DOCSLIB.ORG

4FFLK904: Public Law | King's College London

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
4FFLK904: Public Law | King's College London 10/02/21 4FFLK904: Public Law | King's College London 4FFLK904: Public Law View Online A, Dicey. 1885a. An Introduction to the Study of the Law and the Constitution 10th Edition. A, Dicey. 1885b. An Introduction to the Study of the Law and the Constitution 10th Edition. Alder, John, Michael Haley, Barry Hough, and Richard Mullender. 2002. General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law. Fourth edition. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. Anon. 1AD. ‘Prohibitions, Case of [1607] EWHC KB J23.’ Anon. 2ADa. ‘Entick v Carrington & Ors [1765] EWHC KB J98 (02 November 1765).’ Anon. 2ADb. ‘Entick v Carrington & Ors [1765] EWHC KB J98 (02 November 1765).’ Anon. 10ADa. ‘Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation [1947] EWCA Civ 1 (10 November 1947).’ Anon. 10ADb. ‘Attorney General v De Keyser’s Royal Hotel Ltd [1920] UKHL 1.’ Anon. 10ADc. ‘Attorney General v De Keyser’s Royal Hotel Ltd [1920] UKHL 1.’ Anon. 13AD. ‘Jackson & Ors v. Her Majesty’s Attorney General [2005] UKHL 56 (13 October 2005).’ Anon. 14AD. ‘Ridge v Baldwin (No 1) [1963] UKHL 2.’ Anon. 16ADa. ‘A & Ors v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] UKHL 56.’ Anon. 16ADb. ‘A & Ors v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] UKHL 56.’ Anon. 18ADa. ‘R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, Ex P. Northumbria Police Authority [1987] EWCA Civ 5.’ Anon. 18ADb. ‘Thoburn v Sunderland City Council [2002] EWHC 195.’ Anon. 1297. ‘Magna Carta.’ Anon. 1688a. ‘Bill of Rights [1688].’ 1/6 10/02/21 4FFLK904: Public Law | King's College London Anon. 1688b. ‘Bill of Rights [1688].’ Anon. 1700. ‘Act of Settlement (1700).’ Anon. 1706. ‘Union with Scotland Act 1706.’ Anon. 1998a. ‘Human Rights Act 1998.’ Anon. 1998b. ‘Human Rights Act 1998.’ Anon. 2011. ‘British Academy Review.’ (18). Anon. n.d. ‘Act of Union 1707.’ Anon. n.d. ‘Animals Act 1971.’ Anon. n.d. ‘Anti-Terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001.’ Anon. n.d. ‘Balfour Declaration 1926.’ Anon. n.d. ‘BBC Homepage.’ Retrieved (http://www.bbc.co.uk). Anon. n.d. ‘Beatty v Gillbanks [1882].’ Anon. n.d. ‘British and Irish Legal Information Institute (British and Irish Case Law & Legislation, European Union Case Law, Law Commission Reports, and Other Law-Related British and Irish Material).’ Retrieved (http://www.bailii.org). Anon. n.d. ‘Constitutional Reform Act 2005.’ Anon. n.d. ‘Constitutional Reform and Governance Act 2010.’ Anon. n.d. ‘Constitutional Reform and Governance Act 2010.’ Anon. n.d. ‘Constitutional Reform and Governance Act 2010.’ Anon. n.d. ‘Council of Civil Service Unions v Minister for the Civil Service [1983] UKHL 6.’ Anon. n.d. ‘Council of Civil Service Unions v Minister for the Civil Service [1983] UKHL 6 (22 November 1983).’ Anon. n.d. ‘Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994.’ Anon. n.d. ‘Crown Proceedings Act 1947.’ Anon. n.d. ‘Estate Agents Act 1979.’ Anon. n.d. ‘European Communities Act 1972.’ Anon. n.d. Fixed-Term Parliaments Act 2011. HMSO. Anon. n.d. ‘Fixed-Term Parliaments Act 2011.’ 2/6 10/02/21 4FFLK904: Public Law | King's College London Anon. n.d. Fixed-Term Parliaments Act 2011. HMSO. Anon. n.d. ‘Freedom of Information Act 2000.’ Anon. n.d. ‘Government of Wales Act 1998.’ Anon. n.d. ‘Government of Wales Act 1998.’ Anon. n.d. ‘House of Lords Act 1999.’ Anon. n.d. ‘House of Lords - Regina v. Secretary of State for Transport Ex Parte Factortame Limited and Others.’ Anon. n.d. ‘House of Lords - R (On The Application of Corner House Research and Others) V Director of The Serious Fraud Office.’ Anon. n.d. ‘Kings Law Journal.’ Anon. n.d. ‘Law Quarterly Review.’ Anon. n.d. ‘Life Peerages Act 1958.’ Anon. n.d. ‘Padfield v Min of Agriculture [1968].’ Anon. n.d. ‘Parliament Act 1911.’ Anon. n.d. ‘Parliament Acts 1949.’ Anon. n.d. ‘Parliamentary Affairs.’ Anon. n.d. ‘Parliamentary Voting System and Constituencies Act 2011.’ Anon. n.d. ‘Parliamentary Voting System and Constituencies Act 2011.’ Anon. n.d. ‘Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984.’ Anon. n.d. ‘Prohibitions, Case of [1607] EWHC KB J23 (01 November 1607).’ Retrieved (http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/KB/1607/J23.html). Anon. n.d. ‘Public Bodies Act 2011.’ Anon. n.d. ‘Public Law.’ Anon. n.d. ‘Public Order Act 1936.’ Anon. n.d. ‘Public Order Act 1986.’ Anon. n.d. ‘R (on the Application of Abbasi and Another) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs and Another | LexisWeb.’ Anon. n.d. ‘R v Somerset County Council, Ex Parte Fewings.’ 3/6 10/02/21 4FFLK904: Public Law | King's College London Anon. n.d. ‘Scotland Act 1998.’ Anon. n.d. ‘Scotland Act 1998.’ Anon. n.d. ‘Sewell Convention.’ Anon. n.d. ‘Statute of Westminster 1931.’ Anon. n.d. ‘The Guardian: Law.’ The Guardian. Retrieved (http://www.theguardian.com/law). Anon. n.d. ‘The Memorandum of Understanding and Supplementary Agreements between the UK Government, the Scottish Ministers, the Welsh Ministers, and the Northern Ireland Executive Committee.’ Anon. n.d. ‘The Petition of Right 1628.’ Anon. n.d. ‘The Reform Act 1832.’ Anon. n.d. ‘The Royal Prerogative - Commons Library Standard Note.’ Anon. n.d. ‘Treason Act 1351.’ Barnett, Hilaire. 2017. Constitutional & Administrative Law. Twelfth edition. London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. Bell, J. .., ed. n.d. ‘Cambridge Law Journal.’ Bingham, Lord. 2008. ‘The Rule of Law and the Sovereignty of Parliament?’ King’s Law Journal 19(2):223–34. doi: 10.1080/09615768.2008.11423668. Bogdanor, Vernon. 2016. ‘Brexit, the Constitution and the Alternatives.’ King’s Law Journal 27(3):314–22. Bradley, A. W., K. D. Ewing, and Christopher Knight. 2018. Constitutional and Administrative Law. Seventeenth edition. Harlow, England: Pearson. Brazier, Rodney. 2008. Constitutional Reform: Reshaping the British Political System. 3rd ed. [Oxford: Oxford University Press. Buyse, Antoine, ed. n.d. ‘ECHR BLOG.’ Retrieved (http://www.echrblog.blogspot.co.uk/). Dan Tench, Emma Cross, Emma Boffey, Rose Falconer and Adam Kosmalski (CMS) Hugh Tomlinson QC, Matthew Ryder QC, Anthony Fairclough and Emily Campbell (Matrix) [Editors]. n.d. ‘UKSC Blog (UK Supreme Court Blog).’ Retrieved (http://ukscblog.com). Ganz, Gabriele. 2001. Understanding Public Law. 3rd ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell. Hale, Lady. 2014. ‘Lady Hale Gives Keynote Address to the Constitutional and Administrative Law Bar Association Conference 2014.’ House of Commons Public Administration, and Constitutional Affairs Committee. 11AD. 4/6 10/02/21 4FFLK904: Public Law | King's College London ‘The Role of Parliament in the UK Constitution Interim Report: The Status and Effect of Confidence Motions and the Fixed-Term Parliaments Act 2011 [Report].’ (Fourteenth Report of Session 2017–19). Jennings, Ivor. 1959. The Law and the Constitution. 5th ed. London: Hodder and Stoughton. Jonathan Metzer (Editor), Rosalind English, Angus McCullough QC, David Hart QC, Martin Downs, im Duffy English. n.d. ‘UK Human Rights Blog of 1COR.’ Retrieved (http://ukhumanrightsblog.com). Jowell, Jeffrey L., and Colm O’Cinneide. 2019. The Changing Constitution. Ninth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press. Jowell, J. L., and Dawn Oliver. 2011. The Changing Constitution. 7th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Kershaw, David, ed. n.d. ‘Modern Law Review.’ Lee, R. G. 2019. Blackstone’s Statutes on Public Law & Human Rights, 2019-2020. 29th edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press. Leyland, Peter. 2016. The Constitution of the United Kingdom: A Contextual Analysis. Third edition. Oxford: Hart Publishing. Lord Bingham. 