The Price of Interest Rate Variance Risk and Optimal Investments in Interest Rate Derivatives
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
The price of interest rate variance risk and optimal investments in interest rate derivatives Anders B. Trolle Copenhagen Business School Abstract Recent research on unspanned stochastic variance raises the possibility that interest rate derivatives constitute an important component of optimal fixed income portfo- lios. In this paper, I estimate a flexible dynamic term structure model that allows for unspanned stochastic variance on an extensive data set of swaps and swaptions. I find that variance risk is predominantly unspanned by bonds, and that the price of risk on the unspanned variance factor is significantly larger in absolute value than the prices of risk on the term structure factors. Consequently, Sharpe ratios on variance sensitive derivatives are about three times larger than Sharpe ratios on bonds or short-term bond futures. These findings are corroborated by an analysis of the Treasury futures market, where the variance risk premium is estimated with a model independent approach. I then solve the dynamic portfolio choice problem for a long-term fixed income investor with and without access to interest rate derivatives and find substantial utility gains from participating in the derivatives market. JEL Classification: G11 Keywords: Portfolio choice, derivatives, stochastic variance, swaps, Treasury futures This version: December 2008 ——————————— I have benefitted from discussions with Giovanni Barone-Adesi, Michael Brennan, Wolfgang B¨uhler, Pierre Collin-Dufresne, David Lando, Francis Longstaff, Claus Munk, Carsten Sørensen and seminar participants at Copenhagen Business School. I am particularly grateful to Eduardo Schwartz for extensive comments. Some of the results in this paper were previously circulated under the title “Dynamic interest rate derivative strategies in the presence of unspanned stochastic volatility”. I thank the Danish Social Science Research Council for financial support. Address: Department of Finance, Copenhagen Business School, Solbjerg Plads 3, DK-2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark. Phone: +45 3815 3058. Email: abt.fi@cbs.dk. 1 Introduction The market for interest rate derivatives has grown rapidly over the last decade. For instance, the notional amount of outstanding over-the-counter interest rate options has increased 691 percent from USD 7.6 trillion in June 1998 to USD 62.1 trillion in June 2008, see BIS (2008). In addition, many standard fixed income securities such as mortgage-backed securities and agency securities imbed interest rate options. While there is an enormous amount of literature on the pricing, hedging, and risk management of interest rate derivatives, few papers view interest rate derivatives from a portfolio perspective, despite the fact that this issue is obviously important for many fixed income investors. This paper attempts to fill this gap in the literature. One reason that the portfolio choice literature has ignored interest rate derivatives is that standard term structure models assume that the fixed income market is complete in the sense that variance risk is completely spanned by bonds. In these models, interest rate derivatives are redundant securities that can be perfectly replicated by trading in the underlying bonds. However, this assumption has been challenged in recent years with a number of papers showing that a component of variance risk is not spanned by bonds and, therefore, that interest rate derivatives are not redundant securities. Unspanned stochastic variance was first discussed by Collin-Dufresne and Goldstein (2002) and further evidence in support for it has been provided by Heidari and Wu (2003), Andersen and Benzoni (2005), Li and Zhao (2006, 2008), Trolle and Schwartz (2008a), and Collin-Dufresne, Goldstein, and Jones (2008), among others. Unspanned stochastic variance raises the possibility that interest rate derivatives constitute an important component of optimal fixed income portfolios. First, to the extent that the unspanned component of variance risk is priced, derivatives improve investment opportunities and second, to the extent that that investment opportunities depend on variance, derivatives improve the ability to hedge against adverse changes in the investment opportunity set. The first goal of the paper is to analyze the extent to which interest rate variance risk – in particular, the unspanned component of variance risk – is priced. I use two approaches; first, I estimate the variance risk premium in the Treasury futures market without using a particular pricing model, and, second, I estimate the variance risk premium in the interest rate swap market using a dynamic term structure model. The reason for using different data in the two approaches is the following: the model independent analysis is predicated upon the existence of a liquid market for options across a wide range of strikes. While such a market has long existed in the case of options on Treasury futures, it has only recently emerged in the case of 1 options on interest rate swaps, i.e. swaptions, where only ATM options were actively quoted until four or five years ago. On the other hand, estimating a dynamic term structure model simultaneously on Treasury futures and their associated options is rather involved, whereas it is relatively straightforward to estimate such a model simultaneously on swaps and their associated swaptions. The two approaches complement each other. The model independent analysis provides robust estimates of the variance risk premium with which the model dependent estimates may be compared, and the model independent analysis also gives insights into the dynamics of the variance risk premium which forms the basis for parameterizing the market price of variance risk in the dynamic term structure model. To estimate the interest rate variance risk premium without a particular pricing model, I rely on synthetic variance swaps which pay the difference between the realized variance of a Treasury futures contract over the life of the swap and a fixed variance swap rate, which can be inferred from a cross-section of options on the Treasury futures contract. The average payoff or return on a sequence of such variance swaps provides a model independent estimate of the Treasury futures variance risk premium. I use daily data on 5, 10, and 30 year Treasury futures and their associated options from January 3, 1995 until March 5, 2008. I find that 1) the Treasury futures variance risk premium is significantly negative, 2) short- ing variance swaps generate Sharpe ratios that are about two to three times larger than the Sharpe ratios of the underlying Treasury futures, 3) the variance risk premium is not a com- pensation for exposure to bond or equity market risks, suggesting that there is an unspanned variance factor with a significant risk premium, and 4) the variance risk premium varies over time and becomes more negative when variance increases, particularly when the premium is measured in dollar terms. To estimate the interest rate variance risk premium within a dynamic term structure model, I develop a model that shares many features with that in Trolle and Schwartz (2008a) but has a more parsimonious structure. It has N term structure factors and one additional unspanned variance factor. Innovations to variance and the term structure may be correlated so that variance can contain both a spanned and an unspanned component. Inspired by the model independent analysis, I parameterize the variance risk premium such that it is linear in variance itself. I estimate the model using daily data on LIBOR and swap rates and short-term ATM swaptions on 2, 5, 10, and 30 year swaps from January 23, 1997 to April 30, 2008. For the last four years of the sample period, I also use unique data on swaption “smiles”, i.e. swaptions 2 with a wide range of strikes, obtained from the largest broker in the interest rate derivatives market. This “smile” information is important for estimating the extent to which variance is unspanned, and, to my knowledge, it is the first time that this data has been used in the empirical term structure literature. I consider model specifications with one, two, and three term structure factors and estimate with quasi-maximum likelihood in conjunction with the extended Kalman filter. In a methodological contribution, I derive a fast and accurate Fourier-based swaption pricing formula that enables me to estimate the model on a large set of swaptions. I find that 1) innovations to variance are only weakly related to innovations to the term structure, i.e. variance risk is predominantly unspanned, 2) the estimated market price of risk on the unspanned variance factor is strongly negative – much more negative than the prices of risk on the term structure factors – and statistically significant, and 3) the model-implied Sharpe ratio on a derivative exposed solely to variance is about three times larger in absolute value than the model-implied Sharpe ratios on bonds or short-term bond futures, consistent with the findings in the model-independent analysis. These findings hold true regardless of the number of term structure factors. The second goal of the paper is to analyze the benefits of including interest rate derivatives in fixed income portfolios. I assume that investment opportunities evolve according to the term structure model estimated in this paper. I then derive the optimal portfolio strategy for a long-term fixed income investor with CRRA utility over terminal wealth, who either does or does not participate in the interest rate derivatives market, and I compute the utility