<<

PHYSICAL REVIEW D 102, 063514 (2020)

Reheating after S-brane ekpyrosis

† ‡ Robert Brandenberger ,* Keshav Dasgupta, and Ziwei Wang Department of Physics, McGill University, Montr´eal, Quebec H3A 2T8, Canada

(Received 9 July 2020; accepted 27 August 2020; published 14 September 2020)

In recent work, two of us proposed a nonsingular ekpyrotic cosmology making use of an S-brane which forms at the end of the phase of ekpyrotic contraction. This S-Brane mediates a transition between contraction and expansion. Gravitational waves passing through the S-brane acquire a roughly scale- invariant spectrum, and if the S-brane has zero shear, then a roughly scale-invariant spectrum of cosmological perturbatiions results. Here, we study the production of gauge field fluctuations driven by the decay of the S-brane, and we show that the reheating process via gauge field production will be efficient, leading to a radiation-dominated expanding phase.

DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.102.063514

I. INTRODUCTION Among bouncing cosmologies, the ekpyrotic scenario Although the inflationary scenario [1] has become the [10] has a preferred status. The ekpyrotic scenario is based standard paradigm of early cosmology, it has on the hypothesis that the contracting phase was one of recently been challenged from considerations based on very slow contraction. Such a phase can be realized in the fundamental physics. On one hand, (at least context of Einstein gravity by assuming that matter is φ canonical single field slow-roll inflation) seems hard to dominated by a scalar field with a negative exponential realize in based on the swampland constraints potential (but positive total energy density) such that the ≫ 1 ¼ ρ [2] (see e.g., [3] for a review). On the other hand, the equation of state is w , where w P= is the ratio ρ effective field theory description of inflation is subject to between pressure P and energy density . As a consequence the trans-Planckian censorship constraint (TCC) [4] which of this equation of state, all initial cold matter, radiation, forces the energy scale of inflation to be many orders of spatial curvature, and anisotropy is suppressed relative to φ magnitude smaller than the scale of particle physics grand the energy density in . Thus, the ekpyrotic scenario solves unification (the scale used in the canonical single field the flatness problem of standard cosmology, and slow-roll models of inflation), leading to a negligible the homogeneous and isotropic contracting trajectory is an amplitude of primordial gravitational waves [5] (see, attractor in initial condition space, as first discussed in [11]. In the words of the recent paper [12], the ekpyrotic scenario however, [6] for an opposite point of view on this issue). 1 Inflation is not the only early universe scenario which is a supersmoother. can explain the current observational data (see e.g., [7] for a In order to yield a successful early universe cosmology, review of some alternative scenarios). Bouncing cosmol- there must be a well-controlled transition from the con- ogies (see e.g., [8] for a recent review) and emergent tracting ekpyrotic phase to the radiation phase of standard scenarios such as string gas cosmology [9] are promising big bang cosmology. In the past, the transition was either alternatives. However, at the moment none of the alter- assumed to be singular (breakdown of the effective field natives have been developed to the level of self-consistency theory description [10]) or else obtained by invoking matter that the inflationary scenario has. However, in light of the fields which violate the null energy condition [15] (see e.g., conceptual challenges to inflation, there is a great need to [16] for a review). In a recent work, two of us have work on improvements of alternative scenarios. suggested [17] that the transition arises as a consequence of an S-brane which appears once the background energy density reaches the string scale.2 From the point of view of *[email protected][email protected][email protected] 1Note that the homogeneous and isotropic expanding phase in large field inflation is also a local attractor in initial co- Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of ndition space [13], as recently reviewed in [14]. Large field the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. inflation is, however, in tension with the swampland criteria and Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the TCC [5]. the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, 2See [18] for previous work on obtaining a nonsingular bounce and DOI. Funded by SCOAP3. making use of an S-brane in a string theoretical setting.

