An Initiative to Clean Label: Can We Replace Dough Strengtheners In

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

An Initiative to Clean Label: Can We Replace Dough Strengtheners In AN INITIATIVE TO CLEAN LABEL: CAN WE REPLACE DOUGH STRENGTHENERS IN BREAD FORMULATIONS A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the North Dakota State University of Agriculture and Applied Science By Md Mahfuzur Rahman In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Major Program: Cereal Science April 2018 Fargo, North Dakota North Dakota State University Graduate School Title AN INITIATIVE TO CLEAN LABEL: CAN WE REPLACE DOUGH STRENGTHENERS IN BREAD FORMULATIONS By Md Mahfuzur Rahman The Supervisory Committee certifies that this disquisition complies with North Dakota State University’s regulations and meets the accepted standards for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE SUPERVISORY COMMITTEE: Dr. Senay Simsek Chair Dr. Frank Manthey Dr. Jae-Bom Ohm Dr. Xinhua Jia Approved: May 02, 2018 06 Dr. Richard D. Horsley Date Department Chair ABSTRACT Dough strengtheners are the most common and largest group of chemicals used in bread formulations. This study evaluated the capability of hard red spring (HRS) wheat flour to replace commercial dough strengtheners in bread production. Doughs were prepared by blending different percentages (10%, 20%, 30% and 40%) of four different HRS wheat flours with hard red winter (HRW) wheat flour. In addition, doughs were prepared by adding ten commercially available additives with HRW wheat flour to compare the dough strengthening ability of HRS wheat flour. All the HRS wheat flour blends had significantly (p<0.05) strong dough rheological characteristics than most of the additives. The 40% blends of HRS wheat cultivar Glenn and Linkert had better bread making quality than other blends and all the additives. The SE-HPLC unextractable protein fractions of these two cultivars also showed a better correlation with bread making properties than all the additives. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost, I would like to thank my advisor and mentor, Dr. Senay Simsek. Thank you very much for accepting me as your student and for your never-ending guidance, encouragement, and support throughout my study. My appreciation extends to all members of my graduate committee: Dr. Frank Manthey, thank you for your advice and support throughout this study and especially writing. Dr. Jae-Bom Ohm, thank you for welcoming me to your laboratories, for your assistance in the statistical analysis and data interpretation. Dr. Xinhua Jia, thank you for your kindness, valuable inputs, and support. Special acknowledgment to DeLane Olsen for her technical assistance and support throughout my thesis experiments. I would also like to acknowledge Kristin Whitney and Stephanie Ness for their technical assistance and support. My thanks extend to my lab-mates, office-mates, and friends for their help and support. My gratitude feelings towards my parents and siblings couldn’t express in words for their support, encouragement, and mentorship, which has helped me immensely in all aspects of my life. Finally, my heartfelt appreciation to my wife Ferdows Ara Parvin, for her patience, inspiration, and support for my graduate education. iv DEDICATION I would like to dedicate this dissertation to my parents who has sacrificed a lot for my education. v TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................................... iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................................... iv DEDICATION ................................................................................................................................ v LIST OF TABLES ......................................................................................................................... ix LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................................ x LIST OF APPENDIX TABLES .................................................................................................... xi LIST OF APPENDIX FIGURES.................................................................................................. xii GENERAL INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................... 1 Overall Objectives ....................................................................................................................... 3 Need Statement ........................................................................................................................... 3 References ................................................................................................................................... 4 CHAPTER 1. LITERATURE REVIEW ........................................................................................ 6 1.1. Bread Production .................................................................................................................. 