2007. ‘The Rule of Law.’ The Cambridge Law Journal 66(1):67–85. Loughlin, Martin. 2013. The British Constitution: A Very Short Introduction. Vol. Very Short Introductions. First edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press. Loveland, Ian. 2018. Constitutional Law, Administrative Law, and Human Rights: A Critical Introduction. Eighth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press. Low, Sidney. 1904. The Governance of England. London: Fisher Unwin. Marshall, Geoffrey, and Graeme Cochrane Moodie. 1971. Some Problems of the Constitution. Vol. Politics. 5th rev. ed. London: Hutchinson. Norton, Philip. 2019a. ‘Is the House of Commons Too Powerful? The 2019 Bingham Lecture in Constitutional Studies, University of Oxford.’ Parliamentary Affairs 72(4):996–1013. doi: 10.1093/pa/gsz022. Norton, Philip. 2019b. ‘Is the House of Commons Too Powerful? The 2019 Bingham Lecture in Constitutional Studies, University of Oxford.’ Parliamentary Affairs 72(4):996–1013. doi: 10.1093/pa/gsz022. Raz, J. 1977. ‘The Rule of Law and Its Virtue.’ Law Quarterly Review(93). Le Sueur, A. P., Maurice Sunkin, and Jo Eric Murkens. 2019. Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. Fourth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press. Tomkins, Adam. 2003. Public Law. Vol. Clarendon law series. Oxford: Oxford University 5/6 10/02/21 4FFLK904: Public Law | King's College London Press. Tomkins, Adam. 2005. Our Republican Constitution. Oxford: Hart. Turpin, Colin C., and Adam Tomkins. 2011. British Government and the Constitution: Text and Materials. Vol. Law in context. 7th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Twomey, Anne. 2018. ‘8. Prorogation.’ in The veiled sceptre: reserve powers of heads of state in Westminster systems. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. Wicks, Elizabeth. 2006. The Evolution of a Constitution: Eight Key Moments in British Constitutional History. Oxford: Hart. 6/6.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cats and the Law: Research Report
    Middlesex University Research Repository An open access repository of Middlesex University research http://eprints.mdx.ac.uk Nurse, Angus ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2486-4973 and Ryland, Diane (2013) Cats and the law: research report. Project Report. Middlesex University and University of Lincoln. [Monograph] Final accepted version (with author’s formatting) This version is available at: https://eprints.mdx.ac.uk/12968/ Copyright: Middlesex University Research Repository makes the University’s research available electronically. Copyright and moral rights to this work are retained by the author and/or other copyright owners unless otherwise stated. The work is supplied on the understanding that any use for commercial gain is strictly forbidden. A copy may be downloaded for personal, non-commercial, research or study without prior permission and without charge. Works, including theses and research projects, may not be reproduced in any format or medium, or extensive quotations taken from them, or their content changed in any way, without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder(s). They may not be sold or exploited commercially in any format or medium without the prior written permission of the copyright holder(s). Full bibliographic details must be given when referring to, or quoting from full items including the author’s name, the title of the work, publication details where relevant (place, publisher, date), pag- ination, and for theses or dissertations the awarding institution, the degree type awarded, and the date of the award. If you believe that any material held in the repository infringes copyright law, please contact the Repository Team at Middlesex University via the following email address: [email protected] The item will be removed from the repository while any claim is being investigated.
