DOCSLIB.ORG

Isle of Wight

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Isle of Wight 5/9/2018 Local Government Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Isle of Wight Personal Details: Name: Linda Allen E-mail: Postcode: Organisation Name: these are my own personal comments Comment text: I live in the Bembridge, St Helens and Brading Ward, and at present there are two councillors who represent the three areas. This works very well with each councillor covering certain aspects of local government responsibilities, rather than area, and when one is away, the other covers, liaising with each other and the three Town and Parish Councils. I think the ward boundary should remain the same, with two ward councillors, as there are no large development proposals in the near future (as far as I am aware) which would compromise electoral equality. The three areas - Bembridge, St Helens and Brading, form a natural physical boundary, with the parish boundaries reflecting the perimeter of the Ward boundary. Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/12739 1/1 5/9/2018 Local Government Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Isle of Wight Personal Details: Name: Kevin Barclay-jay E-mail: Postcode: Organisation Name: Comment text: Combine Sandown Lake and Shanklin into the Bay Area and reduce councillors to 12 Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/12806 1/1 5/9/2018 Local Government Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Isle of Wight Personal Details: Name: Rosemary Cantwell E-mail: Postcode: Organisation Name: Comment text: I think the Wards are perfectly all right without any changes. It is good to have two Councillors for Brading, St Helens and Bembridge as it gives local residents opportunity to vote for two people who might have complementary strengths so that it helps the whole community. Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/12748 1/1 5/9/2018 Local Government Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Isle of Wight Personal Details: Name: Paul Coueslant E-mail: Postcode: Organisation Name: Comment text: I live in Sandown South. It seems completely wrong geographically to have the two Sandown wards named South and North. It would make more sense if they were renamed Sandown West and Sandown East. That part of the electoral map would then make more sense. Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/12779 1/1 5/14/2018 Local Government Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Isle of Wight Personal Details: Name: Janice Heppenstall E-mail: Postcode: Organisation Name: Comment text: street is split by the boundary between Lake South and Shanklin Central. This means that our house, on the north of the street, is in the Lake South ward. This makes no sense at all in terms of where we look for our community. We live in Shanklin, not Lake. The Lake boundary is further along the main road, where the railway bridge forms a natural boundary. This is where the Lake South ward boundary should be drawn. Wards should surely be based on town boundaries and natural borders, not drawn arbitrarily to make even numbers. Thank you. Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/12833 1/1 5/9/2018 Local Government Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Isle of Wight Personal Details: Name: Alison Langdon E-mail: Postcode: Organisation Name: Comment text: Leave Wroxall and Godshill as they are thank you! If it isn't broken, don't fix it. Plus we have the best Councillor on the Island representing us so why would we want change? As for the other Wards, plan them so there is a greater chance of the Tories losing control of County Hall so the Island will have a chance of moving forward and not being drowned by cuts. The Council is a shambles and is being run by out of touch, wannabe politicians - a definite time for change. Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/12826 1/1 5/10/2018 Local Government Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Isle of Wight Personal Details: Name: Martin Oliver E-mail: Postcode: Organisation Name: Comment text: Newport East should follow the main road & not cross in to Shide, Medina Avenue would come under Newport South Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/12827 1/1 Isle of Wight Personal Details: Name: Patricia Reeves E-mail: Postcode: Organisation Name: Comment text: I find it odd that a small proportion of properties on the south of Blackwater Road / St Georges Way should be within the Newport East Ward. I understand that the boundary runs up the middle of Shide Road and the middle of Medina Avenue. It would make better sense if the whole of the Shide area were brought within the same Newport South Ward. Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded 5/2/2018 Local Government Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Isle of Wight Personal Details: Name: ian thomson E-mail: Postcode: Organisation Name: Comment text: Get rid of one of them for Brading bembridgemail and St Helens. They are both useless.so to gethe rid of one would save money and would be no loss in any way. Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/12705 1/1 5/29/2018 Local Government Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Isle of Wight Personal Details: Name: Andrew John TURNER E-mail: Postcode: Organisation Name: Comment text: Where it is the case that most of the electoral divisions (wards) have one county councillor it should not be the case that one ward has two members. In the case of Bembridge, Brading and St Helens this is the only two-member ward, making the voters more likely to select two of any party (or two independents), rather than one from one party and the other from a second party. It may be acceptable with many similar wards, but it would not be acceptable with one two-member ward. The solution would be either (1) to have one ward for St Helens and Bembridge North and one for Brading and Bembridge South; OR (2) to have one ward for Bembridge Urban and the other being Bembridge Rural, Brading and St Helens. Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/12878 1/1 7/9/2018 Local Government Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Isle of Wight Personal Details: Name: Peter Wright E-mail: Postcode: Organisation Name: Comment text: Dear Sir/Madam Due to a landslide in 2013/4, ten properties to the West of St.Lawrence on the A3055, have had vehicular access severed from the designated electoral ward. I would therefore request that the boundary is reviewed so that these 10 or so properties are included in the ward of Niton. My reasons for the request are as follows: • Due to the landslide on the A3055 in 2013/4, vehicular access to our voting ward, St Lawrence has been cut off. • After 5 years, there are no concrete plans to reinstate vehicular access due to excessive cost and short design life. • We are consequently more socially, economically and geographically connected to the village of Niton. • Travel to the St Lawrence polling station by car ) now takes us on a round the houses route via two other polling stations; Niton and Whitwell before we would reach St Lawrence. • Isle of Wight Planning services already address us as ‘Undercliff Drive Niton’ not St Lawrence (see attached). • The road signs in both Niton and Ventnor all direct traffic to the East side of the closure for St Lawrence. A3055 road signs in Niton point to Niton Undercliff not St Lawrence. • The postcode PO38 1XY covers properties either side of the closed section of road which makes deliveries extremely difficult. If the road were to be reinstated, which is our preference, it would be logical for us to remain in St Lawrence but this is looking very unlikely. Kind regards Peter & Barbara Wright Documents: None Uploaded https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/13484 1/1.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ryde and the North-East Coastline (PDZ2)
    Isle of Wight Shoreline Management Plan 2: Main Report –Chapter 4 Isle of Wight Council & Royal Haskoning December 2010 4.3 Policy Development Zone 2 - Ryde and the North-east Coastline (PDZ2) Left to right: Seagrove Bay; Ryde Sands iwight.com - 109 - www.coastalwight.gov.uk/smp iwight.com - 110 - www.coastalwight.gov.uk/smp 4.3 Policy Development Zone 2 - Ryde and the North-east Coastline (PDZ2) Contents Page 4.3 Policy Development Zone 2 - Ryde and the North-east Coastline (PDZ2) 109 1. Overview and Description 113 2. Baseline management scenarios 122 3. Discussion and detailed policy development 136 4. Management Area Statements 139 Key facts: Policy Development Zone 2: includes the communities of Wootton, Fishbourne, Woodside, Ryde, Seaview, and Nettlestone. PDZ2 frontage = approx. 22km in length PDZ2 boundaries = From Old Castle Point (East Cowes) to Horestone Point (Nettlestone). As listed in SMP2 Appendices: areas IW2 to IW12 Old policies from SMP1 in 1997, reviewed in this chapter: Unit Location Length Policy RYD1 Old Castle Point to West 6091m Do nothing Woodside or Retreat the existing defence line RYD2 West Woodside to 1156m Retreat the existing defence line Chapelcorner Copse RYD3 Wootton Creek 4135m Hold the existing line RYD4 Fishbourne to Pelhamfield 2730m Retreat the existing defence line RYD5 Pelhamfiled to Puckpool 4180m Hold the existing defence line Hill RYD6 Puckpool Hill to Salterns 980m Hold the existing defence line Road, Seaview RYD7 Salterns Road to Pier 858m Hold the existing defence line Road Seaview RYD Pier Road Seaview to 740m Hold the existing defence line 7 Horestone Point iwight.com - 111 - www.coastalwight.gov.uk/smp iwight.com - 112 - www.coastalwight.gov.uk/smp 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Island Image Our Photo Competition Winner