6 1.2. Ingredients Used in Bread Formulations .............................................................................. 7 1.2.1. Major ingredients used in bread formulations ............................................................... 8 1.2.2. Minor ingredients .......................................................................................................... 9 1.2.3. Micro ingredients......................................................................................................... 10 1.2.4. Bakery improvers ........................................................................................................ 10 1.2.5. Functions dough strengtheners and reaction with protein ........................................... 13 1.2.6. Effect dough additives on dough rheology and loaf volume ....................................... 14 1.3. Health Effect and Controversies with Dough Strengtheners.............................................. 19 1.4. What is Clean Label? ......................................................................................................... 20 1.4.1. What makes a clean label? .......................................................................................... 20 1.4.2. Ingredient selection for clean label .............................................................................. 22 vi 1.5. Wheat Flour Protein and Bread Quality ............................................................................. 23 1.5.1. Dough strengtheners and protein molecular weight .................................................... 26 1.5.2. Protein Molecular weight distribution by SE –HPLC and bread quality .................... 27 1.6. References .......................................................................................................................... 30 CHAPTER 2. REPLACEMENT OF COMMERCIAL DOUGH STRENGTHENERS WITH HARD RED SPRING WHEAT FLOUR .......................................................................... 39 2.1. Abstract .............................................................................................................................. 39 2.2. Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 40 2.3. Materials and Methods ....................................................................................................... 42 2.3.1. Sampling ...................................................................................................................... 42 2.3.2. Proximate composition of flours, dough, and bread crumbs ....................................... 44 2.3.3. Dough rheology measurement ..................................................................................... 44 2.3.4. Baking and bread quality ............................................................................................. 45 2.3.5. Bread firmness ............................................................................................................. 45 2.3.6. Statistical analysis ....................................................................................................... 45 2.4. Results and Discussion ....................................................................................................... 46 2.4.1. Proximate analysis of flour, dough, and bread crumb ................................................. 46 2.4.2. Effect of HRS wheat blends and additives on dough rheology ................................... 46 2.4.3. Correlation between farinograph and extensograph data ............................................ 53 2.4.4. Quality traits of the bread made of HRS wheat flour blends and additives ................ 54 2.4.5. Correlation between dough rheology and bread quality characteristics ...................... 64 2.5. Conclusions ........................................................................................................................ 66 2.6. References .......................................................................................................................... 67 CHAPTER 3. MOLECULAR WEIGHT DISTRIBUTION OF PROTEIN EXTRACTED FROM DOUGH AND BREAD MADE OF HRS WHEAT BLEND AND ADDITIVES, AND ITS CORRELATION WITH DOUGH AND BREAD CHARACTERISTICS ................. 73 vii 3.1. Abstract .............................................................................................................................. 73 3.2. Introduction .......................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Report of the Advisory Group to Recommend Priorities for the IARC Monographs During 2020–2024
