AVL Flood -Final-Dbr

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

• Several dozen lives lost • $21 million in damages ($500 million in today's dollars) • Railroad tracks damaged or destroyed • Dams destroyed, cutting off all hydroelectric power This catastrophic event reminds us of society’s vulnerability to • Severe flooding in Biltmore Village and on the natural hazards and of the interconnectedness of our towns Biltmore Estate with the surrounding environment. We cannot stop extreme • Warehouses, industrial plants, and homes along the French Broad flooded weather events, but we can make our communities more • Riverside Park washed away On September 17, 2004, Hurricane Ivan led to resilient to these events. flooding outside Biltmore Village July 15–17 Rainfall Totals July 16, 1916 French Broad River at Asheville Brevard: 14.70 inches 22.22 inches of rainfall at Altapass 8 a.m. 13.5 feet remains the state record for highest Morganton: 12.66 inches 9 a.m. 18.6 feet 10 a.m. Rain gauge washed away 24-hour precipitation total Hendersonville: 12.32 inches French Broad estimated crest: 23.1 feet Asheville: 2.98 inches Swannanoa River crest: 20.7 feet July 8–10, 1916 July 15–17, 1916 July 9 July 12–13 July 5–6 July 11 July 7–8 French Broad River at Asheville Storm strengthened to a July 14 July 15 First hurricane made landfall reached 4.8 feet, 0.8 feet above Second storm formed Storm moved east into Category 3 with 113-mph between Biloxi and Mobile, flood stage about 300 miles east of It weakened to It became a weak central Alabama winds Alabama, with winds of 118 mph the Bahamas 108 mph before extratropical low in Rain continued Rain began falling in It moved to just off the making landfall the Smoky Mountains It moved to north-central French Broad River at western North Carolina Atlantic coast at Charleston, near Charleston west of Asheville Mississippi while weakening Storm weakened and dissipated Asheville reached 8.8 feet South Carolina near Chattanooga, Tennessee JULY 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 First Storm /NOAANCEIclimate Second Storm /NOAANCEIocangeo /NOAANCEIclimate www.ncei.noaa.gov For more information on the 2016 flood and building resilient /NOAANCEIocngeo nemac.unca.edu www.facebook.com/uncanemac communities, scan the QR code with your portable device..

Copy Link

Recommended publications

French Broad River Basin Restoration Priorities 2009
French Broad River Basin Restoration Priorities 2009 French Broad River Basin Restoration Priorities 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 1 What is a River Basin Restoration Priority? 1 Criteria for Selecting a Targeted Local Watershed (TLW) 2 French Broad River Basin Overview 3 French Broad River Basin Restoration Goals 5 River Basin and TLW Map 7 Targeted Local Watershed Summary Table 8 Discussion of TLWs in the French Broad River Basin 10 2005 Targeted Local Watersheds Delisted in 2009 40 References 41 For More Information 42 Definitions 43 This document was updated by Andrea Leslie, western watershed planner. Cover Photo: French Broad River, Henderson County during 2004 flood after Hurricanes Frances and Ivan French Broad River Basin Restoration Priorities 2009 1 Introduction This document, prepared by the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP), presents a description of Targeted Local Watersheds within the French Broad River Basin. This is an update of a document developed in 2005, the French Broad River Basin Watershed Restoration Plan. The 2005 plan selected twenty-nine watersheds to be targeted for stream, wetland and riparian buffer restoration and protection and watershed planning efforts. This plan retains twenty-seven of these original watersheds, plus presents an additional two Targeted Local Watersheds (TLWs) for the French Broad River Basin. Two 2005 TLWs (East Fork North Toe River and French Broad River and North Toe River/Bear Creek/Grassy Creek) were gardens, Mitchell County not re-targeted in this document due to a re-evaluation of local priorities. This document draws information from the detailed document, French Broad River Basinwide Water Quality Plan—April 2005, which was written by the NC Division of Water Quality (DWQ).
