Clark County Environmentally Sensitive Lands Double Canyon !( Arrow Canyon !( !( Moapa Muddy Spring Bunkerville

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Mesquite Clark County Environmentally Sensitive Lands Double Canyon !( Arrow Canyon !( !( Moapa Muddy Spring Bunkerville Moapa Valley ESL - Priority 1 Hidden Forest Cabin !( Logandale Indian Springs Weiser Bowl Overton ESL - Priority 2 !( !( Moapa Indian Springs Pueblo Grande de Nevada Tribal Lands !( ESL - Priority 3 The Narrows !( ESL - Priority 4 Fossil Ridge !( Devils Throat Mud Spring Copper Spring !( !( Willow Spring Corn Creek Campsite !( !( !( ESL - Priority 5 Gass Peak Lee Canyon !( !( Marble Quarry ESL - Priority 6 Charcoal Kilns Las Vegas Paiute !( Muddy Mountains !( Mt. Charleston Tribal Lands !( !( Lower Kyle Canyon Horse Spring !( Bitter Spring ESL - Priority 7 !( Ca!(mp Lee Canyon !( Mary Jane Falls !( !(Big Falls Kyle Canyon Gold Butte !( !( !( Charleston Peak !( Lee Spring Red Stone BLM Disposal Areas !( Gypsum Cave !( !( Griffith Peak !( Bowl of Fire !( Great Unconformity Overthrust !( Non-ESL Administrative Areas !( !( !( Calico Hills Coal Spring !( Bonelli Peak !( Lava Butte !( !( !( Red Rock Rainbow Gardens !( !( Boulder City Conservation Easement Willow Spring Red Rock !( Sandstone Ranch Scenic Highways and Federal Byways !( !( Oliver Ranch !( Mountain Spring River Mountain Hoover Dam Hoover Dam !( !( !( !( Aesthetic,Historic and Cultural Sites Potosi !( Mountain Springs Mt. Potosi Black Mountain !( Black Canyon !( Keystone Spring !( Bird Spring !( Shenandoah Peak !( Goodsprings Sandy Valley !( Columbia Pass Eldorado Canyon !( Devil Peak McClanahan Spring Keyhole Canyon !( !( McCullough Spring !( !( Oro Hanna Spring !( Highland Spring !( Cow Spring !( Wild Horse Spring Date: Jauary 29, 2004 !( Joshua Forest !( Crescent Peak !( 0 39,990 79,980 119,970 159,960 Searchlight SCALE IN FEET Source: Clark County Central Repository Spirit Mountain This information is for display purposes only. !( Christmas Tree Pass !( No liability is assumed as to the accuracy of the data delineated hereon. Laughlin Fort Mohave Tribal Lands \\ccgis1\gisdata\prcomp\ArcMap\cpPlan_Maps\ESL_Priority.

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Southern US 95 & US 93
UNLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE & PLANNINGLV RESEARCH CORRIDOR PLAN INCLUDES US 95 SOUTH FROM RAILROAD PASS TO THE CALIFORNIA STATE LINE, US 93 TO Southern US 95 and US 93 HOOVER DAM AND US outhern 95 and 93 95 NORTH OF I-215 TO THE CLARK COUNTY LINE WEST OF INDIAN landscapelandscape andand aestheticsaesthetics corridorcorridor planplan SPRINGS DESIGN WORKSHOP PLACES Sand County Studios JW Zunino & Associates CH2MHill December 15, 2006 Southern US 95 and US 93 corridor plan MESSAGE FROM THE GOVERNOR OF NEVADA MESSAGE FROM THE DIRECTOR OF NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION On June 6, 2002, the Nevada Department of Transportation adopted Landscape and aesthetics are an integral part of the design in as policy, “Pattern and Palette of Place: A Landscape and Aesthetics building and retrofitting our highway system. This Landscape and Master Plan for the Nevada State Highway System.” The second phase Aesthetics Corridor Plan for US 95 and US 93 in Southern Nevada of planning is complete. The Landscape and Aesthetics Corridor helps realize our vision for the future appearance of our highways. Plan represents a significant step forward for the Landscape and The plan will provide the guidance for our own design teams, and Aesthetics program created by the Master Plan because it involves it will help Nevada’s citizens participate in formulating context- local public agencies and citizens in the planning process. Now, sensitive solutions for today’s transportation needs. Together, Nevada’s highways truly represent the State and its people. The we will ensure our highways reflect Nevada’s distinctive heritage, Corridor Plan will be the primary management tool for use in landscape, and culture.
