DOCSLIB.ORG

Urgent Resolution on the On-Going Crackdown by the Malaysian Government Against Malaysians

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Urgent Resolution on the On-Going Crackdown by the Malaysian Government Against Malaysians URGENT RESOLUTION ON THE ON-GOING CRACKDOWN BY THE MALAYSIAN GOVERNMENT AGAINST MALAYSIANS The members leagues of FIDH condemn the ongoing crackdown on human rights defenders and ordinary members of the public in Malaysia that began on 18 May 2013 and has escalated just as FIDH is holding its 38th Congress in Istanbul. This crackdown is apparently aimed at stamping out opposition to election fraud and violence during the recent general election. The crackdown it has so far, featured murder, violence, arbitrary arrests, hate speech, disruption of peaceful assemblies and censorship on media targeting human rights defenders and opposition leaders, as well as selective deployment of laws that contravene international human rights standards. Background Malaysia’s 13th General Elections (“GE13”) concluded on 5th May 2013. Arguably the most intense election in Malaysian history, the election period saw heightened political violence namely bomb blasts at campaign sites, a murder of an Opposition campaigner and various forms of harassment of human rights defenders and opposition leaders. The outcome of the GE13 was marred with electoral fraud, phantom voters, irregularities of the electoral roll and the indelible ink which was not indelible. FIDH notes that opposition parties are in the midst of filing 27 Election Petitions to the High Court challenging the results and paving way for by-elections in the constituents and affected seats. This challenge is taking place in tandem with public denunciations of the Election Commission’s (“EC”) for its contradictory responses to legitimate complaints of vote rigging which comprised both blanket denials AND mild promises to investigate complaints. The crackdown on legitimate dissent The authorities have used repressive legislations namely the Sedition Act 1948, the Peaceful Assembly Act 2012, the Penal Code and the Printing Presses and Publications Act 1984 as tools to suppress legitimate dissent of voters, human rights defenders, and leaders of the Opposition while government-friendly individuals remain unscathed despite their racist and seditious statements. Sedition Act 1948 The Sedition Act 1948 was invoked against a student activist, Adam Adli, 24 for having allegedly uttered seditious words under Section 4(1) (b) of the Act on 23rd May 2013. On 23/5/2013, social movement Anything But UMNO’s Haris Ibrahim, Parti Keadilan Rakyat’s (“PKR”) MP for Batu, Chua Tian Chang and Parti Islam Se-Malaysia’s (“PAS”) MP for Batu Berendam, Tamrin Ghafar were arrested under the Sedition Act 1948 for alleged breach of the Act. Peaceful Assemby Act 2012 On 14/5/2013, PKR’s Seri Setia Assemblyperson Nik Nazmi Nik Ahmad and PKR’s MP for Pandan Rafizi Ramli were questioned by the police under the unconstitutional Peaceful Assembly Act 2012 under Section 9(1) for failing to provide a 10-day notice required under the Act. Nik Nazmi was charged under the Act on 17/5/2013. Penal Code On 22/5/2012, 18 individuals who attended a nightly candle light vigil for Adam Adli were arrested for allegedly violating Section 143 of the Penal Code for participation in an illegal assembly. The police had denied the arrested persons’ right to legal counsel provided for under the S28A of the Criminal Procedure Code and Article 5(3) of the Federal Constitution. After a lengthy protest by the lawyers, they were only allowed to provide legal advice to their clients. However, they were not allowed to represent their clients during police questioning. Democratic Action Party’s (“DAP”) MP for Serdang, Ong Kian Meng was subjected to questioning under Section 505 of the Penal Code for allegedly uttering statements tantamount to public mischief. Even DAP’s adviser and founding member, Dr Chen Man Hin was investigated over an email sent in 2012 which had been alleged to be linked to the Malaysia’s version of “Arab Spring”. Violence from pro-Barisan Nasional groups Violence erupted in Penang on at least two occasions. On 9th May 2013, a group of multiracial students intending to hand over an anti-racism memorandum was attacked by a group of racist mobs hurling racist and derogatory remarks to them. Similarly, supporters who had held a candle light vigil for Adam Adli were physically attacked by an unknown group of mobs who had informed