[Show full text]
NOAA's National Weather Service Advanced Hydrologic Prediction
NOAA’s National Weather Service Advanced Hydrologic Prediction Services How to implement the regional map inline frame ©2012 Office of Hydrologic Development/Office of Climate Water and Weather Service 2 Introduction NOAA’s National Weather Service (NWS) provides a wide variety of hydrologic and hydrometeorologic forecasts and information through the web. These web-based resources originate at NWS field, national center, and headquarters offices and are designed to meet the needs of a wide range of users from someone who needs the five-day forecast for a river near his home to the technically advanced water manager who needs probabilistic information to make long-term decisions on allocation of flood mitigation resources or water supply. The NWS will continue to expand and refine all types of web products to keep pace with the demands of all types of users. Hydrologic resources location The NWS Hydrologic resources can be accessed at https://water.weather.gov or by clicking the “Rivers, Lakes, Rainfall” link from https://www.weather.gov. Regional Map – River Observations and River Forecasts Figure 1: National View The regional AHPS map inline frame (or iframe, as it will be referenced throughout the rest of this document), as seen in figure 1, consists of several components: toggles to change which gauge markers display on the map; ESRI map controls; flood status indicators and location-based data view selectors. The starting point, which is available outside of the iframe component, is a national map providing a brief summary to the river and stream location statuses within the continental United States. From this national overview, you can navigate to specific 3 regions – state, Weather Forecast Office (WFO), River Forecast Center (RFC) and Water Resource Region (WRR) – by selecting an option by neighboring drop down menus or clicking on marker images on the map.
[Show full text]
Community Open House
Mayor Kasim Reed The Department of Watershed Management & Atlanta Memorial Park Conservancy Community Open House 10/28/2016 1 AGENDA: Meet & Greet Opening Remarks & Introductions – District 8 Council Member Yolanda Adrean – Department of Watershed Management, Commissioner Kishia L. Powell – AMPC Executive Director, Catherine Spillman – Memorial Park Technical Advisory Group members, other Civic Leaders and Officials Department of Watershed Management – Presentation Q&A Closing Remarks 10/28/2016 2 AMPTAG-DWM COLLABORATIVE The Atlanta Memorial Park Technical Advisory Group (AMPTAG) and the City of Atlanta’s Department of Watershed Management (DWM) are engaged in ongoing discussions and scheduled workshops associated with the following goals: 1. Eliminate wet weather overflows within and near Memorial Park and within the Peachtree Creek Sewer Basin; and 2. Protect water quality in Peachtree Creek 10/28/2016 3 EPA/EPD Consent Decrees 1995 lawsuit results in two (2) Consent Decrees • CSO Consent Decree (Sep 1998) – Project completion by 2008 (achieved) o Reduce CSOs from 100/yr. at each of 6 facilities to 4/yr. o Achieve water quality standards at point of discharge • SSO Consent Decree (Dec 1999) Project completion by 2027 (per amendment approved 2012) o Stop 1000+ annual sewer spills o Achieve a reliable sewer system o Implement MOMS plan 10/28/2016 4 Clean Water Atlanta: Overview • Responsible for the overall management of the City’s two Consent Decrees – CSO and SSO. • Charge is to address operation of the City’s wastewater facilities and address CSOs and SSOs within the city. • Responsible for planning, design, and construction of improvements to the City's wastewater collection system, as well as environmental compliance and reporting to comply with the Consent Decrees.
[Show full text]
The Wilmington Wave National Weather Service, Wilmington, NC
The Wilmington Wave National Weather Service, Wilmington, NC VOLUME III, ISSUE 1 F A L L 2 0 1 3 INSIDE THIS ISSUE: Summer 2013: Above Average Rainfall Summer 2013 1-2 - Brad Reinhart Rainfall If you spent time outside this summer, your outdoor activities were probably interrupted by Top 3 Strongest 3-5 rain at some point. Of course, afternoon showers and thunderstorms during the summertime Storms in Wilmington are fairly common in the eastern Carolinas. But, did you know that we experienced record rainfall totals, rising rivers, and flooding within our forecast area this meteorological summer Masonboro 6-8 (June – August 2013)? Here’s a recap of what turned out to be quite a wet summer. Buoy Florence, SC received the most rainfall (27.63’’) of our four climate sites during the months The Tsunami 9-12 of June, July, and August. This total was a staggering 12.53’’ above normal for the summer months. In July alone, 14.91’’ of rain fell in Florence. This made July 2013 the wettest Local Hail Study 12-13 month EVER in Florence since records began in 1948! Wilmington, NC received 25.78’’ of rain this summer, which was 6.35’’ above normal. North Myrtle Beach, SC and Lumberton, A Summer of 14 Decision NC received well over 20 inches of rain as well. Support Excess rainfall must go somewhere, so many of our local rivers rose in response to the heavy rain across the Carolinas. In total, 8 of our 11 river forecast points exceeded flood stage this summer. Some of these rivers flooded multiple times; in fact, our office issued 24 river flood warnings and 144 river flood statements from June to August.