    Your magazine from the Isle of Wight Council Issue two December 2006 oneIsland www.iwight.com The Island image our photo competition winner Also inside: Residents’ survey results The science of Dinosaur Isle Shaping up for 2007 Your magazine from t Isle of Wight Counci he l LKB Issue two December 2006 'PI>KAwww.iwight.co One Island is published six times a year, appearing in February, April, m Welcome June, August, October and December. If you have community news to share with other readers or would like to advertise in One Island, we would like to hear from you. We also welcome your letters – you can contact us by post, email or telephone. Post One Island, Publications, County Hall, Newport PO30 1UD The Island image Email [email protected] our photo competition winner Telephone 823105 Also inside: Residents’ survey results The science of Dinosaur Isle makingcontact Shaping up for 2007 USEFUL CONTACTS FACE TO FACE SERVICES Isle of Wight Council, County Hall, Newport Help Centre Newport PO30 1UD Tel 821000 Welcome to the second issue of Fax 823333 County Hall, Newport PO30 1UD the Isle of Wight Council’s new Email [email protected] Mon to Fri: 8am to 6pm Sat: 9am to 1pm magazine, One Island, and many Website www.iwight.com thanks to those who took the Ryde Help Centre TELEPHONE SERVICES time to send us their feedback Tel 812678 Call centre 821000 188 High Street, Ryde PO33 2PN about the first edition. Mon to Fri: 8.45am to 5pm Mon to Fri: 8am to 6pm Sat: 9.30am to 12.30pm It is our intention to develop Saturday: 9am to 1pm the magazine as a publication For telephone assistance we recommend Brading Help Centre which is not only informative you contact the call centre directly where Adult and children’s services Tel 405873 we aim to answer as many enquiries as Adult services 823340 for Island residents, but one West Street, Brading PO36 0DR possible at this first point of contact.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology, Landscape and Human Interactions: Examples from the Isle of Wight 1 2 K
    *Manuscript Click here to view linked References Geology, landscape and human interactions: Examples from the Isle of Wight 1 2 K. A. Booth 1, J. Brayson 1 3 4 1 5 British Geological Survey, Keyworth, Nottingham, NG12 5GG, UK. 6 7 Abstract: 8 9 The British Geological Survey has recently re-mapped the Isle of Wight at a scale of 1:10,000. This 10 11 has added to a wealth of geological research already published. Within this paper, we highlight the 12 importance of geology to the heritage of the Isle of Wight and its impacts on everyday life. There is 13 a growing cultural awareness of the variety of landscapes and resources, the geology that underpins 14 15 them, and the need to manage and understand them in a sensitive and sustainable way. 16 ‘Geodiversity’, which collectively embraces these themes, is defined as “…the natural range 17 (diversity) of geological (rocks, minerals, fossils), geomorphological (land form, processes) and soil 18 19 features…” (Gray, 2004). This paper will focus on the geomorphological features; that is, the link 20 between geology, the landscape it influences, and the human interactions with it. Examples from the 21 Isle of Wight of the influences of geology on landscape include the landslides at Ventnor; geotourism 22 23 at The Needles, Alum Bay and various dinosaur sites; and the artificial landscapes resulting from 24 resource extraction. The geological issues and examples that we have used are some of the most 25 26 applicable to everyday life, and therefore ones that many people will be able to relate to, such as 27 geohazards (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Isle of Wight Shoreline Management Plan 2 Appendix C: Baseline