[Show full text]
People of Snowy Mountain, People of the River: a Multi-Agency Ethnographic Overview and Compendium Relating to Tribes Associated with Clark County, Nevada
Portland State University PDXScholar Anthropology Faculty Publications and Presentations Anthropology 2012 People of Snowy Mountain, People of the River: A Multi-Agency Ethnographic Overview and Compendium Relating to Tribes Associated with Clark County, Nevada Douglas Deur Portland State University, [email protected] Deborah Confer University of Washington Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/anth_fac Part of the Social and Cultural Anthropology Commons, and the Sustainability Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Citation Details Deur, Douglas and Confer, Deborah, "People of Snowy Mountain, People of the River: A Multi-Agency Ethnographic Overview and Compendium Relating to Tribes Associated with Clark County, Nevada" (2012). Anthropology Faculty Publications and Presentations. 98. https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/anth_fac/98 This Report is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Anthropology Faculty Publications and Presentations by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. Pacific West Region: Social Science Series National Park Service Publication Number 2012-01 U.S. Department of the Interior PEOPLE OF SNOWY MOUNTAIN, PEOPLE OF THE RIVER: A MULTI-AGENCY ETHNOGRAPHIC OVERVIEW AND COMPENDIUM RELATING TO TRIBES ASSOCIATED WITH CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA 2012 Douglas Deur, Ph.D. and Deborah Confer LAKE MEAD AND BLACK CANYON Doc Searls Photo, Courtesy Wikimedia Commons
[Show full text]
Big Springs Ethnographic Assessment
Pah ¡chi (From Big Spring Running Down) ig Springs Ethnographic Assessment US -J5 Corridor Study OURCE GROUP REPORT NO. 34 Prepared by: Nevada ` Department of Transportation Division of Environmental Services and Federal Highway Administration Environmental Consultants: Louis Berger & Associates, Inc. Las Vegas, Nevada September 1998 THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA Pah hu wichi(From Big Spring Running Down): Big Spring Ethnographic Assessment US 95 Corridor Study September 1998 BUREAU OF APPLIED RESEARCH IN ANTHROPOLOGY TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Tables v List of Figures vii Acknowledgments vii Foreword x Chapter One Study Overview 1 Brief Description of the Project 1 Cultural Affiliation and Involved American Indian Tribes 2 The Bureau of Applied Research in Anthropology 3 Native American Cultural Resource Revitalization 3 University of Arizona Study Team 4 Selection of Interview Sites 5 Interview Forms and Analysis 10 Data Analysis 10 Chronology of Work 13 Daily Schedule 13 Chapter Two Contextualizing Indian Opinions 15 Paiute Views of Their Culture 15 Creation Stories 18 Traditional Southern Paiute Political Units 20 The High Chiefs 20 Chiefs of Alliance 21 Disease and Sociopolitical Disruption 22 1840 - 1875 Depopulation 24 1875 -1900 Depopulation 24 Twentieth Century High Chiefs 26 Chief Tecopa 26 Continuities in Southern Paiute Political Leadership 26 Chief Penance 26 Chief Skinner 27 Technical Terms 28 Technical Term #1: Cultural Affiliation 28 Traditional Period 28 Aboriginal Period 29 Historic Period 29 Ownership of Land 30 Response
[Show full text]
U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management
U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Final Environmental Assessment DOI-BLM-NV0S010-2009-1014-EA May 2016 Eastern Nevada Transmission Project APPLICANT Silver State Energy Association GENERAL LOCATION Clark County, Nevada BLM CASE FILE SERIAL NUMBER N-086357 PREPARING OFFICE U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Las Vegas Field Office 4701 N. Torrey Pines Drive Las Vegas, NV 89130 Phone: (702) 515-5172 Fax: (702) 515-5010 This page intentionally left blank. Table of Contents Chapter 1 - Purpose and Need ...................................................................................................1 1.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................1 1.2 Project Background ........................................................................................................1 1.3 Purpose and Need for Action .........................................................................................2 1.4 Decisions to be Made .....................................................................................................7 1.5 BLM Policies, Plans, Authorizing Actions, and Permit Requirements .........................7 Chapter 2 - Proposed Action and Alternatives ........................................................................9 2.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................9 2.1.1 Regulatory Framework for Alternatives
[Show full text]
Utah Geological Association Publication 30.Pub
Utah Geological Association Publication 30 - Pacific Section American Association of Petroleum Geologists Publication GB78 239 CENOZOIC EVOLUTION OF THE NORTHERN COLORADO RIVER EXTEN- SIONAL CORRIDOR, SOUTHERN NEVADA AND NORTHWEST ARIZONA JAMES E. FAULDS1, DANIEL L. FEUERBACH2*, CALVIN F. MILLER3, 4 AND EUGENE I. SMITH 1Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology, University of Nevada, Mail Stop 178, Reno, NV 89557 2Department of Geology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242 *Now at Exxon Mobil Development Company, 16825 Northchase Drive, Houston, TX 77060 3Department of Geology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235 4Department of Geoscience, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV 89154 ABSTRACT The northern Colorado River extensional corridor is a 70- to 100-km-wide region of moderately to highly extended crust along the eastern margin of the Basin and Range province in southern Nevada and northwestern Arizona. It has occupied a criti- cal structural position in the western Cordillera since Mesozoic time. In the Cretaceous through early Tertiary, it stood just east and north of major fold and thrust belts and also marked the northern end of a broad, gently (~15o) north-plunging uplift (Kingman arch) that extended southeastward through much of central Arizona. Mesozoic and Paleozoic strata were stripped from the arch by northeast-flowing streams. Peraluminous 65 to 73 Ma granites were emplaced at depths of at least 10 km and exposed in the core of the arch by earliest Miocene time. Calc-alkaline magmatism swept northward through the northern Colorado River extensional corridor during early to middle Miocene time, beginning at ~22 Ma in the south and ~12 Ma in the north.