2470-0010=2020=102(6)=063514(7) 063514-1 Published by the American Physical Society BRANDENBERGER, DASGUPTA, and WANG PHYS. REV. D 102, 063514 (2020) string theory, the S-brane represents string degrees of large values of φ and positive total energy. The equation of freedom which decouple at low energy densities but state of the scalar field matter is become comparable in energy to the energy scale of the background and hence have to be included in the low P 4 w ≡ ¼ ≫ 1; ð2Þ energy effective field theory as a space-filling object which ρ 3p is localized at a fixed time. Such a brane has vanishing energy density, and negative pressure (positive tension). As where we recall that P is the pressure, and ρ the energy such, it can mediate the transition between the contracting density. Hence, in the contracting phase, φ comes to phase and an expanding universe. In [17] it was shown that dominate over all other forms of energy which might have gravitational waves passing through the S-brane acquire a been present at the initial time. scale-invariant spectrum (with a slight blue tilt) if they Negative exponential potentials are ubiquitous in string begin as vacuum fluctuations early in the contracting phase. theory. In fact, the first realization of the ekpyrotic scenario In [19] it was then shown that, assuming that the S-brane [10] was based on the potential of a bulk brane moving in a has zero shear, the curvature fluctuations similarly obtain a Horava-Witten background [23]. In the context of string scale-invariant spectrum (this time with a slight red tilt), theory, we know that as the energy density of the back- and two consistency relations which related the amplitudes ground approaches the string scale, new stringy degrees of and tilts of the scalar and tensor spectra were derived. freedom become low mass and have to be included in the In the works [17,19] it was assumed that the universe is low energy effective action. In [17], we proposed to do this radiation dominated after the transition. Here we study the by adding an S-brane [24] to the action to yield production of radiation during the decay of the S-brane and Z show that, indeed, the post S-brane state is dominated by pffiffiffiffiffiffih 1 i radiation. In analogy to the reheating which takes place at ¼ 4 − þ ∂ φ∂μφ − ðφÞ S d x g R 2 μ V the end of inflation, where particle production is driven by Z the dynamics of the inflaton field [20,21] (see [22] for 4 pffiffiffi − d xκδðt − t Þ γ: ð3Þ reviews), we can speak of the process of reheating after B ekpyrosis which we analyze here.

In the following section, we review the S-brane bounce The second term is the S-brane. It is localized at the time tB mechanism and discuss the string theoretic setting of the when the background density reaches the string scale. In S-brane. In Sec. III we then discuss the coupling of the the above, R is the Ricci scalar and g is the determinant of S-brane to the Standard Model radiation field and then (in the four-dimensional space-time metric gμν, γ is the Sec. IV) estimate the efficiency of radiation production determinant of the induced metric on the S-brane world during the decay of the S-brane. We conclude with a volume, and κ is the tension of the S-brane, given by the summary and discussion of our results. string scale ηs. We assume a spatially flat homogeneous and isotropic As shown in [17], the S-brane mediates a nonsingular background space-time with scale factor aðtÞ, where t is transition between Ekpyrotic contraction and expansion. ≡ _ physical time. The Hubble expansion rate is H a=a, and Since the homogeneous and isotropic contracting solution its inverse is the Hubble radius, the length scale which plays is an attractor in initial condition space and any preexisting a key role in the evolution of cosmological fluctuations. We classical fluctuations at the beginning of the phase of ’ use units in which the speed of light and s constant ekpyrotic contraction get diluted relative to the contribution x are set to 1. Comoving spatial coordinates are denoted by , of φ, it is reasonable to assume that both scalar and tensor k and the corresponding comoving momentum vector is fluctuations are in their vacuum state on sub-Hubble scales. (its magnitude is written as k). The reduced Planck mass is It was shown [17] that the gravitational waves passing ’ denoted by mpl and it is related to Newton s gravitational through the S-brane acquire a scale-invariant spectrum, and −2 ¼ 8π constant G via mpl G. in [19] it was shown that, provided that the S-brane has zero shear, a scale-invariant spectrum of curvature fluctuations is II. S-BRANE BOUNCE generated. The scenario leads in fact to two consistency relations between the four basic cosmological observables The ekpyrotic scenario is based on an effective field [19], namely the amplitudes and tilts of the scalar and theory involving a canonically normalized scalar field φ tensor spectra. with negative exponential potential In [17,19] it was simply assumed that the state after the pffiffiffiffiffiffi cosmological bounce would be the radiation phase of − 2=pφ=m VðφÞ¼−V0e pl ð1Þ standard big bang cosmology, analogously to how the Standard Model radiation phase follows after inflation. In with V0 > 0 and 0