    Directorate of Economy & Environment Director Stuart Love Isle of Wight Shoreline Management Plan 2 Appendix C: Baseline Process Understanding C3: Baseline Scenarios (of future shoreline change) • No Active Intervention scenario • With Present Management scenario December 2010 Coastal Management; Directorate of Economy & Environment, Isle of Wight Council iwight.com Appendix C3: Page 1 www.coastalwight.gov.uk/smp iwight.com Appendix C3: Page 2 www.coastalwight.gov.uk/smp Appendix C: Baseline Process Understanding C3: Baseline Scenarios (of future shoreline change) • No Active Intervention (NAI) scenario • With Present Management (WPM) scenario Contents Page no. C3.1 Introduction and Methodology 3 1. Context 2. Aim and introduction 3. Geographical units (including a map of the units used in the tables) 4. Introduction to the Baseline Scenarios 5. Sea level rise 6. Methodology 6.1 Developing the ‘No Active Intervention’ and ‘With Present Management’ Scenarios 6.2 Future erosion risk -Allowing for sea level rise in the future predictions of coastal erosion rates 6.3 Future flood risk 6.4 Mapping of predicted shoreline change under the ‘No Active Intervention’ and ‘With Present Management’ Scenarios -Assumptions for mapping erosion zones in the Baseline Scenarios 7. Overall Conclusions 7.1 No Active Intervention 7.2 With Present Management 8. Key sources of reference used in the development of the Baseline Scenarios & Maps. C3.2 Table: North-east coast 21 C3.3 Table: Sandown & Undercliff coast 68 C3.4 Table: West Wight coast 114 C3.5 Maps: NAI & WPM erosion and flood mapping iwight.com Appendix C3: Page 3 www.coastalwight.gov.uk/smp iwight.com Appendix C3: Page 4 www.coastalwight.gov.uk/smp 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Brading Neighbourhood Development Plan 2015 - 2027 Contents Page
    Brading Neighbourhood Development Plan 2015 - 2027 Contents Page Acknowledgements 2 1 Foreword 5 2 Introduction 6 3 Designated Area 7 4 The Planning Process 8 5 A Vision for Brading 10 6 Objectives of the Plan 11 7 Local Character and History 13 8 Housing 17 9 Heritage 20 10 Jobs and the Local Economy 23 11 Protecting our Environment 26 12 Creating a Sustainable Community 28 13 Crime and Disorder 32 14 Improving Community Services 33 15 Traffic and Transportation 34 16 Proposals Map 35 Supporting Documents 1 Implementation Plan 2 Heritage Design Statement Information for developers 3 Historic Environment and Climate Change 4 Heritage Audit 5 Heritage Asset Renovation Report 6 Design Statement Information for developers 7 Consultation Statement 8 Basic Conditions Statement 9 Sustainability Appraisal 10 Habitat Regulations Report 11 Equality Impact Assessment 12 Residents’ Survey 2013 13 Housing Needs Survey Report 14 Local Green Spaces and Important Views 15 Primary Business Frontage Survey 16 Glossary of Terms 1 Acknowledgements Deb Gardiner, Mayor of Brading Town Council Brading Town Council is very pleased to launch the public consultation on the Brading Neighbourhood Development Plan. Developing this plan has been a long process, involving so many community groups, businesses and individuals and we hope that this next stage will give even more people a chance to have their say on the future of Brading. The Town Council is proud to have been involved in the project right from the beginning, with a successful bid for funding and with our Town Clerk, Sue Chilton, taking a lead role in its development.
    [Show full text]
  • Initial LCWIP
    Contents 3 Executive summary 4 Introduction 5 Background Isle of Wight: cycling and walking 6 Local cycling and walking infrastructure plans Local cycling and walking infrastructure plans – process 8 Stage 1 – geographical scope 9 Stage 2 – gathering information National walking cycling statistics Isle of Wight Council travel behaviour change programmes 15 Stage 3 – network planning for cycling Identifying trip origin and destinations The cycle route selection process Newport cycling route proposals Route summary Route summary 23 Stage 4 – network planning for Walking Identifying key walking routes and core walking zones Route selection and auditing Newport walking routes Route summary Ryde walking routes Route summary 31 Stage 5 – action plan 32 Stage 6 – action plan Executive summary In 2017 the Government published its first Cycling and 24 walking routes and zones, which if and Walking Strategy (CWIS), setting out an implemented, will lead to a transformation in ambition to make cycling and walking the natural volumes of cycling and walking in Newport and choice for shorter journeys, or as key stages Ryde, in line with the ambition of the CWIS. within longer journeys. This LCWIP process sets out how we work towards The CWIS references ambitious targets for delivering ambitious plans to increase walking and increasing cycling and walking, including: cycling opportunities across the Isle of Wight. The to aim to double cycling, where cycling activity is plan will help support the delivery of planning measured as the estimated total number of cycle policy, regeneration plans, health and wellbeing stages made each year, from 0.8 billion stages in policy, and Island’s emerging climate and 2013 to 1.6 billion stages in 2025; environment strategy supporting the Island going to aim to increase walking activity, where walking carbon neutral by 2035.