[Show full text]
National Speleologi'c-Al Society
Bulletin Number Five NATIONAL SPELEOLOGI'C-AL SOCIETY n this Issue: CAVES IN WORLD HISTORY . B ~ BERT MORGAN THE GEM OF CAVES' . .. .. • B DALE WHITE CA VE FAUN A, with Recent Additions to the Lit ture Bl J. A. FOWLER CAT ALOG OF THE SOCIETY LJBR R . B)' ROBERT S. BRAY OCTOBER, 1943 PRJ E 1.0 0 . ------------------------------------------- .-'~ BULLETIN OF THE NATIONAL SPELEOLOGICAL SOCIETY Issue Number Five October, 1943 750 Copies. 64 Pages Published sporadically by THE NATIONAL SPELEOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 510 Scar Building, Washington, D. c., ac $1.00 per copy. Copyrighc, 1943, by THE NATIONAL SPELEOLOGICAL SOCIETY. EDITOR: DON BLOCH 5606 Sonoma Road, Bethesda-14, Maryland ASSOCIATE EDITORS: ROBERT BRAY WILLIAM J. STEPHENSON J. S. PETRIE OFFICERS AND COMMITTEE CHAIRMEN *WM. ]. STEPHENSON J. S. PETR'IE *LEROY FOOTE F. DURR President Vice·Prcsidet1l & Secretary Treasurer Pina~iaJ Sect'eIM"J 7108 Prospect Avenue 400 S. Glebe Road R. D. 3 2005 Kansas Avenue Richmond, Va. Arlin-glon, Va. Waterbury, Conn. Richmond, Va. Archeology Fauna Hydrology Programs &. Activities FLOYD BARLOGA JAMES FOWLER DR. WM. M. MCGILL DR. JAMES BENN 202·8 Lee Boulevard 6420 14th Street 6 Wayside Place, University U. S. Nat. Museum Arlington, Va. Washington, D . C. Charlottesville, Va. Washington, D. C. Bibliography &. Library Finance Mapping PubliCity *ROBERT BRAY *l.EROY FOOTB GBORGE CRABB *·Lou KLBWEJ.t R. F. D. 2 R. F. D. 3 P. O. Box 791 Toledo Blade Herndon, Va. Waterbury, Conn. Blacksburg, Va. Toledo, Ohio BuIletin &. Publications Folklore Metnbership DON BLOCH "'CLAY PERRY SAM ALLBN RECORDS 5606 Sonoma Road East Acres 1226 Wel.Jesley Avenue *FLORENCE WHITLI!Y Deorhesda, Md.