063514-2 REHEATING AFTER S-BRANE EKPYROSIS PHYS. REV. D 102, 063514 (2020) show that this reheating process exists and is indeed very efficient. In order to be able to study reheating after the S-brane bounce, we need to better understand the S-brane micro- physics. Let us consider, to be specific, type IIB superstring theory. In this theory, the gauge fields of the Standard Model of particle physics, including the photon field, live on the world volume of D-branes. In the context of type IIB string theory, our four-dimensional space-time can be considered to be the world volume of a D3 brane (three spatial and one time dimension) which is located at a particular point along the compactified spatial dimensions. Similar to what was done in the original Ekpyrotic proposal [10], we assume that φ is a Kähler modulus related VðTÞ to the size of one of the compact dimensions of space. The FIG. 1. The sketch of tachyon potential during the bounce phase. potential for such a modulus field is exponential, and negative (see e.g., [25] for a review). In line with the setup Z qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi of the ekpyrotic scenario, the evolution begins in a phase of 3 S ¼ dtd xV ðTÞ detðημν þ FμνÞ; ð5Þ contraction with positive total energy density, the kinetic BI total energy density being slightly larger than the potential ð Þ energy density. As the universe contracts, the energy where Vtotal T is the total potential energy of the tachyon, density increases until it reaches the string scale, which and Fμν is the field strength of the gauge field Aμ (in string happens at a value of φ which we denote by φs. At that units). The total potential energy gets a constant contribu- point, the kinetic energy density of φ is large enough to tion from the tension τ of the D3-brane plus the contribu- excite an S-brane. Similar to what was done in [24], we will tion from the tachyon field: model the S-brane by a tachyon condensate. The tachyon ð Þ¼τ þ ð Þþ ð∂ ∂2 …Þ ð Þ configuration Tðx; tÞ can be viewed as an unstable four Vtotal T V T f 0T; 0T; ; 6 brane, the extra spatial dimension being, for example, the 2 dimension corresponding to φ. Since anisotropies and where fð∂0T;∂0T;…Þ can be ignored for our case [27], matter inhomogeneities are smoothed out in the contracting and the constant term coming from the brane tension does phase, the tachyon configuration will be homogeneous not have any effect on the particle production calculation Tðx; tÞ¼TðtÞ on the three brane of our space-time volume. which we discuss below. Note that the potential of φ at φs is negative. Its value can We are interested in the growth of fluctuations of Aμ be viewed as the magnitude of the (negative) cosmological which start out in their vacuum state. Hence, we can expand μν constant in the anti–de-Sitter ground state of the string the square root and keep only the leading term in FμνF theory. The tachyon configuration can be described by a qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi positive potential energy density VðTÞ on top of the 1 μν detðημν þ FμνÞ ≃ 1 þ FμνF : ð7Þ negative value of the background. We take the potential 4 to have the form In particular, we then recover the usual gauge theory action  for jTj > η where V ðTÞ is a nonvanishing constant. − 1 λη2T2 þ 1 λη4; −η η; geneous tachyon kink3 KðtÞ the action for the gauge fields becomes [26] where we expect η to be given by the string scale. A sketch Z   1 1 of this potential is given in Fig. 1. 3 _ 2 ab _ _a S ¼ dtd xK ðtÞ FabF − Aa A ; ð8Þ In order to represent an S-brane, the total energy density 4 2 Vgrav (tachyon energy plus contribution from the cosmo- logical constant) must vanish at T ¼ 0. This forces η to be where the indices a, b are spatial ones, and we have of the order of the string energy scale. It is the quantity extracted the terms with time derivatives. We have also used the on-shell condition in (4) to replace Vtotal by Vgrav which determines the evolution of the gravitational _ 2 background. ðKÞ ðtÞ, ignoring constant factors. Note that, during The action of a Standard Model gauge field (e.g., the photon field) on the D3 brane has the Born-Infeld form (see 3As we pass through the S-brane, the value of the tachyon T e.g., [26]) changes as a function of time. We set KðtÞ¼TðtÞ.