    [Show full text]
  • Ventnor and the Undercliff (PDZ4)
    Isle of Wight Shoreline Management Plan 2: Main Report –Chapter 4 Isle of Wight Council & Royal Haskoning December 2010 4.5 Policy Development Zone 4 – Ventnor and the Undercliff (PDZ4) Above: The town of Ventnor developed on the terraces of a landslide complex (Isle of Wight Council). iwight.com - 207 - www.coastalwight.gov.uk/smp iwight.com - 208 - www.coastalwight.gov.uk/smp 4.5 Policy Development Zone 4 – Ventnor and the Undercliff (PDZ4) Contents Page 4.5 Policy Development Zone 4 – Ventnor and the Undercliff (PDZ4) 207 1. Overview and Description 211 2. Baseline management scenarios 220 3. Discussion and detailed policy development 231 4. Management Area Statements 235 Key facts: Policy Development Zone 4: includes the communities of Bonchurch, Ventnor, St. Lawrence, Niton and Blackgang. PDZ4 frontage = approximately 14km in length PDZ4 boundaries = Includes the Ventnor Undercliff landslide complex, from Luccombe Chine in the east to Chale Terrace (near Blackgang) in the east. As listed in SMP2 Appendices: areas IW29 to IW39 Old policies from SMP1 in 1997, reviewed in this chapter: Unit Location Length Policy VEN1 Horse Ledge to Monks Bay 2335m Retreat the existing defence line VEN2 Monks Bay to Steephill Cove 3541m Hold the existing defence line VEN3 Steephill Cove to East of Binnel Bay 3076m Retreat the existing defence line VEN4 East of Binnel Bay to Puckaster Point 1334m Retreat the existing defence line VEN5 Puckaster Point to West of Castlehaven 824m Hold the existing defence line VEN6 West of Castlehaven to St Catherine’s 824m Do nothing Point FRE1 St Catherine’s Point to Brook Chine 14391m Do nothing (part) (part) iwight.com - 209 - www.coastalwight.gov.uk/smp iwight.com - 210 - www.coastalwight.gov.uk/smp 1.
    [Show full text]
  • ADAPTING to COASTAL FLOODING in the YARMOUTH AREA in the 21St CENTURY
    ADAPTING TO COASTAL FLOODING in the YARMOUTH AREA in the 21st CENTURY A Report by Yarmouth Coastal Defence Working Group December 2010 Adapting to Coastal Flooding in the Yarmouth Area in the 21st Century ADAPTING TO COASTAL FLOODING in the st YARMOUTH AREA in the 21 CENTURY A Report by Yarmouth Coastal Defence Working Group December 2010 SUMMARY Much of the town of Yarmouth and the surrounding area lie only a couple of metres above mean sea level. Every twenty years or so the coincidence of a Storm Surge with a high Spring Tide brings the sea over the harbour wall and causes flooding. To date the effects of such flooding have been minor but, with sea level predicted to rise at increasing rates in the coming century, flooding will become more serious and more frequent. This Report, prepared by a local working group, assesses the increasing impact that flooding is likely to have as the 21st Century progresses. It outlines the scientific basis for concern and attempts to identify the local assets at risk from flooding. Possible options for coastal defence in the future are suggested and approximate costs are estimated. At this stage no particular expenditure is advocated. Competition for funding will be intense for both Yarmouth within the Isle of Wight Council‟s strategy and for the Island within the national context. Ongoing research into rising sea levels will clarify the situation and determine what and when specific coastal defence projects will be required. The purpose of the Report is to raise the issues for discussion with policy makers and the local community.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the ACCESS Project Report
