and East Devon Coast. © Dorset County Council 2000 In April 1999 the Government announced that the Dorset and East Devon Coast would be one of the twenty-five cultural and natural sites to be included on the United Kingdom’s new Tentative List of sites for future nomination for World Heritage status. Eighteen sites from the United Kingdom and its Overseas Territories have already been inscribed on the World Heritage List, although only two other natural sites within the UK, St Kilda and the Giant’s Causeway, have been granted this status to date. -
Tayside, Central and Fife Tayside, Central and Fife
Detail of the Lower Devonian jawless, armoured fish Cephalaspis from Balruddery Den. © Perth Museum & Art Gallery, Perth & Kinross Council Review of Fossil Collections in Scotland Tayside, Central and Fife Tayside, Central and Fife Stirling Smith Art Gallery and Museum Perth Museum and Art Gallery (Culture Perth and Kinross) The McManus: Dundee’s Art Gallery and Museum (Leisure and Culture Dundee) Broughty Castle (Leisure and Culture Dundee) D’Arcy Thompson Zoology Museum and University Herbarium (University of Dundee Museum Collections) Montrose Museum (Angus Alive) Museums of the University of St Andrews Fife Collections Centre (Fife Cultural Trust) St Andrews Museum (Fife Cultural Trust) Kirkcaldy Galleries (Fife Cultural Trust) Falkirk Collections Centre (Falkirk Community Trust) 1 Stirling Smith Art Gallery and Museum Collection type: Independent Accreditation: 2016 Dumbarton Road, Stirling, FK8 2KR Contact: [email protected] Location of collections The Smith Art Gallery and Museum, formerly known as the Smith Institute, was established at the bequest of artist Thomas Stuart Smith (1815-1869) on land supplied by the Burgh of Stirling. The Institute opened in 1874. Fossils are housed onsite in one of several storerooms. Size of collections 700 fossils. Onsite records The CMS has recently been updated to Adlib (Axiel Collection); all fossils have a basic entry with additional details on MDA cards. Collection highlights 1. Fossils linked to Robert Kidston (1852-1924). 2. Silurian graptolite fossils linked to Professor Henry Alleyne Nicholson (1844-1899). 3. Dura Den fossils linked to Reverend John Anderson (1796-1864). Published information Traquair, R.H. (1900). XXXII.—Report on Fossil Fishes collected by the Geological Survey of Scotland in the Silurian Rocks of the South of Scotland. -
INJURIES - a KEY to UNDERSTANDING LIFE MODES of AMMONOIDS Keupp, Helmut Institut Für Paläontologie, Freie Universität Berlin, Malteserstr
©Geol. Bundesanstalt, Wien; download unter www.geologie.ac.at INJURIES - A KEY TO UNDERSTANDING LIFE MODES OF AMMONOIDS Keupp, Helmut Institut für Paläontologie, Freie Universität Berlin, Malteserstr. 74-100, D-12249, Berlin. Email: [email protected] Comparative studies of the different types of regenerated injuries, which had been resulted from predatory interactivities, and their positions along the aperture of Mesozoic ammonoids (Early to Middle Triassic, Jurassic) allow to distinguish taxa with demersial modes of life and taxa which lived predominantely within the free water column , respectively. The main predators at the bottom were pincers-bearing crustaceans and in some cases also pycnodontid fishes, while predominantely different kind of fishes attacked free swimming ammonoids. A bimodal distribution (Fig.l) of same types of injuries caused by crustaceans along the aperture exhibits information about attacks during active as well as resting phases of these ammonoid animals, proving their demersial life style (KEUPP, 1997). From analogous types of injuries and their similar distribution patterns on the shell, a more or less bottom related life mode of Middle Triassic ptychitids is postulated as well as for the longidome Jurassic morphotypes with simple bifurcating ribs [e.g. Dactylioceras (Lower Toarcian) and several perisphinctids (Upper Jurassic)]. In contrast, the normal distribution of injury positions at the aperture, for example of Liassic harpoceratids, presumingly mostly caused by fish-attacks, indicates epipelagic life style. The often observed cases of multiple attacks on the same ammonoid specimen always with the same cofiguration of shell breakage and same position of injuries on the shell can be interpreted to hint at a stable habitat stationarity of both the predator and the ammonite. -
The Middle Oxfordian to Lowermost Kimmeridgian Ammonite