    [Show full text]
  • Limitation Act 1980
    Changes to legislation: There are outstanding changes not yet made by the legislation.gov.uk editorial team to Limitation Act 1980. Any changes that have already been made by the team appear in the content and are referenced with annotations. (See end of Document for details) DISCLAIMER: As Member States provide national legislations, hyperlinks and explanatory notes (if any), UNESCO does not guarantee their accuracy, nor their up-dating on this web site, and is not liable for any incorrect information. COPYRIGHT: All rights reserved.This information may be used only for research, educational, legal and non- commercial purposes, with acknowledgement of UNESCO Cultural Heritage Laws Database as the source (© UNESCO). Limitation Act 1980 1980 CHAPTER 58 An Act to consolidate the Limitation Acts 1939 to 1980. [13th November 1980] Annotations: Modifications etc. (not altering text) C1 Act extended by Water Act 1981 (c. 12, SIF 130), s. 6(4) C2 Act amended (1.5.1994) by Environmental Protection Act 1990 (c. 43, SIF 46:4), s. 73(9)(c); S.I. 1994/1096, art.2(1) Act amended (31.1.1997) by 1996 c. 23, s. 14(1) (with s. 81(2)); S.I. 1996/3146, art. 3 C3 Act modified (E.W.) (1.12.1991) by Water Industry Act 1991 (c. 56, SIF 130), ss. 209(4), 223(2) (with ss. 82(3), 186(1), 222(1), Sch. 14 para. 6) Act applied with modifications by Water Resources Act 1991 (c. 57, SIF 130), s. 208(4)(with ss. 16(6), 179, 222(3), 224(1), 225(4), Sch.
    [Show full text]
  • Effectiveness Study of the Dangerous Wild Animals Act 1976
    DEFRA RESEARCH CONTRACT: CR0246 June 2001 Effectiveness Study of the Dangerous Wild Animals Act 1976 A.G. Greenwood MA, VetMB, FIBiol, MRCVS P.A. Cusdin BSc.(Hons), GIBiol, VN M. Radford LLB* International Zoo Veterinary Group, Keighley Business Centre, South Street, Keighley, West Yorkshire BD21 1AG *University of Aberdeen, School of Law, Taylor Building, Old Aberdeen AB24 3UB Executive Summary The Dangerous Wild Animals Act 1976 was intended to regulate the keeping of certain kinds of dangerous wild animals in order to protect the public. This review was commissioned to determine the effectiveness of the Act, as currently administered, in achieving its aims. A major component of this review involved a questionnaire based survey of all 410 local authorities in England and Wales. Wide consultation with individuals and organisations with an interest in the Act was also carried out. Control of the Act was transferred in February 1980 from the Home Office to the Department of the Environment (now the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA)). The Schedule to the Act has been modified on a number of occasions; most notably, in 1984, when the Department appeared to change its listing policy to include animals with the potential to be dangerous, without requiring their actual danger to be established. The 1984 Schedule is now considered by many respondents to be out of date; some of the animals included are not perceived to be dangerous by many animal keepers. There have been some changes to the taxonomy of listed animals, and these must be corrected in the Schedule to avoid legal dispute.