    good practice guide 2.1.qxp 29/07/2011 10:56 Page 1 Adapting to Coastal Change along England's Southern Shorelines SCOPAC 'ACCESS' Study good practice guide 2.1.qxp 29/07/2011 10:56 Page 2 The SCOPAC 'ACCESS' research project has been prepared through collaboration between: • Coastal and Geotechnical Services Professor Robin McInnes OBE Ms Hope Stubbings Ms Jennifer Samuelson • Channel Coastal Observatory Professor Andrew Bradbury Dr Samantha Cope Ms Charlotte Millerchip • Halcrow Group Ltd Professor Roger Moore Suggested citation: McInnes, R.G., Cope, S.N., Moore, R., Bradbury, A.P. and Millerchip, C.J. 2011. 'Adapting to Coastal Change along England's Southern Shorelines (ACCESS)'. Report for SCOPAC, 64pps. PHOTO CREDITS Cover photos, I.1,I.2,I.3,I.4,I.5,d.2: Wight Light Gallery; d.3: Robin McInnes; d.4,g.3,g.4: Roger Moore; k.2,k.3: West Dorset District Council. All other images: Channel Coast Observatory or as credited. Copyright © Standing Conference on Problems Associated with the Coastline (SCOPAC). July 2011 www.scopac.org.uk This guide is intended to provide practical assistance to its readers and information contained within the guide may be reproduced with the permission of SCOPAC. For permissions to reproduce extracts from this publication, please visit www.scopac.org.uk Figure I.1: Entrance to Portsmouth Harbour good practice guide 2.1.qxp 29/07/2011 10:56 Page 3 Table of Contents Executive Summary 5 Introduction 7 Chapter 1 Understanding coastal change in central southern England 11 Chapter 2 SCOPAC 'Hotspot' case studies
    [Show full text]
  • Directorate of Environment and Neighbourhoods
    APPENDIX A Isle of Wight Shoreline Management Plan 2: Main Report –Chapter 4 Isle of Wight Council & Royal Haskoning December 2010 4.7 Policy Development Zone 6 – West Wight (PDZ6) Above: Freshwater Bay, with the low lying land of the Western Yar Estuary extending southwards towards the south coast of the Isle of Wight; View of the Needles headland at the western tip of the Isle of Wight (Isle of Wight Council). iwight.com - 267 - www.coastalwight.gov.uk/smp iwight.com - 268 - www.coastalwight.gov.uk/smp 4.7 Policy Development Zone 6 – West Wight (PDZ6) Contents Page 4.7 Policy Development Zone 6 – West Wight (PDZ6) 267 1. Overview and Description 271 2. Baseline management scenarios 281 3. Discussion and detailed policy development 292 4. Management Area Statements 297 Key facts: Policy Development Zone 6: includes the communities of Freshwater, Alum Bay, Totland, Colwell, Yarmouth and Port la Salle. PDZ6 frontage = approximately 27km in length PDZ6 boundaries = From the eastern margin of Freshwater around the west Wight headland to include Yarmouth (to the eastern margin of Port la Salle). As listed in SMP2 Appendices: areas IW41 to IW51 Old policies from SMP1 in 1997, reviewed in this chapter: Unit Location Length Policy FRE 4 Freshwater Bay 697m Hold the existing defence line FRE 5 Freshwater Bay to the Needles 5607m Do nothing TOT 1 South Alum Bay 1269m Do nothing TOT 2 South-east Alum Bay to Totland West 2466m Do nothing TOT 3 West Totland to Colwell Chine 1871m Hold the existing defence line TOT 4 Colwell Chine to Fort Albert 1506m Retreat the existing defence line NEW1 Fort Albert to Fort Victoria 835m Do nothing NEW2 Fort Victoria to Norton Spit 1149m Hold the existing defence line NEW3 Yarmouth Harbour 2834m Hold the existing defence line NEW4 Royal Solent Yacht Club to the 320m Hold the existing defence line Common, Yarmouth NEW5 The Common, Yarmouth to Bouldnor 1390m Hold the existing defence line iwight.com - 269 - www.coastalwight.gov.uk/smp iwight.com - 270 - www.coastalwight.gov.uk/smp 1.
