Bryan Pringle v. William Adams Jr et al Doc. 160 1 DONALD A. MILLER (SB N 228753)
[email protected] 2 BARRY I. SLOTNICK ( Pro Hac Vice )
[email protected] 3 TAL E. DICKSTEIN ( Pro Hac Vice )
[email protected] 4 LOEB & LOEB LLP 10100 Santa Monica Boulevard, Suite 2200 5 Los Angeles, California 90067-4120 Telephone: 310-282-2000 6 Facsimile: 310-282-2200 7 Attorneys for SHAPIRO, BERNSTEIN & CO., INC., FREDERIC 8 RIESTERER, AND DAVID GUETTA 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 SOUTHERN DIVISION 13 BRYAN PRINGLE, an individual, ) Case No. SACV 10 -1656 JST(RZx) ) 14 Plaintiff, ) Hon. Josephine Staton Tucker ) Courtroom 10A 15 v. ) ) 16 WILLIAM ADAMS, JR.; STACY ) STATEMENT OF FERGUSON; ALLAN PINEDA; and ) UNCONTROVERTED FACTS AND 17 JAIME GOMEZ, all individually and ) CONCLUSIONS OF LAW IN collectively as the music group The ) SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR 18 Black Eyed Peas, et al., ) SUMMARY JUDGMENT BY ) DEFENDANTS SHAPIRO, 19 Defendants. ) BERNSTEIN & CO, INC., ) FREDERIC RIESTERER AND 20 ) DAVID GUETTA ) 21 ) Complaint Filed: October 28, 2010 ) Trial Date: February 28, 2012 22 ) Hearing Date: December 19, 2011 10:00 AM 23 24 25 26 27 28 DEFENDANTS’ STATEMENT OF NY987153.4 UNCONTROVERTED FACTS AND 217131-10001 CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Dockets.Justia.com 1 Pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Central 2 District of California Local Rule 56-1, and the Court’s Initial Standing Order at 3 11(c)(i), Defendants Shapiro, Bernstein & Co, Inc. (“Shapiro Bernstein”), Frederic 4 Riesterer and David Guetta (collectively, “Defendants”) respectfully submit this 5 Statement of Uncontroverted Facts and Conclusions of Law in Support of their 6 Motion for Summary Judgment.