063514-3 BRANDENBERGER, DASGUPTA, and WANG PHYS. REV. D 102, 063514 (2020)

φ passage through the S-brane, the coefficient K_ depends on density in the field is slightly positive. This implies that time, and hence gauge field particle production is possible. the magnitude of the kinetic energy is close to (but larger) This is what we study in the following two sections. than the absolute value of the total potential energy Vtotal. Hence we expect III. COUPLING OF RADIATION TO THE S-BRANE v ≃ λ1=2η2; ð14Þ We have seen that the coupling of the S-brane to the gauge field Aμ is given by [26] where v is defined in (13). This implies that Z   1 1 −1=2 −1 ¼ 3 _ 2ð Þ ab − _ _ a ð Þ P ≃ λ η : ð15Þ S dtd xK t 4 FabF 2 AaA ; 9 To make contact with the discussion in [26], we note that in where the indices a, b run only over space, and we have our case the profile function KðtÞ is given by the soliton used temporal gauge. This action can be put into canonical solution of the equation of motion for TðtÞ: form by defining a rescaled gauge field KðtÞ¼TðtÞ; ð16Þ _ Ba ≡ KAa ð10Þ which implies that ˜ with associated field strength tensor Fab. In terms of this K rescaled gauge field, the action is given by [26] ;ttt ¼ λη2: ð17Þ Z     K;t 1 1 ∂2 K S ¼ dtd3x F˜ F˜ ab þ B − þ ;ttt Ba ; ð11Þ 4 ab 2 a ∂2t K ;t IV. REHEATING FROM S-BRANE DECAY where K;ttt stands for the third time derivative of K. As discussed in the previous section, the coupling of the The equation of motion for T in the range −η η4λ > v ð 2 þ 1Þðt þ PÞ − η;t<−P which is a wave equation with tachyonic mass term. The > v < pffiffi solution for the Fourier modes is given by ðη λ Þ TðtÞ¼ v sinhpffiffi t − ð Þ > η λ ; P t η2λ−k2 −t η2λ−k2 > qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi B ðk; tÞ¼c1e þ c2e ;k η4λ i pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi c v ð 2 þ 1Þðt − PÞþη;t>P; v it η2λ−k2 −it η2λ−k2 Biðk; tÞ¼c1e þ c2e ;k>kc; ð19Þ where we have adjusted the time axis such that T is at the ≡ λ1=2η top of the potential at time t ¼ 0, and v is the velocity of with kc . From (20) it is not hard to see that the → 0 0 the field at the top. The time interval P is the duration of the growingpffiffi mode k for t> asymptotically scales as η λt bounce, and is determined by when TðPÞ¼η. e . The corresponding modes of Ai field, however, is a The scenario we have in mind is now the following. constant mode. Therefore there is no growing mode for Ai During the phase of Ekpyrotic contraction, φ is decreasing after t ¼ 0. from a very large initial positive value. Once the energy In terms of the canonical gauge field, the equation of density of φ approaches the string density the S-brane motion becomes [inserting the expression (16) for KðtÞ] forms. The formation of the S-brane is the process where T pffiffiffi pffiffiffi ¼ −η ¼ 0 ̈ _ 2 increases from T to T . The decay of the S-brane Ai þ 2η λ tanh ðη λtÞAi þ k Ai ¼ 0: ð20Þ corresponds to the motion of T from T ¼ 0 to T ¼ η. During the phase of ekpyrotic contraction, the total energy The solution of this equation can be written as follows:

( pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi pffiffiffi pffiffiffi −t η2λ−k2 t η2λ−k2 c˜1e þ c˜2e ;kkc ¼ η λ:

063514-4 REHEATING AFTER S-BRANE EKPYROSIS PHYS. REV. D 102, 063514 (2020) ( pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi pffiffiffi In the asymptotic regions t → ∞, Eq. (20) has solutions pffiffi η2λ−k2t ¼η λ þη λt e ;kkc ¼η λ: ( pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi pffiffiffi 2 2 ð Þ pffiffi η λ−k t ¼ η λ 23 −η λt e ;kkc ¼ η λ During the phase of ekpyrotic contraction, any preexist- ing gauge field fluctuations are diluted compared to the ð22Þ energy density in φ. Hence, the gauge field fluctuations will be in their ground state when φ hits the S-brane. Hence, focusing on modes with k