the police and falsely accused the supporters for possessing weapons including hand guns. On 22nd May, SUARAM Penang’s Sean Ho and student group DEMA’s Saw Jia Ying were hit by motorcycles after being chased by the bike gang for some distance. Many supporters suffered bodily injuries. Seditious statements Seditious statements from public officials continue to be tolerated by the government. On 12/5/2013, former Court of Appeal Judge Mohd Noor Abdullah (now a commissioner for the Malaysian Anti- Corruption Commission) had warned that the Chinese Malaysians must be prepared for a backlash from the Malay community for their betrayal in the recently concluded GE13. He had made the seditious statements in an event organised by UiTM Malaysia’s Alumni Association and Gabungan Pelajar Melayu Semenanjung (The Coalition of Peninsular Malay Students), titled “GE13 Post-Mortem Muslim Leadership and Survival”. He stated, “…The Chinese betrayal towards the Malay’s hand of friendship – that is true. Because they plotted to seize political power even though they already have economic power… for the Malays, the taboo is to be betrayed, because when they are betrayed, they will react and when they react, their dendam kesumat tidak tersudah-sudah (wrath will be endless)…When Malays are betrayed, there is a backlash and the Chinese must bear the consequences of a Malay backlash…” He had reportedly suggested that key sectors such as education, civil service and businesses must have a two third allocation (67%) for the Malays to be taken up at any time. He added that the terms “Chinese” and “Indian” should be replaced with Non-Malays as they are just our (Malay) neighbours and they had just come to stay ( i.e they are not really Malaysian). The silence and inactions from the government against the former judge were unacceptable as the statements were clearly racist and seditious. The approach was clearly different than those undertaken by the police against Adam Adli, Haris Ibrahim, Chua Tian Chang and Tamrin Ghafar. Censorship and Seizing of Publications Thousands of copies of PAS’ Harakah, PKR’s Suara Keadilan and DAP’s The Rocket were seized in several States. Officers from the Home Ministry had not only seized the publications but also raided the vendors’ stalls. In a statement by the Home Minister, he had alleged that the Opposition’s publications had violated Section 5 of the Printing Presses and Publications Act 1984 namely for distribution to non-party members. The publications were never subjected to such condition in the past and the recent revelation from the Home Minister appears to be another attempt to restrict freedom of information. In contrast to Utusan Malaysia’s seditious 7/5/2013 front page article titled “Apa Lagi Cina Mahu?” (What else do the Chinese want?) and Prime Minister Najib’s comments which had likened the outcome of the election to a “Chinese Tsunami” (that together implied that the country was hostage to unreasonable demands of the ethnic Chinese) , the newspaper was not seized or banned. To date, neither Utusan Malaysia nor Prime Minister Najib have apologised and retracted their statements. Actions requested: We therefore urge the Malaysian authorities to perform the following:- 1. To abolish the Sedition Act 1948 and drop all charges against Adam Adli and immediately release Chua Tian Chang, Haris Ibrahim and Tamrin Ghafar; 2. To Abolish the Peaceful Assembly Act 2012 and drop all charges against Nik Nazmi and end all investigations against individuals alleged to have violated the Act; 3. To immediately cease invoking repressive legislations to suppress legitimate dissent; 4. To promote and protect the fundamental rights of individuals and associates to strive for the protection and realisation of human rights and fundamental freedoms; 5. To promote and protect every individual’s right to participate in peaceful activities against violations of human rights and fundamental freedoms; 6. To promote and encourage respect for and observance of human rights and fundamental freedoms for all without distinction as to race, religion, sex or national origin; 7. To consider that all human beings are equal before the law and are entitled to equal protection of the law against any discrimination and against any incitement to discrimination; 8. To acknowledge that discrimination between races is an obstacle to friendly and peaceful relations capable of disturbing peace and security among the people and that racial barriers is repugnant to the ideals of any human society; 9. To speedily eliminate racial discrimination in all its form and manifestations in order to promote a society free from all forms of racial segregation and racial discrimination; 10. To comply and uphold the fundamental freedoms enshrined under the Federal Constitution; and 11. To comply and uphold the provisions in the United Nations Declaration on Human Rights Defenders1 in particular Articles 5, 6, 9, 10, 11,18 and the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination in particular Articles 2(1)(a)2, 2(1)(b)3 and 4(c)4. 