[Show full text]
The North Fork Burnetts (Burnet) Who Were a Remarkable American Family Characterized As Strong fighters and Adventuresome Settlers
UNCATEGORIZED Date: August 19, 2015Author: teeeagle 7 Comments an ancestral blog by Terrell Ledbetter . Revised January 17, 2019 If you see this blog copied onto another ancestral site, the person that did the copy/paste did so without permission and is in no way associated with this historical account. The Black Mountain range consisting of twenty 6000 feet mountains forming a “J”, stand majestically over a mostly wilderness land that is (for most purposes) preserved from settlement, hunting and rampant logging because it serves as the watershed for the City of Asheville, North Carolina. You have seen the valley with the large lake supplied by steep mountain streams in movies. One movies in particular showcases the valley— “The Last of the Mohicans.” There is a family story to this land which falls below Black Mountain Gap and Potato Knob on the Blue Ridge Parkway near Clingman’s Dome and Mt. Mitchell. The prominent family in this picture is the Burnett family of the North Fork of the Swannanoa River. Frederick McCloud Burnett (March 24, 1882‐February 4, 1961) published “This Was My Valley” in 1960, a year before his death. Fred M. Burnett was the great‐grandson of Frederick Thomas Burnett Sr. and the son of Marcus Lafayette (Fate) Burnett. He was former district supervisor of the Interstate Commerce Commission from which he retired in 1949 to live in Ridgecrest. The stories he portrayed had occurred as long as three generations before or about a hundred and sixty years. It is easy to understand why there would be confusion. Here in 2019, we have the benefit of census records, marriage and death certificates, land transaction records, copies of personal letters, grave markers, and many collaborating stories of past times.
[Show full text]
Hurricane Harvey Clean Rivers Program Impact Lessons Learned from Laboratory Flooding Table of Contents
Hurricane Harvey Clean Rivers Program Impact Lessons Learned from Laboratory Flooding Table of Contents • Hurricane Harvey General Information • Local River Basin impact • Community Impact • LNVA Laboratory Impact • Lessons Learned General Information Hurricane Harvey Overview General Information • Significantly more info is available online • Wikipedia, RedCross, Weather.GoV, etc • Brief Information • Struck Texas on August 24, 2017 • Stalled, dumped rain, went back to sea • Struck Louisiana on August 29, 2017 • Stalled, dumped rain, finally drifted inland • Some estimates of rainfall are >20 TRILLION gallons General Information • Effect on Texans • 13,000 rescued • 30,000 left homeless • 185,000 homes damaged • 336,000 lost electricity • >$100,000,000,000 in revenue lost • Areas of Houston received flooding that exceeded the 100,000 year flood estimates General Information • On the plus side… • 17% spike in births 9 months after Harvey • Unprecedented real-world drainage modeling • Significant future construction needs identified • IH-10 and many feeder highways already being altered to account for high(er) rainfall events • Many homes being built even higher, above normal 100y and 500Y flood plains River Basin Impact Lower Neches River and surrounding areas River Basin Impact • Downed trees • Providing habitat for fish and ecotone species • Trash • Still finding debris and trash miles inland and tens of feet up in trees • And bones • Oil spills • Still investigating, but likely will not see impact River Basin Impact • The region is used to normal, seasonal flooding • most plants and wildlife are adapted to it • Humans are likely the only species really impacted • And their domestic partners Village Creek, one of the tributaries of the Neches River, had a discharge comparable to that of the Niagra River (i.e.