8 ð1Þ −ikt > A ¼ peffiffipffiffi t<−P <> i 2 k pffiffiffi pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi A ¼ ð2Þ ¼ ðη λ Þð −t η2λ−k2 þ t η2λ−k2 Þ − ð24Þ i > Ai sech t c1e c2e P : ð3Þ −ikt þikt A ¼ α peffiffipffiffi þ β peffiffipffiffi t>P; i 2 k 2 k

where the constants c1, c2, α and β (which are all functions Note that for k>k the Bogoliubov coefficients are sup- _ c of k) are determined by matching Ai and Ai at t ¼ −P and pressed. t ¼ P, i.e., using the junction conditions Since the particle number density is given by the ð Þ ∼ jβj2  Bogoliubov mode mixing coefficient, i.e., n k , ð1Þð− Þ¼ ð2Þð− Þ _ ð1Þð− Þ¼ _ ð2Þð− Þ Ai P Ai P ; Ai P Ai P we can use the above results to give an order of magnitude ð25Þ estimate of the energy density in gauge fields produced ð2Þð Þ¼ ð3Þð Þ _ ð2Þð Þ¼ _ ð3Þð Þ Ai P Ai P ; Ai P Ai P : during S-brane decay. The energy density in the gauge fields can be obtained by integrating over the contribution Using (24) and (25) we can solve for the Bogoliubov mode β jβj2 − jαj2 ¼ 1 of all modes with k

μ2 4ðμ Þ 1 2 sech P pffiffiffiffiffi jβj ¼ Akð0Þ¼ : ð29Þ 16 2ð1 − k2Þ 2k k μ2 " sffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi ! sffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi!! 2 2 1 − k þ 1 2 μ 1 − 1 − k Making use of the solution (24) we obtain × μ2 sinh P μ2 sffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi sffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi Z ! !!# k 2 1 1 2 2 2 ρ ð Þ ∼ c k jβ j2 2 ∼ λ2η4 ð Þ k k A P dk 2 k k : 30 þ 1 − − 1 2 μ 1 − þ 1 0 2π 2k 32π μ2 sinh P μ2

ð26Þ Here, the first factor of k2 comes from the phase space pffiffiffi measure, and the second factor of k2 comes from the where we introduced the constant μ ≡ λη to simplify the gradients (recall that the energy is gradient energy). The ≪ expression. In the infrared limit k kc we obtain integral is dominated by the upper limit, and, inserting the value for kc and the result (28) for the Bogoliubov k2sech4ðμPÞð4Pμ þ sinhð4PμÞÞ2 jβj2 ≈ ∼ k2; ð27Þ coefficients, we obtain 64μ2ð1 − k2Þ μ2

ρAðτÞ 3 ∼ ∼ λ: ð31Þ while for k kc we get V0 16π 2 4 2 2 μ sech ðμPÞðsinhð2 μPÞ − 2 μP coshð2 μPÞÞ jβj ≈− : This is the main result of our analysis. We expect λ ∼ 1, and 4k2 hence we see that the S-brane can very efficiently decay ð Þ 28 into radiation.

063514-5 BRANDENBERGER, DASGUPTA, and WANG PHYS. REV. D 102, 063514 (2020)

V. CONCLUSIONS AND DISCUSSION S-brane energy into radiation. Hence, there is no obstruc- tion to efficient reheating after the S-brane bounce. The We have studied the embedding of the S-brane bounce S-brane will automatically mediate not only the transition scenario proposed in [17] into string theory. Considering between an initial contracting phase and an expanding type IIB superstring theory, our space-time can be viewed phase, but in fact to the expanding radiation phase of as a D3-brane on which the usual Standard Model fields standard big bang cosmology. (including the gauge field of electromagnetism) live. At the end point of a phase of ekpyrotic contraction, an unstable ACKNOWLEDGMENTS D4-brane is excited and acts gravitationally as an S-brane. This tachyonic brane fills our three spatial dimensions and The research at McGill is supported in part by funds is extended in one further direction (e.g., the direction from NSERC and from the Canada Research Chair pro- which corresponds to the Ekpyrotic scalar field φ). The gram. R. B. is grateful for hospitality of the Institute for tachyon configuration couples to the gauge fields via a and the Institute for Particle Physics Born-Infeld action. Hence, during the formation and decay and Astrophysics of the ETH Zurich during the completion of the D4-brane, gauge field production can occur. We have of this project. Z. W. acknowledges partial support from a shown that the process of gauge field production is very McGill Space Institute Graduate Fellowship and from a effective and can transfer a fraction of order one of the Templeton Foundation Grant.

