Arxiv:1301.4703V2 [Gr-Qc] 27 Jan 2013 Models Are Unstable to the Addition of Radiation

Anisotropy in a Nonsingular Bounce Yi-Fu Cai,1, ∗ Robert Brandenberger,1, y and Patrick Peter2, z 1Department of Physics, McGill University, Montréal, QC H3A 2T8, Canada 2 GR"CO – Institut d’Astrophysique de Paris, UMR7095 CNRS, Université Pierre & Marie Curie, 98 bis boulevard Arago, 75014 Paris, France (Dated: June 26, 2018) Following recent claims relative to the question of large anisotropy production in regular bouncing scenarios, we study the evolution of such anisotropies in a model where an Ekpyrotic phase of contraction is followed by domination of a Galileon-type Lagrangian which generates a non-singular bounce. We show that the anisotropies decrease during the phase of Ekpyrotic contraction (as expected) and that they can be constrained to remain small during the non-singular bounce phase (a non-trivial result). Specifically, we derive the e-folding number of the phase of Ekpyrotic contraction which leads to a present-day anisotropy in agreement with current observational bounds. PACS numbers: 98.80.-k,98.80.Cq I. INTRODUCTION ferentiated from inflation is the shape of the bispectrum [12]. The idea of a non-singular bouncing universe as an al- Bouncing cosmologies, however, face several problems. ternative to the singular Big Bang paradigm has been First of all, new physics is required to provide the bounce attractive on philosophical grounds for a long time. (a pure GR bounce sourced by a regular fluid also leads More recently [1, 2] it has been realized that a non- to dynamical instabilities [13], while with a scalar field singular bouncing cosmology with a matter-dominated a positive spatial curvature [14] or non-canonical kinetic initial phase of contraction - a “matter bounce” cosmology term [15] is required). Such new physics can either come - may provide an alternative to the inflationary paradigm from introducing new forms of matter such as phantom or of cosmological structure formation (see e.g. [3] for re- quintom fields [16], ghost condensates [17, 18], Galileons cent reviews). Since the curvature perturbation ζ grows [19], S-branes [20] or effective string theory actions [21]. on super-Hubble scales in the contracting phase, fluctu- It can also arise from corrections to Einstein gravity, as ations on long wavelengths get boosted by a larger fac- e.g. in the non-singular universe construction of [22], tor than those on small scales. In a matter-dominated specifically applied to the bouncing scenario in [23], in phase of contraction the relative enhancement factor is the ghost-free higher derivative gravity model of [24], in precisely such as to transform an initial vacuum spectrum terms of torsion gravity [25], or in Hořava-Lifshitz gravity into a scale-invariant one. Studies in many non-singular [26]. Finally, a bouncing phase can also originate from models [4] have shown that the scale-invariance of the pure quantum cosmological effects [27]; those also pro- spectrum of ζ1 before the bounce is maintained through vide a natural framework in which a dust-dominated con- the bounce on length scales which are larger than the traction is easily implemented to yield a scale-invariant duration of the bouncing phase (the phase in which the spectrum of perturbation [28]. violation of the usual energy conditions is localized)2. A more serious problem for bouncing cosmologies is Hence, the matter bounce scenario leads to the same the fact that the contracting phase is unstable to various shape of the spectrum of primordial curvature fluctua- effects. As discussed e.g. in [29], many matter bounce tions on super-Hubble scales as inflationary cosmology. arXiv:1301.4703v2 [gr-qc] 27 Jan 2013 models are unstable to the addition of radiation. This Starting with vacuum initial conditions, the fluctuations arises since the energy density of radiation scales as a−4, are also Gaussian and coherent. A specific prediction of where a(t) is the cosmological scale factor, whereas the the matter bounce with which the scenario can be dif- density of matter grows as a−3. In some models (e.g. [16]) this will lead to a “Big Crunch” singularity instead of a smooth bounce. Some constructions (e.g. those of [18, 22], [20] and [30]) are free from this problem. How- ∗Electronic address: [email protected] yElectronic address: [email protected] ever, a problem for all constructions mentioned so far is zElectronic address: [email protected] the instability to the growth of anisotropic stress, whose 1 The variable ζ is the curvature fluctuation in comoving gauge. associated energy density grows as a−6. This is the fa- It is proportional to the canonical fluctuation variable v - the mous BKL instability of a contracting universe [31]. Sasaki-Mukhanov variable [5, 6] - in terms of which the action for cosmological fluctuations has canonical