    IARC Monographs on the Identification of Carcinogenic Hazards to Humans Report of the Advisory Group to Recommend Priorities for the IARC Monographs during 2020–2024 Report of the Advisory Group to Recommend Priorities for the IARC Monographs during 2020–2024 CONTENTS Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1 Acetaldehyde (CAS No. 75-07-0) ................................................................................................. 3 Acrolein (CAS No. 107-02-8) ....................................................................................................... 4 Acrylamide (CAS No. 79-06-1) .................................................................................................... 5 Acrylonitrile (CAS No. 107-13-1) ................................................................................................ 6 Aflatoxins (CAS No. 1402-68-2) .................................................................................................. 8 Air pollutants and underlying mechanisms for breast cancer ....................................................... 9 Airborne gram-negative bacterial endotoxins ............................................................................. 10 Alachlor (chloroacetanilide herbicide) (CAS No. 15972-60-8) .................................................. 10 Aluminium (CAS No. 7429-90-5) .............................................................................................. 11
    [Show full text]
  • 4.0 Product: Croustilis® Brand: SAF Pro® Date: 09/27/17
    Document: 620-TDS-119 TECHNICAL DATA SHEET Revision: 4.0 Product: Croustilis® Brand: SAF Pro® Date: 09/27/17 Product Description As a dough conditioner, SAF Pro® Croustilis® reduces the formation of blisters and enables the successful production of bakery products. Regulatory Product is produced from materials that are wholesome and free from extraneous matter. Product is prepared following Good Manufacturing Practices, and complies with the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act of 1938, as amended and published in the CFR. Lesaffre Yeast Corporation is the US importer of record for SAF Pro Dough Conditioners manufactured by LIS- France, Cerences, France. LIS-France is included in Lesaffre Yeast Corporation’s Foreign Supplier Verification Program. Ingredient Statement Enriched Wheat Flour, Monoglycerides of Fatty Acids, Ascorbic Acid, Enzymes Manufacturing Process Blending, packaging Applications Baguettes, bagels, pizza crusts, mixes, frozen dough, par baked, retarded doughs, no-time doughs Usage Add directly to the flour at 0.3 – 0.5% of the total flour weight Item Numbers / Packaging Format / Grind / UPC Item Net Wt. Package Form UPC - Case Number 27201 10 kg. Poly-lined corrugated box Powder 0 17929 27201 2 Import / Export Tariff code 2106.90.99.98 Product Specifications Parameter Specification Test Method Ascorbic Acid 2.16-2.64% Internal Method Phc022 Salmonella Negative / 25 gm SMS (BIOMERIEUX), validated AFNOR # AES 10/04 - 05/04 7475 West Main St. Milwaukee, WI 53214 Document: 620-TDS-119 TECHNICAL DATA SHEET Revision: 4.0 Product: Croustilis® Brand: SAF Pro® Date: 09/27/17 Package / Pallet Dimensions Item Case Pallets L W H Cu. Tiers Units/ Cases/ L W H Cu.
    [Show full text]
  • Calcium Peroxide (CP) Azodicarbonamide (ADA)
    Enzymatic Solutions to replace chemicals in wheat flour treatments . Calcium Peroxide (CP) . Azodicarbonamide (ADA) Norman Loop Mühlenchemie GmbH & Co. KG Ahrensburg, Germany LP04012001 Agenda Muehlenchemie Chemical oxidants in flour milling industry Regulatory / Legal status How to replace them? Practical Examples . Calcium Peroxide (CP) Replacement . Azodicarbonamide (ADA) Replacement Conclusion Mühlenchemie: the Flour Company We are an innovative enterprise – present in the market for over 90 years: Mühlenchemie makes good flours even better. Established: 1923 Domicile: Ahrensburg / Hamburg Parent company: Stern-Wywiol Gruppe, Hamburg Specialization: . Flour improvers . Enzymes . Vitamin and mineral premixes . Applications consultancy . Analytical service . Training courses and seminars Mühlenchemie: the Flour Company Market position: World market leader in flour improvers Turnover: approx 150 mill. USD Sales: In more than 110 countries globally Production facilities: Germany, China, India, Mexico, Turkey,USA and Malaysia Our dedication to millers: The FlourWorld Museum: a collection of more than 3,000 flour sacks from the milling industry Chemical oxidants in flour milling industry “Would you eat your yoga mat?” Oxidizing Agents as Flour Improvers Azodicarbonamide (ADA) Calcium peroxide (CP) Chlorine & chlorine dioxide Benzoyl peroxide (BPO) Potassium Bromate 7 Calcium Peroxide (CP) Azodicarbonamide (ADA) Slow oxidizing effect Fast oxidizing effect Improves dough handling properties Improves dough stability (drying effect) Improves
    [Show full text]
  • Potassium Bromate