[1] A. H. Guth, The inflationary universe: A possible solution to [9] R. H. Brandenberger and C. Vafa, Superstrings in the the horizon and flatness problems, Phys. Rev. D 23, 347 early universe, Nucl. Phys. B316, 391 (1989); A. Nayeri, (1981); Adv. Ser. Astrophys. Cosmol. 3, 139 (1987); R. H. Brandenberger, and C. Vafa, Producing a Scale- R. Brout, F. Englert, and E. Gunzig, The creation of the Invariant Spectrum of Perturbations in a Hagedorn universe as a quantum phenomenon, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 115, Phase of String Cosmology, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 021302 78 (1978); A. A. Starobinsky, A new type of isotropic (2006). cosmological models without singularity, Phys. Lett. 91B, [10] J. Khoury, B. A. Ovrut, P. J. Steinhardt, and N. Turok, 99 (1980); K. Sato, First order phase transition of a vacuum Ekpyrotic universe: Colliding branes and the origin of the and expansion of the universe, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. hot big bang, Phys. Rev. D 64, 123522 (2001); J. Khoury, 195, 467 (1981). B. A. Ovrut, N. Seiberg, P. J. Steinhardt, and N. Turok, [2] H. Ooguri and C. Vafa, On the geometry of the string From big crunch to big bang, Phys. Rev. D 65, 086007 landscape and the swampland, Nucl. Phys. B766, 21 (2007); (2002). G. Obied, H. Ooguri, L. Spodyneiko, and C. Vafa, De Sitter [11] J. K. Erickson, D. H. Wesley, P. J. Steinhardt, and N. space and the swampland, arXiv:1806.08362;P.Agrawal, Turok, Kasner and mixmaster behavior in G. Obied, P. J. Steinhardt, and C. Vafa, On the cosmological with equation of state w>∼1, Phys. Rev. D 69, 063514 implications of the string swampland, Phys. Lett. B 784,271 (2004). (2018); S. K. Garg and C. Krishnan, Bounds on slow roll and [12] W. G. Cook, I. A. Glushchenko, A. Ijjas, F. Pretorius, and thedeSitterswampland,J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2019) 075. P. J. Steinhardt, Supersmoothing through slow contraction, [3] T. D. Brennan, F. Carta, and C. Vafa, The string landscape, Phys. Lett. B 808, 135690 (2020). the swampland, and the missing corner, Proc. Sci., [13] R. H. Brandenberger and J. H. Kung, Chaotic inflation as an TASI2017 (2017) 015 [arXiv:1711.00864]; E. Palti, The attractor in initial condition space, Phys. Rev. D 42, 1008 swampland: Introduction and review, Fortschr. Phys. 67, (1990); H. A. Feldman and R. H. Brandenberger, Chaotic 1900037 (2019). inflation with metric and matter perturbations, Phys. Lett. B [4] A. Bedroya and C. Vafa, Trans-Planckian censorship and the 227, 359 (1989); W. E. East, M. Kleban, A. Linde, and swampland, arXiv:1909.11063. L. Senatore, Beginning inflation in an inhomogeneous [5] A. Bedroya, R. Brandenberger, M. Loverde, and C. Vafa, universe, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 09 (2016) 010; Trans-Planckian censorship and inflationary cosmology, K. Clough, E. A. Lim, B. S. DiNunno, W. Fischler, R. Phys. Rev. D 101, 103502 (2020). Flauger, and S. Paban, Robustness of inflation to inhomo- [6] G. Dvali, A. Kehagias, and A. Riotto, Inflation and geneous initial conditions, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 09 decoupling, arXiv:2005.05146. (2017) 025. [7] R. H. Brandenberger, Cosmology of the very early universe, [14] R. Brandenberger, Initial conditions for inflation: A short AIP Conf. Proc. 1268, 3 (2010); Alternatives to the infla- review, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 26, 1740002 (2017). tionary paradigm of structure formation, Int. J. Mod. Phys. [15] A. Notari and A. Riotto, Isocurvature perturbations in Conf. Ser. 01, 067 (2011). the ekpyrotic universe, Nucl. Phys. B644, 371 (2002); [8] R. Brandenberger and P. Peter, Bouncing cosmologies: F. Finelli, Assisted contraction, Phys. Lett. B 545,1 Progress and problems, Found. Phys. 47, 797 (2017). (2002); F. Di Marco, F. Finelli, and R. Brandenberger,