form. See e.g. [7] for A solution of this anisotropy problem can be realized in a comprehensive review and [8, 9] for introductory overviews of the theory of cosmological perturbations. the Ekpyrotic scenario [32], in which it is postulated that 2 Note that there are counterexamples as discussed in [10] and a matter field with equation of state parameter w 1 more recently in [11]. (where w = p/ρ is the ratio of pressure p to energy den- 2 sity ρ) is dominant in the contracting phase3. Such an not apply to all non-singular bouncing cosmologies. equation of state can be realized by treating the dominant The outline of this paper is as follows. In the next sec- form of matter as a scalar field with negative exponen- tion we review the bounce model introduced in [38] and tial potential. Since the energy density of the dominant derive the resulting equations of motion for a homoge- matter then scales with a−q with q 6, anisotropies be- neous but anisotropic universe. In Section 3 we analyt- come negligible and the BKL instability is avoided [37]4. ically study the background dynamics in each phase of In a recent paper [38], a subset of the present authors the cosmological evolution from the initial matter phase introduced a scalar field with an Ekpyrotic potential to of contraction through the Ekpyrotic phase to the bounc- construct a matter bounce scenario which is free from the ing phase and the subsequent fast-roll expanding period. BKL instability problem. Specifically, we determine the decay or growth rates of The Ekpyrotic scenario in its original formulation [32] the anisotropy parameter in each phase. In Section 4 we involves a singular bounce. In addition, the curvature solve the dynamical system numerically and present our final results. We close with a general discussion. spectrum of ζ is an nS = 3 spectrum rather than a scale- invariant n = 1 one [39–42]. Hence, without non-trivial A word on notation: We define the reduced Planck S p matching of ζ across the bounce, one cannot obtain a mass by MPl = 1= 8πGN where GN is Newton’s gravi- scale-invariant spectrum at late time5. To solve this tational constant. The sign of the metric is taken to be problem, a new and non-singular version of the Ekpyrotic (+; −; −; −). Note that we take the value of the mean scenario [46] was proposed in which a second scalar field scale factor at the bounce point to be aB = 1 throughout is introduced which does not influence the background the paper. dynamics but develops a scale-invariant spectrum which starts out as an isocurvature mode but which is trans- ferred to the adiabatic mode during the evolution. The II. A NONSINGULAR BOUNCE MODEL second field can also be given a “ghost condensate” La- grangian [47] in which case it mediates a non-singular We consider a nonsingular bounce model in which the bounce. However, as has been pointed out in [48], in universe is filled with two matter components, a cosmic this “New Ekpyrotic” scenario the anisotropies which are scalar field φ and a generic matter fluid, as proposed in highly suppressed during the contracting phase again Ref. [38] (which, in turn, is based on the theory devel- raise their head and lead to a BKL instability. oped in [49]). The Lagrangian of φ is given by In our previous work [38], we argued qualitatively that in the model we considered the anisotropies remained L [φ (x)] = K(φ, X) + G(φ, X)φ, (1) negligibly small during the bouncing phase. The reason for the difference compared to what happens in the model where K and G are functions of φ and its canonical ki- of [46] is that in our model the kinetic condensate which netic term grows as the bounce is approached does not need to de- 1 µ crease again by the time of the bounce point. This leads X ≡ @µφ∂ φ, (2) to a shorter bounce time scale and to different dynamics. 2 In this paper we carefully study the development of while the other kinetic terms of φ include the operator anisotropies in the bouncing cosmology with an Ekpy- µν rotic phase of contraction introduced in [38]. We work φ ≡ g rµrν φ. (3) in the context of a homogeneous but anisotropic Bianchi cosmology in which the scale factors in each spatial di- Variation of the above scalar field Lagrangian mini- mension evolve independently. We are able to show that mally coupled to Einstein gravity leads to the following no BKL type instability develops, in agreement with corresponding energy momentum tensor what the study of [38] indicated. Our work thus shows φ σ that the arguments against non-singular (as opposed to Tµν = (−K + 2XG,φ + G;X rσXr φ)gµν singular) bouncing cosmologies put forwards in [48] do +(K;X + G;X φ − 2G,φ)rµφrν φ −G;X (rµXrν φ + rν Xrµφ); (4) in which we use the notation that F and F denote 3 ,φ ;X There are other approaches to address the anisotropy prob- derivatives of whatever functional F(φ, X) may be with lem.

Load more