Volumina Jurassica, 2010, Viii: 5–48 The Middle Oxfordian to lowermost Kimmeridgian ammonite succession at Mikhalenino (Kostroma District) of the Russian Platform, and its stratigraphical and palaeobiogeographical importance Ewa GŁOWNIAK1, Dmitry N. KISELEV2, Mikhail ROGOV3, Andrzej WIERZBOWSKI1, John K. WRIGHT4 Key words: ammonites, biostratigraphy, Boreal zonation, Subboreal zonation, Submediterranean zonation, correlation, Oxfordian/ Kimmeridgian boundary. Abstract. The Mikhalenino section on the Russian Platform has yielded numerous ammonites from the Middle and Upper Oxfordian and lowermost Kimmeridgian, collected bed by bed. The ammonites belong mostly to the Boreal family Cardioceratidae, but also to the Sub- boreal family Aulacostephanidae; additionally at some levels there were collected various Submediterranean ammonites (Perisphinctidae, Oppeliidae and Aspidoceratidae). The co-occurrence of ammonites representative of different faunal provinces makes possible recognition of the Boreal, Subboreal, and partly also Submediterranean standard zonations. In consequence, it is possible to make a close correlation between these zonal schemes. The Oxfordian/Kimmeridgian boundary at the Pseudocordata/Baylei zonal boundary of the Subboreal zonal scheme corresponds precisely to the Rosenkrantzi/Bauhini zonal boundary. This boundary of the stages defined well faunistically in the Flodigarry section (Isle of Skye, Scotland) and proposed as a candidate for the uniform Oxfordian/Kimmeridgian boundary, can be also recognized in the Russian sec- tion studied. The boundary can be traced in the Mikhalenino section using the same criteria as used at Staffin: the appearance of the first representatives of Pictonia [M]–Prorasenia [m] (Subboreal), and the first appearance of Amoeboceras (Plasmatites) (Boreal). This indi- cates the large correlation potential of the boundary defined in this way. The research on the Mikhalenino section has provided the new palaeontological findings described in this study. -
2. General Index
Downloaded from http://pygs.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on September 29, 2021 2. General Index abandoned river courses. Vale of York 40,223-32 anhydrite 50.78.79,81,86,88.143-54 Abbey Crags, Knaresborough Gorge 46,290 Anisocardiu tenera (Antiquicyprina) loweana 39, 117, 130, 131.738-9 Acadian 46,175 ff.; 50,255-65 anisotropy of vitrinites 39,515-26 acanthite 46,135 ankerite 50,87 Acanthodiacrodium cf. simplex 42,412-3 annelida, in Yorkshire Museum 41,402 Acanthodiacrodium rotundatum 45.124 antimony, trace element in galena 44,153 Acanthodiacrodium cf. tumidum 45,124 apatite 44,438 Acanthopleuroceras sp. 42, 152-3 apatite fission-track palaeotemperatures. north-west England 50,95-9 accretionary lapilli, Cwm Clwyd Tuff 39,201,206-7,209,215-6 Apatocythere (Apatocythere) simulans 45, 243 Acheulian handaxes 41,89,94-5 Apedale Fault 50. 196," 198 acid intrusions, Ordovician and Caledonian, geochemical characteristics aplites. Whin Sill 47,251 of 39,33-57 Apollo's Coppice, Shropshire 50,193 acritarchs. Arenig 42. 405 Arachinidiuin smithii 42, 213 acritarchs, Ordovician 47,271-4 Araucarites phillipsii 45,287 acritarchs,Tremadoc 38 45-55; 45,123-7 archaeology, Lincolnshire 41.75 ff. Actinocamax plenus 40,586 Arcomva unioniformis 39.117.133, 134, 138 Acton Reynald Hall, Shropshire 50,193,198,199,200,202,204 Arcow"45,19ff.' adamellite (Threlkeld Microgranite) 40,211-22 Arcow Wood Quarry 39,169,446,448,455,459,470-1 aegirine 44,356 arctic-alpine flora. Teesdale 40.206 aeolian deposition, Devensian loess 40,31 ff. Arenicolites 41,416,436-7 aeolian deposition. Permian 40,54.55 Arenobulirnina advena 45,240 aeolian sands, Permian 45, 11-18 Arenobulimina chapmani 45,240 aeolian sedimentation, Sherwood Sandstone Group 50,68-71 Arenobulirnina macfadyeni 45, 240 aeromagnetic modelling, west Cumbria 50,103-12 arfvedsonite 44,356 aeromagnetic survey, eastern England 46,313,335—41 argentopyrite 46, 134-5 aeromagnetic survey, Norfolk 46.313 Arniocreas fulcaries 42, 150-1 Africa, North, Devonian of 40,277-8 arsenic 44,431 ff. -
GSSP and Stratotypes
1st International Congress on Stratigraphy – STRATI 2013 GSSP and Stratotypes 41 Ciências da Terra (UNL), nº especial VII 42 1st International Congress on Stratigraphy – STRATI 2013 Redefining the Devonian-Carboniferous boundary: overview on problems and possible solutions Markus Aretz Université de Toulouse (UPS), GET (OMP), 14 Avenue E. Belin, 31400 Toulouse, France, [email protected], Tel : +33 5 61 33 26 74, Fax: +33 5 61 33 25 60 The discussion where the Devonian-Carboniferous boundary (DCB) should be placed has a long tradition. The current boundary criterion and the GSSP at La Serre have become under critics already when they were defined, and the work of the last two decades have highlighted several problems. Findings of supposed Carboniferous taxa in Devonian strata (including the guide fossil) and taxonomic problems with the conodont