1 http://olddoc.ishr.ch/hrdo/documents/DeclarationHRD.pdf 12. To the UN due to review of UPR Malaysia in October 2013- To continue to grant particular attention to the protection of human rights in Malaysia in accordance with the UN Declaration of Human Rights, International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), International covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR) UN Declaration of Human Rights Defenders and follow up on the implementation on the recommendations issued to Malaysia in its Universal Periodic Review in 2009.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Malaysia 120613
    PRESS RELEASE MALAYSIA: Immediately release and drop charges against activists and political opponents in the framework of the crackdown of post-election rallies! Geneva, 12 June 2013. The World Organisation Against Torture (OMCT) expresses its concern about the crackdown that has followed Malaysia’s 13th General Elections, which led to the arrest of and charges against several civil society activists and political opponents. The continuing wave of repression of peaceful dissenters as well as the numerous acts of police brutality all point to a continuing, serious deterioration in the Malaysian government’s respect for human rights, basic freedoms and the rule of law. On 5 May 2013, Malaysia’s 13th General Elections concluded, marred with electoral fraud and irregularities. Subsequently, several peaceful “Blackout 505” rallies were organised to protest the results in many parts of Malaysia. On 18 May 2013, a crackdown started against civil society activists and political opponents who organised or took part in such rallies. Most recently, on 28 May 2013 in the evening, Mr. Haris Ibrahim, a social activist member of the movement “Anything but UMNO”, Mr. Mohammad Safwan Anang, a student activist, Mr. Tamrin bin Abdul Ghafar and Mr. Chua Tian Chang, both opposition members of the Parliament of Malaysia, were arrested and taken to the Dang Wangi Police Station in Kuala Lumpur. On 29 May 2013, they were charged under Section 4 (1) (b) of the Sedition Act 1948 at the Kuala Lumpur High Court in relation to speeches they made during the public gathering on 13 May 2013, one of the rallies organised in the framework of the “Blackout 505” peaceful protests.
    [Show full text]
  • Provisional List of Cases Session N° 157, 13-17/10/2018
    Committee on the Human Rights of Parliamentarians Provisional list of cases Session N° 157, 13-17/10/2018 The country name indicated below is that of the Parliament of which the parliamentarian is a member. In cases where more than one country is allegedly involved, the names of all relevant countries are indicated. Africa 1 Democratic Rep. Congo COD-71 COD-71 Eugène Diomi Ndongala 2 Democratic Rep. Congo COD-72 COD-72 Dieudonné Bakungu Mythondeke 3 Democratic Rep. Congo COD-86 COD-86 Franck Diongo 4 Mauritania MRT-02 MRT-02 Mohamed Ould Ghadda 5 Senegal SEN-07 SEN-07 CONFIDENTIAL CASE (1 MP) 6 Uganda UGA-COLL-01 UGA-19 CONFIDENTAL CASE (5 MPs) Americas 1 Venezuela VEN-COLL-06 VEN-10 Biagio Pilieri VEN-11 José Sánchez Montiel VEN-12 Hernán Alemán VEN-13 Richard Blanco VEN-16 Julio Borges VEN-19 Nora Bracho VEN-20 Ismael Garcia VEN-22 William Dávila VEN-24 Nirma Guarulla VEN-25 Julio Ygarza VEN-26 Romel Guzamana VEN-27 Rosmit Mantilla VEN-28 Enzo Prieto VEN-29 Gilberto Sojo VEN-30 Gilber Caro VEN-31 Luis Florido VEN-32 Eudoro González VEN-33 Jorge Millán VEN-34 Armando Armas VEN-35 Américo De Grazia VEN-36 Luis Padilla VEN-37 José Regnault VEN-38 Dennis Fernández VEN-39 Olivia Lozano VEN-40 Delsa Solórzano VEN-41 Robert Alcalá VEN-42 Gaby Arellano VEN-43 Carlos Bastardo VEN-44 Marialbert Barrios VEN-45 Amelia Belisario VEN-46 Marco Bozo VEN-47 José Brito VEN-48 Yanet Fermin VEN-49 Dinorah Figuera VEN-50 Winston Flores VEN-51 Omar González VEN-52 Stalin González VEN-53 Juan Guaidó VEN-54 Tomás Guanipa VEN-55 José Guerra VEN-56 Freddy Guevara VEN-57 Rafael Guzmán VEN-58 María G.