    [Show full text]
  • English Law Under Two Elizabeths Sir John Baker Frontmatter More Information
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-83796-5 — English Law Under Two Elizabeths Sir John Baker Frontmatter More Information ENGLISH LAW UNDER TWO ELIZABETHS Comparative legal history is generally understood to involve the comparison of legal systems in different countries. This is an experiment in a different kind of comparison. The legal world of the first Elizabethans is separated from that of today by nearly half a millennium. But the past is not a wholly different country. The common law is still, in an organic sense, the same common law as it was in Tudor times and Parliament is legally the same Parliament. The concerns of Tudor lawyers turn out to resonate with those of the present and this book concentrates on three of them: access to justice, in terms of both cost and public awareness; the respective roles of common law and legislation; and the means of protecting the rule of law through the courts. Central to the story is the development of judicial review in the time of Elizabeth I. sir john baker is Emeritus Downing Professor of the Laws of England, University of Cambridge. His recent publications include The Reinvention of Magna Carta 1216–1616 (Cambridge, 2017) and Collected Papers on English Legal History (Cambridge, 2013). © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-83796-5 — English Law Under Two Elizabeths Sir John Baker Frontmatter More Information © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-83796-5 — English
    [Show full text]
  • Cats and the Law: a Report for International Cat Care (Icatcare) (Formerly the Feline Advisory Bureau (FAB))
    Cats and the Law: A Report for International Cat Care (iCatCare) (formerly the Feline Advisory Bureau (FAB)) Dr. Angus Nurse and Diane Ryland School of Law Middlesex University The Burroughs Hendon NW4 4BT Lincoln Law School University of Lincoln Brayford Pool Lincoln LN6 7TS For: iCatCare Att. Claire Bessant 12 October 2011 (Revised March - September 2012) (April – September 2013) The authors wish to thank Daniel Mills and Claire Bessant for discussing with us issues raised by this report, and other members of the Cat Group for commenting on our provisional views before we finalised this report. The project originated in Lincoln Law School but the conclusions are, of course, ours. While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of this report, it is not intended to be a substitute for, or intended to be relied upon as, formal legal advice. Lincoln Law School, Middlesex School of Law - A Report for International Cat Care 2 CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 4 1.1 Overview 1.2 Research Outline 2. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 9 3. RESEARCHING CATS AND THE LAW 11 3.1 Researching the Perspectives 3.2 Some General Perspectives on Cats and the Law 3.3 Summary of the Research Approach 4. PERSPECTIVES ON CAT OWNERSHIP 17 4.1 Ambiguities Concerning Ownership 4.2 Cats as Property 4.3 Sale of Goods and Legal Control of Cat Breeding 4.4 Civil Liability for Cats 4.5 Provisional Conclusions on Cat Ownership, Responsibility and Liability 5. ANIMAL WELFARE LAW AND CATS 45 5.1 Animal Welfare Law in the UK 5.2 Animal Welfare as Criminal Law: Animal Welfare Offences 5.3 DEFRA’s Code of Practice on the Welfare of Cats 5.4 Re-homing 5.5 The Special Status of Cats in Scientific Procedures and Vivisection Law Lincoln Law School, Middlesex School of Law - A Report for International Cat Care 3 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Modernising English Land Law
    International Law Research; Vol. 8, No. 1; 2019 ISSN 1927-5234 E-ISSN 1927-5242 Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education Modernising English Land Law Graham McBain1,2 1 Peterhouse, Cambridge, UK 2 Harvard Law School, USA Correspondence: Graham McBain, 21 Millmead Terrace, Guildford, Surrey GU2 4AT, UK. E-mail: [email protected] Received: January 22, 2019 Accepted: February 28, 2019 Online Published: March 5, 2019 doi:10.5539/ilr.v8n1p30 URL: https://doi.org/10.5539/ilr.v8n1p30 1. INTRODUCTION At present, the legal situation in respect of land in England and Wales is confusing. Title to most land in England and Wales is now registered. However, title to some 15% (or less) is still governed by older legal principles, including the need for title deeds. Further, there are many antiquated pieces of legislation relating to land still existing - various pieces of which are obsolete and others which should be re-stated in modern language. For a list of existing land legislation, see Appendices A-B. Antiquated (and obsolete) land legislation complicates the legal position as well as prevents the consolidation of English land law. Such has major financial implications since a clearer, consolidated, land law would help speed up land sales - including house purchases - and reduce costs for businesses and individuals. Also, old laws can (often) be a ‘trap for the unwary.’1 The purpose of this article is to consider various ancient pieces of land legislation and to argue that they should be repealed. In particular, this article argues for the repeal of the following: Inclosure Acts.