[Show full text]
Gained, but Also for the Geological Chronology-Particularly for the Record of Lake Lahontan Fluctuation and Deposition-It Was Anticipated Would Be Revealed
103 IV. Projectile Points from Hidden Cave (NV-Ch-16) Churchill County, Nevada Norman L. Roust and C. W. Clewlow, Jr. In the summer of 1951, the site of Hidden Cave was excavated by N. L. Roust and G. L. Grosscup, then of the University of California. This site, located 4104 feet above sea level in an arroyo at the southwestern extension of the Stillwater Range and some seventeen miles southeast of Fallon, Nevada., was chosen at the suggestion of Professor Robert F. Heizer and Dr. Roger Morrison, not only for the archaeological information to be gained, but also for the geological chronology-particularly for the record of Lake Lahontan fluctuation and deposition-it was anticipated would be revealed. While the excavations were rewarding both archaeologically and geologically, various circumstances have intervened so that the full report of the excavation has not yet been published, although the data are on file in the manuscript records of the Archaeological Research Fpcility, Berkeley (Roust and Grosscup n.d.). There have been, however, a number of published reports on various aspects of the work accomplished. Preliminary information on the project was provided by Grosscup (1956:58-64). In 1967, an analysis of human copro- lites from Hidden Cave and other sites in the Carson -Humboldt sink area was conducted and the results reported (Ambro 1967; Roust 1967). Two fish nets from Hidden Cave were described by Ambro (1966), and various references have been made to the projectile point sequence (Clewlow 1967; O'Connell 1967). It is the aim of this paper to present a full report on the point sequence at Hidden Cave as recorded at that time.
[Show full text]
FAA Letter to Nevada State Historic
Las Vegas Metroplex Section 106 Consultation Attachment A: Location of the Revised Area of Potential Effect (Based on the Reportable Noise Grid Points) Lincoln LEGEND Evenly-Spaced Grid Centroid Exposed to a DNL 45 to 60 dB with a DNL 5 dB Nye Increase 93 ¤£ Area of Potential Effect ¤£95 General Study Area Boundary 15 Z Study Airports Nevada ¨¦§ US and Interstate Highways Inyo State Boundary KVGT Water Clark ¨¦§515 General Study Area Counties KLAS ¨¦§515 Arizona Counties KHND California Counties Nevada Counties ¤£93 Mohave Arizona ¤£95 ¨¦§15 40 California ¨¦§ 15 ¨¦§ ¤£93 San Bernardino 15 15 ¨¦§ ¨¦§ ¤£95 Notes: 40 ¨¦§ KHND Henderson Executive Airport KLAS Mc Carran International Airport KLSV Nellis Air Force Base ¨¦§40 KVGT North Las Vegas Airport ¤£95 Coordinate System: GCS WGS 1984 Datum: WGS 1984 Scale: 1:1,392,546 010205 Miles ± Document Path: D:\Documents-Data\OAPM\LAS\Exhibits\Chapter 5\Exhibit_5_1.mxd Sources: Road Network File, U.S. Census Bureau, 2017 (2017 TIGER/Line Shapefiles (machine-readable data files), County Boundary File, US Census Bureau, (2017 TIGER/Line Shapefiles (machine-readable data files); World Imagery, Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community.Airports file, Federal Aviation Administration, 2018 Coded Instrument Flight Procedures (CIFP). Shaded Relief, 2018. ATAC Corporation, 2018, (2018 General Study Area boundary). Prepared by: ATAC Corporation, November 2019. Attachment A Las Vegas Metroplex Section 106 Consultation Attachment
[Show full text]
U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management
U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Final Environmental Assessment DOI-BLM-NV-S010-2010-0091-EA November 2014 Southern Nevada Intertie Project APPLICANT Great Basin Transmission, LLC GENERAL LOCATION Clark County, Nevada BLM CASE FILE SERIAL NUMBER N-086359 PREPARING OFFICE U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Las Vegas Field Office 4701 N. Torrey Pines Drive Las Vegas, Nevada 89130 Phone: (702) 515-5172 Fax: (702) 515-5010 This page intentionally left blank. TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1. Identifying Information ...................................................................................... 1-2 1.1.1. Title, EA Number, and Type of Project .............................................. 1-2 1.1.2. Location of Proposed Action ............................................................... 1-2 1.1.3. Name and Location of Preparing Office ............................................. 1-2 1.1.4. Identify the Case File Number ............................................................ 1-2 1.1.5. Applicant Name ................................................................................... 1-2 1.2. Purpose and Need for Action ............................................................................. 1-2 1.2.1. Background ......................................................................................... 1-2 1.2.2. BLM Purpose and Need .....................................................................