    [Show full text]
  • 23 November 2016
    Bil. 52 Rabu 23 November 2016 MALAYSIA PENYATA RASMI PARLIMEN DEWAN RAKYAT PARLIMEN KETIGA BELAS ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Diterbitkan oleh: PENGGAL KEEMPAT CAWANGAN PENYATA RASMI PARLIMEN MALAYSIA MESYUARAT KETIGA 2016 K A N D U N G A N JAWAPAN-JAWAPAN LISAN BAGI PERTANYAAN-PERTANYAAN (Halaman 1) RANG UNDANG-UNDANG DIBAWA KE DALAM MESYUARAT (Halaman 20) USUL MENTERI DI JABATAN PERDANA MENTERI DI BAWAH P.M.27(3): Menggantung Yang Berhormat Segambut Daripada Perkhidmatan Majlis Mesyuarat Selama Enam Bulan (Halaman 21) RANG UNDANG-UNDANG: Rang Undang-undang Kewangan 2016 (Halaman 25) Rang Undang-undang Kesalahan Yang Berhubungan Dengan Anugerah 2016 (Halaman 58) Rang Undang-undang Lambang dan Nama (Mencegah Penggunaan Tak Wajar)(Pindaan) 2016 (Halaman 82) Rang Undang-undang Pentadbiran Undang-undang Islam (Wilayah-wilayah Persekutuan)(Pindaan) 2016 (Halaman 83) Rang Undang-undang Pendaftaran Kelahiran dan Kematian (Pindaan) 20 (Halaman 100) Rang Undang-undang Pihak Berkuasa Penerbangan Awam Malaysia 2016 (Halaman 119) Rang Undang-undang Penerbangan Awam (Pindaan) 2016 (Halaman 138) USUL-USUL: Waktu Mesyuarat dan Urusan Dibebaskan Daripada Peraturan Mesyuarat (Halaman 20) Meminda Susunan Aturan Urusan Mesyuarat (Halaman 45) Menangguhkan Bacaan Kali Yang Kedua dan Ketiga Rang Undang-undang (Halaman 142) ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Diterbitkan oleh: CAWANGAN PENYATA RASMI PARLIMEN MALAYSIA 2016 DR 23.11.2016 i AHLI-AHLI DEWAN RAKYAT 1. Yang Berhormat Tuan Yang di-Pertua, Tan Sri Datuk Seri Panglima Pandikar Amin Haji Mulia, P.S.M., S.P.D.K., S.U.M.W., P.G.D.K., J.S.M., J.P. 2. “ Timbalan Yang di-Pertua, Datuk Seri Dr. Ronald Kiandee, P.G.D.K., A.S.D.K.
    [Show full text]
  • 1930 1435218997 G1511786.Pdf
    United Nations A/HRC/29/NGO/87 General Assembly Distr.: General 9 June 2015 English only Human Rights Council Twenty-ninth session Agenda item 3 Promotion and protection of all human rights, civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights, including the right to development Written statement* submitted by the Aliran Kesedaran Negara National Consciousness Movement, non- governmental organization on the roster The Secretary-General has received the following written statement which is circulated in accordance with Economic and Social Council resolution 1996/31. [25 May 2015] * This written statement is issued, unedited, in the language(s) received from the submitting non-governmental organization(s). GE.15-09265 (E) A/HRC/29/NGO/87 Crackdown on freedom of expression and assembly in Malaysia There has been a serious regression in Malaysia's democratic space in 2015, with the government's crackdown on freedom of speech and assembly, predominantly through the use of the Sedition Act 1948, Peaceful Assembly Act 2012, and various sections of the Penal Code. Freedom of speech and expression is enshrined in Article 10(1)(a) of the Federal Constitution of Malaysia. However, the guarantee of such a right is severely limited and qualified by broad provisions in Article 10(2)(a), which stipulates that Parliament may impose “such restrictions as it deems necessary or expedient in the interest of the security of the Federation or any part thereof”. Similarly, the freedom of assembly is enshrined in Article 10(1)(b) of the Constitution, but is restricted through Article 10(2), 10(4) and Article 149 of the Constitution.