    [Show full text]
  • Fisheries Law in Action
    FISHERIES LAW IN ACTION: An exploration of legal pathways to a better managed marine environment Thomas Philip Sebastian Appleby A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the University of the West of England for the degree of Doctorate by Publication 5th March 2015 Save for any express acknowledgements or reference cited in the work, I confirm that the intellectual content of the work is the result of my own efforts and no other person. The right of Thomas Philip Sebastian Appleby to be identified as author is asserted in accordance with ss. 77 and 78 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. At this date copyright is owned by the author. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS My supervision team: Professor David Proverbs, Dr Colin Booth and Professor Chad Staddon; my internal examiners: Professor Katie Williams and Dr Onita Das; Dr Jim Mason; Marcus Grant; Dr Mark Everard; Dr Benjamin Pontin; Dr Margherita Pieraccini and Chris Willmore of Bristol University; Corrie Ferguson; Dr Peter Jones of University College London; the late Richard St. George and Ian Roderick of the Schumacher Society; Andy King; Howard Wood, Don and Kathleen MacNeish, Sally and John Campbell, Tom Vella-Boyle and Andrew Binnie of COAST; Doug and Rosie Anderson; Charles Clover, Marina Vaughan-Spitzy, Chris Gorrell Barnes, George Duffield, Rachel Etherington and Cindy Forde of the Blue Marine Foundation; Dr Bob Earll; Dr Jean-Luc Solandt and Melissa Moore of the Marine Conservation Society; Sandy Luk of Client Earth; David Hart QC; Terry Portman of Scott Trawlers;
    [Show full text]
  • Laboratory Animal Law: Legal Control of the Use of Animals in Research
    Laboratory Animal Law: Legal Control of the Use of Animals in Research Second Edition Kevin Dolan SThL( JusCan), BD, DipLaw, FIAT Laboratory Animal Law: Legal Control of the Use of Animals in Research Second Edition Kevin Dolan SThL( JusCan), BD, DipLaw, FIAT © 2007 by Blackwell Publishing Ltd Blackwell Publishing editorial offices: Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 9600 Garsington Road, Oxford OX4 2DQ, UK Tel: +44 (0)1865 776868 Blackwell Publishing Professional, 2121 State Avenue, Ames, Iowa 50014-8300, USA Tel: +1 515 292 0140 Blackwell Publishing Asia Pty Ltd, 550 Swanston Street, Carlton, Victoria 3053, Australia Tel: +61 (0)3 8359 1011 The right of the Author to be identified as the Author of this Work has been asserted in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, except as permitted by the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, without the prior permission of the publisher. First edition published 2000 by Blackwell Science Ltd Second edition published 2007 by Blackwell Publishing Ltd ISBN: 978-1-4051-6282-1 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Dolan, Kevin. Laboratory animal law : legal control of the use of animals in research / Kevin Dolan. — 2nd ed. p. ; cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN: 978-1-4051-6282-1 (pbk. : alk. paper) 1. Laboratory animals—Law and legislation—Great Britain. 2. Animal experimentation—Law and legislation—Great Britain. I. Title. [DNLM: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • 4FFLK904: Public Law | King's College London
    09/26/21 4FFLK904: Public Law | King's College London 4FFLK904: Public Law View Online ‘Act of Settlement (1700).’ 1700. National Archives. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/aep/Will3/12-13/2/contents. ‘Act of Union 1707.’ n.d. UK Parliament. http://www.parliament.uk/about/living-heritage/evolutionofparliament/legislativescrutiny/ac t-of-union-1707/. A, Dicey. 1885a. An Introduction to the Study of the Law and the Constitution 10th Edition. ———. 1885b. An Introduction to the Study of the Law and the Constitution 10th Edition. Alder, John, Michael Haley, Barry Hough, and Richard Mullender. 2002. General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law. Fourth edition. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. http://kcl.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=296415. ‘Animals Act 1971.’ n.d. National Archives. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1971/22. ‘Anti-Terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001.’ n.d. National Archives. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2001/24/contents. ‘A & Ors v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] UKHL 56.’ 16ADa. http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/2004/56.html. ———. 16ADb. http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/2004/56.html. ‘Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation [1947] EWCA Civ 1 (10 November 1947).’ 10AD. http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/1947/1.html. ‘Attorney General v De Keyser’s Royal Hotel Ltd [1920] UKHL 1.’ 10ADa. http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/1920/1.html. ———. 10ADb. http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/1920/1.html. ‘Balfour Declaration 1926.’ n.d. Imperial Conference. http://www.foundingdocs.gov.au/resources/transcripts/cth11_doc_1926.pdf.