    POTASSIUM BROMATE VWR International, Pty Ltd Chemwatch: 1484 Issue Date: 25/01/2013 Version No: 6.1.1.1 Print Date: 10/12/2013 Safety Data Sheet according to WHS and ADG requirements S.GHS.AUS.EN SECTION 1 IDENTIFICATION OF THE SUBSTANCE / MIXTURE AND OF THE COMPANY / UNDERTAKING Product Identifier Product name POTASSIUM BROMATE Chemical Name potassium bromate Synonyms Br-K-O3, KBrO3, bromic acid potassium salt Proper shipping name POTASSIUM BROMATE Chemical formula BrHO3.K Other means of identification Not Available CAS number 7758-01-2 Relevant identified uses of the substance or mixture and uses advised against Used as laboratory reagent, oxidising agent, permanent wave compound, maturing agent in flour, dough conditioner and food additive. Bromate is Relevant identified uses converted to bromide in the baking or cooking process, but the levels are not in excess of the natural bromide content of many natural foods., Note: Food additive uses restricted as to proportions used., [~Intermediate ~] Details of the supplier of the safety data sheet Registered company name VWR International, Pty Ltd Unit 1/31 Archimedes Place 4172 QLD Address Australia Telephone 61 7 3009 4100 ; 1300 727 696 Fax 61 7 3009 4199 ; 1300 135 123 Website http://au.vwr.com Email [email protected] Emergency telephone number Association / Organisation Not Available Emergency telephone numbers 61 7 3009 4100 ; 1300 727 696 Other emergency telephone numbers 61 7 3009 4100 ; 1300 727 696 SECTION 2 HAZARDS IDENTIFICATION Classification of the substance or mixture HAZARDOUS CHEMICAL. DANGEROUS GOODS. According to the Model WHS Regulations and the ADG Code.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstract Measurement and Analysis of Bromate Ion
    ABSTRACT MEASUREMENT AND ANALYSIS OF BROMATE ION REDUCTION IN SYNTHETIC GASTRIC JUICE by Jason Dimitrius Keith Bromate ion is a possible carcinogen that is regulated by the US EPA at a Maximum Contamination Level (MCL) of 10 µg/L in drinking water. In order to propose an improved scientifically appropriate bromate ion MCL, a more rigorous scientific methodology is needed for determining low level dose health risks. The objectives of this research project were to measure bromate ion with oxidizing and/or reducing agents typically ingested in foods and drinking water. The loss of bromate ion in HCl is too slow for significant reduction in the stomach. -5 Addition of 10 M H2S, a gastric juice component, decreases the half-life from 153 to 14 minutes. The ingested reducing agents iodide ion, nitrite ion, and iron(II) decrease the lifetime of bromate ion in the stomach. Chlorine, monochloramine, and iron(III) have little actual effect on the lifetime of bromate ion. The measured rates and chemical details of the reactions are discussed. MEASUREMENT AND ANALYSIS OF BROMATE ION REDUCTION IN SYNTHETIC GASTRIC JUICE A Thesis Submitted to the faculty of Miami University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Department of Chemistry by Jason Dimitrius Keith Miami University Oxford, Ohio 2005 Co-Advisor________________ (Dr. Gilbert Gordon) Co-Advisor________________ (Dr. Gilbert E. Pacey) Reader_________________ (Dr. Michael W. Crowder) Reader_________________ (Dr. Hongcai Zhou) TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ii LIST OF TABLES iii LIST OF FIGURES iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS v INTRODUCTION 1 Bromate Ion Chemistry and Human Toxicology 1 Prior Analytical Methodology 6 Objectives 7 METHOD DEVELOPMENT AND ESTABLISHMENT OF PROTOCOLS 7 Solution Preparation 7 Preparation and Measurement of Stock HOCl/ Cl2 and ClNH2 Solutions 11 Measurement of Iron(II) and Iron(III) in Solution 12 Instrumentation.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyright Statement This Copy of the Thesis Has Been Supplied on The
    University of Plymouth PEARL https://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk 04 University of Plymouth Research Theses 01 Research Theses Main Collection 2017 Lactic acid bacteria as bio-preservatives in bakery Role of sourdough systems in the quality, safety and shelf life of bread Koy, Rebaz http://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/9828 University of Plymouth All content in PEARL is protected by copyright law. Author manuscripts are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author. Copyright Statement This copy of the thesis has been supplied on the condition that anyone who consults it is understood to recognise that its copyright rests with its author and that no quotation from the thesis and no information derived from it may be published without the author’s prior consent. Lactic acid bacteria as bio-preservatives in bakery – Role of sourdough systems in the quality, safety and shelf life of bread by Rebaz Aswad Mirza Koy A thesis submitted to Plymouth University in partial fulfilment for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY School of Biological and Marine Sciences Faculty of Science and Engineering August 2017 Lactic acid bacteria as bio-preservatives in bakery – Role of sourdough systems in the quality, safety and shelf life of bread Rebaz Aswad Mirza Koy Abstract Microbial contamination and survival during storage of bread are a cause of both health concerns and economic losses.