    [Show full text]
  • Anwar Ibrahim
    - 8 - CL/198/12(b)-R.1 Lusaka, 23 March 2016 Malaysia MAL/15 - Anwar Ibrahim Decision adopted by consensus by the IPU Governing Council at its 198 th session (Lusaka, 23 March 2016) 2 The Governing Council of the Inter-Parliamentary Union, Referring to the case of Dato Seri Anwar Ibrahim, a member of the Parliament of Malaysia, and to the decision adopted by the Governing Council at its 197 th session (October 2015), Taking into account the information provided by the leader of the Malaysian delegation to the 134 th IPU Assembly (March 2016) and the information regularly provided by the complainants, Recalling the following information on file: - Mr. Anwar Ibrahim, Finance Minister from 1991 to 1998 and Deputy Prime Minister from December 1993 to September 1998, was dismissed from both posts in September 1998 and arrested on charges of abuse of power and sodomy. He was found guilty on both counts and sentenced, in 1999 and 2000 respectively, to a total of 15 years in prison. On 2 September 2004, the Federal Court quashed the conviction in the sodomy case and ordered Mr. Anwar Ibrahim’s release, as he had already served his sentence in the abuse of power case. The IPU had arrived at the conclusion that the motives for Mr. Anwar Ibrahim’s prosecution were not legal in nature and that the case had been built on a presumption of guilt; - Mr. Anwar Ibrahim was re-elected in August 2008 and May 2013 and became the de facto leader of the opposition Pakatan Rakyat (The People’s Alliance); - On 28 June 2008, Mohammed Saiful Bukhari Azlan, a former male aide in Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Publication
    Columbia Jurisprudence Conference Jurisprudence & Freedom of Expression in Malaysia By HR Dipendra OVERVIEW 2015 IN A NUTSHELL: 2015 has been inundated with a deluge of administrative clamp downs to the constitutional right of freedom of expression in Malaysia. Innocuous solecism and mordant comic strips were the subject of criminal prosecution. A number of activists, lawyers, editors, and students were arrested, remanded and/or prosecuted for expressing their opinions over Twitter, articles, and through cartoons. The Home Minister had issued a total of 28 Printing Presses and Publications (Control of Undesirable Publications) Orders in the same year banning the circulation of a total of 47 books, amongst others, 3 books by the cartoonist, Zunar as well as “Any yellow coloured clothing and which contains the words ‘Bersih 4’” and “Any other printed material and pamphlets which leads to Bersih 4 Rally”. Suspension orders were issued to two publications under the wing of The Edge Media Group. On an unprecedented move, the Inspector General of Police (IGP) of Malaysia took on the role of active policing and monitoring over social media platform, in particular, on Twitter. As aptly put by Human Rights Watch's Asia deputy director, Phil Robertson, the IGP "patrols the Twittersphere like a shark in open water". On the whole, year 2015 has not only been a tough year for the Fourth Estate of the country but it has also thrown woebegone and hermetic gossamer over the freedom of expression in Malaysia. THE JURISPRUDENCE ASPECT THE PAST: The cases which touch on the right of freedom of expression revolve around offences under two pieces of legislation in particular - the Sedition Act 19481 and Printing Presses and Publications Act 1984 ('PPPA').