[Show full text]
Buncombe County Context the Communities Throughout Buncombe County Are Tain Vistas, Hike Numerous Trails, and Wheel Down As Diverse As Its Landscape
Draft Plan for Public Review—August 2012 Chapter 2: Buncombe County Context The communities throughout Buncombe County are tain vistas, hike numerous trails, and wheel down as diverse as its landscape. Some sectors of the single track mountain bike trails that rank among County remain in a rural and natural state, with farm- the best in the United States. The area is also a lands and pasture abutting steep mountain grades. hub for artists and culinary endeavors. This com- Other areas have experienced rapid growth and, bined with the cultural influence of like-minded while not within city or town limits, have urban cen- residents who reside in Buncombe County and con- ters, neighborhoods and other commercial areas. The tribute to our active lifestyles, complement a cities and towns of Buncombe County—Asheville, Bilt- strong tourism-based economy and create a con- more Forest, Black Mountain, Montreat, Weaverville, text within Buncombe County that should help nat- and Woodfin—each have qualities that contribute to urally promote a stronger greenway culture. the overall feel of the County and the region. This chapter reflects the factors that contribute to Factors such as terrain, historic landmarks and prox- the uniqueness of communities across Buncombe imity to rivers and streams make each community County. It also profiles the feedback gathered dur- unique while adding to the challenges of realizing a ing the public meetings and stakeholder work- regionwide, inter-connected greenway system. The shops in 2011 and 2012. challenges faced in planning for and constructing There is an expectation among area stakeholders greenways and trails systems in Western North Caro- that Buncombe County, its municipal partners, non lina can be traced back to ancient eras when the -profits, land conservancies and other government Sunset over Lake Julian near the Arden community in network of streams and rivers carved valleys through- agencies will act as a unified voice to create a re- south Buncombe County.
[Show full text]
NOAA National Weather Service Flood Forecast Services
NOAA National Weather Service Flood Forecast Services Jonathan Brazzell Service Hydrologist National Weather Service Forecast Office Lake Charles Louisiana J Advanced Hydrologic Prediction Service - AHPS This is where all current operational riverine forecast services are located. ● Observations and deterministic forecasts ● Some probabilistic forecast information is available at various locations with more to be added as time allows. ● Graphical Products ● Static Flood Inundation Mapping slowly spinning down in an effort to put more resources to Dynamic Flood Inundation Maps! http://water.weather.gov/ AHPS Basic Services ● Dynamic Web Mapping Service ○ Shows Flood Risk Categories Based on Observations or Forecast ○ Deterministic Forecast Hydrograph ○ River Impacts http://water.weather.gov/ Forecast location Observations with at least a 5 day forecast. Forecast period is longer for larger river systems. Deterministic forecast based on 24 -72 hour forecast rainfall depending on confidence. Impacts Probabilistic guidance over the next 90 days based on current conditions and historical simulations. We will continue to increase the number of sites with time. Flood Categories Below Flood Stage - The river is at or below flood stage. Action Stage - The river is still below flood stage or at bankfull, but little if any impact. This stage requires that forecast be issued as a heads up for flood only forecast points. Minor - Minimal or no property damage, but possibly some public threat. Moderate - Some inundation of structures and roads near the stream – some evacuations of people and property possible. Major - Extensive inundation of structures and roads. Significant evacuations of people and property. Rainfall that goes into the models Rainfall is constantly QC’d by looking at radar and rain gauge observations on an hourly basis.
[Show full text]
Fermi 2 Ufsar
FERMI 2 UFSAR 2.4. HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING 2.4.1. Hydrologic Description 2.4.1.1. Site and Facilities The Fermi site is located adjacent to the western shore of Lake Erie (Figure 2.4-1). Prior to construction of Fermi 2, the site area was a lagoon separated from Lake Erie by a barrier beach, known as Lagoona Beach, which formed the eastern site boundary. The Fermi 2 preconstruction topography is shown in Figure 2.4-2. The lagoon was connected to Lake Erie by Swan Creek, a perennial stream that discharges into Lake Erie about 1 mile north of the Fermi plant site. The site for Fermi 2 was prepared by excavating soft soils and rock, and constructing rock fill to a nominal plant grade elevation of 583 ft. All elevations refer to New York Mean Tide, 1935. The topography of the developed site as of December 10, 1972, is shown in Figure 2.4-3. Category I structures housing safety-related equipment consist of the reactor/auxiliary building and the residual heat removal (RHR) complex. These structures are indicated in Figure 2.1-5. The plant site is not susceptible to flooding caused by surface runoff because of the shoreline location and the distance of the site from major streams. Plant grade is raised approximately 11 ft above the surrounding area to further minimize the possibility of flooding. Flooding of the site is conceivable only as the result of an extremely severe storm with a storm-generated rise in the level of Lake Erie. Protection of safety-related structures and equipment against this type of flooding is provided through the location, arrangement, and design of the structures with respect to the shoreline and possible storm-generated waves.