    [Show full text]
  • Niaproof ® Calcium Stearoyl Lactylate
    Technical Data Sheet Ref.: 2019_02v3 Niaproof ® Calcium Stearoyl Lactylate Niaproof® Calcium Stearoyl Lactylate is to exceed 0.5 parts for each 100 parts by offered as a white to cream colored powder weight of flour used. CSL is especially grade. preferred in lean hearth bread type formulations as a dough strengthener. PRODUCT PROPERTIES It is also used as a whipping agent in liquid and frozen egg white at a level not to Chemical Calcium Stearoyl-2- exceed 0.05 percent. In dried egg white at a name Lactylate level not to exceed 0.5 percent. In whipped Formula C48H86CaO12 vegetable oil topping at a level not to exceed 0.3 percent of the weight of the finished White to cream colored whipped vegetable oil topping. Product form powder with a slightly Niaproof CSL is used as a conditioning sweet (caramel) odor agent in dehydrated potatoes in an amount Molecular not to exceed 0.5 percent by weight thereof. 895.27 g/mol weight Legislation CAS No. 5793-94-2 Niaproof Calcium Stearoyl Lactylate EINECS No. 227-335-7 complies with the Food Chemical Codex (FCC). It is a non-toxic additive permitted for HS-code EU 2915.70 direct addition to food for human HS-code US 2915.70 consumption as listed in 21 CFR 172.844. Niaproof CSL is also an approved food Flash point 222 °C additive according to EU with E-number Solubility in Sparingly soluble E482. Water Please check local legislation for the exact dosage levels and allowed applications. Stability Applications Niaproof Calcium Stearoyl Lactylate is stable for 2 years from date of manufacture.
    [Show full text]
  • Whole Grain Processing, Funcqonal Components for Posiqve Food
    Whole Grain Processing, Func3onal Components for Posi3ve Food A<ributes and Health Eric A. Decker Department of Food Science University of Massachuse<s How We Decide What Food to Buy? Nutri3on Convenience Value Taste Convenience Time Management • 1887: Half of a households labor hours were for preparing foods • 2010: – Food preparaon < 25 min/day www.d.umn.edu www.businessinsider.com Convenience Time Management • Households are also spending less 3me shopping for foods (< 15 min/day) – Requires foods will long shelf-life so food shopping is not a daily event – Requires one stop shopping vs. individual food vendors www.ers.usda.gov www.getrealmaine.com Value Increased Spending Power • Food Cost are declining 30 23.4% in 1929 25 20 15 10 9.6% in 2008 % Di sp o5 sab l e I n co me 0 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020 Year Whole Grains and Value www.mlive.com www.namamillers.org Whole Wheat Flour • Typically made by recombining the bran, germ and white flour at proper propor3ons • Straight grinding of the wheat berry can cause breaking of the germ and spreading of the germ oil throughout the flour • Germ Oil – 83% linoleic acid (18:2; omega 6) – 7% linolenic acid (18:3; omega 3) Impact of Unsaturation on Susceptibility to Lipid Oxidation RELATIVE OXIDIZIBILITY 1 18:1 10 18:2 20 18:3 30 20:4 40 20:5 Newspapers soaked in linseed oil caused fire due to spontaneous combus3on (Hampshire Gaze<e; Northampton, MA) Value Why are Whole Grain Flour and Products More Expensive? • Shelf-life – Whole wheat flour has a limited shelf-life due to rancidity = 1-3 months
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Baking and Pastries Chef Tammy Rink with William R