    [Show full text]
  • Internal Communication Clearance Form
    HAUT-COMMISSARIAT AUX DROITS DE L’HOMME • OFFICE OF THE HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS PALAIS DES NATIONS • 1211 GENEVA 10, SWITZERLAND Mandates of the Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression; the Special Rapporteur on the rights to freedom of peaceful assembly and of association; the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights defenders; and the Special Rapporteur on the independence of judges and lawyers REFERENCE: UA MYS 6/2014: 1 October 2014 Excellency, We have the honour to address you in our capacity as Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression; Special Rapporteur on the rights to freedom of peaceful assembly and of association; Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights defenders; and Special Rapporteur on the independence of judges and lawyers pursuant to Human Rights Council resolutions 25/2, 24/5, 25/18, and 26/7. In this connection, we would like to bring to the attention of your Excellency’s Government information we have received concerning charges against an increasing number of politicians, Members of the Parliament, lawyers, human rights defenders, political activists, academics and journalists in Malaysia among them Messrs. N. Surendran, Khalid Samad, R.S.N. Rayer, Rafizi Ramli, Viktor Wong and Azmi Sharom, and Ms. Teresa Kok- under the Sedition Act of 1948 for publicly expressing opinions, publishing books, articles, notes or disseminating opinions and information through different channels, including through the Internet and traditional media. According to the information received, at least 23 individuals have been charged under subdivisions (a), (b), and (c) of Section 4(1) of the Sedition Act of 1948 in recent months.
    [Show full text]
  • Rafizi Wants PKR Reps Besides Azizah to Decline Malaysiakini.Com Aug 29, 2014
    Rafizi wants PKR reps besides Azizah to decline MalaysiaKini.com Aug 29, 2014 PKR vice-president Rafizi Ramli today congratulated newly-elected PKR youth chief Nik Nazmi Nik Ahmad for declining PAS Youth's suggestion to nominate him for the Selangor menteri besar post. Rafizi also lauded Nik Nazmi's (left) statement calling on all PKR Selangr assemblyperson from the party to do likewise through open statements. This would be in line with the party's "unanimous decision" on Wan Azizah, Rafizi said. "As such, I call upon all assemblypersons from PKR to make an open statement to reject any nomination for the post of menteri besar by any party as a means to respect the PKR leadership decision," he said. The call follows the Selangor palace's request for Pakatan parties to submit more than two names for the post, and PAS' insistence that it would put up at least two from PKR for the post. While Selangor Menteri Besar Abdul Khalid Ibrahim has finally tendered his resignation after failing to get the support of the majority of the state assemblypersons, the crisis is far from over. This is due to PAS' shifting stand on Khalid's replacement, despite a consensus agreement being beached at a Pakatan leadership meeting on Aug 17. While the outcome of the meeting was that Wan Azizah will be the sole candidate from Pakatan to be proposed to the palace, the sultan's request for multiple names has put PAS at odds with its coalition partners. Nik Nazmi: Thanks but no thanks Earlier today Nik Nazmi said he was grateful that PAS wants to nominate him soon as possible as Selangor menteri besar but he remains committed to supporting Wan Azizah's nomination.
    [Show full text]
  • I Was Assaulted Too, Claims Detainees' Lawyer
    PP3739/12/2003 ISSN 0127 - 5127 / RM3.00 / 2003:Vol.23No.4 AliranAliran CelebratesCelebrates 25th25th AnniversaryAnniversary Aliran Monthly : Vol.23(4) Page 1 COVER STORY Aliran’s 25 Anniversary Dinner Celebration Aliran Will Go On No one can stop Truth from marching on r Chairman, Distinguished Guests, MMM Friends, Ladies and Gentleman: Let me, first, thank all Aliran members and friends who have sweated hard to make this func- tion a reality. Seeing all of you here this evening, especially those who have come from outside Penang to be with us, I can already say this function is a success. For this, we are very grateful. We are grateful to the many generous donors and supporters who have kept faith with us and continue to be a source of inspiration in our long and arduous journey to- wards ‘Freedom and Justice’. We are grateful to our famous friends from the In- stant Café Theatre Company for performing gratis. Dear Friends and Members of Aliran, you represent the best in our society, citizens who are truly con- cerned with the larger issues that affect us as a na- tion. You represent the conscience of this country. It is people like you who nourish our spirit and strengthen our resolve to continue the good fight. 25 Years Is A Long Time In historical time, 25 years pass like a mere twinkle of the eye. For a nation, 25 years form a relatively short period. But, Friends, 25 years is a long time in the life of a society that is dedicated to ‘Freedom, Justice and Solidarity’.