lineage to define the DCB revived the discussions in the last years not only on the suitability of the GSSP section, but also on the criterion itself. Several diverging approaches exist for the definition of a DCB, but none of them offers an easy solution. Future work has to focus on detailed biostratigraphic work in different groups and should respect stratigraphic stability for the DCB. The profound changes in the latest Devonian – earliest Carboniferous biosphere culminated in the Hangenberg Event, which is found below, but not too far from the DCB. It is easily recognizable in many sections without specific knowledge in the taxonomy of a specific fossil group. Hence, the Hangenberg interval offers not only an alternative for a more or less accurate placement of the DCB, which is sufficient for many geologists, but the extinctions and appearances around the level offers a great potential for detailed biostratigraphic zonations, and thus a precise definition of the DCB. -
Hastings & District Geological Society Journal
Hastings & District Geological Society Journal Hastings and District Geological Society affiliated to the Geologists’ Association President Professor G. David Price, UCL Founded 1992 Rock fall east of Ecclesbourne Glen, Hastings - 11th December 2009 Picture by David Burr Volume 16 December 2010 Cover picture: Rock fall east of Ecclesbourne Glen, Hastings - photo: David Burr (see page 46 for article) Taxonomic/Nomenclatural Disclaimer - This publication is not deemed to be valid for taxonomic/nomenclatural purposes. CONTENTS - Vol. 16, December 2010 2010 Officials and Committee …………………………………………………………………………………... 1 Minutes of the last AGM – 13 th December 2009 ………………………………………………………………... 2 Statement of Income & Expenditure for the Year Ending 31st December 2009 ……………………………….. 5 The Nautilus and the Ammonite - by Ken Brooks …………………….……………….……………………….. 6 Dinocochlea - ‘The Giant Gastropod Mystery’ - by Peter Austen ……………….……………………………... 11 Field trip to the Building Stones of Canterbury - by Trevor Devon …………………….………………………. 19 Coastal Erosion and Sea Defences in the Hastings area - by Siân Elder ………………………………………... 22 On Mantell, Buckland and Castle Hill, Newhaven - by Anthony Brook …………………….…………………. 32 From my Bookshelf - Book Reviews by Trevor Devon …………………….…………………………………... 34 What on Earth is under Sussex? - Book Review by Peter Austen …………………….……………………….... 35 Geology and Palaeontology in the News ………………………………………………………………………... 37 Extracts from ‘ Wealden News ’ - by Peter Austen ………………………………………………………………. 44 Geological Websites …………………………………………….………………………………………………. -
A Comparison of the Ammonite Faunas of the Antarctic Peninsula and Magallanes Basin
J. geol. Soc. London, Vol. 139, 1982, pp. 763-770, 1 fig, 1 table. Printed in Northern Ireland A comparison of the ammonite faunas of the Antarctic Peninsula and Magallanes Basin M. R. A. Thomson SUMMARY: Ammonite-bearingJurassic and Cretaceous sedimentary successions are well developed in the Antarctic Peninsula and the Magallanes Basin of Patagonia. Faunas of middle Jurassic-late Cretaceous age are present in Antarctica but those of Patagonia range no earlier than late Jurassic. Although the late Jurassic perisphinctid-dominated faunas of the Antarctic Peninsulashow wide-ranging Gondwana affinities, it is not yet possible to effect a close comparison with faunas of similar age in Patagonia because of the latter's poor preservation and our scant knowledge of them. In both regions the Neocomian is not well represented in the ammonite record, although uninterrupted sedimentary successions appear to be present. Lack of correspondence between the Aptian and Albian faunas of Alexander I. and Patagonia may be due to major differences in palaeogeographical setting. Cenomanian-Coniacian ammonite faunas are known only from Patagonia, although bivalve faunas indicate that rocks of this age are present in Antarctica. Kossmaticeratid faunas mark the late Cretaceous in both regions. In Antarcticathese have been classified as Campanian, whereas in Patagonia it is generally accepted, perhaps incorrectly, that these also range into the Maestrichtian. Fossiliferous Jurassic and Cretaceous marine rocks are rize first those of the Antarctic Peninsula and then to well developedin theAntarctic Peninsula, Scotia compare them with those of Patagonia. Comparisons Ridge andPatagonia (Fig. 1A).In Antarcticathese between Antarctic ammonite faunas and other Gond- rocks are distributed along the western and eastern wana areas wereoutlined by Thomson (1981a), and margins of theAntarctic Peninsula, formerly the the faunas of the marginal basin were discussed in magmatic arc from which the sediments were derived.