    Introduction to Baking and Pastries Chef Tammy Rink With William R. Thibodeaux PH.D. ii | Introduction to Baking and Pastries Introduction to Baking and Pastries | iii Introduction to Baking and Pastries Chef Tammy Rink With William R. Thibodeaux PH.D. iv | Introduction to Baking and Pastries Introduction to Baking and Pastries | v Contents Preface: ix Introduction to Baking and Pastries Topic 1: Baking and Pastry Equipment Topic 2: Dry Ingredients 13 Topic 3: Quick Breads 23 Topic 4: Yeast Doughs 27 Topic 5: Pastry Doughs 33 Topic 6: Custards 37 Topic 7: Cake & Buttercreams 41 Topic 8: Pie Doughs & Ice Cream 49 Topic 9: Mousses, Bavarians and Soufflés 53 Topic 10: Cookies 56 Notes: 57 Glossary: 59 Appendix: 79 Kitchen Weights & Measures 81 Measurement and conversion charts 83 Cake Terms – Icing, decorating, accessories 85 Professional Associations 89 vi | Introduction to Baking and Pastries Introduction to Baking and Pastries | vii Limit of Liability/disclaimer of warranty and Safety: The user is expressly advised to consider and use all safety precautions described in this book or that might be indicated by undertaking the activities described in this book. Common sense must also be used to avoid all potential hazards and, in particular, to take relevant safety precautions concerning likely or known hazards involving food preparation, or in the use of the procedures described in this book. In addition, while many rules and safety precautions have been noted throughout the book, users should always have adult supervision and assistance when working in a kitchen or lab. Any use of or reliance upon this book is at the user's own risk.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex XV Dossier PROPOSAL for IDENTIFICATION of A
    ANNEX XV – IDENTIFICATION OF C,C'-AZODI(FORMAMIDE) (ADCA) AS SVHC Annex XV dossier PROPOSAL FOR IDENTIFICATION OF A SUBSTANCE AS A CMR 1A OR 1B, PBT, vPvB OR A SUBSTANCE OF AN EQUIVALENT LEVEL OF CONCERN Substance Name(s): C,C'-azodi(formamide) (ADCA) EC Number(s): 204-650-8 CAS Number(s): 123-77-3 Submitted by: Environment Agency Austria on behalf of the Austrian Competent Authority (Austrian Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, Environment and Water Management) 1 CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS ......................................................................................................................................................5 PROPOSAL FOR IDENTIFICATION OF A SUBSTANCE AS A CMR 1A OR1B, PBT, VPVB OR A SUBSTANCE OF AN EQUIVALENT LEVEL OF CONCERN ........................................................................................................8 PART I..........................................................................................................................................................................10 JUSTIFICATION .........................................................................................................................................................10 1 IDENTITY OF THE SUBSTANCE AND PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES .................................10 1.1 Name and other identifiers of the substance ...................................................................................................10 1.2 Composition of the substance.........................................................................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • Whole Foods Market Unacceptable Ingredients for Food (As of March 15, 2019)