    [Show full text]
  • Malaysia's Anti-Fake News
    TERRORISM DILEMMAS AND DEMOCRACY Malaysia’s Anti-Fake News Act A cog in an arsenal of anti-free speech laws and a bold promise of reforms Abstract: Malaysia’s surprising fourteenth general election result in May 2018 was widely hailed as the advent of a seismic shift for press freedom in the country. The country’s draconian media control armoury was often wantonly and oppressively applied over six decades under previous rule. Key actors from that era are now presiding over bold reforms that have been promised by the new government. In keeping with its election promises, the new govern- ment sought to repeal the hastily and badly drafted Anti-Fake News Act 2018 (AFNA). The Attorney-General Tommy Thomas wrote scathingly before the Act was passed and before taking office as the new A-G: The draconian effect of the entire bill renders it unconstitutional…This is a disgraceful piece of legislation drafted by a desperate government determined to crush dissent and silence critics. The bill is so hastily and poorly drafted that it cannot under any circumstances be improved by amendment. Instead, it must be rejected outright. (Thomas, 2018) The repeal effort, however, failed and the Act remains technically on the books. This article examines the Act against a backdrop of global responses to the ‘fake news’ phenomenon; provides an overview of Malaysia’s draconian armoury of laws that impinge on freedom of expression; discusses the fad- ing optimism for proper media regulation reform in Malaysia; and concludes that meaningful media regulation reform must go beyond repealing AFNA.
    [Show full text]
  • SEDITIOUS TENDENCY? Political Patronisation of Free Speech and Expression in Malaysia
    SEDITIOUS TENDENCY? Political Patronisation of Free Speech and Expression in Malaysia by Jeyaseelan Anthony Published by: ERA CONSUMER MALAYSIA (Education and Research Association for Consumers, Malaysia] ERA CONSUMER is a voluntary, non-political and non-profit organization. ERA focuses on issues ranging from food security, human rights, environment and consumer rights to women’s rights for a socially just and equitable society. SEDITIOUS TENDENCY? Political Patronisation of Free Speech and Expression in Malaysia Contents Preface ........................................................................................................................ 1 Foreword ..................................................................................................................... 3 Summary of Chapters.................................................................................................. 8 Glossary .....................................................................................................................10 Abbreviations and Acronyms ...................................................................................12 Chapter 1 Freedom of Speech and Expression under the Malaysian Constitution 1.1. Is the Freedom of Speech and Expression an absolute right? .......................13 Chapter 2 Sedition – Its Meaning and Origin 2.1. Meaning .........................................................................................................17 2.2. Origin ..............................................................................................................17
    [Show full text]
  • Sedition Act As a Pillar of Strength in Maintaining Unification for Multiracial Nation
    International Journal of Business, Economics and Law, Vol. 6, Issue 4 (Apr.) ISSN 2289-1552 2015 SEDITION ACT AS A PILLAR OF STRENGTH IN MAINTAINING UNIFICATION FOR MULTIRACIAL NATION Roos Niza Mohd Shariff Senior Lecturer (Law) School of Law, Government & International Studies Universiti Utara Malaysia, 06010 Sintok, Kedah, Malaysia Email: [email protected]; [email protected] ABSTRACT Malaysian Sedition Act provides sentences for seditious acts. Late 2014, there was a suggestion to abolish this Sedition Act for reason that Malaysia still able to maintain its multiracial unity without this Act. Thus, this working paper is to analyze the purpose of the implementation of Sedition Act in Malaysia and the impacts if the Act is abolish. Qualitative research method is used through analytical study of case laws and provisions of laws stated in the Sedition Act and the Federal Constitution. Research findings showed that Sedition Act had been in practice since the British occupation for the purpose of maintaining the unity of multiracial community with different religions and customs. This working paper concluded that Sedition Act is in fact a pillar of strength in maintaining the unification of multiracial nation in Malaysia. The Act upheld a crucial part of statutory provisions in the Federal Constitution for the stability and unity of union. Moreover, Sedition Act provides blanket protection via maintaining protection and security for the purpose of harmonious and safe nation. Keywords: Sedition Act, multiracial unity, nation stability Introduction It is not easy to ensure unity and stability in a country with many races, ethnics, religions, beliefs and customs like Malaysia.
    [Show full text]