[Show full text]
Interactive Flood Stage Map Help Manual
CITY OF MOORHEAD GIS – INTERACTIVE FLOOD STAGE MAP Interactive Flood Stage Map Help Manual CITY OF MOORHEAD Geographic Information Systems 500 Center AVE Moorhead, MN 56560 1 CITY OF MOORHEAD GIS – INTERACTIVE FLOOD STAGE MAP Table of Contents Interactive Flood Stage Map User Interface ............................................................................ 2 Map Navigation, Address Search, Tools, Map Layers ........................................................... 3 Contours, Flood Stages, Property Information ....................................................................... 5 Print Map, Legend & Help .............................................................................................................. 6 Disclaimer ........................................................................................................................................... 7 Interactive Flood Stage Map User Interface This GIS application provides information on the Red River flood stage levels that may affect properties and structures in the City of Moorhead. This application is intended to provide information for the residents of the City of Moorhead. If additional information is required please visit the City of Moorhead’s Floodplain Information website at: http://www.cityofmoorhead.com/departments/engineering/floodplain-information The 1/2 foot river stages were derived from LiDAR elevation data acquired in May 20 . • Areas of river flooding are shown in blue • Areas protected by levees and floodwalls are shown in green 17 Some features
[Show full text]
Flooding in Coastal Areas of Mississippi and Southeastern Louisiana, May 9-10,1995
U.S. Department of the Interior Flooding in Coastal Areas of U.S. Geological Survey Mississippi and Southeastern u Louisiana, May 9-10,1995 G INTRODUCTION Extreme weather conditions, which produced as MISSISSIPPI much as 27.5 inches of rain during a 55-hour period from May 8-10,1995, caused the most severe flooding in recent history along coastal areas of the Gulf of Mexico in Mississippi and southeastern Louisiana (fig. 1). A resident near Biloxi, Mississippi, whose house had been under almost 4 feet of water said, "This was a hurricane without the wind." Several streamflow-gaging stations used to measure water levels in streams and rivers in the area recorded the highest peak stages in the history of their operation. At least six people died and thousands more were left homeless as a result of the intense flooding. At least $3 billion in property damages were reported in New Orleans, Louisiana alone, and millions more in damage were reported in the Gulf Coast counties in Mississippi and parishes in southeastern Louisiana as a result of the storm (fig. 2; The Clarion Ledger, 1995). FLOOD OF MAY 9-10,1995 A short-wave trough of low pressure, fueled by excessive dew points coupled with a subtropical jet A USGS STREAMFLOW stream positioned along a stationary front, GAGING STATION triggered extreme rainfall which persisted across -10- LINE OF EQUAL PRECIPITATION- the coastal areas of Mississippi and southeastern Interval 10 inches Louisiana during May 8-10,1995, resulting in two separate storms. Official rainfall totals for the storms exceeded 20 inches at several locations in Figure 1.
[Show full text]
Chapter 16 Structural Adjustments to Flood Risk
Chapter 16 Structural Adjustments to Flood Risk Chapter Overview The preceding chapter examined a number of floodplain management measures that are commonly applied by localities. This chapter covers several other measures – those involving structural adjustments to flood risk. They involve flood water detention structures, other structures to redirect the paths of flood waters, and individual protective measures involving structural modifications to flood prone properties. Dams and Reservoirs1 Webster's Dictionary provides a very simple definition of a dam: a barrier built across a waterway to control the flow or raise the level of the water. A much more detailed definition is given in the Federal Guidelines for Dam Safety, which are followed by all federal agencies responsible for the design, construction, operation, and regulation of dams. “Any artificial barrier, including appurtenant works, which impounds or diverts water, and which (1) is 25 feet or more in height from the natural bed of the stream or watercourse measured at the downstream toe of the barrier or from the lowest elevation of the outside limit of the barrier if it is not across a stream channel or watercourse, to the maximum water storage elevation or (2) has an impounding capacity at maximum water storage elevation of 50 acre feet or more. These guidelines do not apply to any such barrier which is not in excess of 6 feet in height regardless of storage capacity, or which has storage capacity at maximum water storage elevation not in excess of 15 acre-feet regardless of height. This lower size limitation should be waived if there is potentially significant downstream hazard.” There are over 75,000 dams of all sizes in the United States.
[Show full text]