Core 1..230 Hansard (PRISM::Advent3b2 17.25)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
House of Commons Debates VOLUME 147 Ï NUMBER 226 Ï 2nd SESSION Ï 41st PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Monday, June 8, 2015 Speaker: The Honourable Andrew Scheer CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) 14673 HOUSE OF COMMONS Monday, June 8, 2015 The House met at 11 a.m. looking after the mental and physical well-being of law-abiding citizens. I made a commitment at the time to try to ensure this situation was Prayers not repeated in Saint John, or in any other community throughout Canada. I felt it was important for communities to have the information they needed in advance to allow the police and the PRIVATE MEMBERS' BUSINESS citizens to be prepared, and to ensure that the victims were aware about the people who had violated them as well. Ï (1105) [English] As lawmakers, we have an obligation to listen to our constituents and to act in the interests of the majority. I undertook, in 2013, to CORRECTIONS AND CONDITIONAL RELEASE ACT address the needs and concerns of the people in my riding. They The House resumed from April 28 consideration of the motion were concerned and looking to us to provide them with the that Bill C-642, an act to amend the Corrections and Conditional protection and information they needed to feel good about walking Release Act (high profile offender), be read the second time and the streets of Saint John. referred to a committee. Bill C-642 would not interfere with the rights of the inmate being The Speaker: There being no other members rising, I will turn to released. It would not change the fact that they are being released. It the hon. member for Saint John for his five-minute right of reply. would not deny the protection provided by our Canadian justice and Mr. Rodney Weston (Saint John, CPC): Mr. Speaker, I am very correctional system. honoured to stand in the House today to close the debate on second reading of my private member's bill, Bill C-642. What it would do is to give the citizens of our country, and the victims of crime, more information and a sense that they are being I feel very confident that my colleagues will see the wisdom of treated fairly. It would make the release of certain dangerous these proposed amendments to the Corrections and Conditional offenders part of the public record. Release Act. It would not be the responsibility of the police in local The private member's bill will amend the Corrections and communities to decide if certain information should be made public. Conditional Release Act so as to require Correctional Service This would give the public and the victims the knowledge so that Canada to disclose certain key information regarding the statutory certain individuals would not be able to quietly, and under the veil of release of a high-profile offender. This would be accomplished by secrecy, enter their community and possibly reoffend before the posting the required information as prescribed by the bill on the community even knows they are there. service's website, and also by providing written notice with the disclosure of the information to the victim or victims. The legislation I want to point out that this change would not apply to all would also provide for community consultation related to the offenders being released into our communities. It would only apply proposed release. to the most dangerous, as defined by schedule I of the act, or if the commissioner determines that the offence dynamics have elicited or I introduced the bill in order to fulfill a commitment that I made to have the potential to elicit a community reaction in the form of the citizens of my community after they were exposed to a situation significant public or media attention. that many felt was a major injustice in 2013. The injustice I speak of today was the release of three high-profile offenders into a halfway Mr. Speaker, I want to thank you very much for having taken the house in Saint John without any prior notice whatsoever to the time to listen to the bill and consider it. I want to thank all members community. This could happen in any community throughout for taking the time to consider the bill. It is very important to the Canada that is home to a halfway house that houses high-profile citizens of my community, and it certainly would make a difference offenders prior to their full release. going forward. I want to say at the outset that I believe we in society have an The Deputy Speaker: Is the House ready for the question? obligation to do our part to reintegrate individuals back into society once they have paid their dues. However, it cannot be without Some hon. members: Question. 14674 COMMONS DEBATES June 8, 2015 Business of Supply The Deputy Speaker: The question is on the motion. Is it the necessity that has prompted so many of us to express an interest in pleasure of the House to adopt the motion? speaking to this motion today, a motion that could only have been moved by the New Democratic Party. As we will see throughout the Some hon. members: Agreed. presentations being made today, both Liberal and Conservative Some hon. members: No. governments have a dismal record on employment insurance. The Deputy Speaker: All those in favour of the motion will please say yea. I wish to announce at the outset that I will be sharing my time with Some hon. members: Yea. the member for Dartmouth—Cole Harbour so that as many people as possible can have their say and discuss the ins and outs of this The Deputy Speaker: All those opposed will please say nay. measure, with the hope that through the exchange of ideas and as a Some hon. members: Nay. result of discussion and debate, we might have a unanimous vote, when the time comes, in favour of workers who sometimes face the The Deputy Speaker: In my opinion the yeas have it. unfortunate reality of being unemployed. We want employment And five or more members having risen: insurance to be there to get them through those difficult times. The Deputy Speaker: Pursuant to Standing Order 93, the recorded division stands deferred until Wednesday, June 10, 2015, immediately before the time provided for private members' business. This motion is especially crucial considering that it directly affects thousands and thousands of people all across Quebec and Canada. SUSPENSION OF SITTING No one in the House can claim that they do not know someone, The Deputy Speaker: Given the end of private members' whether a family member or friend, who has been affected recently business at this time, the House will stand suspended until noon, by a job loss, given the current economic situation. The motion put 12 o'clock. forward by the NDP today is the beginning of meaningful reparation. It is a first step towards creating a fairer, more equitable society, one (The sitting of the House was suspended at 11:04 p.m.) that reflects the NDP's policies and vision for future development. SITTING RESUMED (The House resumed at 12 p.m.) I would like to read the general thrust of the motion: That, in the opinion of the House, employment insurance premiums paid by GOVERNMENT ORDERS employers and workers must be used exclusively to finance benefits, as defined by Ï (1200) the Employment Insurance Act, for unemployed workers and their families... [English] BUSINESS OF SUPPLY That seems pretty obvious to me. We are talking about an OPPOSITION MOTION—EMPLOYMENT INSURANCE PREMIUMS employment insurance plan. Is the point of insurance not to The Deputy Speaker: Since today is the final allotted day for the voluntarily pay premiums in order to be prepared when catastrophe supply period ending June 23, 2015, the House will go through the strikes? We hope it does not. We all readily agree to pay for car usual procedures to consider and dispose of the supply bills. In view insurance, for example, but hope never to need to file a claim. The of recent practices, do hon. members agree that the bills be now same goes for home insurance. We are prepared to pay for our entire distributed? lives to protect this colossal investment, while hoping never to need to file a claim. However, when it comes to employment insurance, Some hon. members: Agreed. the Conservative government is completely distorting the meaning of [Translation] insurance. Instead of attacking unemployment, which is the main problem, the Conservatives have been attacking the unemployed Mr. Robert Aubin (Trois-Rivières, NDP) moved: ever since the 2013 reform. The Conservatives would have us That, in the opinion of the House, employment insurance premiums paid by believe that using employment insurance in order to work a few employers and workers must be used exclusively to finance benefits, as defined by the Employment Insurance Act, for unemployed workers and their families and that, weeks a year and then take the rest of the year off has become a way consequently, the government should: (a) protect workers' and employers' premiums of life for many Canadians. That is totally ridiculous. I have a from political interference; (b) improve program accessibility to ensure that statistic that says otherwise: the average duration of employment unemployed workers and their families can access it; and (c) abandon its plan, as insurance benefits is less than 20 weeks. It is clear to us that people set out in Budget 2015, to set rates unilaterally, in order to maintain long-term balance in the fund while improving accessibility.