[Show full text]
County Code County Federal Type* PWSID NAME Source Water
Source Water County Federal Assessment Code County Type* PWSID NAME Complete 01 CHURCHILL NC NV0002015 BOBS ROOTBEER DRIVE INN YES 01 CHURCHILL C NV0003068 CARSON RIVER ESTATES YES 01 CHURCHILL NC NV0002017 COLD SPRINGS STATION YES 01 CHURCHILL C NV0000046 COUNTRY CLUB ESTATES YES 01 CHURCHILL C NV0000047 DELUXE MHP YES 01 CHURCHILL C NV0004002 EM BER MOBILE MANOR YES 01 CHURCHILL C NV0000045 FALLON CITY OF YES 01 CHURCHILL NC NV0002016 FALLON GOLF COURSE YES 01 CHURCHILL NC NV0002594 FALLON LIVESTOCK EXCHANGE YES 01 CHURCHILL C NV0000350 FALLON NAVAL AIR STATION YES 01 CHURCHILL NC NV0002534 FALLON RV PARK YES 01 CHURCHILL NC NV0002014 GALLAGHER LIVESTOCK INC YES 01 CHURCHILL NC NV0002587 GAS STORE YES 01 CHURCHILL NC NV0002580 HARMON JUNCTION YES 01 CHURCHILL C NV0002023 HUB TOTEL MHP YES 01 CHURCHILL NC NV0000872 HUB TOTEL RV PARK YES 01 CHURCHILL NTNC NV0000906 JETWAY CHEVROLET YES 01 CHURCHILL NTNC NV0002024 KENNAMETAL INC YES 01 CHURCHILL NC NV0002028 LAHONTAN DAM STATE PARK YES 01 CHURCHILL NC NV0000938 LATTIN FARMS YES 01 CHURCHILL NC NV0002027 MIDDLEGATE STATION YES 01 CHURCHILL NTNC NV0002541 NAS CENTROID EW RANGE YES 01 CHURCHILL NC NV0002034 NDOT TRINITY ROADSIDE PARK RP806CH YES 01 CHURCHILL NC NV0002029 OASIS BOWL YES 01 CHURCHILL C NV0000051 OASIS MHP YES 01 CHURCHILL C NV0000052 OK MOBILE HOME PARK YES 01 CHURCHILL C NV0000303 OLD RIVER WATER COMPANY YES 01 CHURCHILL C NV0000849 PINE GROVE UTILITY TRUST YES 01 CHURCHILL C NV0000054 R AND M MOBILE HOME PARK YES 01 CHURCHILL NC NV0002536 SALT WELLS VILLA BAR YES 01 CHURCHILL
[Show full text]
Past and Ongoing Shifts in Joshua Tree Distribution Support Future Modeled Range Contraction
Ecological Applications, 21(1), 2011, pp. 137–149 Ó 2011 by the Ecological Society of America Past and ongoing shifts in Joshua tree distribution support future modeled range contraction 1,7 2 3 4 5,8 6 KENNETH L. COLE, KIRSTEN IRONSIDE, JON EISCHEID, GREGG GARFIN, PHILLIP B. DUFFY, AND CHRIS TONEY 1USGS, Colorado Plateau Research Station, P.O. Box 5614, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona 86011 USA 2Merriam-Powell Center for Environmental Research, Northern Arizona University, P.O. Box 4071, Flagstaff, Arizona 86011 USA 3NOAA Earth Systems Research Laboratory, 325 Broadway, Boulder, Colorado 80305 USA 4Institute of the Environment, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85719 USA 5Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and University of California, Merced, California 94550 USA 6USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Missoula, Montana 59808 USA Abstract. The future distribution of the Joshua tree (Yucca brevifolia) is projected by combining a geostatistical analysis of 20th-century climates over its current range, future modeled climates, and paleoecological data showing its response to a past similar climate change. As climate rapidly warmed ;11 700 years ago, the range of Joshua tree contracted, leaving only the populations near what had been its northernmost limit. Its ability to spread northward into new suitable habitats after this time may have been inhibited by the somewhat earlier extinction of megafaunal dispersers, especially the Shasta ground sloth. We applied a model of climate suitability for Joshua tree, developed from its 20th-century range and climates, to future climates modeled through a set of six individual general circulation models (GCM) and one suite of 22 models for the late 21st century.
[Show full text]
Guide to the James B. Wilson Jr. Photographs
Guide to the James B. Wilson Jr. Photographs This finding aid was created by Maryse Lundering-Timpano. This copy was published on August 28, 2019. Persistent URL for this finding aid: http://n2t.net/ark:/62930/f1x90k © 2019 The Regents of the University of Nevada. All rights reserved. University of Nevada, Las Vegas. University Libraries. Special Collections and Archives. Box 457010 4505 S. Maryland Parkway Las Vegas, Nevada 89154-7010 [email protected] Guide to the James B. Wilson Jr. Photographs Table of Contents Summary Information ..................................................................................................................................... 3 Biographical Note ............................................................................................................................................ 3 Scope and Contents Note ................................................................................................................................ 4 Arrangement .................................................................................................................................................... 4 Administrative Information ............................................................................................................................. 4 Related Materials ............................................................................................................................................. 5 Names and Subjects .......................................................................................................................................
[Show full text]