    Whole Foods Market Unacceptable Ingredients for Food (as of March 15, 2019) 2,4,5-trihydroxybutyrophenone (THBP) benzoyl peroxide acesulfame-K benzyl alcohol acetoin (synthetic) beta-cyclodextrin acetone peroxides BHA (butylated hydroxyanisole) acetylated esters of mono- and diglycerides BHT (butylated hydroxytoluene) activated charcoal bleached flour advantame bromated flour aluminum ammonium sulfate brominated vegetable oil aluminum potassium sulfate burnt alum aluminum starch octenylsuccinate butylparaben aluminum sulfate caffeine (extended release) ammonium alum calcium benzoate ammonium chloride calcium bromate ammonium saccharin calcium disodium EDTA ammonium sulfate calcium peroxide apricot kernel/extract calcium propionate artificial sweeteners calcium saccharin aspartame calcium sorbate azo dyes calcium stearoyl-2-lactylate azodicarbonamide canthaxanthin bacillus subtilis DE111 caprocaprylobehenin bacteriophage preparation carmine bentonite CBD/cannabidiol benzoates certified colors benzoic acid charcoal powder benzophenone Citrus Red No. 2 Page 1 of 4 cochineal foie gras DATEM gardenia blue diacetyl (synthetic) GMP dimethyl Silicone gold/gold leaf dimethylpolysiloxane heptylparaben dioctyl sodium sulfosuccinate (DSS) hexa-, hepta- and octa-esters of sucrose disodium 5'-ribonucleotides high-fructose corn syrup/HFCS disodium calcium EDTA hjijiki disodium dihydrogen EDTA hydrogenated oils disodium EDTA inosine monophosphate disodium guanylate insect Flour disodium inosinate iron oxide dodecyl gallate kava/kava kava EDTA lactic acid esters of monoglycerides erythrosine lactylated esters of mono- and diglycerides ethoxyquin ma huang ethyl acrylate (synthetic) methyl silicon ethyl vanillin (synthetic) methylparaben ethylene glycol microparticularized whey protein derived fat substitute ethylene oxide monoammonium glutamate eugenyl methyl ether (synthetic) monopotassium glutamate FD&C Blue No. 1 monosodium glutamate FD&C Blue No. 2 myrcene (synthetic) FD&C Colors natamycin (okay in cheese-rind wax) FD&C Green No.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Patent (11) 3,617,305 72) Inventors Jacques R
    United States Patent (11) 3,617,305 72) Inventors Jacques R. Roland Longueil, Quebec; 56 References Cited John Holme, Preville, Quebec, both of UNITED STATES PATENTS Canada 3,304,183 2/1967 Johnston et al............... 99/90 (21) Appl. No. 880,123 Primary Examiner-Raymond N. Jones 22) Filed Nov. 26, 1969 Assistant Examiner-James R. Hoffman 45) Patented Nov. 2, 1971 Attorney-Christen & Sabol 73) Assignee The Ogilve Flour Mills Company, Limited Montreal, Quebec, Canada (32) Priority Nov. 28, 1968 33) Canada 31 03.6423 ABSTRACT: Flour-based, dry mixes for use in the home preparation of yeast-raised products include an additive com (54) FLOUR-BASED DRY MIXESFOR HOMEBAKING position containing defined amounts of an ascorbate com 13 Claims, 9 Drawing Figs. pound, an edible oxidizing agent, and an edible sulfhydryl containing reducing agent. The additive composition inclusion (52) U.S. Cli....................................................... 99/91, permits a substantial reduction in the time usually required for 99.194 the kneading and fermentation steps, and, in certain instances, 51 Int. Cl......................................................... A21d 2/28, either one of these two steps may be eliminated. The flour A21d 2/22, A21d 2/04 based, dry mixes facilitate the home preparation of yeast 50 Field of Search............................................ 99/91,90, raised products within much shorter periods of time and more 94;99/91, 90,94 conveniently than hitherto. PATENTED NOY2 ISI 3,617,305 SHEET 1 OF 4 FIG.1 940 900 860 780 7 l O 100 ppm AA/50ppm Bromate 50ppm AA/50ppm. Bromate. 3. 7 OO 660 620 50ppm AA/25 frn Bromote MIXING, TIME (mins) PATENTED EY2 Cl 3, 67,305 SHEET 2 OF 4 FIG.2.
    [Show full text]