    [Show full text]
  • Statute Law Repeals: Consultation Paper Civil and Criminal Justice
    Statute Law Repeals: Consultation Paper Civil and Criminal Justice SLR 03/10: Closing date for responses – 29 October 2010 BACKGROUND NOTES ON STATUTE LAW REPEALS (SLR) What is it? 1. Our SLR work involves repealing statutes that are no longer of practical utility. The purpose is to modernise and simplify the statute book, thereby reducing its size and thus saving the time of lawyers and others who use it. This in turn helps to avoid unnecessary costs. It also stops people being misled by obsolete laws that masquerade as live law. If an Act features still in the statute book and is referred to in text-books, people reasonably enough assume that it must mean something. Who does it? 2. Our SLR work is carried out by the Law Commission and the Scottish Law Commission pursuant to section 3(1) of the Law Commissions Act 1965. Section 3(1) imposes a duty on both Commissions to keep the law under review “with a view to its systematic development and reform, including in particular ... the repeal of obsolete and unnecessary enactments, the reduction of the number of separate enactments and generally the simplification and modernisation of the law”. Statute Law (Repeals) Bill 3. Implementation of the Commissions’ SLR proposals is by means of special Statute Law (Repeals) Bills. 18 such Bills have been enacted since 1965 repealing more than 2000 whole Acts and achieving partial repeals in thousands of others. Broadly speaking the remit of a Statute Law (Repeals) Bill extends to any enactment passed at Westminster. Accordingly it is capable of repealing obsolete statutory text throughout the United Kingdom (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Statute Law and Common Law 1
    viü Contents 7 Torts 128 1 Statute law and common law 1_. The _Iiability ~or tort. 2. General conditions ofliability (mtentiOn, mottve and malice. Negligencc. Liability wirhaut intention or negligence. Darnage and damages). 3. Termination of liability (Death of eirher pany. Limitation of actions). 4. Specific torts (Wrongs to personal safety and liberty. Defamation. Abusc of legal proceedings. Interference with family and contractual relations, business and employment. Fraud. Torrs in respect of property). 8 Crimes 146 1. LAW AND LAWS. We commonly speak ofbothlaw andlaws-the 1. Sources of criminallaw. 2. Civil and criminallaw cantras red. English Law, or the Laws of England; and these terms, though 3. Classi:fication of crimes and offences. 4. General principles. 5. High not used with precision, point to two different aspects under treason. 6. I~citement to disaffection. 7. Unlawful assembly and riot. which legal science may be approached. The laws of a country are 8. Preservatmn of order on the occasion of public processions and thought of as separate, distinct, individual rules; the law of a public meetings. 9. Libel, sediüon, andobscenity. 10. Homicide. 11. Offences againsr properry. country, however much we may analyse it into separate rules, is something more than the mere sum of such rules. lt is rather a Notes 163 whole, a system which orders our conduct; in which the separate Further reading 166 rules have their place and their relation to each other and to the Index whole; which is never completely exhausted by any analysis, how­ 171 ever far the analysis may be pushed, and however much the analy­ sis may be necessary to our understanding of the whole.
    [Show full text]
  • SQE2 Sample Question and Discussion of Answer
    SQE2 sample question and discussion of answer Legal research (Criminal Litigation) November 2020 Candidates will undertake 16 assessments in SQE2. To pass SQE2 candidates will need to obtain the overall pass mark for SQE2. This sample question and discussion of answer is an example of a legal research assessment. This is a computer-based assessment and candidates will have 60 minutes to complete the task. For further detail see the SQE2 Assessment Specification. Please note that the sample questions are provided to give an indication of the type of tasks that candidates could be set. They do not represent all the material that will be covered in SQE2. Future questions may not take exactly the same format. Question and additional candidate papers Sample: legal research (question & additional candidate papers) Page 2 of 42 Email to Candidate From: Partner Sent: 11 December 202# To: Candidate Subject: Keith Foster A new client, Keith Foster, telephoned me today. Keith is very concerned about an incident which occurred yesterday involving his pet dog Digger. He explained that he answered the door to his house to a postman who was delivering a parcel. When he opened the door, Digger ran out of the house and attacked the postman in the front garden. The postman tried to fend off the dog but sustained a bite wound on his arm. Keith tried to call off and restrain the dog, but the dog continued to attack the postman. It was only when the postman managed to kick the dog that Keith was able to put him back inside the house.
    [Show full text]