    [Show full text]
  • HAMPSHIRE Extracted from the Database of the Milestone Society 1
    Entries in red - require a photograph HAMPSHIRE Extracted from the database of the Milestone Society National IID Grid Reference Road No. Parish Location Position HA_ALBO17 SU 5797 2004 B3035 EXTON Corhampton Down in hedge line on opp side of road 50m E of entrance to Hazel Holt HA_ALBO20 SU 5490 1675 B3035 BISHOPS WALTHAM Thickess HoUse deeply bUried in hedge line opp entrance to Locks Farm HA_ALBO21 SU 5387 1553 B3035 SHEDFIELD BUngalow, by PAWS boarding kennels by the road HA_ALBO22 SU 5312 1411 B3035 CURDRIDGE opp. Woolam's Cottage by the road HA_ANAM01 SU 3481 4559 B3402 PENTON GRAFTON Sports GroUnd on grass verge oUtside 101 Weyhill Road HA_ANAM05 SU 2905 4550 UC road (was A303) CHOLDERTON ThrUxton Village; opp. hoUse named Gosling on small green Under tree HA_ANAM08 SU 2444 4385 UC road CHOLDERTON ThrUxton Farm next to road half way Up hill HA_ANDE03 SU 3175 4662 A342 PENTON GRAFTON Weyhill Road, Weyhill on grass verge oUtside chUrch HA_ANDE04 SU 3037 4731 A342 PENTON GRAFTON Fyfield Lane on grass verge west of the jUnction of Andover Road with Fyflield Lane HA_ANDE05 SU 2928 4851 A342 FYFIELD East Lodge on grass verge in front of a row of trees HA_ANDE06 SU 2845 4980 A342 FYFIELD Andover Lane Farm wide on grass verge in front of a hedge HA_ANHU02 SU 3499 4782 UC road CHARLTON Old NUrsery Cottage in hedge 100m before lay-by on east of road HA_ANSA01 SU 3487 4468 UC road &OVER SalisbUry Road by the road HA_ANSA02 SU 3372 4358 A343 ABBOTTS ANN Gilberts Mead by the road HA_ANSA04 SU 3197 4099 A343 ABBOTTS ANN Down Farm by the road HA_ANSA05 SU 3067 4002 A343 OVER WALLOP Kentsboro by the road HA_ANSA06 SU 2971 3873 A343 OVER WALLOP Middle Wallop Airfield by the road HA_ANSA07 SU 2858 3761 A343 NETHER WALLOP SUddern Farm by the road HA_ANSA09 SU 2575 3610 A343 NETHER WALLOP Little Firs Farm by the road HA_BAAL01 SU 6435 5037 A339 WINSLADE Bothy in tree screen HA_BAAL07 SU 6757 4238 UC road HERRIARD Lasham on grass verge at road jUnction HA_BAAL08 SU 6821 4144 A339 LASHAM Wadgetts Copse, opp.
    [Show full text]
  • West Wight Coastal Flood and Erosion Risk Management Plan
    West Wight Coastal Flood and Erosion Risk Management Strategy MAIN STRATEGY DOCUMENT DRAFT FOR CONSULTATION MARCH 2016 This Strategy was produced for Isle of Wight Council with technical assistance from the engineering and environmental consultant CAPITA | AECOM. This project was funded by the Environment Agency from Flood and Coastal Risk Management Grant-in-Aid. Photos (C) Isle of Wight Council 2016 (& pages cover, 56, 95, 128, 163 & 168 courtesy of S.Lee) Contents 28 Potentially contaminated land 6 GLOSSARY AND ACRONYMS 31 Environment and heritage designations 31 Stakeholder engagement - understanding what people want from the coast CHAPTER 1 8 INTRODUCTION 32 Summary of the existing defences 33 Option development 12 Strategy objectives 35 Strategy Management Zones 13 The shoreline management planning hierarchy 43 Strategic Options 14 The need for a strategic approach 45 Strategic Option Appraisal 16 Purpose and structure of this document 17 Supporting information CHAPTER 4 48 OVERVIEW CHAPTER 2 19 WHAT IS AT RISK IF WE DO NOTHING? 50 A phased approach to management based on risk 52 Links with the planning process and redevelopment 21 Why we need the Strategy - what is at risk if 52 Environmental impacts summary we 'Do Nothing' 22 Sea level rise and increasing risk CHAPTER 5 56 STRATEGY MANAGEMENT ZONE 1 CHAPTER 3 24 HOW THE STRATEGY HAS BEEN DEVELOPED Needles Headland Fort Redoubt to southern limit of Totland Bay 26 Overview of the study area - key features, issues and opportunities 58 Baseline - what would happen if we did nothing?
    [Show full text]