063514-6 REHEATING AFTER S-BRANE EKPYROSIS PHYS. REV. D 102, 063514 (2020)

Adiabatic and isocurvature perturbations for multifield [20] A. D. Dolgov and D. P. Kirilova, On particle creation generalized Einstein models, Phys. Rev. D 67, 063512 by a time dependent scalar field, Yad. Fiz. 51, 273 (2003); J. L. Lehners, P. McFadden, N. Turok, and P. J. (1990) [Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 51, 172 (1990)]. Steinhardt, Generating ekpyrotic curvature perturbations [21] J. H. Traschen and R. H. Brandenberger, Particle production before the big bang, Phys. Rev. D 76, 103501 (2007);E. during out-of-equilibrium phase transitions, Phys. Rev. D I. Buchbinder, J. Khoury, and B. A. Ovrut, New ekpyrotic 42, 2491 (1990). cosmology, Phys. Rev. D 76, 123503 (2007); P. Creminelli [22] R. Allahverdi, R. Brandenberger, F. Y. Cyr-Racine, and and L. Senatore, A smooth bouncing cosmology with scale A. Mazumdar, Reheating in inflationary cosmology: Theory invariant spectrum, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 11 (2007) and applications, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 60, 27 (2010); 010. M. A. Amin, M. P. Hertzberg, D. I. Kaiser, and J. Karouby, [16] J. L. Lehners, Ekpyrotic and cyclic cosmology, Phys. Rep. Nonperturbative dynamics of reheating after inflation: A 465, 223 (2008). review, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 24, 1530003 (2015). [17] R. Brandenberger and Z. Wang, Nonsingular ekpyrotic [23] P. Horava and E. Witten, Eleven-dimensional supergravity cosmology with a nearly scale-invariant spectrum of cos- on a manifold with boundary, Nucl. Phys. B475, 94 (1996); mological perturbations and gravitational waves, Phys. Rev. P. Horava and E. Witten, Heterotic and type I string D 101, 063522 (2020). dynamics from eleven-dimensions, Nucl. Phys. B460, [18] R. H. Brandenberger, C. Kounnas, H. Partouche, S. P. Patil, 506 (1996). and N. Toumbas, Cosmological perturbations across an [24] M. Gutperle and A. Strominger, Space-like branes, J. High S-brane, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2014) 015; Energy Phys. 04 (2002) 018. C. Kounnas, H. Partouche, and N. Toumbas, S-brane to [25] D. Baumann and L. McAllister, Inflation and string theory, thermal non-singular string cosmology, Classical Quantum arXiv:1404.2601. Gravity 29, 095014 (2012); C. Kounnas, H. Partouche, and [26] J. A. Minahan and B. Zwiebach, Gauge fields and fermions N. Toumbas, Thermal duality and non-singular cosmology in tachyon effective field theories, J. High Energy Phys. 02 in d-dimensional superstrings, Nucl. Phys. B855, 280 (2001) 034. (2012). [27] A. Sen, Supersymmetric world volume action for non-BPS [19] R. Brandenberger and Z. Wang, Ekpyrotic cosmology D-branes, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (1999) 008; A Sen, Non- with a zero-shear S-brane, Phys. Rev. D 102, 023516 BPS D-branes in string theory, Classical Quantum Gravity (2020). 17, 1251 (2000).

063514-7